TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ComputerJerk Archive

View 0 posts and 91 comments by ComputerJerk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you think Socialism is the establishment of inequality then I think your understanding of the purpose of socialism is somewhat perverse.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:13 PM
0

I thought the issue was not legally enforced equality but rather attempts to create inequality under the guise of systemic victimization. If you believe feminism is the creation of legal protections against gender discrimination and nothing else, then what's the issue? Equality should be guaranteed in law, to do so isn't to become socialist it's to respect everyone equally. The problem most MRAs have is that isn't the perceived goal of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:43 PM
5

a leftist philosophy that is a stepping stone to a communist/socialist state. I'm honestly really not sure I follow the logic here... Worst case scenario it's women attempting to wrest more than their fair share of control from men which would be the opposite of a leftist/socialist policy. The only thing they really have in common is the potential for 'redistribution of wealth' which in this case is just asset seizure through entitlement, which rings far more in tune to the tendencies of those o…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:46 PM
2

It's strange but I often find myself drawn to women in need. I think it's because helping somebody else helps to give me a sense of worth even though really I just end up taking their baggage off of them and suffering in their place. I'm not sure if that's necessarily gender biased in any way, but then men are often expected to sacrifice their pay cheque/wellbeing/etc to be supportive of a spouse. Women are not necessarily expected to be burdened with their partners issues, I think partially due…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:38 PM
1

Not only that but amongst the male characters you have a professional hunter and two police officers whilst the women were not from such ideal post-zombie-apocalypse backgrounds. Really that's just the writers dealt them. If there were 3 paramilitary females in the group then I suspect they'd be guarding the shit out of the camp.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:50 PM
7

I'm glad he was one of the lucky few, emphasis on both lucky and few.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:21 PM
11

Isn't that exactly the kind of reasoning that pro-lifers always use? And of course hindsight is 20/20 and rosetinted, you never know how things would have turned out. I know it sounds cold but your father is unlikely to broach the topic of being financially strained because of your being born, he's also pretty unlikely to tell you how you made his life harder if he's trying to build a relationship.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:35 PM
23

Because pornography is a restricted material and distributing it intentionally to minors is not only illegal but a breach of trust. Like somebody said, the situation would be entirely reversed if a male teacher was making pictures of his junk available to the young girls in his class.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:46 AM
2

No I did not.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:58 AM
4

If that's all you're taking away from what I just wrote then you're right about about the large swaths of stupid.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:54 AM
3

They're electronic information sharing platforms, in that sense they are fundamentally identical. The only difference is the audience, on Facebook you can choose to only share (as most do) with people in your life where-as on Reddit you generally are sharing in public with little control on the visibility. But ultimately, they serve the same purpose. You reading Reddit posts is no different to most people reading Facebook shares and statuses. So tl;dr: Uhhhhhhhhh reddit reddit reddit who the hel…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:46 AM
4

The same people who care about other similar websites, like Reddit
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:25 AM
1

I'm glad that we can establish that you're a troll up front so I can ignore anything else you post :)
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:42 PM
3

The devil is in the detail, if it was produced to provide sexual gratification as it's primary purpose then it can be ruled obscene. If not, you should always be free to express yourself. Art is generally above and beyond the sole base purpose of providing sexual stimulation so almost all of it would be exempt. Dirty paintings, nude baby album covers, the film lolita... These things are fine. When somebody wants to draw a picture of little girls to jerk off to... That's child porn. It's a diffic…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:08 PM
3

I edited my last post to clear up the differences. tl;dr: You can have a movie that isn't a porno but you can also have cartoons that are. If it's porn and it has kids in it it's child porn. If it's a film with kids getting shagged in it, it's not necessarily child porn.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:44 AM
1

I'm going to need some proof of this one Found it myself. Basically the law agrees with me though with one caveat. All pornography featuring children is child pornography, even if the pornography is rendered as drawings or animations (Which slightly disagrees with my interpretation of simulated/actual sex acts). In this case it's clear that if the intention of the item is solely to provide sexual gratification, it qualifies as pornography. In which case it is subject to illegality based on vario…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:24 AM
21

Edit: OP is a manhood academy troll, do yourself a favour by downvoting and moving on you'd be arrested for making child porn Uh, no you wouldn't? There is a clear difference between creating actual pornography where the actors engage in genuine sex-acts and adult cinema where actors simulate sex acts. There are films that have portrayed underage relationships, rapes, murders, etc. These are not illegal because they are cinema and not recordings of actual underage relationships, rapes or murders…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:59 AM
19

My phone was free too, but for some reason I keep getting billed for using it.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:38 AM
1

Not if I already know they're going to agree with me no matter what I say, I don't keep yes-men as friends.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:50 AM
1

And doing so in a community almost guaranteed to back you on anything that can be even vaguely construed as an MRA issue is one way to get biased results to your suppositions.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:09 PM
1

For a start describing it as a thesis is incredibly generous. He created his own narrative based on seemingly nothing and wrapped it in a soft-sell upvote grab topic. I'm not denying the fact that yes, relationships can have a negative impact in achieving ones goals but to suggest that this is the general case is non-sense. Many people fail to achieve great things and are single their whole lives - Many people achieve everything and more with the support of their partners. You can not make blank…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:01 PM
2

How about anecdotal evidence of any kind? Is there some kind of surplus of testamonials on behalf of James Holmes saying that his actions were in any way caused by his being a virgin? I've yet to read a single reliable article that suggests it is in any way related to anything other than tabloid headlines. How about the droves of sexless academics? I mean University is only regarded as one of the most promiscuous periods for anybody who attends but you must have some circumstantial evidence that…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:28 PM
3

Whilst I agree with your general point about virgin shaming being wrong, I contest this however: [Virgin shaming] is stopping [the world] from advancing as fast as it could. It’s quite well known that the most studious among people, especially men, are often virgins. It’s those people, however, that create the greatest scientific, technological, and other forms of progress. You really honestly believe this? What on earth do you base that on? How do you explain the many married nobel prize winner…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:23 PM
7

To all the shamed virgins out there, you are not missing much; and you may be better of with much less shit in your life... Come on, is that really the right message? Sex is an amazing thing, a cocktail of emotions and experiences you literally can not enjoy in any other way. Sex forms an integral and healthy part in any relationship allowing people to really solidify their bonds with one another with the most basic of desires. Not to mention, sexual chemistry is an important factor in the longe…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:13 PM
-3

For what it's worth I actually agree with you. I think too many people ignore the fact that having children is a life-style choice and costs the family as a whole a huge amount of money. You did indeed pay your wife to chill for 26 years, I bet you couldn't even get 6 contiguous weeks off to enjoy yourself and she had 26-years to do more or less whatever she liked. The whole time you not only fed, clothed and kept her but you also fed, clothed and kept your children. Assume for one second she wa…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:22 AM
1

So we're not allowed to call a spade a spade? I understand that it's not the most mature language to use but if the judgement is valid then is the language really altogether that important?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:45 PM
1

It's actually because Redditors are significantly more likely to click an imgur link than anything else. Most redditors I know just open 30+ imgur tabs then read through them.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 08:11 AM
15

Don't blindly downvote this comment, it's a legitimate point. Many of us choose not to identify with feminism for this reason and instead adopt a the more neutral descriptor egalitarian. You can't just start calling yourself a Nationalist Socialist without the mistakes and opinions of others being applied to yourself as collateral.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:21 PM
8

Isn't that exactly what actors are paid to do?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:14 PM
1

It's a ridiculously piece of reality TV, if you want to complain about it feel free to do so. As I've said in other places, this is not a men's rights issue and I really don't see why we're so offended in the first place.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:24 PM
1

Tell that too all the bored MRAs who have decided that today we must be petty about everything we see... It's sad to think of all the real issues we need to address and we upvote this trash to the front page.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:23 PM
1

In all fairness, mine was at least related. It was an example of outrageous things we've done in the name of entertainment (I can list more recent examples if that helps) and in response he likened these forms of entertainment to nuclear atrocity and torture... So I really don't follow the relevance.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:22 PM
1

Perhaps but that's not an issue of men's rights, that's an issue of small minded people liking small minded things.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:50 PM
-9

So you're likening reality TV between willing participants who are there entirely voluntarily to the act of water-boarding? I know it was an illustration of scales but could you have picked any two more incendiary comparisons?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:30 PM
0

Nobody who willingly submits to being a participant on a reality tv-show is any better than an animal. They're just the bears being jabbed with hot-pokers and made to dance. The subject matter of the show is almost irrelevant, this is not a political broadcast it's a tv-show for the lowest common denominator who will one day reduce themselves to watching hypnotoad.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:26 PM
-8

As a species we used to throw people to the lions for our own amusement and you're offended by the premise of couples exacting mild revenge on one another for cash and our entertainment? You're blowing this so far out of proportion I'm not even sure how to best respond.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:16 PM
-1

I don't fully understand the allegory but I know enough to know that some awful reality TV shows don't suddenly alter the way we think and live our lives nor are they prevailing patterns in the real world. Reality TV shows are escapist pseudo-realities and the ideals they represent are usually manufactured.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:59 PM
-3

And those calls would come from a vocal minority and we would tell them it's a harmless bit of fun on reality TV and is not representative of a greater problem or the general opinion that we should torture our girlfriends. Because it's quite rightly an absurd thing to complain about. This is such an inconsequential nothingness of an issue to be riding the top of the front page of /r/MensRights. Tomorrow when we all forget about it we can hopefully return to addressing the actual issues at hand.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:38 PM
2

I think we should be concerned first and foremost with pursuing equal rights under the law as men. If you are upset because a show where adults consensually humiliate themselves on television for the insipid fools who actually want to watch it then feel free to go write a letter. Ultimately, it hasn't hurt you. It is not representative of some great scheme to torture all boyfriends in electric chairs for cheating... Its just some idiots hurting themselves for our amusement. Tomorrow I'll forget …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:36 PM
-6

And this is /r/MensRights not /r/MensIssuesWithSociety. The rights are equal here, the complaint is petty nonsense which is what we're constantly arguing against.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:18 PM
0

Well given that I was replying to a vacuous post supposing a what-if scenario that is not concretely evidenced (Shows that degrade women are not exactly uncommon) I don't see the issue.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:55 AM
-26

It would also be a problem if the sun imploded and the earth was swallowed up into a black hole. Luckily neither of these things are based in actual events :) Edit: Sarcasm not welcome, understood. Doesn't change the fact this is ridiculous and we're being upset by a double-standard that is not enforced legally at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:04 AM
-8

I don't see how fighting this double standard is 'playing right into the same ridiculous rhetoric we argue against every day'. For a start it is allowed. You could easily make a show with the reverse concept but I very much doubt anybody would care. There would be some contention from women's lobbyist groups and we would sit here and tell them they're being ridiculous. That's how you're playing right into the same rhetoric. It's a damn TV show, if you want to get upset about every silly TV show …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:08 AM
-2

It does not legitimize it in real life at all, you're playing right into the same ridiculous rhetoric we argue against every day. A rape joke is note a rape, a crappy tv show is not real life.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:52 AM
0

I've no doubt and I personally dislike his personality and his policies. However, he's an MP. He was elected to be the voice of members of this country that represent different ideals to me, he should be heard and respected for that.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:29 AM
1

An MP is an MP, to disrespect him is to disrespect the people who elected him.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:14 AM
157

It's TV Entertainment, the men signed up to be degraded. It's pretty pathetic but an MRA issue? Hardly... Lets not get upset about consenting adults being morons for cash.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:11 AM
1

I never suggested they weren't different but rather that you can't excuse a woman for lying just because there's a baby involved instead of an STI. For a start, rape is a bit of a dramatic overstatement if your main concern about no condom is the transmission of diseases. That's assault, not rape. I would, however, have to suggest that lying about birth control and therefore encouraging the man not to use protection is much more damaging than potentially spreading diseases around. Sure, pregnanc…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:11 AM
14

Thanks for the clarification and the voice of reason. However... You're not going to catch HIV from a girl because she doesn't use the pill. No, instead you'll be fiscally responsible for a child you were 99% assured would not be born. There is no "She lied about birth control" exemption clause when it comes to child support.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:51 AM
1

Then get a story from this century then, don't drag articles up from half a decade ago.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:59 AM
2

Stiff upper lip chums, crying is for ponces
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:32 PM
0

So we needed to smear a company for something they said years ago? I'm not saying it's not relevant but it's being reported like this is another example in a rash of events... Which it isn't
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:24 PM
4

This is from 2006... Why are you on the front page?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:43 PM
4

He's not A British Mayor, he's The Mayor of London. I mean come on... We just had the Olympics and he was in every other camera shot of the stadium!
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:50 PM
4

The victim of what exactly? You are at the store with your kids any interaction with your children from a stranger is unwarranted and troublesome. If she took the "Pedophiles and kidnappers walk free!" angle she would have to justify that claim... At which point she'd have to admit that she approached your children without rhyme or reason to suspect they were in any way distressed. You, as the parent in the situation, correctly reported a suspicious woman approaching children that were not her o…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:16 AM
9

That's why you guys have a Video referee now, just like the store had video recordings.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:08 AM
17

And would be instantly discredited by eye witnesses and the store manager.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:03 AM
15

Why do you sign your Reddit posts?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:26 PM
36

Drugged, bound and brutally murdered. How many more different ways could this possibly constitute premeditated murder...
/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:26 PM
1

You have done nothing but give me the impression you are not the sort of person I wish to hear more from. If you 'don't have time' to have a conversation on Reddit, please refrain from aggressively tossing assertions around at people who are just curious. It discourages people from participating. Edit: Interesting that the comment has been removed, yet a downvote remains <3 Reddit
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:42 PM
1

I'd be interested in seeing a legal precedence for the situation I'm describing or laws that deal exclusively with the topic. I'm mostly not understanding the attitude in your post...
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:15 PM
2

That doesn't solve the problem where both parties can claim to not have given consent through intoxication, does that make both people rapists?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:21 PM
4

The thing that vexes me is how is what you do when you're drunk not your responsibility? Crying rape because you slept with a guy drunk you wouldn't have sober is like accusing taxi drivers everywhere of being thieves because they drive drunk people home for money. We all do things drunk we wouldn't do sober (Isn't that usually the point?) but we're responsible for what or who we chose to do.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:29 PM
5

Also the deferred responsibility for your actions and choices while intoxicated are often troublesome. The notion that somehow your drunken consent is invalid palms responsibility off for making that judgement to a third party who is also likely intoxicated. I've never understood how that worked.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:31 AM
1

Most companies make allowances for some personal browsing during the day or on breaks, but under no circumstances would you be allowed to view illegal or illicit materials including but not limited to pornography. Have you ever worked in an office in your life?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:02 PM
10

The same can be said for many uncircumcised genitals the difference being the choice to get the operation and incur the risks associated with it is entirely at their discretion later in life. I can get cut if I wanted to, can you grow another foreskin?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:27 AM
2

Huh... Wow... I'm getting down voted for asking for some consideration? I'm baffled by that. To answer your question: No. I'm in the UK and misuse of company Internet is grounds for termination in most places. Check your company policies on the matter if you don't believe me.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:24 AM
2

Don't know why you're getting downvoted, whilst not sexual it's pretty easy for a coworker or boss to either mistake it as such or conclude that it must be since it's partial nudity. A NSFW tag, whilst somewhat puritan, wouldn't have cost anything and might be the difference between someone losing their job and not.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:16 PM
1

When you read the stories in context and not with the Daily Mail prejudiced it's not nearly as outrageous as it sounds. We tolerate threatening/Racist/Discriminatory public statements a lot more seriously than our children across the pond.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:05 AM
7

Don't play the reddiquette card, the burden of proof lies with the person who made the original assertion. Without proof, that assertion can be cast aside with prejudice. If I were to ask you to prove that magnetism fairies didn't exist in /r/science I'd expect to be downvoted into oblivion too.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:47 AM
3

I had my front tooth rebuilt in 10 minutes after a work accident, the dentist also squeezed in a scale and polish for me. This was at like... 8 AM. NHS Price of £48, which of course I billed to work.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:02 PM
6

A chipped tooth can be repaired in under 10 minutes by a competent dentist, it's ridiculously trivial.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:25 AM
0

Illegal and unpublishable are two different things. However, I haven't seen the actual complaint that lead to this being "Banned".
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:43 PM
2

I know what you mean, I think the difference here is that Mumsnet is the community. If you took the community away, there would be very little to Mumsnet, unlike say... The comments on a news site. If you aren't endorsing the contributors at Mumsnet, what are you endorsing?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:21 PM
6

When you chose to sponsor it you're taking the community with the good and the bad. M&S is effectively paying for people to make comments like those you see there.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:09 PM
8

Do we really give a shit about what /r/AdviceAnimals says?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:59 PM
1

As someone late to reading this post I'm disappointed to find that a seasoned veteran believes we are imagining what we all know to be a reality. It does not set a good precedent for MRMs presence on Wikipedia...
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:48 PM
3

Which is very much part of the deal when you end your word with the suffix "ism".
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:37 PM
1

You've set an unnecessarily high bar of classiness with the classiest board game there ever was :(
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:29 PM
2

Unfortunately it didn't go to a porn site.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:16 PM
4

Did you submit this with the wrong link?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:16 PM
0

You have spent too much time being embittered by the usual ways of Reddit, had I really wanted to attract attention I would've posted a separate thread with the fixed tag. :) But fear not, I take your feedback on board!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:55 PM
0

Someone woke up without their cheerios this morning... Don't worry, we accept you regardless.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:24 PM
2

When writing the parody alternative version of this, I felt pretty disgusted with myself.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:35 AM
4

Absolutely nothing to do with Men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:10 PM
2

I quite probably did, it's difficult to carry on reading when I hit text like that. It's rife for quote mining, Atheist's learned to avoid that kind of language (even when used illustratively) for exactly that reason.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:54 PM
-2

Don't be angry. Man up. At this point I wasn't sure if your entire post was sarcastic... Isn't it this kind of gender discriminatory language we're trying to evolve past?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:07 AM
5

Still, it's successes like yours in spite of that stigma that give me a little hope for the future. Thank you, it's still a struggle but I've been off the meds 3 months now and I'm working on the nicotine addiction now :)
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:18 PM
8

As someone who has sought help from SW watch before and has been fighting depression for the last 18 months I can't say thank you enough for the effort you guys put in over at SW. As a 20-something guy, people are so quick to turn a blind eye when they see their male friends having a hard time, it just seems to be the culture. Though members of my family did express concern, other members of my family looked down on me when I went on medication (Which I found infinitely helpful) since it was a s…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:01 AM
2

I am curious to see what symbolism you read into that statement, though much of the Bible is rife with allegory and story telling... That is quite clearly an instruction. Please educate me :)
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:31 PM
2

Sure I guess I have time to assemble that flat pack furniture... This report can wait.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter