TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Corrig- Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by Corrig- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Except that marriage would be worth a lot more with a lot less hassle. It's like tempting her to risk what she's got for a lot more.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:35 PM
1

Where was this? Where I live (NY), I don't think that's illegal.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:38 AM
2

More like theft.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:13 PM
1

Oh. That's because in the US, abortion falls under the right to privacy. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 154 (1973) "We, therefore, conclude that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that this right is not unqualified, and must be considered against important state interests in regulation." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States#cite_note-0
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:41 PM
1

Even if you frame what you want to do in terms of what you want to "direct your body" to do, you're still describing infringements to your liberty, not your bodily privacy. Freedom and privacy are two completely different issues and you simply can't conflate them in this way.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:32 PM
1

Safe-haven laws are limited exceptions designed to prevent infanticide. And I would imagine that if the father is in the picture you would need his consent.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:45 AM
1

You're arguing against child support generally by comparing it to indentured slavery in that a contempt charge can repeatedly put someone in jail for up to 6 months. That issue involves your liberty, not your bodily privacy. Even if it was a form of indentured slavery, which may well be the case, it wouldn't affect the logical flaw in the abortion comparison.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:36 AM
4

There is a logical flaw here. A woman's right to abort stems from her right to privacy over her body. The fact that an abortion also terminates parental rights and responsibilities is only incidental to her right to abort. Neither parent has the right to simply abandon parental obligations. If the man was given custody and the woman bounced, he would have every legal right to make her his "wage slave" for the next 18 years. Here there is inequality in the system, because, iirc, child support is …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:26 PM
5

If the option was on the table women would be a lot more careful about getting knocked up. I'm skeptical about that. Aren't the hazards of pregnancy and single motherhood enough to make any rational person think twice about getting pregnant? I doubt that people who shrug off these concerns are likely to be deterred by the absence of child support.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:08 PM
2

By placement do you mean custody? Because that would make sense.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:53 PM
2

Well, his possessions would be covered if he married her with a prenup. And then as the husband he's automatically the legal father. So, I mean, there's that option.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:31 PM
2

That was a great link, thank you. It looks like 12 states require that both parties consent. I had no idea. Bookmarked.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:13 PM
2

A wiretap warrant is something completely different. All I know is that it is very complicated. *Edit: Well I know a bit more than that. A wiretap isn't the issue here because the state, when it's tapping your phone, isn't a party to the conversation. So it's a different issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:09 PM
2

Even when one party consents? If that's true, how do Texans use jail snitches undercover operatives? *confused
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter