TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Commitment69 Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Commitment69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

One quote, no data, not even an anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 04:59 PM
1

Tbf I am in the UK, I don't really know who this Gaetz guy is. But let's say hypothetically that there was a guy with (sexual) power and status, attractive to women, who got involved with human trafficking nonetheless. This doesn't disprove the thesis from TRP that women are attracted to power and status, and women's feeling attracted is the number 1 thing you should aim for. One individual man being fucked in the head doesn't prove anything, and there are plenty of high-status men who (likely t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 09:35 AM
3

Dude what Political power does not equal sexual status. The kind of power that women are attracted to is the power where you control your own life enough that you are permanently relaxed, unstressed and dominant. Nobody is getting tingles for Mitch McConnell. Secondly, spinning plates as a congressman or senator or whatever the hell you yanks call em would be a huge liability. Hence why they get caught with prostitutes so frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 09:19 AM
1

This post is so full of flowery emotive language and it makes me sick. TRP isn't something you can pick up and put down. TRP is the reality of sexual dynamics. Wishing that it were otherwise doesn't accomplish anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:59 AM
3

The point isn't that it has a measurable impact, the point is that women are evolutionarily programmed to seek a beta provider and an alpha lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:25 PM
4

They're not talking about physical fitness, they're talking about fitness of genes which manifest in high-T masculine face shapes. Read the paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:14 PM
5

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440410/ In line with previous findings, we found support for the hypothesis that the degree to which a woman’s romantic partner displays indicators of high-fitness genes affects women’s attractions to their own partner and other men at high fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 12:55 PM
7

I actually understand women, relationships and the importance of communication, so she will never 'suddenly' leave me 'out of nowhere' How many men have thought this, do you reckon, and then been blindsided? Now, if you're with a post-wall woman or you're significantly more attractive then her then maybe you're safe. But otherwise, you are not safe. Women don't give a fuck about communication or relationships or any of the other trappings of the beta bucks lifestyle. Not on a primal level. If th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 12:52 PM
11

You're completely, utterly wrong here. Women upgrade from their current package all the time. You have seen this happen before, you just don't recognise the signs. You also sound like a complete white knight bluepiller. Not every relationship ends because the man didn't make enough sacrifices. I'm willing to admit that parts of TRP are dogmatic, but the stuff on hypergamy are some of the harshest, truest lessons you can learn. She's not yours, it's just your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 11:57 AM
10

This isn't what hypergamy is. Hypergamy is having a multi year relationship, strong pair bond, and then she suddenly leaves you and moves on without a second thought. Hypergamy is women's need for beta bucks and alpha fucks. Hypergamy makes her more attracted to masculine faces when she's ovulating, and feminine faces when she's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 11:21 AM
33

I went from 1 match per week to 3 likes per day by following online guides and shelling out for tinder premium. Black and white edited photos that make you look interesting will get you places that your shitty, badly lit selfies will not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 02:01 PM
1

I mean if someone's not hot, doesn't have an interesting personality and isn't relationship material...no, you shouldn't want to have sex with them, regardless of how much money they throw around.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:47 PM
2

I mean, if you're equating splitting the bill with "not investing anything" while expecting sex, you're pretty much positioning women as prostitutes who trade sex for investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:22 PM
2

But sugaring is 2. When people talk about sugaring, they're talking about an older rich guy doing scenario 2. If you're just talking about the guy occasionally paying for stuff, that's not sugaring, that's dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 11:41 AM
3

You're talking about two very different things. Generous man occasionally pays for meals and drinks when out with friends, they occasionally also pay. Desperate man showers woman with gifts, meals, trips in the hope of having sex with her. She gives nothing in return. 1 is fine. 2 is absolutely pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 11:29 AM
4

Paying for company is worse than paying for sex. Deeply, deeply pathetic for a man to do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 11:08 AM
9

If you try and use a girl as a therapist, she will lose attraction for you. If you're weak enough to need ego boosts from women, they lose attraction to you. My unwillingness to invest emotionally or financially in relationships with women reflects the state of modern women. The modern woman does not give a fuck about any man's needs, so we shouldn't care about hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 11:06 AM
8

Parasites.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 10:28 AM
1

What hair restoration worked for you? Asking as a balding (slowly) 26 year old with a weird shaped head.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 12:36 PM
2

Really? As a Redpiller I love FDS content, I hope they're allowed to keep coming here and arguing their case.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 12:34 PM
5

I think you might just be really, really hot, and we're in a pandemic so they're getting turned on too easily. Doesn't excuse the immediate kissing though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 10:54 AM
15

Modern women are not worth the sacrifice of mountains of college debt and a 150k/yr job. Not even vaguely close.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 01:38 PM
5

As someone who was sexually assaulted by a female babysitter, you need to be careful of women with small children too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 01:00 PM
1

Even if you end up with someone fundamentally pathetic and miss out on people who you might be a better fit with, but who aren't willing to pay for everything? No criticism here, it's a viable strat. The only part of FDS which truly irks me is the acceptance that women should withhold sex from some men to extract their resources while happily fucking other guys. This is Red Pill 101 though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 01:51 PM
2

I think you're likely to scare off everyone who isn't a complete doormat if you go that route
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 01:30 PM
2

Boundaries like "make him pay for everything and always put you first in every situation" and "make him wait for sex while fucking other, more attractive men"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:33 AM
2

Incredibly good take
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 11:10 AM
1

And what time does he go to sleep? I'm not leading you anywhere, I'm just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 12:57 PM
1

What's his job, out of interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 12:34 PM
8

Theoretically yes, but statistically unlikely for a rich woman to marry a poor man, and unlikely that a (likely female) family judge would be as sympathetic to a man. This stuff is so one-way that when it was taught to me in law school, the (female) tutor just referred to the woman and the man rather than the "economically weaker party" and the "economically stronger party". She delighted in telling us that she often said to her husband (who was a banker of course, this woman having worked in co…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 02:19 PM
4

Summary is: prenups are persuasive but not legally binding and will be thrown out if she says she was pressured, circumstances changed, she wasn't given a full picture of the finances, she was ambushed before the wedding, she didn't get legal advice, it's not a balanced prenup, etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 02:08 PM
7

https://www.graysons.co.uk/advice/prenups-how-far-are-they-legally-binding/ Read up
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 02:04 PM
5

Lawyer
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 01:59 PM
7

Man. Marriage problem: I can spend most of my life slaving in a corporate job, and then have 50%+ plus stolen with the aid of the courts. Marriage solution: Enforceable prenups. In my country (UK), prenups are routinely thrown out. This solution isn't going to happen, so the correct approach is to not get married. LTR problem: diminishing returns. All of the good parts of a relationship come early (honeymoon stage, sex, etc). The sting in the tail is the endless manipulation and psychological ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 01:52 PM
1

They're not gonna ban a female sub, grow up
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 02:19 PM
1

Not a good plan at all m8 Life is finite, you will regret spending time that way
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 08:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter