TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Confident-Cupcake164 Archive

View 4 posts and 163 comments by Confident-Cupcake164 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Money. When casual sex is legal, more handsome men get all the girls. When prostitution is legal, then men can also use money to get all the girls. Poor and ugly men will always be incel either way. But at least they are not taxed to support someone else's children
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:23 PM
3

Well kind of complex. Try to just pay women to give you children. Then someone would say that child support contract is not enforceable. So a woman pick poor guys, legal, rewarded with welfare. A woman choosing to get paid by rich men? Very legally complicated. Also, society holds men responsible for commitment way beyond what's being committed. Get married and a man will be responsible for alimony and child support for someone else's children. Not only the man never explicitly agreed to pay ali…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:22 PM
2

For having children? There are some problems of course. Looks most people are not monogamous if alternatives are legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:07 PM
4

As a sugar daddy, I can confirm. None of those sugar babies care they're not the only one
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:26 AM
7

And that's ladies and gentlemen, the real reason why most men and women opposes full free or commercialized sex. To ration money to ugly women and women to poor or ugly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:46 AM
8

Actually sex is easy if prostitution is legal. BOTH sides want to keep it illegal. Go figure. Why? So rich men don't hoard all the women? So a few pretty prostitutes don't hoard all the men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:44 AM
0

Women have very low freedom when it comes to picking partners. ​ If left to free market I bet most women will share richer smarter men. ​ However, that's precisely why sexual selection is not free market. Child support laws, for example, deter rich men from knocking up women. Rich men fearing $30k a month child support are reluctant to knock up poor women. Another issue is what you count as "abusive" may not matter too much. A rich sugar daddy that just pay women may be considered exploitative b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:26 AM
–

And those men won't owe anything if the deal is explicit. Not only the deal is implicit, the women themselves do not have any way to moderate the deal. Sample child support If the deal is explicit Al Pacino won't be paying $30k. There are plenty of smart beautiful women willing to get knocked up by him for less. Not only the deal is implicit. The women themselves cannot agree to say $5k before conception. Blue piller think about what women like and usually have things like love, romance, respect…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 01:31 PM
–

The thing is while no ones should owe anybody anything unless by explicit agreement there are many laws that put men at owing a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:53 AM
1

And women that want money aren't real?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 10:04 AM
1

Then go. Be your own man. Men pick women based on beauty anyway. We don't really care a woman is rich or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 10:04 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 10:03 AM
1

Okay. ​ Women make money like PEOPLE in general want money. Is that clear enough. Yes there is a point to be made. If women want money then paying them for sex is both ETHICAL and PRACTICAL and hence SHOULD BE LEGAL In other word, most things feminists say are bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 06:27 AM
-1

Yap. Precisely. Nothing wrong with women wanting money. What's wrong is people that for some reason think that the reality is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 10:34 AM
-1

Materialism is not superficial
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 10:17 AM
-1

And all those women that want to be her own man? They have less children if any. A woman can get a PhD but by the time she got it she's old and will have to settle for poorer guys and have fewer children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 10:15 AM
1

If you look at most successful marriage, oh wait, ALL marriage, all are monogamous. ​ Really? ​ Who the fuck care about marriage nowadays. Society want monogamy. That is why most successful marriage are monogamous. Also marriage is extremely costly when the guy is really rich. So many rich guys avoid marriage. Yes you won't mind huge age gap in successful marriage just like you won't find huge money gap. ​ Look at things NOT regulated. Look at sugar relationship. Age gap and money gap is huge. ​…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 01:33 PM
–

Bliblibli
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 11:28 AM
–

I show my cards. From the beginning I tell my sugar babies I want to build business dynasties. It's not even to impress them. I really want to build a business dynasty. It's the only thing worth building if you think about it. What is your life purpose? It's the non transactional relationship that have lots of hidden cards. How do you know she really likes you or not? She can pretend to be that way and divorce you latter. All cards are open on transactional relationship. She gives sex, I pay. Sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 11:24 AM
–

Are you in german? And why do religious values are opposed to prostitution? Why amount of child support should be linked to a man's wealth? Do we link amount I have to pay for burger, cars, or houses, with how wealthy I am? Rich man, poor man, pay the same money for the same houses, or burgers. Why for children the state decides the price? I think I would fuck high IQ pretty women than marrying anyone. I would love to knock up Mia Khalifa or any high IQ porn star if the total costs are reasonabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:38 PM
–

If she's ugly, I don't want her even if she's free If she's pretty with good IQ I don't want her to leave. If money is what she wants, I pay
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:35 PM
1

Women are blamed for not choosing rich financially responsible guys. That's partially correct. But the thing is, there are laws that get in the way of women choosing rich guys. Amount of child support is proportional to man's income. So rich guys fear being sued by child support. Many don't mind giving a good life if the child is really his or if things went south, he only pays some amount he explicitly agree to. But no. The states decide amount of child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:31 PM
1

I am one of those men. I am legally single. I have 2 sugar babies producing babies for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:28 PM
1

Why be a single mom? Before getting knocked up get a deal saying the father will have to pay some money.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:28 PM
1

But there is an easy solution for that. Pick rich smart men, ask explicitly for money,. Tada...... ​ More children more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:26 PM
1

If something is necessary for society as a whole it would benefit somebody. If too few people want to do it for free, then someone that benefit from it will just pay. Just let rich smart men pay women to give them heirs. Problems solved. If salary is higher than salary working for office + the child are loaded, many women will choose to be paid to produce children than working in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:26 PM
–

What about if a woman want rich smart children herself and realize that the easiest way for her to get rich smart children is to get a very rich smart man that just pay her. If the man doesn't pay then it's harder because he has to work. But the man pays. She doesn't have to work. So that's pretty easy. Shouldn't women be able to choose just that? Many men wants to have many children cost effectively. And they don't mind rising the children. The way child support works is the money don't go to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 04:06 PM
–

I actually like long term relationship. I just don't think commitments are the way to do it. Splitting the transactions into smaller pieces is the better way. While we don't really commit to one another, not legally at least, it's more stable. I am not interested in fucking as many women as I can. I actually regret having sex with some low quality women and I am happy I didn't knock them up. That being said, the idea that many men wants to have sex with many women is justified by evolutionary ps…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:49 PM
–

I have 3 children. Maybe 4 is coming. Another pretty smart sugar baby with good IQ wants to join. So maybe another 4 from that one. Yes they are much prettier than "mediocre" women and obviously smarter. Money makes it easy for me to aim high. And no, I do not think they can get guys richer and smarter than I am. Not if they insist on marriage. If they can, they won't choose me. If most men don't want that and most women don't want that, why government insist on prohibiting it? Why guys like Al …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:43 PM
–

Surely it'll be easy to point out one then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:41 PM
–

And why you think that? Say I am smart and I won lots of math competitions. Say I am a financially responsible father. But I don't want to get married. How do I make women trust me that I will financially support our children? What makes you think guys offering money have nothing else to offer? Al Pacino is forced to pay $30k a month child support. Does he has nothing else to offer to women? Imagine if instead of being forced to pay $30k a month child support, Al Pacino, says, give me heirs and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:39 PM
–

I did look up. What is you're trying to say anyway? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_United_States this doesn't say when it's illegal and the bullshit used to justify it. Even when prostitution is legal, it is often more convenient to pretend that it's not prostitution. To avoid prostitution tax for example. If I pay my girlfriend that's commerce and she has to pay income tax on top of it. If I just financially support my girlfriend then none of us pay taxes on it. For example, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:30 AM
–

In China prostitution is illegal when communists take over. In US, I don't know. Why it's illegal is debatable. But I think the real reason is because women love getting paid and so many men will not have a wife and so many ugly women will not get even lunch if rich men can just pay women for sex and having children explicitly. Transactional sex is prohibited because it's so good. If it were legal and can be discussed openly, most sex will be explicitly transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:22 AM
–

Falling in love makes you stupid and get less cost ineffective women. Never again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:16 AM
–

In south east asia I used sugar relationship. In US, I don't know. But I think sugar relationship is less problematic than marriage. It's still shitty because she can just leave you and sue for child support. But it's still less shitty than marriage. In south east asia, sugar relationship is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:16 AM
–

Briffault's law applies to humans On top can mean many things. For peacocks it usually means more elaborate tails. For men it depends on society. When allowed, men with power and money get more women. Just look at gengish khan. In ancient china, rich men without power also get more women. Rich men have concubines. Even in western civilization, Tiger Wood have mistresses. But in western civilization there are laws that punish men from having many children while rich. Al Capone, for example, have …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:14 AM
–

I combine economy, evolutionary psychology, and game theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:11 AM
–

Society. Feminists White knights. Basically, humans are bigots and will tend to prohibit things that make OTHER HUMANS happy. So if they prohibit something it's NEVER for your own good. It's definitely the good options.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:11 AM
–

Do you have other better explanation why women like rich guys? Also I like women that like money. I avoid women that like religion, sanctity, or other nonsense. I like rational women. Do you observe that more beautiful women end up with richer guys? I think the most obvious blatant proof that women love being paid is that being paid is illegal. You don't ban something because no people want it. You ban something because too many people want it. You don't ban Americans from hiring mexicans becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:10 AM
–

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/464439-far-from-being-laws-to-protect-women-antipolygamy-statutes-may That's a source. Other sources are selfish genes by richard dawkins. Other things society do is to prevent rich men from bequeathing money to his own children. It's also discussed in red queen book by Matt Ridley. So the money goes to the state or church instead. I am sorry I do not explain why I do not like religion so much. Religions speak positively about marriage and I avoid anything that s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:08 AM
–

Any of those stereotypes are false?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:04 AM
–

Fair enough. But if someone can attract women by offering marriage, and other can attract women by good look, why using money is discriminated against? I got a theory. Because it works too well. It like women are prohibited from selling sex. Why? Because that's exactly what men want. Have sex with smart beautiful women. And for rich men, paying is simply far cheaper than marrying. Sex will never be free for rich europeans. Nor do I want that to be free. Your children are your heir. Do you want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:04 AM
–

I avoid under 18 women. They're dangerous. I mean having many children and not risking core of my wealth and income. I don't want judges to even see or know how much money I earn. Can you do that in US?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:00 AM
–

Transactional explicit relationship is the most consensual relationship there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 10:59 AM
–

That means I explicitly pay women to give me children and I explicitly told them that I will only financially support children that are biologically mine. Our relationship is mainly transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 10:58 AM
–

I can do that. What do I miss?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 10:58 AM
1

That's why men got to pay. So easy in south east asia. Too problematic in western world. At price points 0, then a woman in top 60 percentile can aim at a man at 95 percentile. If you are richer than 10% of people in your country, would you settle for a woman in top 60 percentile only? No. You want women in top 80% at least and you may want to have a few. So? Offer money.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 10:57 AM
1

Just pay women to have your children. Very easy in south east asia. Win win. Sure there are many reasons for women not to have children. There are many reasons why men don't want to work too. They just need incentives.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 10:41 AM
0

Marriage is more idiot now. Before paternity tests there aren't easy way to know who your children is. There has to be at least some sort of deals where the woman agree not to have sex with any other guys. In exchange, the children of such women are heirs. In ancient time, it's a reasonable deal. Now we can just do paternity tests and contract. Governments just avoid it. Anyway, the post is awaiting moderator aproval. Not sure why.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:11 AM
0

Marriage is worthless true. It's not just worthless. It's idiot. It's like entering concentration camp. Monogamy is not dead. Monogamy is never a natural thing. In all sex where government doesn't regulate, some men get most the women. Men either have many sex partners or none. When you can't pay for sex, then super handsome men get all the women. When you can pay, then the rich get lots of women by just paying. Just look at tinder and sugar relationship. It's not monogamous at all. So far, this…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:01 AM
0

Make things transactional
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 11:09 AM
2

I wonder if I am a red piller. I am more of transactional piller. I don't really care how much a woman like me. It's reflected in her price anyway. I care how pretty she is, how high her IQ is, how thin and young she is, and then how much she asks. I really don't mind paying. It'll cost money to raise children. An extra 10 % to get smarter more beautiful women to mother my children is worth it. I DO mind paying child support or alimony because that gives women incentives to leave me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 09:46 AM
1

Video chat first. Make sure she is at least pretty. Offer money for IQ tests. If she sells nude or nude video chat, buy That will filter out lots of women. No I don't split bills. I am a sugar daddy and I am aware that the women are much poorer than I am. That being said, don't order things too expensive either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 08:56 AM
1

Nah. I just approach sugar babies. Usually I start with simple trade. IQ tests for money. Or video chat.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 08:35 AM
1

I just hire sugar babies. Women are almost always interested in money. Once you fuck her a few times, don't worry too much about how to make her like you. Chance is you're bored and she's the one sticking. Paying is so cheap. Of course, once I realized that, I got extremely picky and pick only the smartest most beautiful one I can pay. Now I am a father of 3 smart beautiful children with another smart pretty sugar baby on the pipe line.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 07:40 AM
2

Nope. ​ But I want the best of the best and I WA over 500 women. No way I am going waste mere $50 for lunch each. Not pretty, not smart, not thin, not young, out. Not cost effective I may bargain. Out
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 02:38 PM
2

Nice. Do I get rewarded Yes. That means it's not nice. It's just being selfish No. That means being nice is stupid. So stop being nice. That sums it all. Be fair and transactional. Be good to people that are good to you. Be nice to people that are nice to you. Be useless to useless people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 11:01 AM
1

She can no longer get rich smart sugar daddies. Sure there is is marriage market. But then she got relatively poorer dumber men and heavily infested by government regulation. I don't look for sugar babies over 24. How many children I can get out of her? Not cost effective. One 30+ years old beautiful sugar baby told me she's interested in a white guy that treat her like trash. Then she left us both. I was like, wow. Fortunately, I made things transactional. All this time I didn't spend a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:48 AM
-3

Not if the men offer money. In my country prostitute is free and I can easily fuck very beautiful women if I am willing to spend $100. Do I? I earn more than $100 in a few hours. But I don't want STD, I want relationship, I already have a consort, I want high IQ children and I got a few, so no. But if I want to I can. Under no circumstances I would fuck an ugly woman. Oh actually I did once. Did it go that far? Ewww.... I was an idiot. She's so fat. I am happy she's not pregnant. I didn't even r…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:44 AM
–

N count doesn't matter to all men. I've heard Mia Khalifah have good IQ right? I would be thrilled to fuck her and have children with her. If we can all stop doing that and actually allow women the same type of sexual life so many men feel is their birthright, this problem would be instantly resolved. I don't think this is the main women's problem. If women enjoy sex too, great. Do whatever they want. If anything in that area we have women having too much freedom already. What about if she got p…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:38 AM
0

I would disagree. Reasonable materialistic is okay
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:15 AM
7

Argghhhh.... Just ask for money already. Aren't you tired of games?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:14 AM
5

So what if it's not all? Do all people have to be hackers so you guard your password carefully?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:13 AM
1

Correct. Whoever she dates, must be even richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:13 AM
-1

Yap. Pay a few that are best. Men aim for quantity more than quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:12 AM
5

But why don't they just honestly ask for resources or money? Ah.... because so many absurd laws get in the way of honesty
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:12 AM
1

BINGO
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:11 AM
-1

This is why I believe all sex should be transactional. Oh she is one of those women that are disgusted for being paid for sex but think men has to pay child support proportional to income and somehow the state should decide the pricing model. Oh, she thinks being paid for sex is so disgusting for HER so it should be illegal for OTHER women. Let me guess? Feminist? There is one way to avoid their kind. Offer money, ask for either sex or handjob. I'd rather get charged with soliciting prostitution…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 10:10 AM
–

Yes. Men would date beautiful women. Women want money. You miss that. ​ Not all dating is escort, but if prostitution is legal, I don't see how any bullshit strategy can survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 09:19 AM
–

Nothing. Honesty is punished. Being a manipulative liar is rewarded. That's how dating works when governments decide what absurd pricing mechanism people should have. Most of the time, women want money and men want sex. If this can be discussed openly and legal, that's what most honest connection will be. Women selling sex. But no. So everybody lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 09:18 AM
–

If someone else can have sex with the woman outside marriage, why should I? I wouldn't marry or commit to women. I'll keep things transactional. Do I want a virgin? Not so much. There are guys willing to pay $100k, to $1 million for it. I am not one of those guys. I am interested with women I can knock up and give me children. And yea, I got money. But seriously. Marriage is so absurd for atheist libertarians unromantic guys like me. So no. No one deserves commitment. Virgin none virgin alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 09:17 AM
–

Yes. But what about if men are offering money? Would you reward us with your body? Some pretty women would. And that's all the women I care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 09:13 AM
–

Both Realistically, men want pretty young women that's not too problematic. Women want money. But the idea is so politically incorrect most people don't even think that way. Hei, I didn't. I ended up settling for low quality women and try to make them like me and it costs far more and ended up getting me scammed. When I realized women want money, I was like, wow. It's so simple. I can aim for really smart and beautiful one and don't bother dating the rest. I knocked up one already. Another on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 09:10 AM
1

Most men aren't super wealthy. So? Normally, most men don't have a wife. I understand that in western civilization you got this monogamy norms. So a man no matter how poor, ugly, or dumb, have a pretty decent chance to have a wife. But that is not natural. In marriage where government insist that people have to be monogamous or in normal dating where government insist that money can't be used as bargaining chips, then yes, people are monogamous. But that's not a matter of preferences. That's jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 07:39 AM
1

Well more like I just don't want to waste time and money on useless people, including useless women. She doesn't want to have sex with me? Fine. But I hate wasting time and money doing lunch and so on and so on. Unless she's very pretty and smart, then she deserves a lunch and I'll just bid over there. She disagree, I am out. Power play? Look... What do women do to poor ugly guys? Same thing right? It's just normal capitalism. The one doing power play is those feminists that for some reason insi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 07:20 AM
1

You need anti paywall add on to read it for free. I don't know a good anti paywall add on. ​ Just look for Jeffrey Younger and Israel Adesanya ​ I think I verified that it's quite true. I asked my friends in Australia. You can't even agree before hand. You have a girlfriend, poof, the girls can leave you and get a lot of money. No prenup can get you out of that situation. Absurd. The woman themselves cannot agree on a reasonable deal. The woman can't agree, okay you're so rich anyway, if I leave…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 04:07 PM
2

Sorry wrong link. I was remembering a case where someone suicide himself for failing to pay $16k child support and alimony. I couldn't find that link. ​ Okay I stand corrected. ​ Yea $11k total is small. The mom should have picked someone richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:56 PM
3

Women wanting to marry up and for money or even asking for money is perfectly fine. There is nothing wrong. In fact, I think all women should. That's how you get richer smarter more beautiful children. Aim high. Women have to get pregnant for months. You don't have sperms to squander. What's shitty is not what women want. What's shitty in US and many western countries are the law. Why people become passport bros? Just look at this https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/04/father-suicide-de…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:45 PM
0

Child support laws are not meant for the child. I can't believe so many liberal repeat the same absurdities. I asked around. Can they make agreement that the child support money goes to a trust fund to be given to the child. The answer is no. It's always to the mother that she is free to squander for anything she want. If it's for the child, why should it be proportional to the man's income? Why the money goes to the mother and not the child? The child will of course be better off if the rich fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:39 PM
1

Interesting. Are most women like that? Actually, I like to avoid women like you. Paying for sex is a great way to figure out which women are not like you. No offense. To each his/her own I guess. My marriage costed me a lot of money because my ex wife "loved" me and want to stay married. I ended up losing a lot of money to lawyer. I prefer to just pay her because marriage is so stupid it'll end up wasting money for lawyer for nothing anyway. But she can't understand. Since then I am disgusted wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:23 PM
1

Interesting. Is that what you truly feel? The reason I ask is because rich men tend to pay anyway. I would rather pay women cash than getting sued for alimony or child support So it's kind of absurd to me that the sex it self should be free given that giving me heirs will cost me money. I am not interested in free girls. I am interested in smart beautiful young thin women. Paying or free means very little difference with me. It makes transactions quicker. My time is expensive. I don't have time …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:58 PM
0

That's a reasonable opinion you have. But as a woman, have you thought of wanting richer smarter children? You know, like having Elon as father of your children? I am curious my self. My understanding is sugar babies are usually not desperate. They just prefer the rich. Well, the one that chose me is a bit on desperate side but I offer fair deals and our children are smart and beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:51 PM
-1

Anyway, check this out https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/464439-far-from-being-laws-to-protect-women-antipolygamy-statutes-may It's never to protect the consenting women. It's to protect envious women that want to get paid well too for being sex objects and poor men that can't compete with richer men But say you don't trust the link I wrote above. Why not let the woman decide? Abuse what? Many women prefer the rich. They don't mind sharing. Most women obviously like money. Who doesn't? Do we ask …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:16 PM
1

I am a south east asian. I sometimes wonder why americans are pissed when I said I paid women to be mother of my children? I was like, what the fuck did I do wrong? Americans think that commercialization of sex is so wrong and I have no idea why. I think everything should be commercialized. Sex, organs, food, healthcare. It's the only thing that's consistent with freedom and capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 01:03 PM
1

prohibition of prostitution child support laws making having children expensive for rich men. Not just women. Poor men support such laws too. It's from evolutionary psychology https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/464439-far-from-being-laws-to-protect-women-antipolygamy-statutes-may Think about it. If prostitution is legal, why would any men want to marry or date an ugly women? It's pussy cartel. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/a41ed7/would_would_happen_if_women_collectively/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:54 PM
2

More like some people need save don't backstab me this got to be win win or gtfo mode. Do you want rape accusation 30 years down the road? Go ahead. Do you want to go to jail for $16k child support a month? Go ahead date western women. Do you want to manage your risk while getting smart pretty woman, go to south east asia. Western women aren't bad. They're very beautiful. Their laws against consensual sex is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:42 PM
-1

What is wrong with power play? If she consent then consent means consent. If she says yes, be it for money or because she wants smart children, both are things rich smart men can provide far more than the poor, so what? Many ugly women are bitter that pretty women can have easy life so they think it's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:41 PM
-1

Because they can vote and make laws that pressure men to pick those awful women. If a few women can just sell sex, you can say good bye to marriage and ugly women will not get a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:18 PM
0

The women they can get in America are fat and ugly and monsters. With their money, the woman they can get in SEA is better. South east asian women are more "cost effective"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:17 PM
1

And that is perfectly fine. If some women want men that make $100k per year, that is perfectly fine. Does she wants monogamy on top of that? What about if she wants marriage? Is she pretty enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:16 PM
1

And most rich man don't mind providing. They're interested in younger smarter beautiful thin women, not women that can make money on her own. How much money a woman can bring to the table means little for a rich man. I wouldn't date Queen Elizabeth. I would date a cashier lady that's pretty. Hell, I would rather date a pretty prostitutes than a strong independent woman. In western worlds there are laws where poor women are somehow expensive. She can complain that sex is not consensual 30 years l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:15 PM
-1

What is wrong with sex tourism? Why some women have problem with sex tourism or commercialized sex? Think about it. If two consenting adult agree, why some people have some problems? Because somehow when a rich man is happy, leftists got triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:12 PM
0

That's what I expect. Men aim for quantity. Women aim for quality. So I would expect that some men get all the chicks. The men are willing to aim for lower level women. The women would rather share such men than be the only one for low level women. The catch is which men is in the top 5%? If men can pay women for sex then the richest men will be on top 5%. If men can't pay then some welfare recipient maybe on top 5% and we're doomed by taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:52 PM
1

I disagree with both republican and liberal here. Women are cunning rational that can look for their own choices. Both liberal and conservatives say that women can't truly consent to prostitution. That's conservative. Nope. I'll have relationship with a whore. Transactional relationship. If she's pretty with good IQ, I'll knock her up. Just make sure the deal is clear. Like how much she got paid per children and that the child has to pass paternity tests. Perhaps doing this in US is difficult? W…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 11:34 AM
2

How to get a sugar baby? Just offer money. If prostitution is legal that's easy. I as of now, don't believe in love anymore. I don't think true love (without incentive, outside transaction) exist by much. And when they do they're annoying. Like women get possessive wanting to be the only one, wanting attention, wanting me to be slave of other entities. ​ Rather than putting up with all those absurdity, I'd rather pay. I want sex, I pay. The woman smart and pretty enough for breeding material, I …
/r/MensRights22/08/23 10:41 AM
7

Not dating shitty women is like doing biz only with honest men. I did that and got scammed a lot. Now I don't care if a person is scammy or not. If they can't scam me they can't. Period.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:33 AM
1

If you're rich and don't need a job, Indonesia is awesome. Lots of cost effective sugar babies you can just pay to give you children. ​ The catch is how do you convince them that you'll take care the kids?
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:27 AM
4

It's like women prefer money and men prefer beauty and young age. It's just the way it is. No double standard at all. We just have different preferences.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:17 AM
1

Promiscuity does make men more marketable. Helps you understand women a lot. Experience are useful. Also if you have a woman, other women will like you more.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:16 AM
1

Indonesia
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:53 AM
1

I did that and I am very happy. Only works in Indonesia though. You can call me immoral. But so many men just cum and dump knock up and leave. I offer money, I don't offer my balls on silver plate. Win win.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:31 AM
1

In US, you can't do that I think. There is no oversight whatsoever. The woman will just not show any receipt and there is nothing the man can do. The mom can use it for vacation and there is nothing the father could have done. The mom could have been a very bad mom and judges would give the child to the mom anyway. Which is why it's important to think about it BEFORE you fuck someone. Talk about it to potential mother of your children.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:01 AM
1

PRECISELY Also the most consensual things are things EXPLICITLY AGREED upon. If I am going to be forced to pay child support I want to at least talk the amount. Also it would be great if the couple can DECIDE the amount rather than counting on state laws. The state is like a stupid pimp that make women expensive for the rich.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:00 AM
1

Yes. I see absolutely nothing wrong with that. Better than offering marriage.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 09:59 AM
1

Why is it sick? What's the other solution? Women definitely want money. She wants to know worse come to worse she get something. In Indonesia, I market that as downpayment to show I am serious. My intent is of course to be good father for my children. So we don't really go through that detail and we still live together after 4 years. She's a bit possessive and I want more sugar babies.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 09:59 AM
1

In my country, that's how I do it. But it's not even relevant because I live together with my children and their mom.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 09:58 AM
1

5 upvotes? In men's right forum? Anyway the stats I put maybe misleading. Most american men approve cohabitation is just as good as marriage. Not sure how many approve cohabitation with a few woman but it's legal. So I may be wrong. Perhaps feminism is just far more painful than polygamy
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:46 PM
5

Estimate. But basically anti polygamy laws are really done to protect "men" from competition with richer men that can easily just hoard women. I read that in red queen by Matt Ridley. Basically if sex is transactional then men with money will simply have power. Don't get the girl, then I don't pay either. Very simple. Here is some stats. Approval is 20% https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/313112/understanding-increase-moral-acceptability-polygamy.aspx I am not sure what is the approv…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 10:35 AM
3

Because people encourage backstabbing. When a relationship is good, other relationship will not be chosen. So to turn all relationship into shit the people encourage backstabing. Boundary as in transactional relationship makes relationship good. you do this for me I do this for you. It's clear. So illegal. Marriage also have laws like alimony.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:27 AM
3

Even if other men fuck other men that doesn't mean life is not, given that choice, easier for women. Actually most white knights are also men. Most people that support blue pillers are also men. Feminists and most men both hate polygamy and prostitution. It's not about men vs women. It's about freedom vs statists. It's about getting rid competition and wanting to be the best competitor.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:24 AM
1

Just pay for it. Then be a sugar daddy
/r/MensRights11/06/23 01:51 PM
1

By the way I check that trp.red ​ Meanwhile I can't post anything in this subreddit too. I asked mod and no feedback. I am making a post about knocking women up outside marriage and have heirs outside marriage, which I think will be very useful for people
/r/TheRedPill25/05/23 09:48 AM
2

Define healthy? If your target is to have rich smart children there are far more important factors to consider. Your IQ. Your partners' IQ. How well you teach them business. Whether you pay the mom or marry them has very little effect.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/23 01:19 PM
5

So? I am far richer than them and they can get pregnant with my children. Something I don't want to do my self. Just pay.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/23 12:53 PM
2

I am a sugar daddy. I think the best way to have children is the same way as the best way to have sex. Pay women for it. Pay good money. Only 20% more than the total cost of raising children. Have clear contracts. Can that be done in western world? Who knows. For example, if you knock up many women, amount of child support per child will drop I think. So if the woman knows your income and you keep knocking up women then you just pay child support.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/23 11:51 AM
8

I am a sugar daddy. Some women chose me. If they chose to have a boyfriend they get someone poorer. I offered money. They chose me. What's wrong with that. Yes legal age. One is 20 another is 25.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:02 PM
3

Pay mistresses to have children. NEVER marry. In the west you need to work around much more. I am still trying to figure out how. But in my country, I would never get married.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:32 AM
0

just pay. If she gives you 4-5 children then take care of her for life. You will need her to take care of children. But don't get married.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:30 AM
2

Paying for pussy is the best way to get pussies. Including if you want to have children. Paying is so much better than marrying.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/23 09:28 AM
1

What does it mean by programming catered to them? New code? Someone has to create an actual new computer program?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:21 AM
1

I think the far worse accusation is the idea that those who pay for sex are rapists. Boy In most sex, and transactional sex is already a good way to reduce it, women are scammy. And there is no way in hell a smart beautiful woman do not have other choices. If anything they can just choose other sugar daddies. It's actually a bit more difficult to encourage women to be mistress than just fucking. But people make that sort of accusations and turn that into laws. What about women that are ugly? Now…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:01 AM
7

What exactly do they want
/r/MensRights18/04/23 11:25 AM
3

I was accused of being a pedophile for liking an 19 years old sugar baby. She tried to scam me. Actually if we're not experienced or if I do not have mentors women follow certain pattern. They always try to scam first. This is their way to test if we're an idiot incel If we're balanced and firm and pretty much unscamable we filter out lots of garbage and get laid. Fuck them enough, and it's easy to persuade someone smart and pretty that we want something more serious. I learned later that all se…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 11:23 AM
3

I am sick of misleading naratives
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:01 PM
2

Sometimes I am happy that I am not the only one thinking this is nuts.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:03 PM
1

Totally agreed. By why would twitter before Elon keep hiring those welfare workers?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/23 08:29 AM
3

Stay away from low IQ women. Only fuck those worthy to knock up. Skin color means little but test for IQ before fucking. Some skin color correlate with low IQ. So beware.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/23 07:59 AM
2

Western modern marriage is the dumbest marriage I have ever seen. Seriously. The Muslims have contract marriage. Sugar relationship is legal. Child support can be reduced by having many children. ​ How the fuck people still get married.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:25 AM
2

Finally, a solution for all of our oppressions. You don't have to cut of your cock right? Why not make everyone do it?
/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:46 AM
2

I got scammed if I don't share.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:03 AM
1

I don't mind sharing women with my bro
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:40 PM
1

All these misogynists MRA must be forced to self identify as women for a while and compete against women in extreme sports like MMA. Then they will know how tough it must have been for women. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9983177/Outrage-transgender-MMA-fighter-defeats-French-woman.html Currently, there is discrimination against CIS men that want to compete that way. Not sure why. We're not leftist enough or what?
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:14 AM
3

Sex is commodity.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 11:08 AM
1

Depends. In my country, money makes things extremely easy. Prostitution is legal. There is no feminists. Most women and men are poor. That means women cannot make money other way, they can't marry rich men either because most men are poor. So? If you're rich? In my country? Offer money, bam. Very easy it's boring. What I am trying to do is to find a beautiful young woman that's also smart to have children with. I have one, but that one is so possessive she is scared of another sugar baby.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/23 06:31 AM
3

Don't get married
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:10 AM
3

Feminists have very different ideas of rape than normal people. Offering money is rape Threatening to leave is rape Actually, feminists want to prevent women from pleasing men. The real reason why prostitution is illegal is because some men are pleased.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:05 AM
2

This one is nothing to complain about. I think prostitution should be made legal.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:54 PM
4

Can we have clones of ourselves?
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:18 PM
2

It is what it is :)
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:10 AM
1

This guy is Chad I start doubting that what he does is non consensual. I mean the girl like him and would do many thing for him and get paid for it. Looks like the woman choose to be with him.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:36 AM
1

They're married? No men should get married. Without marriage, just pay child support and move on. Once you have many other children the child support amount can be reasonable actually.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:34 AM
1

Surprisingly the muslim countries don't hate women. But they're not democracy. I start being grateful living among muslims in my country. Just stay away from talking too much about their religion and you'll do fine.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:33 AM
3

I am kind of a CEO my self :)
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:31 AM
3

They want sexism?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:30 AM
2

The whole point of marriage is ensuring your child is yours. Think about it. So all these sanctity religion and so on and so on are just for effectively paternity tests? yes and no. YES. In a sense that once paternity test show up marriage is useless and obsolette. NO. In a sense that when marriage is created, we don't have paternity tests. What about love? Legitimacy? Romance? Respect for women? So on and so on? All those are unimportant smoke and mirror. Marriage also has other purpose. Bankru…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:25 AM
1

Why do most women think that being sexist as man is okay?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:23 AM
5

Saying you're racist for supporting men's right is sexist. ​ But that's not even the whole issue. It's the woke crowd that's both sexist and racist. They just call it "reverse" sexism or racism. And then people that want normal color blind society that don't look at race is the one they called sexist and racist for not "recognizing" their smoke and mirrors.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:22 AM
1

I think she exploits men, but hell, that looks pretty consensual to me. All sex are transactional. Would you marry a woman that says she doesn't want to have sex with you? Would she give you children if you say you're broke and won't pay? Very unlikely. But people says that it's not transaction. The proof is women can just leave men grab a lot of money and force the men to pay for children that's not his. Well... It simply shows that marriage is a VERY BAD way to do transaction. There is no way …
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:48 PM
1

I don't know much about him. But many things he said is true. I asked a feminist, how to get women? By consent right. There are 2 ways to get consent from women. Seduce, pay. He can do both. If those 2 are illegal, how else are we going to get women? And then the women mumble about being respectful and so on. Then I thought. I should have corrected my self. How else are we going to get pretty women that's not feminist.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:45 PM
1

He did?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:26 PM
6

You mean those ISIS bastard don't want to do it themselves? The women are ugly or what?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:23 PM
3

I wonder in which area of the world the laws are like this? India seems a bit extreme.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:21 PM
4

In other word, anyone getting married is an idiot?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:19 PM
3

Don't get married. Don't even think. I live happily with a mistress and our biggest fight is she wants to be the only one.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:17 PM
-2

Which feminists? Libertarian feminists? No. Radical feminists? Of course they're happy. They want to throw as many wrench as possible on anything mutually beneficial between men and women.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:16 PM
4

Second fucking that.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:16 PM
2

What about if you're not married? Can you be accused of being a parent?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:15 PM
2

Law and society is fucked up for men. The only thing that hurt pretty women are laws against consensual sex. For some reason, feminists think if some pretty women earn 10 times normal salary doing sex work that means she is exploited.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:15 PM
3

Hopefully men don't get married at all. Have children outside marriage, and do paternity tests, then pay childsupport for your own children.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:14 PM
-1

Marriage laws are different than trade laws. Both are disappointing. But marriage laws is pretty much an abomination.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:13 PM
7

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:12 PM
3

This is why you don't get married.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:12 PM
6

It's just reality. Imagine if in Andrew Tate case the gender is reversed. There are so many women deceiving men to get money. And it's okay. But if men don't even commit fraud, suddenly men's are guilty.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter