~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Right in the ovariesAssuming that claim is accurate then it's well explained by demographics. Wealth and power is obtained over a lifetime, and whites were almost 90% of the U.S. population through the 70's, until immigration and and birth rates put them around 60% today. So to treat this is some kind of bias is to complain there are too many old White people. I will be really surprised if Men in general don't fall below 50% of the top 1% in the next generation, given the preponderance of Women graduating higher ed… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 17/03/18 12:05 AM |
| 26 | Right in the ovariesWell how to do you slice it then? For the last eight years the most powerful man in the country was Black. And I would wager as a % of population, which is the only fair way to assign a race bias for the above positions, Indian and Jewish Americans far outweigh other races in achieving these in industry and government. The point is I think you and I both agree you can abuse statistics to confirm a bias, but the weight of the evidence shows White Men are no longer over represented in these positi… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/03/18 11:22 PM |
| 107 | Right in the ovariesDepending how you define the "top", this isn't even true. Average Asian income in the U.S. has been for a while much greater than Whites, with Indian Americans topping out at over 100K compared to 60K for all Whites. White's who emigrated from traditional orgins like Germany and England aren't even in the top 40 anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/03/18 10:55 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter