TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Confident_Trash8517 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by Confident_Trash8517 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

no, YOU don't respond. this is a MEN'S rights sub, not a feminism one where we want to hear women making up fake oppression claims about how men demand they get circumcised too THAT SHIT DOESN'T HAPPEN. PERIOD. not with them actually expecting you to do it and not just a dumb insult. if you can't admit it, leave.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:27 PM
1

thx, part of your username checks out too - oh aren't we both so clever ? i'm not reading all that bs got to your 3rd sentence and you already admitted i'm right - ONE - man in your ENTIRE life EVER told you to cut your beef curtains. and doesn't look like you went into detail about how bc you probably know i'm right AGAIN - and like i guessed it was obviously only when he was trying to be a dick and insult you, not that he ACTUALLY expected you to circumcise yourself like MANY american women do…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:10 PM
2

maybe we should simplify the entire intact position down to this it's perfect in so many ways : it's short it shows the blatant unremorsefully hypocrisy of feminists - this drives a chasm between casual uneducated feminists who just got indoctrinated and the hardcore man hating feminists who will be forced to expose themselves that they only believe in women's body's women's choice, not men's, which will turn away the indoctrinated. it steals from feminists and uses it against them it avoids nee…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 05:59 PM
0

no. i don't believe you. maybe ONE guy in your ENTIRE LIFE ever said that to you and i bet a million dollars he tried to say it nicely or awkwardly. either that or he was being a dick when you were in a fight or breakup. bc 90% of men are just happy to get laid and barely care about the asthetics of the vagina. they're not gonna say "you should cut your beef curtains bitch" and never get sex from you again. so stop making things up to steal tears and pretend both genders have it hard. no. this i…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 04:35 PM
2

not even a requirement in my experience the "dumb " one's don't even know you're intact unless you tell them. I've dated and slept with girls who after we had already slept together, it would come up with others or in conversation and they said they would never get with an intact guy 😂 like they either don't or barely even know the difference unless you show them yours next to labeled pictures of mutilated cut ones. some of them I've told, some of them I've just sat back and laughed
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:56 PM
1

you think "male feminists" are actually getting pussy let alone making women orgasm? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:12 PM
1

why do you care that i care what he calls himself?? see i can avoid answering the question like a coward just like him and you
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:31 PM
5

then why don't you call yourself simply pro women's rights ? or an egalitarian ? or nothing at all? why do you feel the need to call yourself a feminist specifically
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:53 PM
5

no fuckin doubt. it's insidious. i agree too, it would be hilarious if it wasn't causing such serious society wide problems. i really don't know what it will take to knock sense into people besides a major war unfortunately. i wish there was a way to get people back to their senses without war but the theory I've heard is that wars every other generation or so on average are what reset it the cultural norms. there's never any feminists in wartime, then they don't want the equality of the trenche…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:57 PM
2

it takes a spineless person to not be able to admit they're wrong but it takes an even more pathetic jelly spined person to admit they're wrong ("selective service is still a draft" --- "I'm not talking about selective service obviously that's wrong") and THEN backtrack and try to pretend they didn't just admit they were proven wrong a moment ago once they realize it made them lose the broader argument. there's no point in debating "men" like that I'm not surprised in the least that someone like…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:48 PM
3

feminists : men in the patriarchy cause all wars waaaa fact: women are majority leaders of the current wars men's rights: it's fucked up that women can't be drafted bc of sexism but can now still send men to die on their behalf you: the men who protect me in this country deserve to die bc there's no draft, they volunteered to die waaaa me: there is still a draft and the moment there's not enough volunteers there will be a draft you: ok there's still a draft so i have no point, but i still hate t…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:12 PM
3

you're right, it's 2023 and the draft - now called """selective service""" still requires ONLY MEN to register for it or face penalties anywhere from lack of Pell grants, to fines to EXECUTION in times of war. look it up, that's reality. just bc the U.S happens to not be in a large enough war at the moment to need a draft doesn't mean it couldn't happen in literally 5 minutes from now. so what was your moronic point about 1941 ? were you trying to mistakenly pretend there's been some actual prog…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:57 PM
3

what sins of men of the past? you mean protecting and providing for women since the dawn of time ? or you mean privileging women with chivalry letting them literally walk all over men? i agree now it's clear those things were sins with hindsight 20/20, but not in the way that dumbass professor was thinking. i know you're making a point but don't fall into the trap of accepting their false premise. , the patriarchy in the sense feminists describe it is a complete myth. men are and always have bee…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:30 PM
6

the issue with that is women have always been a part of that exact same high class and most of the time they STILL get more privileges there. the fact that we pretend like they didn't want to be there and are just victims of these terrible sociopathic men instead of being just as terrible and sociopathic themselves for marrying them shows even MORE privilege that they get a fall guy to take all the heat and arrows for them and just get to quietly sit back and enjoy living godlike existences with…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:56 PM
1

i guess you rly didn't read the parent comment or my original comment.. you literally just saw the end of the statement about conservatives having more balls about religion and your puny little neoliberal brain dropped down to programed tribal mode and went full triggered you should go back to your safe space little snowflake lady boy, the men are talking about the real world here. byeeee
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:45 AM
1

you are highly religious, look at you out here evangelizing for your cause against the nonbeliever conservatives just like a Christian would do. you're just too stupid to realize that you're in what's become a culty pseudo-religious political movement you know exactly what I'm referring to, you're just calling the observation that plenty of others have understood and agreed with from Upvotes and comments "buzzwords" bc you don't have the intelligence to directly debate my observation that neolib…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:16 AM
1

religion is a buzzword ?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:56 AM
26

this sums up why a ridiculous delusion like feminism can survive at all any theories on what would/could ever change that ?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:53 AM
7

he said "at least will pretend to care" that's different than "all pretend to care" he's saying you'd be hard pressed to find a man who won't AT THE LEAST pretend to care about women's issues and most men do care about them but women won't even pretend to care about men's issues, they'll at best just change the subject and at worst call you fragile incel and get insulted that you dare to bring up men's issues when they think they have it worse
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:52 AM
1

you : waaa , conservatives are hypocrites, don't say anything good about them, waaa me: ok ? not what i meant anyway, did you understand my actual point ? you: i don't have time time to actually DEBATE intelligently, leave me alone, waaaa me: ok ? lol i never messaged you, you're free to go you: waaa what a crybaby
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:27 AM
1

I'm not reading all that ;) later lady boy, stay triggered over conservatives !
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:56 AM
1

you commented to me lol doesn't bother me if you're too much of a neoliberal nonbinary lady boy to debate like a man;)
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:38 AM
1

oh you don't have time ? oh you don't care enough to spend the time ? my bag did i go out of my way to reply to your comment ? no. you went out of your way to comment on a random internet strangers comment - you took time out of your day to reply to me - just bc you got so triggered that you thought somebody said something positive about conservatives that your group think sheepish tribal mind had to cry about it lol... just like religious people do when they hear any insult to their God bro tha…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:12 AM
1

see how you're trying to redefine well known terms and getting defensive and offended at a label you subscribe to - almost like i insulted your religion - instead of trying to see or debating any of the specific points i thoroughly outlined ? and announcing ahead of time that you're giving up so that the second you start to lose you can just run away and say "oh i didn't care to" . lmfao, bro that's pathetic as it is predictable and only proves my point. I'm not dumb enough to subscribe to all t…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:41 AM
1

point taken - the "both sides" fallacy is tired but that's not what i was trying to do. you've gotta read the nuance of my comment. there's a difference between someone (incorrectly) claiming that annoying neoliberals are as dangerous to democracy as the growing extremism on the right and pointing out that neoliberals specifically - not even the entire left, JUST neoliberals - are developing religious traits correct?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:25 AM
-2

let's not get racist on this sub first of all literally every race have invented things , humans are humans regardless of skin color or a few thousand years of different climates also white men often DID actually take credit for the inventions or legwork of other races of men bc there was REAL oppression and ACTUAL slavery toward them. unlike women who nobody actually enslaved or oppressed 99% of the time- it was just their role and PRIVILEGE to stay at home where it's safe with children, not br…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:20 AM
2

no doubt at all, that was not intended as praise still - you've gotta admit that conservatives at least admit they're Christian and take the good and the bad that comes with professing a religious adherence neoliberals act like they're atheist, scientific, objective and above sheepish religious group think but now you can't disagree with one part of their "doctrine" like - hey maybe i think elementary school children shouldn't be learning about sex at all, let alone transitioning to a different …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:41 AM
4

i gotta stick with culty religion bc what I'm getting at is the fact that less and less people are religious now - not that that's a bad thing - but i think the school of thought that that is leaving an inevitable vacuum in society that is being filled with other things may be true looking at this conservative vs neoliberal groupthink phenomena.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:33 PM
16

i know you're just a pathetic troll but fyi - nobody who isn't a complete rapist dirtbag would do that anyway. there's not some clueless kid who's like "whoops accidentally tried to trick her into thinking i had a condom on, i didn't know That was bad. all this does is let women now claim an innocent guy did that when he didn't. there's already a law about this - if you knowingly withhold std's from a partner and they catch it from you, you go to jail. that applies for men and women. that's why …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:04 PM
8

exactly. all in unison.. as if it's some of group think, cult or what do they call that at mass? oh ya.. religion. idk if it's been like this or I'm just now noticing it but i really am starting to see that this neo liberal progressivism is not the absence of religion but just a new form of it. at least hardcore conservatives admit that they're religious. progressives are in some deep denial of how much they are operating like a culty religion with excommunicating you by canceling you and once y…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:49 PM
2

why doesn't it have negative votes ? looks like a bunch of people agree to me
/r/MensRights22/07/23 10:47 AM
7

what du you mean
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:47 PM
5

the primary difference between men and women - and a nice one i might add - is that men have never NEEDED women for anything. women have always needed men. don't forget that. literally the INSTANT all men simply say "no" . or "no I'm not going to give you that/do that for you" , is the moment feminism ends. that's why feminists, and even regular women fear men, as they should. it takes good strong even MORE masculine men to keep other bad men in check and ensure they neither mistreat women nor p…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:59 PM
35

exactly g.i Joe movies didn't make fun of the supporting female characters bc there's no actual patriarchal agenda to make women look bad but barbie could similarly just do a fun women focused story with Ken as a respected yet unimportant side character - but no way they pass up this chance to shit all over men to further try to normalize it in pop culture. ironically continuing the pathetic trope of defining a woman only by her relationship to a man in the process. wouldn't doubt if the whole p…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:52 PM
20

uhhh, na, just bc they got the current most popular actors on the planet i think everybody's gonna see this one unfortunately
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:42 PM
3

exactly what i was thinking of we all know the truth, it's silly that we keep up the charade in most people's minds most men are disposable . people pay lip service to equality, but look no further than the draft to see how people really feel. deep down people still believe women DESERVE to be worshiped and men are just here to be human body shields and give them shit they want. so if that ever flips with a woman providing anything to a man then it fucks with their core worldview and you get ser…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:28 PM
2

oh damn, clever . might backfire just like this post did, but maybe it would work, idk. and actually i think divorce courts sometimes make the richer spouse pay for lawyers right? idk. very true that they're biased, but nowadays you do occasionally hear about men coming out on top when the women makes more. not as much as if it were a woman , but still walking away with some money and alimony, like i said i read that that's why some states are changing the laws bc they don't want men to be able …
/r/MensRights17/07/23 10:17 AM
10

you're good, i was piggy backing off your thoughts as well she absolutely sounds sociopathic. the good news is she fucked up by marrying him instead of just coparenting when he makes so much less, so maybe he can get alimony for the "maintaining the lifestyle he's grown accustomed to". it's bullshit obviously, but hey, if they can do it so can he. that's aspirant why Florida is trying to limit alimony so men can't get it the same way women can
/r/MensRights17/07/23 09:48 AM
49

she's literally a millionaire $400k AFTER taxes means she's netting ridiculous wealth and he says she has lots of it tied up in properties that she owns. that means on paper at their age late 40's , she is definitely worth millions - yet won't even lend a penny for HEALTH related things. he's not asking for a fancy car or something, it's not even his own Healthcare, he's literally trying to keep his father alive. reverse the sexes and i guarantee you a MILLIONAIRE man that forces his wife to pay…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 09:13 AM
-5

that's not what my comment was about have a good one
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:39 AM
5

well since the second sentence of my reply said "i don't catcall" and the end of it said " harassment is already a crime" then it sounds more like your commenting here is just about you intentionally misinterpreting people. I'm not a nutjob like you sound like, so I'm not gonna exaggerate your pathetic crying on this sub as "harassment" , bc harassment entails much more than just trolling or being a pathetic person who nobody likes. for a harassment charge or even sexual harassment charge to sti…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:37 AM
1

that doesn't respond to anything specific i actually wrote so have a good one
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:25 AM
6

exactly. not only this but we all know how important freedom of speech is on principle. then again I'm American and we left Londons dumbass for telling us what God/pope/king we had to pay lip service to and couldn't speak our minds about. are women you all's gods/popes/kings now? yelling fire/bomb in a crowded place or calling for violence on a person/group will get someone KILLED so we have an exception. catcalling a woman gets no one killed so it is a dangerous overstep bc it's literally speec…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:05 AM
11

damn right i am. i don't catcall. but i know how important freedom of speech is on principle. then again I'm American and we left Londons dumbass for telling us what God/pope/king we had to pay lip service to and couldn't speak our minds about. are women you all's gods/popes/kings now? yelling fire/bomb in a crowded place or calling for violence on a person/group will get someone KILLED so we have an exception. catcalling a woman gets no one killed so it is a dangerous overstep bc it's literally…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:03 AM
15

i thought something was fishy desantis doesn't care about men, precisely the opposite. i figured it was just a sub section of a bill that he didn't even read but it being intentionally aimed at continuing to maintain the good parts of conservative tradition for women while minimizing the pain to them so that the work horse men continue to pay for their mistakes like it's always been traditionally sounds about right
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/23 12:13 PM
7

this is closer to my opinion on this specific issue more importantly than her CHOOSING to be a housewife in the 50's is that women's options for other jobs were truly somewhat limited - not to the extent they now claim and perhaps sometimes for the better but the had less choice before legislation getting them even better working conditions than men. so then i would agree with alimony too since that was simply the way things had been done somewhat out of necessity until then. but now, with the c…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/23 12:09 PM
14

where is home? edit: based off autobhan , in Europe i take it?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:07 AM
1

please for the love of God report their dumbasses
/r/MensRights28/06/23 02:48 AM
24

you have one right in your post you just said you seek to understand and empathize both men and women but then you say that's hard to do when you hear about a woman raped by a man and little done about it. then why doesn't it also make it hard for you to empathize with women when you hear an example of a woman raping a man or boy ? let me guess - bc that's less common right ? or is it? - did you know that in most countries women CANNOT legally be convicted of rape even when they do rape a man ? …
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter