TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Commercialtalk Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by Commercialtalk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Being a "financial servant" is no where even CLOSE to the emotional and physical trauma of rape. Give your fucking head a shake.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:15 PM
3

Words are powerful.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 06:00 PM
-1

Haha wut
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 01:41 AM
-6

Nah.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 04:40 AM
-12

Again, I feel like being remembered as an asshole and saying shit like "She's a whore", "waste of tits", "I'm glad she died", ect. Is a bit different. Especially since this article is pretty vague about the details of the whole situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 03:02 AM
-14

i think the difference here is that you want to be remember as an asshole. I doubt she'd want to be remembered with so much vitriol.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 02:20 AM
-17

Show a little fucking respect, asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 12:51 AM
62

You don't think this has the potential to help male victims?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:53 PM
161

Did you "men's right activists" ever think that this might actually help men too? If it was anonymous, men could also more comfortably come forward. But no, let's falsely accuse a bunch of random women because activism or something.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:56 PM
2

I understand what you are trying to say, but you cant compare the 2. Its not fair to ask a black person to stop existing cause it makes them uncomfortable but its entirely reasonable to ask someone to stop staring at you.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:37 AM
1

these 2 things dont compare, he cant help being black whereas you can help staring.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:24 AM
1

If black people made me feel unsafe, I don't have the right to demand they avoid me if I decide to stroll through South Central LA. this is true, however, the black person isnt doing anything to make you feel uncomfortable, he is simply being. People who stare/gawk/leer are actively doing something they dont have to do, to make you feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:41 PM
1

well its a good damn thing I dont live in the states. right of safe enjoymemt so to speak is this the same as feeling safe? Your right to look does not trump my right to feel safe.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:01 PM
1

well, where Im from both are recognized under law, so essentially yes I do have the right to feel comfortable. Why is it you get the right to make me uncomfortable but i dont have the right to feel comfortable and safe?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:36 PM
1

so many feminists ...no, many feminists I know hate the gender binary, myself included.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:42 PM
0

why did you say it then?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:54 PM
0

Right, So let me get this straight, YOU have the right to look where ever the fuck you want, but I dont have the right to wear what I want and feel comfortable or Get mad at the creep who is leering at me?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:03 PM
1

a MRA telling me to "man up" isnt that misandrist??
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:00 PM
-16

yeah thats why when you guys showed up all my comments went into the negatives.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:08 AM
-21

so what, Im doomed to leers if I happen to want to wear a low cut shirt? How is that fair? It just happens, Im not accentuating anything, im just wearing a god damn shirt. Do you want me to wear a burka so people leering at me wont be my fault?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:06 AM
-11

lol, you were being downvoted so you got your MRA buddies to become a downvote brigade, you mad.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:03 AM
-25

Lol looks like we have a downvote brigade!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:42 AM
21

yeah seddit isnt misogynistic at all.
/r/seduction12/03/12 06:43 PM
4

How is that a terrible example? In both cases the original, literal meaning is completely lost. That's the analogy. Can you explain what versatility has to do with it losing its original meaning? because: 1: it still retains its original meaning see: To fuck 2: Bitch only has so many meanings. The word fuck can mean almost anything Anyway, not that it matters, but versatile* (not trying to hold this one against you, but as a non-native speaker I always appreciate when people correct me) Yeah, i …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:08 AM
8

That's like saying you can't take sexual intercourse out of fuck Thats a terrible example, that is the most vercitle word, it can mean almost anything. Or that the expression "being a dick" is degrading to men. You dont think it is? you are an expert in slang I take it?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:20 AM
7

because you know they're right???
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:32 AM
26

You cant just take women completely out of bitch, It means female dog. Its assumed that when you call someone a bitch, it means stop acting like a woman, which means stop acting like less of a man, which means women are less then men.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:03 AM
2

Its called wack your ex, and you have the option to be either male or female. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccEVH_NOBqQ
/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:04 AM
5

How?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:25 AM
12

how does this make a difference?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 12:56 AM
24

so, its ok to make it seem all "females" are sperm jackers but not ok to call all men rapists?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:30 PM
3

where does it say 12 male students?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:56 PM
7

Man oh man, you are all up in this thread! Good on ya.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:10 AM
12

You people don't understand, I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me!
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:06 AM
0

yes everyone is sluts, but only some are shamed, Ive been called an asshole and i call guys cunts, no big D man.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 05:08 AM
19

all humans have assholes, genius.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 08:44 PM
1

haha i actually stopped awhile ago, I dont have that much patience XD
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:10 AM
4

what are you trying to tell me?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:29 PM
6

no, but its pretty much assumed. why would they say it other wise?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:28 PM
1

i dont think its very funny
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:28 PM
1

well, no you didnt actually, you made up a false scenario that proved nothing. Its your opinion, Im not going to provide evidence to disprove you if you wont even give me something substantial that proves what you've said. As ive said before Definition =/= evidence. Please give me something else, it would only help your opinion if you backed it up more
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:27 PM
1

well everyone in the dave chapelle audience thought it was funny, so it must be funny!
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:24 PM
3

I dont get to decide, I get to interpret based on your sentence structure and words. You can produce tone when reading too ya know.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:23 PM
5

yes...? GOD DAMN THOSE FILTHY LYING JEWS! but i dont hate all jews, just the filthy lying ones.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:21 PM
5

when someone starts an argument with me, I finish it. seems like a passionate statement to me boy-o
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:19 PM
1

I shan't proved evidence untill you show me some, I want you to tell me how calling every woman a liar does not mean the person hates them. A broad generalization (in the negative) seems like hatred to me. but can you prove that people who call all woman liars dont hate woman? nice try though this sounds smug.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:18 PM
1

humour me, Im curious
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:15 PM
10

What insults might those be? Sorry i meant condescending tones I don't consider linking to a word's definition "hard." Do you not realize that we are both arguing right now? You are as passionate about this conversation as I am, and if thats not the case, why are you still talking to me?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:13 PM
2

please tell me how a sandwich joke is funny, im dying to know.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:07 PM
4

Nice try though. cut the smug attitude and give me some real evidence, a census, survey, study, anything but the definition, It is not evidence. If you can find more than one thing to support your opinion then maybe we can get somewhere, but all you've given me is a definition. I need more man.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:06 PM
10

I have my reasons. NO SEE ITS DIFFERENT BECAUSE
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:02 PM
1

Thats all you've done too my friend, linking to a definition does not equate to evidence, sorry.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:01 PM
11

Hey man, you threw out the insults first, and you are arguing just as hard as I am, so dont pin this on me. Can you tell me whats funny about it then? Mr.Funnyman
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:59 PM
1

Believe what you want dude, this is my one and only account, and i said contempt slightly different. I just as surprised as you by the upvotes considering this is a mens rights thread.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:58 PM
15

Seems like the kind of person who makes those joke seriously has to have a contempt of woman
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:27 PM
6

not good enough
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:26 PM
2

you have no idea what you are talking about. You cant simplify such a complex idea.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:25 PM
12

to call all woman liars seems to be a fairly hateful thing to do. Seems like its a hateful thing to do to woman, therefore its a hatred of woman
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:21 PM
14

Just because some one uses a sandwich joke, doesnt mean they hate woman, but it is a misogynistic thing to do.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:17 PM
9

Not misogyny: Calling women names. Being pro-life. Calling every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar. And not every person that does that literally hates women. How do you know this? did you conduct a study?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:15 PM
16

What does this have to do with my statement? calling every single woman a liar who accuses someone of rape is a misogynistic thing to do. Its like if i said its not misandry if we assume all guys are rapists.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:13 PM
8

Id also like a citation for your original statement.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:11 PM
19

haha reply to that guy, cause i would also like to hear him answer.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:11 PM
17

but you gotta admit, not everyone who says those things hates woman, but a large majority of then do.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:23 PM
48

Calling every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar. hmmm...
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:47 AM
1

I mean gene wise its 50/50, but cell wise yeah woman have the advantage there
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:23 PM
12

we slaughter each and every feminist ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/11/11 09:28 PM
1

Alright, before we continue this debate let me just clarify one thing. I agree with you completely, there are some issue where men get the crap deal, as you mentioned. ( i'd also like to point out I was raised by my single parent dad so sometimes the courts aren't all bad) But saying that men are a repressed group who have no rights and woman have all the upper hand is not only ignorant but arrogant. Yes men have in bad in some ways but so do woman, in 2 different societal ways. In terms of powe…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:24 PM
1

the concept of self or "body" should never compete with money. Didnt want a kid? wear a condom. Also technically the woman only makes 50% of the child.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:34 AM
1

When a woman gets pregnant, she can keep the baby, abort the baby, or give it up for adoption. If she keeps it, she has the full force of the state to extract child support. Men have no reproductive rights or choices, only responsibilities. well for one thing the baby is in the woman, so it would make sense that she has the monopoly on the decisions for such things, the baby is apart of her body and a woman (as well as a man) has the right to decide what she does with her body. As for men paying…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter