TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CoolHandLukeSkywalka Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by CoolHandLukeSkywalka on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Work is a great place to meet a wife but a shitty place to meet a hookup, fling or STR
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 12:04 AM
1

Where can I, a mutt, meet these girls? I always get the "sorry I'm into white boy looks" types
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 12:00 AM
0

They don't whats even your evidence of that? My experience is men and women both have basically equally varied tastes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 11:59 PM
1

No. Its a want.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 05:36 PM
1

Its hard to tell because you don't know everything about everyone but from people that do talk I'd say about 1/3 are dead bedrooms but typically thats the result of both not just one gender
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 05:32 PM
1

Its more about striving to be your best self rather than just accepting the way things are. ''be yourself" is bad advice. "Be the best self you can possible be" is good advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:44 PM
1

I dated a cam girl once. It was fun. I'd do it again. Not a deal breaker for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 07:55 PM
0

True advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 03:55 PM
1

his is about the psychological issues that growing up with a set of circumstances can cause. Sure buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 01:04 AM
7

I'd say its more the bittermen stigmatizing the single mother that caused the resentment. Nothing inherent in being a single mother is going to cause resentment (that's an irrational suggestion). But it is clear that the stigma from the social conservatives is a big part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 05:52 AM
1

They think the only thing stopping them from being Donald Trump is the damn government and taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 05:46 AM
2

lol get this Ayn Rand crap out of here The welfare state doesn't punish virtuous behavior (whatever virtuous is supposed to mean here) and it certainly doesn't reward anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 05:40 AM
1

the right to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 11:13 PM
0

Good question. I pretty much never encounter any of these radical feminist types in my day to day life and I interact with a huge cross section of society. I think some people just want someone else to blame to avoid personal responsibility. Its always easier to blame an other.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 03:53 PM
6

What exactly is a Soyboy? A customer of of Alex Jones' soy products.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 12:00 AM
3

He also did a lot of cocaine
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 07:30 PM
3

The OP about whether or not she 'deserves' it isn't relevant to this reality either. Only the laws are relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 05:41 PM
1

Well Jeff Bezos doesn't 'deserve' half his wealth so she wouldn't 'deserve' it either. But she is definitely legally qualified to get it. He took what he was able to given the laws he could manipulate. She is simply doing the exact same thing as him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 05:27 PM
1

You are going too far off on a tangent here. Your original claim was that people that support socialized health care do so because of "feelz". You have not supported that assertion in any way. I have provided many logical and factual reasons why people support socialized health care that are not based on feelz (its more efficient administratively, its cheaper per capita, it doesn't risk bankruptcies over medical costs, it doesn't worry people about life breaking medical costs, it doesn't have mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 04:26 PM
1

First you never provided any proof of your wait times claim. Second you can't reduce the article I linked to a single metric when it includes many metrics. For me this single metric below is probably more than "wait times" (assuming the facts even back up your unsupported assertion) when measuring quality of health care. "The U.S. has higher rates of medical, medication, and lab errors than comparable countries"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 04:20 AM
1

They aren't direct metrics of the healthcare quality though. Neither is "Wait times" which you just referenced as an anecdote and didn't even provide proof to support your claim. Let's say I can afford pricier drugs and I only care about expediency. Why should I want a socialized health care system? Not even sure how this is relevant to your original claim that its all based on feelz. As I said I just gave you plenty of factual and logical reasons for supporting socialized health care. If you wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 04:14 AM
1

First I don't find wait times to be all that important and certainly not a better indicator of quality of health care than the dozen metrics I linked. Also you'd have to link actual proof as I did for me to even take your claim as legit. Second, I just gave you a lot of factual and logical reasons to support "socialized health care" over privatizing the profits from health insurance. So you would have to link a specific quote from a specific person that is entirely based on "feelz" and restrict …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 04:06 AM
1

You can't measure the "quality of the system" overall though. Its impossible. I can only speak to my personal experience and I'd take Canadian health care over US if I had the choice. My experience with private US health care has been utter shit. And either way, I've disproven your original claim that people that support socialized health care do so based on "feelz". You might think different but there are very obvious logical and objective reasons to support socialized health care. Its not an e…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 03:59 AM
1

Actually it looks like quality is mostly better in socialized countries as well. Its very heard to measure this to begin with. The quality of private health care in the US has certainly been shit in my personal experience: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/#item-hospital-admissions-preventable-diseases-frequent-u-s-comparable-countries
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 03:54 AM
1

That's not a good example because there are many logical and objective reasons that people reference for supporting socialized healthcare. Its much cheaper per capita, other nations don't have to worry about medical bankruptcies and drug prices are cheaper. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-countries/#item-average-wealthy-countries-spend-half-much-per-person-health-u-s-spends In fact its probably the reverse where anyone opposed to "socialized healt…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 03:29 AM
1

You provided neither
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 12:24 AM
1

Example?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:55 PM
1

so go ahead and link your example. Looks like you are the one making the feelz based argument because your argument is not logical at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:55 PM
1

I assume you have evidence to support your assertion and your assertion isn't just based on "feelz" yes? Please link that proof
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:42 PM
2

Entire fields of research are discredited if they don't agree with the propaganda. Example? We have to believe climate scientists. When 99% of the scientists studying an issue from dozens of different specialties all come to the same conclusion, you can't call yourself scientific for still doubting the conclusion because you don't like the political implications. Fact is there are very few qualified scientists who dispute the consensus on man's effect on climate change. Its really just sticking …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:38 PM
1

Sure in most cases, but not all, that's probably true for casual sex. Its the "higher standards in general" that doesn't match what I see really. For relationships I think socio-economic class is much more important than gender as a variable. People born into the white collar middle class and above always have much higher standards for relationships than working class and the poorest of either sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 07:19 PM
1

I don't necessarily disagree with this as I subscribe to a nature via nurture point of view but from my experience I haven't seen any evidence of women having any biological imperative for 'higher standards' for either casual sex or relationships than men. All the examples I have witnessed appear far more learned behavior than ingrained imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 06:56 PM
1

I don't believe in defaults in this case. I think standards are all learned social behavior not inherent genetics for either gender since everyone goes through decade+ of socialization before developing sexual attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 06:37 PM
1

From my experience upper middle class men have just as high standards if not higher than upper middle class women (unless you are counting parents expectations).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 06:27 PM
1

I disagree but maybe you are defining aggressive differntly
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 07:30 PM
1

You think aggression causes confidence and decisiveness? I don't find that to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 04:26 PM
1

Why do you think women find aggressive men alluring? Its not the aggression they find alluring, its the mix of confidence, decisiveness and not being ruled by what others think. Unfortunately in teenagers and young 20-somethings those other qualities often come pared with "an aggressive" attitude. But ultimately its not the aggression that is attracting them, its the other qualities that come with it. Sadly this generation doesn't have many good role models for men. You have weak liberal pussifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 06:27 PM
0

I guess you haven't made it to Logic 101 yet in Uni ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 06:24 PM
1

Easy this one https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aGRAwGn_700b.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:39 PM
1

I think you are a bit off in your universal attractors. For instance, every study on beauty I've seen has it reduced to concepts like symmetry and relation to the Golden Ratio. Which is why in general men tend to gravitate towards the classic ideal of 36-26-36c because our brains are hardwired to find symmetry and the golden ratio more attractive. I haven't seen anything, for example, that supports "perception for low n-count". For myself, that sounds strange as fuck as I don't think I have ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 04:30 PM
1

Other posters are correct. By definition your theory is not a priori Also its important to repeat that ability to systemize is not proof of truth of a theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 04:16 PM
3

Where is your evidence that 99% or even a majority of men prefer a D cup to a C cup. That goes against just about everything I have ever heard about the ideal female measurements of 36-26-36c Most men I ever met prefer medium size C cups not large or small breasts
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 04:05 PM
1

You used a description of Jagger at 70 yrs old, and an article on Ali by someone that met Ali when he was 28!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 07:10 AM
1

You are just declaring one to be Chad and one not but not really explaining any objective system. What makes Prince a Chad to you but Mick Jagger not a Chad? Mick Jagger is far more a "testosterone bomb" than Prince btw Chad is not Chad because of the outcome. Chad is fundamentally Chad, and the outcome (i.e. he gets laid) happens because it has to. Or I will give you another one. Based on this definition Stephen Pinker is obviously a Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 12:19 AM
1

I don't know what Lothario means. Why would Mick Jagger not be a Chad? He was one of the most wildly charismatic rock stars of all time. Girls were literally just throwing themselves at him for years with no effort on his part. That basically fulfills your definition yes? Charisma so intense it requires no active effort to get laid? Multiple attractive women just willing to fuck you because of who you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 12:04 AM
2

Yeah makes no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 11:53 PM
3

You said Yes lack of private property rights are doing no favours for men. The stronger and three more principled those rights are the better. I am trying to understand wtf you even mean by this statement that "lack of private property rights are doing no favours for men". You then just said "taxes" I can't make a strawmen because I don't even know wtf your argument even is
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 11:50 PM
1

How about some examples? What pro athletes and famous people qualify as Chad and which do not? Wilt Chamberlain was Chad yes? Was Mick Jagger Chad? Prince? Muhammad Ali? Kobe Bryant?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 10:07 PM
2

So what? That's my question. Not sure what your argument or point is. Men pay taxes so taxes are unfair to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 10:04 PM
4

Only men pay taxes? Not sure what you are trying to say here That because traditional families have men making money and women staying home that taxes are unfair to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 09:44 PM
1

Most of the extreme politicals I meet are married or in some long term civil union thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 08:10 PM
5

I think you are getting making assertions confused with proving the assertions you make.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 08:07 PM
4

How are men "not really part of society"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 08:06 PM
9

You cant just declare something is scientific. Its your assertion so its on you to prove its scientific not on the audience to disprove your assertion
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 04:17 PM
6

No. Its normal for 18-25 to date without focusing on marriage. In fact I think trying to focus too much on "girl you want to marry" is probably doing more harm than good.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 04:15 PM
3

What are examples of lack of property rights that are doing no favors for men? Im not seeing the connection there
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 04:13 PM
2

Do you have sources comparing for instance: kids with one biological parent and one loving stepfather/mother, healthy adopted kids, children raised by other family members such as grandparents or aunts and uncles? All the groups above listed are just as good as two loving biological parents and in fact, far better than two shitty biological parents as other people I knew. Some people have one or two shitty parents and are better off with other loving family members. So link some articles support…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 11:31 AM
4

Children are raised best when they are raised by two loving adults. Doesn't have to be biological. Funny how you say no need to patronize yet there your tone is quite patronizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 11:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter