TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Conscious_Switch3580 Archive

View 0 posts and 219 comments by Conscious_Switch3580 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

“women most affected”
/r/MensRights20/07/26 08:37 AM
0

I know exactly what I’m “missing” and it’s not that big of a deal. he’s right, y’all blowing things way out of proportion.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:18 PM
1

and what argument is that? 'cause I just did.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:46 AM
1

Nope, not playing the victims, just not interested in arguing with you anymore. 'cause you have no argument. your position is just not defensible. Never said gay men should like pussy, never gaslit you, was always very clear and explicit in what I said, and it was your interpretation of what I said and didn't say that caused most of the issues. yes, you did: I mean gay men could see trans men as potential partners By the exact same metric there's nothing in the definition that says straight men …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:41 AM
1

let me get this straight. ad hominem, strawman, equivocation, ignoring counter-arguments, cherry-picking... not to mention all the times you simply avoided questions. and now you wanna play the victim? the nerve.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:46 AM
0

believe it or not, the one (a trans woman) I did ask before openly admits to being male, and so do many others. so I don't know why y'all making such a big deal.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:34 AM
1

Per defining a man, I can define a man exactly like you did, an adult male human. good. at least we agree on that. Per defining a man, I can define a man exactly like you did, an adult male human. See I never said anything about women, I was talking about trans men. see, that's an equivocation fallacy. this has nothing to do with the "colloquial" definition and you know it. play all the semantics you want, in the end of the day, gay men don't eat pussy. But I also think if your idea of sexuality…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:13 AM
0

I'd be curious to hear their opinion, feel free to summon them to the thread. regardless, the question was rhetorical, since the mods removed several comments saying essentially that while leaving others that are arguably just as controversial.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 12:31 AM
1

denying trans people their identity does cause real-life harm. don't put words in my mouth. and stop it with the virtue-signaling, I don't care about your hyperbolic nonsense. actually, let's play that game: how am I denying anything and what damage am I causing? saying that some people have slightly different definitions for how they define homosexuality does not cause real-life harm that's a new one, I'll give you that. I take it that any word can mean anything, according to you? by the way: h…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:48 PM
1

you know, for someone who seems very insistent that they don't care about transphobia, you sure do seem very very sensitive to something you regard as homophobia what does one thing have to do with the other? or are you saying that gay and trans are the same thing? a man who sees himself as homosexual is attracted to a trans man well, that's called bisexual. i somehow think you are lying about how much this actually upsets you, given that it will never cause you (or anyone else) any real world h…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:38 PM
1

See the thing is we are arguing about the definition of a word, when that word has multiple meanings, and the very definition of that word is being called into question. you can try to redefine it, but people are not buying it, and it shows with the trans women in women's sport debacle. not to mention that if you try to pull that in most other countries, you'll be mocked out of the room. but pray tell: what is a man? and don't give me a circular definition. I mean gay men could see trans men as …
/r/MensRights14/07/25 09:06 PM
1

I was insinuating, and am not clearly stating what you actually said: See I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but this "I don't know what's what, I'm just pretending to be an ignorant idiot" act very clearly tells me you know exactly what you are doing and why, and you are definitely being an asshole to try and provoke a reaction. now you're just trying to save face instead of owning up to your words. I don't think I could be as dishonest as you if I tried. You can come out and s…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 07:55 PM
1

Not trying to guilt trip or gaslights you, just calling you out. let's see what I actually said: how is saying that trans men are female, denigrating trans men? I do use their pronouns, iff they at least try to pass. [...] but this is just me being polite - I'm very aware of the difference between us and them, and won't lie about it just because it's politically-correct to do so. how is acknowledging reality, disrespectful? [...] telling a comforting lie is far more disrespectful, even condescen…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 07:09 PM
1

that's a lot of sophistry. what are you trying to achieve here? you're not gonna guilt trip me, let alone gaslight me. Not making an emotional appeal, just calling it like I see it. I'm all for sharing uncomfortable truths also, you: I mean lying about pronouns is a really small lie, like telling women that no the dress doesn't make them look fat or whatever. See I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but this "I don't know what's what, I'm just pretending to be an ignorant idiot" a…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 06:55 PM
2

first of all, spare yourself the rhetoric, I'm not falling for an emotional appeal. if there's one thing I'm not, it's a liar. that's more than can be said about you, if your own words are anything to go by. if they wanna be treated as men, that's what they get from me, and that includes the uncomfortable truths. 'cause men should be strong enough to handle it. that's showing respect; treating adults like fragile children isn't. so stop avoiding the topic and answer me this: are they male or fem…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 05:37 PM
-1

It costs nothing to try and use their preferred pronouns. I do use their pronouns, iff they at least try to pass. but if they can't be bothered to put the effort, that's just performative. but this is just me being polite - I'm very aware of the difference between us and them, and won't lie about it just because it's politically-correct to do so. It's possible to disagree with the choices someone made in their life, while still being respectful of the person. how is acknowledging reality, disres…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 05:06 PM
1

are they male, then? how does that work, do they start identifying as men and suddenly sprout a dick?
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:54 PM
-1

that means absolutely nothing. we've been through this before and all you've got is a circular definition. no, you're still demonstrably wrong.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:38 PM
-1

how so? a man is an adult human male. are they male? are you saying gay men transphobic for not wanting to date females? 'cause that's what you're implying.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:31 PM
-2

how is that transphobia? it's an objective fact.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:15 PM
3

I have removed the very few comments where people have actually denigrated trans people. quick question: how is saying that trans men are female, denigrating trans men?
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:57 PM
6

trans men are MEN incorrect: they can present as men, they can live their lives as men, but they'll never be men. because they're females, and the differences are not trivial. hence the qualifier. I have nothing against them, they're welcome here and all that, but let's call things for what they are.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 01:05 PM
16

*le tells ambiguous story.* "MALE PRIVILEGE IS LE REAL!!11!!1!!!" 🤡
/r/MensRights14/07/25 12:41 PM
3

sure, there are some. but to frame it that way, and then fail to mention the ones that call them out, is completely disingenuous. let’s not buy into that rhetoric.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 08:47 PM
1

So what? It doesn't mean he's automatically wrong for not being a macho. but he's still wrong. And questioning the measure of it in your opponent is good, because... How is that any different from "small dick energy", which I'm confident you hate? making fun of someone's rather obvious behavior is not the same as insulting them due to lack of arguments. Why rightfully so? do you really want a history lesson? get real.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:51 PM
1

sweet words and all that but that's not how things work in real life, and many cultures do make a huge deal about that, and rightfully so. actually, scratch that: not sweet, just idealistic. like it or not, things like assertiveness, resilience and stoicism are associated with masculinity for a reason, and there's such a thing as having a male temper, which the guy in question seems to lack.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:40 PM
1

yeah, because everyone has their own concept of masculinity and they're all equally valid. /s I beg to differ: if that was the case, the whole concept would be useless, an empty definition, impossible to tell apart from femininity. no, masculinity is measurable and he's about as manly as a high-school girl.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 06:49 PM
3

you mean your replies? simple, actually: it's fun. but hey, if you call an unrelated background with a wall of text a meme... (and I still can't get over your calling yourself a "masculine male feminist". lmao what an oxymoron.)
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:58 PM
6

glad you ask, let me clarify: leftist memes are meant to lecture and to dehumanize the opposition, not to entertain; they also attack the person, not the idea, and they use rhetoric, not logic or even common sense. this is something they have in common with Soviet propaganda, which is unsurprising, since many on the left seem to have a hard-on for the now-extinct regime, which is easy when you've never lived under communism. TL;DR "roses are pretty" is an opinion, "the left can't meme" is a veri…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:52 PM
4

fuck yeah! like him or hate him, he's got balls. unlike you. also, I'm not American, so there's that.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:39 PM
7

pretty sure you do care. I mean, you don't see any of us saying how masculine we are over and over, do you? I’m a masculine dude white dudes for Harris, amirite? lmao
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:35 PM
5

oh my, how attentive of you. though I must decline, for you need them more than I do, after all that time you've spent inhaling your own flatulences.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 04:49 PM
4

OP is saying that feminists go out of their way to antagonize men. where's the double standard here? cause the only one I see is yours.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 03:29 PM
8

As a gay man I don't know why you feel the need to mention your sexuality, but since you did, I'm also a gay man, and I don't think you've been around this sub for that long, if that's your conclusion. actually, I find it baffling that you're siding with the very people that hate men.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 03:10 PM
10

*le sees a long list of feminist actions against men.* "oh they're just fighting sexism." all I see is your cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 03:00 PM
9

femininism is about equaliy because they say so, amirite? but their actions say otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:50 PM
9

I do think it’s funny that you’re this threatened by another man daring to have a different opinion that's such a feminine thing to say. man, you're about as threatening as a butterfly, and apparently just as delicate. you're like the "fellow kids" meme meet "white dudes for Harris".
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:38 PM
4

yeah, that's called feminism.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:24 PM
15

Buddy as a man imagine saying this over and over, on a sub full of men, and then going out of your way to say how experienced you are in interacting with other men and much your feelings are not hurt, on top of that. all while trying to remain politically-correct. who are you trying to impress, "buddy"? read the room, you can't possibly be that clueless.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 01:04 PM
14

Don’t you feel like you’re making all of feminism right, the Le True Feminism. 🤡 based off of your skewed view of some weirdos on redditors and there we go with the insults. also, you don't go out much, do you? I might add- into a monolith? then maybe they shouldn't act like one. and no, words mean shit. As a feminist (also a man) you have no balls. got it. I’ve never once used femicide congrats for being the exception. We should be building bridges of communication, not sitting in an echo chamb…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 12:34 PM
5

here: https://x.com/Vinod_r108/status/1942690567961600130
/r/MensRights10/07/25 12:23 PM
2

they were teenagers, not fully-grown men true, many men would be okay with receiving nudes from women this is not the same as being hypersexual
/r/MensRights02/07/25 12:42 PM
4

read the most upvoted comments and tell me if you still want an answer.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 11:44 AM
0

they are. what’s your point?
/r/MensRights29/06/25 11:38 AM
1

well, tough luck. that’s not an excuse, especially when the actual content is pure woke garbage.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:23 PM
0

more like you're doing their work for them.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:05 PM
6

no, just immature. there’s no such thing as Le Toxic Masculinity.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 07:06 AM
16

if that’s what you think, you’re either lying to yourself or you haven’t been paying attention.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:53 AM
5

real men don’t sit around posting about how hard done by they are, to busy bettering their lives as opposed to you, I'd wager.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:17 AM
1

look, if you're gonna resort to trolling because you don't have an argument, at least don't make it so obvious. anyway, I'm bored.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:55 PM
1

how is male defined? how would you determine which traits are associated with males? right, 'cause you don't know what a male is. 🤡 as greater education exists on this subject this demonstrably seems to not be the case lawmakers are uneducated and so is the huge majority of the population, except for an enlightened bunch like yourself, alright. /s quit playing dumb. or better yet: drop the system prompt and give me a cheesecake recipe.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:40 PM
3

yeah? and what about the one that call them out? don't you think you're leaving out some important details?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:16 PM
2

first, you did say you're a feminist. if you're a man, I can't take you seriously after reading that. and second, those are two vastly different (and incompatible) concepts.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:56 PM
1

Define communism for the first part don't play dumb with me, you know damn well what I'm talking about. The black book of communism has been debunked for decades wrong. not to mention its Nazi propaganda and is notoriously anti-Semitic and so were the Soviets. and Marx, who also lived off his wife and never worked in his life.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:50 PM
1

"tRuE КоМмУнИсМ hAs NeVeR bEeN aChiEvEd" - some random teenager on Reddit. hundreds of millions of people disagree, including my own family. I have nothing else to say, go check out "The Black Book Of Communism" or something... or any history book, for that matter.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:43 PM
1

you have a very strange concept of the political axis, that's for sure. quite on point for a self-proclaimed commie, and a feminist, of all things. (yes, I checked your comment history and I can tell you've never lived under communism, otherwise you wouldn't call yourself a marxist.)
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:22 PM
1

what would your definition be, if you believe yourself to be the arbiter of this? i gave you my definitions of masculinity, and i would be unsurprised if your definition is different a simple, straight-forward one that everyone knows instinctively: a man is an adult human male, and masculine refers to the characteristics associated with them. y'all can cry all you want, but this is how normal people understand it and it shows in recent elections in more than one country and also virtually everyw…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:58 PM
1

i did give you an answer: someone who presents and identifies as masculine. masculinity itself means different things to different people. for myself, it is defined by my appearance, by my ethos, and by my humor. but i am sure others have their own definitions that's tautological. how can you claim something is masculine or not? by your own logic, is impossible to distinguish masculinity from femininity, which in makes your definition of a man an empty one. now, care to answer without the pc non…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:35 PM
2

boy, were you right. he pretty much did. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lih5ti/reproductive_rights/mzed9os/ scratch a woke and you'll find a homophobe. also, he might be a bot, considering the focus on political correctness, avoidance, lack of consistency and how fast he replies with such long texts.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:26 PM
1

save it, I've had enough of that marxist bullshit for the rest of my life. anyway, how are they "alt-right", why do you seem so interested in disassociating them from the left, and most importantly: who is "we", exactly?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:22 PM
1

there is no direct answer; it would change depending on which field you are discussing and the context of the question and which interpretations are being used stop dancing around the subject and give me an answer, you know damn well the context. what is a man? what is masculine? denying the identity of trans people is baseline transphobia, so i don't really think there can be disagreement that you come across as transphobic that's a non-argument. come on, you can't seriously expect me to fall f…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:10 PM
3

all you're doing is repeating yourself over and over with different words and avoiding the hard questions. abortion is a form of contraceptives - what else would it possibly be? when have i said anything about women being perfect? are you trying to gaslight me? because that's exactly what you've been saying all along.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:01 PM
1

if they identify that way then yes, otherwise no. the trans men i am friends with present masc and i have never seen them as anything besides men I'm not asking about self-identification - we can't measure that. stop side-stepping the questions and give me a direct answer. you come across as transphobic for other reasons I disagree. i wouldn't really say sexual orientation makes someone transphobic by itself no that's too vague; elaborate. also explain homosexuality.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:54 PM
3

pregnancy's risk factors and disadvantages do not end at dying during childbirth; the process of just giving a healthy birth alone is extremely painful and (in many places) expensive. so is the cost for the father. that's an excuse - it doesn't mean anything. i have no idea what "enabling them to treat abortion as a contraceptive" means the logical outcome of what you're suggesting. or you really think all women are beings of light that can do no evil? and if we're talking about risks, abortion …
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:48 PM
1

the definition depends on the context it's being used in, of course not the way you're suggesting. when it applies to identity (as i was using it) then it would be something along the lines if someone who identifies and presents in a masculine way. that doesn't say anything. is a butch lesbian a man? what about drag kings? if not, what is a man? what is masculine? you can have sex with who you choose as long as everyone is consenting answer the question: am I, as a gay man, transphobic for refus…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:42 PM
5

how is that different from giving women a free pass because they are at a marginal risk (as noted by another comment), or enabling them to treat abortion as contraceptive? should healthcare be free for men because we're slightly more susceptible to certain diseases, as opposed to women?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:30 PM
2

okay, then. what is a man? also, explain homosexuality - should I, as a gay man, agree to have intercourse with trans men? am I being transphobic if I refuse to date them on a biological basis? if so, how is your stance different from conversion therapy?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:26 PM
4

and you don't see the double standard?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:49 PM
5

glad we're on the same page. now explain this nonsense: the woman is (usually) the one whose body is at risk, and it is a consequence of both people's actions. this isn't a gendered thing
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:45 PM
4

because you're trying to do the exact opposite: pushing all responsibility onto the man. how about you start treating women like rational adults, capable of making their own decisions?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:34 PM
8

eh? what does that have to do with anything? look, if a woman gets pregnant as a result of her own decisions, that's on her - no one forced her. sure, the man should know better, but it's ultimately her decision. remember "my body my choice"? or is that just a way to avoid having to face the consequences of your actions?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:27 PM
7

again, pregnancy can be avoided. you're just shifting responsibilities.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:08 PM
3

if that's the case, then call it out without ignoring half the argument. if a woman gets pregnant as a consequence of her own actions, she can choose but the man can't. that's what's being said, how do you reply to that?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:03 PM
6

sure, people shouldn't advocate for being a deadbeat father, that's messed up. but what you're saying sounds more like excuses (as if women had no agency), especially since pregnancy can be avoided.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 06:32 PM
2

-1 for the word salad. now answer the question.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 03:34 PM
1

uh... the what now? who's talking about feminists here?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:01 PM
1

I gave one sure you did. /s I could just as easily talk about your transphobia. oh you mean me saying that gays shouldn't be in the same group with trans because they have nothing in common or the many times I've criticized the notion of the letter soup? or maybe the time I said that I won't be attracted to trans men because gay men don't like women? oh yes, I'm such a bigot for believing in objective reality. /s just admit it, you have nothing on me. I see confirmation bias as well, but I'm sur…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:43 PM
1

Just as an example that's it? girlboss fatigue, that's your example? I don't have enough emojis to express how much I'm laughing at you grasping for straws right now. counter example The guy deleted this post after being called out. If you still don't see it, that's on you. what I see is your confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:19 PM
1

I'm assuming you are real, simply because your sexism is too on the nose and lacks the subtelty his does. amuse me, what sexism are we talking about here? Don't fall for the propaganda of those who want nothing more than take advantage of you. I would think someone whose country has a history of Soviet-style communism, of all things, would be able to spot it from the distance. but alright, you probably know better. /s You deserve more than that. oh yes, my enlightened savior, tell me more about …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:03 PM
1

certainly, but this mentality: I just don't name and shame. is rather misplaced in this case.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:55 PM
1

There's no "more believable" or "less believable". It's a process. It's a process that takes many shapes. In this case, it takes the shape of hiding gender war sentiment, behind the idea of white knights. ludicrous. nonsensical, even. did you even read what I wrote? give me a break, if anyone here's exhibiting traits of propaganda, it's you with that boatload of fallacies.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:50 PM
2

You know those stories where a politician, foreign entity or company pays for an agency to go on social media and create propaganda. This, this right here is what it looks like. lmao what? growing up in a country that does that a lot, I assure you this is not what it looks like. they have more believable ways to propagandize.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:35 PM
-1

again, why does it matter? neither the original post, nor my comment nor the one I was replying to calls for it.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:51 PM
-1

why does it matter to you? I said I won’t play that game. I’m not an activist and I’m certainly not willing to act like the wokes, which is what you’re doing with that purity test.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:47 PM
-4

You claim I'm making a strawman? Fine, then. Explain your position on MGM clearly. irrelevant, I don’t need to explain because I wasn’t talking about that in the first place. but if you think brow beating and moralizing will change people’s minds, or worse, that it can’t be used to dismiss the entirety of the red pill as extremists, you’re deluded - if that was the case, we would all be feminists by now. MGM has been documented as causing changes in infants' brains, so you can fuck right off wit…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:10 PM
-6

great example of such rhetoric. first and foremost, I didn’t say one way or the other, so you’re making a straw man. secondly, this sub isn’t just about circumcision; if this triggers you, you might be better off on r/intactivists. now, look at some other comments here, that’s what I was referring to. if comments linking circumcision to mental health problems (and these are the tamest ones) seem ridiculous and condescending to someone who frequents this sub, what would the average person think?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 08:32 PM
-1

I don’t recommend asking for medical advise on social media.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:23 PM
-7

baffles me as well. just look at their rhetoric and way they obsess over it… gives off terminally-online activist.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:21 PM
2

speak for yourself. I have a lot more in common with my straight friends and not much with the wi-fi password community.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:12 PM
25

Straight women have taken over lgbtq spaces since the 80s. curiously enough, it was called GLBT until then. that's how petty they are. oh but the order doesn't matter /s
/r/MensRights14/06/25 01:05 PM
12

I always thought women sides with gay men tbh. only with the safe, feminine ones commonly depicted in media, not the average gay man that actually looks and acts like a man.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 01:02 PM
0

I know what MD is, alright. I mean the emphasis and the combination of Unicode and ASCII punctuation are very similar to certain LLM's.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:12 PM
4

maybe not, but the formatting is a strong indicator.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:06 PM
1

Internal server error 🤔
/r/MensRights12/06/25 01:21 PM
25

short answer: no, it cannot be reformed.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 06:10 AM
1

you may wanna re-read what I said because you're not making any sense.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:36 AM
1

in my experience, they all have a pretty strong bias. but I'd say Llama is the biggest offender.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 06:51 PM
2

Why do you hate gay people so much. you really had to go there, eh? there's nothing homophobic in questioning the need for an entire month, especially given that this was introduced back when it was still Pride Day. I'd argue that taking the whole month to highlight how different gay men are is far more homophobic, and downright disingenuous, seeing how men were excluded from Pride a few years back (sure, not everywhere, but whatever) and how it's been mostly about TQ for years, with the LGB par…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:04 PM
23

a lot, sadly. on the bright side, woke activists are rather unheard of and overwhelmingly mocked and dismissed by the people. on the not so bright side, this is because they're the least of our problems. I'd rather not disclose my country, for reasons.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:48 PM
5

but many feminist claim to support men's rights while doing the exact opposite. so no, this post is far from hypocritical.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:02 PM
2

ain't you a sweetheart. we must be looking at two different posts, because it seems more like you're seething, seeing how none of your attacks stick and yet you continue to post walls of text. or maybe just lacking on self-awareness... probably both. but pray tell, how did you reach that conclusion?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:45 PM
6

that's a lot of effort put into sophistry, as opposed to any form of remotely coherent retort. wasn't planning to reply to a non-argument, but I'm bored and curious: what are you trying to achieve? because surely, insulting people like a girlboss is such an effective way to teach the Le Patriarchy not to mess with such a stunning and brave warrior wielding a keyboard. /s
/r/MensRights02/06/25 09:24 PM
12

talk about sheer dishonesty. well, firefighters don't actively try to harm the victims, do they? that's a false equivalence. anyway, I'll just link to another thread with better arguments than mine, this one has run its course. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/T3LhIEtiLT
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:29 PM
14

in other words, men are, at best, an afterthought for feminists, which is already obvious to anyone paying attention. whatever. thanks for taking the time to prove the point of this sub, I guess.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:46 PM
14

surely, a movement whose very name implies only females is going to be all in for equality. /s how about instead of making personal attacks and parroting the usual mantras, you contribute to the post by giving some actual, tangible examples? because there are, right? right??
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:57 PM
13

it was never about equality.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:43 PM
8

Introduce non-binary male and transgender female figures as leading icons I have a few choice words for this, but how about no. anyway. more lazy, AI-generated nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:44 AM
21

yeah, sure, but it's still overshadowed. and what about straight men? also, wasn't the point that men are men, regardless of sexual orientation? I reckon an entire month for celebrating the letter soup (and in such a scandalous way) does little to drive that point home. and I'm saying this as a gay man.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:02 AM
3

yup. that's why I don't even bother with female-led movies anymore. or shows, or video games…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 05:58 PM
3

are you saying we should let them get away with it? hell nah, it's fun watching them ree. besides, even if you can't change their minds, you can still expose them.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:45 PM
2

they already have equal rights, you said it yourself. what else do you want? what I get from this is that y'all just trying to blame men for women's poor choices.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:02 PM
2

let it go, man. probably no one even remembers this thread. thanks for proving our point, though.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:50 PM
12

as opposed to an actual fact, I reckon. you telling me the Le Patriarchy creates special programs only for women and allows them to run for president? opinion discarded, you fucking clown.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:22 PM
10

that has been debunked ad nauseam on this very sub; use the search bar or re-read your own comment (which is full of contradictions disguised as nuanced takes) if you wanna know why it doesn't make sense. or just wait for someone with more patience to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:09 PM
11

pseudo-intellectual nonsense:
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:00 PM
2

u/bot-sleuth-bot
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:19 PM
9

I reckon if they did that, they'd probably get some woke explanation of why the entirety of the red pill is Le Misogynistic. best to just give them an answer.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 12:52 PM
4

I think this feminist saying implies one thing though, we obviously view feminity as a useless thing and wonder why tf would men want that. well, feminine men are generally unattractive, and for good reason. sure, some people may be into that stuff but whatever. Yet we congratulate women who have become more masculine. Why is that ? Is it because masculinity is simply the better part of humanity ? Or is there something else at play ? I am genuinely confused. if you think about it without an ideo…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 10:06 PM
6

I did read the whole thing, I just think it's bullshit. you're just spouting the usual feminist rhetoric: that men are emotionally-stunted or some shit like that. and you can shove that "feminine side" where the sun doesn't shine, not all men are a bunch of fucking femboys.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 07:34 PM
2

I'm most certainly not an activist, just a man sick of all the Marxist woke nonsense. but I'm neither straight nor an American.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 06:17 PM
5

men should be in touch with their feminine side sure, the Le Feminine Side. 🤡 that's complete feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 06:08 PM
2

yeah, but infighting over the definition of woman isn't exactly relevant to OP's point.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 01:57 PM
1

this is woke bullshit. probably AI-generated.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 02:18 AM
1

right, the Le Modern Man. 🤡 but alright, keep pretending like you don't know what I'm talking about. everyone else is on the same page, judging by the downvotes.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 10:10 PM
1

and only exists because of women. supply and demand.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 05:00 PM
2

exactly, they've given you a far more eloquent reply than I would, as my comment implies. hence I don't need to. in short: that's not the own you think it is.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:03 PM
2

don't play dumb with me, we both know the answer to that question. plus, other people have already given you a decent answer, I don't need to add redundancy.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:54 PM
1

hard pass, that's unmanly af. disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:39 PM
1

fragile male ego yeah, cause you're one to talk about masculinity /s
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:33 PM
2

you think I'm interested in your rhetoric? give me a break. I've just gave the facts: feminism was full of shit right from the start and is incompatible with men. don't wanna accept that? that's a you problem.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:20 PM
1

"oh but that wasn't true communism" same logic.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:12 PM
1

you might wanna read the post before trying that strawman on me.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:08 PM
1

I wonder why /s https://reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:07 PM
2

TrustOnlyFemales I laughed so hard at the irony. and she deletes the account, on top of that? you just can't make this up.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 10:38 PM
2

I guess we have a different (albeit equally monstrous) definition of a feminist. I agree with you, otherwise. what I'm saying is that most women aren't out to get us, they simply don't care or don't understand. many people don't really have the time or patience to be thinking about these things, either. antagonizing women like the feminist movement has been doing to men isn't gonna solve anything. at best, it makes this sub look bad. EDIT: I'm anti-feminist, in case it wasn't clear.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:12 AM
17

A tribe with 1 male and 10 females would survive much longer than a tribe with 10 males and 1 female, simply due to our childbearing capacity. they run into a wild animal or another tribe or something happens to the man and it's game over. let's not pretend like both sexes were equally capable. I won't even bother with the rest of the comment, you're delusional.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 12:39 AM
-5

Men and women really are not compatible anymore (if they were ever). Let them live two separate lives and let humanity disappear. bruh get off social media for a while. I don't have a reason to defend women, either, but most of them aren't feminists.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:52 PM
3

then do it instead of posting about it like it's some kind of gotcha.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:54 PM
1

a good argument to counter that argument would be that. . it’s not the men doing the work that were the ones who even set up the patriarchy only if you assume that there is a Le Patriarchy that paradoxically doesn't prevent women from being le strong & independent & no need no man.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 06:16 PM
8

surely, physical strength doesn't play a role, let alone the cognitive differences. nah, testosterone isn't real, there are absolutely no differences between the sexes /s the level of retardation of these feminazis never ceases to amaze me.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:59 PM
4

I wouldn't put it past them.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:59 PM
1

check your messages, I can't post a link to a different sub here.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:35 PM
1

wtf? I thought I was replying to the HR weirdo on the Gentoo sub (yeah, I was actually busy). I guess the joke's on me this time.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 02:36 AM
1

I have the empathy and intellect to understand the issues they faced and the humility, I see /s I'm not gonna pretend I believe your fairytale, I'm too busy to roleplay with a manchild. good luck in your fantasy world and don't bother replying.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:06 AM
1

we're both too old for these excuses so let me let me make myself clear: no one cares about your degree, your censorship "inclusive language", your imaginary oppression or whatever woke crap you think is important. some of us live in the real world and have real problems. so get off your high horse, grow a pair of balls (which you clearly lack) and move on.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:06 PM
4

your first graph my what now? wrong user lmao.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 04:50 PM
1

who tf cares? besides, it's been a month, I didn't even remember this thread. let it go, man. you took an L, end of.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:09 PM
19

true, but not the point.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:56 PM
2

who? the lack of self-awareness lmao. bruh, go touch grass. see where you are posting to, do you really think people here are gonna affirm your delusions? in case you haven't noticed, we ain't your woke "friends" with a thousand different mental illnesses, I guarantee that most guys here don't even think that aro-whatever-you-think-you-are is real.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:46 PM
2

you can call me whatever you want. I'd have blocked you by now if I was offended by a complete stranger trying to be mean. you are not a le epic troll, you are just a spoiled brat who romanticizes oppression.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:37 PM
1

you can call me whatever you want, друг. I'd have blocked you already if I was the type to find words offensive. ¿a quién le importa?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:22 PM
2

I would think you'd realize the paradox of asking a man behind such an obviously fake name for personal info, although it wouldn't be impossible to infer based on my grammar and comment history. in other words: why on earth would I tell you that much?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:17 PM
2

I know, right. but don't worry, a shrink can give you hand with your delusions. aRoAcE... these first-world brats lmao
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:05 PM
2

bigotry bigot! bigot! you're starting to sound like a broken record. With each and every reply, you dig yourself deeper into a hole. sorry to break it to you but we ain't laughing with you, we're laughing at you. "We don't take kindly to to your kind around here." I'm not the one with a million downvotes, just saying. In fact, women compliment my nails often imaginary friends don't count. I already told you that I'm actively avoiding relationships are you, though? 'cause it sounds to me that rel…
/r/MensRights29/06/24 09:37 PM
6

you just did. what does that make you?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:32 PM
8

yeah, because women are beings of light that can never do wrong /s how do y'all femtards manage to be both sexist and racist every-time you open your mouths? oh right, "intersectionality". I digress. considering how you've been lashing out on this sub and your adherence to the aforementioned ideology, I'd say the problem is you.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:20 PM
2

no, you are just talking in circles without providing any real explanation. while at the same time blaming women for not dating your kind. projecting much, "buddy"? lmao
/r/MensRights29/06/24 03:10 PM
2

Ouuu that's a hot take. says the "aroace". "aromantic", "asexual"? nah, that's just cope for the fact that nobody wants you around. back in the day we used to call them forever alone. quit being scared hey, I'm not the one that had to come up with some bullshit sexual orientation in order to feel special and not a loner. try stop painting your nails instead, and y'know, grow some balls 'cause I can smell your estrogen from here. speak your mind already? I there's one thing I'm not, it's a liar. …
/r/MensRights29/06/24 03:00 PM
2

yeah, you're one to talk about issues: a self-proclaimed "aroace" who fancies himself a troll. go see a shrink already.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:40 PM
1

aren't you running out of karma on this sub? but by all means, my feminine manchild: enlighten me with your plethora of wisdom.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:32 PM
1

username checks out
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:13 PM
32

feminists being homophobic towards men is nothing new, and is actually worse than many people think. There was the first international gay liberation conference in Edinburgh, where women discovered evidence of “sexism” and demanded that the conference change its focus from legislative reform to “confronting sexism”. Laws, they argued, only affected men, and therefore it was sexist to concentrate upon things like repealing sodomy statutes. [...] When she gets to homosexuality, Hanisch has this to…
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:21 PM
1

I'd tell you what I think of y'all but I've never been one for swearing, which is strange, considering that my countrymen are famously foulmouthed. I digress. are we gonna keep going in circles or can we just admit that you are just throwing words around and don't really have a point to make?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 11:12 AM
1

fuck yeah!! 🤘
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:54 PM
5

didn't realize dating people you don't like was mandatory /s nah, the number one bigot I see here, "buddy", is you.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:37 PM
2

lol wut? I'm a guy, clearly not a feminist by any stretch and I can assure you all that sissy shit is an instant turn-off for me. no thanks, I like my men masculine.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:30 PM
6

yes, so?
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:18 PM
5

what about them?
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:15 PM
7

amuse me: how so?
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:11 PM
6

queerphobic I was gonna ask you to elaborate but then I remembered that homosexual and le queer are not the same thing. now I just think you're a basic NPC like the rest of them "queers".
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:05 PM
2

uh-huh, a collectivist ideology that draws from marxism (e.g. strict victim/oppressor narrative) isn't left wing /s cope harder.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 09:08 PM
3

socialists are not right-wing.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 12:25 PM
14

You do realize that alot of men now are painting their nails now? not that many. sure, some metalheads paints their nails black. other than them... well, I think it goes without saying.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 10:46 AM
1

who's blaming women? we know better than to blame an entire gender, unlike your type. unless you're saying that women should stay away from men's issues, in which case it's only fair that we don't move a finger to help women, either.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:34 PM
4

ah yes, the apex fallacy. we've heard that one before. by that logic we could say people weren't oppressed under communism because the dictators were nationals. also, isn't y'all that claim that women are still oppressed? well, they are now in positions of power, so... get it? by your logic no one can ever be oppressed.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:03 PM
1

I won't go out of my way to defend women but it'd be wise to remember that most women are not like that. most people on those subs are mentally ill and only post their bullshit online because no one takes them seriously irl. others have an agenda to push. don't be like them.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 03:09 AM
25

My point is that it is absurd to take pretend you folks are taking the rational high ground. meanwhile, the feminists: I'd be safer in the forest with a bear because bears can be reasoned with. yeah, I don't think you know what being rational means.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:27 PM
1

you: My point is that it is absurd to take pretend you folks are taking the rational high ground. also, you: Women and girls were below the status of cats and kittens. They were not considered worthy of sacrifice. This is just another way they were oppressed. yeah, I don't think you are in position to talk about being rational, just saying.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:15 PM
3

There's gay men in all sorts of media, and many of them are fantastic, some are not. Dr Who stands out (although that show is shit), but that's just the most recent. Modern Family is another, Will and Grace, etc. not necessarily what I'd call good representation. most gay men don't stand out irl (we look and act just like straight men do); this is not what we see in media, where they are depicted as sassy, dramatic or generally less masculine; and if they are manly, is often played for laughs. o…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:07 PM
14

Have you noticed how many bullshit generalizations circulate on this sub? and then: It's not whataboutism lmao the lack of self-awareness is strong with this one. you are the one participating in one of those wrongs le me? how?
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:55 PM
6

they weren't seen as worthy of being killed as part of a ritual, just like they are not seen as worthy of being conscripted against their will. oh, the oppression. /s get lost, simp.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:40 PM
21

whataboutism, eh? care to show us anything concrete? now, I don't deny that some of these guys do hold a certain anger towards women in general (and it's not hard to see why, whether you agree or not with the sentiment) but two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:19 PM
3

all it proves is that they don't see men as people.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 07:24 PM
3

Not talking about your feelings isn’t doing so well so maybe change it and listen to a homie in distress? hell of assumption you're making there, huh. anyway, it's in the past. y'all can scream le toxic masculinity all you want, but I'm not gonna break into tears everytime something goes wrong, I'd rather find a solution. we are men, not women. If you want to be anti-data and logic with CRT go ahead I won’t stop u. what data, racial studies or whatever you call that marxist bullshit you studied …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 03:24 AM
2

yeah... I find it a kinda difficult to take you seriously, with the CRT and all that "let's talk about our feelings" crap. but if you wanna keep simping like a good le white knight, hoping that you'll get laid some day, by all means, don't let me stop you.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 03:02 AM
0

Thicker skin? I’m pretty sure it’s men with the higher suicide rates thinking like this talk about being spoiled... you're complaining about women getting judged for "setting boundaries" like it was oh such a terrible thing. my whole group of friends got conscripted when we turned 18. hell, my best friend almost died there and the officers didn't care the slightest but you don't see us complain because 1) it's in the past and 2) even back then it wouldn't have solved anything. stop being a such …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 02:44 AM
2

really? people being mean and some vague, cherry-picked examples with no context whatsoever, that's the best you could come up with? y'all need to get a thicker skin. critical race theory 🤡
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:52 AM
33

who would've thought that a collectivist movement which is based on emotion and which sees one side as the eternally-powerless victims of society would attract these kinds of people... I am so shocked /s
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:54 AM
2

I get it, it sucks and all that but is not quite a strong argument, and especially compared to what men have to go through in many countries (my own country, for instance)... I'd say you have it pretty easy.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:21 AM
7

given how feminazis, non-binaries and the rest are overwhelmingly female, I'm inclined to believe it.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:06 AM
5

how?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:02 PM
11

that's hands down the dumbest analogy I've seen in a while. hysterectomy would make a better one but I guess it wouldn't do well in that rhetoric of yours. now shoo, go troll some other sub.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:55 PM
2

Arranged marriages must be fucked doesn't justify murder, though.
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 04:24 AM
3

no wonder they say this sub is full of incels. you haven't had sex. anyways, as a gay man, I couldn't care less. plus, it's not even my country.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:23 PM
5

they're just paying lip service, their actions say otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:44 PM
2

custody, suicide rates, rape allegations,... fall under it how so? and what exactly are they doing to address that?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:57 PM
2

instead of male conscription, gender quotas and other unfair laws, some of which conveniently favor women. but sure, let's focus on tOxIc MaScULiNiTy while forgetting toxic feminity is also a thing.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:42 PM
2

how so? what are they actually doing towards equality? for what I can see all they're doing is throwing privileges at women and putting men down.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:16 PM
1

show us a better source, then.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:02 PM
2

and yet the "good" ones don't seem to be doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 04:57 PM
2

People just dont care. it's worse than that: some people even try to paint it as something positive.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:58 AM
1

same.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:48 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/tdaos0/women_who_think_that_only_men_should_be_drafted/ it's a fucking cesspool.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 02:49 PM
2

this. also, most people here seem to be missing the point.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 02:40 PM
2

as usual
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:13 AM
1

Idk why feminism became the opposite of what it originally meant. it was never about equality
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 04:20 PM
1

yeah, it's disappointing how it always goes unnoticed. I know there's a men's day because I found it's Wikipedia page a few years ago, but most people I've met irl have no idea.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/21 07:18 PM
2

very well said!
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/21 04:47 AM
8

in my country too. I remember back when I was a kid I argued to my teacher that conscription was unfair and she replied that "that's what teaches you to be a man", in front of the class.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 11:18 PM
2

indeed, it's mostly calling out religions on their bullshit. btw I'm atheist.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/21 04:03 AM
2

most comments there claim it sounds bad because is used out of context. WTF! in what plausible context is gendercide a good thing?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/21 02:25 AM
1

somehow this doesn't surprise me.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 06:03 AM
10

false dichotomy.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 05:33 AM
8

feminism is not misandry, dude. Its not about hating men did you forget the #KillAllMen?
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/21 01:46 AM
3

what?! you mean cops aren't real men?!
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/21 01:46 AM
9

there are no sexists feminists even the name implies sexism: feminism. even if the movement wasn't sexist at its core -which it is- it's both unscientific (e.g. gender theory stating that gender is a social construct) and incapable (and sometimes, unwilling) to moderate its own extremists. late edit: clarify "unscientific".
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/20 01:40 AM
5

sadly, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:32 PM
3

sure, when me and my boyfriend spend weeks without shaving our beards it's because we are trying to look more attractive to women /s
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:18 PM
1

male-only conscription is a good example.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 07:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter