TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ContrarianDouche Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by ContrarianDouche on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Very much r/outoftheloop on this one
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/25 09:09 PM
160

You already know the answer to this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 05:41 PM
4

Nice non-sequiter. This conversation was about conscription remember? Pierre-Eliot Trudeau sent the army on us Pretty sure that was the FLQ. Unless you're trying to say that FLQ = Quebec? That's gonna be a hard sell mon ami. and imprisonned families with no trial. War Measures Act is a hell of a drug. Try not sheltering terrorists if you don't want your rights suspended. Only ignorants believe Canada is a free country. And only a Sith deals in absolutes. Canada has its flaws but an active conscr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 10:01 PM
8

Canada's system is defunct and would be unlikely to survive a Charter challenge if it was ever reintroduced. The SSS is active and revokes many citizenship benefits if men fail to register. Are you really gonna try to compare the two?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 07:08 PM
13

Still on the books though. Hard to say "USA has no conscription" when they literally do
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 04:21 PM
2

Your leader is a piece of shit and that's rubbing off on the populace that is supporting his war machine. Not much sympathy for russians in russia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 04:19 PM
15

Countries like USA Huh, I wonder what the Selective Service System is for then?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 03:57 PM
8

Well said
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 06:25 PM
13

What's wrong with men taking other roles, besides the most rudimentary in modern society? Nothing. Obviously. However the paper being discussed isn't about "modern society" is it? Inb4 "we're not talking about the paper, we're talking about the parent comment" Yeah I know, but in the context of research being done to redefine roles and their relation to gender in early societies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 05:08 PM
28

In all seriousness, yesterday. Bears are pretty common in my neck of the woods. Guess why it's me that takes the garbage out and not my SO. And sorry you didn't get to make your little gotcha moment where you get to say "protection from what? From other men". Shouldn't the "protection" role be contextualized into early hunter/gatherer societies, since that's the "hunter" role that is being analysed? I bet they saw lions, tigers, and bears pretty frequently; and saw them as a huge threat. Lol @ "…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 05:02 PM
27

Protecting from what? Lions, Tigers, Bears, Oh my
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 04:41 PM
0

Quick Google (man jailed revenge porn / woman jailed revenge porn) returns several articles showing both. Perhaps both of you dealing in absolutes are wrong? SMH children
/r/MensRights08/02/22 07:26 PM
13

Wow that second one boils me, glad he won eventually
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 11:17 PM
9

It's all about the implication
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:21 PM
4

Banned homie
/r/MensRights11/09/21 04:10 PM
1

there's no chance of a draft happening so it's a moot point. LMFAO fucking source on that one? If it's legally possible then there's no way you can claim that it can't happen. You're either wilfully ignorant or trolling
/r/MensRights01/09/21 06:53 PM
4

You know what, you're right. If you don't register for the draft you are not explicitly barred from voting. However by failing to register for the draft you are subject to a $250000 fine and/or jail time. Good luck registering to vote without raising any of those questions. It's disenfranchisement with extra steps Source
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:19 PM
8

Everywhere in the United States. If you do not register for the draft then you are barred from many things a normal citizen would expect. Voting, federal student loans, etc Men only though. Women get these rights upon turning 18, no registration needed
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:58 PM
3

Considering soda is in a syrup form until the machine dispenses it... Probably
/r/MensRights27/07/21 11:21 PM
2

Because if the mods here allow a link to that subreddit, the mods of that subreddit will turn to the admins and say "look at this hateful brigading" and the admins then have their excuse to ban the sub. Same reason to not ban members of other subs (despite it being totally fine in reverse)
/r/MensRights15/07/21 08:35 PM
6

Upvoted, but it took me a couple reads to get your point. When you lead off with your sarcastic feminist talking point, it reads as being your main point instead of a sarcastic counterpoint. Especially with the amount of trolls on this sub that would comment that seriously. I bet most people read your first two sentences, down voted and moved on
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:12 PM
128

Link to the book Baldwin wrote the preface and Depp wrote the introduction
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:34 PM
19

Decent article, but lacking substance and citations. The assertions the author makes feel true and and my confirmation bias loves that, bit without more data to back up the claims it makes, this one falls short
/r/MensRights30/01/21 04:48 PM
10

Karen Straughn had a great line "they say language is so powerful that calling a firefighter a fireman is going to discourage little girls to want to fight fires, but it's just a coincidence that we named all these negative things after men, language has no power"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:21 PM
5

The Duluth Model
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/12/20 07:06 AM
7

Fucking saved. Thank you for this
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:15 PM
3

Good bot
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:06 PM
17

Paywall
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:09 PM
3

Thank you for this. Subscribed
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:58 PM
6

"Oscars so white" ring any bells?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen06/04/20 11:16 AM
4

Ummmm these gals might want a word with you about that last bit
/r/MensRights06/02/20 08:19 PM
2

...something something "primary victims of war"
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:04 AM
10

You're* If you're gonna be an asshole, at least be correct
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:42 AM
2

This link is cancer
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:31 PM
9

Blacks and Hispanics are more likely than whites This line jumped out at me. "Blacks" is the start of the sentence, but is there a reason why "Hispanics" is capitalized while "whites" is not? Obviously not a massive deal or anything, just seemed strange to me
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:39 PM
5

Because to them no women allowed = they're planning how to hurt women
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:30 PM
2

I agree. At least in the former case I have some control over how I process and deal with what happened. In the latter there is literally nothing you can do
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:48 PM
6

Because a group of men together without female supervision is automatically suspect and probably up to no good
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:39 PM
3

No problems. If you have any specific questions or looking for opinions let em fly or shoot me a DM. Usually there is a bit of apathy in response to "can anyone give me a list of issues" since the whole movement is in response to a long list of issues that all tie into each other in a complex way that can be hard to simplify. I think it was Elam who said "it's like trying to understand a snowdrift one flake at a time". Watch The Red Pill by Cassie Jaye if you want to get a good overall view of s…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:33 PM
6

-draft -workplace fatalities -circumcision -alimony -combat deaths -suicide gap -empathy gap -male disposablity -human beings vs human doings Those might be some interesting Google's to get you started building a couple responses
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:17 PM
10

An arrest is one of the final steps before prosecution. Before executing an arrest, the evidence is already pointing towards having a strong enough case to go to trial already. Police don't arrest people just to question them, which are the variables that you're conflating.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:31 PM
66

De facto vs De jure. Yes, sex and race are protected, but finding a lawyer and judge who will not laugh your case out of court (that is if you get that far in the first place) is the real limiting factor on legal options
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:31 PM
3

I agree with you on the suggestion/rule point. I also agree that fighting against women-only events isn't and shouldn't be the main thrust of the argument. However it must also be said that if no push back at all happened against this type of exclusion, it's tacitly approved that women only = good while men only = bad. That's the distinction that needs to be highlighted and debated. But both sides seem to be really good and missing opportunities for reasonable discussion, opting instead for rant…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:57 PM
73

On its face, it's not. The issue comes when the only women can make their spaces exclusive, and not men. The fact that men gathering is inherently bad or suspicious and in need of "diversity" while women only groups are seen as great things that must be protected is more of the issue.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 09:05 PM
1

Ones 16 and ones 20. Says so right in the article
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:59 PM
13

Hahahahaha that's your takeaway? Word. Bye.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:37 PM
1

You're the one making assertions. So back them up. If you want to change my mind or convince me of something you're gonna need more than just a statement
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:47 PM
1

Yes I could be convinced that false accusations are a type of violence. Which should make it repugnant to anyone with any sense. I'm all for calling attention to the issue but encouraging reciprocal violence (especially of a physical nature) is not going to help convincing anyone to take the issue seriously. If anything it will drive people away that otherwise would be open to listening to what we have to say. Non-violence sends a much more powerful message to evoke change than "eye-for-an-eye" …
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:51 PM
-2

Anything you say before the word but is irrelevant. This is misguided thinking that does not help any cause but feeding the narrative that women are justified in being scared of men. Violence is unacceptable
/r/MensRights11/04/18 08:44 PM
3

The other thing
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:47 PM
4

Feminists: Being the evil they want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:05 PM
5

Feminists: Being the evil they want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:02 PM
3

Feminists: Being the evil they want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:01 PM
2

Feminists: Being the evil they want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:00 PM
1

Stalin is a pretty apt comparison. What with the cultural Marxism and identity politics
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:08 PM
4

That m is killing me. /r/keming
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:06 PM
11

Because "wage gap" makes you think equality of outcome needs to be instituted. "Effort gap" implies agency of the "victim" and shows the equality of opportunity that already exists.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:31 PM
1

In Hollywood? Yeah he had that kind of power. It's still political power even if it's not in government
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:29 PM
12

...projecting? Or just naive?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:47 PM
22

The sonic boom of the simultaneous knee slaps blew out windows for blocks around Edit: a word
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:57 PM
1

I got the same one about 2 weeks ago
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:26 AM
1

Man love Thursday's!
/r/MensRights18/11/17 02:49 AM
0

Also felt that the name-calling at the end was unnecessary. Attack the arguments not the person
/r/MensRights18/10/17 06:50 AM
7

"Everything that comes before the word 'but' is meaningless"
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:19 PM
3

IIRC the reasoning is that the damage to the well being of the child from not having financial support outweighs the damage to the man who is forced to pay. Not agreeing with it, but trying to clarify the argument. **edit - including psychological damage to the child (ie. "Wrongful Life")
/r/MensRights06/10/17 04:44 PM
2

Gotta love those annual briefs
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:36 PM
2

Oh you've seen that Dave Chappelle bit too eh?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 11:40 AM
1

Which doesn't make it his quote. Learn basic rhetoric and definitions before you come trying to sound holier-than-thou. Up your game :P
/r/MensRights17/08/17 03:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter