TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Commander_Uhltes Archive

View 0 posts and 206 comments by Commander_Uhltes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Please actually read instead of just fighting a strawman in your head. At no point did I ever say it wasn't meant as an insult.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:21 PM
1

If you call a straight man gay with the implication that that's a bad thing, then yes. But that's not what's happening here. A straight man is called gay because he doesn't want to have sex with women. There is absolutely no implication that being gay is bad. The person might very well think that, but it's not stated or implied anywhere here. I can see I'm not getting anywhere with this. Apparently MensRights has gone social justice warrior as well. But it is objectively not used to insult gay p…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 08:07 AM
-16

In many cases, sure. But in this particular case it's saying "if you don't want sex with a woman, you must be gay." If anything that's an insult to straight men.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:28 PM
-21

Is it, though? They're saying that a homosexual man would not want to have sex with a woman. That's not homophobic. It's just an extreme jump to conclusions. Nothing negative about gay people is implied.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:54 AM
33

men finally have to answer for their centuries of god awful behavior The definition of sexism. Some men did something, therefore other men who had nothing to do with it must suffer. This is fair because they have the same genitals. Absolutely psychotic.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:25 AM
16

Just FYI, conscript roles are never all that dangerous in Denmark. You can't be sent abroad or forced to fight in wars - you have to volunteer for that.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:19 AM
81

I guess if women find him unattractive, that just means he's part of the 80%.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:52 AM
9

Yeah, by idiots.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:18 PM
5

Then how did you think that was relevant?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/22 06:46 AM
1

Yeah, I don't know. I'm 6'6", and I can't recognise most of those things - not to any problematic degree, at least. The biggest issue is actually finding shoes in European size 48, when most stores stop at 46. Some of it I could ascribe to probably living in a country with a higher average height than yours, but things like cars are mostly global. There are some cars I don't fit in the driver's seat in, like the Nissan Qashqai (Rogue in the US), which has its pedals angled so they're unusable wi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/22 07:35 AM
7

What? How? I mean, I agree there's nothing inherently "alpha" about being a certain height, but how does it suck?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/22 07:55 AM
10

women do not even enjoy sex Is this seriously something people believe after the 19th century?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/21 09:42 AM
2

If she's the love of your life, chances are she's got an actual personality and looks for one in her partners as well. It's not like only shallow women exist - I've got an amazing one myself. It's just that out of the shallow people, men generally seem to have more realistic expectations than women.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/21 06:36 AM
56

I honestly doubt it's as high as 2%. Successful, attractive and submissive? That's more like 0.1% of men, and for them it's a fetish. And if we take that "never looked at porn" thing literally, it's exactly 0% - at least in countries where the internet is a thing. They might as well feel entitled to a unicorn.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/21 06:27 AM
2

I don't think it's malicious for most of them. I think deep down most of these women are just ordinary, heterosexual women who want to be happy in a steady relationship with a man who loves them. But all their lives they've been bombarded from women's magazines, woke culture and general unopposed girltalk that they should hate men, and that men are scum and they don't need them. So they have this weird cognitive dissonance where they can't deny their basic needs and desires, but feel guilty for …
/r/MensRights04/07/21 05:41 PM
6

This is a good start. Dictionaries are not useful for defining political movements and ideologies.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 12:11 PM
11

No, they are not right. Feminism has literally never been about equality. And this is the most pathetic form of argument possible: making a statement, and then accusing anyone who disagrees of just "not wanting to hear anything else".
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:57 AM
7

How many women?
/r/MensRights21/06/21 11:10 AM
2

No, it's creepy and repulsive. For me, anyway - I'm not going to tell others what they can enjoy, but it's like nails on a chalkboard to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 05:49 AM
3

Cause to use autism or autistic in this fashion is a dick move Why? Just making the claim doesn't "start a conversation", it's just pointless. Why do you believe it's a dick move? Are genuinely brain damaged people supposed to be offended when people use "brain damaged" as an insult? Are deaf people supposed to be offended when someone says "are you deaf?" to someone who just isn't paying attention? Etc. Why is it wrong to use a term that has a medical meaning in a context where it obviously isn…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 08:11 PM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 07:24 PM
-1

And you actually want that? You want to date/marry a woman who is completely submissive to you and has no opinions of her own - i.e. just an expensive sex doll?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:24 PM
-1

"Main reason" does not imply "no other reasons." Which is why I at no point said that, but explicitly said that the other reasons just must be less important, which I still don't believe. if there were somehow love and companionship but with no sex possible, most men would never (and do not) consider entering into such a "romantic" relationship That's exactly what I called bullshit to before, and now you're just repeating the claim. Still bullshit. Men need love and companionship about as much a…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 05:42 PM
1

The main reason? I really, really doubt that. You're implying men don't feel a need for love and companionship, or at least to a much lesser extent than women. I really do not believe that to be true. If that's the impression you get, I'd bet that stems more from the suppression of men's emotion and vulnerability than men actually just being shallow and unemotional. And no, you don't feel love from sex. You wouldn't feel love from creaming in a hooker, so it's not the sex itself that does it, it…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 05:19 PM
12

Agree with it or not, you're being an idiot or deliberately dishonest by assuming he's only basing it on that.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/21 01:40 PM
19

If someone is actually traumatised by mere talking about politics, they are so utterly weak and pathetic that they really need the shock therapy, and I'm certainly not going to respect it.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/21 10:52 AM
47

Have you read the article on GamerGate? 100% lies from start to end.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 08:48 AM
8

feminism initially wants to support equality That's a nice thought, but it's never been true. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bt6hfr/history_of_feminism_the_way_they_dont_want_us_to/
/r/MensRights30/03/21 05:50 PM
14

It's also doubly insulting to themselves. They're saying the entire female sex, about half the population, have allowed themselves to be oppressed and controlled by a patriarchy that's so incompetent, it can't even figure out how not to primarily attack itself. According to feminists, women must be mind-numbingly stupid and pathetically weak. Glad I don't agree with them.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 05:46 PM
5

I think we might be misunderstanding each other. I completely agree with you, and suspect the others would as well, that most of the people who make up the modern left wing are at odds with men's issues. What I mean is that left wing politics in principle don't need to conflict with this. I've always felt that a large state and a high degree of social safety was a good thing, and I'm willing to pay a large percentage in tax to support this. There's much more to it, but that's the big one that de…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:56 PM
2

You're not even making enough sense to allow a coherent reply, so please - tell the class how exactly left-wing politics prevent supporting men's issues. And please tell me how my country, which exists entirely on what Americans define as the left wing, and which simultaneously has far fewer and smaller typical men's issues, apparently can't logically exist.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:04 PM
7

Sorry, mate, but you're just a moron. Left-wing politics and wokeism are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 10:11 AM
4

Anyone who still believes feminism was ever a force for good needs to read this.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 05:01 PM
7

Really? That's such a silly argument, and the exact same as saying that because we're advised to lock our front doors, that means thieves are devoid of responsibility. No, the thieves are still the assholes, it's just common sense to protect yourself anyway. Very few people think it's acceptable to harass anyone else, sexually or otherwise - although people's definition of what constitutes harassment varies. But do you actually think women who sexually harass men are held more to account for it?…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 04:58 PM
8

What I'm talking about however is the way men are devoid of almost all responsibility for their actions You mean the exact opposite of objective reality, where women are rarely held accountable for the same actions as men, and get something like 60% milder sentences for the same crimes? Physical power is the only type of power that men on average have over women through no choice of their own. Hence why men are inherently more criminal than women Men are more criminal because they have higher le…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 04:53 PM
13

I killed JFK. Are the FBI going to show up on my doorstep If they actually believed you, yes. Yes they would.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:19 AM
5

This is the original: https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/2nonqz/i_wasnt_treating_my_husband_fairly_and_it_wasnt/ Sadly it's been deleted for some reason.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:49 AM
5

Then I'd like to know where you get the "just because she's a woman" part from. There are plenty of videos of police retaliating with fists against fists, and apart from the completely fringe ACAB-lunatics, who will hate the cops no matter what they do, I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that isn't completely expected, justified and acceptable. You're inventing outrage.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 11:13 AM
7

Maybe, but that's not what you said. Can you explain why it is unacceptable and displays a hatred of women to hit someone who hit someone else twice? I'd really love to hear that fucked up and sexist argumentation.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 08:17 AM
10

A couple of years ago I was assaulted by four guys who threatened me and spit in my face for no reason. I called the police afterward, and the guy I talked to was very understanding and said I had every right to report it, but that he had to warn me - it was night, there were no witnesses, and they were four, I was one. So realistically there would be almost no chance of getting a conviction. And I completely understood that. He wasn't oppressing me, that's just how civilized justice systems wor…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 10:20 AM
3

Thanks for repeating the title.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:17 AM
8

Ffs, it's cue.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:58 AM
3

No one is saying racism doesn't exist, moron. But individual racism is not the same as oppression. You're not even attempting to argue your own claim.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 06:14 AM
8

Hypocrite* Hippocrite would mean "horse judge".
/r/MensRights29/06/20 05:43 AM
1

I wasn't commenting on that. But if you want to make a genuine counterpoint, at least represent what you're replying to honestly.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 12:50 PM
1

That's not what he said. He said fighting chance. Anyone can do harm to someone who doesn't defend himself.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/20 04:36 AM
5

I think you misread. It said pluralize, not generalize.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 05:21 AM
3

Being bi doesn't help much - all the same points go for men as well. But if you're happy enough alone, great. I hope you become happy no matter what you choose. I'm only saying, if you want a relationship, you're going to have to risk something by putting effort into it, even before you know if you'll get the same back. That's just how that game works, and you'll only add to the suckiness of it by becoming cynical and expecting the worst. And there's nothing wrong with someone loving you for wha…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:36 PM
4

That's the wrong way of looking at it, mate. Eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind and all that. This way, if and when you meet a woman who does want to give back, she'll say the same thing about you: "why should I be expected to provide anything when he doesn't?" I know it sucks, but the only way to go about it (other than going full mgtow) is to give it your best to begin with. If she just takes without giving back, you've got the wrong one. Put her back in the sea. The good women are …
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:02 PM
7

Wait, what exactly do you consider "who he is" if not that? All relationships are based on providing things for each other. Providing companionship, positive feelings, emotional support, entertainment, sex, etc. No one loves anyone just because they exist somewhere without doing anything. There's nothing wrong with that, that's what a relationship is. There's only something wrong if the providing is one sided.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:20 PM
30

Yeah, I've been assaulted 9 times (5 if we only count actual punches, the rest is spitting and aggressive shoving) in my adult life so far, and I live in one of the safest countries. Granted, I've probably been a bit unlucky in that regard, but not many of my male friends can say they've never experienced any violence.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 11:14 AM
6

Sad that you're downvoted. Hate speech is a silly and dangerous concept, and this place should be supporting free speech.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 12:39 PM
20

What? Where did you even get financially dependent from?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 03:18 PM
113

Whiteknights will find a way.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/20 05:46 PM
6

Just that one, though. The rest are even more deluded than I expected. Especially this one: I know I’m gonna get downvoted for this but They called an all white female group “diverse” So, so close to self-awareness, and yet so far.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:51 PM
15

Seems we need to trot this speech out again. It's a common myth, but no, feminism was never about equality.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 07:21 AM
9

Wow, great argument. You certainly sound like someone worth having a discussion with. I especially liked the part where you correctly represented something I said. Oh wait, that didn't happen?
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:22 PM
10

Of course that wouldn't happen overnight. That's not how those things work at all. Doesn't mean wages aren't dictated by supply and demand, though, especially in jobs like teaching that don't produce any direct value.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:11 PM
12

Why? I mean, for one we already know why (if we assume the premise is true, that they are undervalued): supply and demand. If far fewer people wanted to work as these things, the pay would naturally rise to attract workers. And secondly, why would that make any difference to anything? Nothing is stopping women from choosing different and higher paying professions.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 11:35 AM
2

Exactly. There are those who whine about not being able to - and there are those who just do it. Hiring by gender alone only ensures you get some from the former group.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 08:47 AM
9

Yeah, I had a female CEO in my previous job. She was fucking amazing. Like a hamster on coffee, she couldn't sit still for a second, talked twice as fast as anyone else (though always about relevant things), and she single-handedly took the company from teetering on bankruptcy to doubling the number of employees to 200 in two years. I never once heard her talk about patriarchy or complain about being held down as a woman, though. She just did stuff.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 08:42 AM
2

I find it funny how you couldn't actually respond to anything, but just resorted to calling me an incel for stating facts - and now it's just an evil sub that's persecuting you. Buddy... Feminism didn't save women from being property. It just didn't. You disliking that fact doesn't make it wrong, nor does it make people who accept it incels. Get over yourself, seriously.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 05:50 PM
11

Men couldn't vote in most countries either less than 300 years ago. Usually only land owners or nobles could. That's the one part feminists usually "forget" to mention. And yes, women are, and have been, treated as property in some regions of the world, namely the most strongly religious ones, and haven't historically been entirely equal. None of this was even mentioned, though - no one said anything different. But how did feminists stop this? Women were most definitely not property in western n…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 05:54 AM
8

Ah, the thing were women have mostly been a part of societies, had jobs, had their opinions heard and in general not been treated as property? The thing that completely contradicts what he said? That thing? Edit: And the thing that in no way explains how feminists supposedly caused this lack of being property?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 05:43 AM
1

You mean the part of human history that doesn't exist?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 05:41 AM
12

That's... not even close to true. Where did you get that ridiculous idea?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 05:28 AM
0

Uh... I think you might have forgotten that you were the one who (incorrectly) corrected that misspelling, not me. You are insulting yourself right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/20 04:50 AM
1

Have you considered spending the 0.5 seconds googling a word before correcting someone so you don't look like an idiot?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 07:35 AM
17

No one said she was good at maths.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 08:01 AM
0

"Sorry guys, even though you've done something really great, you happen to share genitals with someone who did something bad, so nothing you do will ever be worth celebration. ... What's that? You could also say 'humans protect from humans, so no human is ever worth celebration'? Nah, that doesn't apply because reasons. Only men are bad!"
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:44 PM
2

Do you have even the faintest idea what gaslighting means? Because it seems like a completely random thing to say in this context.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:42 PM
5

Fair. I have never seen that, but I'm obviously not going to deny it has happened somewhere. Doesn't seem like a specific problem to me, though. Some people are just assholes in all sorts of different ways.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:49 PM
9

'man-spreading' which i think is an issue Why?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:45 PM
7

There are far more rapists in the world than women who lie about rape Says who? How do you know? 1,000s of rape cases occur of which only very few turn out like this one That's true. Most of them result in no convictions either way, because rape is notoriously hard to prove. There are rarely witnesses, and the physical evidence can't usually distinguish between consensual sex and rape. It's theoretically possible that all of these tossed cases were women lying. I don't know. You don't know. The …
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:48 PM
3

You seem to be equating "feminists are trash" to "men are trash". That's either dishonest or stupid.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:41 PM
1

If you want to be reasonably expected not to be a father don't have sex If you want to reasonably expect to not get run over by a car, don't go outside your house. It's really that simple. Still the same argument, and still stupid. And the primary purpose of sex IS reproduction Biological purpose, perhaps, but how is that relevant? Are you actually saying that people shouldn't do things that aren't in line with their biological purpose? Using a keyboard or a phone isn't the "biological purpose" …
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:20 PM
0

No it isn't. That's not the point you've been arguing these last comments, where you claimed sex is only for reproduction. And your original claim was that people deserve things that happen to them, regardless of whether they did what could reasonably be expected of them to prevent it.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:54 PM
4

That's not an argument. But are you honestly going to tell me that you've never in your life done anything just because it felt good? You only do things that have actual utility for the species? Of course if you say no you've refuted your own argument, and if you say yes you're lying.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:28 PM
4

No, it isn't. I'm sure you'll find out when you reach puberty. Okay, that was a cheap shot, but I really don't know how anyone would seriously claim that sex is only for reproduction if they're more than 12 years old. That's just hilariously absurd.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:25 PM
4

That's exactly the same as saying that if you go outside your house and get hit by a car, you deserve what you get. 99.999% of sex isn't for reproduction. That's an idiotic thing to say.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 03:57 PM
3

And if you don't want to get run over by a car, never leave your house. Not that men shouldn't try to prevent accidental pregnancies they aren't interested in. But sometimes things happen.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 03:34 PM
2

Those women aren't feminists then No true Scotsman fallacy. If you look up feminism it's defined as a range of social movements, political movements, and ideologies that aim to define, establish, and achieve the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes And movements are not defined by dictionaries, but by their actions. Feminism has never been for the pure equality of both sexes. Ever since the beginnings in the early 1800s, feminism has been seeped in man-hatred and femal…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 04:27 PM
1

I'm not saying it represents the group, I'm saying it doesn't make sense to single out feminism as being for choice, as opposed to other groups, when those other groups (or non-groups) are more for that choice than feminism is. The fact that you haven't heard the argument being made doesn't change anything. It has been made by many feminists and by well known and representative feminists. The anecdotal evidence is from your side, not mine. You seem to think your personal experience is evidence t…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 04:14 PM
1

No, that's not my logic either. You certainly spend a lot of time telling others what they think, don't you? To use your analogy: if 10% of Christians believed in murdering abortion doctors, and 0% of all other groups did, it wouldn't make any sense to say "Christianity is all about not murdering abortion doctors". Get it now?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 03:34 PM
1

Or, alternatively, she got downvoted because she said this choice was what feminism was all about, which is just flatly false. But nah. Much easier to just call everyone who disagrees with you incels. That way you'll never be wrong about anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 03:28 PM
2

Your anecdote doesn't really mean disagreement with what I said. I know there's a certain subset of feminists that actually want equality - and that's fine. But you can't claim "feminism is all about choice", when most likely a larger portion of feminists than any other mainstream group is against it.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 03:24 PM
1

That would certainly explain why I didn't say that, wouldn't it? The person I replied to said that feminism was about the ability to choose. That doesn't make any sense when the only group of which a certain portion is against women's ability to choose to stay at home is feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/20 03:21 PM
16

Feminism is about the ability to choose. If you want to stay home and be a housewife - go for it! It's not, though. The only people telling women they shouldn't be stay-at-homes are feminists, and it's a very common opinion in the feminist movement that women must work and be independent.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/20 02:07 PM
2

Well, yes. I completely agree with that. Men certainly have some advantages and women have others. It just annoys me when it's set up like being a man is entirely privilege and being a woman is not, etc. Sounds like you're smarter than that, so...
/r/MensRights20/01/20 08:11 PM
4

I'm much stronger than the average woman. I can build muscle with ease (compared to women). But what's the point of that? To be able to defend yourself? In that case, isn't it more of a privilege that women are much less likely for someone else to use that strength against them in an attack, especially without holding back? Men are more or less forced to build up that strength if they want to be safe, while women are much less likely to be assaulted, and can usually count on men to help them if …
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:27 PM
5

Not everything they've done is terrible, and obviously there are a lot of earnest people in the movement, who have fallen for the constant lies about how oppressed western women are and genuinely believe they are working for a better world. I have every respect for those people, especially if they are open minded enough to hear other viewpoints. But the feminist movement as a whole has never been for equality. Yes, they've tried to make things better for women, but never not at the direct expens…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:48 AM
4

if it ever truly was Spoiler alert: it wasn't.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 08:19 AM
11

Also define "fear" in this context, because I'm like 99.9% certain they don't really mean fear, but more something like "dislike" or even "are not particularly attracted to".
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:30 AM
11

Hahah, you actually believe women are less insecure than men in general? Jesus, you fucking neckbeard. Have you ever met a woman?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/20 06:43 AM
8

a society that already very much caters to their very way of life. Uh-huh. Want to tell us how?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 07:51 PM
8

Can one of you explain to me what it actually means to be entitled to women? Because I still don't get it. To me, feeling entitled to women would be going up to a random woman and saying "hey you, you're mildly attractive, I want to fuck you - come along now", but literally no one does that, and no one has since perhaps some lords in feudal times. And they treated men the same. I keep hearing this, and I just have no clue whatsoever what it means.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:54 PM
2

Another person who needs to read this. No, feminism was never good.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:11 PM
1

62 upvotes now, so apparently people keep upvoting it even after two comments have mentioned how it's completely nonsensical. … Reddit.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 03:12 PM
173

This isn't really about women's rights, though. Neither women nor men ever had a right to be believed without question, and they shouldn't have. This is all about the fight for women's special privileges.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 08:31 PM
26

Exactly. It kind of annoys me that so many, even on the general anti-feminist side of things, still believe the cancer-feminism is a recent development; that the first generations were good and all about equality, and only the 3rd and 4th waves have brought the man-hating, hypocritical mess we see now. No. This was never the case. Feminism was, from the very start, all about female privilege and punishing men for perceived oppression that never existed the way they imagined it. There was a reall…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:44 AM
5

/r/awfuleyebrows
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:45 AM
4

It is however simple when you consider the fact that it's just a question of body autonomy That's not a fact, though, that's an opinion. And it's one I disagree with, which was my whole point. Again, I am pro-choice, but the main reason is that I think it's far better for a potential future child to never experience life in the first place, than to have a life with parents who didn't want it and are likely going to make it feel that - and who might not even have the means to support this child. …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:23 PM
3

Sure, that's a bit paradoxical. I also think that if you're responsible for someone needing blood, like if you hit them with your car or something, you should be required to give blood or anything else that's harmless to you if it could help them. I'm fine with someone disagreeing with that, but again it's not a simple right-or-wrong, black and white question, like many people want to pretend the abortion issue is.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:38 PM
6

You can't be forced to give blood to save someone's life so why should a woman be forced to give her body for 9 months? That's kind of a bad analogy, because in most cases there's no connection between the two people here, no reason the potential donor should have any responsibility. But someone who gets pregnant does have a certain degree of responsibility and connection. They caused the situation in the first place. Well, they were half of the cause, anyway. To me, a more apt analogy would be …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:13 AM
1

No it's not. Those are two completely different words. One means lining up, one means a signal to set in motion. Obviously "cue" was the word he meant, not "queue". And wait, you think Oxford is American? Are you trolling?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:58 PM
3

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/cue
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:11 PM
11

Cue* Que is Spanish or short for Quebec, but otherwise not an English word.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:13 AM
7

It's only "disheartening" because you're deliberately completely misinterpreting what they say. No one actually said any of the shit you two are accusing them of. How is it not apparent that claiming women want easy jobs is sexist as fuck Because it's just a fact. The statistics speak for themselves. And there's nothing wrong with that - I personally would like an easy job too, why wouldn't I? The only problem is complaining about lack of representation in top jobs while ignoring the same for th…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:57 AM
29

You should just be honest and call this place Men Who Hate Feminist Would there be something wrong with that, though? Modern mainstream feminism is very often actively trying to take rights and equal status away from men to give privileges to women, so I don't really see how you could be for men's rights or egalitarianism (which I would personally subscribe to) without being opposed to modern feminism. Even if you don't agree with that, "hating" feminism is in absolutely no way the same as hatin…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:47 PM
1

Unless they're Asari.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/19 11:24 AM
2

The question is clearly meant as a moral one of does she deserve consequences, rather than a pragmatic one of is there enough evidence to charge. I can't believe this needs to be explained. Think, /u/chambertlo. It's not that hard.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 04:22 PM
3

According to whom? That's literally never been what mainstream feminism was about, in any of the so-called waves.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/19 09:08 AM
1

150% - But I have no idea what your point is. Taxes don't apply to only women.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:28 PM
10

I'm just going to chime in from Denmark here. We have 52 weeks of government mandated paid parental leave. Child care isn't free, but you get most of it covered by the government. Not to mention the standard stuff, like a 37 hour standard work week, 6 weeks of vacation, excellent worker rights, usually 3-9 months notice (depending on how long you've been in a job) and of course completely free education. You want to guess how many women we have in STEM? About the same proportion as in the US. As…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:43 AM
25

Your example is a bit absurd though. Everyone knows Bob doesn't even like coffee.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:28 PM
14

You know, except everyone in that huge part of the world where it isn't normal to do. And have you ever actually seen one? Because when erect, they don't really look that different to a cut one, as the foreskin retracts behind the head.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 12:47 PM
491

I don't mean to nitpick, but this still implies that men are bad, only that it's not their own fault. I don't agree with that. There's nothing wrong with men as a whole or masculinity today. In my experience, the women who typically say things like "where have the good men gone?" are the kinds who want their men to be equal to them, but somehow still be chivalrous and treat them like princesses. This isn't a problem with men, it's a problem with those women, and they should just be ignored.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:31 PM
13

What? I really have no idea what you are trying to say here.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:40 PM
10

So you're saying all Trump supporters are racists, then? Including the ones of other races?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:38 AM
5

If you're referring to that border control thing that was in Time magazine, you know that kid was never actually in a cage, right?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 05:51 PM
2

Yep, there it is - the dumbest thing I'll read today.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 11:06 AM
1

What percentage of this is men on men crime. What? Why does that even matter? Is she saying that if a higher number of people who commit the same crime as you, also have the same genitals as you, you are somehow more guilty of the crime you just committed? How does that make any sense?
/r/MensRights23/11/18 09:19 AM
2

Of course she deserves equal rights - including the "right" to be charged for her crimes. What is this shit?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:28 AM
8

Well, you probably shouldn't, because "whore" has colloquially meant someone sexually promiscuous for a very long time. Not just actual prostitutes.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:34 AM
13

I have better things to do with my life. Clearly not, seeing as you've wasted far more time being a cunt and yelling at everyone asking for the specific statistic you were referring to.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:06 AM
1

Honestly, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you were a troll and not really that incredibly stupid. If I have to explain it to you, here's a hint. I used your words. If I was insulting, then by definition so were you. And do I really have to explain to you that I don't think you were insulting me personally, since I wasn't even in the thread before that point, so that would be literally impossible? Sometimes it doesn't hurt to think for yourself for a second.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:31 AM
3

Wait, you actually think you've done more than insult and make shit up? Hah. That's cute.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:58 PM
3

Kanye acts like a controversial dick to stay relevant While you act like a controversial dick and still don't manage to be relevant.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:46 PM
6

There is no UN Men Why post anything at all when the results show there is absolutely no problem that specifically harms women here?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 10:54 AM
7

How does any of this in any way constitute hatred of women?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:28 PM
1

But only about 1% of breast cancer cases are in men.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:27 PM
4

It should be never hit anybody ... except in self-defence or defence of others. But yeah.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:38 PM
2

It was originally phrased on paper by communist philosopher Charles Fourier, who thought being a homemaker was equivalent to slavery, and defined feminism as "liberating" women in an effort to eliminate the lies and immorality of capitalism and commerce. If you're referring to the definition commonly seen today about equality of the sexes, then that's a much more recent invention, and not by anyone with any arguable authority over the term.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:08 PM
4

What does "in its pure form" even mean? If you're talking about the first generation feminists, then no. They were never for equality, ever. Look up the white feather campaign, Seneca falls, Emmeline Pankhurst, etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:01 AM
2

I still think any good rights group has to respect others. It's fine to only want to further the goals of your particular group, but not if you downright step on others to achieve them.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 06:10 PM
22

Actually they didn't focus on equal rights, they were almost as sexist and toxic as the modern version. It's a commonly parroted phrase that only third wave feminism is bad, but look up the White Feather campaign, Seneca Falls, etc. The unfortunate truth is that feminism has never been a campaign for equality, it has always been about furthering women's goals only and not giving a damn about men, or even women who didn't toe the line. It can easily be argued that in the early days of feminism, a…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 09:21 AM
12

Subjective doesn't mean entirely arbitrary, though. There's still a basic definition of the term; in this case a woman using her gender to achieve some sort of privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 07:41 AM
15

To deny a PP there must have been a PP in the first place. I would think that was rather obvious.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 07:18 AM
16

Depends what you mean by "hurt", I guess. If you're counting raw numbers of subscribers, you're right. But if you think there's a purpose to categorization, and every sub shouldn't just be a copy of /r/funny, then not so much.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 07:14 AM
16

It's possible I suppose, but it's a common theme all across reddit: people upvote what they like or agree with, and pay zero attention to whether it actually fits the context of the sub it's in. This is exactly why moderators are needed. If you could just trust the votes to do all the work, you wouldn't need to be here at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 06:51 AM
3

Site of blood? Really?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 07:21 AM
8

Hippo's what?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/17 08:45 AM
4

Why? Not saying he's necessarily right, but he did just demonstrate how your analogy didn't make any clear point. Just because two things share a number of characteristics, it doesn't make them equal. Seems to me like an excellent starting point for further debate, and throwing your hands up and going "no point in this" really came out of nowhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 08:18 AM
2

left wing
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/17 07:59 AM
6

More like bogans. It's Australia.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 05:00 PM
2

It's an analogy, not a simile. Analogies generally work best when using extreme cases that nevertheless still fit the premises of the argument. The point is that just because two things share one property - in this case being fatal - it doesn't mean they're the same. Higher speed means higher risk of dying, higher risk of hurting others, higher risk of the accident spreading over a larger area. You can't just say that because you can die from going over 75, then any speed above that makes no dif…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/16 05:49 PM
4

So, because a knife and a nuclear bomb can both be fatal, there's literally no difference between them?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/16 04:40 PM
6

a women Why is this mistake suddenly so common?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 12:07 PM
5

That does not make saying all woman are childish is okay. He didn't do that at all, though. He very clearly said feminists. Not that I necessarily agree with him, but you are making a far more harmful mistake by conflating women and feminists. They are not the same.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:59 AM
1

Can't find the poll itself just now, but it was done for this show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgJFFDz0LOo It's mentioned about 1:20 in.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:39 PM
1

that doesn't mean that the majority of us are feminists. Actually, Epinion did a poll for DR/SVT1 (Danish and Swedish tv channels) that found 52% of Swedes identify as feminists. So that really is the majority of you.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 01:22 PM
3

I don't think you're understanding much of anything here. How does one of several effects of an action prove the intent behind that action? If a country were to jail a murderer who likes Nickelback, does that somehow prove that society is afraid to hear his opinions on Nickelback? I mean, it's possible, but far more likely they just want to lock up a murderer.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/16 06:31 AM
3

And how does downvoting show that?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/16 06:43 PM
3

How?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/16 01:39 PM
5

I'm enjoying how riled up everyone is after I gave them a reality check. /r/iamverysmart
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/16 01:38 PM
2

Im a dude Well, then that's exactly the point GeReT was making. As a dude, you haven't been treated as a victim your entire life, and most likely haven't acted like one constantly. How does your experience show that it's a gender thing and not a victim culture thing?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/16 01:34 PM
6

Well, women are (on average of course. Always on average) physically inferior to men. That's just a fact, but if you take that to mean women are inferior to men in general, I'd say you're reading too much into it. "You" in this case meaning the hypothetical person doing it, not you you.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:14 PM
4

Valid question. I don't think anyone is blaming them, however. And if feminists would admit to only caring about women, this would not be an issue. The issue is that most feminists staunchly insist that anyone who cares about equality is a feminist, and egalitarianism and MRM are unnecessary because feminism already covers it. But at the same time they never say a single word when the same problems they rave about in women apply to men.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:42 PM
1

Now I have this image in my head of the men at my work having a blow up sex doll party.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:37 PM
19

Wow, so progressive!
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:00 PM
6

Feminists don't think white men SHOULD be treated as lesser. That's a straight out lie. Uh… no it's not. Notice I didn't actually say "feminists", as if I were talking about all of them, I specifically said "a lot of feminists". And a lot of feminists do think men should: shut up and not be heard, die, have no reproductive rights or rights to their own children, not be hired for jobs even if they're better than female applicants, etc. etc. So no, if anyone here is lying, it's you. At the very le…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:45 PM
11

A problem with that is that a lot of feminists do believe some people should be treated as lesser, specifically white men. So we're really going to need a definition of feminism to go with for this topic, before this question can be answered. If we're going by the dictionary definition, that feminism is simply the equal treatment of all genders, then I completely agree with it. It's just that in that case, every feminist I've known or heard about is not really a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:32 PM
-1

Don't mean to be rude, but you did it three times in that comment, and it does make it a bit harder to read: "You're" is short for "you are". "Your" is possessive, and means the following word belongs to you.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:12 AM
2

That's just an opinion piece by CHS. Not that it makes it wrong in any way, but it doesn't mean Time magazine (or the website) supports it.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:53 AM
2

Well, it doesn't mean you're asking for it. It just means you might be increasing your risk. Important distinction.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:03 AM
4

Of course. I didn't mean to imply society is something that just pops out of nowhere. Contrary to what SJWs seem to believe, most societal expectations have some sort of root in biology, psychology or sometimes even common sense. Doesn't change the point here, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/15 08:12 AM
131

Women are generally not used to rejection, because society still expects men to take the first step every time.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 04:41 PM
1

Now it just means adult male human When on its own in an English sentence, yes. But not in words like "human", "mankind", "policeman", etc, which is what is being talked about here. Those have never meant anything related to male.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:39 AM
26

if you have a jealous gf/wife, such an event could pretty much destroy your relationship. I get what you're saying, but if your gf/wife would be angry or leave you over some women rubbing against you when you were very clearly passed out, then good riddance to her. SJWs have made me hate the term "victim blaming", but that's just insane.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 06:08 AM
9

Please don't conflate women and feminism. Being against feminism does not in any way mean you are against women. To flip a tired cliché: "feminism harms women too".
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:10 AM
3

Haha. You seem to be under the misconception there's anyone a feminist can't hate.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:34 AM
4

So you're telling me that if you were on this train with your child you'd be okay with your kid staring her down and playing 20 questions with you? I'm not the person you asked, but yes. Completely. But of course I'm from a country where we generally aren't terrified of the human body (or "bad words"). Children are not damaged by seeing an arse or a tit.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/15 11:32 AM
13

‘I trusted someone I should not have trusted. He was very drunk, blind drunk. He completely overstepped the mark. I was shocked,’ she said. Wait, if he was blind drunk, didn't she rape him?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:26 AM
-2

Sounds like the wongbandit was killed.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:22 AM
12

Where does it say in the article that the guy had legitimate reasons to be on campus? Did that actually sound smart in your head? You want proof that someone didn't do anything wrong to refrain from starting a witch hunt?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:31 AM
482

Sulkowicz wrote: 'I think it's ridiculous that Paul would sue not only the school but one of my past professors for allowing me to make an art piece. An art piece? A fucking art piece? Even if her claims were true, that's the most unbelievably cunty way of defending an attack on another person.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:29 AM
76

Because I believe the world should be safe for girls Yeah, that sounds exactly like the feminism I know. It should be safe for girls. Just girls, despite that fact that girls/women are already twice as safe as men in general.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/14 05:59 PM
8

That is. Not how periods. Work.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:19 AM
28

I'd go so far as to say the biggest obstacle to achieving equality in the western world today is modern feminism and its retarded cousin, the social justice movement. The idea was fine once, but few things influential have a lower opinion of women than feminism, and few things enforce male gender roles more.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:30 PM
8

and be against women ...Wat? You think we're against women? Where do you get these crazy ideas? Sorry, feminism. Same thing No, feminism is not the same thing as women. That's even more crazy. empowering women=feminisim. Well, yes, exactly. At the cost of men, and in areas where women don't need any empowerment, because they're already equal. Also, completely ignoring - or downright denying - that men have any problems at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:53 PM
8

how is equality so difficult for you? It isn't. It's exactly what most here want, and that's exactly why we don't support modern feminism. Your childish insults really do you no credit. If you don't care about making a point, why even spend time writing these comments?
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:35 PM
25

I don't think most guys could even get an erection when a woman is terrified or in pain. Hell, I can't even get off on Asian porn, because it almost always sounds like the girl is crying. ...TMI?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:49 PM
1

I might be mistaken, but I'm fairly certain I never said anything of the sort. My point was that condoms are so safe that the small chance of them breaking, divided by the tiny chance of any girl turning out to be a manipulative bitch who'll trick you into having kids, means that abstaining completely because of that is ridiculously paranoid. If you're that afraid of something bad happening, you can never leave your home - and you'll still be constantly terrified there. It's not "awesome" to be …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:50 PM
0

No, your husband is just overly paranoid if he thinks abstinence is the only way to be just reasonably safe from having unwanted babies forced on him by insane women.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:17 AM
7

it inherently means they are aware of your presents Well, shit, they were going to be a surprise. ...Sorry.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:12 PM
9

Why would she get double pene- oh... oh, death penalty.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:04 AM
1

I'm perfectly willing to change my mind if I see a good argument. But you continue to use the "there are worse things out there, so you shouldn't talk about this"-argument, which isn't very convincing and frankly hypocritical. Here you sit commenting on reddit while "truly important things are going on".
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:12 PM
1

So given the starving kids in Somalia right now, nobody's allowed to talk about lesser problems in our corner of the world, like the financial crisis, right? People will always be more concerned about what's going on around them than the shit half a world away. Call it whiny all you want, it's a fact of life. Turn on the news just once to see it in effect. - And honour killings are discussed there. They just talk most about what's closer to them. Just like everyone else - without a doubt includi…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:22 PM
2

From the r/atheism FAQ. Just because, you know, it answers that pretty well: Why do you focus on Christianity? Shouldn't you pick on all religions equally? Because we're communicating in English. Christianity is overwhelmingly the dominant religion in English-speaking countries, so that's the religion that English-speaking redditors encounter most. There are at least several stories submitted daily that touch on Islam, Judaism, Scientology, Mormonism and even Buddhism.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:33 PM
12

if it's a reddit about atheism, then how come all they talk about is god? Because atheism is a response to the idea of a god. If no one believed in a god, there would be no need for the term "atheist". Atheism makes no claims, it just refutes or denies those made by theists, and hence it's impossible to talk about atheism without talking about gods and those who believe in them. If any forum about atheism had to be strictly about atheism, the only conversation that could ever happen is: - Do you…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:25 PM
1

You're only pretending to be an idiot, right?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:57 AM
3

That's one example You're going to have to be a bit more specific, because I see exactly nothing in those comments shaming men for behaving in a particular way. Quite the opposite, they just don't want to be shamed for not behaving those ways. I do actually have very low opinions of unhealthy people. Right, congratulations. Now kindly explain how that's in any way relevant to men's rights? You don't have to like or even respect fat, lazy or otherwise unhealthy people, but that does not make them…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:43 PM
2

By shaming other men for enjoying activities that are considered manly in present and classical society But who's doing that? Some people may do that, yes, but it's not common in MR in my experience - and regardless, the solution to shaming is to stop shaming - not to shame the opposite, which is what you're doing. You are not more manly than some guy who works in an office and has never done anything life-threatening. You're both just men. No degrees. If your entire point is simply that you wan…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:25 PM
5

Ah yes, I forgot it's much better to say something stupid than shut up. A contrarian is usually someone who adopts the opposite opinion of the majority, regardless if it's reasonable. I'm not sure that's something you want to identify as, though it sounds rather fitting. The problem here isn't that you "dare" to state your opinion and not change it under pressure. The problem is that your opinion is uintelligent, unfounded and inflated. While I don't agree that being a brave idiot is better than…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:00 PM
5

we like being more manly than you Most of the time I see a comment or post from you, I wonder if you're a troll or just really fucking stupid. This is a perfect example of that. Are you really stupid enough to think this sort of condescending "real men do x, I define manliness"-crap would fly - let alone garner support - in here, or are you just trying to get downvoted?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:24 AM
2

Would you explain it to those of us who have apparently been living under rocks?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 11:40 PM
26

The sarcasm was pretty obvious here. Come on, people.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:53 AM
7

Really? So, have you heard the one about the nigger and the disgusting, filthy Jew?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:20 PM
1

I... have no idea how any of that contradicts anything I said. Yes, most men want to see women's tits. Most men do not want to see men's tits. A magazine for men that knows its target audience will be more likely to show women's tits than men's tits. What are you disagreeing with?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:34 PM
0

Because it's a men's magazine. That's like asking why a magazine for car enthusiasts has cars on the cover and claiming that's discrimination towards sewing machines. It's not that society thinks men should wear clothes and women shouldn't. It's that most men are attracted to women and not men. If women found the same things attractive as men, a women's magazine would likely be the other way around. That's not sexist, that's knowing your target audience.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:21 AM
1

No, it isn't. And please correct your punctuation - it's very hard to read like that.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:39 PM
20

What?
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:14 AM
1

I'm curious, what are those physical problems?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:15 PM
2

Shit, MLK went Godwin? Obviously he was wrong and we should take those rights away from the blacks again.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:13 AM
4

I'm not sure that can really be called a video.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:40 AM
14

SEXY. ...oh, we weren't one-word describing ourselves?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter