TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CopeDestroyer1 Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by CopeDestroyer1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

No, I have no reason to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:34 PM
–

It's not the same; the world has changed and being a priest now is an escape from the unbearable reality into comforting fantasy, not an ascendance from the fallen world into the light of high truth. It sucks, but God is dead and priests are custodians of empty tombs nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:18 PM
–

I had women actually be interested in me and I was completely numb to them and their advances. I do not care anymore, I have completely moved past sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:16 PM
–

A lifetime of celibacy has made me utterly immune to lust. Had I been born several centuries ago, I would have been a superlative priest, dedicating all my time to theology and meditative prayer. My sainthood and ascendance to the highest heavens would have been guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:06 PM
–

GOP is currently beset by a neofascist movement, so a lot of classical liberal positions do not apply anymore, but again, liberalism was never inherently cosmopolitan and universal, as USA were founded on it when racist slavery and timocratic voting was still going on. Liberal principles apply only to those perceived as the in-group, so it always was. Invading Iraq isn't liberal either. My sweet summer child, it very much is liberal. You were brainwashed by the liberal propaganda to believe libe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:59 PM
–

They very much are liberal, but to their own in-groups and with a healthy dose of racist patriarchy; cosmopolitanism is not an inherent or necessary aspect of liberalism, as American liberals of both sides are imperialists who gladly overthrow foreign cultures they deemed "primitive" in order to establish liberal regime, i.e. "bring democracy to Iraq".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:40 PM
–

"Liberals vs. Conservatives" is a false distinction; both are liberals, just two different strains, progressive and classical, respectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:27 PM
1

That's very true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:39 PM
1

Sure, let's call it that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:34 PM
1

Sure, can't deny that, but that says nothing about the leader and everything about the masses, who want you to be a slave to their collective self-interest and oppose and punish you if they don't consider you to be, even if you are. Using the collective social approval as a measure of your self-worth is fundamentally stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:29 PM
1

Completely true, but that doesn't go against what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:14 PM
1

How did you conclude that it "doesn't work" (whatever that means) because it brings resentment? All hierarchies produce resentment in the hearts of the subordinated classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:08 PM
1

Not so, just like the pater familias is above everyone else in the household, yet still not isolated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:57 PM
1

Not isolated, elevated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:45 PM
–

Who's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:42 PM
–

Lol, but I do want to be alone. In an ideal world, I would have no equals, just subjects and enemies. Also, that's a quote, not a meme, silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:42 PM
–

Not at all, just completely ignored and sidelined, while I dominate the minds of everyone as the only important person around, sort of like a dictator of a developing state who achieved monopoly over all the relevant media and constantly televises himself while denying the media space to his political opposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:33 PM
–

Contests of skills, like debates, popularity, sports, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:20 PM
–

Whatever it is I am currently involved in.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:17 PM
–

It's not enough for me to win; others must lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:08 PM
2

Reactionary is reactionism. Yes and the current most popular branch of conservative politics. Liberals want more changes and improvements and less tariffs and government control. Sure? Reformism is still pro-status quo. Also, it's funny how these things used to be conservative topics before the current reactionary wave. They are out of political system, they don't agitate or vote. Political system isn't voting, political system is the society in which you live in and its decision-making values, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:29 PM
1

Rooting for status quo is conservative. No, it is liberal, as the status quo are currently liberal republics, which is why the biggest wave of conservatism is reactionary fascism nowadays. Most people prefer staying out of politics even if they wish improvements or reverting back to good old days You can't participate in a system and "stay out" of the system. The reason most such people view themselves as "apolitical" is because their political beliefs are so permeating and fundamental, they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:08 PM
2

*most people are for the status quo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 03:57 PM
2

Like, sure, people (not just women) want the best picking for themselves and are sometimes prone to monkey-branching and cheating because of it, but it's nowhere near as frequent as you describe it, because, if we assume that the goal is optimal, longterm investment by a high-value man, then this strategy for the woman in question is completely useless. It's the same with having a career versus jumping from a gig to a gig; only the former is going to allow you a consistent flow of income and tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 03:06 PM
–

Ah, yet another beautiful day of Epstein's files never being released, like they won't, because people are ignorant wishful thinkers who don't understand how politics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 03:54 PM
2

Whatever ya say, sexless boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:16 PM
2

Believe me, I do. In the hierarchy of masculinity, I am your superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:02 PM
2

Call me when you finally have your own much-desired sex slave ✌🏼
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 07:27 PM
2

I did disprove you, you just moved the goalposts multiple times. Mass enslavement of women is a possibility the same way me winning a lottery ten times in a row is a possibility and you choosing this to be the hill you are willing to die on is a very, very weak outlook. Also, the onus is on the one making a positive claim to prove it, which, so far, you haven't done, you just warped every argument to come back down to physical strength, literally the only thing men have over women, because ackno…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 10:07 AM
2

The point is that Trump's election isn't that out of the left field. There were worse people than him and still nothing happened. Lol, look who's talking. And what authority do you have when you so confidently speak of the rising possibility of mass female enslavement? What education in history, sociology, economy and psychology do you have? None, the answer is none. You are a bitter incel with a revenge fantasy spawned from his feelings of emasculation and inferiority, trying to fearmonger his …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 09:30 AM
–

Lol, tell me you only read TikTok reels without telling me. Books are free, dawg. Read some.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:20 AM
–

Every reality was once only fantasy. Lol, what a cheap cop-out. America is divided, yet managed to elect a rapist president. I think a lot more than that is possible. America elected Thomas Jefferson too, who was an actual slaveowner. Bill Clinton was also a rapist and possibly many other presidents. Trump isn't any worse than them, so you are massively overestimating the effect his election has. It certainly won't ever result in mass enslavement of women. But I think you've exhausted your argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:19 AM
3

It already happened in Iran and Afghanistan. Not remotely the same. Afghanistan is a tribal society in a bumfuck of nowhere and Iran never had the chance to properly develop into a liberal republic due to American foreign policy. Would you consider China to be liberal? Would you consider it stable? I don't know much about Chinese internal affairs and how it differs from USSR, for example, to give a definite answer, but USSR, rather famously, imploded under its own inefficiencies spawned by dirig…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:24 PM
2

It's unlikely to be needed because women are unlikely to resist. More likely than not women would just surrender their rights without putting up an actual fight. I have no reason to believe this, especially in the heavyhanded scenario of men just outright declaring complete enslavement of women. It's exactly why, even if this scenario actually happened, it would fail at the very beginning, because enslaving half of the total population would be a logistical nightmare, especially since many men w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:07 PM
3

Guns aren't the equalizer. Machine guns are heavy and bandoliers full of ammo are also heavy. The physical effort currently required to load tanks and aircraft isn't possible for the average woman. Sure, but so what? Are you insinuating that a whole military force will be deployed to forcibly enslave women, including machine guns, tanks and aircrafts? Because that's completely wack. What's far likelier to happen is the Iran scenario. Are there any doctrines which are demonstrably not "shaky"? Ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 03:58 PM
2

And that's gonna happen in stable republics when? If physical force is all it takes, then why do powers that be spend so much energy into making sure we believe they are legitimate authorities who rule through popular consent? Why do they go through so much effort to give legitimacy to their coercive power, instead of simply doing it without any explanation? The thing is, there is a lot more going into power dynamics than mere physical force, but I understand incels are tied to it because it is …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 02:07 PM
2

No, that's a moronic reductionism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:31 AM
3

Andrew Wilson's force doctrine is the concept that no matter how much progress feminism makes as a movement, the patriarchy will always exist due to men's inherent monopoly on force and strength. No, patriarchy exists because of men's monopoly on socioeconomics; men do not rule through physical force, but through social myths and greater hold of resources, both being interdependent. Besides, guns exist and they are the great equaliser, so the physical superiority of men is rendered meaningless i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:23 AM
3

He's gonna say "other men", since a foundational patriarchic myth is that men are the source of all procreative power and women just incubators for it. That's why fathers are considered the most important parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:49 AM
3

It makes me sad to think that India could be such an awesome place if it wasn't corrupted by such a rampant poverty and dumb hierarchies. Like, give everyone basic socioeconomic necessities and abolish varnas and jatis and India might as well become a paradise on Earth. Plus, Indians, both men and women, can be pretty hot when they take care of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:24 PM
2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:17 PM
–

Because in patriarchic societies, sexuality is inherently and primarily a tool of masculine domination, subjection and degradation of women; cock is compared to a weapon and sexual congress is compared to conquest, with men as conquerors and women as the conquered. A woman that is fucked (notice the brutality and unilaterality of the verb) is dehumanised, filthy and ruined, a mere cocksleeve and a cumdumpster. Sucking and taking cock are conceived as inherently submissive acts that define the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:12 PM
1

We won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:06 PM
1

Lame dodge, still not what's gonna happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:03 PM
1

Lmao, tell me you know nothing about politics anywhere, without telling me. Take the L and move on man; stick to what you are actually knowledgeable about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:56 PM
1

Bruh, ain't no way you suddenly brought up Milošević in a discourse about Epstein files because you had no counterarguments and thought that it didn't make you look goofy af. I guess you don't perform well when faced with someone who isn't a braindead incel, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:25 PM
1

Non Sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:01 PM
1

Because I know how politics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:54 PM
1

We won't, because that's not how politics work. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:52 PM
1

Let’s see what happens!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:51 PM
1

We won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:41 PM
1

Sure. And?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:38 PM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:36 PM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:32 PM
1

It doesn't matter what one wants, but what one can achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:29 PM
1

Ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:23 PM
1

We shall see
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:20 PM
1

We won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:18 PM
1

Doesn't matter, it won't happen, because you don't know how politics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:14 PM
1

Wasn't talking about them, but about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:09 PM
1

Haha, yet another lib who doesn't understand how the political machine works. Best of luck, since reality isn't on your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:06 PM
1

"Pressure" is meaningless without any actual political leverage against them. Nothing will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:02 PM
1

No, I meant they are not gonna release the files in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:55 PM
3

Nobody is trying to distract from anything, since nothing is gonna come out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:50 PM
1

The fact that an openly-slimy, nepobaby showstar became the POTUS (twice) is an absurdist comedy to me. At least the Big H was a passionate, charismatic speaker with gravitas to him; Trump is such a comedyshow with his semi-coherent drawling, it's incomprehensible to me that he is the vanguard of Neonazism in the USA. The standards for everything are really down in the dumps.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:41 PM
2

Not strange at all; both women and men find women more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:37 PM
1

My apologies, but I don't like Nordic phenotyp; the darker, the better. Also, either muscular Amazons, or thick Rubenesque ladies, please. Also, not into Christianity, only 🦅Romanity🦅.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:37 PM
1

Ngl, that man isn't bad-looking at all. Short and poor, maybe, but not bad-looking. He even looks fun to be around. I definitely see him in a relationship with a pretty girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:25 PM
2

Strange. More context?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:24 PM
1

Tbf, attractiveness =/= physical beauty. I think that's what people mean by that; sure, women in their 20s are at their peak when it comes to physical looks, but that doesn't mean they are at their peak of attractiveness, because attractive women have a lot more going for them than just looks, mainly confidence, assertiveness, self-awareness and the fact they don't uncomfortably remind one of a still developing adolescent, but a mature woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:23 PM
2

I mean, yes, but most men are very open about loving those tattooed sluts, even far more than normal, clearskinned, chaste women. Ultimately, it doesn't matter what women do; there'll always be a horde of men lapping it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:16 PM
1

Yeah, this. Try to fix up what you have, instead of immediately throwing it into the trash for a new and shiny thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:10 PM
1

Yeah, priorities change as you grow older; when you are young, you only care about the physicality of the relationship, but as you get older and have more stake in the system and more developed worldview, you care about broader aspects of a person, like if they have a good job and whether they are agreeable enough for a longterm domestic arrangement. Nevertheless, I get how the comments feel like emasculating settling-for; the guys described are clearly betalosers, since nothing stops one from b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 03:08 PM
1

To think I used to take ragebaiting trolls here seriously once upon a time...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter