TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Comowl Archive

View 0 posts and 129 comments by Comowl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm focusing on your extreme bias because your opinion/posts lost all validity when you were intentionally misleading in your post.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 02:46 PM
1

He did stop, obviously not as quickly as she wanted. But the narrative you were forcing on the story was because of your obvious bias. From the sound of it judging by your little story, she said "stop" and he obliged. That is not how it happened. You lose all credibility when your bias is so extreme. You could say I'm biased. If I hadn't kept their messages they could and would have fucked my life up without losing a night of sleep. All because they wanted to hurt me. Okay, so you clearly have y…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 03:13 PM
0

Not sure why you used race and not gender...which would have actually been analogous.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:29 PM
0

None of this explains why you said "she tells him to stop, he does" as if that is really all that happened. You're clearly giving insanely biased comments about this topic. Speculation on your part ("He probably...") and obvious bias.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:22 PM
1

They aren't sexist, per se. But they are showing examples. And the whole point was summed up at the end when they said that you should be calling girls 'pretty brilliant,' too. I never said that you shouldn't also be calling boys brilliant, although people tend to focus on other things about boys and not just their looks whereas girls are told they're 'so pretty' from the time they're super young. If that's all you focus on then you're missing a big aspect of raising a child. People on here frea…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:06 AM
1

First of all, this is purely anecdotal but I hear people call boys 'handsome' all of the time when they're babies/children. Second of all, telling your kids they're attractive really shouldn't be the focus of any parent. Sure, it's not a bad thing if you do it occasionally, as long as you're making sure to also tell them that they're capable, hard working and intelligent. But self confidence doesn't come from your parent's telling you that you're pretty/handsome. It comes from being encouraged i…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:17 PM
1

'Be careful with that. Hand it to your brother' is the issue there.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:17 PM
1

Why not just start calling boys good looking and attractive the same as the girls The point is that you shouldn't just praise children based on their looks because they will grow up thinking that that's where all of their worth comes from. Girls are called 'pretty' constantly, from the time they're babies. It isn't a good thing. So no, that wouldn't benefit boys.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:14 PM
1

They said to tell her that she's 'pretty brilliant too.' They are not saying to never call her pretty, but to make sure that you also tell her that she's useful and smart as well. It's really not that complicated.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:12 PM
-1

Jesus, you're really missing the point. It's not just about the word 'pretty.' It's also about them discouraging her to get dirty (when she was interested in looking at things) or discouraging her from using power tools and to hand it over to her brother. It's about treating girls differently than boys in an unfavorable way.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:09 PM
1

It says in the commercial "Isn't it time we tell her she's pretty brilliant too."
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:07 PM
1

Okay...but she was still able to be heard and the ancorwoman mentioned the fact that the mom was there. It wasn't some crazy editing tactic, it was a joke.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:07 PM
1

It's one thing to totally lose your mind and talk nonsense...cursing up a storm, whatever. It's quite another to tell someone who is trying to save your life to "do something useful and show your boobs." That is a clear, concise message, not someone talking nonsense. It's was insulting and totally devalued what she was doing, which was saving his damn life. He reduced her to nothing but a body part. It's shitty and no one gets a pass on being an asshole because they lost a limb.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:33 PM
1

The two are not connected in any way. People do not get passes for saying shitty things, regardless of what just happened to them. That's pretty ridiculous. Plenty of people are in that kind of situation every day and they don't all make shitty comments...nor should they. If he got his legs blown off and said something horribly racist, would that also be cool with you? What if it was a woman who had her legs blown off and she said "men did this to me, all men are terrible." Would she also get a …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:15 PM
1

Because of the fact that it's an article? It's not like we overheard her telling someone...it's an article.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:24 PM
0

I'm really not seeing what gave you that impression...
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:08 PM
0

Ah, I see...so now you're assuming that it was a joke. I'm not sure where you got that from...other than your own assumptions and attempt to defend the guy. I think the person who has a better idea what kind of intent was behind the words would be the person who was actually there. If 'gallows humor' is what the whole army thrives on, as you say (not just men, as you point out) then don't you think the medic in question would have understood it as a joke, if that's what it was? If my legs were b…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:56 PM
-4

Oh, please. It's not as if the article stated that he was hysterical, screaming and crying and I'm saying he should have 'sucked it up.' I never said he should be 'casual about it.' However, being in pain is not an excuse for shitty comments. If the medic was a guy, do you think the guy in question would have been asking to see his dick "because he was in pain"? I highly doubt it...because it's not like he was out of his mind.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:53 PM
-4

The article stated that the shot of morphine 'did little for him' so it doesn't sound like he was out of his mind high. I don't think being in pain is an excuse for making sexist comments that reduce someone who is trying to save your life to nothing but their boobs.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:35 PM
-5

But you have absolutely no idea what his mental state was at the time, you're just assuming something because of his gender and you want to be on his side regardless. One shot of morphine apparently 'did little' for him, so why are you assuming he was out of his mind? Plenty of people are given morphine or other drugs and do not sexually harass the people administering the shot. It was a shitty thing to say, and it reduces the nurse who was trying to help him to just a girl with boobs. By saying…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:49 PM
-6

Severe Alzheimer's is not the same as being in pain and having one shot of morphine.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:44 PM
0

Saying "do something useful and show me your boobs" is sexist. Being in pain is not an excuse.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:43 PM
1

Lol...it was not 'edited so you can't hear it.' The ancorwoman is speaking over the video...you can still heae the wife laughing faintly in the background.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:38 PM
1

Jesus, you're the reason people think /r/MensRights is a crazy place. The fact that you continue to say that she feels 'entitled' to things shows that you don't want equal rights, you just have a grudge against women in general.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:19 PM
0

It did say that they were in a relationship and it's pretty safe to assume that most people in relationships are in monogamous relationships. It's absolutely ridiculous for you to think that just because the article didn't specifically mention 'vows of faithfulness' that they weren't monogamous. Although the fact that you used "FAIL" in that way tells me you're about 14, so I guess that makes sense. That's why she was only a girlfriend rather than a wife, probably - he didn't want to take it bey…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:18 PM
0

But 'cheating' implies that it was agreed upon, and the guy took it upon himself to change that. That's the damn definition of cheating. You extreme mensrights people are hilarious, seeing how much you'll defend just because someone is of the male sex...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:02 PM
0

You don't need to be married to have 'vows of faithfulness' to each other. How ridiculous. I find it funny that we read the same article and yet what you got out of it was that she was 'just someone he was fucking.' Like you somehow know that that's all the relationship was, and that since they weren't married they couldn't possibly be committed to each other.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:00 PM
0

It's ridiculous to assume that most feminists rely on their parents for support. That is most definitely coming from a giant chip on your shoulder and nothing else.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:36 PM
2

You don't seem to get this. Your life would have been more difficult had you been black or gay because of the racism and homophobia that is still around. You have advantages to being white and straight because those are 2 things that you'll never have to deal with being harassed about. No one is saying your life will be perfect because of those things. The point is that it won't be more difficult because of them. You have a leg up on people who have to fight those things on a regular basis in th…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:34 PM
1

No one said anything about 'retaliating.' You said having different rights activists groups is a bad thing and I'm pointing out that history shows that isn't true.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:31 PM
1

You absolutely did not respond to the 'loving your girlfriend is emotional abuse' bit. It's funny...when people say "I'm done trying to rationalize with someone who fails to see reason," they they really mean is "I'm done trying to argue with someone who won't agree with me."
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:43 PM
1

There wasn't one to find in the first place. That's my point. I realize you're attempting to make a connection here but it really didn't land.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:42 PM
1

I am responding to what you're saying. You are not doing the same...which is evident by your lack of ability to show the "proof" you claim exists about people saying you're 'emotionally abusing your girlfriend by loving her.' If you recall, I asked for proof in the very beginning...and ironically, you cherry picked certain things to talk about while ignoring others. Other things such as the emotional abuse/love nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:36 PM
1

Wow. What a great way to ignore responding to things you clearly cannot respond to. Now I guess you'll never have to show "proof" that people think you're 'emotionally abusing your girlfriend by loving her.' Good thinking!
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:11 PM
0

I love how you cling onto one of the three and ignore the others. I can play that game too, but I prefer to take the intellectual high road. The reality that you take no time to actually read and comprehend the whole thing is really telling. Uh, what 'three' are you referring to? The Cathy Young quote was just her interpretation of the Dworkin quote. One woman's interpretation is not worth debating, don't you agree? Her denouncing the interpretation means that that isn't how she meant it. It's p…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:05 PM
1

But those outlets are still available, whether you claim men are 'socially punished' or not. You can go to therapy, you can talk to a friend or significant other. Some assholes might judge you but if they really care about you they won't, so why is it an issue?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:00 PM
1

Dworkin rejected that interpretation of her argument,[61] stating in a later interview that "I think both intercourse and sexual pleasure can and will survive equality"[62] and suggesting that the misunderstanding came about because of the very sexual ideology she was criticizing: "Since the paradigm for sex has been one of conquest, possession, and violation, I think many men believe they need an unfair advantage, which at its extreme would be called rape. I do not think they need it."[62] So t…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:30 PM
1

Oh, no. The burden of proof is on you. You made a claim and I asked for the proof of said claim. I am the one who is skeptical that those things are true and so why would I go on a wild goose chase? I'm asking you to provide the proof that's so clearly out there...in your mind.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:06 PM
-1

Okay, here's my question for you guys: If a woman posted this on TwoX and said that she was going to start recording every interaction with every guy because then she could prove that he raped her, or prove that he's lying, or whatever...how would you take it? Because I find it very hard to believe that you'd be on board. My guess is you would go off about how terrible it is that she's judging an entire gender based on a few bad guys. Yet you're all on board about this... Do you at least recogni…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:40 PM
0

This was not relevant at all. What does jazz music have to do with people talking about male privilege?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:34 PM
1

That me loving my SO is emotionally abusing her. That me speaking logically and rationally is abusing her. That consensual sex is rape and a reinforcement of the patriarchy and dominance and control by male genitalia... Please quote me where someone said that 'loving your significant other is abusing her' and 'consensual sex is rape.' Go ahead. I'll wait here.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:31 PM
1

That her daddy bough for hert..... Most likely. And here is where you sound just as bad as the people you berate. You just sound like someone who is bitter towards women and all credibility goes out the window. You sound ridiculous. I find very few feminists of this type actually support themselves. Do you really not see how completely anecdotal this is?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:29 PM
2

The 'privilege' refers to how society as a whole views you, not your family and personal issues.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:27 PM
2

Yeah, because the civil rights movement was such a waste of time.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:24 PM
-1

Oh, jesus...they were reporting on her claim as to why she did it, not stating those things as fact. Come on, use your head for 2 seconds.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:14 PM
1

You're not going to go up to your best buds and tell them anything. You're not going to say a word to your girlfriend/wife/whatever. Uh, why? There's no reason why you can't do those things. I'd question a relationship where you don't feel like you can be honest about how you feel. ...and you have no reasonable outlet as a man that many women have. You have exactly the same outlets that women have. You just wrote right before saying this that for some reason, you're 'not going to' take those out…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:04 PM
3

Not all circumcisions are done wit a knife.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:55 PM
2

Oh, jesus, It's a hypothetical situation created by someone. In this hypothetical situation, a man raped a woman. You want someone to write 'allegedly' in there, really? That's like changing a work of fiction. The person who wrote it wrote a scenario in which someone was raped. Nothing 'alleged' about it.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:56 PM
-1

That's pretty much my point. You're just making up a hypothetical situation and then pretending it's a fact.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:20 PM
-1

No, the reverse would be seen as an abusive person trying to kill their significant other...just as this situation is seen.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:09 PM
1

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:08 PM
-3

This is not a woman VS man issue...jesus christ, shit like this makes this subreddit seem nothing more than petty and woman-hating. I could post a ton of articles about men abusing women but what is the point? Yes, some people suck. But that is not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:01 PM
1

True, but I resist believing a significant amount of people think this way about others. Really? You really don't think that most people truly care about their siblings or significant others just as much as they care about themselves? What an odd way to view the world. Why should people need to evaluate why they value their own life over others'? Because valuing your life more than your significant other's or siblings seems pretty fucked up. Clearly you're fine with it, but it seems pretty stran…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:21 AM
1

Yes, I'm sure you can say that for certain and you're not just spouting generic crap that's just a broad generalization.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:20 AM
0

If one of thoe people were my significant other or brother, no, I would not have more of a stake in it. I would have exactly the same stake in it if it were them or me. That's pretty much my entire point.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:17 PM
0

Yes, they're victims of war in a very different way. As are the children of soldiers killed. I'm not sure why we have to measure everything in "who has it the worst!!11" The bottom line is, men, women and children are all victims of war. It sucks for everyone (in every country) and everyone has a stake in it.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:32 PM
0

Right, because adults never laugh out loud or tell people they're reaching too far when attempting to make two things connect that don't, in fact, connect! Nice job ignoring the real content though. Good middle school tactic.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:22 PM
-1

To say otherwise implies that women care more about men's lives than men do. Actually no, it's saying that a woman care just as much about her son's life, or her husband's life, or her brother's life as he does about his own. If you don't care just as much about your parent's or sibling's or significant other's life as your own then perhaps you need to evaluate why. And this is where you get downvoted Right, because assuming someone is 12 years old for downvoting the person they're having a disc…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:12 PM
1

Again, that's reaching. My point is that I think it's pretty ridiculous to have the childish "MEN are the primary victims!" "omg no, women are!" argument. The bottom line is both sexes have a vested interest and both sexes have an equal stake in it. Just because men would be the ones sent does not mean women don't have just as much of a stake in ending the draft. But I suppose you need this to be Men Vs. Women,
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:09 PM
-2

Lol...wow, you're really reaching with this one. First of all, being drafted ≠ being killed. But second of all, I'm saying that men and women are equally affected but in very different ways. Tragedy is tragedy, grief is grief. It's terrible for everyone involved and women have just as much of a stake in ending the draft for their sons, husbands ans brothers as men do. Are the consequences very different? Yes. But that doesn't mean that women care less or have any less of a stake. But again, you'…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:12 PM
-1

So...even though he said to me that what I said implied that women and men have an equal stake in it, he was justified in posting a quote where Hillary Clinton said that women have more of a stake in it? How is that relevant at all? Seriously, take off your blinders and think logically for 2 seconds. You might surprise yourself.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:02 PM
7

Nothing? Who gives a shit if some random person finds you creepy? Just don't bother talking to her. Not everything has to be some big crusade.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:07 PM
0

I don't really see how it was ever relevant since you just said that what I said implied that it was equal, not that women had it harder...but okay.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:08 PM
0

And if that implies that they are equal then why would you bring up the Hillary Clinton quote which claims that women are the primary victims? You're just attempting to start an argument where there is none, obviously.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:05 PM
0

I just don't agree. Are the consequences different? Yes. But I don't want my brother or boyfriend being forced to go into war any more than they want to be forced. It would be terrifying and devastating for both of us. Just because it's scarier for them because they are the ones who actually have to go, that doesn't mean I have any less of a stake in it. And if that implies that they are equal then why would you bring up the Hillary Clinton quote which claims that women are the primary victims? …
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:03 PM
1

Right, and again... If you think that losing a son of brother or husband to war isn't devastating, you're kidding yourself. Is it the same as being forced to go to war yourself? No, and I never said that it was. But pretending that they have no vested interest at all is just ridiculous. By bringing up the Hillary Clinton quote you're essentially trying to put those words in my mouth. I just clearly stated that it is not the same as being forced to go to war yourself, but that many women still ha…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:58 PM
0

Some guys make jokes about rape as do some women. That doesn't make it okay on either side. Why does one anecdotal screenshot condemn all women somehow?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:56 PM
1

That's great, except I didn't use the words 'primary victims' and that really changes the whole message. Women are affected by war and by the draft though. If you think that losing a son of brother or husband to war isn't devastating, you're kidding yourself. Is it the same as being forced to go to war yourself? No, and I never said that it was. But pretending that they have no vested interest at all is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:46 PM
0

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:39 PM
-2

Women still have just as much of a stake in it as men do, just in a different way. They don't want to see their sons or husbands forced into combat any more than the sons or husbands want to be forced to go. It's a waste of time to focus on this petition. Focus on ending the draft completely, not this nonsense.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:38 PM
9

Yes, you should lie to HR. That's the adult way to handle this situation.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:34 PM
7

Maybe she genuinely just finds you creepy. Maybe you just rub her the wrong way. It may not be because you're 'unattractive' (your words) or a man. Don't you sometimes get a weird/bad vibe from someone for no real reason?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:33 PM
1

Lol...I don't think the general population of circumcised men feel like they're missing something, deep down. It's actually pretty patronizing to say that.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:28 PM
2

Semantics.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:54 PM
1

But the difference is, that is simply their opinion that the fetus is a human at every stage. If they cannot comprehend that it's their opinion and not a fact then quite frankly, they're too pig headed to have any type of discussion with.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:11 PM
2

The argument of "we need to legalize X because if we don't people will still do it" is bogus. Why would that argument work for abortion if it doesn't work for murder, arson, assault, rape, bank fraud and countless other crimes? Because the fetus being a human being is up for debate. It is a person's opinion that a fetus at every stage is a human being, not a fact. Things like rape, arson, murder...those things are clear cut. Abortion is not. So you can't compare abortion to things like murder or…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:05 PM
4

But it's still worth discussing. You don't sound very open minded.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 11:48 AM
1

But again, I can admit that I have one. You are oblivious to yours, which is an issue.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:58 PM
0

This is a false statement. This is a blanket statement that is not at all true in all situations. It depends more on who made the money VS who cheated. Again, that is no society turning a 'blind eye.' Let's think about how people actually act when the topic comes up.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:46 PM
1

Society, generally, turns a blind eye to female infidelity I honestly find this hilarious. I have seen such the opposite. Which is probably my own confirmation bias talking. But at least I can admit to that. You, apparently, are blinded by your own. I'll repeat: The males that 'dominate reddit' are also in society. Reddit is so gigantic now that the fact that women are ripped apart when it comes to infidelity proves that it also is what happens in society. I'd love to see these people who are co…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:19 PM
2

Reddit is male dominated...but those people are still part of society. Those men still hold those opinions. So to say that society rewards "females" for selfishness but then ignore the tons of comments filled with hatred and malice towards women that cheat...it just makes no sense.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:40 PM
5

Honestly? Have you read the threads where people are claiming their girlfriend/wife cheated? All I see are posts like "what a cunt" and "what a bitch" and "wow, what a selfish cunt bitch." I think this is a case of confirmation bias. You really only notice the ones where people are siding with the woman and seem to ignore the ones where people are calling the woman bad names.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:07 PM
1

Yeah, you're right. Guys never abuse their children, only women do. How dare they show a guy. Honestly, it doesn't matter what sex the person is. The message is clear and has to do with children being abused, not with men being abusers. There is a difference. In this one, they happened to show a guy. There have been others like this where women are the abusers. Not every single thing needs to be taken as a slight against you.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:59 AM
2

If a black or gay person said "I was asked to move from the dressing rooms because a customer was uncomfortable" then I would absolutely say the same exact thing.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:16 PM
1

Lol...what does being a man with a beard have to do with anything? That really is not an issue. The worker was just doing her job. She wasn't complaining, a customer complained. It's her job to remedy the situation. Telling her to 'fuck off' and making a scene is not only immature but it's really unfair to the worker, as it's not even her fault.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:15 PM
1

The comment wasn't about the work ethic, it was about thinking in general. Implying that if you work in retail, you probably aren't very bright.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:45 PM
-6

If you can see into the changing rooms from the waiting area, then I think that's a pretty poor store to expect privacy in. It doesn't really matter what you think, honestly...if it made someone uncomfortable, it made someone uncomfortable. I don't think that there's anything necessarily wrong with that. It all comes down to personal preference and what an individual feels comfortable or uncomfortable with. Do I think it's a bit extreme to complain about something like that? Yes, definitely. How…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:53 PM
1

I'm not really sure I understand what you're trying to say. You say that feminism will only be a movement for gender equality when it's a gender neutral movement but then you admit that men's rights isn't a gender neutral movement. But then you go on to say that because you admit that, it's okay. I'm just confused by the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:03 PM
1

...Really? You don't think that many of these arguments are 'really thin'? Come on.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:53 PM
1

You're fucked... unless you get lucky, lower your standards, pretend to be someone else around woman, or make up for this failing in some other way. This is the same for both men and women, not just men.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:49 PM
2

The same goes for men's rights activists.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:43 PM
0

This was not 'an act of discrimination,' it was a case of probably one woman being uncomfortable and self conscious and so she complained to the staff member. This is not an issue where guys are discriminated against because they're guys. Let me ask you; if a guy complained about a woman being close to the dressing rooms, would that be considered to be discriminatory against women? If the woman refused to leave (as some people on here are suggesting) would you guys jump all over it and say that …
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:39 PM
0

If the customer is always right (which is untrue, but whatever) then the customers who complained would be right also.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:36 PM
-1

Yeah, making a scene is definitely the mature thing to do.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:35 PM
-8

Staff members in clothing stores often don't think much period. This is a ridiculous statement. Seriously.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:33 PM
1

That is what we're going for here, right? :P Some people, yes. Some people on here clearly dislike women in general and don't want to view them as equals.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 01:27 AM
1

Abortion is not always an option for people and the morning after pill isn't 100% effective. And still, knowing that you're pregnant and that something is growing inside of you because of your rape is incredibly psychologically damaging, whether you keep the baby or not. Abortion itself is very psychologically damaging, even if it's a baby you don't want at all. Especially if you were brought up in an environment where abortion = murder, no matter what. To say "there's always abortion" is really…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:03 PM
1

Are you kidding me? I see 'it's not your business' in relationship advice threads about cheating constantly, and it doesn't matter if it's a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:24 PM
-6

...Learned her place? This doesn't sound terribly good.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:21 PM
2

This isn't about women dictating anything. Social norms are social norms for everyone, not just men or just women.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:05 PM
3

The issue isn't all women then, it's specifically women who want to have a gay best friend. That is a certain type of woman.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:00 PM
2

The same could be said for mens rights. Honestly, think about what you're saying and recognize how it could easily be applied to the things everyone on here hates.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:53 PM
2

I've never heard a feminist say that people shouldn't masturbate or have sex (and I'd venture a guess that you haven't either) so your whole theory makes no sense. Porn is a separate issue from sex and masturbation.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:51 PM
2

Lol...how is porn a 'route around' sex? It's watching a video, not actually having sex. This makes no sense.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:50 PM
4

Really, you can't claim that every single woman who is against porn is against it because of jealousy. 'Jealousy' is a common excuse that many people fall back on when they want a reason for why people act or think a certain way but really, it's just lazy. Are some women jealous because of porn? Yes, I'm sure. But to claim that every woman who has ever had a problem with porn has that problem because of jealousy is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:46 PM
1

No one is asking for a dissertation. I'm asking for the proof you claim there is. It should be pretty easy to get, no? Again, you made the claim and so the burden of proof is on you. The conversation is at an end because you refuse to actually provide the proof you claim is 'readily available,' which I find pretty funny.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:17 AM
3

No, see...if you claim that something is proven, the burden of proof is on you. If I ask for a citation for proof you claim is out there, that's on you to show it to me. To say "do some research" is really just side stepping the question. I asked you specifically for the proof you're claiming exists. I am curious about the proof you have 'found.'
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:17 PM
2

If you want to call it that, that's fine. However, that is not how it's 'better known.' Do you understand the difference?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:15 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:15 PM
1

Then that should probably be addressed in this thread, don't you think? I understand this is a thread about "feminists" but someone should be pointing out the fact that it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:25 PM
4

My point is that people on both ends of the spectrum forget that they are just as capable of falling into the traps that they're arguing against. The OP I responded to was referring only to feminism and how that can cause women to see men in general as the enemy. My point is that that can happen just as easily to men on Men's Rights (I've seen it) and people need to be aware on both sides. It's frustrating to see people talking so easily about the other side without recognizing that their side c…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:49 PM
1

I've seen people use this exact phrase (replacing 'men' with 'women') on Men's Rights. If you're going to say that they're doing it to mock the women who say 'what about the men,' don't. One could argue that the women are saying the same thing in a mocking way. So why is it okay for one gender to use but not the other?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:43 PM
3

Feminism can become an ideology of hate once it echos around in someone's head for long enough. Men in general can become the enemy in their minds Explain to me how the exact same thing doesn't happen when it comes to men's rights? I've seen many guys who clearly have gigantic issues with women, not just with the fact that they 'don't have rights.'
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:39 PM
2

If anyone sounds like a troll, it's you. To say that feminism is always evil is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:25 PM
1

I would say from watching my mother that it is the women who cannot let go and let their husbands help them. You really need to look up the definition of 'anecdotal evidence.'
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:17 PM
3

Except that men's rights issues have been proven to actually exist, What proof are you referring to?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:15 PM
1

Circumcision is not 'better known' is 'male genital mutilation.' You wanting people to call it that does not mean that's how it's 'better known.'
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:07 PM
0

If a woman was leaving her children then yeah, people would absolutely care.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:34 PM
4

When you leave the woman with two children to wrangle up by herself then it makes it pretty fucking difficult to get out. She didn't abandon the kids like the guy did. It's easier to get out when you're thinking of no one but yourself.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:32 PM
0

Haha..you're kidding yourself if you think that a woman leaving her children behind wouldn't make people just as disgusted. I'd venture that they'd be even more disgusted because of the way society views mothers and motherhood. Your bias is showing.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:29 PM
1

You're right, he's totally justified in taking a child off of his lap to run away and then getting into his car so that his girlfriend and kids had no way of getting away quickly. Please. Being in a shitty situation doesn't absolve you of your crimes. You can't fall back on 'he was a victim so he should remain blameless for anything and everything that he did in the situation.'
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:22 PM
3

You're right. You don't know those things so your best bet is to leave your children and girlfriend there to deal with it while you sit far away somewhere.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:20 PM
4

If you're going to 'fix that for him' then you should change it to 'person.' But really, black men have it the worst in terms of prejudice. There's no 'fixing' the statement needed from you.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:41 PM
9

No, hypothetical situations have their place here, as well as anywhere else. You're missing my point. It doesn't matter if it's a man or a woman. Either you think it's okay that a battered spouse is acquitted of murder charges, or you don't. It shouldn't matter if it's a man or a woman. And if you'd celebrate a man being acquitted for the same exact reason, perhaps you should examine that and your bias. That's all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:59 PM
3

...That isn't an actual response. At least not one that makes any sense. Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:16 PM
11

So...if this was a battered man acquitted for the murder of his wife, would you be celebrating it? I think it's important that you ask yourself that question, and then ask why it's a bad thing when it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:47 PM
1

Oh, jesus. People really will be ~offended~ by anything, won't they?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:43 PM
3

But the same goes for men. That's more of a 'human' thing than a gender thing.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:39 PM
4

Don't trust any woman's snake tongue. Always wear a condom if you don't have a vasectomy. How ridiculous this is. Just because some women are liars doesn't mean they all are. If a woman said that all men were liars, guys on /r/MensRights would be all over that, and how much of a sexist, broad generalization it is. Not all women lie. Not all women try to 'trap' guys. Just because you think some woman did it to you is no reason to give such sexist advice.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 05:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter