TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Conservative_Persona Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by Conservative_Persona on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I think that ‘nice’ is so vague a term that a lot of men and women puts different meaning into it. I think it is better to say ‘kind’. I have a lot of married friends and the men that are kind (and you can be tough as nails and confident at the same time) are the ones who have good marriages. Everybody, both men and women love the tough and confident but kind man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 06:04 PM
1

In fairness, they did not retract the whole study What we find in the corrected analysis is we still see evidence that when wives become sick marriages are at an elevated risk of divorce, whereas we don’t see any relationship between divorce and husbands’ illness. We see this in a very specific case, which is in the onset of heart problems. So basically its a more nuanced finding. The finding is not quite as strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:37 PM
1

My husband is not perfect of course, but it doesn’t matter because we have been together 20+ years and we now are so interconnected and have so much history and bonds that it would be just as inconceivable to not be together as go no contact with my kids. My kids are not perfect either and I love them with all my heart, just like my not perfect husband. I think nobody is perfect, but some relationships gets better and better, you grow together and some relationships gets worse. And you should kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:31 PM
1

Aren’t the divorce rates declining? And boomers having the highest divorce rates of all, so no child custody problems, so why are we talking about an epidemic?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:15 PM
1

Mostly the birth rates are falling because child producing couples have less kids. If you want replacement birth rates, help those who want to have more kids to be able to support them mentally and financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:56 AM
2

Women don’t want their Mom’s life, but men want their Dad’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:51 AM
1

I am a Nordic parent. The problem here is mainly that child producing couples don’t have more than two kids. And this decision is made by the couple, not only the woman. Having more than two kids here, it is problematic, the whole society is made for the 4 person family. Extracurricular activities demand a lot of parental work, most houses have 3 bedrooms etc etc. A study showed that the new rules for car seats for kids that made it impossible to have more than two car seats in a normal car dire…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:39 AM
1

This is how it is in my country, and I think it is the best outcome too. Mind, this is in a setting where there is cheap child care and good parental leave benefits so that both parents are working and contributing about 50/50 when it comes to finances before the divorce too, so it is natural that they do the same afterwards. I don’t think that it is good for neither men nor women that men do all the financial providing and women do all the childcaring in the marriage because the man can easily …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:04 AM
2

We haven’t tried anything and are all out of ideas, ok, heh. Well, I think this exchange has run its course, but thanks for it anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:54 AM
1

Where I am from women are drafted so that isn’t an argument in my country. I will rephrase: what policies should a society do to encourage increase in birth rates? So far it seems that you just think that women should change their minds without any incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:34 PM
1

So what exactly would you change if you were in charge so that divorces ended up for the best for the children? All couples has to have 50/50 split custody?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:11 PM
1

You are not exactly a political talent are you when it comes to problemsolving. What do you think the society should do? I find it very unfair to say that women are greedy when they don’t have more children than they can afford in a country that don’t even have free health care for pregnant women. Your society gives nothing to women for having kids. That is the greedy part here. And anyone that don’t vote for policies that makes it easier for women to have children should really stop complaining…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:58 PM
1

No other solution than what exactly? What is your only solution?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:37 PM
1

I am not sure what you mean exactly. Are you arguing for or against women working? If women are not working and stay at home, of course men would be paying majority of child support after divorce. In a society where women work as much as men, men and women would be split more equally who pays more child support. In my country there is no alimony after divorce because women are expected to be able to support themselves. I think it is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:26 PM
2

But it is the society’s responsibility to make the sacrifice as small as possible. It is absolutely possible to keep the birthrate at acceptable levels with the right policies, and yet have a society where women can work and support themselves. There is no society that have really tried yet. For instance: there was a study in Norway that showed that the new rules about car seats for kids that made it impossible to have more than two car seats in a normal car, had a direct influence in drop of fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:40 PM
1

You base your sheet on if birth rate falls. Two societies with same birth rate, the society where women work are far better off than a society where women don’t. It is far more efficient and sustaining for the planet to not have half the population outside the work force, what a waste of resources, both natural resources and intellectual. The point I am trying to make is that women are not going to give up their financial independence and the birth rate will fall unless the work market will make…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:46 PM
1

I am sorry, I am not a native speaker, what does ‘your strat vs mine’ mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:27 PM
2

You think it is artificially inflated in the US where it is below 60%? Well in my part of the world (Scandinavia) 75% of women have employment compared to men around 80%. That means that we can take care of far more older people than societies where women don’t work as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:51 PM
3

Buddy, you gave a long rant about women’s contribution in the work force as not important, I just mirrored your words. I have far more understanding than you how an advanced society can sustain an aging population. Yes one need to boost birth rate so that the rate at least falls slowly, but you need to incentivize women to have more than two kids in a way that they don’t have to sacrifice their health and independence, and so that it is possible to work and have children at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:30 PM
4

Well women are on average more intelligent than men so I don’t see we can afford to not utilize a huge part of the gene pool. Maybe if half of the population is going to not work, it should be those of below average intelligence, both women and men. If you think this is provocative, it really isn’t any more arrogant than what you wrote. Point is: no advanced country can afford not to have every able adult to not work. You cannot argue that women should have more kids so that more adults can work…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:15 PM
8

The fall in birth rate is mostly due to child producing couples having only 1-2 kids. Any policies boosting birth rate would have to focus on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:08 PM
2

Well, would you pay a lot more taxes to pay for maternity leave and free pregnancy related health care? Free day care? Why not pay for education for women who have kids? Give a income to single women if they have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:01 PM
4

Not a sacrifice, just normal life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:16 PM
3

For women: yes it is worth it, the way society is now. I am not going to sacrifice my health and independence by having more than two kids for someone else. Furthermore: the conservative guys that scream about what women should sacrifice for the common good: When did you ever sacrifice anything for the common good?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:12 PM
2

You do realize old women are the majority of old people, right? As a woman I would rather risk havin a shitty old age than having a shitty whole life. I have two kids, the society we have built (knowingly) makes it too hard to have more kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:08 PM
2

The best people, who both genders want to be friends with/be a lover with are both strong and kind. Nobody wants a person with a chip on the shoulder. Everybody loves the person that is tolerant but won’t stand for bullshit. And don’t forget, people of all ages and genders love the easygoing sunny and funny type of person. The type you are having fun with. Surly, grumpy and easily offended people are tiresome. It really isn’t very different to woo someone for love or friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 11:58 AM
1

Most of my male friends have partners now, but they were frustrated in our 20s. As a woman I felt bad for them because they were my friends and I loved them. But I was often frustrated, because they wanted to get advice from me, but didn’t follow them (I know it is a very human trait) And they often did things that I just knew was a huge turn-off. They just wasn’t able to present themselves in a way that was fair to them. But, those who took my very friendly big-sisterly advices got partners soo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 10:34 PM
3

Families would just look at status, wealth and connections. Me and my siblings all have been married 20-30 years. Our parents would certainly have chosen bad spouses for us because they were snobs. Families aren’t more objective at all, they would choose what benefited them. But what do you think really matter? Kindness? Money?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 02:50 PM
2

So I should choose for my siblings and they should choose for me? And that would be better than choosing for ourselves? How exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 04:09 AM
1

Perhaps conservative religious women do. But it is more like a kink. Most men are starved for love. Most women are starved for respect. Being treated like you are more stupid, your opinions worth less is really anathema to most women. Honestly, would you like to be belittled in a relationship? People really do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:31 PM
1

Honest question: do you think most of the guys desperate to meet women have meaningful friendship with other men? Because if they don’t it is perhaps easier to try to get better at socialising first with other men who won’t be as wary? A lot of women really find it daunting to be only meaningful relationship to a man, no one should have that responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:23 PM
1

A lot of men are starved for love. A lot of women are starved for respect. People need both. And I believe that sometimes some women don’t get the feeling of no empathy for those around. Not trying to dismiss this feeling. But men need also to acknowledge that never being treated with true respect (a guy flattering you for sex is not it) also is very harmful. I honestly think it would be better if things were not so skewed in either direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:19 PM
1

Married with kids. Before kids, we contributed equally financially and chores 50/50. It was fair in that the one who worked much more hours than the other also had more personal money. After kids, we are a family, and the two main assets/resources are time and money. We hold back an amount of money for personal use, to do whatever one wants to use it on. The rest into joint accounts. It also means that the one who works much more also use less time on chores. Sounds fair right? A lot of people a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:11 PM
1

A lot of discussion here who are going to «lead» in a relationship. I have been happily married 20+ yrs and most of my friends the same. I also know some couples who divorced Just so you know where I’m coming from. In my experience is that in happy couples, there isn’t one that leads more than the other. Because it needs to balance out. I am a doctor so I lead when it comes to areas pertinent to that. My husband leads when it comes to houserelated things, economy: we need to be in agreement. Whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 02:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter