TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ComposerLast7741 Archive

View 6 posts and 91 comments by ComposerLast7741 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

when they're done having their fun you become special
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 09:42 AM
0

soo many words yet you fail to say anything substantial. Women want men that lead. Why is that triggering you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 05:51 AM
-3

I've never seen a man demolish his TV before but if you mean if I've seen it online, then ofcourse yes. I've also seen women react hysterically online and break things. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:40 AM
-6

This is in general and not isolated cases. Sure some men can also have psychological issues led by their emotions but for women it is almost 100%. Most woman will have their emotions heavily compromised due to their hormonal changes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:35 AM
-3

It is a biological fact. No amount of mental gymnastics can explain away the mood and psychological shifts a woman experiences during these events
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:32 AM
1

stating a fact of life is "misogyny 101"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:24 AM
-3

There are clear biological factors that affect women in ways men don’t experience. Hormonal cycles, menstruation, PMS, pregnancy, and perimenopause/menopause, all influence mood, energy, and emotional reactivity. The isn't a weakness as you seem to think. It's just scientific fact that women are more sensitive to external stresses because of the hormonal fluctuations they experience throughout their life
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:19 AM
-5

Respect doesn’t mean endless debate or stalling every major decision; it means your partner’s input is heard while someone ultimately takes responsibility when needed. Deferring in every instance sounds nice in theory, but in practice it often leads to indecision and tension. Good luck to you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:14 AM
-7

If you hear 'leadership' and immediately think 'child', you’re reacting emotionally to the word instead of the structure being described. When two adults can’t reach full agreement on a major decision, someone either has to take final responsibility or the relationship defaults to stalled compromises and quiet resentment. And yes, women are fundamentally more emotionally unstable than men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:12 AM
-8

Calling it patriarchy doesn’t automatically make it oppression. There’s a difference between authority and abuse, and collapsing them into the same thing is lazy thinking. I’m not arguing women should be servants or stripped of autonomy, I’m saying every stable system has a final decision-maker. When no one has clear authority, you don’t get harmony, you get quiet power struggles and stalled decisions. Someone has to absorb accountability when things go wrong, and historically men have taken tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:09 AM
7

Not wanting to explore the world with someone you love is because you are depressed. Wanting to do things but being unable to do them due to jobs, commitments etc.is fine. However if you are able to do things, and you still choose to do nothing, it's most likely a mental health issue. Most of the men that dread their partners talking and getting excited about trips are actually depressed and unhappy in their relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:31 AM
–

Many men also rewards their partners with sex. Not every man marries their type which they love to have sex with or has a high libido. Sometimes they just marry because there's other characters she has to be a good wife and mother. In those cases it is the men who reward the wife with sex
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:44 AM
2

whatever helps people sleep at night I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:41 AM
1

they stop having their fun Because: the guys they were chasing are no longer interested in them Their biological clock is ticking Chances to find someone for long-term is harder as they get older So they pick you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:32 AM
1

they are choosing you after they've had their fun and have their mental spankbank full
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:51 AM
-2

I also feel like I have no idea who was the “best I have ever had.” Longest orgasm? Longest duration of uninterrupted physical pleasure before orgasm? Most meaningful sex? Most physically attractive partner? Most pleasant experience overall? This is the conundrum that someone falls into when they have too much experience. They literally can't decide on who is the best in all categories as they just have too much data. So by default their current partner will never measure up on all aspects and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:16 AM
1

I don't believe you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:45 AM
-3

Everyman and woman deserves to feel they are the best their partner has ever had. If the bodycount of the man or woman is very high, there is a high liklihood their partner is not the best, but the one they settled for. That can put a strain on any relationship especially if one partner is less experienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:43 AM
2

how big is your sample size to determine that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:36 AM
6

casual sex is the only way to ensure you get STIs. There's many ways to know you're desirable as a man without getting your dick wet
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:19 AM
0

I'm taking a woman who desires me more than another man her own age off the market. how is that selfish? Why would I want a younger man to get a woman that settled for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:17 AM
2

how is dating younger selfish?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:13 AM
-4

another example of the cold calculating mind of a woman. Women simply cannot love like men can. For them, every relationship is a trade of goods and services. Thanks for this black pill post
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:57 AM
2

Is your man the best sex you've ever had?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:31 AM
2

"Ew, he bends over to tie his shoelaces" (this is latent homophobia, btw) wait what? how to do it? sitting down or crouching down? all actions involved bending over
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:18 AM
–

Saying “I just want a good guy” while surprisingly every man you choose and complain about has been an asshole Saying “looks don’t matter” while swiping right on only guys you find attractive Saying you want honesty and vulnerability, then getting the ick the second a guy actually shows it Just be honest with who you are and what you want and let go of this fear of finding out you are not actually as noble and good as you think
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 07:32 AM
-2

Young, inexperienced, classically attractive, minimal trauma, conservative, daddy issues
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 05:05 AM
–

stop being fake
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 04:42 AM
3

the women these type of men seek are not you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 04:33 AM
–

Women aren't inherently anymore toxic than children. Both are wire to be impulsive, reward-driven, terrified of boredom, incapable of long-term consistency without external structure. Problems occur for men once we try to deal with them as if we are on the same level. This "more communication" or more "empathy" is actually doing a disservice to both men and women as it simply is not how we are wired. Just like children, women need to be managed and only then can you have a successful relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:20 AM
3

risk throwing the doors of my life open to a human maelstrom of walking psychic malevolence like my ex wife was. Only men can truly understand what you went through
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:01 AM
–

There's a reason the rich were referred to as blue bloods in Europe. They never toiled outdoors so you could see the veins on their white skin more clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 06:32 AM
5

There's someone out there for every woman but not every man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 07:08 AM
0

woman have terrible sense of perception and can be easily fooled. And alot of men take advantage of that. Just look at all the responses which show men being overly overt as opposed to subdued which identifies that all the men know exactly what they need to do to get more girls and the girls are none the wiser.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 07:04 AM
2

I don’t think this has anything to do with men being scared of women’s abilities, that’s just a nice story people tell themselves. Societies don’t run on vibes or hypotheticals, they run on results, and historically men were the ones expected to deliver those results when things went wrong. Pointing at a few counterexamples doesn’t erase broader patterns, and emotional control isn’t proven by speeches or intentions, it shows up in who actually carries responsibility. Men tend to chase, women ten…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:21 AM
1

staged rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:15 AM
11

The solution is to stop listening to women period
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:04 AM
5

“keep his balls empty & his stomach full” Well obviously those are redeeming qualities. If an attractive wife only cares about her own sexual needs and doesn't cook for her husband, sleeping with her is going to get old fast. A less attractive wife that fulfills her husbands sexual desires and ensures house is kept organized and he's taken care of is much more desirable. Looks is important but it takes alot more than looks and bad sex to keep a man
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:35 AM
8

Plenty of men are tired of having sex with their attractive wives. You must have little to no experience with being in a long term relationship with an attractive woman with no other redeeming qualities. No matter how attractive a woman is, the longer you stay with her the less the novelty of sleeping with her becomes. An attractive woman still has to put in the work needed to keep her spouse happy the same way an attractive man has to put in the work
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:18 AM
–

You're calling it “mansplaining,” but what you’re really doing is shutting down any viewpoint that doesn’t match yours. If you want to debate ideas, you can’t start by dismissing the other side because you don’t like the sound of it. MGTOW being “Black Pill” is your label, not a universal truth. And your claim that men in general don’t do their fair share? That’s a sweeping generalization, not research. Yes, women often do more unpaid labor in heterosexual households. That doesn’t mean all men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:43 AM
0

high bodycount women are more likely to cheat and divorce you than women with lower n believe it or not, many high n count women also stay in relationships. However in those relationships it's the man that suffers trying to get over her high n count. Eventually those turn toxic as the man can truly never get over it and the woman is too entitled to understand his mental struggle. Check out retroactive jealousy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:32 AM
1

There are two selection processes for both men and women. Who they attracted to purely for sex Who they are attracted to purely for a stable longterm relationship The reality is women know when they pick 1. and when they pick 2. They know 1. will be a toxic mess but they still choose that over 2. And they know when to pick 2. when they reach that stage in their life of needing stability. The biggest lie ever told is thinking women don't know what they're getting into when they accept a man into …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:11 AM
–

I don't think you understand what the Black Pill means. Black pill doesn't mean hating the opposite sex. It means realizing the realities of the world. Everything you posted paints a very emotional and defensive woman who clearly hates men. And with regards to your post, there's tons of men that go about their lives alone and are able to wash dishes and dress themselves. And there are tons who women who are terrible mothers. Doesn't mean all women are bad though does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:03 AM
3

Drama is the source of stimulation. Drama is the result of a lack of stimulation. That's why drama rarely exists at start of a relationship due to the honeymoon phase. Everything is new and exciting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 05:44 AM
1

Yes, men who offload responsibility and turn their partner into a mom deserve to be left. No argument there. That part is obvious. What’s dishonest is pretending that’s usually why women leave, and that they’re walking into the arms of some “actually good guy.” If being “good” were enough, stable, responsible men wouldn’t get dumped, cheated on, or dead-bedroomed at scale. They do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 05:25 AM
4

You’re half right. It's not drama they crave, it's stimulation. Women are not seeking drama, they are seeking a man who is heading somewhere as opposed to stagnation. There needs to be a purpose, a drive, something to look forward to each day. If nothing is changing in their spouse and he seems happy with the status quo, that is when women lose interest. And unfortunately in a desperate attempt to stir up something in the relationship, women start drama and the toxicity keeps it alive. Men need …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 05:16 AM
0

You don’t understand what empathy actually is. Empathy isn’t performative softness or emotional validation on demand. It’s awareness without self-sacrifice. I can understand how you feel without rewarding disrespect, volatility, or entitlement. That’s the part you’re missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:14 AM
-1

I don't think you know what empathy means
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:11 AM
-5

Reserving empathy is pretty cold and calculated. It shows it doesn't come naturally to you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:59 AM
–

I guess then you optimized the wrong goal. You chased access to multiple women and got disappointed with the results. That’s not growth, it’s consequences forcing a new perspective. Fuck-ups don’t equal wisdom by default. Most people just slap meaning on disappointment after the fact. But I see your point
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:58 AM
3

have you ever heard the phrase "if everyone is an asshole to you, chances are you're the asshole". Maybe if you stopped demonizing all men, you won't only attract the 'bad ones'
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:52 AM
–

Growth is intentional improvement, not post-event learning and rationalization. What you’re describing is touching the stove, getting burned, then declaring that learning to not touch the stove is growth. Learning something after consequences isn’t growth, it’s adaptation to failure
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:47 AM
4

“Good” doesn’t exist. It’s a coping myth. You are the people you draw into your life. If those people suck, chances are you suck too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:42 AM
–

Calling that growth is cute, champ. You didn’t evolve, you just learned you’re not built for the game you thought you were. Reality checked your ego and suddenly it’s “not your jam.” Classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:31 AM
6

The sad truth most of what you call “experience” is just choosing losers and acting shocked when they behave like losers. This meme of men 'tricking' women into relationships by pretending to be perfect and then showing their ugly side later is very rare. Most of the time it's women refusing to recognize the pig wearing lipstick as a pig as they just want the relationship to work for their own reasons/egos
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:03 AM
–

Quitting after getting burned isn’t growth BTW. It's damage control. only “Good rizz” get access? So it only takes a bullshit artist to open your legs? I hope this is a troll account cause this is sad af. High standards matter before, not after, you’ve already given yourself away.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:53 AM
–

I honestly feel bad for your current or future partner. You openly admit you give your body, attention, and intimacy to men who meet the lowest bar, then turn around and demand a laundry list of virtues from the man you want to take you seriously. You're literally devaluing yourself and gas lighting yourself to think it's empowerment. You’re teaching men that access to you is cheap, while commitment requires premium pricing. And the orgasm stats don’t help your case. They just underline the iron…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:42 AM
-2

You didn’t “transcend” attraction, you're basically throwing a tantrum and opting out. Most men aren’t begging; they’re calibrated. You call it weakness because it hurts less than admitting you don’t inspire desire without withholding it. “Leaving fast” isn’t power, it’s pre-emptive rejection. Teasing without warmth is just low stakes cowardice with a smirk. Real men don’t announce they’re assessing. They don’t need a manifesto to justify why no one’s reacting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:24 AM
1

it's very simple. Some men vet from the very start by not leading with their best behavior. They don’t over-give, over-chase, or over-accommodate. They stay blunt, limited, and a bit harsh to see who sticks around. If a woman stays only when she’s being treated exceptionally well, she’s attached to the treatment, not the man. The ones who stay through minimal effort are showing they’re there for him. That’s the filter.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:21 AM
3

You literally opened with “I disagree".... But everything you wrote after that assumes attraction is already there and effort comes later. That’s not a counterargument, it’s the same 'shit' just with more emotional talking points. If you agree, fine. Just don’t start by calling it a disagreement and then act confused when people point out you ended up saying the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:28 AM
1

You’re kind of proving the point while trying to argue against it. Everything you describe happens after attraction already exists. Wanting flowers and dates from a man you’re already in love with doesn’t mean courting created the attraction, it means effort feels nicer once desire is already there. And when you say “it can really suck to be in love with a man who never gives flowers or takes you on dates,” you’re admitting something important: a woman can deeply love a man who doesn’t treat her…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:14 AM
2

Hard disagree. If desire is there, it shows up fast. When it isn’t, people invent morals, vetting rituals, and personality TED talks to justify the lack of spark. Calling that “values” doesn’t magically turn disinterest into virtue. You say red pill men don’t understand vetting while literally describing it, just for traits you wish mattered more. Confidence, presence, sexual polarity come first. Your preferred criteria are consolation prizes when those aren’t there. And women sleeping with men …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:09 AM
0

once every 2 weeks is bordering on dead bedroom status my guy. Sex shouldn't be scheduled but be natural and should occur the moment one party is horny. For a relationship to work, sex should never be negotiated or scheduled
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:26 AM
3

You want men to not appreciate their attractive sexual partners beautiful vagina?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:07 AM
2

Female vaginas on women I find attractive are extremely hot
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:06 AM
-2

What is soo confusing? If a man is truly desired, a woman is physically aroused, sex doesn’t feel “terrible,” and orgasms/or lack thereof aren’t the issue. The bad sex you’re talking about only happens with men who aren’t wanted, and that’s why it’s bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:37 AM
-2

I repeat, if a man is truly desired, a woman is physically aroused, sex doesn’t feel “terrible,” and orgasms or lack of aren’t the issue. The bad sex you’re talking about only happens with men who aren’t wanted, and that’s why it’s bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:36 AM
–

Exactly. If I'm actually attracted to him it's automatically great. Good sex is about attraction and chemistry, not technique. Finally a woman who truly is with someone she desires and can speak from experience. It feels like most here are forcing themselves to be in relationships they don't want
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:35 AM
0

Then the problem was never his penis,it was that she wasn’t actually interested in him to begin with. Desire decides everything, performance only matters when it was never going to be earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:26 AM
4

“Naive” because you refuse to admit that desire exists before technique. Talking to women doesn’t change reality, if she truly wants you, sex rarely fails; if she doesn’t, no conversation or method will make it matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:22 AM
4

If you’re analyzing a man’s every move in bed, demanding checklists, effort, and constant adjustment, you’ve never actually felt true desire for him in the first place. Desire doesn’t work like a spreadsheet, when it’s real, none of this micromanaging matters. The fact you need all this effort to manufacture attraction just proves it was never there to begin with, and no amount of communication or “learning” will make a man you don’t actually want suddenly desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:21 AM
0

Funny how women suddenly start caring about “technique” after marrying men they never really desired. I’ve already mentioned how imagination inflates men they desire into something special, even when in reality they weren’t. Then they try to hold that same feeling for new, less desirable partners and end up sabotaging the relationship. Desire does all the work, everything else is just busywork for men who were never truly wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:19 AM
4

Frustrated? That’s just her admitting she never wanted you. Desire drives everything,skill only matters when you were never going to be wanted in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:18 AM
3

Confidence isn’t a substitute for desire, if she wants you, your “skills” barely matter, and if she doesn’t, delusion won’t save you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:16 AM
-9

If sex “kills desire” it’s not him,it’s that you never actually wanted him. The men you’re sleeping with aren’t the ones you truly desire, so you rely on sex to manufacture attraction that’s already weak. Most women don’t orgasm with their partners and still live happy, fulfilling lives because they can take care of themselves if they need to. Complaints about the bedroom only happen when desire is missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:16 AM
1

Then congratulations, you just proved my point, when desire is real, phoning it in barely matters; the only time sex “kills” attraction is when it was never there to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:13 AM
1

You’re missing the point,if she’s genuinely into you, a minute in bed doesn’t kill desire. what you call being “turned off” is just a lack of real attraction from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:07 AM
0

Hypnotized? No. Simply selective. What happens under the sheets only matters if she wasn’t already sold, otherwise, every misstep gets glorified.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:06 AM
1

If orgasms were the engine of desire, women wouldn’t chase men who give them none and drop men who try hard but fail, yet that pattern repeats constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:58 AM
-2

Bad sex is only a dealbreaker when desire is weak, and calling technique an amplifier is just a polite way of admitting the attraction was never doing the heavy lifting in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:57 AM
0

That meme exists because disappointment is an easy, socially acceptable exit.When attraction is strong, mediocre sex gets contextualized and forgiven. When it is weak, sex becomes the justification. Performance only turns into a “burden” when she is already unsure and looking for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:57 AM
5

If sex were the ultimate test, men wouldn’t pass it in under a minute and still get praised. What you are describing is performance anxiety dressed up as theory. When a woman wants you, sex confirms what she already decided. When she doesn’t, it becomes an exam you were never going to pass. The fact you think 80 percent happens after the clothes come off tells me you are already negotiating attraction instead of having it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:51 AM
1

Yeah no but that’s ok
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:08 PM
-6

ok and? Nothing you are stating refute my points.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:06 PM
6

What’s odd is pretending discernment is impossible only when accountability enters the room. People sort for jobs, friends, roommates, and risk every day, suddenly sex is the one domain where pattern recognition is “unknowable”? No one said “perfectly.” Just better than random before access is granted. If someone can’t identify any disqualifying traits until after allowing the man to insert his penis into their vagina, that’s not complexity, that’s willful blindness and deliberate ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:31 AM
5

No one said harassment, assault, or proximity equals “choice.” The claim is about who gets romantic access and repeated benefit of doubt, not who exists in public space. Different domains. Blurring them avoids the argument, it doesn’t defeat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:29 AM
9

Of course they presented well. No one argued predators announce themselves. But “they fooled me” repeated indefinitely stops being bad luck and starts being a filter problem. Pattern recognition cuts both ways, generalizing men is fine, but discussing female selection is suddenly unfair?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:28 AM
2

A lot of deflection, very little refutation. Calling everything “not gendered,” “both sides,” or “vibes” doesn’t negate patterns,it just avoids sitting with them. You don’t need credentials to observe incentives and outcomes. Dramatic? Maybe. Incorrect? You didn’t actually show that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:26 AM
2

agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:25 AM
1

You didn’t respond to anything I actually said. I wasn’t talking about looks or “settling”; I was talking about trust versus attention. Dragging it back to “average Becky” just proves the point, you’re still stuck in a shallow framework and calling it insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 09:24 AM
9

You’re still talking about people like market assets, and that’s the core problem. “Pek SMV” might explain who looks at you, but it says nothing about who will actually stand with you when life turns ugly. Attention isn’t success. Commitment is. And spreadsheets don’t build families. A man doesn’t need to maximize options at 35. He needs a ride-or-die partner who chose him for his character, not because his stats finally look good. If your mindset is “I earned better women now,” you didn’t matur…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 04:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter