TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Commenting2 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Commenting2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

because males IQs on average are slightly higher than females depends on the study for the most part. not really the mainstream position and probably not true
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:01 AM
1

Make any sense? Can you provide context?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/17 10:22 PM
1

yes that's the point pretty much. Sex differences are small enough in many cases (with exceptions of course like eg sexuality) as to not really warrant making any inferences about the individual which imo is a good argument against discrimination
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/17 09:33 PM
1

Wouldn't mind that of course
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/17 09:20 PM
5

I like the "final note" from this article http://www.wiringthebrain.com/2016/01/sex-on-brain-tale-of-two-studies.html?m=1 A final note: why should we care? Why should we investigate sex differences in the brain? And if we find them, what are their implications for public policies? Many people are rightly concerned that demonstrations of biological differences in brain structure between males and females will be used to reinforce the idea of systematic differences in cognitive abilities and justi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/17 12:34 PM
1

Neuroskeptic has posted on the Kanazawa controversy. Don't think his data is sufficient to conclude black women less attractive http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2011/05/19/kanazawas-black-day/#.WYTDRyNCTqA Edit: see also this reanalysis by Kaufman and Wicherts https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beautiful-minds/201105/black-women-are-not-rated-less-attractive-our-independent-analysis-the
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:56 PM
1

Fair enough. I would bring this up in the Twitter thread but it's already a few days old and I can't be bothered
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 12:44 AM
1

I also read it as an endorsement and am kind of unsure now which is why I asked here. Maybe this part is to be interpreted less as "the burqa is good because it provides a mobile home for women" and more in the vein of "in those (oppressive) societies the burqa helps women because it provides them with a mobile home". Specifically stuff like "many saw it as liberating invention" (with many pertaining to Muslim women) makes me think this might be the proper interpretation. Might become clearer wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 12:16 AM
1

The book describes the burqa as a 'liberating invention' and a 'mobile home.' I only saw the excerpt Christina Hoff Sommers shared on Twitter. Andrew Sabisky - who isn't exactly an SJW or even left wing - disagrees with Sommers' interpretation of the text arguing that this is an explanation of why women want to wear a burqa in Muslim countries and not an endorsement of the burqa. Any thoughts on this disagreement?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/17 11:32 PM
0

That seems a good point and I will raise it the next time I see such a debate. Not the best person to argue this though because I'm not the one who has read the relevant papers
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 08:18 PM
0

All those HBD people keep telling me how parenting does not matter very much and low shared environment influence on pretty much all traits and outcomes seem to back them up here. I'm not sure how single mothers could be as harmful as they are often portrayed to be when long term effects are so small The usual point here is that worse outcomes for children of single mothers are due to having inherited the traits of their parents who ended up single mothers/divorced fathers in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:38 PM
1

Use of the word "far" is just misleading. There are very clear guidelines for interpreting cohen's d with 0.2 representing a small effect, 0.5 a medium/moderate one and 0.8 a large effect size. All the effect sizes in the big 5 traits are small to moderate from what I have seen e.g. p175 here Dunno about IQ variance. There has been a decline in the male-female ratio of topscorers in the math talent search SMPY but has remained relatively stable for some years now
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/17 09:41 AM
2

Mainly it has been found in several large child samples some of which comprised the entire population of Scotland. Data is less definitive for adults or in studies which employ a (likely superior) latent variable approach to measuring intelligence. That's why there are some doubts still
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/17 10:29 PM
6

It's the correct term. It (the male bell curve) is just slightly rather than much wider
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/17 09:27 PM
1

You use the word "far" far too often. Differences in personality traits are usually measured in cohen's d and for "big 5" all small to moderate. Men also likely have a slightly higher standard deviation in IQ, not a far higher one. Not sure on this though, not been found in several studies Regardless of culture is also wrong but seemingly gender differences are larger in more egalitarian societies
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/17 08:11 PM
1

Here is the problem: American women are the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot. I think this refutation needs some work. It's just an assertion without evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 04:56 PM
1

Thinking about it Kanazawa is actually the perfect example of a red pill academic
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 12:09 PM
4

If you want me to speculate it may be that women feel less pressure to pursue a career in a well paying field. Or alternatively that they are simply more likely to be interested in liberal arts and those just happen to pay less.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 12:44 AM
3

I think it's more that women are overrepresented in bullshit degrees and less that they are underrepresented in useful ones
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 11:16 PM
1

I suppose noticing some pattern about what either sex finds attractive about the other would be relevant in the context of this subreddit even if many men and women aren't going to fit this pattern. That's at least how my argument would best apply in the context of purplepilldebate
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:57 PM
1

That's probably true for some redpillers but I do hope that "illimitablemen" is a mature and experienced dude. Else he really shouldn't be teaching red pill knowledge
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:55 PM
1

Investigating average differences between two groups can still tell us something about society even if - as is the case with men and women - there is usually a huge amount of overlap. Tells you something about average group outcomes not about the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:02 AM
1

While I agree obviously this kind of talk would shut down a lot of other discussions on purplepilldebate as well and isn't always accepted as an argument I think
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 12:59 AM
6

I'm not sure about "all red pillers" but the main sub is sometimes certainly a woman-hating circlejerk. I just wanted to thank you for sharing this post though. It is quite amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 12:48 AM
1

For IQ as a whole, men have a greater standard deviation see here There is definitely contradicting data. That's why it has not been proven (beyond a certain doubt at least) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616301003 IQ as a whole is also mostly an attempt at measuring g, the underlying factor, and how much males and females differ in variance (or mean) often depends on the test used to measure g Regardless of what specific areas of intelligence, men have a greater standa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/17 08:12 PM
1

I'd argue the red pill sub is mostly about getting laid/sexual strategy and self improvement but there is an obvious overlap between alt right crowds and red pillers. The red pill emphasizes innate gender differences a lot and the alt right is all about (supposedly) innate differences between groups of people
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:41 PM
0

Any club where you can't have mixed girls is a club that sucks. Surely the white identity will make up for it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:36 PM
1

At least he's stated that its a spectrum and he stated NAWALT... If I remember that video correctly it goes like "well I realize there is a spectrum and not all women are the same but they should definitely not get involved with politics and also women's rights was a mistake"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 08:11 PM
1

Really? Then what did I read the sidebar for?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 12:59 PM
1

Not completely sure about EQ. That was originally more of a marketing ploy and while it does have some predictive validity now it's certainly less than IQ (=GMA) tests. Agree otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 06:26 PM
3

Unless competitive drive and testosterone also make men perform better in prestigious roles an argument could be made that affirmative action is necessary to get high performing women into jobs that would otherwise be occupied by ruthless but low-performing men. If the mainstream consensus on sex difs in IQ is correct (same average, variance ratio between 1.10 and 1.20) should only matter for extremely high achievers. Don't know any professions with an average IQ high enough that sex would make …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 12:02 PM
2

Oh I didn't even notice. Thought this was actually meant to be inspiring
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 10:15 PM
3

Are you in class bored out of your mind? Ask the most impossibly retarded question imaginable. Stuck in an airport waiting for a connecting flight? Find out if a fatty knows how many calories are in her slop burger. Waiting in a long line? Tell the person behind about the nasty porn shoot you were in. Then insist on shaking their hand and patting them on the back. I don't think I can take this post seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 08:58 PM
3

Where are you people getting your data? According to what I have 37% of women voted Le Pen, but only 33% of men http://www.westmonster.com/le-pen-most-popular-amongst-young/
/r/MGTOW08/05/17 07:21 PM
1

Alright. I don't care all that much but I do not think attributing women's voting rights to feminism is a mistake. Typically when an advocacy group demands something and the people in power give in to that demand one acknowledges the role the group has played
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 06:03 PM
1

I see. I am not American and haven't really learned about this much. 19th amendment usually linked to women's voting rights in the US
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 05:51 PM
1

no one did. You implied feminists couldn't take any credit for the 19th amendment since it was male non-feminists who voted to pass it. Therefore I wondered which other way women could have gained the right to vote so that feminists could take full credit for it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 01:46 PM
1

Suffragettes demanded the right to vote and were granted it by the men in power. Specifically which other way did you have in mind for women to gain this right so feminists could actually take credit for it? Revolution?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 11:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter