TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Competitive_Swan_130 Archive

View 0 posts and 184 comments by Competitive_Swan_130 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

I wouldn't say it's a lot of women but you are correct that certain women reject and are outright nasty to any group they feel may be competition with them in general. The same women who feel this way about bi men and trans women fel the same way about other women and usually don't have women as friends
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:28 AM

What? but also think the guy who isn’t achieved under this same system is less of a man than a accomplished high status one. WTF does that even mean? And any progressive woman with a brain is not expecting straight male voters to vote progressive en masse since that hasn't happened since the 1960s. Once programs and [references started be open to other groups of people and not just for them it's been a big woe is me pity fest Even though the policies would benefit them too. It's silly and stupid…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:24 AM
1

Eh. I already have a best friend and wouldn't expect my fiance to take her place because that seems unfair. Expecting a partner to fulfill every emotional and social need inevitably breeds resentment when they inevitably fail to satisfy roles they were never meant to play in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:37 PM
1

Amatonormativity is strong in America. My dating and romantic life has, for the most part, been exceptional though and I really believe that's because I was raised to not prioritize romantic relationships over other types of relationships and to enjoy my own company so I'm not desperate to be in a relationship as soon as one just ended. These lessons have served me well
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:32 PM
16

Oh, so you leech. The point still stands, most men do work and do sell their body so your claim is still wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 10:41 AM
18

Do you work for a living? Then you sell your body/ Unless you are independently wealthy and don't have to work, you sell your body for a price to get money . Also I don't know how an act suddenly becomes more ethical because you do it for free., Also many men have sex for money, they just have sex with other men usually because that's where the market is
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 10:33 AM
0

We don't hate men. We hate people who make up shit. So we hate you probaby
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:59 PM
15

Most women don't care enough to demonize it but that doesn't mean we wont laugh at you. And trying to rebrand "I can't get a date at home" into a strategic macroeconomic move is even more hilarious but the defense is as flimsy as your game. Notice how passport bro flight itineraries always map to developing nations rather than countries with a comparable or higher GDP, proving it's less about finding a soulmate and more about the fact that you can't find women who want you so you gotta look for …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:58 PM

LMAO, what? Where are the women saying this?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 10:33 AM

Also, the only women on this list who knew their spouse was a psycho were psychos themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 10:30 AM

Men dislike weak and shy girls more than violent psychopaths and I'll die on that hill Lets look at some of the most famous female killers and see what they all had in common: Nannie Doss: Had a husband at the time when she committed her crimes. Karla Homolka: had a husband at the time when she committed her crimes. Katherine Knight: Had a boyfriend at the time when she committed her crimes. Rosemary West: Had a husband. Stacey Castor: Had a husband Jodi Arias: Had a boyfriend Also, there is an …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 10:27 AM
-1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 10:17 AM
17

the fact that your point will be lost on 90% of the people who respond here is sad
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:49 PM
17

LMAOOO
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 09:48 PM
90

look <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 08:47 PM
2

No you know what I take that back. Because I know a dude who works at a Popeyes who is able to play the field without being dishonest. So being broke isn't even an excuse for lying. Men need to go back and listen to more Patrice Onea; if yall think lying is the move.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 05:40 AM
2

It's cheaper if you are talking money only. But for men with even a little bit of money, their time is very valuable and irreplaceable. Hell even if you're broke your time should be too valuable to spend trying to lie just to have sex. MOst men can go get more money, but lost time is gone forever. But yes, I guess if you are an absolute bum who has disposable time, then I guess lying is the way to go
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 05:28 AM
9

Lying is obviously worse lol. One adult paying another adult for sex is an honest transaction, where one party is giving the other what they asked for. Not only is lying wrong because it harms the woman lied to but also because it harms the man doing the lying. The amount of time it takes you to lie your way into a woman's life is time he will never get back and all for what? To have sex? You're better of masturbating or just paying for it if you can't find a steady partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 02:45 AM
1

Most anti porn arguments are deeply rooted in stupidity, retrograde religious beliefs and ignorance but criticizing men who watch pornography is not misandristic because it targets a specific behavioral choice rather than a man's inherent gender or identity. Watching porn is not an inherent trait of men last time I checked. Again, I think women who shame private behaviors, especially for men they aren't even dating, are the definition of birds. Not misandrists though
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 11:08 AM
0

This dumb ass myth again...Many women who are lonely are in relationships. Men, or anybody for that matter, who believe a relationship is the cure to loneliness are the worst. You probably lovebomb women and that's why they avoid you.. Get hobbies, get friends, get a life. No woman wants to have the responsibility of solving your loneliness issues. As an adult, if you can't be single without being lonely you have deeper issues that no woman will ever knowingly involve herself in.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:19 AM

Oh so you agree that what you said means nothing and accomplishes nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:14 PM

Why don't you try dating beyond who you are attracted to then? Have you tried dating men? Sounds like your chips are down and you need to wake up and smell the Grindr
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:32 PM

It's fascinating how you think we're holding out for some mythical peak when the actual reality is that most women are already out here dating perfectly average men who have good intentions. My fiance is far from perfect and any woman with a significant other , if she's honest, will say the same. The real issue is that far too many men are profoundly below average and have zero interest in fixing that, yet they still expect to be treated like a prize. You are also missing the point that loneline…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:30 PM
0

I agree. Not only are they not desired but they also aren't really nice or good people. If the only time you're good or do things for somebody is when you expect something back, you're just transactional. Which is cool, I see nothing wrong with women getting money out of men , especially when a lot of women are having sex with men and not getting anything out of the sex. Women who hook up and don't have an orgasm or any money in their hand are engaging in frivilous fucking and that shit is stupi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:39 PM
2

No and that's not what that study says. Putting aside the fact that that it's crazy to believe a sample size of 61 can sstatistically represent billions of people. The study sufffers from selection bias because the women surveyed were all identified as regular porn viewers. Most women don't fall into that category. And even then, say the number of women who regularly watch porn is in the 10s of millions, 61 women still can't represent a number that large. Also I don't believe the study was even …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:10 PM
4

I don't shame men for watching porn and I think women who do are silly, especially when they try to stop a man they are already dating from watching porn. Trying to control another adult is the dumbest shit ever Also, it depends on the type of porn being watched as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:00 PM

Are you being dense or trolling? Because you're trying to separate having unprotected sex from the risk of pregnancy as if those two things aren't related.. The two are directly linked. It's completely irrational to say it makes sense to have unprotected sex with someone you don't trust to be exclusive. "People take risks with people they trust all the time?" WTF? You may trust her to be something that is irrelevant to this topic but you don't trust this person to be exclusive. Requesting a DNA …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:32 PM

I just find it amusing that some men are having unprotected sex with women they don't trust. That means you don't even care abut your own life, so you definitely shouldn't be raising kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 09:33 AM

ding diing ding! This should be the number 1 comment
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 09:32 AM

It's amazing how many men claim they have trust issues with women they have no problem having unprotetced sex with. Make it make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:47 AM

"I have trust issues but I will fuck you raw" is interesting to say the least
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:45 AM
1

Consumerism is not feminism. Corporate marketing that uses empowerment slogans to sell products is just standard capitalism maximizing profit. Real feminism focuses on structural power, legal rights, and economic autonomy.Feminists have been calling this out forever and there are words for - femvertising and purplewashing. It's not feminism and the leaders of the movement have never enrdorseed it. The manosphere is VERY different because it's leaders explicitly often endorse red pill BS. The red…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:41 AM
9

Some men want to feel needed more than wanted. They want to be with a woman who feels impressed by their ability to buy dinner at Pappadeaux lol If she's impressed by that, she usually is green af and easier to handle
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:55 PM
3

Most of the loudest mouths in the manosphere don't even live the lives they claim. From the cornballs Fresh and Fit, to exposed closeted homosexuals like Kevin Samuels and Jesse Lee Peterson.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:53 PM
11

Those men want faithful women but they themselves don't believe they should have to be faithful as well. Granted, most of them aren't "Experts" in any sense and often don't even have a community college level education so nobody should take them seriously or representative of men as a whole
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:51 PM
1

I don't find it disgusting at all. I actually think it's great that a man asks a woman what she wants and gives it to her. I think men who have sex with women and leave them with nothing, not even an orgasm are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:52 PM
10

Not sure what that has to do with feminism? Especially since feminist scholars have been arguing against forced circumcision , for a long damn time, actual mainstream feminists scholars. Again though, women and feminists aren't running any countries. Men run the legislatures and the executive branches and somehow it's our problem. Even on issues we don't even support
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:06 PM
2

Let's say it is murder. Then you are murdering every dying person you refuse to donate an organ to by the same logic. and wtf is no limit abortions lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 06:56 PM
9

She made it very clear at the beginning that she was making a point. I hope you are trollin and not special ed as you seem
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 06:54 PM
10

They don't understand it and it's obvious. The fact that OP is so upset about what the youtuber is saying in the video proves her whole point about the way we talk about women's rights. Yes, what she proposes is extreme, now imagine if it was reality because it is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:07 PM
12

What you call the "twisted reasoning " that she spends the first fourteen minutes laying out is literally ACTUAL English Common Law and standard crime statistics. She took the exact legal logic used to restrict women for centuries and flipped the target to men. If you find that structural logic inherently evil and terrifying when it's pointed at you, congratulations. You just accidentally agreed with the entire point of the video
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:59 PM
12

No. Do you know what satire is? It's not parody or just humor or a joke. It's a critique of an ACTUAL real target, that's what makes satire. Every single crazy policy in that video is a direct, flipped copy of real legal or social restrictions women have actually dealt with, from coverture to modern reproductive bans. Your dumb ass analogy bombs because it mirrors absolutely nothing. There is no dominant societal institution trying to legally mandate male pregnancy by age thirty to save the stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:48 PM
10

It's not even her being extreme, OP can't recognize obvious satire and rhetorical mirroring. The actual video is taking a common claim the manosphere uses against women and using it against men to make a point. OP should finish 5th grade reasoning before he tries to make another point
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:08 PM
19

Are you neurodivergent? I ask because if you can't recognize obvious satire and rhetorical mirroring like whats in that video then you should go get tested
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:01 PM
4

Using the vocabulary of a sociology major to explain why you are too scared to say 'not cool, bro' to a coworker is a bit much
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 08:52 AM
7

An incredible amount of effort spent designing a sci-fi utopia where you still don't have a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 08:48 AM
11

Ah, yes, comparing a human rights movement to literal Nazis because a British politician made a satirical joke about a curfew. Peak Reddit.If women have to "own the roster" of feminism because of Valerie Solanas (ONE individual diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia btw) then by that exact same logic, men own the roster of every serial killer, dictator, and war criminal in human history. As for the M&M analogy, women aren't playing a logic game; they're playing the odds. UNODC data consistently s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:22 PM
5

The point still stands, though, that it's a choice determined by other people's reaction to it. Honestly, I find men not living their truth to be whats unattractive. Most women know that straight men can be attracted to trans women and accept that as a factual but not normative judgemnt. Even the cis women who really dislike trans women and call any man attracted to them gay know deep down that they aren't. I have never met a gay man who is attracted to trans women, because trans women look like…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:44 PM
3

He thinks most women are climaxing through hard, deep penetrative sex because he watches pornos and thinks those women are really having orgasms
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:03 AM
2

Great point!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:02 AM
2

If the problem were female effort, the orgasm gap wouldn't be consistent across partners, cultures, countries and most importantly:decades of research. It would vary. It does not. The idea that men do 80-90% of the work requires defining sex as whatever produces male orgasm, which is precisely the problem women are talking about when we complain about the orgasm gap. Penetrative sex, which is what you call doing the work, produces orgasm in about 18% of women. The clitoris is the main orgasmic a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:00 AM
-1

But they don't ask for money up front from every man they have sex with. Sex workers have sex for pleasure as well. They may not offer that to you, but it does happen
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:45 PM
7

Hell, if it guaranteed we'd have an orgasm most of the time it would be amazing. That's all some of us would want. And people wonder why sex workers ask for something up front. Yeah, no shit because most women aren't getting a damn thing out of sex. You are walking away with no orgasm, no decent man, no money...it's like you're paying him for sex actually
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:34 PM
7

Because nobody is trying to get inundated with a barrage of low-effort messages from men who are on an app because they can't interact with people IRL. Also, most of the apps don't screen their users well enough. And men lie about shit on their profile that is just crazy. And the lies are so bad; don't tell me you are apolitical or moderate... all women know what that really means. Have the cajones to say what you are. I wouldn't fuck with you, but I'm sure theres some bumpkin in a long jean dre…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:03 AM

Equating a flood of low effort attention with actual romantic access is a massive leap in logic. Typical of this sub though. Having a full inbox of unsolicited, objectifying messages is not getting into the game. Imagine if the population of trans women was double or triple that of cis women. And imagine a world where dating apps didn't allow trans nor cis women to identify themselves as such. Now imagine you aren't into trans women, but you also can't really figure out if a woman is trans or ci…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:11 PM
11

Why would I ask random non-experts who aren't considered leaders nor influential members of a particular group, who could possibly be posing, who may call themselves feminists and not really be one any serious question? If I based my opinion of men on what I see people who identify as men post on this sub, I would honestly be advocating for a Gynarchy: government because there is no way I could think men were smart enough to run anything important. But I understand reddit is not real life and pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:52 AM

K. Don't use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 05:56 AM

Thank you for moving the goalposts. The original claim was that this type of character could never exist as a male. That got debunked. Now suddenly the argument isn't about existence anymore. I'm still game though; just start picking up the goalposts to be moved again, or better yet, just hold onto them like Sisyphus did with the boulder because you'll gonna have to move it again. You say it's different because "Quagmire is portrayed as disgusting." Quagmire is one of the most beloved characters…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 05:21 AM

Duh. Try reading with your brain next time. A paragraph generally indicates the author is moving on to another point. Since I debunked his point in the first one, I was moving on to another point in my second paragraph. See that space? it was to let people know this was a different paragraph and point. It's called EXTENDING THE ARGUMENT. Look it up and think about it with your brain and not with your reflexes sometime. There are resources for level 1 English reading available; do you need sugges…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:23 AM

Be serious. Coach Carr from Mean Girls, Quagmire has several episodes with him thirsting after young girls, Mr Garrison does this all the time, played for laughs This post is sillier than the sketch. Mr Koening in the exact same sketch is inappropriate with kids; its part of the gag Even if it were true, the fact that THIS is the type of right (the right to be a pervy male teacher for laughs) you are concerned with when women are talking about bodily autonomy should tell you something about your…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:59 AM
2

Again, can you give evidence for this claim that most feminist women start at that idea? I don't want your anecdotes; I want real evidence. If you can't, then why keep believing it? IT's almost silly how much people like you cling to ideas in the face of evidence. You make claims about a movement, but instead of looking at the leaders and prominent activists for that movement, you would rather look to this idea of what a feminist is. Sir, I say this with serious concern: please take a class in i…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:30 AM
20

This is false bullshit that gets posted by men here damn near every day and gets debunked every day. You want women to pay attention; hell, y'all don't even pay attention to each other. If you did, you'd recognize the men who looked stupid yesterday for postng this lie. As I said yesterday: "The premise is historically false and so stupid, I can't even really talk about it without sounding ableist. What I will do is show you how feminists have been addressing 'men's issues' for decades. We have …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:14 PM
-3

I'll take it a step further. People can and will give advice all day about things. But most should be ignored if you want real results and not anecdotes. The fact is people shouldn't give dating advice unless they have the credentials of a therapist, psychologist, or relationship counselor who studies human behavior at scale, faces professional accountability, and the could face consequences for causing harm and lose their license if they cause harm. A person who has dated isnt qualified to advi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:40 PM
18

There are plenty of women out there who LOVE to hear men say, "You're not like other girls" and plenty of men who love to hear it when women say "Most men are trash, but you aren't." It's not a gendered thing. It's a cornball thing, and only a green, lame-ass person would think it's a compliment. Whatever their gender. I take it as a HUGE red flag when a man describes himself that way. Most men I know who believe they "aren't like other guys" have no male friends, usually lovebomb, trauma dump, …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:58 PM
7

Nobody said it was lol. She's using an analogy to make a point about how women usually feel. It's hillarious how even then some of you still can't think about women, it's still all about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 01:49 PM
13

"The dating collapse happened two generations after female economic freedom, therefore economics is irrelevant." Sorry but that's not how causation works and you should know it. Social systems built over centuries do not reorganize the moment a law changes. Did discrimination cease to exist Did racism end the day the 14th Amendment passed? A generational lag is exactly what you would predict if economics was the driver, not evidence against it. "women haven't needed men in at least 50 years." Pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:01 AM
3

Which isn't a feminist view; it's pedestalization. Feminism advocates for women being seen as equal, complex human beings, not perfect ones. Christopher Hitchens was a feminist and he was extremely critical of several women and for good reasons. Glenn Greenwald is also, and he's still a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 09:53 AM
30

Honest answer from someone who has been on both sides of this statistics gap and is now happily on the right side of it. Going into a first time with somebody new, my realistic expectations were it'll probably be ok or mid, it will probably not be good, and there is maybe a 50% chance it will be actively disappointing or bad. That's not just my experience; the orgasm gap is real and large. Studies consistently show women orgasm with a familiar partner approximately 65% of the time versus men at …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:44 AM
3

The invisible man theory would be more persuasive if women's loneliness statistics did not exist. But the stats do exist. Women report loneliness, romantic dissatisfaction, and inability to find partners at rates that match or exceed men depending on the demographic and the study. The whole 'women choose from a sea of suitors while men are invisible' narrative is built almost entirely on dating app data, where the top 20% of men get the majority of female attention. What the narrative leaves out…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:30 AM
0

This worldview has an issue you haven't resolved though: If a significant number of wealthy women exclusively pursue wealthier men, and female educational and economic attainment has now surpassed male attainment at nearly every level, the prediction is a marriage market in total collapse with wealthy women universally single. That is not what the data shows. College educated women marry at higher rates than non college educated women, not lower. High earning women are more likely to be married …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:23 AM
0

Thank you and hard agree! The tragedy is a lot of people were never taught to reason at all. A single semester of basic logic, informal fallacies, heuristics, and argument structure would do more measurable good than people think. Philosophy gets dismissed as impractical precisely by the people who would benefit from it most. Its the most practical subject available. It teaches you how to think, which is the operating system everything else runs on. Broken operating system, broken outputs, regar…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:14 AM
38

Women gaining economic independence changed the terms of relationships. Thats what happens when you remove coercion (when your only alternative to marriage was destitution, that was not a free choice) from an arrangement and let both parties actually choose. "Western men are uniquely terrified of dying alone." The fastest growing loneliness demographic in the developed world is middle aged and elderly women. Loneliness isn't a male affliction, it's a human one, and you have dressed it up in a ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:18 PM

Yes. If Chirayu Rana was sexually harassed by a female executive, he should be believed, supported, and taken seriously. Full stop. Male victims of sexual harassment and abuse are systematically underserved, underbelieved, and underreported that's a documented problemAny feminism worth the name applies its principles regardless of the victim's gender. So on the core claim a male accuser deserves the same baseline of credibility as a female accuser...yeah no shit Now let's go through the rest, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 06:52 AM
3

Usually, when I hear something like that, the guy doesn't know there's another woman in earshot, so I don't assume he's clueless. I assume he's objectifying a woman and needs to do better but won't unless somebody shows him why that's wrong. In most cases, that's above my paygrade. However, I have several brothers and male relatives and I do not let them slide. I don't do it in a fonger wagging, hey you're evil kind of way, because I don't think they are bad humans but they are, like many humans…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:30 PM
2

Those women are stupid and don't know what objectification is. Just because stupid women use the word wrong doesn't mean they need to be listened to. People use a lot of words wrong. That's basically what pop psychology is
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:20 PM
2

No its not as long as the stranger intends to or desires to engage with the person as a Human and not an Object. Why is this hard to understand????
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:17 PM
3

No. The difference is does the man see her as a human or an object. Its very simple. A man can appear attractive and the moment he starts speaking about me or other women in an objectifying way they become unattractive af. You'd be surprised how many men have talked themselves out of a hook up or a second date. Objectifying: "Look at the body on that chick" The woman is reduced entirely to her physical form. There is no person attached to it in the speaker's framing, just a collection of parts b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 04:23 PM
5

Objectification is the act of treating a person as an object, tool, or commodity rather than a human being with autonomy and feelings. No woman wants that, even from 'attractive' or high-value men...whatever the hell that is. In fact, a man can go from attractive to unattractive the minute I hear him using objectifying language.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:11 PM
37

Yes we want to be desired, chased, touched, admired, complimented, and sexually wanted. These are all different than objectification.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:06 PM

Your examples aren't the same thing and you know it. When a woman says she won't date someone who cheated on her she's responding to a behavior someone did TO her. When you say you screen women by body count you're responding to consensual experiences she had before she ever met you. One of these involves you. One doesn't. That's not a double standard that's just a different situation. And your body count risk assessment argument falls apart the second you actually push on it because you never s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:08 AM
1

syas more about you and your circle (f you have one) than naything. People talk about sex all the time. The top songs on the clean radio station are explicitly about sex. Euphoria, Masters of Sex Sexify, sex is consistently a popular topic on social media. lol,people and women you know want to and enjoy talking about sex, they just don't want to talk about that shit with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 03:56 AM
13

This argument starts with a real idea media can influence expectations then runs way past what the evidence actually says. Most of those studies are about correlation not causation so people who already like intense romantic fantasy are more likely to watch that content not suddenly brainwashed by it. It also assumes women are just passively soaking this in and then demanding a billionaire soulmate which is a pretty cartoonish view of how people interact with fiction. By that logic anyone who wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 12:43 AM
4

This waitress logic theory is just a pseudo-intellectual attempt to label women as a collective hive mind that can't process logic. It isn't a sociological discovery; it's a bad faith argument used to dismiss women's lived experiences as a brain glitch. You're effectively claiming an entire gender is biologically incapable of consistency just because they don't agree with your personal worldview. The so called contradictions you listed aren't contradictory or hypocritical. Data from the Bureau o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 03:15 AM
2

No, because what you are saying is silly. The only way to stop what you see as a problem would be to take away a woman's bodily autonomy by forcing them to terminate pregnancy depending on the whims of a man. And no, men should not be able to avoid child support for these children they didn't agree to because the responsibility then falls on the tax payer and that's extremely unfair. If you think its unfair and a loss of bodily autonomy for a man to have to pay for a baby that's his because he d…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:33 PM
20

This sub is gold for people who love laughing at red pillers making fools of themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:15 AM
12

Once a child is born both parents have the exact same legal duty to provide support so the only difference is that men never have their bodily autonomy threatened to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:13 AM
10

Mens bodies can't choose to have children either. Unless you mean trans men. So that point is moot. The selective service conundrum is one created by men and maintained by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:09 AM

Well you're putting words into my mouth never said that what I am saying is if you're going to talk about looks there's some important context it needs to be evaluated anytime somebody makes a claim people always evaluate the source of their claim and if looks are gonna be the topic then yours should be open to discussion as well
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:14 AM

Absolutely if you're going to come on here talking about another person's looks as if that person is beneath you or undateable to evaluate your opinion we also need to see how you look as well back it's it's like when you see it some people talking about they don't deal with broke energy or broke boys but they're broke themselves that's some important context
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:13 AM

I feel like this is a great idea but should be only available to users who post a clear picture of themselves so that we don't get a situation where a bunch of acne-prone incels are sitting behind computer screens talking about women they never could get in the first place .like how some subs have posts that are only available to certain approved users, this is how the rule should be applied
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:56 AM
9

LOL, what? Thats what fuckboys do. If they only dealt with women who want sex on the first date they wouldn't be called fuckboys. Nobody would be angry because both parties got what they want. Fuckboys are manipulative to get what they want. You don't have to be manipulative if the woman wants the same thing you do. Fuckboys love women who are celibate because its a conquest
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:33 PM
7

Celibacy has to be a thing you do for you. If men ghosting you over it bothers you then there's a problem. And also, just because a woman has sex with a man doesn't make her a "hoe". Lets leave that retrograde ass thinking in 1960 please. Men who prioritize sex are going to want women who are open to that. There's nothing wrong with the woman or the man in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:29 PM

Stop trying to pretend women do this to the same degree men do because we don't. Notice not one woman in this thread has mentioned Toby MaGuire's looks
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:24 PM

If this were really about fertility, men would be just as concerned about their own age lowering sperm quality and increasing genetic risks, and about health, stress, and long term stability, instead of acting like the only variable that matters is how close someone is to the legal minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 09:43 AM

No, because whoever I name I'm sure you'll dispute.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 09:38 AM

Seething? No one is seething, they are just gossiping which is what they do in celebrity forums. Of course they will gossip about this: When a man in Hollywood can date a woman his own age who looks 20 but chooses an actual 20 year old instead, people are allowed to wonder if it is less about connection and more about inexperience, and that is what makes it weird to somebody. The people with opinions arent breaking any laws either and yet here you are "angry" and seething by your own admission.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 07:20 AM
5

Since you won't link to specific studies, I'm just going to guess which ones you're talking about. The “wage gap disappears” line just isn’t accurate. Major analyses from places like the Pew Research Center and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics already control for hours worked, job type, education, and experience. And even after those adjustments, there’s still a gap, usually around 10 percent. That’s not stay at home moms being compared to guys pulling 60 hour weeks. What’s left reflects thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 11:22 AM
1

You did not link to any specific studies, you talk in general about statistics but until you link to the actual studies you talk about how do you expect people to discuss them? SMH another illogical man
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 11:15 AM

I agree. Thats why women tell men to get hobbies and do things they actually enjoy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 06:34 AM
-1

If you are going to make claims like this you need to at least have several examples as proof. Seems like you are trying to confirm a narrative because you surely didnt look for evidence or you would have included these studies as proof
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 06:30 AM
4

What we are saying when we say thing like this is: STOP MAKING DATING/ WOMEN the main focus in your life. Do things because you enjoy them and you are more likely to run into the woman you should be with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:46 AM
1

Ok. And it's men who created and maintain this law. This is a man problem and continues to be. Has nothing to do with feminists m. The Trump admin just proposed taking women out of combat all together. So yall need to do something about the problem yall have created and stop talking to women about it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:42 AM
-1

Calling Reddit left wing confuses user demographics with institutional bias that matters. REDDIT, INC is a publicly traded, ad driven capitalist corporation whose incentive is increasing shareholder value not advancing progressive doctrine. Just because there may be more left leaning users does not mean there is left wing control of anything so the bias doesn't matter. If there was there wouldnt be a r/conservative in the first place. Reddits largest shgareholder is a media conglomerate not some…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:24 AM
13

People push back against flat earthers, people push back against psychic scammers, people push back against crypto scams and all of those things are based on lies. SMH invest in an introduction to logic course so you don't say shit like this again
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 05:12 AM
3

What? How isany of that being censored? You can say whatever the hell you want but people are allowed to respond as well. Also, people react negatively to flat earthers and push back against them, that doesn't mean we live on a flat earth. Just because people push back against bullshit doesn't make it true. Jeez. the men here lack basic logic
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 01:59 AM
8

You are arguing with women now in the comments. The question you should be asking is, asking your doctor if Abilify is right for you because there are some issues going on if you made this post unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:17 PM
17

In other words, don't argue with him. lmao I keep telling women to peruse this sub for unintentional comedy and the men here always deliver
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:16 PM
-1

"my two female friends" smh lmao First of all if you are handing over your dating life to two women like that it just proves its hard for two women to pretend to be the type of man you want to be. If they were really your friends they would have given you better advice than what they did which was crazy becasue i bet neither one of them would want to date a man who they knew had his dating persona created by two women because his real personality wasn't cutting it. Second, go wherever you want, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:30 AM

Thank you Captain Obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 11:33 AM
0

I think people who say this don't travel much. And I know traveling can be expensive so if you don't travel much, I'm not knocking you but if you ever get the chance to visit other countries (not as a sex tourist, but as a backpacker) you may change your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 04:59 PM
19

These clowns think anecdotal evidence is the gold standard. Post after post its the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:24 AM

How do you know women are the ones behind this? Men edit other mens pictures. Andrew Tate fans are always giving their King a hairline he has never had and several have tatoos of his face on their bodies that have been beautified. men are just as capable of doing beauty edits on other men, and its usuallu red pill men look at this attoo where they make Tate look more handsome than he is <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:23 PM
19

This is true. Most people prefer fantasy to reality . It takes serious work and dedication to really appreciate honesty. I used to love lies until I started following Blanton's Radical Honesty
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 02:54 PM
10

What you're noticing is a lot of the hot guys turning average the more they age. I don't know many women who have ever decided to have sex with somebody solely on looks at any point in their lives. What a lot of men don't understand is, You can be hot as hell, very tall, dressed nice and say one thing wrong or do one thing wrong and turn ugly. You'd be shocked at how many men have talked their way out of sex or how many times I thought a guy was handsome until I learned he was MAGA.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:17 AM
12

Abortion is about bodily autonomy. Legal parenthood is about obligations to an existing person. Those aren’t the same moral domain. A woman can opt out of pregnancy because no one gets a right to use her body. No one gets to opt out of supporting a child once that child exists, because the child isn’t using your body. It’s just existing. Adoption doesn’t erase responsibility by fiat. It requires another willing caretaker and state approval. Men already have the same option women do there. You ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:34 PM
2

Pointing out that some men were disenfranchised by class doesn't add much to the discussion, iit just shows that poor men were excluded conditionally, while women were excluded universally by sex, across classes, states, and eras.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:56 PM
4

Saying men didn’t ‘give’ rights because they just ‘stopped taking them’ is like saying a mugger deserves credit for returning your wallet. When red pill men in other subreddits talk about superior male reasoning, I always link them to this subreddit and now I have another great post to show them, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:52 PM
2

Women leaders in history A few exceptional women ruling in male dominated systems does not disprove patriarchy any more than a few poor kings would disprove monarchy. Tokens aint trends. Cleopatra didn’t abolish male power, she survived inside it. 19th Amendment Men didn't wake up one morning and generously hand women the vote out of kindness. Women organized for decades and men in power conceded under pressure, war logistics, and political math. Rights gained after a fight are not proof oppress…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:45 PM
4

First off, as an aside, if bad arguments and bad science undermined social movements there woudl be no red pill movement at all,. hat you’re actually describing here isn’t settled science being exposed as flimsy, it’s the very normal process of popular claims being simplified, misquoted, and then corrected. In the first example, the Paul Dolan happiness claim was overstated, and Dolan publicly acknowledged that he misinterpreted the spouse absent coding in the survey. That part is not controvers…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:28 AM
1

But those women don't want to be single. I'm not single now but when I was I had amazing times and did things I wouldn't have been able to do if I had to consider somebody else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:18 AM
0

Also being indirect with answers is more unattractive then bring direct about the fact that you are short or broke. It gives weak
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:15 AM
1

I think both men and women lie to themselves when they deny that all relationships other than familial (and even these are up for debate) are transactional
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:13 AM
1

sounds anecdotal...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:21 AM
1

I agree. Nobody worth a damn would knowingly date a scammer or a user. I am not speaking of people who get scammed themselves, I'm speaking of people who date known scammers and feel as if its ok because they havent been scammed yet
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:20 AM
2

Men who can’t guarantee an orgasm for a woman shouldn't criticize men who pay for sex since at least the latter make sure the woman got something out of it. If you’re having sex with a woman for free and she also isn’t getting off, you’re awful in the worst way
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:04 AM
0

I don’t know why prostitution feels icky to so many men when many of them are A OK with women not having an orgasm during sex. It’s kind of selfish because you don’t want her to have money from the sex and you don’t care if she has orgasms really. So you just want want her to be doing some frivolous fucking for your benefit
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:01 AM
4

I'm curious, why would the fact that you are choosingto be sexless by not paying make you want to talk about it more and to whom would this information be relevant? honest q
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:26 PM
4

I didn't say it should be like that, I'm saying it usually is. Most women, especially those in sex work, who you start off being a trick with are always going to see you as a trick. There's nothing wrong with being a trick IMO but I know many men would not like being defined by that role.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:23 PM
15

Just remember if you pay once, that is all you will likely be to that woman from then on. I'm not against men who pay or sex work, but men who act like it solves a probem for them are in for a surprise. Also, stop watching Myron, he just got his first girlfriend last year and already lost her to a roller blader, they also never had sex. He is not who he pretends to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:22 PM
-1

What feminist is saying women are better at EVERYTHING? As to your second point, how does a tennis match disprove that women don't need men? I don't NEED a man, I have one because I WANT him though but I don't need him and can function without him. Also, how male professional athletes perform says nothing about every other man and just because he can beat Serena doesn't mean YOU could. Serena and most of the women who play professional tennis would kick your ass in a match
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 05:58 PM
5

I agree, when a person says Roberto Duran is the greatest lightweight boxer they don't follow it up with but most heavyweight boxers would beat his ass. That would sound petty and silly to point out
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 05:56 PM

lol. lmao even.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:09 PM
1

I can't tell. This still happens to me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:06 PM
0

Sounds like an anecdote. I thought men were the logical, rational gender and this sub proves thats a lie every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 07:19 AM
29

Interesting theory, but it misses the bigger picture: most humans follow social norms, men included. Men face pressures too how they dress, work, whine on this subreddit, perform in relationships, maintain fitness, show confidence even when insecure. Women might navigate appearance and social expectations differently, but everyone is constantly performing norms; it’s just that men’s conformity often goes unnoticed or is rewarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 04:46 PM

Thats because when they arent directly talking to a minority they are talking to straight white men They are the default.... Its amazing these men feel left out when they control leadership positions in both parties, make up the majority of staff for both political parties, lead most of the advocacy groups on both sides...I guess like they say when you're used to privilege equality feels like oppression or exclusion I don't get it. And I have tried to but I can't. My sorority is a historically b…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 07:44 AM

The men in this sub are responsible for more whine than Italy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:27 PM

Lmao who is asking to be protected by you? No woman is dumb enougg to put her safety in the hands of the type of man who posts on reddit. Lmao might as well ask another woman to protect us
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:38 PM

No sane woman is expecting men like you to protect or provide anything because we know you cant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:36 PM
7

Imagine comparing the relatively recent data about same sex marriages to the well establiahed data on heterosexual marriages to make conclusions. I need you to take a statistics class
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:20 PM
4

You sound insane. You need to decenter romantic relationships from your life because right now , if you believe what you typed here, you would make a terrible mate. The kind who doesn't take a it well when it gets cut off eventually because you are smothering the other person, Yuck, I feel for whoever ends up with you if it ever happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 05:23 AM
1

Yeah that's why Joe Rogan is known for being more of a heartthrob than Prince
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 03:03 AM
-1

Men here come so close to blaming the real culprit (toxic masculinity) but always manage to somehow make a left turn into blaming women or trying to belittle women's issues. Its like parody at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:43 AM
0

Many men here obviously have never taken a basic logic or critical thinking class. It's the only explanation for the posts that go "Why do all women do this thing I noticed a small group of women doing online once" Its middle school tier shit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:40 AM
0

Of course. I've also seen a group of circus animals ride unicycles before. Doesn't mean It would be right for me to use that to come to any conclusion about animals in general. Also nice moving of the goal post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:38 AM
1

Show me proof of a sizeable number of women being revolted about some other woman's choice in mate. I know a lot of women will be revolted when we see women dating somebody like a Chris Brown in 2025, but that's because of his history.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:34 AM

There are some people who did bad thing when they didnt have to and there are others who did "bad things" when pushed into a corner or in response to aggression from others. The two groups need to be separated completely. There's a huge difference between Thomas Jefferson's misdeeds and say Nat Turner. Turner probably wouldn't have killed anybody if he wasn't in his position he was forced into. Jefferson put himself in the position to do the things people criticize him for. Therefore I will exte…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:29 AM
2

Duh. Patriarchy has infected nearly everything American culture even the stuff that looks like it’s for women. Just so you know Feminists have been making the exact point you think you just discovered since the early 1900s . The “dominant, brooding male lead” isn’t some new insight into female desire; Simone de Beauvoir literally wrote a whole section on this shit saying it created a world where women chase after a ridiculous need “to be loved, to please and make herself the Other” Essentially o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:21 AM
0

Idk about EQ but regular intelligence in men is almost never seen in this sub from men. How else do you explain post after post like this totally void of basic logic and full of fallacies. Look at your post man (in italics) and see my notes. When you know better maybe a woman will notice you in real life, we love intelligence especially more than whines - Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men. (fallacies - bare assertion/ipse dixit, hasty generalization) Whenever I hear this st…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:14 AM

Why not ask this in the post you are referencing, to the women you are talking about, so you can get the answer from the women who actually said it? How did those women come to represent many of us? It makes no sense to frame the issue as something most women think or many women think when most women (straight ones at least) are attracted to men. Many women might not be attracted to you, but that's different. There are a lot of men in this sub who would do themselves a favor by studing a basic l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 11:24 PM
13

WHen has Cardi B rapped about not needing a man, she literally says she fights over dick and her man. She is constantly in a relationship and popping out somebodys baby. You sound like an out of touch old man from 1996 wih this old ass anlysis. I love my fiance and when i say I don't NEED him its because I don't. But I am with him because I WANT him in my life theres a difference. If you prefer a woman who NEEDS you, then that means you want a dependent ...not an adult who is your equal. Men who…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:02 PM

Is this a fact? I notice a lot of men here, the so-called "logical" sex, believing their personal observations = a pattern. I could use that to say things about every man but that would be stupid. I understand hasty generalizations help your confirnation bias but of you want real answers seek good data.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 02:10 PM
2

Didn't know there was a victim here. I thought we were talking about an adult male who chooses to watch content and let it affect his relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:13 PM
6

I'm more concerned that you had the time/ability to ensure the gender of over 500k people in the comments. And maybe your friends wife think's he's less of a man because he's basing his self worth on a trend on tiktok and not real life. That's not adult like so its inherently non manly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:09 AM
0

Go out and talk to women in person, none talk like this. Men will always lose in the dating app arena becasue so much of it is based on image only and many men aren't putting in the time that women put into to their images and photos. Thats okay, becasue there are a lot of women out there, like me, who don't even like pretty guys or traditionally attractive men. Its funny because to me, my fiance is sexy af, but when he and his sister roast each other she alwasy points out something that I guess…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:51 AM

LOL @ you thinking we care to have your sympathy or anything from you. No abused woman has ever sat in a womans shelter alone and said "If I only had some randos sympathy" The entitlement of some men, I swear... Its one thing t say you don't care but its another thing to assume anybody gives a fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 06:28 AM
-7

Its so weird how you spend so much time people watching and creating grand narratives about peoples lives from the few minutes you watched these people.This is a trend here I've noticed and it's ridiculous on its face if you think about it. Even if you stared at them the entire time, its still not enough time to get the full picture that explains their relationships/dating trends. Do people ever get annoyed at how much you stare at them and make up stories in your heads about what they are doing…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 08:08 AM
3

Many people vote against their interests but men who support Republicans because they think they'll be wealthy one day are in fact stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 08:01 AM
-2

Too many men here pay too much attention to what other men are or arent doing often not even really getting a full story f whats going on but running with whatever notions they can from observing those men and think thats how life is supposed to work. If you feel the need to think about what men need to do or what men are doing, you need to snap out of it and mind your own damn business. Thre are no steadfast rules to the game, some women love overly emphatic men and some don't. These are indivi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 04:48 AM
4

My opinion as a feminist is don't put your hands on people if you don\t expect to get hit back. No matter what the gender is. If you hit somebody, it's not wrong for them to hit you back. Now, often there are times when a man who is much bigger and stronger COULD be the bigger person and realize "hey this persons trying but not succeeding in hurting me but if I hit back it would cave their face in". That being said,if he does hit her back, he's not morally wrong, she is. I had an uncle who told …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 02:19 AM
2

I used to agree with this but then I realized I love LTR just not with most of the men who are out there. My fiance now is perfect for me. He's not clingy, all up on me every second, he's not jealous, he realizes we are two seperate individuals who want to be with each other becasue we love each others company. The only real disagreement we have is I don't like men fighting my battles for me and as long as its not physical, I don't need him stepping in just becasue its a man I'm having a conflic…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 11:17 PM
3

Yes all this works when you are dealing with a man who can take rejection. Problem is a lot of men, especially ones who only got into the hobby to meet women, get upset or weird. It also makes it weird for some women who prioritize mens feelings over being honest. Most men here would feel weird if their best friend/bro came up to them after a football game and was like "Yeah, I really only started watching football because I wanted you to suck my dick and balls. All the things you thought I was …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 06:31 AM
-1

We will never see eye to eye on this topic because the shit that most men seem to care about regarding dating isn't shit I or most women I know care about. So I guess we just will never know. Just like how you will never know the fear of having to wonder if the dude you just met who's 3 ft taller and 150 lbs bigger than you is a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 10:12 PM
17

There would be no orgasm gap if what you are saying was true. Fact is some women are married with kids and have never had an orgasm
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 06:45 PM
7

They don't pretend to be liberal but a lot do pretend to be apolitical (which really is just conservative but lazy or mealy mouthed)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 11:25 PM
3

Toxic masculinity is gendered because it’s a set of behaviors society teaches boys to perform it doesn’t mean women can’t be violent, but men are disproportionately punished and pressured by these norms
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 09:11 PM
5

Legal equality on paper doesn’t guarantee fairness in practice. Both rich and poor are ‘equally’ forbidden from sleeping on park benches but only the poor need to. Conservatives used to argue sodomy bans werent discriminatory because gay and straight people were ‘equally’ banned from gay sex, but in reality it was a gay punishment. That’s why focusing only on formal legal equality misses how power, privilege, and social conditions make the law fall unevenly in real life. When it comes to reprodu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 09:07 PM
1

So we're doomed to hear about how straight white men are victims forever? ugh
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:59 PM
1

How would you know, we;ve never had a chance to see anything close to this? But we do know it's the truth with men being in charge. I don't understand how feminists are getting blamed for something that men created
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:57 PM
2

Yet it's men that created and keep the draft in place. Most feminists I know of are anti war and don't want anybody drafted
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:56 PM
1

Oh lord... First of all, Rights ≠ equality. Women in the West have legal rights, but legal recognition and lived equality aren’t twins. Example: Women in the U.S. are still paid less on average, are underrepresented in executive positions and legislatures, and are more likely to face intimate partner violence. If feminism were “done,” women wouldn’t still be leaving the workforce disproportionately because childcare costs more than rent. Backlash isn’t proof of success. The rise of misogynist in…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:49 PM
2

Doing those things and doing them in a way you or the avg man thinks is sufficient are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:54 AM
2

Call it what you want, it's weird and controlling af. It blows my mind that some guys have the nerve to try to control their girlfriend’s clothes or friendships. It's okay for you to let her know how you feel about her clothes or her plans for the night so she can know you are insecure as hell and maybe you guys can work on that together. But if your gf wants to dress a certain way or hang out at clubs you don't like then you need to find another girl who doesn't do those things. What you're try…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:11 AM
2

His point: "Title IX has something to do with trials" Then uses "Judges found that Title IX have no substance of a real trial" to prove his point... Your reasoning skills prove one thing: You don't have to worry about Title IX at all, I doubt you are getting into any school anytime soon
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 02:54 PM
1

The state...as in other taxpaying people who didn't make the baby should be responsible instead of the person who in 2024 is having unprotected sex with somebody he\s not prepared to raise a kid with? There are SO many options available to men who don't want to be parents. This isn't the stone ages, we know where babies come from and when you knowingly engage in activity that could possibly produce a human being it's your responsibility. If the woman who must carry the child decides she doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 06:51 PM
1

first this is anecdotal. doesnt mean a lot of men have this problem, it probably just means the dudes you are around have this problem. Perhaps your friend group is too mealymouthed and limpwristed. Also, theres a difference between running something by your wife and asking her for.permission. People in relationships run things by their spouses because its common courtesy to.let your partner know your plans. That doesnt = asking for permission Finally, perhaps you keep.running into this because …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:45 PM
1

So your friend thinks it would be better if meeting basic needs were harder? I mean, I've heard a lot of luddite cliches before but that one is top tier. I wish I could go back in time and tell the people living in the Warsaw ghettos of the 40s how jealous I am that needs are difficult to be met and how they should have a surplus of satisfaction in life because of ,it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:07 AM
1

exactly. just because something changes, doesn't make it a problem. Perhaps people have gotten to the point where they are less delusional about who their real friends are. I have always been popular but I know I only have 3 real actual friends. Adults who claim to have more than 5 friends must be using the term in a liberal way
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:53 PM
1

It's not the same exact problem since most people would define loneliness differently. This also means it can't be approached as a societal problem because with different definitions of the problem come different solutions. For some people being lonely has everything to do with the fact that they can't find a significant other, while others are in relationships and,still feel lonely for many reasons, and some people are lonely because they don't have platonic relationships...everybody's situatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:48 PM
2

and you're in the first-world but experience second and third world poverty? You should get your shit together ASAP. I don't see how you can find time to debate on reddit wihile having your third-world problem, Arent you at risk of dying from diarrhea?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:29 PM
2

And men want to subject their wives to as much as possible and dominate them? What a weird thing to admit
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:25 PM
3

And i've seen the depths abuse can go to when a person has to stay in a relationship because their S/O is a provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:22 PM
4

It's because they are bad faith criticisms. Many people in these dating discussions will say anything that absolves them of responsibility of their sad romantic lives. Why is dating so messed up? Because women are gold diggers. Also: Why is dating so messed up? Because modern women are too career focused, Everything is about society but not their own lack of value
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:18 PM
5

I don't know any serious feminist who promotes hook-up culture. There are several who believe women should have the ability to hook-up with whoever they want, when they want but that's different. Saying women should have the freedom to do something is different from saying they should
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter