TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Coppersqh Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by Coppersqh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh sheez, that's genius. Should I put my thick fake glasses and fantasy colour hair to better fit? Better safe than sorry.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:26 AM
1

Thanks for you insight. It's almost impossible to "answer" these phrases because, as the image shows, it's soaked and loaded, and to break this down, we should break the affirmation too. Maybe if I counterargued with the points in the image and asked for the definitions of "privilege" and why the phrase is being used in a certain context?
/r/MensRights05/09/16 01:08 AM
1

Can you give examples? I always think about the possibility of a third-party to see a discussion, so I am the most through and throughout as possible, trying not to leave a dust in their arguments. Of course, that can be done with mockery at the same time, but I enter the robotic mode of answers and look like a machine. I don't know if it's optimal/very effective. But the strategy I see so far that is working is quoting facts of the handicaps of men in our society and how no one gives a shit, wh…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:13 AM
1

You could have turned the tables by calling him out, like "why are you filming my 5-years-old niece?", then proceeded to call someone, point the guy out, get your niece away from that, and proceed to talk to other people. The key is to make the guy recognizable, even take a photo. I know it's hard, and in the moment, we don't think. Also, this strategy can be used against every person to create hysteria, so, that means a lot of men were victimd of that too (like, being accused of rape/violence i…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:34 PM
1

I can't belive that. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:08 PM
3

I always realised that, the problem is, counterargue with logic would mean (probably) asking for definitions, but I've almost never seen that working since the other party would just appeal to emotions through loaded question, like "so what about the raped women that you don't care?" or "so you'te belittling the womens problems with that?". Bear in mind that I just talked about male suicide and male rape (check my history). Any ideas? A group to logic/debate techniques would work, does anyone kn…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:03 PM
5

Why not just "Unisex"? Or, if they try to be inclusive, "all genders/nongendered". Simple as that, but no.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter