| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Feminist research fellow: Put all men 'in some kind of camp'If we go to war with Iran, Russia, North Korea, China, etc, a revived draft will accomplish what she wants but the vans in the camp won't be white (unless location is snowbound). She'll be able to stay home and safe. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/15 07:04 PM |
| 5 | Dads (x-post from r/pics)Yeah, it's like if, in the movie Titanic, Rose (Kate Winslet) had stayed in the lifeboat as Jack urged her to, so Jack (DiCaprio) could have survived on the debris -- they would have both survived, gotten married, gotten divorced, etc. It's just not a romantic picture anymore. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/15 07:06 PM |
| 8 | Dads (x-post from r/pics)Just put him on your shoulders and have him in charge of holding the umbrella -- kids love both of those things. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/15 06:15 PM |
| 11 | #IChoseYou by Vaastav Foundation is in response to #MyChoice video. It's not only women who compromise or need to suppress their choices. Men do a lot of compromises for others too. If women are going to make choices without considering its effects on others, then men can do so tooThe sentiment is clearly appropriate for either gender. Each individual should strive to achieve their best potential and realize that all choices are made in a framework limited by circumstances. Sometimes circumstances can be cruel, so anyone feeling trapped ought to be encouraged to think outside the box in order to choose not just the "lesser evil," but the least evil (and hopefully something one considers a best choice). | /r/MensRights | 05/04/15 04:44 PM |
| 0 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedMost new demand simply replaced old demand; that's why the world does not have full employment. If corporations are job creators then they are responsible for the job market. But they don't and they're not. The Fox News talking points of job creators attempts to take credit for employment while shirking obligations for unemployment and thus frustrate true conservatives. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/14 05:17 AM |
| 0 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedOh gosh, you're one of those people who thinks the govt should pay people for digging ditches and then filling it back in because it creates salaries. You are an odd mix of puedo Econ rhetoric. The bottled water industry is a great example of crony capitalism, not efficient markets. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/14 05:06 AM |
| -1 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedIf you were right we'd have had full employment for decades. But only buyers create demand -- that's Econ 101. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/14 04:55 AM |
| 0 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedCorrect. More corporate profits for the 1% that decimated free drinkable water. And are you well read on the water scams going on in California? Shameful stuff that makes regular people hate corporations. Also, the bottled water industry has created more jobs cleaning up the environment of plastic bottles too. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/14 04:51 AM |
| -1 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedMoreover, demand for post-its reduced demand for what it substituted (scratch paper, tape, etc), so demand was not "created" but diverted. Otherwise we'd have full employment because successful new products are created everyday. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/14 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedIf job creators can "create demand out of nowhere" with "marketing departments" them tell them to create enough demand to reduce unemployment to 4%. Oh, wait, that's not the way it works, huh. My point exactly. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/14 10:39 PM |
| -4 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedIf 3M or any other business can't sell its products they can't retain those employees. As for evolution and Big Bang, 95% of the people spewing the nonsensical "job creator" rhetoric believe in creation. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/14 08:20 PM |
| 9 | Hillary 2016: why all men should be concernedBuyers create jobs, not sellers. When buyers don't buy, sellers lay off employees; when buyers buy more, sellers "create" jobs. Buyers are the 99% and the 1%. "Job creators" terminology is a smoke screen -- an obvious political euphemism to any true economist. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/14 02:07 PM |
| 1 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.Correct. So see u/Dasque comments then read mine in context. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/14 01:59 PM |
| 0 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.Are you replying to my post? If so, what are you saying is wrong with the chart? | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 05:42 PM |
| 5 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.The ideal is what should be promoted to help stomp out the injustices you speak of. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 05:02 PM |
| 4 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.I don't see how you can say that. It seems to me this is a very evenhanded flowchart. What if some man raped you? Go through the chart thinking of yourself as the victim. If some man fucked you up the ass, knowing that you did not consent, but was admittedly very drunk, is it not rape? | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.The best way to test this chart is to consider yourself the victim of rape in various scenarios. "Did the other person know that they were having sex with you against your will?" -> Yes, then you were raped. (Proving this to a jury is a different issue.) Then last question: "Was the other person too drunk to know what they were doing?" I'm not sure it can be both, but if it can, then I think the chart is correct. Perhaps both questions can be true when the perpetrator who raped you knew it was a… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 04:25 PM |
| 15 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net."Did the other person know that they were having sex with you against your will?" -> Yes -> "Was the other person too drunk to know what they were doing?" I'm not sure it can be both, but if it can, then I think the chart cannot lead to a situation where both were raped or where the man is wrongly held responsible. (Moreover, Dasque: sometimes both the perpetrator and victim are male.) | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 04:04 PM |
| 2 | Male Disposability on Daily Show: UN Secretary General sad about deaths of "women and girls around the world"... no mention of men or boysUN Peacekeepers, huge violations of human rights, women and girls | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 07:29 PM |
| 12 | UK: Fathers who attempted to remove their daughters from houses where sexual abuse was taking place, were themselves arrested by police.Unclear | /r/MensRights | 27/08/14 05:02 PM |
| 2 | “Most males would never do anything to harm a young woman.”—William Pollack, Harvard Medical School psychologistAnd other women perceive it as their power, their feminine wilds -- as something to control men with (rather than the other way around). | /r/MensRights | 22/08/14 07:20 PM |
| 1 | Indian men- better apologize!Thanks for your post. It seems more like white-knighting because they say sorry rather than solidarity. You can't really apologize for others unless you're admitting to saying or doing things that added to the dysfunctional culture aspects at issue (which would have been useful -- but white knights aren't grey knights). Cutting off the penis is a white-knight over-the-top comment that actually adds to the confusion. Just like corporal punishment is thought to be so useful by early cultures, but … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/14 08:13 AM |
| 3 | Indian men- better apologize!Men apologizing for violent men = trying to garner points with women. Men talking to men = more productive, but without the women watching few of these men would go through the effort. Pathetic, since there's a very real problem throughout the world. I guess we should all just apologize for every bad thing in the world to clear our consciouses and not worry about actually doing anything. http://youtu.be/9u0EL_u4nvw | /r/MensRights | 11/08/14 07:47 PM |
| 2 | John Oliver talks about prisons in the US, and the prevalence of male rape in the prison system.Thanks! Wikipedia claims it was first used on 10-31-74 in the book "Rape The First Sourcebook For Women": http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_culture I can't find a pinpoint date for movie, but I see that this is a contentious debate between MRA and fems. I wonder if the term was used in book and movie independent of one another in a similar way that the computer chip was invented by two different men (see the book "The Chip" - a great read). After all the term "rape culture" is not that unique … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/14 03:55 PM |
| 3 | John Oliver talks about prisons in the US, and the prevalence of male rape in the prison system.What is source for origin of rape culture? If you're right, Wikipedia needs to be updated. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 07:44 PM |
| 2 | Woman makes 14 false rape claims -- against the same manTrue, but it is more than that -- the 36 hours is just a small part of the harm to him. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/14 07:47 AM |
| 2 | Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidenceNo. Criminal case is brought by the govt. incidentally it is not a crime for this 17yo boy and 15yo girl to have sex, but the boy is being prosecuted for two felonies: manufacture and dissemination of child porn. It's not clear if 15yo pics she sent first were also sexting, but if so it is weird that they aren't charging her too. Either is a waste of tax dollars and a govt crime beyond reason. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/14 10:52 PM |
| 6 | Professor suggests men suing for violations of their due process rights are "campus predators"So Prof. Heldman is saying these men are "uppity"? Ironic. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/14 08:39 PM |
| 2 | Actual quotes: add these to the misandry hall of fameThx for your efforts on these issues. My main point though is that if these date rape claims are resolved by the universities, rather than the courts, miscarriages of justice do much less damage. There are many crazy prosecutors and judges in our legal system -- and few ways to correct it. Remember Gary Dotson? When his accuser, Cathleen Crowell Webb, was "born again" and then recanted, the feminists claimed that she was lying in recanting her story. I think it was DNA that ultimately proved his… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/14 11:20 PM |
| 2 | Actual quotes: add these to the misandry hall of fameOP: thx for submission. Reminds me of the long list in the book "Who Stole Feminism." As to airline seating, those who don't want to sit next to men or have a child not sit next to men do me a great favor in not sitting next to me. I don't want to sit next to crazy. As to expulsion for false findings of rape, the criminal justice system punishes the falsely accused much more harshly. Perhaps men who are victims of wrongful university systems should realize that crazy can always do damage. It's a… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/14 08:35 PM |
| 2 | You go, girl! Great argument!You wrote: "If you think a woman reaching down to another woman who tripped on the ground to help her up is an act of retaliation towards men, there's not much I can say to you to change your mind." --> I never wrote that; are you insane? You wrote: "When you say women can't be women...." --> I never wrote that; are you insane? So you're purportedly not a troll, you just can't keep the reality of what someone wrote straight from what you hear someone saying in your demented mind? Your response h… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 05:19 PM |
| 6 | You go, girl! Great argument!Wolfebane84 already explained it. The double standard in the comic is when the feminist says she is mainly focused on inequality for women. Double standard is defined as: ": a situation in which two people, groups, etc., are treated very differently from each other in a way that is unfair to one of them." Thus one could create a similar comic where a kkk activist says he is against racism but he mainly focuses on white pride. When the other person calls him out on it, he says "you, you're the re… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 04:08 PM |
| 1 | THE ORIGINS OF “PRIVILEGE”John Calvin's original sin = concupiscence. Hasn't original sin been wrapped up in sexual desire, male dominance, male and female promiscuity as inherently wrong, etc? Don't some feminists equate many animal sexual encounters as synonymous with rape and abuse of the male over female? The comparisons of strident feminists to religious fundamentalists has been made countless times before regardless of whether one agrees with it. The point of privilege being used in a manner similar to original sin… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/14 07:58 PM |
| 5 | Norway proposes change in constitution to say: Women's rights are more important than men'sPerhaps it should instead be "... to ensure that traditional gender roles are not used as an excuse to deny such equal rights" -- thus helping both genders. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/14 05:13 PM |
| 1 | Women are the real victimsFrom "primary" you get that she was dismissive, lying, and spitting in the faces of live and dead vets? Then guess how non-soldiers who've been the victims of horrific war crimes feel when a leader finally acknowledges them. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/14 04:23 PM |
| 1 | Women are the real victimsGood points. Women also lose limbs, suffer PTSD and mental issues, rape, and torture in war torn areas. The damage from war can be quite extreme and prolonged. As to what's worse, RIP or dying, consider the non-war, civil litigation context where plaintiffs recover more for those who suffer significant damage versus wrongful death. Obviously death is worse but monetary recovery for damages related to the suffering living is often much more. Law students often get upset about this, and maybe they… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/14 02:57 PM |
| 0 | Women are the real victimsGood point. But wasn't H Clinton speaking from the perspective of the living? Isn't this the full quote: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. --- Conference on domestic viole… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 04:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter