TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ComradeFurious Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by ComradeFurious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, and also its "91% of men who commit suicide.." not "91% of men who are in therapy.." which makes a big difference.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 02:47 PM
2

While I haven't seen that myself, its entirely possible someone out there is saying that. Regardless, I think I'm still confused about how that's connected to the original topic. Alex_Mercer_23 said that the above statistic debunks the hypothesis that men kill themselves because of toxic masculinity. I don't understand how that logically follows. Saying that 91% of men who commit suicide are in therapy, in the context of being critical of therapy, would seem to imply that either therapy does not…
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:09 AM
-1

Wait, i'm confused. How did toxic masculinity come up? My understanding is that toxic masculinity is a label used to criticize behaviors, i've never heard it listed as a reason people kill themselves. Are you using the term differently here, or did I misunderstand something?
/r/MensRights18/07/24 09:14 PM
6

91% men commiting suicide were in contact of some form of therapy. Careful what conclusions you draw from a statistic like that, there could be a massive selection bias at work; people who are thinking about killing themselves would be far more likely to contact a therapist.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 03:43 PM
1

Not at all, the laws exist as a safety net because people develop at different rates. The cut-off age has to be within reasonably limits because if you are independent and living away from your legal guardians by age 25, how could this law be enforced? You've already become a functional adult.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:31 PM
1

No one can speak for the psychological development of another person, and so its just a consequence of realizing that if you were ready at 14, and had to wait until 16 to consent legally, you have lost much less then someone who wasn't ready and may have been pressured into consenting because of a bad situation. Clearly individuals at some point have to be treated as adults and responsible for their own actions, but the law exists as a sort of safety net.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:25 PM
1

Perhaps, I can't speak to that with any certainty. Why do you ask?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:01 PM
31

What's the logic here, it seems backwards, even from her position. If a eight year old male can consent, and a female of the same age can't, does that imply males are more psychologically developed?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:58 PM
4

I understand the point you're making, and for a long time that was the way humans determined when a person was ready( i.e. no longer a child). However the idea with a specific age set higher then average pubescent age is suppose to reflect the knowledge that a person is not fully psychologically developed at pubescent.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:56 PM
6

I think people in general don't know what they want. Rather, they will genuinely want it and once they have it, meh, not so great.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:08 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the majority of states have 16 as the age of consent. I think there is a Wikipedia article on this somewhere. Found it: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_sexual_consent_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:40 AM
5

You've completely misunderstood; part of making a experiment scientific is controlling for variables, the idea is to test how a drug interacts with a specific part/function of the body. To do that accurately, you have to control for variables like hormone levels. If someone wants to test how a drug interacts with hormone levels at a later time, that would be fine, but you first need to make sure the drug works at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:57 PM
19

Men's Rights are Human Rights.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:55 PM
1

Likewise.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:36 PM
14

Watch out, he's going for his race card! I thought that line was genuinely funny.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:26 PM
1

I thought this was an excellent video on the subject.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:15 AM
21

Men don't automatically side with other men, so why would you think women are different? Some psychological studies have shown that men lack an own group preference and tend to favor women while women do not and often tend to favor women as well. I didn't have sources on hand but a quick search found this.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:30 PM
40

I noticed this happens a lot in gaming communities. Many times when a female gamers complains about the community being hostile to women I notice they are really just being treated like everyone else. The loss of special treatment must feel a lot like being attacked.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:10 PM
2

I disagree, if the other person is toxic the healthiest option is often to simple cut them from your life completely. Even family.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:18 PM
2

She was referring to two different things in those instances. The first was the truth of her being a tranny (sarcastic) and the second was whether or not her opinion was "The Truth".
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:15 PM
2

That isn't the kind of philosophy I would expect from Cthulhu's Baby.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:19 AM
7

She never came back to that point though, did she?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:50 PM
2

That is an excellent point, sir or madam.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:24 PM
5

I feel like his eyes are pretty clearly pointed at her face, not her tits.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:12 PM
12

Something probably came up, I'm sure they'll get back to us.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:29 AM
-2

Thats really a logical fallacy though; you can't prove a negative.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:41 PM
1

I don't know anything about Drow Tales, I was just making a reference to the theme song of DuckTales. :P
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:50 PM
2

DrowTales, Woohoo!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:37 PM
5

I usually get something along the lines of "I don't think you know what you're talking about." I try to tell them they don't have to believe me, because the information is out there for them to research on their own. They never do.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:13 PM
3

Hah! I hadn't noticed before, but he really does.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:14 AM
1

Hah! I actually laughed out loud at that.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:45 PM
1

Is this a repost? I remember reading this story last year.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:39 PM
32

11 signs you might be a straw man.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:23 PM
4

"Judge Peter Bowers said it was unfortunate that there was no anonymity for the men." Clear something up for me if you would. Is it that MEN don't get anonymity or that the ACCUSED don't? I'm pretty sure the judge said that because the majority of accused are men, but I want to make sure I have this straight.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:05 PM
11

If I understand correctly its a show to see how long they can last being insulted by the women. She can say anything, but isn't allowed to touch them. She says "Why don't you go fuck off" To which he replies "You go." Then she hits him. Why that would provoke her to violence is beyond me, its possibly the simplest reply he could have given.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:51 AM
2

/r/aww is a great place to go if you're feeling really pissed.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:22 PM
1

I thought that too, I was really excited for a second.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:18 PM
4

Isn't this a repost?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:45 PM
7

Well said.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:49 AM
3

You're not alone, and I don't think we're a minority. I think the writer has simply been taught to attribute his anger to being male, not human.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:22 AM
4

I feel like i'm only getting half this conversation, like you're talking to someone else I cannot see or hear. You keep bringing in new elements to this conversation, as if you're having trouble focusing. I do not wish to continue talking in circles. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:40 PM
14

Telling someone to be more ladylike often brings into question things like her body, her clothing, her choice of language, her sexuality, etc., whereas telling a man to be a gentleman suggests that he be nice, perhaps chivalrous. I mean this in the nicest way possible; you're bordering on willful ignorance at this point. Your refusing to accept that a man would ever have something like his appearence, language, or sexuality questioned. And that the only connotations are that he 'be nice, perhaps…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:15 PM
1

I only regret that I have but one upvote to give.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:26 PM
11

"Be a gentleman!" and "Man up!" are different cases: one is a generic way of saying to a man to be nice, and the other is much more like "Be a lady!"/"Be more ladylike!" You're still asserting that "be a gentleman" does not have similar behavior restrictions that "be a lady" does. This is incorrect, it has respectively inverse gender-role connotations.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:22 PM
13

If you knew it, why would you assert; Because asking a man to be a gentleman and a woman to be a lady are two different things with different connotations. It's never insulting to call someone a gentleman, but many people find it offensive to be called a lady. They are respective in terms of gender roles, and equally used to rebuke people for behaviors that are expected of them.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:00 PM
23

Women repeatedly hear people — both men and other women, family and strangers — tell them to "be ladies" or "act more ladylike." It's just so rude. Its a little solipsist for you to assume men never get that kind of treatment.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:51 PM
1

Usually it means someone who sticks around just long enough to benefit from everyones work and then disappears. Not really sure how its relevent in this case.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:58 PM
17

This is untrue. The body will react and prepare itself for intercourse regardless of mental consent. A man will harden and a women will get wet, it just happenes. I believe it is called a muscular erection.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:10 AM
1

I've heard this before, who said it?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:45 AM
2

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:06 AM
0

What I am saying is that isn't the collecting parents money, it is the child's money. That parent has no right to spend it on themselves, if the child is being provided for they do not need to be collecting so much money they can spend money that comes from the other parent on themselves. If you cannot follow this logic, which I think I have made rather clear, I don't know how else to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 01:49 AM
7

Thats one I really hate, if I want to get sex out of a relationship I should pay for her, buy her gifts, etc... but wait, when I get sex isn't she aswell? Why is mine worth less?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 01:42 AM
1

I'm not familar with the situation over there, what causes the adundance of available women?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 01:33 AM
0

No, I think you're out of line. No one is saying the support money shouldn't be spend on things that effect the children. What they are saying is that it shouldn't be spent on things that exist and function for only the parent. Like alcohol.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 11:37 PM
1

I don't think women with good careers intimidate men, I think they have less men to choose from and feel like men are intimidated. If a women wants to marry a man of equal or greater social/economical status she has less options when successful. Conversely, those men have more choices because of all the women below them on the social/economical ladder.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:36 PM
2

There doesn't seem to be anything here.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:20 AM
5

"First they ignore you..."
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:50 AM
4

I'm pretty new to the MRM and its always interesting to have my "Thats just the way it is" views challeneged. If I pay for everything, buy her gifts, etc. Haven't I objectified her? My car doesn't pay for its gas, or repairs, etc. If we split everything, isn't that really the way to treat someone as a equal? I'd say that the 'Asker pays' rule was fair if more women were willing to ask a man out, but it seems to be an uncommon occurrence.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:39 AM
52

The word dumb offends me, some people can't speak.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:03 AM
5

I think GWW addresses this really well. Rant for Nice Feminists and me, a Feminist? No way.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:10 PM
5

No, thank you. People with stories like these need to speak up, not just to let MRAs know what they are fighting for is something real, but to let people outside the movement know these problems exist and they need to be addressed.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:19 PM
1

In some cases that may be true, I believe the other term used is "Rape by Envelopment".
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:54 PM
4

Yes, he seems like such a soft spoken, kind person. It surprises me when they twist his words into aweful things he didn't say. "Please say your name before your question so I can answer you like a person, not an object."
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:40 PM
2

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:47 AM
2

Responsible Adult Figure with Blood Relations, Family Consent or otherwise Legal Custody Approved! ...To much?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:19 PM
2

Legal Guardian Approved!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:04 PM
12

I disagree, its still rape. The definition just needs to be less biased and include "Forced Penetration " or "Forced to Penetrate". No reason it should be a different crime.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:47 PM
1

As far as I know, Hulu has always been like that. Were all five links to Hulu?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:13 AM
3

Link?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:00 AM
2

I wasn't aware that subreddit existed, thats great for keeping information at hand. Thanks!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 10:58 PM
1

I agree people should not have to fear consensual sex, I also agree more men filing charges might have an effect of the laws in place. However isn't denying that someone else has to be eqaully responsible for their actions a problem? Same reasons its not harmless for people who can't say 'no'. Sure they are just being nice, but they are putting themselves in a position to be taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:30 PM
4

a huge pink monstrosity ^ That made me laugh. xD More serious now; I haven't had a reason to go to the toy section of a store in some time, relying on my memory I'd agree with you on that point. However, what about in application; Is it really considered a big deal when children play with toys intended for the other gender?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:26 PM
3

It's not different, we just know better. Thats sexist, against women. You're treating them like children who could never possess knowledge of the consequences of their actions or could never be held responsible for them.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:07 PM
17

Maybe its just because I grew up with two older sisters, but I didn't realize this was even noteworthy anymore. I remember playing with a plastic food/kitchen set, I also remember G. I. Joe went over to barbie's house when he wasn't kickin' the shit out of people. Conversely, my sisters play legos and green army men with me.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:29 PM
3

I feel really privileged to have nerve damage at the base of my neck, an abnormal curvature of my my spine, constant stiffness, and headaches that stem from that. Damn its good to be a man.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:18 PM
1

Because women don’t go around trying to peek over doors to see men naked, and even if they did, men would like it. Women are better than that, and we get uncomfortable with men around when we’re changing. I hate this statement. Sooo much... I have never tried to peek over a door see women naked. I would not like it if a women tried it on me. Appearently women are better then men. Also, we can't be made uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:58 PM
2

According to this a women cannot legally give consent if she is intoxicated, why should it be any different for men?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:53 PM
2

They banned... slouching? As in, its illegal to have bad posture? Please explain.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:19 PM
2

Admittedly, I have no idea why I enjoy the show. I certainly didn't think I would when I first watched it; it was just curiosity, "how could a show like this attract adult men?" Next thing I know I was looking for season 2. :P
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:36 AM
3

There is a TV show called My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. Originally intended for young girls it has sparked a surprising adult male following. We identify as "Bronies" Bro-Ponies. Some people seem to have a probelm with men watching the show as if we are homosexual or pedophiles or some shit. Its just a good show, I've enjoyed the time I spend watching it so I identify as a brony.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:51 AM
12

I can relate to you very much, i'm an 18-year-old white male who never even heard of the MRM until about 2 days ago. Though honestly I feel like I've been left with a resentment and distrust of all people, not just women. However I realize the few social issue i've had to deal with are nothing compared to the men who have been betrayed by the legal system. I'd consider that the MRM's first priority. (Even writing this I feel like, "Am I bitching to much?")
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:08 AM
2

I don't know anything about his post pattern, nor do I care to look it up so i'll surrender that point to you. In my experience returning negative behavior for negative behavior is unlikely to have a positive impact, specficially on the internet because he can easily rationalize why he doesn't have to care what you say.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:11 AM
4

I'm a brony, and I don't think there is anything wrong with that. Aren't we about breaking social and legal restrictions/stereotypes on men and their personalities?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:53 PM
5

C'mon now, don't be like that. His observation was valid. While I don't think we should ever shy from the truth, adding unnecessary insults will make outsiders see the MRM as a hate group. Why would we want that?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:47 PM
3

Eugenics? Thanks, nice to have a word for it now. I had to settle for putting "a bit like" in front of "genocide". :P
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:27 PM
6

I don't understand, why the negativity? I thought that was very well written, even if it was extremely artsy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:25 PM
3

While I have no psychological training to back this up, I'd have to agree. It may vary well be an instinct which was nessesary in a survivalist environment(which our instincts think we still live in) for the same reason male disposibility exists; if she is the limiting factor in reproduction she needs a reason to allow others to protect her.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:05 PM
-1

Well some of them, while often publically denouced(though other times accepted, O.o) say that the world would be safe if men were reduced to 1-10% of the human population. Which sounds a bit like genocide to me.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:52 PM
10

^ Yes, please do this. ^ I think being able to tackle an issue "softly" is one of the most valuable skills when trying to bring people into a unfamiliar viewpoint. If they bring up their shields you've already lost your chance.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:39 PM
3

We must have very different experiences; Its not uncommon for me to hear praise for a women striking a man. As for the flirting I always hear that "men only want sex anyway".
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:04 PM
10

"...it doesn’t matter if you are drunk or high as well. Your diminished abilities do not negate your responsibilities." Unless you're a women?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:51 PM
1

Only one is being placed in a negative spotlight. "Don't tell your daughters not to go out at night" is empowering because it says you shouldn't have to fear for them and they should be able to enjoy freedom(which is all true). However "teach your sons better" implies the blame for anything they originally had to fear can be placed on males.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:51 AM
0

Thank you for the reply. I've seen video footage(so these could simply be rare and extreme cases) of cops who stand by and allow a women to hit a man or beat him with an object(say, her high heels) and when he strikes back they tackle and arrest him. Makes me think there may be no theoretical difference in the law, but there could be a practical one.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:50 PM
2

Hear is a question I've had for a long time, and who better to ask then someone with legal training. If I were to hit or slap a women who insulted me I could easily have assault charges brought against me, even if I showed no signs of continuing the assault. Because while it is no long self-defense for her to react I have still commited assault. Correct? Is the reverse realistic for a man? Could he really expect assault charges against a women for striking him to be taken seriously? I have no le…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter