TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Correctrix Archive

View 8 posts and 309 comments by Correctrix on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A straw man, and not even a feminist one.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/17 01:59 AM
2

"Check your privilege" is a perfect example of an argumentum ad hominem.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/16 06:53 AM
1

Indeed. Some trans people claim to be relieved of dysphoria by transitioning without surgery, and that's great for them, I guess; but I didn't feel right with the wrong genitalia. I could still improve a thing or two about myself, but no one is perfect, so it's no biggie. I think that defining a trans person as a person with gender dysphoria is like defining a gay person as someone who is dysphoric (this word in psychiatry essentially means "distressed") due to being in the closet. I mean, sure,…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:16 AM
1

how did you know were trans if you didn't have dysphoria? Hang on a second. When did I say I'd never had gender dysphoria?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:16 AM
3

So you are "Transgender" over a time of a few years until your transition is completed No. You just invented that definition. If your true gender is not the one you were judged to be at birth, you're transsexual/transgender. This is from the cradle to the grave. The term you're looking for is "a transitioner". That refers to someone in transition.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 12:02 PM
2

Quit being a victim. White male patriarchy didn't make you trans. Any more straw men you'd like to smack down there?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:59 AM
0

What's the difference? Is it possible to be trans without dysphoria? I'm trans, and without gender dysphoria. Boom!
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:58 AM
1

Looking at their comment history, I can see that they posted the following comment, which is a pretty standard radical feminist argument: Cultural appropriation exists whenever a white person does anything that isn't explicitly "white," but when a man dresses up, acts like, or otherwise claims to be or becomes a woman, it's expression and being themselves. Is gender appropriation a thing? I guess that /r/feminism is more of a moderate feminist space. I know they are explicitly against transphobi…
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/16 04:28 AM
1

Was that comment anti-feminist or anti-woman?
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/16 08:58 AM
1

Haha, I'm literally listening to a podcast right now (https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/the-lesser-evil) dealing with the false accusation of using ad hominem.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:17 AM
1

That's a very long-winded way of saying "I don't know about sexual selection".
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:46 PM
1

Not to do with anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/16 08:51 PM
1

For each say that you have in it??
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/16 09:24 PM
2

Standard.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/16 12:07 AM
2

Because if they just said "men", it would be easy to give examples of poor men, black men, gay men, disabled men, trans men, migrant men, or just plain unlucky men, who happen to be in a worse situation than the very privileged feminist woman saying it. So they have to say stuff like "straight cisgender white men" when they just mean "men", so that the water is muddied as much as possible. They rationalise this as using "intersectionality" to take into account intersecting forms of oppression. T…
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/16 07:50 AM
3

That's a good point about the clothing. I'd only thought about the "sexist air-conditioning" thing in terms of different physiology before. It's true that skimpier clothing compounds the problem. Feminists would, of course, say that patriarchy makes women dress skimpily to oppress us.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:37 PM
1

I'll give you this last reply before properly giving up. The interesting question is why were you subbed in the first place? Because I'm a men's rights activist. I perused your post history for about 1 minute and saw you hit all the SJW talking points. That says more about what you were looking for than what there was to find. Most of my recent posts have been about linguistics, Brexit, and Game of Thrones. You're a transexual There are two s in that. One at the end of trans and one at the begin…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:24 PM
-2

This paranoid fantasy got voted up. Congrats, you've got someone to unsubscribe.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:46 AM
3

What is that, a screenshot for ants?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:31 AM
1

Yeah, basically. I mean, even a brief google search will inform anyone about a myriad of ways in which the brain, chromosomes, genitalia, secondary sexual characteristics... can diverge from what we understand to be typically male or female, often to the point where it's really a matter of opinion which box we put them in. For example, when a baby is born with a 46,XX karyotype and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and thus ambiguous genitalia that the doctors can't classify as male or female, and…
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/16 01:47 PM
1

It's not so much a myth as a question of how to interpret the phenomena. The existence of a multiplicity of intermediate cases is not something seriously disputed.
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/16 07:38 AM
1

McGowan previously starred in Ready To Rumble, the poster for which featured two men being choked.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:51 AM
12

My MacBook Air was pretty great until I split cider on it. (Ironic apple-related demise.) Since in the meantime my partner had copied me and got an Air, I decided to replace mine with something different, and the Surface Pro 4 has been pretty amazing. I don't think I can go back to a laptop without a touchscreen now. I keep trying to touch the Air's screen if I borrow it.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:17 AM
1

No. But the sad thing is that when you discourage a group (e.g. men) from a child-related profession, those pervs who really feel a need to access kids will still seek it, leaving them as a higher proportion of the men in the profession.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:00 AM
17

No, we just need to lose the anti-male paranoia.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 01:38 PM
16

I thought people might like this article from FreeRangeKids, a blog that argues against child-safety paranoia. In it, Lenore gives a few examples of the worst being assumed about male teachers/tutors.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:24 PM
0

Let's not knock down a straw man. There have been some shocking cases of injustice. That is not denied. But the average man can still usually expect to be innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:44 PM
7

I understand it was an intimidating experience. But you don't have to prove it wasn't you. It has to be proved that it was you. Just as feminists have made women paranoid that they won't be believed if they report a rape, men's rights spaces often post so many scare stories that men get paranoid that they won't have the benefit of being considered innocent until proven guilty. In reality, it's unlikely that you'll ever be mistreated in such a way. Breathe easy.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:43 PM
47

This doesn't seem all that alarming. The cop didn't believe them, but thought it was worth asking questions anyway. You might have been able to say, "Hey, they was a guy with a big camera who came by here," or something. But you hadn't seen anyone, and the cop didn't have any reason to think you were up to no good, so he just dropped it.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:18 PM
2

Single-stall segregated toilets are just insane.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:42 PM
9

This looks like some bullshit from TheRedPill, except lesbian. Basically she's saying, "Bitches be born to sleep with meeeee! They just don't know it yet!"
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:08 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:34 AM
1

cough Bearing cough
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:37 AM
2

Ironically, this post has no comments yet. ;)
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:34 AM
2

Don't be silly.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:38 AM
1

That's pretty vague. Whom will you address? How long for?
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/16 12:45 AM
2

I was just wondering whether you were married, a schoolkid, etc. Anyway, just remember that there's all sorts of bullshit online. You can find stuff by any breed of extremist that will push your buttons. Back in the real world, there are great guys and girls who can keep you grounded and help you remember that we're all just people. Get yourself a great girlfriend.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/16 01:07 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/16 11:41 PM
1

Your argument was that when YOU I've already said that my argument is nothing to do with my experience. It's as though I said, "The constellations depend on your vantage point. Right now out my window, I can see the Southern Cross, for example." and you said, "Your argument is that because YOU can see..." when YOU as a MAN had low T I never said I was a man. you had a weaker sex drive Never said I had a weaker sex drive than now. I had higher T in the past, and excessive libido at that point. Yo…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:27 AM
1

If T is so tied with sex drive then why don't the most feminine and most lacking in testosterone women have the lowest libidos, while the most masclunine women with the highest levels of T have the highest libidos? Why do you think they definitely don't? I'm not aware of any studies that go by how subjectively feminine the women are, but testosterone itself clearly does increase libido. In men this is cut-and-dried, and it's fairly clear in women too. There are many confounding factors (diversit…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:00 AM
1

Why do you want to disprove it?
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/16 03:26 AM
1

Sure. So if someone says that slut-shaming is due to the "patriarchy", point out that it is mostly a female thing and therefore the patriarchy is a rather implausible cause of it. But u/vtschoir was just pointing out that it's not just male sexuality that is vilified, and he was quite right.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:36 PM
1

Women really do slut-shame each other an awful lot. And a huge chunk of men do it to women too. It's an unfortunately inaccurate meme in the MRM that slut-shaming isn't done by men, when of course it happens all the time. Some have said in this thread that men like women who want to have sex. Not really. It is very, very common to divide women into A and B, where A is the type you take home to your parents, and B is the type you use and discard. Sure, men who think like that do kind-of like the …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:46 AM
3

This is a common trip-up for people trying to understand evolutionary psychology and evolutionary biology. Of course people who are infertile don't cease sex because it's pointless, any more than they cease feeling hunger or thirst because it's pointless. Evolution is not about the consciously rational. It's just about what works and what doesn't. That is my argument, not yours. You spoke of actual "awareness" and I warned against putting any emphasis on that, and encouraged focusing on unconsci…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:32 AM
1

Perhaps we mainly need to accept that vilification and shaming occurs for different reasons depending on the target, which can be a man or a woman, and that neither is a smoking gun proving that men or women are the bad ones.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:25 AM
3

That's not an argument though. It's like when MRAs point out that men are the main victims of violence, and feminists think they can counter that with "but it's other men doing it!".
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:11 AM
2

Chivalrous concerns about protecting women from sexual men predate feminism.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:09 AM
2

OKCupid's findings that women find 80% of men "below average", Beware those findings. The only mechanism to rate profiles on OkCupid is also a mechanism to allow people to meet. You don't give someone 4 or 5 stars out of 5 just because you think they're above average: you do it if you want to meet them, and most women on OkCupid spend their time trying not to be in contact with men, given the dynamics of the dating. So, even though it confirms what I've seen elsewhere (picture-rating subreddits …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:15 AM
5

You are kind of right, and those are all good points. But men do obviously have a higher sex drive. The effects of testosterone on sexuality are fairly well understood. I have had high and low testosterone, and the difference is night and day. You make it sound like the evolutionary pressures that have led to different feelings about sex are not what they are, but instead are rational decisions about investments. It can be clearly seen from people's behaviour that they don't have anything like a…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:09 AM
2

Not everything a sub does is advertised in their sidebar.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:43 AM
1

Oh, easy. One of them is a man. I've seen it many a time. I've had it; Karen Straughan's had it, etc. The lovely Shoe0nhead recently got called a man for tweeting pages of a colouring book to some feminists. To a feminist, if you're a man, you're bad. And if you're bad, you must be a man.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:41 AM
14

I suppose you're technically correct.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:59 AM
0

That's precisely the point. They accept state action where it suits them, but in other contexts raise the issue of a given action being carried out by the state as if it were a complete argument for that action being evil.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:48 PM
3

This is how to spin it if there is to be any hope of anyone caring: A few months ago, I had a verbally abusive boyfriend. At Halloween, he crossed the line. During a quarrel, he kicked and punched me, and even cut my neck with a pair of scissors. There is video of this. I should have left him, but I felt I was obliged to stay with him because of emotional manipulation over previous support he'd given me. I tried several times to bring myself to report him to the police, but the manipulation cont…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:36 AM
1

He should definitely do it as soon as possible. Don't be indistinguishable from these feminists who suddenly claim that something happened to them ten years ago, when nothing can be proved. Get onto it.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:08 AM
1

He wasn't an arsehole. He was just weak. People are weak sometimes. He already knows he should have been strong and dealt with her immediately, but that didn't happen. The issue is what to do now with a university that is victimising him.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:06 AM
5

You must b soooo smart, sockpuppet.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/16 11:51 PM
11

I'm neither cis nor male. Are you trying to satirise idiotic SJWs by speaking in their soundbites? The bakesale is sexist and inegalitarian, charging disabled black gay men more than upperclass women for the same product.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/16 01:21 PM
1

The fact that the "red pill" metaphor has been used in the name for a certain shitty subreddit doesn't affect the fact that it had already been used for some time by many people to refer to seeing the truth in society, notably by men's rights activists. For a long time, every Honeybadger Radio show ended with "Remember to take the red pill!".
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:33 PM
3

Yeah, those comments always come over a bit badly. I mean, it's a bit... Sees photo A. "Ugh, who would want to rape her?" Sees photo B. "Oh, obviously I might rape her. But chick A was ugly." But I know what you mean.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:22 PM
7

Men's Human Rights Movement. Occasionally used instead of MRM to emphasise that the rights demanded are not special extra rights.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:53 AM
11

TheRedPill is over there -->
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:35 AM
2

The mattress was where they were supposed to have had sex, and it was carried on that basis. If a guy carried around campus a pair of panties that were supposed to represent a sex act he'd had with some girl, in an attempt to harass her, wouldn't that be considered sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:44 PM
2

There aren't any amendments to the constitution here.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:08 AM
1

Have you heard of question marks.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 09:52 PM
1

it's pretty clear that straight white men have the largest amount of influence in western societies. You're doing women's studies at uni. Tell me, is there a men's studies department? Is it even conceivable?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:45 AM
1

The amount of mansplaining in this thread is ridic. You come to a space where there are people (mostly men) with a certain idea, ask them to explain their ideas and experience, and then say that they are "mansplaining" (i.e. explaining while male) as if that is some sort of grounds for dismissing the explanations and arguments you receive. Are you trying to satirise someone who is narrow-minded?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:40 AM
1

They get out of that one by means of equivocation: they simultaneously use the term to refer to a society where most of the top roles are occupied by men, and a huge construct that encompasses a special view of all male-female interactions. So on one hand they can prove it by just pointing to current presidents and prime ministers, and on the other hand they can say stuff like "If patriarchy doesn't exist why is a man crying deemed socially unacceptable?" which has no connection to the former de…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:37 AM
1

Sometimes. But read up on the "gay uncle" hypothesis.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:33 AM
1

We have to collect arguments from "MRA's" like return of kings or /r/mensrights so we can deconstruct them in class. Why would you "deconstruct" people's arguments? Isn't that a bit of a condescending prick thing to do? Why not actually engage with people as equals, and take arguments on their merits, seeing where not just theirs but also your own arguments might fall down? I'm sure your class won't "deconstruct" patriarchy. It will be presented as incontrovertible, like a simple observation in …
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:30 AM
1

That reminds me of Shakespeare's "Mercy on's, a bairn! A very pretty bairn. A boy or a child, I wonder?'" The girl = child equation went both ways.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:21 AM
1

Calling a boy a girl is an insult. OK, here's an intro to critical thinking. If someone exposes you to an assertion like "Calling a boy a girl is an insult, therefore being a girl is low-value in our society", the first thing you need to do is play around with the statement and see if it stands up to scrutiny. Let's change it to "Calling a girl a boy is an insult, therefore being a boy is low-value in our society". The first part of each assertion is obviously true, so you seem to have proved tw…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:13 AM
1

So I'm kind of new to MRA Call me pedantic (everyone does), but this irks me. You've just said you are new to men's rights activist. You mean you are new to men's rights (MR) or the men's rights movement (the MRM). You wouldn't say you're new to feminist.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:59 AM
0

a useless degree is not neutral. It has an opportunity cost. Well, so does an ornament. Karen's analogy already worked.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:57 AM
1

That's obviously nice to think, and I certainly wouldn't like to start having to eat meat, which nauseates me to contemplate. But come the apocalypse, I'm not fucking dying. I'll kill and roast you if I'm short on calories.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:56 AM
2

The important thing is that everything be counted the same way. So you can say that by very inclusive measures, 1 in 6 boys and 1 in 4 girls are abused, and that by stricter measures... etc. Always use the same strictness for counting both, and be open about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 11:18 PM
0

I really wish that boys with a deep-seated need to force things into other boys' bottoms would go off to a gay bar and get their jollies there, instead of doing it to random straight boys as a "prank" or "hazing", which doesn't sound very convincing to me.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:24 PM
3

That's quite badly phrased. Hardly any (5%) of the scholarships were restricted by sex. Of those few, sure, more were for women. The title makes it sound like four times as many scholarships are given to women as to men. What it's actually saying is that roughly 1% are specifically for men, 4% for women, and 95% to whichever. I would presume that none are really allocated to men: the small number that seem to be just for men are for sporting scholarships in sex-segregated sports. The women would…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:37 AM
3

just don't do it! Why did no one ever think of that before?? Many people haven't thought about it before. The idea that women can be perpetrators and men can be their victims is genuinely new to many people. They find the very idea comical. You're a bloody genius. So I'm told, but I stay humble. You don't even understand what a rhetorical question is. Do you really think so?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:09 AM
3

I expect you to make a fool of yourself answering my rhetorical questions. The poster's message is to take harassment seriously: don't do it, and report it if someone else does it. Your message is a macho dismissal of the issue.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:55 AM
6

And if that results in repercussions?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:42 AM
2

They should probably have made her less attractive, so that the guys looking at the poster (who, to be honest, probably have that common "hur hurr don't be a fag just fuk her, dude" attitude) can get their heads around the idea of an unwanted advance.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:55 AM
7

And if she's a superior officer?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:52 AM
1

OK, here's a famous Brazilian song in Portuguese: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lehoc4cqGkI
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:54 PM
2

So you're saying it's all self-defence, and you turn the other cheek with women and hit guys back. I feel you probably need to even it up a bit: be a bit less of a pussy with women, and getting in fewer brawls with guys.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:34 PM
4

That's not an answer to my question.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:20 PM
2

There are, of course, people in the comments are arguing against the idea that even in principle it's possible for violence against women (violence where the victim is a woman) not to be motivated by specific disrespect for women. I'm doing my usual pointless battle there.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:08 PM
11

I have will power and have never hit a woman. But you've hit men, right? Otherwise you wouldn't have needed to specify gender. Why do you think it's OK to hit guys?
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:37 AM
2

I get why you say that, but surely an equal slap back would suffice. It would actually be considered an escalation merely because of the genders. No need to actually escalate it so greatly.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:33 AM
16

It shows many women slapping men, but when the time comes to show a man slapping a woman, to make their rhetorical point, they cut away. I came here to say that. It's interesting that even when their entire message is that hitting men is bad, the taboo against hitting women is so strong that they can't even show it simulated once. And we're supposed to be in a culture of violence against women!
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:31 AM
3

They are Brazilians. Their accent is that of Brazilian Portuguese. Portuguese kind of sounds like Spanish sassily spoken with a Russian accent, with a bit of French thrown in. Their website is www.filmedahora.com.br.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:29 AM
6

Well, yes. This is rights for men and boys. I actually find it particularly heartbreaking when boys are abused. By the time someone is a man, they may have toughened up (and I don't mean that as a compliment) as you seem to have, and internalised all the male disposability, and maybe they are fine with it all. But innocent, defenceless children? That's tragic. Little boys taught that they basically don't matter, given little choice but to become a callous, brutalised adult like you later on.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:25 AM
1

I'm willing to believe that those exceptional women who buck the trend and get into IT are some of the best; just as on my undergrad Modern Languages course almost all the students were girls, except for a few lads who were some of the best on the course. I'm even willing to believe that women in general are better at coding when it comes to making it legible and well commented, in the same way that women tend to be better drivers in the sense that they have fewer accidents due to greater cautio…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:26 AM
4

Curiosity is good, and in face-to-face conversation you could ask the person what their word means; but you're online, so just look it up.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:45 AM
5

That was a rhetorical question. She just spent the time giving a considered response, and they just ignored it and said to go somewhere else. Why should she? She's not a servant.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:34 AM
1

I know lots of people think this is a really funny thing to say, but really it appears about half a dozen times on any such thread, so it's just old. And in terms of real-life consequences, it would be a matter of throwing trans women under the bus for the same of a political point. It would be like taking all the wheelchairs from a hospital to make some point, and thus saying a big fuck-you to all the people who actually need them.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:32 PM
0

Too soon?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:22 PM
2

Grants will often to paid straight to the institution in question, to stop people just pocketing the money, not going to uni, and going on a cruise.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:49 AM
5

That sounds exactly right. The problem is that it's a violation of due process. He's been found not guilty, and then a court order is used as a stealth sentence. With this sort of thing, you could be found not guilty of murder, and then have a court order requiring you to stay in your house at all times for 20 years. Essentially, the sentence will have been handed down without being handed down. I appreciate the situation the police and courts are in. Maybe they "know" he's guilty but can't prov…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:15 PM
-3

Why is this under men's rights? This Shapiro guy decides to be a complete cunt, and gets the angry reaction he wanted. I note that you have to reverse the order of events in the title.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 10:47 AM
3

I've wanted to get more into advocating for men's rights because I believe in equality and see that men often get a raw deal; and then I see comments like this, and I wonder why I'm bothering to help people like you.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:19 AM
14

Rather vague items, including 'having it all'.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 11:04 AM
7

It was more a charge of "Jew existing".
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:41 AM
1

So you understand that although cis fats are the norm, occasionally they need to be specifically referred to, and doing so is nothing to do with being cruel, wont to over-label, politically correct, normalising aberrance, feminist, SJW or anything like that.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 01:05 AM
-1

Do you actually care about men's rights? Because this sort of comment is what will make the MRM be dismissed as a redneck movement. It will never get anywhere like that.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:33 PM
1

Do you complain when molecules are cruelly labelled "cis" then?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:30 PM
-2

Because there's a thing called "google".
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:29 PM
9

Are you trying to satirise ignorant Americans, troll us into flaming you, or are you... sincere?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:27 PM
2

And what about "it has", eh?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:03 AM
3

The pound sign is just an ornate L (standing for the Latin libra, just like lb). For the Italian lira, you used to be able to use L or £ interchangeably. The ISO code for the pound sterling is "GBP" and is used on all currency exchanges, just like "AUD" for our dollar or "USD" for the American dollar. This is even more precise than "£". In editors like the one reddit uses, you can use the HTML entity for the symbol: £ On this Mac keyboard, I press Option-3 to get a pound sign. On Windows, …
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:02 AM
0

Women today are fucking stupid. [...] psychotic world of a female's mind Your example no more proves what you say about "females" than the existence of rapists proves the same about men.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 02:49 AM
1

It's not "women" being stupid. It's selfish people who lie to the police for their own gain being selfish people who lie to the police for their own gain.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 02:46 AM
1

They can't just not hire women though, because that would be noticed too, and lead to accusations of discrimination. So they'd have to just hire equal numbers regardless of differing qualifications, and pay the women at least as much, again regardless. To do this, you have to remove all rewards for experience, etc., because otherwise women's tendency to leave the workforce to become mothers will start to make your average female pay drop. So, those men and women who stick to a career will have t…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:19 AM
2

Yeah, that's an interesting argument that we've all heard many times, but it's hardly airtight. If the lower female pay is due to female workers being valued less, then we would expect them to chosen infrequently for important roles and thus earn less. Your proposed scenario would only occur if bosses thought that the work performed were precisely the same, but they could somehow pay less based on some other reason unrelated to society's view of women's abilities and roles.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:12 AM
3

I object to the the article's language when it says "negative pay gap". You can't have a negative gap. If x=4 and y=5, the gap or difference between them is 1. If x=5 and y=4, it is still 1. It's like "reverse sexism" and suchlike. It comes from a mindset where sexism means discrimination against women, and gender wage issues are about women being paid less than men. The fact is that sexism is directed at men just as much as it is against women, and differences in pay can benefit either group. N…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:06 AM
1

Do the police appreciate such pre-emptive consultations? It's hard enough to get them to take real crimes or real false accusations seriously sometimes, without going to them telling them that someone might say something to them about you at some point.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:36 PM
1

It's great that that altercation went well for you. For many men, it wouldn't have. Allow some to choose a less aggressive option.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:33 PM
1

Let's not descend into macho posturing. She probably didn't push past him with any force. He no doubt stood aside, as any normal person does when someone purposefully makes for a door. She wasn't a random meth-head: she was a member of the family. Violence from him would have been unwarranted. Yes, despite the fact that she's a crazy bitch. You don't get to beat people up for being a crazy bitch. He fled when the threat of a false accusation was raised. That was perfectly reasonable of him. He's…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:31 PM
1

Or you could just not be in a place where the same distinction that you feel to be universal because it's part of your local legal system, applies.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 07:34 AM
1

I'm on the list because I posted a video from mainstream media, about men being sexually harassed.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:49 AM
2

Haha, furries are hilarious. It's a pity their thing got on the police's radar. Pet names then become criminal "aliases". It sounds like the adult sister was there the whole time to make sure the cuddles didn't go too far. Two women and a guy having a polyamorous relationship, and the sister of one of them sometimes hanging out with them, is twisted by certain minds into a situation where a big evil man lures three females into a den of perversion. They would have charged him for his relationshi…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:59 PM
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3cgfr3/judd_apatow_we_shouldnt_need_bill_cosby_to_admit/cte70yl[1] You were right there. The other guy didn't understand hearsay. But you were not downvoted or drowned out as far as I can tell. or you know, the generic crap conspiracy theories that get upvoted: This is the #1 response to this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3echf3/story_of_the_boy_raised_as_a_girl_by_dr_money/ctdt7rr[2] Yes, that's conspiracist nonsense. There is to…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 05:33 AM
79

Are you really saying racist/misogynystic Pao memes I've seen references to "racism" several times, with no examples given. I can only presume they are referring to the characterisation of her as "Chairman Pao". I think they just need to consider what would be likely to happen if a CEO behaved dictatorially whilst bearing the name Hutler or Stollan.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:24 AM
2

I'm there to quickly pee, not have a nice rest. I would urinate standing if I could.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:04 AM
0

You must be quite the marksman.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:02 AM
5

Yep, I've done that when sleepy. I myself had left the seat up after cleaning the toilet. Since it's never up for any other reason, I just went on autopilot. It's funny. I can't believe some women blame other people for their own failure to check. You'd think they'd be embarrassed and pretend it never happened.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:58 AM
1

Weird local laws on bars have no bearing on his sporting career or on the assault he sustained.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:46 PM
2

/r/justiceporn is full of examples of idiot, incompetent criminals getting their arses kicked by bystanders who are far stronger and more combat-trained than them. And people celebrate this as just deserts. Rare to non-existent is the fool who says that the MMA fighter who pulverised the unfit robber needed to let the latter do damage first, or that if the former were a "real man" he wouldn't hit someone smaller and less good at punching.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:56 PM
6

I agree. He should have grown out of drinking by then.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:49 PM
1

He shouldn't have been in a bar Sorry, is "bar" the latest slang for "mafia drug den" or something?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:47 PM
0

Imagine a woman being removed from her sporting or professional position for defending herself against an assault.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:45 PM
-2

I've never heard of it anywhere else.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:45 PM
0

The reality of consensual sex is that you actually consent. The legal concept is based on ages, jurisdictions, etc.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:12 AM
0

Definitely. On the other hand, when I had sex with a fellow fourteen-year-old I was most definitely consenting and it's a fond memory to this day. I remember feeling suicidal on my sixteenth birthday because I hadn't done it again.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:07 AM
3

Again, that's the legal concept, not the reality.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:51 AM
7

I think it should be made equal by going a bit easier on the men. Not in every case, sure. But imagine a case with similarities to this. A young, attractive male teacher whom all the girls desire ends up having consensual sex with a seventeen-year-old girl who is very happy about it. I think there should be some sanctions because of the teacher-pupil relationship, but the girl is over the age of consent (except in a few rare jurisdictions with a particularly high age) and consenting. It's just n…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:49 AM
8

That's when they are completely helpless and often institionalised. So they are exposed to a different sort of predator.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:29 AM
4

Well, it worked for that guy. I was too afraid to take action against him, lest he successfully paint me as the aggressor. Sure, for various reasons women are more likely to express distress and be helped if they do.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:00 AM
10

Yep, it's frightening how being the first to cry victim works on people. I had a similar experience where a GP became very rude to me, so I told him we weren't going ahead with the consultation. Butthurt at this, he decided he couldn't let me to be the one to just walk out, so he came round his desk and pushed me towards the door by the shoulders. I remonstrated with him and called it assault. I opened the door and went through into the waiting room, and he followed close behind yelling "Stop tr…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:53 AM
10

To discourage harassment.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:03 PM
-2

I love that video. It's hilarious. It's such a great satire of the different stereotypical ways people think. The exaggerated portrayal of my way of thinking has me in stitches. You've got to laugh at yourself. And bear in mind that it could easily be rewritten to lampoon the other side.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:23 PM
157

He/she/??? committed suicide in the end, He was born male. He reasserted himself as male at the first opportunity. He went on testosterone therapy and lived as a man for his adult years. Give him the courtesy of a "he".
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:16 PM
7

There are also several points against the mother and son, such as the fact that they apparently threw out the broomstick the son hit Solo with. They showed the police the stick Hope had been hit with. Nothing about the stick is actually in dispute. It wouldn't matter if it were a bit thicker, a bit thinner, covered in blood or totally clean. Both the kid and Hope say that the kid hit Hope with it. It broke on impact, rendering it useless as a tool. It is normal to throw out a broken tool. It's n…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:37 AM
4

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:48 AM
23

It would have proved that he was lying, because his claim is that they only made out. Her claim is that he forcefully impregnated her (i.e. that he raped her and that she couldn't have been made pregnant by anyone else around that time), and a negative test proves that this is a falsehood. So, not direct proof of rape or not-rape, but either result proves the tale told by one of them to be untrue. In this case, it was hers.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:17 AM
5

I guess after carrying it around uni, she'll get a job and carry it around work. Let's see how that goes.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:46 PM
1

I said men who are trans. I was perfectly clear. Women who are trans -- it goes without saying -- belong in a room that's for women. As a woman who has transitioned, I know whereof I speak.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:28 PM
1

There is no current use of the word "restroom" in standard English. It's a comical American euphemism for "toilet". You are not the only people in the world. The women's room in question is in Brisbane.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:21 AM
1

OK, whatever. A women's room. Not inherently bad in itself. You could have a men's room too. After all, toilets are segregated like that. Let's say for the sake of argument that a women's room is OK. Why the fuck are men who are trans allowed in there? That's actually a massive slap in the face to men who have transitioned, saying that they are actually women. It's massively transphobic. No self-respecting man who's trans would go in there.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:37 PM
2

Nothing to do with feminism, and nothing to do with relativism. People are designed a gender at birth. It is sometimes rather arbitrary, with non-consensual surgery performed.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:33 PM
3

Just a room to sit, relax, talk or study. So, a rest room, in other words. What it isn't is a toilet.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:29 PM
2

Are you saying you are no longer male if you're into guys?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:24 PM
-4

This needs to be posted to r/fatpeoplehate.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:54 AM
6

Because sex workers are always totally level-headed lasses?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:50 AM
1

when the LGBT tries to make it about LGBT issues then yes, you're going to get a push back. Making sure the MRM is not riddled with transphobia, homophobia, racism, etc. is not making it about something other than men's issues: it's just good housekeeping. We have no problem respecting your way of life, Who is this "we" and this "our" here, exactly? Are you othering me by speaking for all MRAs as though I am not as much a men's rights advocate as you? What way of life do you imagine I have? I gu…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:25 AM
0

I did that and found as the first result in the very source that you gave: [Forbidding a woman to be a knight] makes as much sense in their culture as making an official rule forbidding pigs to fly: it is absurd and simply impossible for a woman to be a knight. But anyway, it's fiction. I don't care.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:13 AM
-4

Source: Experience Was that irony intentional?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:09 AM
-19

That's not really the point.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:38 PM
-30

If you think you are any sort of "man", you are probably too early in transition to be acting (albeit casually) as an educator or spokesperson for trans women.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:21 AM
-1

A trans woman is a woman who is trans. There's no "becoming". If you're trans, it means your gender is not the one you were assigned at birth (by means of the customary glance at your genitalia). I, for example, am a woman. If I tell you I'm cis, that means that this was understood at birth. If I tell you I'm trans, that means that this is not what was understood at birth.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:20 AM
5

Feminists, crazy as they might be, don't just randomly walk up to people in cafes and start talking feminism. They do if they pick you out as ripe for the picking. They assumed a trans woman would be. If they saw a Middle Eastern woman with acid burns, they'd home in in the same way — "That's one to recruit!" Also she never even told them she was trans and somehow they telepathically knew and started bullying her over that In an ideal world, no one would ever be able to tell that someone has tra…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:16 AM
5

She was denigrated on the basis of maleness by them. This shows how radfem transphobia is rooted in misandry. Also, it's anti-feminist, which is usually considered on-topic enough in itself.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:12 AM
3

Brienne is pretty categorical about how, as a woman, she by definition is not a knight and cannot bear the title of "Ser". It's as male as "Mr".
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:10 AM
1

I'll get hate for this, but when it comes to women who are trans, both feminists and MRAs can be observed to be much the same. If you're all "I've faced so much misogyny since I transitioned!", then feminists will love you and use you as a poster child for intersectionality. But step out of line, and the transphobia bubbles to the surface, with stuff about rapey penises and residual male privilege. If you're all "RadFems are evil because their misandry leads them to hate and oppress us!" then MR…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:06 AM
3

That was the point.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:16 AM
2

If the idea behind equality of the sexes is that men and women are the same... No. I believe in equality (treating everyone right). I do not believe that everyone is actually the same.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:16 AM
-1

Some quite honestly I buy their "I am woman thing". Good, because only half are women. The other half are men. Don't use "transsexual" (no hyphen, by the way) to refer exclusively to transsexual women.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:12 AM
0

It's not an idea: it's just obviously true. Writing "transmen" and "transwomen" is as bizarre, incorrect and insulting as setting apart "tallmen" as a category separate from men.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:08 AM
1

TIL pre-pubescent girls aren't female.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:06 AM
7

Just imagine a guy saying that he uses his daughter as a tool to make the world better for guys. He'd probably be arrested.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:28 AM
1

Hmm, I've never heard of it happening, but it could. What if the OP were a woman who was given a place specifically for being a woman, and a couple of MRAs encouraged her several times to drop her unearned advantage and let other students have a chance?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:04 AM
1

Exactly, it's tribalism. What gender egalitarians need to do is oppose the tribalism of feminism and masculism, and support genuine women's and men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:00 AM
12

As opposed to a bleu or blanc one?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:42 PM
2

Above all, make no comment to the police https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:03 AM
-3

What if some stranger slapped your behind without your permission? Perhaps you'd knock him down too.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:46 PM
-1

You're really reaching there.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:44 PM
2

They sometimes put derogatory comments about patients in them.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:43 AM
1

Let me introduce a new word into your vocabulary: bisexual.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:08 PM
2

Isn't the post you linked to mostly pro-trans? There's a huge amount of transphobic stuff in that thread. If I were black, I wouldn't be comforted by a community where people mostly thought I could drink from the same water-fountains. Two of our favorites, CHS and GWW are women They're famous; their positions are well-known.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:46 AM
-1

He tried to rape her. Whether he might have been dissuaded later is irrelevant. If I plant bombs in your house, and you find them before I detonate them, I don't get to use as a defence that there was a message in my voicemail explaining that you didn't cheat on me after all, and that having heard that I would have been dissuaded from blowing you up. And they didn't even try to use that defence. Instead they just claimed that rape wasn't technically possible in the situation. That would be like …
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:53 AM
6

I wish there were more trans[ ]members of this community so we'd see more of this shit. I would be nice, but it is rather easy to be put off by the highly hostile attitude many MRAs have towards trans women. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/isjso/how_does_mensrights_feel_about_transgendered/ I've also simply had the experience of being downvoted by people who decided to misread my comments because they assume I'm feminist, because I'm a woman.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:14 AM
9

It's "Only cisgender women can be raped". I wonder if in their mercy they'd deign to grant that a woman can be raped post-vaginoplasty.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:46 AM
1

Only because a third party intervened. He fully intended to viciously beat her (and did so), and ripped her trousers off fully intending to rape her (and was stopped by someone). They didn't even try to say he would have stopped when he found he only had one hole to choose from. This attempted rape deserved more than the paltry four months, which is why it was later increased to the somewhat more reasonable fifteen months.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:43 AM
17

Have you ever found a feminist to drop a point just because it was debunked?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:56 PM
3

An echo chamber, but in particular one where everyone has to be positive.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:56 PM
3

The cover they are all whining about features batgirl submissively crying in fear. No defiance. No grim resignation. You are right that these covers fail to show the male superheroes breaking down in the same manner. What I would add to that is that oestrogens are known to move the threshold for crying. A woman crying and a man not crying in the same situation are not necessarily displaying different capacities to deal with the situation without experiencing emotional turmoil, but just have a di…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:48 PM
3

At worst I see dating angst-like stuff along the lines of women saying "men are pigs" when they are angry with a bf. That assumes I don't object to that on the grounds of misandry too. You are misusuing that word No, I'm not. you are insulting the Men's Rights movement. Realz not feelz, bro. If you need to believe that there is actually no misogynist involved in the MRM, rather than the more reasonable claim that the MRM is not characterised by misogynistic thought, then that's really on you. Wh…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:51 AM
91

The usual infantilisation of women.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:09 AM
1

I used to be a feminist, now I'm a nothing. Really? You have no position on gender? I doubt it. I hope you are for men's rights and women's rights, because you're for human rights regardless of gender. I hope you're anti-masculist and anti-feminist, because picking one team and supporting at any cost is destructive.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:43 AM
4

Something people always forget is that genital mutilation for boys has historically been far worse than for girls. FGM has various forms (removing clitoris, removing labia minora, sewing labia over vagina...) of varying severity. MGM has two main forms: foreskin circumcision and castration. These are both intended to control males' sexuality and behaviour. Castration in particular is catastrophic to normal male development and physiology, in a way that only oophorectomy/hysterectomy (which is ne…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:37 AM
2

"Are you trying to say that because some men experience domestic violence (although in a way that is much less likely to be seriously injurious or fatal, of course)...we shouldn't talk about violence against women as a specific problem?" Indeed. And just because black people get thirsty in public sometimes, we shouldn't talk about white people's thirst as a specific problem (to be fixed with drinking fountains)? Don't you care about thirsty whites? Stop trying to take their drinking fountains aw…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:50 AM
14

I didn't see any misogyny. I'd actually warn you against that conclusion. There is misogyny, in the sense that there are comments by individual people that are a bit woman-hatey. As Karen Straughan once said, "how could there not be?" If you decide that there is none at all, one day you'll come across such a comment or isolated article, and swing back the other way into being anti-MRA. Better to recognise that there's a variety of attitudes out there from the beginning. The important thing is to…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:44 AM
1

Read any feminist website.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:00 PM
-1

Tough shit, start your own media then. Americans who come across it will still think that Beninese people in France are African-Americans. They will still think that since most penises are mutilated at birth (they're not), an intact one is ugly due to weirdness (it's not). The issue is that some things are just factually wrong. The platform is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:27 AM
-1

Reddit is an American website Yes, that's the usual rationalisation. It's rather meaningless. Sites on the WWW (invented by a Briton in Switzerland) are by definition international. Locations of servers and suchlike have virtually no relevance. Where are /r/Rance and /r/Straya hosted? Does it have any real bearing on the content? What is the name of the language we are speaking right now? You might as well say that it's a San Francisco website and thus all content must be feminist and gay unless…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:36 PM
-2

What is sad is that "in the US" can be understood whenever anyone fails to say what country they are talking about. Americans are a loud minority, like feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:16 PM
-2

your response to saying there are more than 2 major parties [in the world is] to bring up parties that aren't from America? Obviously. I reject the assumption that all assertions refer to that particular far-off country unless specified otherwise. Your bafflement only makes sense if you hear a completely unspoken "in America" in every sentence. For example: your response to saying there are more than 2 major parties [in America is] to bring up parties that aren't from America? That's how you und…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:10 PM
-2

Examples of major parties other than those you mentioned include Bharatiya Janata, with something like 200,000,000 votes in the last elections; or without looking abroad, the Liberal-National coalition currently in power.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:59 PM
-2

it's an ideology advocated by one of the two major parties There are more than two major parties.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:20 PM
6

We never vaporiZed any city in Iraq. Either way, there's no need to be a dick to someone who is spelling perfectly correctly. Resist the urge to demand and enforce maximum Americanness at all times.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:19 PM
0

They would be technically free of all those frou-frou machines, and you could sweat, grunt, drop weights, use chalk, etc. Gyms with different styles and cultures are great. By all means choose that sort of gym. without someone there in skimpy Barbie clothes who's just there to get attention and be stared at. Now you're just being silly. Gym clothes are obviously skimpy. Look at the guys in a gym. Are they in suit and ties? No, they are showing shoulders, chests, legs, etc. It's just dumb to clai…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:15 AM
17

Almost all modern feminism suffers from Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:05 PM
2

Who are "you guys"?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:29 AM
3

You are utterly missing the point.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:35 AM
3

Of course it matters: the article was posted here because it was about a boy.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:26 PM
6

This article is from the interim period in the summer of 2012. Ah dammit, I didn't notice that. The Guardian suggested this article to me from the front page, so I assumed it was a recent article.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:29 PM
54

Wow, that's pretty extreme. They literally want an abusive practice to be legal in order to underline the abusiveness of another practice. I've never seen a feminist admit that so blatantly.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:26 PM
2

No, it's not hypocrisy. If a small man hits a big man, and the victim strikes back, no one says that he is an abuser because of it. There are plenty of "justice porn"-style videos of dumb robbers targeting a location and then being taken down because the guy working behind the counter happens to be a skilled martial artist or something. All the viewers applaud the beating of the weak assailant, regardless of he severity and regardless of how he was initially armed, because he put himself in that…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:24 PM
-10

Or you can just try being less American for a damn second. We don't isolate every example of your weird dialect terms and demand immediate explanation of them. We just google. You can do the same with words you are unfamiliar with. Anything else comes across as "I have a right to make a fuss about anything non-American I find". Damn, it's such an entitled attitude.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:37 PM
14

Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article. Hahahah.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:29 PM
-2

No one mentioned loss of consciousness. Dissociation is kind of... a separation of consciousness, if you will. There are various types.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:23 AM
-2

That's not what was described, but OK I'll take your word for it.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:45 AM
-1

I've literally never heard of that happening ever. Point me to a resource that states otherwise, by all means. But no need to get pissy about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:29 AM
1

If she is so drunk that she could not remember (aka blacked out), then that is rape. Some people get amnesia very easily under the influence of alcohol. I, by contrast, always remember everything rather clearly despite drinking so much that I can't close my eyes because I need to stare at the walls to stop them spinning. It's not until the next day that anyone can ascertain that the drunkard can or can't remember the drunken night before. So, at the time, an act is rape or not rape depending on …
/r/MensRights15/02/15 02:48 AM
-5

That's dissociation. Usually a psychiatric disorder rather than a normal feature of drunkenness.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 02:38 AM
-3

When you see (sic) I am an English and Latin tutor. So stop your 'splaining there. I was merely pointing out the original spelling error So, it was the second of the two possibilities I laid out: you can't spell, and thus indulged in a kind of hypercorrection.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 04:50 AM
10

More than infertility. The gonads are necessary for endocrine health. He will need to be on HRT (hormone replacement therapy) for the rest of his life or his body will feminise and he will be at risk of osteoporosis. Will she pay for the weekly testosterone injections and endocrinologist visits? It will also be some time before he is able to have sex or masturbate.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:14 AM
-5

You really just did that, didn't you? You saw a comment in which I note that I'm a gender egalitarian/MRA, and you skim through to find the adjective "problematic" with which to assert that I'm a feminist. Do you realise that feminists would do the same if you wrote a paragraph with any content and they found the word "misandry" in it? They would instantly identify you as a rapey neckbeard MRA redpiller by the mere presence of the word. You understand that it's idiotic when feminists do that, ri…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 04:23 AM
-8

I'm not interested in avoiding your trigger words.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 02:18 AM
-6

I'm not defending Wu. I'm attacking the bigotry in the comment thread relating to her.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 12:55 AM
-11

I've done stuff for A Voice For Men.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 11:59 PM
-12

I read the content for the content, but when I comment (on a small proportion of what I read) it's generally because there is something problematic. There is little point just commenting as a cheerleader. It's kind of funny when I get seen by both feminists and MRAs as hostile to them simply for advocating for gender egalitarianism (with an MRA slant, because of the current dominance of feminism), etc. I must be doing things right.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 11:38 PM
-4

they are not variety, they're mutation. Biology fail. All variety is mutation.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 11:21 PM
-7

Have you been karyotyped?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 10:54 PM
-21

OK, I thought this was just a place to smile at justice being done, but the comments here show it to be a cesspit of bigotry.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 10:51 PM
-2

Girls, especially young women, are infantilised(sic) Is this the equivalent of scare quotes, where you just want to say "Nuh-uh! They're not!!", or is it that you can't spell?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 11:06 AM
0

Holocaust. Good example. Specific laws about that are German peculiarities, for the obvious historical reasons.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 06:08 AM
0

It's an amusing peculiarity of one country. It's like if you find out that citizens of Bumfuckistan used to drive their goats through their country's parliament on their way to market, and now they're not allowed to. You wouldn't be all "OMG, they lost their rights!!".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 04:53 AM
2

The principle (not the specific wording of any particular local law) is one of no arbitrary punishments. You can't just lock someone up or carry out other punishments: there has to be a proper process whereby charges are brought, some sort of judgement is made involving something like a judge, jury, magistrate, etc. and adhering to laws. "Anything that happens to you after..." is not in line with this concept. Outlawry involves the authorities abdicating their responsibilities for corrections to…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 04:49 AM
0

We've been civilised enough since the late Middle Ages to know that habeas corpus is not optional.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 01:04 AM
18

Actually, Kentucky Didn't I say "modern"?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 08:37 PM
-3

Only the first of those is really a right, and it is rare to deny it to ex-convicts. Many democracies make sure that even current prisoners can vote.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 08:33 PM
64

Modern societies do not have the concept of outlawry/exile.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 05:38 AM
5

It's basically an endless repetition of "Scumbag bastards! Bloody cyclists! Fuckers!" etc., with some "Come on, hit me!" thrown in. She really wanted a fight so that she could be the victim when the police arrived.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/15 11:36 PM
3

The problem with that is that some people actually are masculists. "Meninist" is a deliberately stupid-sounding word, which underlines the satire.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:38 PM
1

isn't the term equalism? Dunno. Depends if we are still being satirical.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:31 PM
1

That's odd. Get a better spellcheck. Possessive forms such as "men's" should be accounted for. "Mens" isn't an English word, but it is allowed by the Google Chrome spellcheck that I'm using right this second, perhaps because it exists in the phrase mens sana in corpore sano, and probably other Latin phrases that we use.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:23 PM
0

OK. Well done, or something. Any word tat happens to be the name of a fucking company is gonna be autocapped now? More likely that it's because of the names "United States" and "United Kingdom".
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:45 AM
0

I'm asking you to remain consistent with your original premise, namely why if the MRM isn't adversarial, thus by extension doesn't un"balance" the rights of others, why does it need to be "abolished"? This is a completely new question. I answered the other one, and you are throwing this one at me. OK. I've made it clear to what degree egalitarian activism is or is not adversarial. I've made it clear that I think egalitarians need a temporary tactical focus on the area of rights currently neglect…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:42 AM
2

just seeking to conceptually bridge your disconnect. I guess that's kind of nice, but I don't see what it achieves in terms of the issues, really. Feminists scream about FGM all the time, even though it is already a crime in our society (all Western countries) and there is total consensus that it ought to be. The fact that they constantly specify that it is wrong to do this to girls (when they could say it's wrong to do it to "children" without bulking out their propaganda by a single word) show…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:25 AM
0

You're still not making sense, so I'm still not entirely sure if you are engaging in sophistry (maybe for the lulz) or are just clueless. You throw in another question that is so dumb that I assume it must be rhetorical, but the last time I said your question was rhetorical, you denied it; so I hardly dare repeat myself. Here it is: how is the existence of the MRM adversarial? I don't know what I'm supposed to do with this random question. Do you seek to know to what degree the MRM is "adversari…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:04 AM
2

How does advocating for instance against the circumcision of infant males take anything away from the status of females? It obviously doesn't. I can only presume you're asking this rhetorical question as part of the construction of a straw man. However, an adversarial situation is generated by the feminist approach which is to say that to mention MGM is to minimise FGM. A balancing response (focusing on MGM) is necessitated by this. It can be ideologically neutral but strategically one-sided. Th…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:41 AM
1

I don't know how that follows. When a group gives only one side of the story, another group needs to give the other side. If I fill my bath with only scalding hot water, I need to run only the cold tap to correct it; running the taps with an ideal temperature mix will only result in a slightly less scalding bath. This is self-evident, so you are presumably being combative for fun.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 01:57 AM
2

No. Here are the equivalents: womanist — manist (from "woman" and "man", not their plurals) feminist — masculist (from "femin[a]" and "mascul[us]", the Latin words for "female" and "male") femininist — masculinist (from "feminin[e]" and "masculin[e]"; note the extra "-in-" syllable in both. These are Latin-derived terms meaning "womanly" and "manly".) women's rights — men's rights (self explanatory; you can also say "liberation", or specify "human rights", or throw in "activist", etc.) "Womanist…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 01:38 AM
0

I am a gender egalitarian and feel that the very existence of gender groups is absurd. Currently men's rights is required to combat radical feminism You contradicted your own premise. I think that that is readily comprehensible as meaning that it's absurd that gender groups exist in the sense that it's absurd that they are needed. Like it's absurd that bombs and martial arts exist. A more advanced species would get along without thinking of creating such things. But as long as one side exists, a…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 01:10 AM
2

I found the hit piece very interesting by reading it as a sort of thesis on the psychology of a guy who really, really needs to see anti-feminists as pathetic and evil. Every part of the prose, right down to the description of Max's polo shirts, is crafted to indicate scorn and disdain, and work to construct a threat narrative.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:33 PM
2

Cataract surgery necessitates or rather causes you to be recognised as a seeing person rather than as a blind person. It changes the categorisation that people use for you. No one insists on calling you blind for ever because you needed surgery to see, or says your eyes aren't "real" or don't count as eyes. If you base your gendering of people on genitalia, then it is odd to fix the evaluation at some past moment. Especially since we all have primitive female genitalia in utero. I've never neede…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:10 AM
2

You might as well say that someone with cataract surgery (which involves a lens implant) is blind because their working eyes aren't real and therefore don't count.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:16 AM
2

Transitioning is an impossibility. You cannot, by any means, become a woman. You cannot become a woman. I didn't become a woman. I was born a woman (well, a girl) with a mostly male body. I fixed this problem, so that I'm now a woman in a woman's body. The current theory is that the sex of the brain is set in utero and is usually congruent with other sexually dimorphic parts of the body, which is why most people gravitate towards a certain gender, and assigning someone arbitrarily (after noncons…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:10 AM
3

[...] and saying I'm not really a man is just trash-talking. So that sort of denial is just insulting. I don't consider what I've said to be an insult. [...] There's nothing insulting about the comparison [with pantomime dames]. Then you try to deny you're insulting. You do consider denying someone's gender to be insulting. You are trying to insult women whom you know to have transitioned by saying they are acting, in disguise, etc. I happen to have transitioned, so your insults about pantomimes…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:32 PM
2

And their arguments are that women are born women and socialized as girls. They believe that female socialisation is an ending horror of oppression, and that this oppression is fundamentally what it is to be a woman. Man=demon; woman=martyr. It's just silly. But generally I wear clothes that communicate that I am male So you wear a male disguise. You're a pussy, not a man. Your male clothing is therefore a disguise. People can insult each other like this, but it doesn't get anyone anywhere. I ga…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:27 PM
2

I have actual biological body parts that make me female. But he would still like to insult me and anyone else who admits to having transitioned. So I'll continue to insult him. Let's say he's not a real man because he's a total pussy. See how people can just insult each other online? Isn't it better not to do this?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:30 PM
2

But you didn't say anything about being raised in a certain way, etc; you said "not an actual woman" and made no argument to connect the ideas. You probably are wearing a "man disguise" right now, as you seem to be implying that gendered clothing is the same as a disguise. This can only be guessed at, as you make no argument or definitions. I read your comment last night as I sat around in a singlet finishing off a card game with my partner before going to bed. The idea that I was in a pantomime…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:24 PM
7

transsexuals are not actual women, and are engaged in pantomime. OK. You're not an actual man, and are engaged in pantomime. Anyone can just make an insulting statement like that.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:09 PM
0

The only political party in the UK that supports men is UKIP. But can we vote for a party that will destroy pretty much everything else?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:03 AM
18

To be honest, giving birth to a man would be a bit alarming. You'd need a caesarian at least.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:59 AM
16

It's a total myth that looks matter less to women. On the whole, men are actually much more ruthlessly filtered out for not meeting the physical criteria. Thank you! I really don't know how people can look at this evidence of women judging most men to not be sufficiently attractive and see it as women not caring about looks. It shows that we do care a lot, whereas men will settle for less beauty.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:37 AM
0

Reads like satire. Even feminists aren't that nuts, right? Got to be fake.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:18 AM
-1

And "normal" for right-handed, and "normal" for able-bodied, and "normal" for fertile, and "normal" for not having arthritis, and "normal" for literate, and "normal" for non-Aboriginal, and "normal" for gynecentric. What an expressive command of the English language you have!
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:56 PM
-1

Cisgender and heterosexual are not the same thing. Ah good, someone gets it. But you're right, we already had a perfectly good word to describe that: normal. Oh, I spoke too soon. By your logic, we already have a perfectly good word to describe people who are not gay: normal.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:16 PM
2

Being for someone's rights does not imply being against someone else's. For example, I am a vegetarian and for animal rights and welfare. Animals shouldn't be mistreated. However, I am a human with human bias, and fully believe in favouring humans. If I were starving, I would resort to eating a pig before I'd resort to cannibalism. Being against animal rights is more than just thinking human rights are more important — you have to actually not give a flying fuck about animals. Men's rights is th…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 01:47 AM
1

Obviously they don't all hold power, or hold power as an organised cabal. But if you put together a mean value, the average Jewish person would be wealthier and more successful than the average non-Jewish white person, and certainly much, much more than the average Hispanic or black person. You can google for details. Here is an article in the Jerusalem Post saying that Jewish Americans are the highest-earning religious denomination in the US. And yet anti-Semitism obviously exists. There are st…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 01:30 AM
17

This is actually a very good substitution that shows how stupid the feminist argument is. Jewish people do indeed hold quite a bit of power. Not in absolute terms, but definitely out of proportion with their numbers. On average, they are doing really well. Way, way better than black people are doing. They tend to be well educated, and you just have to look at the numbers of Nobel Prize winners to see their academic excellence. And yet they clearly experience racism. Numerous movements have exist…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:52 PM
3

All you can do is calmly point out that there are gender-specific problems faced by men and by women, and that as an activist you recognise both rather than merely the latter. The incomprehension is generally because of zero-sum thinking, where they assume that because you recognise men's issues you must believe that women never face sexism.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:22 AM
31

When couples commit crimes, it is sadly standard to assume the woman is forced into it by the man. This woman had six weeks to just step out of the room and inform any passing maid about what was going on.
/r/PussyPass23/01/15 11:55 AM
1

Why are you bringing religion into this discussion? It's the first example I could think of of women systematically being denied specific legal rights.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/15 01:39 AM
2

Valid point, but the Hope Solo story is a bad example. The reason why people are glad to see her getting in trouble with the law is that she previously was given a blatant pass for domestic violence, at the same time as there was the incident of Ray Rice being hit multiple times by his girlfriend and then being demonised for hitting back once. Never mind "innocent until proven guilty": everyone saw the video evidence of her being the aggressor. No facts were disputed. It's just that no one cared…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/15 12:24 AM
1

Unless we trawl through the Arabic-language press to find examples of men taking advantage of bullshit sharia law, I suspect that that subreddit will remain conspicuously empty. Men in the West just don't get to bat their eyelashes to get out of a fine, or say "But I'm just a weak little man! It's no big deal if I hit my partner!" or get stuff given to them for free.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/15 12:16 AM
1

if there was a subreddit called /r/whitepassdenied that was full of people celebrating every time a white person was disadvantaged, would you all subscribe? That actually sounds pretty awesome. Same with blackpassdenied. I would get the same feeling of justice from someone failing to get away with appalling behaviour by playing the race card as I do from people doing the same with their sex. Just imagine it. Some person gets pulled over for speeding, and tries to tell the cop, "Hey, man. We're b…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/15 12:12 AM
7

What can I say to these teachers without coming off as a "red pill asshole" or "ignorant shitlord" yet still getting it across that what they are saying is not true? There is absolutely nothing you can say to bigots like that. You will only end up being failed.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:08 AM
4

Not really gender based. It's not even really a prank, because you don't trick the employee or leave them with anything. You just do something a bit dumb then drive off; and since you don't have a sink in your car, you now have a mess that you probably can't properly clean up. Just idiocy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/15 05:07 AM
4

It's equally odd in this context (if we heard her right).
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/15 10:12 PM
4

Yeah, like those gays dastardly calling people "heterosexual" or "straight".
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/15 03:28 PM
2

Guys, this dude just made a valid point. The massive downvoting is a dick move. Do you want an echo chamber like feminist spaces?
/r/PussyPass17/01/15 02:32 PM
5

I feel the same about sport. And chess. And Christmas celebrations. And... But you know what, not everyone has to be into the same stuff. People can do whatever the fuck they like.
/r/PussyPass17/01/15 02:21 PM
15

Well, it's pussypass accepted in the short term (look at those dickheads restraining the victim!), and eventually pussypass denied.
/r/PussyPass17/01/15 02:19 PM
3

I'm a woman who's trans. My voice used to be different from how it is now. Back at uni, in a certain class I was made to sit in the corner because my voice was too strong and resonant.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:15 PM
1

You're talking about two entirely different things. One is having all the man/women/whites/blacks/gays/straights/left-handers/right-handers speak first, which is discrimination (sexist, racist, etc.). Another is not having speaking based on hand-raising but picking people out so that everyone participates. I do the latter all the time when I teach. The failure of the people who don't participate is their own fault, but it's also my job as teacher to make sure that everyone learns, even if they a…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:03 PM
4

You are not a gender egalitarian. You are cheering for Team Man.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:51 PM
0

This is a tricky one. Policing is not entirely a physical role. Firefighters should all be held to the same physical standard, but there is a certain benefit to getting a certain gender ratio in the police force, even if the ladies aren't as tough.
/r/PussyPass16/01/15 01:00 AM
40

I am entirely sure that she can get action without breaking the law. But she's an ephebophile and can't fully get her jollies without risking trouble. I think people focus on age too much here though. Seventeen-year-olds are certainly capable of consenting to sex. I was very keen on it at 14. It's fine whatever the sexes are. But this teacher was in a position of authority, and that's a no-no.
/r/PussyPass16/01/15 12:57 AM
3

tl;dr summary: There's hostile sexism and benevolent sexism (the questions used to evaluate these essentially measure anti-feminism and chivalry). When people view or guess at someone else's answers, they make a certain link between these. Namely, when a woman answers such questions, rejection of chivalry is taken to be part of feminism. So, people see rejection of anti-feminism and rejection of chivalry as going hand in hand. However, people have a more negative perception of men. Men are seen …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:17 PM
8

That writer has some good stuff.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:31 PM
11

Since she got off with a year of house arrest for a massive campaign of harassment and numerous credible attempts to trick third parties into assaulting and raping the victims, I'd say the pussy pass was flashed at the judge and instantly accepted.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:25 PM
15

Was that a troll comment or just stupid? The politician is from the Christian Democrat party, a right-wing party, a conservative party, a traditionalist party. But they're progressives because in the USA the slightly less conservative of the two main parties has "Democratic" in its name. /s Strewth.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:31 AM
2

I think that people should get different pay for different jobs.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:21 AM
-1

Yes, and as I said, it's badly worded. "Gender itself" does basically nothing to the body — it's all via chains of causation involving hormones and suchlike. If you want to say, "Most differences in strength are because men have larger muscles rather than because their muscles are more efficient per gram," then "Most differences in strength are because men are larger rather than because of gender" is a very poor way of trying to phrase that. It's almost as though you're a feminist claiming that …
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:17 PM
8

I've actually noticed quite a few women working on garbage trucks lately. The thing is, they're always the ones just driving, whereas the men are jumping on and off the vehicle, running behind it, handling the bins, etc. And I see women at roadworks. But they just hold up a sign to divert traffic or push a broom, whereas the men are actually using heavy jackhammers or moving big wheelbarrows. So even when women enter these trades, everyone still somehow has the understanding that they don't have…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:57 PM
-1

You just worded it badly. You kept saying the differences aren't due to sex but to size. Of course the size difference is due to sex (specifically, due to the effects of testosterone during development, and ongoing effects). Your article comes off like you really want to deny that men are stronger even though you know they are.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:42 PM
-2

So I imagine you have answered/downvoted WillRob300 (the person I was replying to) for saying as much? No? Just me? OK.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:02 PM
1

How, in your feverish imagination, does that follow?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:51 AM
-5

So you'd remove some urinals from men's toilets just to implement an exact ratio? To what end? Waste space? Why on earth do you indulge in straw men like that?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:11 AM
-6

The male bathroom does not have "10 toilets and 10 urinals" as you claim I didn't claim that all locations or any specific location had precisely those numbers. They are round numbers used to show what it means to count urinals or not count urinals. it would be 7 toilets and 5 urinals compared to 10 toilets in the female bathroom So 12 fixtures for men and 10 for women. Given that women need longer for several reasons outside of their control, this is a recipe for disaster. one urinal is basical…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:55 AM
-8

It can't possibly be the norm. Those queues outside the ladies' toilets are not imaginary. I'm curious about this now. I visit a lot of public buildings in my job. I'm going to start enquiring.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:40 AM
-8

Really? That's odd. Does the building have some history of being mainly for women?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:58 AM
-7

as we all know what a terrible scourge so called 'man-spreading is I spy a straw man being pulled up.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:53 AM
-11

That's not how the building code works. There is more than one building code in different places and different times. otherwise it's the same Your wording isn't entirely clear, but you seem to be saying that the male and female toilet blocks will often have the same number of toilet cubicles. This is exactly what I said.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:51 AM
-10

You're embarrassing yourself by behaving like a feminist, knee-jerking at my points. Do men force women to dress they way they dress? [...] Are you responsible for the choices you make? The most cursory examination of what I said will show that to be a straw man. I talked about counting different types of toilets. When I moved onto the feminist's argument about differences in time spent using the toilet, I opined that it did not merit additional toilets for women. put on makeup? Gossip at the sh…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:46 AM
-21

Never mind the waffling in that long feminist article. Let's get down to brass tacks: Yes, the set-up of many toilets is sexist. There is the idea that a women's toilet block consisting of 10 cubicles is equivalent to a men's toilet block of 10 cubicles and 10 urinals. It's obviously not. One has ten toilets and the other has twenty. Waaaay too many places eroneously think that urinals don't count. This is problematic. It's mostly men who design buildings and regulations, and they have tended to…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:36 PM
2

This story is about an adult wanting sex and preying on a minor to get it. He was 16, over the age of consent in many, probably most places. She was not hugely older. I certainly lusted after people in their 20s when I was a teen. Virtually everyone does. The problem here is the disparity in treatment of male and female cases.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:18 PM
-1

If they are all around you "there" (a location that other people have had to work out is Israel, because you have been evasive about it), it should be childsplay to show a photo of such a set-up.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:04 PM
1

A simple, honest "yes" would have sufficed.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:50 AM
5

There's a difference between a teacher telling a student about consent in abstract terms, and telling a student that a specific... Screw it. Look, you already know. You must have an axe to grind to argue this disingenuously. Go and grind it somewhere else.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:49 AM
3

What do you think having sex with someone who didn't consent is?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:30 AM
1

Is that supposed to be some sort of snide insinuation?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:34 AM
2

I am seriously starting to wonder if feeling yourself 'oppressed' sets off some kind of chemical or neurological stimulant within the brain It's surely just a matter of people's tendency to divide others into friends or foes. Anything threatening must be a foe.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:16 AM
1

It wasn't just that his partner couldn't give consent. It was that she didn't give consent when he had sex with her. This is by definition rape. So, the teacher was saying the kid was a rapist. He identified him as someone who had just raped a girl. He took this authority figure seriously. He decided that his life was effectively over at that point. I don't know what his chances of getting out of the situation were, but they weren't fantastic.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:12 AM
1

Indeed. I disagree with MRAs all the time, and get some flak for it. But I've never heard any suggestion of me being banned. By contrast, I have been banned from several feminist spaces — sometimes for a single, rather mild post. They are authoritarians through and through.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:23 AM
1

Empress IForgetHerName Theodora, wife of Justinian? She instituted such reforms, but she was early, not late in the Byzantine Empire.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter