TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ContHund Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by ContHund on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

It's a pretty good testament to why it shouldn't be done on infants, it's just unnecessary, regardless of how any of us feel about being cut as adults. If it is truly an aesthetic preference that people are willing to go through surgery for as adults, then that's perfectly fine, but I have a suspicion that very few people would be willing to have the surgery as adults. I think in general people are used to their bodies as they are, for most of us if we were never cut we'd never have any preferen…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:27 PM
5

The only person attempting to berate anyone here (and poorly at that) is you. Grow up.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:22 PM
8

'But that's life' isn't a valid argument for FGM either.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:22 PM
1

I am personally very glad I was circumcised when I was a baby. I would hope most people would feel this, way, having it done as an adult would be quite unpleasant to say the least.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:21 PM
15

You probably already know what selection bias is. Most people who have the procedure done as an adult fall into two categories: They had a medical issue that was alleviated by it like phimosis (and in these cases alternative treatments are often ignored). They did it for ceremonial/religious reasons and thus are very likely to be defensive about their choice. You can see why that has no bearing on whether or not we should be doing this to infants.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:19 PM
4

Good job not replying to anything in my post that would require you to use critical thinking. If you think the notion that performing cosmetic surgery on infants is a bad thing is a radical one, I'd be inclined to say you have no clue what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:50 PM
8

wtf is wrong with you. I swear the people going against circumcision are all uncircumcised people. Nice try, but I'm circumcised. I doubt you'll remember this interaction the next time you make some inane reply in a thread about circumcision.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:03 PM
45

Yeah that's good for you, just like the old women that promote FGM and foot binding. There are people who are proud of being deaf too. If you look hard enough you'll find people proud that they have AIDS. Being proud is one thing, letting your pride and ego get you to a place where you push a harmful practice onto others because it's all you know is totally unacceptable.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:34 PM
17

Please explain how anything in your post applies to whether or not we should be cutting up baby penises without good medical reason... Have you not thought about this at all? If you like being circumcised good for you, no reason to force that on others though. Considering there is no medical justification, it should be left up to the individual to decide if they'd want it done for themselves. It's not a difficult concept to grasp, when you get your ego out of the way.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:31 PM
16

Not all child support is inherently a bad thing. There are definitely cases where it is warranted. However in a lot of cases it's either disproportionately high or not justified in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 08:12 PM
28

She may be rude but she seems like she takes no bullshit and doesn't beat around the bush when it comes to actual injustices, even if it might be mostly for show.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 08:08 PM
3

"Rape victim not forced to pay child support to rapist" would be a very interesting headline to say the least.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:06 AM
11

It's happened multiple times already, in fact there is legal precedent to hold a male accountable for child support even if the father was below the age of consent when the child is conceived. Said precedent has been cited by other courts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:48 PM
6

It would be like having Jim Jones lead a march against Muslim extremism.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:40 PM
1

Nothing on that page talks about opinions on funding for abortion though, but I think I see where the confusion arises. I may have misinterpreted the person I replied to. Misunderstanding aside, I wouldn't equate "most Americans think abortion should be legal under some or most circumstances in the first trimester with restrictions" to "most Americans think of abortion as a right" but that's really just semantics. For example, is driving a car or buying alcohol a right? It probably depends who y…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:17 PM
10

that said you should grab women by their pussies. No, he didn't. He promised and has already restricted funding for abortions, which many women view as their right. More than half of women don't view it as a right...weird huh? This isn't hard to understand, and the false narratives promoted by posts like these just reinforce the line that the men's rights is anti-women. You seem qualified to talk about false narratives.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:42 PM
15

Hence the title of the post" "it's called child support." OP is mocking Maddow for her assertion that men "shouldn't be able to back out of pregnancies" because men already can't back out of a pregnancy due to the law being rigged against them. In other words, she's so stupid in this matter that she's unknowingly advocating that abortion should be illegal.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:51 AM
3

Roe v. Wade should be overturned for a lot of very valid reasons, not the least of which is the fact that it's a huge overreach of judicial power in a matter which should be reserved for the states. That is totally independent of how you may personally feel about abortion.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:33 PM
56

Dying in a trench for their country is probably the most obvious one. Men's right to vote is paid for in blood, for women it's just given to them.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:54 PM
55

It was never about equality, it was about affording women rights without any additional responsibilities.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:32 PM
-1

Would a study supporting the fact that men receive harsher punishments for similar crimes than women convince you?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 12:55 AM
2

IIRC she has said she uses the label to piss off other feminists.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:44 AM
7

It's fetishism, nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 01:21 AM
8

Don't put words in my mouth thx
/r/MensRights25/12/16 11:21 PM
19

I think that normalizing violence towards men is a slightly more pressing issue than women having their acting roles limited. And by slightly I mean hugely. I'm having trouble even imagining how someone could come to the conclusion that it's more harmful to women.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 10:08 PM
23

Wait...when does his mother rape anyone?
/r/MensRights25/12/16 10:07 PM
5

>The only time women actually succeed is when there is evidence This is simply untrue. Have you never heard of the innocence project? >or an admission of guilt Which can be elicited falsely through threats, intimidation, sleep deprivation, you name it. It's happened before and will continue to happen. >even still the judges are usually lenient I think you are mistaking women for men. When women are convicted the judges are more lenient on sentencing, men get the book thrown at them.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:22 AM
9

The only time women actually succeed is when there is evidence This is simply untrue. Have you never heard of the innocence project? or an admission of guilt Which can be elicited falsely through threats, intimidation, sleep deprivation, you name it. It's happened before and will continue to happen. even still the judges are usually lenient I think you are mistaking women for men. When women are convicted the judges are more lenient on sentencing, men get the book thrown at them. Your post sound…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:21 AM
4

You're thinking of "at-will" employment, not "right to work." California is in fact an "at will" state, you can be fired at any time without explanation. "Right to work" just means you don't have to join a union to work. However California does have a "public policy exemption," you can't fire someone as retaliation for adhering to public policy. There are other protections in California for unlawful termination, but any competent company can avoid that pretty easily. That doesn't mean you can't …
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:15 AM
2

checks post history is LoL player not surprised
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:28 AM
7

I'm pretty sure she straight up admitted to rape...and somehow construed it as being a good thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:09 AM
93

In other news water is wet.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:07 PM
2

If you'd been paying attention, you'd realize that I never said there wasn't a dysfunction, but judging by your response I'm not surprised at your lack of reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 03:37 PM
2

It has more to do with how a disorder is defined. It doesn't simply mean "significantly different than the average person" otherwise someone who is very tall but otherwise healthy would have a disorder for example, which is not how it works. It has more to do with how the specific condition causes dysfunction and distress to the person. In the case of transgender individuals, it's not the state of wanting to identify as a woman or a man that causes distress and dysfunction, because if they could…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:57 AM
1

You're wrong, but only slightly. I still appreciate your input. Transgenderism, on its own, is not a mental disorder. Gender dysphoria is. The two are closely related but not inseparable. There are people with types of dysphoria that are not transgender, and there are transgender people who no longer deal with dysphoria. We treat the dysphoria, not transgendetism, because only the former causes distress and dysfunction.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:51 AM
3

Calling people who are misinformed on the topic pricks doesn't help anyone. It doesn't encourage people to become better informed, and it doesn't help people look positively on transgender issues to approach ignorance with hostility. Lots of people confuse gender dysphoria with being transgender, hence the confusion, try to explain to them first, and you'll find out soon enough if they're just a prick or just misinformed.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:45 AM
6

You will probably find people here who say certain things like, "you have a mental illness." We don't need to deny reality here and alienate people who are slightly misinformed on the topic. While this is a common misunderstanding, gender dysphoria is undoubtedly a mental disorder, and a serious one at that which causes a lot of pain and suffering. Being transgender on its own is not, which is the common misconception. If a transgender person deals with their dysphoria in a way that causes it to…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:41 AM
1

This really applies to you, not women. Now stop shitting all over the Internet and get back in your hole where you belong dog.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:03 PM
3

Hey now, I could be English! Ya bloody robot!
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:52 PM
10

I can fault you for your original comment for jumping to conclusions without actually bothering to look into it yourself, and I will fault you for this post for being an inflammatory cunt instead of, again, looking into this yourself.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:49 PM
52

You are very misinformed on the topic of the movie if you think it has anything to do with the subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:43 PM
38

Men popularly being viewed as unable to be victims of domestic abuse is definitely a result of patriarchal conditioning. It has to do with how society expects men to behave and react, and what we expect from "masculinity". Being a victim of a class of people generally considered weak and demure implies weakness in the man. It is seen as emasculating, in the same way calling a man a bitch or a pussy or saying something like "I'm taking away your man card" is seen. In a patriarchy, men have are ex…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:06 AM
3

Excuse me, do we know each other? Thankfully probably not. And why don't you keep your white knighting to yourself. I don't think you understand what white knighting actually means. Ironically an actual white knight would be critical of CSH for being anti-woman, not praising her for being pro-men. Get your shit straight. You're the other end of the horseshoe from batshit crazy SJWs.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:26 PM
4

She's done more for men's rights than you ever will, so how about you keep your ignorant sexism to yourself?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 12:04 PM
11

You can't be serious... She wrote a book called "The War Against Boys" and regularly and fiercely criticises feminist misandry. She's even stated she uses the feminist label in part to piss of radical feminists. How misinformed can a person be?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:15 AM
2

Is...is that projection?
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:46 PM
10

I think it's called projection.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:46 PM
10

Good for you but I'm not sure how that's relevant to whether or not we should circumcise babies.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:16 PM
1

So feminists hate men because they think they're all the same. That seems like an oversimplification to say the least. I would say they hate men because they are hateful people and feminism enables that hate with a canard of moral correctness. You see this happen with any movement which preaches moral superiority, hateful people will latch on because they've found a way to enable their hate. Isn't it hypocritical to hate all feminists then? Feminism isn't a gender, despising feminists isn't sexi…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:02 AM
8

You mention treating women like property a lot, you basically have a single-purpose account.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:27 PM
-3

Is the_Donald leaking or something? Go back to your hole.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:14 PM
174

You might have reading comprehension issues.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 07:01 PM
3

Social justice activism doesn't necessarily make you a social justice warrior, it makes you an activist. SJW is pejorative because it describes people who have taken that sentiment to a figuratively militant level. Some MRAs are guilty of this, maybe even most of us, but don't fall into the trap of assuming anyone who is an activist is a fanatic. Similarly, not all feminists are SJWs.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 10:15 AM
2

I think I replied to the wrong comment lol
/r/MensRights13/11/16 03:07 PM
10

Except that's not how the mechanism for orgasm/ejaculation actually works. iirc premature ejaculation isn't more common among uncut men. Furthermore that's something that circumcised men, who have likely been told their entire lives that being cut makes them last longer, men who have never experienced it any other way, said in a survey, you don't think there's a little bit of bias and lack of perspective there? You might as well send out a survey asking "do you think your penis is awesome" and y…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:50 PM
16

Haha male sexuality is evil amirite?
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:38 PM
10

If people think it was bad under Obama, how much worse under a guy who brags about that shit. You missed my point, people largely don't care now, they won't care under Trump. Furthermore the assertion that drone strikes would somehow be worse under Trump than under Clinton is baseless. Both parties appear to have have an urge to kill people in the Middle East. And who supports every military intervention in the Mideast there is. Wait, are we living in a different universe? Clinton is undoubtedly…
/r/MensRights12/11/16 09:18 PM
23

Or that time Trump said he'd kill the families of terrorists. Considering our past two presidents have been basically doing this exact thing on a regular basis via drone strikes, people really don't seem to care as much as they should.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 08:32 PM
2

I bought a car the other day but later on decided it was a bad purchase. I was robbed by the salesman!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 07:44 PM
2

Or voted third party! If you don't live in a swing state that's pretty much the only way your vote will count ironically. Pushing a third party into the debates is a big deal.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:40 AM
9

Feminism is an ideology, not a gender, not a race. That underhanded tactic just needs to stop. Hating feminism/feminists is not the equivalent of hating men.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:54 PM
11

I feel there is a double standard here though. The double standard would be allowing one but not the other, but what you are talking about is how apparently there isn't as big of a consumer base for a men only gym, which is really besides the point, we shouldn't afford rights to one sex and not the other based on perceived need, which is totally subjective.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:05 PM
14

They can refuse to style long hair though, which is sort of the point of a barber shop. Women can use a barber shop if they want barber shop service.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 07:58 PM
35

I would add the caveat that if women only gyms are ok, so should men only gyms. However history has proven that there's a double-standard here as well.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 07:13 PM
1

TRP has long passed you guys in the usage of the term. It is associated with it immediately on the internet and much of its other terms have spread viral from it. I'm not disagreeing with any of that, in fact /r/theredpill's usage of the phrase is probably a large reason for the maligning of the phrase and it's disuse, and by all means it's unfortunate they did not change the name of the film, this has all been discussed at length already. I'm just pointing out that the name of the film has noth…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:11 AM
3

"The Red Pill" is a reference to The Matrix, a movie, and the phrase was used by MRAs long before it was coopted by the bitterest subset of the PUA community. TRP is just a pathetic subreddit, they have no more claim to the phrase/concept than anyone else looking to describe an awakening or sudden realization of a larger truth.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:45 AM
6

Oh no, it's retarded
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:37 AM
2

It seems like they encountered the idea of men's rights but wrote it off completely at first. That's close-mindedness.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 06:53 PM
3

His first paragraph describes an utterly close-minded perspective. He opened his mind to the idea that the MRM isn't evil later on. My point is that if "open-minded feminists" would agree with the MRM if only they actually took a look, they aren't really open-minded at all. Hence describing open-mindedness with literally a description of the opposite. They have the potential for open-mindedness to be sure, but having the potential to be open-minded while remaining close-minded is still being clo…
/r/MensRights05/11/16 02:58 PM
1

You're talking about people that haven't done exactly that. If someone has maligned the MRM by default only because they haven't even bothered looking at both sides yet, that's closed-mindedness. That's those "open-minded" feminists you're talking about, people who would agree with the things the MRM espouses if only they...opened their minds.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 02:37 PM
3

You just responded to the idea of feminists not being "open-minded" with a description of feminists being close-minded.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 01:42 PM
11

On the plus side, they make it easy to pick which defaults to unsubscribe from You mean all of them?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:52 PM
3

I should have been more clear, my bad, replace "commit violence" with "instigate violence" in my post and it makes more sense. I agree, there's no good reason to not defend yourself just because your attacker is weaker.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:12 PM
3

I would expect a pro fighter to take some pledge to not use their training to commit violence, I remember doing something like that in beginner karate classes. Except that's a bit different from expecting someone to take a similar pledge, applicable only to women, just for being a man. That's like requiring black children to take a pledge never to steal.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:13 PM
78

And then the Jews were taken to the retraining centers and made to take a pledge to never lay a hand upon a pure-blooded ubermensch.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 04:53 PM
24

And even if it was, it doesn't have to be reciprocal to be a fight. If someone is hitting you and you are blocking them, it's still a fight.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 04:51 PM
7

If we showed them the above video it wouldn't ruin their day at all.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:30 PM
1

Savage
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:28 PM
1

Robert>Rob>Bob William>Will>Bill Richard>Rick>Dick
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:12 AM
6

Thanks for the info, although you can really make a similar point about it referring to cats and not female genitalia.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:10 PM
14

Interestingly "dick" didn't originally refer to male genitalia but the name "Dick," which sort of referred to an everyman sort of character, an unsavory person. It's sort of like when police refer to men who pay for prostitutes "Johns." The same goes for pussy, it's just short for pusillanimous, which means timid, shy, fearful, etc. Apparently that's a "folk etymology" and it comes from "puss" which refers to a cat.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:48 PM
5

Close, but the word is "pusillanimous" and it's actually not the word "pussy" is derived from. It comes from "puss" which means cat.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:42 PM
67

Consent isn't being used as a philosophical concept here.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:52 PM
1

If that's all you took away from my comment, you completely missed the point. If my statement was purely about legality equating to how acceptable I find it, why would I make the comment about how it shouldn't be illegal? How could my basis for morality be bounded by legality if I'm making evaluations on what should or shouldn't be illegal? Seriously are you daft? Seriously think that over for a bit. If you can't figure out the difference between thinking that something legal is acceptable and s…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 07:36 PM
1

What could I possibly be projecting? That saying what you would do on the internet is always a calculated plan to act a certain way, rather than just a description of what you'd likely do. You're attributing something to someone else that you have no possible way of actually knowing is true, based off of two sentences.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 03:54 AM
1

That's pretty far from what he said. It seems like that's exactly what he said. He said he would hit this woman the same as he would a man. And I'll remind you that you said: but a lot of y'all really are just sexist pricks. Are you saying that you no longer think that but instead think that people like that are childish? It seems like we're having a different discussion now. Honestly I do not think that hitting someone who spit on you is childish at all. It's just a human reaction. At a certain…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 08:55 PM
1

Maybe you're just projecting?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:32 PM
3

Maybe they just gave a realistic evaluation of how they'd react to that situation.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:20 PM
7

It makes you a human.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:59 PM
4

Like honestly I can't understand how you could think that comment wasn't clearly written by someone with an irrational issue with women. Because you're delusional. He has an issue with people who spit on other people. If all you extracted from his very short post is "this guy obviously fantasizes about hurting rude women" then you're deliberately trying to be offended. I've seen feminists spout the same retarded bullshit. "This guy said he would hit a woman the same as a man, obviously they just…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:23 PM
8

Not the person doing the spitting?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:10 PM
1

Within established laws, yes, catcalling at women (or men) in public is acceptable. You don't have a right to not be interacted with in public. Is the person doing the yelling an idiot? Possibly. That doesn't mean they are breaking the law, or that it should be illegal. Furthermore yes, the fact that some women find catcalling flattering and the fact that it leads to some people actually interacting further, demonstrates that this is a subjective topic. It's another case of a situation being cre…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:45 PM
1

If you're not willing to engage in civil discourse and participate in good faith, why should I or anyone else bother creating a thoughtful response? I happily would, but right now you're just being dishonest and childish. If you can't have a discussion without stooping to putting words in someone's mouth or misrepresenting the opposing views to make yourself look better, there's no discussion to be had.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:24 PM
1

Yeah actually, very intelligent response.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:37 PM
-1

Catcalling is prevalent in certain subcultures because it's not offensive, even expected, and occasionally successful. It's offensive to some women who experience it, who cares? That's totally subjective. If unsolicited and occasionally lude compliments in public are your biggest concerns, you lead a privileged life.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 10:25 PM
1

I don't think they understand what Trans means either, you don't identify as Trans...
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:55 PM
1

SIR, I ALREADY TOLD YOU I AM NOT A GENDER PERSON, YOU ARE REFUSING TO HELP ME SO I AM GOING TO SHIT NOW!
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:51 PM
3

18 years of forced work is less of a violation of one's autonomy than what amounts to minor surgery? What are you getting on about? I wonder how the rate of death/injury for the average male worker over 18 years of work compares to the rate for abortions in general. Force a man to work for 18 years to support an unwanted child and it's business as usual, force a woman to do anything with her body and people lose their fucking minds.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:08 PM
3

The question you have to ask is why. Why does the fact that women get pregnant mean that men should have to support unwanted kids? Why does a biological reality have to affect the rights someone is afforded? As a man I have to take the risk of higher risk of workplace death, higher risk of being a victim of violent crime, higher chance of being drafted, higher chance of dying early from disease, higher chance of going to prison, higher chance of being killed by police...I could go on. Those are …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:03 PM
7

Ever heard of financial abortion? There is a solution, it's been right there the whole time. If a man, upon being informed of a pregnancy in which he is the father, decides he does not want to be involved in that child's life, he could then forego all parental responsibilities and privileges.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:18 AM
20

So essentially women have the right to have sex and forego parental responsibilities in the event of pregnancy, but men do not, and that's that? To reduce that even further, a woman's right to not be forced to have an abortion trumps a man's right to not have to work for no wages to support someone else. The right to not have to bear children and be a mother just because they chose to have sex is something that was fought for when it comes to women, why are people so content to apply the exact s…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:14 AM
82

Isn't forcing someone to pay child support a violation of their autonomy?
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:57 PM
10

It is literally mutilation by definition. The definition of mutilated isn't "the state of feeling mutilated" btw.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:00 PM
6

The thing is that those enemies are already made as soon as you voice your opposition to the practice, it has nothing to do with the presentation, the hate that intactivists get is pretty much purely from the message alone. At least this way grabs the attention of people who may be on the fence. Anyone that sees this and becomes an enemy of intactivists and circumcises their kids because of that wasn't going to come around with a less provocative presentation, because that kind of person is a fu…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 04:59 PM
1

Women can legally topless in public in the majority of US states, they just choose not to.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:22 AM
-9

So...the way it is right now?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:32 PM
2

The big thing that these convictions miss is attempted false imprisonment by proxy. If I hired a bunch of goons to kidnap someone and it's revealed I was going to put them in a dungeon in my basement for years, they should go to prison for a long time. Lie to the police to get them to do essentially the same thing and it's just falsifying records.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:27 PM
3

Do you have split custody? Are you in the US? Start documenting everything, family courts take parental alienation very seriously in situations like this.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:35 AM
1

Then you'll have idiots come in and say things like "women aren't objects that can be locked or stolen, comparing them to cars is misogyny" and you're like no shit, it's an analogy.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:00 AM
1

The Duluth model assumes only men can commit domestic violence. Family courts in the US and Canada tend to favor women in custody cases, assuming women are the best caregivers for their children. Men are routinely discouraged from positions in childcare, pediatrics, and education on the presumption that they are more likely to be child abusers and pedophiles. Legal definitions routinely define rape as something only men can do. If you don't think that the stigma that men are dangerous to childre…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:17 PM
8

A huge aspect of the MRM is countering the well-entrenched narrative that only men are abusers, pedophiles, rapists, etc, and the "women are wonderful" effect. A good way to do that is to put emphasis on cases where women do horrible things. In a lot of those cases there is additional emphasis on how the women receive light sentences despite committing horrible crimes, and the rationalizations people use to excuse that behavior. Not to mention in this case specifically it was a woman murdering h…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:54 AM
6

The well has been poisoned.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:22 AM
0

In my experience it's the self-proclaimed "alphas" that are going to throw other men under the bus to impress their feminist friends and attempt to get poon. Real "alphas" don't even buy into the alpha/beta bullshit, real betas are the kind of people who post about the alpha/beta bullshit online and think they are alphas, and the people they refer to as betas are just men who aren't good with women and can't figure out why, instead of deluding themselves into thinking having sex occasionally mea…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 09:51 AM
1

They barely admit to it already. Mattress girl is still doing her thing, when she should be in prison. Not punishing her hasn't caused her to admit she lied. How about we punish false accusers for their crimes, and the police and justice system do their jobs and determine when an accusation is false? We don't need false accusers to come forward and admit to it, we don't need to encourage that by not punishing false accusations, we need actual investigations and legal action taken when it turns o…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:29 AM
0

What bias? The MRM is opposed to feminist ideology because much of it is harmful to men. We're not hiding that.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 08:05 AM
4

No, that's feminism at its core, since the first wave. Third wave feminism just added more batshit into the mix.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:45 AM
-7

Anyone who would be alienated by a photoshop of a comic that results in obvious satire has skin so thin they'd be useless as allies in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:42 AM
0

It's a photoshop of another comic...it's satire.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:37 AM
1

To be fair, there are lots of feminists who are also MRAs, they just usually get smeared as anti-women by other feminists, and have to clarify that they are "egalitarian" or "equity" feminists to distinguish themselves from the usual misandrist feminists.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:35 AM
-2

As long as we keep an us vs. them mentality, we will get nowhere and they will always view us as basement dwelling women haters. They would smear us that way no matter what we do. when you challenge the current monopoly they have on discussion of issues of gender they're going to lash out.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:26 AM
2

What I found most hilarious at the time was the fact that the "[Unsolicited opinions on Israel]" line was itself implicitly an unsolicited opinion on Israel. Projection in action.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:07 PM
1

I don't hate black people, I just want to end the negroarchy. /s
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:04 PM
9

So you think it was equally creepy for the girl to photograph him?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:56 PM
10

Use your head. Take your own advice lol.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:55 PM
3

I'd say something sarcastic like "retard alert!" but my brother is literally mentally retarded and even he can understand things like this, so doing so would actually be an insult to him.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:54 PM
1

It almost sounds like there's a dismissive attitude about female paedophile rapists in that county system. What should we call this culture of tolerance regarding the rape of male children by female adults?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:24 PM
3

Same with people genuinely upset over a the black/female leads in TFA. Like 4 people, most likely trolls, say something ridiculous and all of a sudden it's "widespread outrage."
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:45 PM
18

Did someone shit in your lucky charms this morning sweetheart?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:11 PM
7

If you marry and have kids with someone you don't want to that's your own fucking problem and to blame somebody else for it just makes you look like a bitch. Very eloquently put, but I'm not sure how you inferred any of that from the comic. There's nothing to indicate he didn't want marriage or kids, just that his wife pushed for it. Furthermore where's the blame for forcing him to get married and have kids? Also, if you stay in a marriage you're not happy in that's also your own decision. K...s…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 03:18 PM
8

Yes, because as we all know, if a black person does something bad in fiction, it's because the author wants to imply that all black people do that. /s
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:56 PM
5

They've been trying to do this with anything in the "manosphere." MRA, PUA, MGTOW, it doesn't really matter, they're misogynists and they're automatically wrong in their eyes. It's the ultimate ad hominem.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:51 PM
11

It was possible to be a feminist without being considered a sexist. If you consider narratives about male privilege and female oppression to be fundamental to feminism, then no, it is impossible to be a feminist and not also a sexist.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 06:45 PM
21

And that's exactly what feminists say about MRA's, too. You do realize that saying something on its own doesn't make it true right?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 06:43 PM
77

Allegations should be taken seriously. They should be handled by the police, investigated thoroughly, and proper action should be taken according to that investigation. What logically follows is that if those allegations are proven to have been made intentionally and falsely they should be taken just as seriously as if they were proven true, and those who make false accusations should be held up to the same scrutiny under the criminal justice system as anyone else who makes a false report to pol…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:26 PM
15

My Irish and Lithuanian Jewish ancestry is just dripping with privilege. I mean my great-grandparents had the privilege of not being killed in pogroms right?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:11 PM
15

They'll probably claim that NOW isn't a real feminist organization,because feminism=fighting for equality and nothing else.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:53 PM
11

Well, there are certainly individual feminists who fight for men, like Christina Hoff Sommers, but they're also MRAs and not-so-ironically other feminists hate them.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:29 PM
3

This just isn't true. I'm not sure how you can say that when you're the example. I am a man in a very privileged part of the world who works in a STEM field, I'm heterosexual and curious of the world around me. What about any of that is relevant? I've dated feminist women who LOVE men and happily do fight for men's rights. One of my female feminist friends who works in Social Services, works almost exclusively with men trying to help them get back on their feet. And she's a proponent of feminism…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:47 PM
5

I didn't need to fling poo on the MRA narrative. And yet you, and people like you do it constantly, based on a surface level (and utterly ignorant) analysis of "feminism=good, criticism of feminism=bad" with no actual further analysis or critical thinking. That is what an entrenched media narrative looks like. That's what happens when one ideology has a monopoly on all discussions about gender. That's what happens when you live in an utterly gynocentric society where the majority of people are u…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:29 PM
6

I contribute to solving men's issues in my community and still take the occasional opportunity to point out in online forums the utter hypocrisy that feminists will gladly slander the entire MRM for just "whining about men's issues online and bashing on feminism" despite the fact that we raise legitimate concerns about neglected issues which primarily affect men, and criticise feminist ideology and policy where it has legitimately harmed men, with concrete examples and data, and then feminists h…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:35 PM
3

Good, she deserves to be fired/ expelled. Anyone who is willing to use physical force to intimidate other students should not just be fired or expelled, they should be charged with the crime they've committed and punished.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:56 PM
2

Thanks for posting that was a really detailed analysis. I hadn't considered a lot of those aspects of something as mundane as parking lot security.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:17 AM
4

Cool so men should have extra police resources dedicated solely to men, on account of the fact that men are more likely to be victims of violent crime. While we're at it, we need MOSHA because men are more likely to be injured in the workplace.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:11 AM
24

Don't you know? Rape is always a crime of power. /s
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:12 PM
6

Doublethink in action.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:22 AM
3

Isn't that the exact same despicable argument used to deny women abortions?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:11 PM
2

That is why both parents need to be on the hook to take care of the child, regardless of circumstances. So are you suggesting we repeal safe haven laws and replace them with something that puts the mother on the hook for 18 years financially for the child? But seriously making any policy regardless of the circumstances is bad policy. There are certainly circumstances where one parent should be more responsible for the child than another, such as when one has openly declared they do not want to s…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:07 PM
5

Look at the questions used: During the first 18 years of life, did an adult, relative, family friend, or stranger ever (1) touch or fondle your body in a sexual way, (2) have you touch their body in a sexual way, (3) attempt to have any type of sexual intercourse with you (oral, anal, or vaginal), or (4) actually have any type of sexual intercourse with you (oral, anal, or vaginal)? I think (1) is the most questionable on the basis that as a child we may not fully recognize when we are being tou…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:45 PM
1

Good point. That's a really important detail.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:42 AM
3

I'll copy it for you. I do think that both people should be financially liable for the cost of aborting the child, or the medical costs of childbirth if abortion is unavailable, if neither wants to be a parent. However I don't think men or women should be liable past that if they don't want to be involved and have stated so prior to the birth. Now if you have the case of someone walking out on their spouse and kids later on after establishing that they did intend to be a parent, that's where chi…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:35 AM
1

You ignored a very important part of my response which directly addresses what you're saying.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:29 AM
10

Warning, this is long, but I felt like giving you a genuine response of my thoughts on the matter. It's never going to be 100% equal. I'm not sure how that's relevant. We've already established that ideally women shouldn't be obligated to become parents just because they have sex. Currently women can get abortions in many US states. Currently men can avoid parenthood once named the father in ZERO states. We can do better than that. Forcing unfair circumstances onto everyone because of the unfair…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:53 PM
206

"She chose to have sex she agreed to be a mother." - Regressive assault on the reproductive rights women. "He chose to have sex so he agreed to be a father." - Mainstream opinion on male financial abortion.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:08 PM
2

Those are some dapper looking men.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:37 PM
1

Just curious, where are you looking that says you treat singular nouns ending in s like plural nouns endong in s? I've never seen that rule used or heard about any disagreement about this.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:11 PM
1

Hence why it gets 's instead of just an apostrophe, it's plural but doesn't end in s.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 01:50 PM
1

Singular nouns are always made possessive by adding 's, even when it ends in s. It's "James's boat." You add just the apostrophe without the s only for plural nouns that end in s, otherwise it is still 's. So Children -> children's, boys -> boys' , and James -> James's.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:09 AM
3

It would be penis's or penises'. As in "Hey, that's my penis's hat" or "This is the national socialist German penises' party."
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:10 AM
3

So if sovereignty over your own body is so important, then why is it acceptable for a man who doesn't want to be a parent to be forced to pay child support for a child he didn't want with money earned via hours of labor with his body. It's less direct but directly applicable. If women are afforded abortions because forcing them to carry a child for 9 months and give birth in a day or two with their bodies violates their bodily autonomy, then why aren't men given the option to forgo working for 1…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter