| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CMV: Mandatory paternity tests are a bad ideaThe problem is that it shouldn’t be up to a court or judge to determine whether a paternity test is warranted. There are also time frames that differ based on jurisdiction. If we had paternity testing done at birth, it would eliminate these issues. I know this is an anecdotal example, but I’ve had a former coworker who was forced to raise a child that wasn’t his. How found out after he decided to do a commercial paternity test when the child was 3 years old, suspecting that the child didn’t real… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/24 12:53 AM |
| – | CMV: Mandatory paternity tests are a bad ideaI’m not a lawyer, but to my understanding, a private/commercial paternity test typically can’t be used in court, unless it was issued by a judge. And in plenty of jurisdictions, even if it is found out via a paternity test that a man is not the biological father, he is pretty much told “too bad,” since he signed the birth certificate and is thus legally the father, even if he is not the father biologically. Personally, I think forcing a man to raise another man’s kids against his will is cruel a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/06/24 10:19 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Mandatory paternity tests are a bad ideaHere in the USA, we already routinely screen neonates for genetic problems, like phenylketonuria, galactosemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis, etc. This is referred to as “Recommended Uniform Screening Panel” (RUSP). Why not take it just one step further and test for paternity? Mothers are already guaranteed biological parenthood, as any baby that comes out of a woman is automatically known to be her biological offspring—with some fringe exceptions, like surrogate pregnancy. I don’t think… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/06/24 10:02 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter