TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ConsciousFood201 Archive

View 0 posts and 351 comments by ConsciousFood201 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think you replied to the wrong comment. No one was asking you if you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 08:18 PM
1

Met a ton of cool people and did my absolute best to make them feel like the incredible people they were. Sex wasn’t bad either. Zero one night stands. Get to know someone a little bit before you get naked with them. Is that too much to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 01:30 PM
30

I became single in my 30’s and dated women in their early 20’s on through early 40’s. There is beauty and grace at every age my man. The world is a beautiful place. Now, for them on the other hand, I gotta say I felt pretty badly. Men weren’t representing any of us very well. Lot of pictures of the animals they shot on profiles and shit like that. Made it easy for a guy like me to move about. Lot of conversation killing responses. Just no game on the male side of my area. Fine with me. I had a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:40 AM
1

Also the people with active social lives tend not to be the ones who end up single long term. When you’re out and about mixing with different people, odds are someone’s gonna stick. It’s how we’re wired.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:43 PM
-4

Everyone reading the comment understands it how I do. You’re just in an echo chamber right now where everyone falls all over each other to agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:13 PM
0

You didn’t say “I’ve tried this” you said “it wouldn’t matter.” Big difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:58 PM
3

What about game though? Would Adam Driver on his schlubiest day not still command attention with his confidence/presence? Not disagreeing with anything you guys are saying but my personal experience as a mediocre looking guy who is tall and extremely confident/quick witted, is that conventional attractiveness isn’t needed by men as much as it’s needed by women (because of your points about how women all take care of themselves). No one has ever referred to me as a good looking guy but I’ve low k…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:57 PM
-8

You’re missing the point. The person you’re responding to doesn’t know. As in, they haven’t even tried doing it. They’re completely validating the point you’re making. They’re so lazy they can’t be bothered to try. They just say “it wouldn’t work anyway.” Nothing could have illustrated your point better.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:28 PM
-10

So in other words, you don’t know. You’re just speculating. Could you be lazier…?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:27 PM
2

If they don’t have options, they’re below average. It’s as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 02:17 AM
1

It’s also bad if you aren’t as valuable as you thought you were and online dating exposed that fact. Other than that your comment really couldn’t have said it better! Online dating helped me in ten fold in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 02:15 AM
1

They won’t though. Trust me, they won’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 01:39 AM
8

This sub is full of dudes looking for any vulva diversity they can find.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 11:33 PM

Those are actually pretty wide margins compared to what they’ve been in the last couple elections. Trump won big. No one cares about the margin of error for the polls. That doesn’t mean anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:50 PM
1

Once you account for all the bots/npcs that vote red/blue no matter who, there aren’t many undecideds. Both parties went into this election thinking it would be days before we knew the results. We knew on election night who was gonna win. That’s called a route.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:18 PM
2

Wait what? I thought black pill was those chips that hate everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:17 PM
2

This was not a close election. By any standard of measurement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:00 AM
7

I’m in the US and my experience on Tinder was very positive. Wouldn’t call it hook up obsessed. I got married before Tinder existed and divorced after it was already well established. My dating experience was night and day post divorce vs before I was married. Met tons of cool women I simply wouldn’t have met in person. I have nothing but the best to say about Tinder. I suspect majority of the complaints we hear about is from guys that are using it poorly. I know a few of these guys. Theyre the …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 12:03 AM
2

Is apex fallacy the one where I think I’m not an apex guy, but my reasoning is fallacious so I am, in fact, an apex Chad? Cause I hope that’s what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 09:48 PM
2

This is an incredibly interesting topic that I’ve seen touched upon a few times on this subreddit (really nowhere else), and people seem to run from it as fast as they can. Where we draw that line is vastly important. It’s wrong to refuse to hire a person based on the color of their skin, but we don’t do the same thing to protect people with a workable innate characteristic. Someone with a hunched back or asymmetrical face is less likely to be hired as well but we don’t really want to talk about…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:18 PM
15

In my experience tall is really all that is necessary lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:13 PM
0

This is just your opinion and you’re extrapolating it to most women for no reason. I’m not redpill apologist but you’re flat out wrong. Broader shouldered men are more attractive. Maybe it’s not as successful a trait as being tall (imo as a tall guy with more of a swimmers build myself), which has to be the most attractive characteristic a guy can have, but it’s right up there with the best of them. To say women would prefer a skinny guy over broader shouldered otherwise like alternative is just…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:12 PM
1

Like all tough things in life, it’s simple and complicated at the same time. Change the way you think. We’re just meat computers wired to think in certain patterns. For some people just reminding themselves not to care about the thing that hurts them is enough. A little each day and they can change their thought patterns around. Others use tactics such as mindfulness meditation or mantras. Therapy is a tool for helping to ease unwanted mental burdens. Point is, we are not helpless. Once we becom…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:04 PM
1

The part where the rejection hurts is within your control. You might think “no way! It’s a known fact that when a woman isn’t attracted to me, it has to cause a physiological chain that ends in me feeling sad and hurt.” That doesn’t have to be the case. You’re looking at the whole thing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:19 AM
6

Isn’t that its own form of freedom in a way? I read the exchange you had with the chad you’re replying to and it struck me that you guys come from such different places but still share a similar issue. For the person that’s a millionaire and has all this shit going on there’s a pressure to keep it going. Where would he be in his social circle if he faced some kind of life circumstance where he couldn’t keep up? What if his business went under or he mismanaged his finances in a humiliating way. O…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 06:12 PM
1

Take this shit over to r/teenagers where it belongs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:56 AM
0

Just that their life is harder because of their “condition.” We’ll use an umbrella of things. Inability to have the same quality of life due to not being able to start a family. It’s just my production, bud. If you don’t agree 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:42 PM
1

I’ll take your word for it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:17 PM
-1

Discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:16 PM
3

A few years back I made a prediction that “incel” (the way the term originated and not the meme it’s become commonly used to disparage), would eventually start to a push to be a protected class. This comment gave me vibes of that prediction. This is how it starts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 03:42 PM
2

I haven’t kept up with what has he gone off the deep end about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 03:40 PM
1

I promise you I didn’t win the lotto. I just kept sight of what I wanted and didn’t compromise or let myself fall into bad destructive habits. It sounds simple but that’s really all there is to it. Start searching your life for things you know aren’t right. Write them down. Start working on extinguishing them from your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 01:50 PM
-2

I said your comment is sad. That’s what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:16 PM
6

My man, I am a happily married dude with four kids. My wife is a sexy Scandinavian. She literally grew up in a town called Skandia and her last name was Carlson lol. We have zero drama. Ever. She cooks. I clean. Sometimes we each do a little of the other. We coach each other up professionally (she’s actually the bread winner but I was when we met), we have each others back emotionally, we bring our kids to church on Sunday and they’re not the wildest kids but definitely not the most well behaved…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:16 PM
27

This is really well put! My only question is how do you define as blue pill? Unless I’m not understanding correctly, what you just wrote here IS the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:08 PM
-1

What difference does it make?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:53 PM
-1

What if you didn’t know you really liked them until the second or third date and the third date with the other person was first. You gotta have that first partner sex. You shouldn’t feel guilty about it just cause you end up going with partner 2 after really clicking that second date. You’re weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 04:47 PM
2

Really? I was just thinking you’re seeing two people. You started dating one before the other so sex happens earlier but you end up marrying the second one. You might end up having some irrelevant sex with the first one that overlaps with the start of seeing the second one. I don’t really see that as any kind of deal breaker. Unless you were sure about the second one and still banged the first one but even that isn’t exactly the end of the world if you’re just figuring things out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 03:26 PM
1

I think we’ve all been on that spot where we’re dating and obviously we know they’re dating and we kinda wanna make it exclusive but don’t wanna be awkward about it or act too soon. There’s a dance to be done there. I would bet attractive people who aren’t prudes about sleeping with people had their spouse sleep with someone else meaninglessly right before they made it official that they were exclusively dating (or did so themselves). It’s not a huge deal. A little discretion goes a long way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 02:52 PM

The thing you think you’re being asked to put a mask on, your identity or “self,” is itself already an illusion. You’re not the tiny voice inside your head. That’s just internalized dialogue that is created as a byproduct of learning spoken language. What you actually “are,” is just a walking meat computer of acquired habits and circumstantial chemical reactions to external stimuli. It’s not that complicated. You’re over thinking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 10:40 PM
2

Yeah I know. I think that’s what should happen. But I don’t have to like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:16 PM
7

I don’t want them to either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 08:44 PM
12

The government doesn’t pay for anything. You realize that, right? The government ain’t out here working a job 9-5 to pay for shit. That’s my money they’re paying with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 08:20 PM

There are two separate events. One is whether to have the child. The second is whether to support it once it is born. The first event everyone has a choice on. Unfortunately, women have n additional choice as they will be the one carrying the child. The initial choice I refer to is sex. Once pregnant, a woman can choose to carry out the pregnancy. Once both parties have confirmed the pregnancy (with the sex and with the woman agreeing to carry the child) we move to the second part. This is to su…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 10:50 AM
7

But it has to be because her life will suck without him. That way she’ll be desperate enough to put the work into OP that he doesn’t put into himself. It’s really the same old thing on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:43 PM
10

I don’t think OP has much of a chance to make a woman’s life better. But he would like a woman (ahem, preferably a super beautiful wealthy one). To make his life better. You hit the nail on the head but this isn’t a reasonable post by OP. It says more about them than it does about anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:28 PM
7

I think OP is the kind of dude that wants a woman who will make his life WAAAYYY better. Like, solve all the shit that’s going wrong with OP so OP doesn’t have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:25 PM
2

The premise doesn’t support the conclusion though. You’re hand waving through the inauthenticity of the mask as if it’s self evident and a bad thing. It couldn’t be farther from the case. The mask isn’t inauthentic. It’s a necessary distillation of what you are into a more palatable format for everyday out and about living. We can’t all just be our true selves all the time. Nothing would ever get done. We would struggle to communicate at all. Our mask allows us ti see and understand other people…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:41 AM
2

So I’m following along with you, except for the part where your mask causes an internal crisis. That part just kinda popped up out of thin air. Sure, we all wear a mask in public. Sure, we all keep parts of ourself to ourselves even from the ones we’re closest with. Why is that crisis worthy? That doesn’t seem like the kind of thing that should trigger a crisis. That’s just how things work. I don’t think your eyes are as open as you think they are. These comments reek of self destruction. The ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:16 PM
5

Some guys get a woman to settle for them. Some guys fall short of that. The answer isn’t one or the other. It’s both at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:35 PM
6

Maybe you should find a good church. Ya know, get out of the house a little…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 07:59 PM
3

We have it great. You don’t know what hard times are. Your privilege is so extreme that you think there’s a chance you might not have it good.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 07:57 PM
7

Vast majority of women settle for a guy in their range. The people bitching on this subreddit are mad that they’re not even in the game but think they should be because their mom thinks they are nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 07:53 PM
1

The things you listed as good enough incentive for men to seek medical help are bull shit terrible things to use as incentives. That was my point. Incentives can’t be to not get some disease some far away day. People don’t think like that. The incentives I’m talking about are like: get a pro state exam and it saves you money on your health insurance deductible and it’s delivered in the form of a $200 check the week of the Super Bowl and the insurance company saves on the amount of money it doles…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:08 PM
2

Yeah! It’s the men’s fault! See! Call them all rapists more. See if that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:02 PM
1

I too like to make complex things sound simple so I can look like I’m above the issues of other people. Sounds like we can safely rule you out of public policy though, which is great.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:01 PM
3

Dude. Other way around. I hope you get this message before the next time you drive a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:59 AM
0

Maybe instead of a committee of people, who will take the money they are paid regardless of whether their conclusions are helpful at all, maybe we should simply incentive people that do the things that benefit society. We make this stuff way more complicated than it needs to be. We need better incentives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:52 PM
8

Sometimes this subreddit has interesting discussion. Other times it’s super sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:20 PM
6

Spot on. I was going to add that, as a married dude, I don’t look at the emotional support situation anything like OP states. My wife is way more emotional than me and I support her because it seems like a metric fuck ton of work to be that emotional. The thing is, support isn’t some huge burden in my life. I just listen to her story and do my best to chime in with good advice. Never once has she indicated that I wasn’t being emotionally supportive enough because I gave bad or light advice. I’m …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 06:38 PM
1

Parenting doesn’t suck. What is disturbing is the company you keep. They sound like lowlifes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:34 AM
1

What kind of Muslims though? There are a lot of Muslims/Catholics/Christians that identify as such but do little else than use god as a superstition to keep them from committing minor crimes that they might otherwise get away with. Kinda like, “Santa is watching!”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:58 PM

I think they meant their SO wouldn’t like it if a male friend did that to their GF. That’s how I read it. A gay friend wouldn’t be a big deal though. He could act more like a girl friend and be touchy or bawdy (which I don’t know what that means but it makes sense in the context of the reply lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 01:54 AM
1

I thought dating sucked BEFORE Tinder. I got married and ended up getting divorced (we get along great, we just weren’t the right people to be married). Once I got divorced I fucked with Tinder and met tons of cool women. Then I met the most amazing woman I would have never met irl (she’s a huge introvert). Now we’re married and just had a baby. Obviously individual results may vary. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 01:54 PM
1

Why not just find an ugly partner? Aren’t there ugly women? Are you too good for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 11:25 PM
3

To be fair, I’m a retail middle manager and I can tell you more times than not, the person just needs to go. Both sides end up happier. We like to think of the manager being firm and saying “these are the expectations, if that doesn’t line up with what you’re looking for, maybe it’s time for you to explore other options,” then when the employee leaves the company is in shambles and the manager is begging them to stay but in reality it’s the opposite. Sure, being short staffed is always challengi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:03 PM

I kinda think a productive career, or just a productive output in general will make most men happy though. Obviously not all men, but it comes down to whether we’re allowed to/want to believe men and women are different across broad numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 12:40 AM
-4

wtf is this BS? Now only construction workers are allowed to have a say? It’s called social critique. OP doesn’t have to work outside in order to recognize what’s going on. Disagree with him if you want but choosing this pathway to do so makes you look petty and wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:27 PM
4

I was applying to med school when she found out she was pregnant. Shortly after the babe was born I got declined. She worked minimum wage jobs and for large stretches didn’t work at all. She faced contempt of court multiple times over back payments. When it’s a woman we call that responsibility. What do we call that if the gender roles are reversed? I’m guessing we use a different work than responsibility. I guess it’s just different when those two X chromosomes…. 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:26 AM
3

Woman face the sale risk bro. You’re not special.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:23 AM
2

If he wants to give it to strangers what’s the problem? Let the kid go up for adoption. If he wants to take care of the little guy then he should be able to. And mom will pay child support if she doesn’t participate. I made more money than my son’s mom his whole life and she paid every month (well, except when she didn’t have a job, but then she accrued back payments that she eventually paid when she did have a job). The rules are fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:47 AM
4

If a guy is that uninvolved and doesn’t get out on the hook for financial responsibility, what’s the problem? If the guy wants to take care of his child he can absolutely get that baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:50 PM
4

Nonsense. Roll the dice! Don’t be a wimp. Just be smart about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:25 PM
4

Nope. I have a son who’s mom pulled the goalie on me then promptly left us after he was born (I got denied to med school right after he was born). She peace’s out and paid me child support for 18 years. They don’t take responsibility in every case. ✌️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:22 PM
1

Dad would get to take the kid though. And mom would have to pay support. There is no termination of rights by mom of a child she gives birth to. This is simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:19 PM
9

Mom doesn’t have the ability to relinquish her support of the child once it’s born. Neither does dad. You’re mixing up two entirely different situations into the same thing. Source: had a baby with a woman who decided she didn’t want to be a mom. She took off. Paid child support u til said baby was 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:18 PM
1

When a woman doesn’t want a child but has one anyway, she is not cleared of financial responsibility just because she leaves the babe with dad and peace’s out. There are two discussions you are conflating. The decision to have a child physically and the decision to care for said child once it is born. Mom gets to make one choice and neither party gets a say in the second one. If babe is born, both parents are involved in its financial burden. End of discussion. Not that difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:15 PM
0

What if men are just more ambitious than women? I know it sounds sexist but what if the male’s role in things is to be the one who is on an adventure and the woman’s role is to be the support partner at his side? Obviously the roles will be reversed and some women will have a support man on their journey and of course this will wax and wane where sometimes the woman’s career takes up more of the mental energy of both partners or the woman is a homemaker but really needs dad to be more involved a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:12 PM
2

What’s the elephant in the room? I’m kind of a smooth brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:06 PM
1

RIP this entire subreddit. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:54 PM
1

Wild bro
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:01 PM
3

Look, I’m just salty that Owens played as many snaps at safety as he did. That he was the best they could roll out there. The Packers were a drive away from playing in the NFCCG. If you want to see dudes downplay pro athletes just go to literally any pro sports teams subreddit. Any one of them will do. You won’t have to look far. We’re fans. Not conscientious observers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:24 PM
1

I don’t really understand your point. You say she is the prize (she is) then the next sentence says that in general women marry into higher socioeconomic levels. Based on what? How you feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:21 PM
5

Call it what you will, but i was told you have to support your wife to be valuable. Not be equal earners. If this woman was married to a surgeon, literally no one would be surprised. If nothing else, my story should give people around here hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:31 PM
2

I heard from trusted advisors. You gotta trust me on this one bro. I wouldn’t fuck around about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:10 PM
4

We were probably making the same money when we first started getting serious enough to have an idea of what each other makes. I was definitely like, “this woman is fucking going places…. 👀” she is super introverted but insanely effective. I’m like her 6’6” extroverted support animal (I do work and make decent money myself fwiw). Full disclosure she’s out of my league in basically every way except height. She’s 5’10” so maybe that’s on the tall end for women whereas my height is undeniably top 1%…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:09 PM
2

I didn’t listen to the interview but as I said elsewhere maybe I’m a packers fan so I heard all about it. General consensus was he was messing around and the bit was that she’s obviously way more famous than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:02 PM
4

You’re missing one important angle though: he might want her to have his kids. He’s not a great nfl player and likely never will be, but he’s a great athlete and if they have five kids he might get a superstar something out of one of them. One last possibility: they might just get along great and have a ton of fun together. Oh and last point: my wife makes more money than me and I love every minute of it. She doesn’t keep her money separate or whatever. We just share. You guys gotta get your val…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:56 PM
8

No chance Owens makes what Biles does. Owens is just a guy. He’s not even rich as of the current state of his playing career.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:42 PM
35

Jonathan Owens is a teams guy who played way too many snaps on a shitty packers defense. I should know, I’m a Packer fan. He’s a pro athlete but like, barely… Pretty sure he was fucking around about saying he’s the prize. His wife is the most decorated gymnast in history and he’s the 48th guy on a roster for an organization that has been historically bad at finding defensive back depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:41 PM
2

Maybe you need to learn to love a cougar. Aka lower your standards. That’s the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:19 PM
2

As a mediocre man in basically every way (except height. Am tall), this is the correct answer and as reliable as anything else mentioned in this thread. Probably more reliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:18 PM
0

It’s the same for women as it is for men. If you can’t find a partner (loud enough for the people in the back): YOUR STANDARDS ARE TOO HIGH FOR YOUR LARKET VALUE! I can’t even imagine being a woman and having to pick any guy. We can’t possibly tell what a woman’s situation is. Only that if she can’t find a man, her standards are too high for her market value
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:26 PM
1

But the point is you wouldn’t know unless she told you. If she keeps it a secret and tells you she’s just been going to church and patiently waiting to find you how can you possibly know?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 06:31 PM
0

Can’t stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 06:29 PM
-2

I’m saying that you meet the woman of your dreams. She might have had a three some with a couple absolute disgustingly high N count douches one night when she was feeling slutty two years ago. The point is what’s the difference between knowing the guy and not knowing him? If she’s the woman of your dreams she’s the woman of your dreams.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:56 PM
-5

But if he’s not your friend you don’t know that he didn’t nut in your wife back in the day and she’s just not telling you. Your girl probably took a ride on a player if she’s not a land monster lol. Let people have their fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 03:24 PM
0

Yes. That is exactly what I said. You should have put quotes because it was word for word.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 03:23 PM
-4

I think it’s an insecure take. That’s all I’m saying. Never worked out for me that way and maybe the reason was I subconsciously ruled out any woman a friend had banged.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 03:22 PM
-8

It’s the same thing if you move away though. You meet a gal and she’s slept with X amount of friends that he could be boys with in the new area. At some point you gotta say, “she’s with me now and I’m her guy.” Being all insecure about who she’s slept with in the past seems cringy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:01 PM
1

Other side of it is he can be a good filter. You catch feelings for a woman that sees him for what he is and wants nothing to do with his ilk, you e likely found a gal who has a pretty good head on her shoulders. You sound threatened.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:57 PM
1

Chad isn’t a monolith. It’s more like there are tiers. I’m not a top tier guy necessarily but I’m tall and average looking so the the best looking women will put up friend zone defense fairly quickly lest I get the wrong idea, but very clearly second tier women will do all the stuff you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:54 PM
2

I get what you’re saying and I would t disagree, but the other side of it is she’s going to sleep with you if she’s going to sleep with you. A lot more matters than your strategy of talking. Is she in the right mood/place to be getting laid? Are you good enough looking? Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:51 PM
8

“Pray, express your gratitudes by bestowing a generous gift, m’lady!” -OP (proceeds to never get a gift of any kind)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:33 PM
2

“Pray, express your gratitudes by bestowing a generous gift, m’lady!” -OP (proceeds to never get a gift of any kind)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:32 PM
20

I was impressed at how well choreographed they were for being so many of them lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:15 PM
23

It’s neither. Some women sleep around and others don’t and all the options in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:14 PM
0

Some guys are good step dads and that’s a good thing. You sound like a pussy tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 11:55 PM
1

And you wonder why you don’t get laid…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 09:48 PM
1

Do whatever you want but don’t tell anyone what to do. There are far better men than you who are being stepdad’s right now. Helping to turn around outcomes for the kid whose own dad checked out. You sound soft and that’s fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 05:17 PM
3

The red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:34 PM
1

A real man can be a part of a healthy coparenting situation. If you aren’t up to the task, definitely steer clear. Being a man is about being a leader. It’s about being of value to your community. Leaving the community better than you found it. TRP doesn’t work if you try to use it as a hack. It only works if you actually make yourself valuable
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:33 PM
1

Thanks! Were so excited!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 12:24 PM
6

This is the best answer on this thread. Well said. A close second place would be the guy who said “no, I don’t give TRP as advise because the guy probably doesn’t want to hear it/isn’t ready for the truth.” (I’m paraphrasing). Not everyone’s goals are the same in the dating market, man or woman (though who are we kidding. They’re mostly the same across genders) but the advise your mom gave you is bad advise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 01:33 AM
1

I think you’re missing the point entirely tbh. You’re looking at red pill like a spread sheet. It’s not doctrine. It’s just a way to see the marketplace that gives a guy a little insight into “what women want.” It’s not a set of commandments that, if followed, will lead to sexy outcomes. It’s a detangling of current gender norms that once viewed through the correct lens help a guy to get out of his own way. You’re still gonna have to focus on the woman you’re on a date with. She’s still gotta be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 01:29 AM
2

I got a divorce, was kind of a sad sack for a little bit (just getting over things), stumbled on the red pill, some of it made sense in ways I hadn’t really thought of, other things seemed like a reach by guys who hated women. I took the good and avoided the bad and started low key killing it in the dating scene. Didn’t have to be disrespectful or treat women like things or children. Instead just kinda spun myself as more exciting than I might actually be in the most important ways. Found out th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 01:23 AM
1

I think the idea is that the marketplace underpins the emotional part. When you see someone who is a good match for you (not too high of value but not too low of value), you start to “have feelings” or talk yourself into that person. In a healthy world, if I see a woman who is a straight ten out of ten, I don’t get a crush on her because I know she’s out of my league. I save myself the heartbreak. Now, if she happens to say something to me a certain way… I could get the wrong idea… the feelings …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:54 PM
3

That last sentence. Yes. I do. I think what’s happening here is that you think you’re a 50% male and thus should do well with other 50% MV women but you don’t. Since that feels unfair, you have found a story that explains why this unfairness persists without having to acknowledge it might be you that’s the problem. In reality, you’re simply not as valuable on the market as you think you are/should be. Take a step back and consider: What is more likely? The entire world market for mate evaluation…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:32 PM
1

Hard disagree. It’s the same for both sexes. You’re doing some fancy framing. I’ve existed IRL, have slept with/been rejected with several women, and have spoken with attractive women who have not had it as easy as you think they have. The truth is, the woman you’re responding to original is probably attractive and so was easily able to find a suitable partner. Similarly, while nothing particularly special myself, I could likely just as easily find a sexual partner being myself a male. It doesn’…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:46 PM
0

That’s not true at all. The problem for you is that you wouldn’t be willing to lower your standards. That’s what you’re admitting here. There’s is always someone out there that would consider you a home run provided you truly are average and not bottom tier without self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:51 PM
6

Masterbation never quenches the thirst for me like actual sex. They’re almost different things and I feel like that’s more strange coming from a guy than for a gal for some reason. I’ve seen people talk about dead bedrooms like “if you’re a guy who doesn’t have sex with your wife, go jerk off. It’s easy for you.” That just couldn’t be further from the truth. There is definitely some magic to being skin to skin intimate with another person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:49 PM
1

To be clear I totally agree with what you are saying. I don’t cheat on my wife even though she affords me plenty of space and privacy to do so if I wanted. Fact is, I don’t want to. I just have sex with her cause she’s the only person I care to have sex with (sex is kind of a lot of work when you’re not married 😅) I was more just asking hypothetically why we all care that specific way that we do. Not trying to argue that anyone should be allowed to cheat. It certainly seems like it would be more…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:45 AM
0

Applies both ways. Just used the genders as an example. My point is if you go into a marriage both wanting sex and one party ops out, why should they care if their partner gets it elsewhere. Provided the other parts of the marriage stay the same. It’s at least a rational idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:26 AM
-6

I definitely agree. That being said, he might have already slept with two women since you guys married and you’ll never know. At some point we all have to live with our spouses and keep that part out of our minds. Whether he did or didn’t is largely immaterial as long as he continues to be the man you married.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:01 PM
0

Not if mom has been taking care of the kids more they don’t. This is 100% wrong. I’m no fan of the tropes used by this subreddit but if dad is the main earner and mom works less/a lower paying job and makes ends meet by being the primary parental caregiver the courts will absolutely learn towards mom (or dad if the roles are reversed) as a way to award the lower earning spouse a slice of the breadwinners income. They try to provide balance. Not so egalitarian that they fuck one parent or another…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:59 PM
-6

This is simply not true. Courts will take into account who changed the most diapers when it comes to difficult custody rulings. Speaking of echo chambers, have you been through a divorce before? That shit can be as nasty as either party wants to make it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:24 PM
-9

Here’s an honest question: if your wife doesn’t want to have sex, you find someone to have sex on her side with. Are discreet about it, and treat your wife with love and respect (this is the step most cheating men get wrong and why cheating is such a big problem), what reason would your wife have to even suspect anything is wrong? The reason it’s wrong to cheat is because you start treating your wife worse or resenting her in favor of your side hustle. That’s my take on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:23 PM
1

There’s very little reality involved though. Could the story I just told happen? Of course. But so could a zillion other scenarios that aren’t anything like my example. For instance here’s another potential example that is far more realistic: the dudes on this sub complaining have overestimated their market value. They think the qualities they possess, which being smart and funny, are what women should want. Problem is, anyone can do smart and funny. It’s not that marketable because it’s everywh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:23 PM
1

I think the big issue for the blue pill party isn’t so much that they’re jealous (of course that’s probably still a part of it), it’s that they see the casual sex women having fun with red pill Chad in her 20’s and then settling for beta buck Brad once they’re done with their nasty phase. That’s where MGTOW and shit like that comes from. She doesn’t want to start a family with you, she wants to ride on the back of Chad’s motorcycle but Chad can’t hold a job down, he left her for a younger woman,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:16 PM
5

Everyone is working on something man. Opinions are like buttholes. Everyone has em and they all stink.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:11 PM
2

Can you give me an example? Is sex one of the duties?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:06 PM
6

lol wut…? She has duties and… consequences…? You can’t be real.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:52 PM
16

This is a highly egotistical take. She could be feeling insecure about herself or depressed or something else just isn’t right. It’s not always about you…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:51 PM
3

He should lower his standards. Guaranteed they are too high. He ain’t that dude. Get off that high horse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:40 PM
4

This is where you lost me. You can’t generalize women to that level. You’re talking about one woman you have known in your life and extrapolating it over large sample sizes. This is and has been a bad faith argument from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:18 PM
9

Not to mention “superior” will always come from the outliers of any group. There will be brilliant black people that are smarter than almost all white people and athletically freakish white people that are more gifted than almost all black people. These outliers will typically end up hanging out with each other as they find more community that way than their phenotypic brethren. Like retired nba token white guy Brian Scalabrini put it, “I’m closer to LeBron James than you are to me,” as he was s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:53 PM
12

Guys who are too passive are going to lose out on opportunities where a passive woman is sitting there kinda hoping dude will ask her out. No doubt about that. He’s also going to lose out on a situation where a woman who isn’t necessarily passive who has other options maybe just got shot down or would go with our hypothetical hero if he made a play that “swept her off her feet,” so to speak. From a guys standpoint, you never want to be swinging a club and being a caveman. You always want to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 01:17 PM
1

Your bar is set too high. It’s as simple as that. There’s no reason you’re not finding the woman of your dreams if your expectations are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:51 PM
3

Ahh. A fellow knuckle dragger who out kicked the coverage. Love to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:06 PM
1

RIP to this entire sub with this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:19 PM
4

Wait a minute. Wtf! You’re up and down this thread fighting with everyone. Why aren’t you fighting with me? This is the internet! You’re not allowed to say “good advice!” 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:15 PM
3

I don’t know though, she talks about the guys she dated before we met and they were idiots. Not even misogynists or betas or any of that stuff. The market just, isn’t as competitive as it seems at certain times. You don’t have to win with every woman, you just need to find out what kind of woman you specifically market to. Accurately decide what you are. If you’re a 5, start dating 3’s (doesn’t matter how you meet, OLD or IRL). If you’re a 7 start dating 5’s. Point is *you have to put your ego a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:09 PM
3

When my wife and I got married, I made more than her and had better benefits. Since then, she has passed me pretty good (found a really good fit at a good company and got promoted). She’s a great looking introverted woman. I’m a tall but otherwise mediocre looking salesman of a guy. In theory, she is in a position where she could likely find a doctor and be ten times richer than we are. Literally no one would be surprised if she was married to a doctor. In practice, and I think this is the main …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 09:55 PM
1

You e clearly not heard of the replication crisis. None of these studies, specifically in the social sciences can be replicated. Majority of published science is a worthless circle jerk meant to get grant money for universities. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:12 PM
1

My son had a bully in elementary school. I told him to just not give him any reaction. Move along, try to take a different route than normal etc. obviously if that hadn’t worked I had plans to go further but the bully moved on to a different kid. My son certainly wasn’t a great mark for what you’re saying. Just an ordinary kid and the bully moved on fairly quickly. That’s why I thought maybe it was more about what I posted. My son was undersized in elementary school and the bully was a big kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:10 PM
1

Dang, look at you gals. You nasty! 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:05 PM
1

It’s so easy it’s not being done. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:05 PM
1

It’s a story dude. One that can help people understand a concept. It’s not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:04 PM
1

I’m pretty sure if that was a requirement of a studies relevance we would have no studies to cite on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:15 AM
3

Why does it have to be secular? I think character education is exactly to the kind of thing we should be using religion for. Rather than make religion the head of the table and end all be all of our lives, we should use these powerful stories and messages that have lived on through the years to drive specific parts of our lives. The parts that they’re best equipped to useful in. That was we don’t have to spend all the time trying to figure out all the weirdness of the Old Testament, but instead …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:14 AM
1

What does that mean? Like, females that bully females bang more dudes?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:10 AM
5

I get what you’re saying, but the other side of the coin might be that the bully zeroes in on prey that is least likely to be of a competitive standard. Essentially he’s cooking the books so he always wins the fight. He’s crowing like a rooster. No one remembers his opponent so to speak, just the rousing nature of his victory. I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you and there are probably many specific cases of this or that or other things we haven’t mentioned. Interesting phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:09 AM
1

Would think it would be a lot higher then. The numbers are super close.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 11:45 PM
1

Wouldn’t the guys lie in the opposite direction then?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:01 PM
4

The only thing I would push back, and I’m not even saying I disagree, is that for your friend and the women involved are a tiny sample size out of so many other men and women out there. It’s always possible that your friend (and to an extent you) live near a very niche zone of the culture and for every one of your friend there are literally 999 people that have experienced nothing like that. Just playing devil’s advocate, I probably tend to agree with you, but those stats that have the average p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:59 PM
5

This subreddit is filled with loser guys that think the absolute worst things about women. I have never considered that a woman would make me wait for sex while she’s banging some guy on the side that means nothing to her. Of course OP is the guy having casual sex degradigg no women and cunning on her face. This post is porn fan fic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:46 PM
1

Women aren’t wearing make up for you. They’re wearing make up for that other guy who’s taller and more ripped than you lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:23 PM
0

To be fair, the average women is actually not considered even average until she puts make up on. Any woman that is beautiful without make up is already a 1%’er. Because all the other women are boosting themselves with hair and make up. So by that logic, women have to work harder than men to be average. Nothing you say makes sense when even the slightest bit of scrutiny is applied. For your point to work you have to rely on “facts” that are entirely presupposed. Provide some proof of your foundat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:52 PM
0

Common is rooted in the word “community.” Sonit doesn’t necessarily mean “regularly observed,” but rather “generally accepted by a community.” That’s why common sense differs so much from person to person. I understand it’s semantics but I think that applies here. From a community standpoint, you’re more valuable in your own community than you are in this or that woman’s. In my opinion this is an incredibly insightful perspective to view the whole thing. Sometimes we’re just not a common commodi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 02:37 AM
5

Not how averages work. Far more likely that you register yourself higher on the scale than you actually are. Think about it. What’s more likely? Every woman is wrong? Or just you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 11:52 PM
1

50% of the male population are taller than average. Another probably 25% are going to be close enough. Height doesn’t vary that wildly from person to person in a given geography. The market place is balanced. Supply and demand. Sure, women have an advantage because they’re the gatekeepers evolutionarily, but the people on this sub make it sound like it’s 100 to 1. If you’re struggling in the marketplace one of two things is happening: 1) you’re legitimately unmarketable. This covers extremely ug…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 08:07 PM
1

I disagree. Any unbalance made by the distribution in vitamin T is offset by women doing hair and make up. They doll themselves up, which helps attractive women and also some borderline women, but leaves behind some attractive women and other borderline women who can’t compete at that game. Basically, women created a peacock game for themselves that forces them to incredibly high standards that aren’t always easy to live up to. Men know who beautiful made up women are, but we also know at the sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:47 PM
8

The better looking one is, the more they can get away with in general in life. It’s not a condition of gender. Good looking people are liked more by both men and women. Step 1: be attractive. Am I arguing in bad faith right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:16 PM
7

Unless they’re ugly. Just like with men. So actually it’s the same for everybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:14 PM
2

I think you’re missing the point though. It’s not that we’re soulmates. I agree that doesn’t exist. It’s just that everyone has to settle at some point. We’re never gonna get everything we want from a mate. We have to compromise. With me and my wife, we still have to compromise but we’re compromising much less than we thought we would have to because we have so many little idiosyncratic matches. I agree on the big stuff line finances and how to raise children etc so I wouldn’t have dumped her fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:26 PM
3

I appreciate that! Number 4 is in May! All boys! What have I gotten myself into….? 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:30 AM
8

Yeah I guess my point was that you sound jaded at best and psychotic at worst and that was before you had a boot to the young ladies throat. I’m gonna go ahead and root for you to get the help that you need. Seems unlikely. Good luck though….
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:19 AM
6

Credit to you for taking this whole conversation seriously. I get what you’re saying. My wife and I are a similar match. We both had lots of options. She may have had more options than I did tbh (she’s top level tall skinny blonde looks), but she’s a big introvert who is machine like efficient and falls into this trap where she kinda hates everyone. I’m an extrovert who has fallen off task so many times in my life that I make an adventure out of everything. We’re a really good team. Once we met …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:11 AM
7

I don’t know man, OP sounds ok and you sound rattled. Just saying…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:51 AM
5

The chances of having an autistic kid in your 20’s is 1.5%. The chances of a 40 year old having an autistic kid is 1.58%. How dare a parent even have a child at all with these types of risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 03:05 AM
6

Your link literally says that men who exhibit autistic characteristics could be more likely to have children later in life (as they figure things out and get settled). That could literally be all this is. Entirely made up. “Science” that found an answer to a question using convenience rather than science.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 03:01 AM
6

Screens aren’t that bad. Just gotta keep them in moderation and have some non screen habits. People live to make it sound like society is crumbling but it’s not. If society is crumbling from you’re perspective you obviously have some changes that need to be made in your own life (not you specifically but just anyone who makes these absurd claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:57 AM
3

Or keep improving.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 07:43 PM
4

She could, but more likely she won’t. Once a woman makes up her mind about a mate it’s fairly iron clad. I say this as a regular Joe who has been divorced. It happens but the sheer amount of women I know who have stuck with their regular ass guy makes my experience the outlier imo. If you don’t do something idiotic or become a different person for the worse, she chose you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 04:31 PM
0

It was always bound to be niche though. Most successful guys exhibit successful implementation of the redpill without realizing it so there is nothing to really discuss or dissect. For example, I grew up in a matriarchy. Basically taught (well meaningly) to place women on a pedestal as the de facto leader of the tribe. Many women simply weren’t raised that way so it created some confusion for me on how to behave. I’m also tall and played sports successfully so this kind of balanced out my awkwar…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 03:07 AM
1

Think what you want I guess. It’s not something we’re gonna solve with this discussion. You already know you’re right. I’m good with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 02:48 AM
1

I’m sure it has helped some people. Just not the type of people who would sit around on message boards talking about it. The people that get helped by red-pill tend to leave their Internet forums and go live their lives. There are exceptions of course. I like to hang around here because I’m fascinated by it. I’m not the only one. For the most part though only the dregs keep hanging around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 02:22 AM
1

I don’t disagree with OP’s definitions here, but I would say/add that red pill thinks women are essentially a side kick on a their (man’s) adventure/journey. He needs to get himself right so he can get the fittest possible partner to tag along and help him along the way on the grandest possible adventure. Blue pill man wants to essentially be an admirer of their woman. He’s a tag along on her journey. Constantly appreciating her and showering her with affection. Black pill dudes are the guys tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 12:17 AM
1

I get what you’re saying to a point. I would push back that the red pill can be helpful for certain men, it’s just not some kind of end all be all cure for sexual insignificance. At the base of it, the red pill is just a reminder that woman aren’t our entire life, they’re just a part of it and that a good foundation of hobbies and self care are hugely important to the self worth and health necessary to attract fit mates. There’s no harm in that ideology imo. Obviously this site has really gotten…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 12:06 AM
1

Well, I wasn’t replying to your comment specifically (what was there to reply too, it was just a misunderstanding of my original comment with insults added in). I was replying to the state of the subreddit in general. Which is to say, scared, spiteful men that haven’t been chosen and thus have gotten more scared and spiteful (rather than just, lowering their standards).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 10:26 PM
0

Well right, that’s why I never said it. I didn’t win the genetic lottery either but seemed to be having success that didn’t make sense. The point is that OP put it in words that finally made sense for me specifically. I agree it won’t work for everybody but there’s a couple points to be made, I think a lot of guys here put too much emphasis on age and N count. Throw those numbers out. You don’t have to date a 60 year old woman but you might be surprised to find you can care about someone who is …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 03:47 PM
1

Lol wut…?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:19 AM
6

I live in a city with a population of around 40,000 and was never pressed for dates. I had some slow periods here or there but nothing like what the men on this subreddit talk about. All college educated women with a career focus. Including two doctors that teach at the local university. All exactly what you described. I’m tall but I wouldn’t say I’m a particularly great looking guy. I’m pretty sharp on my feet, I work in sales, but wouldn’t say I’m otherwise much of a catch. Mediocre in every w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:05 PM
4

So I’m this case, OP means the person who started the thread, not you. eonus01. The person lady Lazarus replied to is the OP I was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:42 PM
4

It was a reply to who I replied to. My reply to you would be that you’re a kid. Life can change fast at your age and you might cringe at this post in 6 months if your circumstances change.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:28 PM
0

If you don’t know how to ask female friends to set you up without coming across as creepy, your issue is nothing other than your lack of game. You should be able to have that conversation with them without them realizing they had it at all. Or with them thinking they came up with the idea in the first place. If you can’t handle basic conversationalism you’re in deep doo doo once you actually get to the date. That’s what you need to work on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:24 PM
-1

This is maybe the best take I’ve ever seen on this sub. I couldn’t quite put the words to it as well as you but about 6 year ago I got divorced. Had never used OLD. Dated exclusively this type of woman (I’m nowhere near where you said but these women exist everywhere) until I found a good match and we partnered up. So many times on this subreddit I’ve wanted to give someone the advice “why don’t you just date all those awesome women I dated when I was single!” Obviously that wouldn’t have made m…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:22 PM
2

You probably just need to lower your standards. You are what you match with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:05 PM

Zero chance that’s real. That’s 100% made up by a bored teenager.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:58 PM

You should probably go after that young woman. Just sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:40 PM
3

Yeah they’re great looking women who are smart and funny and generally charismatic. They don’t whine and complain about men not being good enough (at least not that I’ve ever heard. They’re more acquaintances), they’re just, “unlucky at love.” Both are well into their thirties and it’s looking like it’s just not happening for either one. Thus my considering in this moment that they may be asexual rather than just unlucky or high standards. Normally this sub wouldn’t love to hear about women lowe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:33 PM
2

What does hating fruit have to do with being fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:30 PM
1

It seems like they can’t help it. When people are toxic and hateful they can control that, I’m just thinking of the couple beautiful women I e known in my day that are still single. They happen to be super nice and helpful supportive people, but can’t find a guy. It might actually be that they’re asexual in the case I’m talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:53 PM
6

This is exactly it. It doesn’t make them red flags necessarily either. They’re victims of their own high standards. We’ve all known a Stacy who just can’t seem to find a man. She listens to country music and wants the guy from the lyrics. She wants this complete package of a guy that doesn’t exist. It happens to guys too. I feel bad for those people generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:18 PM
-1

You are WAY over estimating how popular these groups are. No one knows what red pill is except the people here. Look around the comments, it’s the same people posting on every thread lol I saw a post on a van dwelling sub I’m subscribed to. The person was asking if the rise of van dwellers was going to ruin the hack of getting an anytime fitness membership just for showering. Everyone was like, “dude. Nobody can dwells. There’s literally dozens of us…”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:47 PM
2

Every man…. Except me, that is… 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 05:33 PM
2

That was the question, yes. I’m guessing the source is your personal difficulty dating. Lower your standards a tad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:27 PM
1

What is your source on this? I see women with short kings every day at the grocery store or my place if employment (I work in retail sales). Is there some data swatch that shows women have walked away from men without height and money? Is it height AND money or just one of the two? Cause while I’m tall (6’6”) I’m far from rich. My last experience dating was as a single guy with two kids and I was kinda swimming in pussy. Could be my bias not realizing what my height did for me, but if anyone ask…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:05 PM
7

I give you credit for fighting the good fight all the way down the chain, but it’s a pointless discussion. There are settlements on both sides in every relationship. This subreddit acts like height and money are the only thing on a woman’s mind. Truth is, no one checks every box for every one of us. We all have to make a compromise eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 12:42 PM
2

What if she doesn’t want 6’2” and a $300k a year paycheck? What if her standards are that a man love Jesus. Are you able to do that? Or is that “not who you are.” It’s not just the material things that force a woman to be in a position to be settling. This sub gets too wrapped up with height and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 12:28 PM
1

Not necessarily. She might feel safe with someone else in charge. She might have a subservient disposition in general. Don’t assume for people what they want. Let people choose to be what they choose. Telling women, “no, you’re not going to be a tradwife, that’s gross. You need to go to school for STEM and have independence!” Is no different than telling her to be barefoot and pregnant. The point is it’s not your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 11:37 AM
1

Right. I’m not advocating for this, just making the point that this is how tradwives operate. It has almost nothing to do with how much they make. I know dudes who are offended if their wife makes more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:54 AM
1

I might not understand the question. Is the answer not “do half the shit around the house and treat others are you would like to be treated?”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 03:15 AM
1

You’re probably right about both points lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:27 PM
1

I don’t really understand your point. What if a man provides $200k a year and his wife works part time and earns $30k of fun money for herself? He’s still providing. If she’s subservient to his rule of household law I think she qualifies as a tradwife.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:26 PM
1

I’m telling you that. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:25 PM
1

The communities that always have, likely still do though. That’s my only point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:25 PM
1

You would argue it’s becoming less common on what grounds? You’re own personal worldview? Well yah, of course you’re not gonna think it’s common if you don’t agree with it but I guarantee it’s more common than you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:50 PM
2

”its bad if men just mean they want the woman to work full time and be a 50/50 girl while also doing the builk of housework and childcare and being available for sex whenever.” Ok… but like… did anyone say that? Or are you just stating a thing you made up that’s bad..?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:48 PM
2

”It’s not complicated” It’s obviously very complicated no matter what type of relationship people have. Complication is inevitable. Stop being smug. Be part of the discussion or leave. That’s what is truly simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:46 PM
1

What if you’re the de facto leader but not the sole provider. I would argue that would still make you a tradhusband. It’s not about the woman having a job. It’s about her being subservient in the marriage. That’s really the only criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:44 PM
2

The truth is, there has been a rise of authoritarian women in western countries. My mom was the dominant player in my household, even with my dad not acting as if he were a subordinate. It’s more that my dad made more money (and worked shift work) which left mom to cooked and cleaned and he the dominant parental figure in the kids lives. If I was bad in school, I wasn’t scared of dad, even though he was literally a cop. I was scared of mom. That’s where the discipline would be coming from. She w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:42 PM

Good for you! That ain’t easy!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 01:18 PM

Oh dang! Respect! That can’t be easy! So like, nothing? Not trying to be crude but I didn’t think people even attempted no sex until marriage anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:44 PM

You’re dating a virgin? Like, right now? And they’re still a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:37 PM

It’s literally the only thing happening here. Every single post.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:35 PM
1

It’s your flair. Am I not allowed to comment on that? Can you tell me more of your little rules to watch out for rather than the actual point. Guys that fuck hundreds of women don’t have little rules and a little creed. They’re just great looking dudes with charisma and generally benefit from healthy relationship habits that maximize their natural gifts. I’m not an anti red pill guy. Red pill stuff works. It’s the correct way to look at the game in most scenarios. You just gotta be careful not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 01:28 AM
1

I said a good guy. Not a “nice guy.” There’s a difference. You missed the point. You’re way too online. The most successful dudes don’t even know what “the red pill” is. They don’t even have to think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 12:46 AM
1

I must have touched a nerve… That was a very defensive response.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 07:42 PM
1

But that’s not a symptom of having hundreds of partners. That’s just the way you are (you’re an asshole). I never said all players aren’t assholes. I just said that being an asshole isn’t necessary to being a player. The ones I met were very much not assholes. But here you are, assuming that because you don’t value sexual partners, that’s the end of the discussion, as if you’re the center of the universe. Aka an asshole. Probably also a virgin knowing this website.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 12:44 AM
4

Nuts, but a good personality 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 02:56 PM
3

That’s not the point of the hypothetical. I think it’s an interesting idea but change OP’s definition of the man (OP is likely a manlet looking to troll women). Instead the guy in the hypothetical is simply whatever you’re perfect man would be you don’t have to be a SAHM. You can be be whatever you want and this dude checks all the boxes and supports you like crazy. Is it worth it to let him discreetly sleep around? The crux of the hypothesis in my mind is when we think of a “cheating spouse” we…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 02:27 PM
2

The reality is that the sexual marketplace is largely won by people who never have to think of it as a marketplace. The people who do think of it like a marketplace have probably already lost. That’s just the numbers. I consider myself a rare case of a guy who was married before Tinder existed and by the time I found myself single again, I had a lot of catching up to do. I approached dating fairly scientifically because there were tools I never could have imagined originally and I had success. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:08 AM
-4

You’re missing my entire point. The player who sleeps with hundreds of women and the woman who does OF can be a variety of different things. They don’t have to think of their partners as children or think of their customers as idiots. I’m fact, I would argue the opposite is likelier to be true. A guy who wants hundreds of partners is far better off if he’s just a good dude who values the women he bangs. This ensures the best possible return on all the investment he makes. Sure, he may be able to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 05:37 PM
4

This is a sad moment for this subreddit. Everyone agreeing to the fatal flaw of the player just to suit a narrative of sexlessness in themselves Why would a guy who sleeps with hundreds of women see them as children? That’s so fucked up! I’ve known several players in my life. Great looking guys with loads of game and women throwing themselves and their friends at them. A better way to put it would be that they looked at women as dance partners. Somebody to spend an evening or weekend of pleasure…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 01:40 PM
2

Couldn’t disagree more. Your friends that sleep with a lot of women are just like that. The condition of control and all that is not mutually exclusive to their sleeping with hundreds of woman. I’ve known multiple men who have slept with hundreds of women and they absolutely loved women. Even the ones with high n count. They looked at it like, “we should probably get to know each other.” In my case, these guys I know’s problem was that they couldn’t stop banging other women. It made settling dow…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 01:33 PM
2

No one said it’s a realistic depiction of anything. The point is that it’s designed from the ground up to hook in women. The show represents what women want and it nailed it on every level. That’s why there are 20 seasons. The post is obviously a little bit of a mess. When I make a rambling rant that I know I’ve made typos in, I might just start putting “sorry for my English, not a native speaker” at the end just to cover my bases. So I don’t have to proof read (who has time for that shit).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 02:12 PM
0

The only answer is lowering your standards. There’s a woman out there for you. You just don’t want her because of your own personal view of yourself. That can change.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 05:13 PM
5

What would people do without you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:55 PM
5

This place produces unintended entertainment in a way few others ever have. You have to wade through some cringe along the way but there’s some hidden gems here. Such as: “why do people go to the bar and enjoy alcohol when it’s bad for you?” Followed by answering every response as if they’re trying to talk everyone out of drinking. Like, wtf? 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 02:22 PM
16

OP doesn’t get laid and also can’t handle the bar scene. So as usual, he wants the bar scene to cease to exist. Because I guess then he’ll be swimming in pussy. This is what r/PPD has become. Anyone who could actually benefit from this subreddit got said help and moved on a long time ago. We’re left with sad dork shit like this. Which, to be fair, I kinda love, in an unintended humor sort of way…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:43 PM
17

What is this, some kind of dork lecture? What’s your point? That you want everyone to stop going to bars just because you don’t like them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:36 PM
5

It makes some sense if a guy is established and is finally looking to settle down and start a family. At that point, the guy is much better off finding a woman who he likes being around. Mutual interests but balancing personality types seems to make the most sense to me. I met my now wife whej I was 35 and she was 30. If she was 25 at the time I still would have married her. I’m an extrovert but can struggle attentionally. She’s an introvert but is big conscientious. I do the talking at the furn…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:29 PM
2

Well, when you put those words in my mouth, I agree, it makes the situation different. I never said that though, so… 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 06:22 PM
1

I never said he did care or should care. My reply wasn’t about feelings at all. It was just about statistics and really valid argumentation more than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 06:20 PM
2

That’s the same thing. You’re just grouping and branding. Your version of just feels more righteous in your own mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:20 PM
2

Some people don’t think it means anything. Some people do. That’s why we discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:15 PM
1

I think your last point is one you’d really love to be true but largely isn’t from my experience. That’s what markets are. Women take men to their friends and family and get them appraised until they have a really solid understanding of the market. If it worked like you say where one man’s 4 could be another man’s 9, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. Shit would be so random. Instead, I have to kind of confirm an inconvenient part of this data (albeit anecdotally of course). I’m a 6’6…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:06 AM
4

Well, it can’t, but it also kinda can. The data just needs to be extrapolated. I mean, what do you think swipes/matches lead to, book clubs?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 03:12 AM
2

I’m fascinated by the way this discussion is unfolding as most of this sub is trash. I’m not sure you can use “80% of women report 1-9 partners,” to mean what you think it does. It definitely could, but it could be a bunch of women with one partner (the lower end of the market) and all the Stacey’s being higher on the scale. When it comes to the rule of 80/20, I think we’re getting a lot of the idea incorrect in this entire discussion. It doesn’t mean that 20% of men are banging all of the top 8…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:47 AM
19

I always understood the rule of 80/20 to mean that 20% of men are banging 80% of women. Not marrying them. Going to the park and looking at pair bonded couples won’t tell you anything about who she banged and tried to land before she settled for the schlub she’s in the park with. I’m not saying I agree with the rule of 80/20, but you have to at least argue correctly if you’re going to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:40 AM
4

I get what you’re saying but I think you’re doing the same thing with “they” in this reply. You’re lumping a bunch of people together and calling them the same thing so from that standpoint, you should be the first person who can see where “they” are coming from. It’s easier to do than you may be realizing atm. The real magic is that yes, there are trends and no, we’re not all beautiful unique snowflakes. That being said men or women aren’t cattle without a unique thought either. It’s all somewh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:37 AM
0

”advocate for yourself as a human” Ok stop. Not everything is about your humanity. Advocate for yourself as a lover I’ll give you, but you’re making it more dramatic then it needs to be. If you wanna get off, take charge and get into the position you need to to make that happen. If the guy doesn’t want to do that he’s not treating you inhumane. He’s just bad/selfish in the sack. Not everything is life and death. We’re talking about getting our rocks off here…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 12:41 PM
-1

We just disagree. I had a lot of success with OLD and met a ton of really cool people that I otherwise wouldn’t have met. It gave me incredible options to find a long term partner to pursue happiness with and most importantly it was convenient and compartmentalized. I think it makes perfect sense to pick up the dating apps and completely put down the idea of finding a partner through work, or the grocery store, or the bar/club (when people are drinking and possibly not themselves). Etc. Getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:12 AM
-1

Based on your stated statistical examples there could be so many reasons other than OLD apps. You’re choosing the narrative you want to be true here. OLD apps do a lot of good too. You don’t have to worry about being a creep in public. Find a few matches, organize a couple dates here and there, get on with your life the rest of the time without having to be stressed out about your dating life. People that aren’t successful in OLD want to go back to the old times so they can find a way to corner …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 01:53 AM
-4

Why would an above average looking guy only have delusional below average women as options? Your game is the problem. You’re telling on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 01:07 AM
-2

This is just not true. You’re talking about what is happening to you and the most vocal men on this sub. I was an average looking dude in his mid 30’s with a couple kids who always had a few matches going. I have no idea how you guys struggle so badly with OLD but to say it’s a mental health issue for everyone involved, is an outright lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 01:03 AM
-1

No offense but it sounds like you’re just bad at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 01:00 AM
4

So you just dated the one woman and stopped? How do you know it wasn’t just that one woman who was annoying? Maybe the next one would have been awesome? No offense but I don’t think that woman had anything to do with it. I think there is more going on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 12:55 AM
28

This subreddit is full of teenagers who haven’t lifted off yet in the dating market. They read about dating and learn these tropes better than they learn how to interact with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 04:55 PM
2

So this has always been my question as it relates to this entire idea: where do we draw the line between it being a business decision completely vs the idea of a man that is good and kind and isn’t going to treat her like shit or leave her being something she is genuinely attracted to? My own anecdotal experience with women is that they “love” their man to a fault. Certainly I have dated calculated women who were looking to climb the latter, I’m not naive to that existing, it just doesn’t seem t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:07 PM
-1

I would argue that being settled for has its advantages too. That means you snagged a woman of higher value then yourself. From a mating perspective that’s the right play. It raises your genetic profile if you have kids but even if you don’t, the behavior is going to look the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 06:42 PM
1

I wonder if the church wedding part of it has to do with standing up on stage so everyone can see how beautiful she is? Nothing against getting dolled up and being seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 10:49 PM
2

I don’t think it’s good choices to transition from being born exclusively a man to being exclusively a woman. Especially a teenager to mid 20’s. I think we should wait until the brain is fully developed to make such a decision (debunked bull shit btw). If the trans community thinks I’m judging them 🤷‍♂️ /s See how fucked up that sounds? Maybe go gatekeep somewhere else. You feel like the star of your own little movie taking place inside your own mind. I know. That’s called your ego. It’s not spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 04:34 AM
4

I just think 19 year old men and women should be able to make their own choices. Whether it’s to change the gender they were born with or deciding who to date. It’s not my job to pass judgement on anyone. But you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 02:41 AM
0

I guarantee you no one cared as much as you think they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 01:08 AM
4

So when does a woman get the right to make decisions for herself? What age specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 01:05 AM
4

I think you’re being a little sanctimonious. Being 27 doesn’t mean you can’t relate to someone 8 years younger than you. Nothing magic happens that makes you a different species in your 20’s. When i was 35 I dated a 21 year old woman. She was extremely mature for her age. Kind of an “old soul” if you will. I was just getting done with a divorce and wasn’t feeling every year of my age at the time. We could have easily lasted long term. We were a great team in a lot of ways (other than me being 6’…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:59 AM
4

OP is using this post as a “survey,” where the data will be futher used as evidence that men are required to initiate sex 90% of times in relationships. This will prove some other narrative around women having it easy and men living shit lives where they’re victims who get taken advantage of at every stop. He goes from answer to answer with these types of replies: “so what you’re saying is, you don’t initiate…”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 11:53 AM
13

You should probably seek the help of a mental professional. This isn’t something this subreddit is going to solve for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 12:51 AM
1

For him it was definitely the excitement factor over impressing a new woman with his craft, combined with an avoidance towards any attachment to them. Keep in mind, by staying with one partner you also need to do all the rest of the boyfriend things. You have to be emotionally available and handle the relationship with value. In his scenario (and I don’t believe I ever had this conversation with him), there’s work to be done either way and the work he did to bed different women was more worth do…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 04:02 PM
2

The only thing I would push back at is the part where self awareness will lead one towards monogamy. I had a friend that slept with hundreds of women in college and I suspect his story is far from uncommon. He treated sex like a performance art. He was a handsome guy, had game, he had the skill set. He would sleep with random women and treat it like a dance where he was the lead. He probably wasn’t the best lay if any woman’s life because as you said, that takes time and mutual understanding. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 03:21 PM
-1

Exactly this. The sweet spot for high libido imo is casual relationships. Long enough to get to know each other and not so long that it gets boring or feelings start to develop. Basically having a couple/few of these relationships means there’s a good chance you’ll be able to find someone in the mood at a given time. This is what TRP would call “spinning plates,” and while I’m not saying I agree or disagree (there are pros and cons to any lifestyle), it’s difficult to argue against the logic for…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 03:12 PM
1

By this logic women should be covered head to toe and forced to stay at home inside all day unless they can be in the company of their “man,” (father or spouse). We wouldn’t want the women to be in danger. That sounds terrible!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 12:34 PM
2

Yeah it’s an ego thing. No one wakes up in the morning and says “it’s a beautiful day today! I’m gonna be egotistical again today just like I am every day!” People who are egotistical think they’re the center of the universe and the last thing they would ever consider is that they’re egotistical.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 05:53 PM
1

No I get it. But Chad doesn’t just hang Stacey. He bangs a bunch of 7’s and 8’s too. He eventually settled on a fellow 10 but those less marketable women have to slink back to their market cap and often it makes more sense for them to settle for a 6 with money as opposed to an 8 working second shift managing the hardware big box store. To be clear, I’m speculating about TRP maxims here not stating personal beliefs. In truth, I think reality is far more complex and chaotic for a theory so simple …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 05:52 PM
3

I think the red pill logic is that hot fit looking women go out and fuck Chad’s until there 28 years old then they find a stable loser to settle down with and raise Chad’s kid with. But they’ll leave their loser if they can find a better one. Something like that. It’s paranoid and insecure but also probably not totally unrealistic so it feeds.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 04:00 PM
3

It make sense if you think about it. People are more likely to talk about this stuff while they’re dating. Every healthy person eventually finds a mate. Thus, we’re left with the perpetually single. I think the worst thing Reddit did was get rid of the red pill and incel. The powers that be at Reddit talk themselves into getting rid of sexist sins as a way to make the site less sexist, but all they do is force the sexist incels into other spaces. They’re not gonna quit complaining on the interne…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 03:57 PM
1

Couple points I would make to support both sides of it and where some of the guys around here are reading a false positive: I’m 6’6”. I got a divorce some years back and found myself back on a market I didn’t understand as well (no tinder before I married). First woman I dated was 5’ flat. She wanted a guy who was taller than her, which was the easiest thing in the world to find. The fact that I was so tall was definitely novel to her. She liked her giant boyfriends giantess but she also just re…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 03:51 PM
1

You have to start lower on the market. You’re not gonna be banging hotties (unless you have a path to improvement that would put you in the A tier of guys, then obviously work towards that but since you’re here, I’m guessing that’s not a possibility. It’s certainly not for all guys). If you’re a 6, you gotta start approaching and dating 4’s. Once you get comfortable with that and start to feel what abundance feels like, you can start having success with 6’s. You’ll even find a few 7’s that have …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 03:37 PM
5

I’m not adding anything to the discussion but I wanted to tell you that this comment is the answer to 90% of posts on this sub. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 03:32 PM
4

I’ve always preferred heavier women. Not like, obese, but midsized for sure. What would technically be considered “overweight” at the doctors office. The kind of woman who has 20 lbs they want to lose to get into single digits size jeans but don’t realize would also make their boobs a cup size smaller. Thing is, I’m not an overweight guy myself. Just a tall, mediocre looking dude with an office bod. Probably 8 year ago I got a divorce. I had been married since before tinder was a thing so I got …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 12:59 PM
1

100%? Really? It could be 85% and still be a very strong indicator of OP’s point but you’re going 100%. Literally not a single instance of a wino cat lady aunt being resentful she didn’t have children. Has never happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 05:48 PM
3

-Make claim about the world of gender relations -Use anecdotal evidence as the sole backing of said claim This entire subreddit in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 05:47 PM
1

I think you are mostly right. My parents never taught me shit about dating so on that part I agree. I have given my son quite a bit of advice on his dating endeavors (he’s 18). Just simple stuff like remembering to represent high value and some of the ways he can do that in specific situations (he asks). That goes for more than just dating though. Respect yourself, take care of yourself (exercise, eat right, take a shower etc), have boundaries, have hobbies, get off your phone are all good healt…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:14 PM
2

You gotta compete. You can’t blame the times. Any man could blame the times for being inconvenient in some ways. Women used to be sold like cattle basically but if you didn’t have the right resume you weren’t even allowed at the auction. It always looks different for each time period but at the end of the day it’s about living in the times you living in and playing the game with the hand you’re dealt. You’ve always had to hustle. That’s life.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:08 PM
3

But how unattractive can someone be, ya know? She answered me and it honestly makes more sense than I could have come up with in my imagination. Bottom line: it’s a combination of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 12:30 AM
4

Not to be all whiny and “women have it easy” but I do find it hard to believe you can’t find intimacy. I find it hard to believe in most men and women tbh. Would you say that it’s an issue of your standards being high (no harm in that btw, everyone should hold out for what they’re worth)? Or do you literally have zero takers? Not picking on you at all. Just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 09:31 PM
1

I think you might be trying to out kick the coverage with regards to your standards. My advise? Date women who are well below your market value. Doesn’t sound like a great idea? Congrats! Now you know how those hotties feel about dating below their market value.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:17 AM
3

devil’s advocate: this is the take of a low value guy who wants his value to be increased by regulating the market (in this case, women’s ability to provide for themselves) rather than responding to the current free market conditions and either A) adjusting his own standards in a mate or B) improving his value to attract a higher value mate (work out, cultivate discipline/value so you’re gf doesn’t hate having sex with you or have to feel like she’s stroking your ego).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:56 PM
1

Honestly, this sounds like the kind of argument a lazy dude would make for why they should have leverage in a marketplace they’re currently not finding much success in. Sure, it would make things easier for guys if women were financially coerced into finding a man or starving on the street, but it might not bring out the best in men to have the cards stacked in their favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:51 PM
1

There’s a part you are missing though. Sometimes this sun and the men who follow TRP look at things in far to generalized ways. I’m all for looking at sex as a marketplace, but you’re connecting dots that don’t make sense here. Having a high income is part of a marketplace for which women choose a man (be it one vs another or one at all), but it’s not the ONLY thing. Women value partnership in non materialistic ways too. There’s more to “standards of living” than just income levels. You’re missi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:49 PM

Yeah I worded that weird. I was thinking sports are a time commitment to be able to play well, riding a motorcycle (notoriously alpha Chad hobby) is fairly dangerous vs just driving a car. Stuff like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 03:13 PM

Men are hornier. Source: evolutionary biology. Women try to pass bull shit laws: that’s not the sexual marketplace but instead politics. Different discussions. It’s not babysitting at all. If you’ve never felt the type of demand you’re reprimanding women for cultivating, then you don’t know A) where they’re coming from and B) how good that shit feels. You’re all mixed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 11:59 PM

I disagree. Outside of the idea that there will always be a little scarcity on the female side. Men are hornier so demand for women is higher than the reverse and that’s the way our species rolls. There’s no such thing as “fairness” in a sexual market place. Things just are the way they are. Mess with a woman who is slightly below your own market value. It’s the best time you’ll ever have with because she’ll be working her hardest to get you. Gotta make our own breaks! The obstacle is in your ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 11:06 PM

What about guys that are in shape but with small arms/shoulders? They’re in shape but won’t do as well on the market as men who are in shape but show stronger with big arms and shoulders? The skinny guy could absolutely be stronger. Same with women. A slim in shape woman can be too slim hipped and broad shoulders. That’s not a great look for them either. You’re over simplifying. Attractive men/women are more attractive than less attractive men/women. That’s about as simple as you can really put …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:55 PM

”If if did these average guys would be dating girls that look like Ariana Grande” Why? Because you say so?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:45 PM

The bottom line, and this is something TRP was spot on about that is often forgotten about by soft unsuccessful men, is that these red flag dudes are often just better looking than their lonelier contemporaries. The truth is, if you or any other guy gets shredded and starts paying more attention to hobbies that exhibit a good deal of commitment, women will likely want to be a part of that adventure. The trick is, it’s easier for some guys to be v/shaped and handsome than it is for others. Some g…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:43 PM
1

Why though? If I’m wrong I’m willing to admit it but you gotta make a single point. Not rely on logical fallacy to make an sarcastic hyperbolic reply that insinuates my error should be self evident.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 07:41 PM
1

I am neither a minority nor a short unattractive (I’m more like, tall and mediocre looking) person. So I can promise you I’m getting it wrong on account of personal bias somewhere along the line. You’re reply is what is known in the logic as “a false dichotomy.” Either short white people have suffered identically to black Americans throughout history or their claim to injustice is completely unwarranted. In reality, it’s much more complex than that. You already know that of course. You’re a bad …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 06:25 PM
1

In a weird way though, this person was defending racial bias as if it’s perfectly acceptable as long as we’re not being traditionally “racist.” While I agree we shouldn’t be racist, we should also simply place less emphasis on race in any way. It just doesn’t matter enough to even think about. Racism or not. I’m not talking about “color blindness” or other such virtue signaling. We have to be sure to end racism that won’t otherwise be ended if we turn a blind eye, I’m talking the effectiveness o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:53 PM
0

That actually sounds amazing to me. I love my mother in law. I get what you’re saying. I was just referring to “their kind”. That felt strange to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:47 PM
6

This is honestly a very interesting debate that no one is engaging in but I really think we will get there some day. People who are short or even a step back “unattractive,” face hardships in life that aren’t dissimilar to the plight of the PoC in the US (and whatever constitutes a minority in other parts of the world. Everyplace has their flavor). We don’t recognize the hardships of unattractive people. Even the most progressive people I know will carve out time to take a shot at a short unattr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 03:21 PM
1

“Their own kind” feels racist to me. We’re all human beings…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 03:16 PM
1

The person you’re responding to posted sources. Do you have any sources for your claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 05:39 PM
1

It’s all good IF people are happier. What I’m wondering is if finding mates based on looks and money is actually creating poor results in marriage. What if we’re better off marrying based on values (and I don’t mean marry someone who is kind). I’ve been married twice. My first wife was a spender and I’m a saver. Opposites attract, right? My now wife is also a saver. The three of us are all very different in many ways, but the anxiety of the financial situation put a lot of strain on my marriage …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 02:33 PM

Jacking off is a terrible replacement for having sex with a woman. The two can’t be compared on the same terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 11:39 AM
4

But it would be fair to say that cultivating abundance is the entire purpose of protecting against what you’re talking about. You needs to have options. A better opportunity (be it a company hiring or a woman on the dating market) will always make the process of finding the right fit smoother.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 10:40 PM
2

To play devils advocate, if the process of hiring is a lot of effort for very little reward, wouldn’t that indicate that the company hiring/compensation isn’t desirable enough to attract top talent?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 10:19 PM
2

I’m not sure that’s true. One thing I might consider: someone assumed you were more sexually active than your are, right (I could be wrong but I thought that is where this started)? Is it possible sole signals are being crossed with men your age and your prescribing the reason as something other than it is? I was on the dating market fairly recently in my mid 30’s (divorced) and dated a few women who were between your age and 40. Every single time I assumed they were more experienced than they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 11:38 PM
1

My wife mows the lawn and rakes leaves and all that shit just as much as I do. She also has to put the higher up Christmas lights up on house… when I’m not home… because I’m too afraid of heights to even know that she’s doing it… 😐
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 07:28 PM
1

Anecdotal example to think about: my wife makes more money than me. I work in retail middle management and she runs HR for a group of assisted living centers. By all accounts hers is the more prestigious job of the two of us by far. We’re both reasonably successful at what we do. Here’s the thing though, she cooks all the meals. Like, all of them. She likes doing it and also, I kinda suck at it. So we just do it this way and it works. I also take the lead on most things from a household standpoi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 07:20 PM
1

My point IS to see people as individuals. Noticing trends made up by individuals isn’t doesn’t make me dense. I think you’re grasping at straws. You’re point is to try to tear down science and society just so you can make everyone the same. Cause you’re scared of what being different might mean. That’s anti-science.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:11 PM
1

But isn’t it always kinda strange how people end up with a good match? You’ll see a good looking couple, ok, makes sense. Then you’ll see a couple who are both overweight or otherwise unkempt. How did those people become attracted to overweight or unkempt people? There has to be some adjustment apparatus within our minds, otherwise the less marketable people would all stay on the sidelines (and I realize some do anyway), but they don’t. They tend to match up with “the best they can do,” and cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:21 PM
1

The vast majority of men on earth including myself are wired for an existence that has changed drastically in the last ten thousand years. If we follow our instincts we’re gonna be in trouble in a lot of ways. I’m just pointing out a possible extra example.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 04:05 PM
1

It’s all in the positioning of it. I know what you’re trying to say. It’s just that you’re not actually saying that. You want gender to be a construct. That makes all the trans people equal in your mind. It also makes them less equipped to handle the world they were thrown into which makes them less than. On the other hand, I think gender is associative with a persons identity at a fundamental level. The percentages hear this out relentlessly (wouldn’t want to be anti science, would we?). The tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:47 PM
1

You don’t know anything about kids. They absolutely gravitate to different things based on gender (for the most part, exceptions absolutely exist and are wonderful when they pop up!). It’s not just parents forcing a narrative on them. If what you’re saying is true, then gender atypical people are broken. They weren’t able to take to the assignment of their gender correctly. Mine is the position that people tend to follow gender norms but we should be accepting of people who don’t quite follow th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:00 PM
1

So that’s absolutely wrong. Here’s an example to show you why: if parents want their little girl to play with Barbie’s and be a “girl” but she rejects that notion and wants to play with microscopes and be a “progressive bastion of gender androgyny” I’m guessing you would advise those parents to let the little girl “be who she is,” right? But here’s the thing. What if the little girl just wants to play with Barbies and be a little girl? Then is it ok to let her “be who she is?” Or do we need to p…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 11:35 AM
1

That’s it? That’s the best you got? People identify with their gender as much as they want to. It doesn’t make them right or wrong as much as their gender impacts the way they turn out. Most little girls like playing Barbies. Most little boys like playing with nerf guns. It’s not as simple as teaching little boys to play with Barbies to have them turn out like girls. Not even close. They are what they are. There are exceptions of course, but for the vast majority of people this is how these thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 11:21 AM
1

We all have to live our lives the best way we can the way they’re presented before us. There’s a lot of advise out there that people shouldn’t take. The point is to consider another perspective once in awhile. It’s good for you. Not incredibly dangerous. Get over yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:49 AM
1

I don’t disagree. I would argue the husbands weren’t up to the task though. If your wife makes more than you, as a man, you have to adjust to that. There are other ways to derive value than making money but becoming an emotional lapdog isn’t one of them. It wasn’t the money that made the women resent the men. It was what the money did to the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:23 AM
1

I get that this is like, the narrative approved thing to say, but you’re so full of shit. Women would be men if we had just raised them that way <facepalm>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:20 AM
1

Im guessing you wouldn’t believe me if I told you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:15 AM
1

Ahh, you’re missing the point though. She’ll treasure you for her entire life if you’re above what market value she can earn out in the field. Women can absolutely be providers. The kind of women who become doctors anyway. Find me a single woman who’s running a successful medical practice and tell her you have a guy for her who cooks, cleans, is involved in the community teaching and coaching young people and I’ll show you the thirstiest woman you’ve ever met. Honestly, I’m that specific scenari…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:02 AM
1

It’s also a good job that frees up a lot of the productivity strain on the husband. Leaving him more time to participate in a variety of extra circular activities such as (but not limited to): being a good dad, being a generally positive role model in the community, etc. Imagine being a teacher, your wife is a doctor, you live in a nice neighborhood even though you make shit money, and you run the local youth baseball league during summer vacation. That’s a rewarding existence. You’ll be able to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 09:58 PM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:12 PM
1

I agree with most of what you’re saying but you’re pushing it at “men pursue women who are bad people because men are led to believe they deserve nothing better.” Men pursue women that are physically attractive. There’s a biological incentive to do this. Fit women are most likely to be top tier child bearers. Women do the same thing with men but it’s geared that little bit more towards being a good provider. Don’t want to get pumped and dumped with a baby to take care of. I agree that women are …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:37 PM
2

Does she really subscribe to it? Like, fully? Or is that just the latest thing she’s doing with herself to waste the time before she finds something better to replace that time with? What’s the difference between a woman who takes a spin on r/FDS vs a woman who tries different brands of yoga pants to see which ones make her ass look the sexiest. We’re all doing it. We’re doing the best we can on the big stuff (diet, exercise, stress reduction etc) and in the time between we’re trying little shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 05:26 PM
2

The magic would be in watching all their shackles break if they thought you could be a good valuable long term. Man, woman, I don’t care who you are, when you are presented with a shot at a long term value proposition higher than what you comfortably come across on the open market, the compromises start instantaneously. The only real advise is: make sure you observe as many compromises in the other person as you feel yourself making. If they’re not making any compromises, you’re cooked.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 04:02 PM
3

I don’t think they realize that’s what they’re doing. For the vast vast majority of men and women they say “ooo, I like that person, I would like to see if that high value person would be interested in me…” Then they cross their fingers and hope the 9/10 guy likes them. The 9/10 guy DOES like them, as luck would have it, and that’s great… until they stop. Then it’s back to the drawing board only to repeat the process again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 09:42 PM
2

It’s a classic scenario we’ve seen play out all to often.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:51 PM

What does that even mean? Take it like a challenge? As if he was only getting a 70% before and just needs to achieve an 89% to get a B+? How would you know you’re better than the ex? You wouldn’t. You’d be begging for dishonesty. That’s not attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:38 AM

The ex left her. He moved on not her. Her odds of getting back with the ex are non existent and she already knows it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:35 AM

You guys aren’t wrong but you’re missing a huge part of it. He didn’t want to stay with her. At the end of the day he was settling too and decided to stop. Once he got turned off by the ex comments he looked at the totality of the relationship and realized the rest of it just wasn’t worth sticking with if he had doubts that she was fully invested sexually (not an insignificant part of a relationship). This couple, in theory, had problems. It’s not all the guys fault or all the woman’s fault. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:32 AM
7

I have two kids from a previous marriage, and my now wife has one. Which one of us is the cuck? Both of us? Is she a bigger cuck because she has more step kids? I’m just trying to get the real issues sorted out here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 10:51 PM
7

A lot of guys are paying their ex-wife’s rent (at least partially) through spousal support. I guess I don’t see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 10:49 PM
1

I think a lot of the time they’re people who haven’t had any luck finding a date at all and are turning to stats and narratives to explain why things haven’t gone the way they “should have.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 06:46 PM
2

I’ll definitely work on that. Good luck out there!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 04:13 PM
1

I certainly don’t think you’re wrong, I think we my just disagree on a few things. Being comfortable staying single is a very virtuous mindset to adopt. It gives you options. Desperation is never a great look. Good luck out there! Good talk!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 04:12 PM

Again though, you’ve got the numbers wrong. Half the marriages end in divorce, sire, but what’s the break down of men initiating the divorce vs women? Let’s just say it’s half (it might not be but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this discussion). Now 25% of marriages end with the woman divorcing the man vs 50% if marriages working. We’re back on statistically, see what I’m saying? The real point is, numbers can’t dictate the way you live your life in this way. There are too many variables.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:29 PM
1

You’re too worried about trying to live a numbers game. Don’t worry about what the stats say. You didn’t observe that women can’t get it out of their system irl. That’s an unobservable phenomenon. Your evidence will be anecdotal at best. Go out and live your life. Keep trp stuff in mind if you want, but just as a general reminder and not as ideological doctrine that needs to be followed rigorously. And the most important part of trp is that you need to improve yourself!. If you’re not doing that…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:19 PM
1

“I’m not dating ugly women” also “attractive women are too promiscuous.” No offense, but I don’t think your market value is nearly as high as you think it should be. If a hot looking woman who has her head screwed on straight was looking for a guy, why would she choose you amongst the other options she has. There are probably a ton of tall, good looking guys who aren’t as hell bent on worrying about her looks and her partner count and just want to have fun and grow and team up. I’m just saying r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:16 PM
1

Maybe you’d standards are too high. No offense, but if you can’t find a looksmatch that hasn’t been promiscuous, you might not be that high value in other ways. Might be worth looking a level or two below your looksmatch level. Just date. Date up the SMV scale. Date down it. Talk to women. Learn about the ways they’re different from you and your buddies. You don’t have to be promiscuous. Just have fun! You might find a situation where a woman you never would have saw yourself with ends up being …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:37 PM
1

It just seems like you have women scored as bad people. You have the worst case scenario happening at a much greater likelihood and you don’t think “getting it out of their system” is a viable option. As if women can’t grow and develop themselves into being better more complete people. I think that’s an incredibly sour take on humanity in general and it’s absolutely not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:32 PM
2

You’re too mixed up in absolutes though. A woman who dabbles in hook up culture isn’t permanently stained somehow. Maybe she tries it and realizes she doesn’t like it and wants to settle down with a nice guy and that’s not gonna happen on a hook up app. Maybe she likes hooking up for a while but long term realizes it hurts her self esteem and she decides to switch to a ltr with a guy who builds her up. There are way too many variables when you start making sweeping generalizations. Trp works onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:25 PM
1

This is actually a pretty gross take by you. Women aren’t cattle. They’re living breathing people just like you and me. Going through life assuming the worst about people (especially women) is more of a reflection of you than it is the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:21 PM
2

I didn’t guess anything about you’re life. We’re talking “in theory” here. What the average Joe out there should do in theory. The woman you dated who had emotional baggage was low value because of the emotional baggage. If you end up with a woman who is a 6 out of 10 in looks but is an absolute blast to be around and loyal and contributes to you being a better person, you’ve won. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:15 PM

Yeah but if they’re hot, fun, and conscientious there’s no reason not to partner up with them. After all, they’re high value. The key is not to be a 1 out of 10 yourself. Hit the gym, go out and do stuff, learn to be an interesting effective person. Sure, you might not end up a Chad Thundercock 10 out of 10, but those guys are only good for sex anyway. You’ll be good for a lot more than just sex (but you can be an effective lover too. Get sexual experience. Maybe it’s not with top tier women but…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:03 PM

I agree. Young women are going to use the apps to fuck the Chad’s. What I’m saying is the apps aren’t going to make there be more or less Chad’s available in the end. Most guys who aren’t top tier SMV might have to settle for a girl who has had it beat up by a few Chad’s in town, but maybe that’s better. Let her have her fun and get it out of her system. The worst case scenario would be that a guy marries this woman and then she finds Chad and cheats on her marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:57 AM

This isn’t logically sound though. Why wouldn’t a man want to be the guy she settled for if he doesn’t even know what she was up to with Chad (does she have to tell him the stories?). I think you might be underestimating the power a long term relationship has on women. As long as their lower SMV husband treats her good and doesn’t completely let himself go, there’s plenty of reason for her to stick with the guy. He doesn’t need to be Chad. He just needs to stay a good version of himself. Divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:52 AM

Why would they he dumb though? Once Becky and Stacy are done with their Chad years, there’s no saying they can’t he perfectly happy in their more secure life with their husband. Hell, they’re husband will be lower in SMV, but he’ll certainly treat them better than Chad did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:48 AM

What is it most women want though? Sex? Or security? Certain the answer is both but I would say security has to be more important than sex, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:46 AM

But I didn’t say 1/10 guys getting attention from the same girls that get with Chad. I specifically said the opposite. You’re making things into extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 09:44 PM

Fair enough. I don’t frequent the sub. I’m more making a point of logic as opposed to truth value.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 09:23 PM
2

That’s also a nonsequitor. The woman who marries Chad Thundercock could end up on that sub if he’s sleeping around or just bored of the woman he settled for. Nothing about this post logically follows that anyone would end up on r/dbr. That’s not what this post is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:49 PM
-1

Why couldn’t lower value guys have lower value women on rotation? The logic works for high value men, shouldn’t it work a tier down for everyone involved? Sure, the lower value guy isn’t gonna spinning dimes, but I guess I don’t see where it falls apart if he stays in his own league. If women filter down to lower value men eventually this whole post kinda becomes a non issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:47 PM
0

But that’s a completely separate issue. Women could do that without Tinder involved. So that’s not really making any kind of point based on the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:45 PM
6

But eventually those women will settle for a lower value guy while the Chad gets new younger girls to rotate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:14 PM
2

But only until the women hit the wall, right? Then, in theory, they’d be right back to settling for the lower value guys (who could, in turn, have lower value women on rotation), right? Worth noting, I’m not agreeing with this sentiment at all. Just following the red pill logic. It doesn’t seem to pan out for me unless I’m missing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:10 PM
-1

But effort does equal results in dating. Provided the effort is aligned properly with the goals. What is the reasoning behind it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:03 PM
9

I’m not disagreeing with you, just curious as a follow up. If women have more efficient access to finding mates, doesn’t that mean the mate they eventually choose ends up off the app too? It makes sense to me that more high value women would be with high value men (as opposed to settling for the less valuable guy from her home town or whatever), but in doing so, she would also free up the slightly lower value woman the Chad in this example would have settled for. Over a long enough time like dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 07:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter