TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Corsaer Archive

View 2 posts and 102 comments by Corsaer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I understand that statement, but I don't get how it applies presented in the context here.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:58 PM
1

This is odd because in the past I feel like I've regularly seen trans posts accepted here.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:36 PM
11

Our education is practically a degree in symbolism, proof we’ve analyzed literary allusions and math formulas in order to understand larger meanings (whatever meaning means). Speak for yourself. "Whatever meaning means." That whole sentence is a throw away to sound deep without actually saying anything thought provoking. If walking is pomp and ceremony, why not ditch it and grab a coffee with the barista she'd rather shake hands with?
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:36 AM
2

I think women not being taken seriously when placed as lead actresses has merit as a kind of general trend of most female roles in popular television and movies. And this doesn't mean I'm saying it's patriarchy or toxic male masculinity or something. While having more physically appealing actors is probably an easy way to drum up attention/viewers I don't think that's an indicator of sexism, and I think a lot of factors go in to what actually makes money in the box office and on television. I'm …
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:42 PM
1

How do you like Zepps' podcast? I've never listened to it, but his episode on Point of Inquiry are my favorites.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:49 AM
1

Knew I recognized that voice. For those interested, that's Josh Zepps. I know him mainly from his involvement in the Point of Inquiry podcast, a production from the Center for Inquiry. He does a lot of political, science and skepticism interviews and has always come across to me as intelligent, well reasoned, and relatively hard hitting in his interviews in that he doesn't let people wiggle out of a topic or opinion they try to dodge and can usually drive through obfuscation.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:45 AM
6

Fraternities and sororities and parties and bar crawls are optional. And only one facet of the social aspect to college. They're completely optional. The literal point of college is to go for education. There are huge amounts of extracurricular clubs and events that focus around knowledge and learning or simply for people in your degree to get together and talk about it and study. Even these are optional for the diehard introvert. Not getting a college degree locks you out of a huge number of fi…
/r/MensRights03/09/16 06:02 PM
9

In the cases surveyed, men accounted for the vast majority of unfavorable notices, even as female critics remained roughly in line with the Tomatometer (if slightly more favorable than the average). They acknowledge it, and all the stats they actually point out say that men tend to review more negatively the female led roles while women review them more positively. Isn't this just basically that the genders tend to prefer movies that depict their gender more? Seems like an artificial controversy…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:20 PM
4

The 3 Stigmata of False Rape Accusations.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 08:54 PM
3

Wow, the woman tried to eject him at the end, calling for muscle, and was one of the most violent, was an assistant professor of mass media. Those tweets by them that are listed are so ignorant and bigoted. You can tell they slightly back pedal in the last few, but still won't totally give up their tired refrain.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:21 PM
3

I got no links, but can confirm. Source: read Ron Jeremy's (auto?)biography and he directed both the movie and I believe a sequel.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:40 AM
4

I've been interested in this since it became free for women, and would absolutely go out and get one if I didn't have to pay for it. With that in mind, I will say I heard one reason recently from This Week in Virology podcast that I hadn't heard before but think it's worth consideration (I'm sure there's a better way to construct that sentence). It's that it's much easier to tell with women how much of the population already has it, and thus how worthwhile it would be to vaccinate because it doe…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:05 AM
1

So, I am officially removing my title as a feminist, and I am a womens and mens rights person. It's shorter and easier to say you're an egalitarian. :-) Just be prepared for people to still insist on labeling you a feminist, and when you deny it, that you're an MRA or misogynist.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 06:59 PM
6

The person's view point in that list is sad and disappointing. I'm not sure I've ever bought a gender marketed product, why am I being teased and made fun of for shitty marketing? Especially when it's just the same for women's products. This could easily have been an egalitarian article about gendered products perpetuating stereotypes and traditionalism. A few of these items seem like joke items in themselves. Like broetry. Really. She even makes fun of men's therapy, and comments on fragile fee…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:26 PM
4

Yeah, I thought along the same lines. What a classy, understanding response that also gave no ground.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:29 PM
1

Here is an article, Why Feminist Frequency Almost Made Me Quit Writing About Video Games, by Liana Kerzner that I found very down to earth and refreshing. It's very long, in several parts, but I think it's worth a read if anyone wants another perspective (female games journalist). I believe I actually found it from this sub, but it could've been /r/games. Ninjedit: a lot of the initial points she makes are on the different types of negative influence Sarkeesian and her fanbase has had.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:19 AM
11

The domestic abuse call centers in my town only hire females. Looked into it once, possibly thinking about volunteering. They said it was so that their callers feel safe. My first thought was, "And men never call in?"
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:35 AM
22

Wow so she has the interview first, and says she only sent friendly texts and then Bird released them: The text messages released by Bird include one saying: “I am really missing u bird...” and another saying: “I love u bird and wish u let me look after u. Hope u feel better xx”. Those are just embarrassing. Then all she does is complain about "pressure" and go on to say: She contended Bird had asked her to sleep with him but “when I said no, nothing happened. I think he was a gentleman. I never…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:51 PM
12

I have nothing against your comment as I also consider both sexes to face inequalities, but I make it a point to tell people I'm an egalitarian when it comes up. There have been several times I've been told that either anyone who believes in equality is a feminist, or that no one should consider themselves as being for equality if they don't label themselves feminist. I've staunchly disputed that, every time, and maintained that I am egalitarian and not a feminist. I would dispute anyone who tol…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:01 PM
5

Shifting the blame from interpreting and carrying out religious doctrine to foreign policy. Saying you can't support all three--I mean a, 2, and 3--and still hold people accountable for their crimes. Do you even logic?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:00 AM
1

Someone else who has seen Zardoz? It's been a long time since I saw it, but I remember thinking if one can look past the sixties ridiculousness and actually ponder the implications of the different scenarios and beliefs in the movie, it's got some worthwhile social commentary.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:33 AM
2

Check out link 4 from the Wikipedia references, the title, Domination techniques: what they are and how to combat them. I can't figure out how to copy paste from the Wikipedia app or I would link it. It's from 2001 (modern), and from Norway's Center For Gender Equality, but is frustratingly written for only one gender. So it might be easier to read what the other responded posted instead of slogging through something from one perspective. "Today however, we are focusing on several techniques whi…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:00 PM
11

Since it wasn't here when I read it, the link: Master Suppression Techniques.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:44 AM
1

First two sentences they create their own conclusion, treat it as fact, and then say "Oh we don't know how or why, but psychologists and anthropologists will find the data to prove us right." That's not how science (finding the truth about the world) works.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:38 PM
32

as much as men were. You are being disingenuous. You're using the same logic that is trotted about to justify a wage gap: not looking at the whole picture and only accounting for variables that support the argument. Which so far is one, a date. Starting back at 1790 is not an accurate comparison. Would you disagree that societal norms have changed in the last 220 years, about one year after the Constitution was ratified, for men and women? Would you disagree that in 1790 men and women both had t…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:46 PM
9

I would argue that for a long time women were not in the position to file patents as much as men were, and that it would depend on when someone began to look at patents.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:13 PM
13

I'll never forget this time I was watching some TV show where they were going to test what happened when you got hit in the balls. They had a dude volunteer to get hit by a tennis ball at the fastest recorded speed, and they would watch his vitals. I remember them saying his blood pressure and heart rate skyrocketed to heart attack levels instantly. They go back down pretty quickly, but that's seriously dangerous for someone with heart problems. I had thought the show was some kind of extreme sp…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:04 PM
1

That's a very valid point and more relevant to the subreddit. I was mainly intending my advice as a rebuttal to the article which advocated mind reading, but there are definitely situations like yours where it's not necessarily going to work.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 10:30 PM
1

As any gender, just ask. "What do you like?" and/or "What really turns you on?" It will lessen your chances of running into a "predicament" and probably lead to pleasing your partner a lot more in the process. If they're too embarrassed to answer ("Uhm, I dunno..."), ask what they don't like. That is sometimes easier for them to voice if they have trouble saying what they prefer, and will still give you a jumping off point. If they aren't giving any answers, then respectful work on discovering i…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:01 PM
60

See, this is the thing. Hindsight is not 20/20. Current memories are not accurate representations of anything but the present. When we recall the past: emotions, motivations, opinions, etc, they are colored by our current situation. We remember things with the viewpoint not of how they were, but of how they are now. This is a noticeable and measurable effect and there are many studies that show this in married and divorced couples where their opinions of their relationship in prior years change …
/r/MensRights09/02/14 04:25 PM
2

While I do think the article does need to clearly define "trafficking", her claim of working with them on a regular basis sounds justified to me. At the bottom of the article: Kate Mogulescu is the founder and supervising attorney of the Trafficking Victims Advocacy Project at the Legal Aid Society.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 04:23 PM
10

You can only have one Fedora per group.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:33 PM
8

I had a friend who wouldn't even go swimming with me at a quarry because it was trespassing and if we got caught she said she'd probably never pass the bar with any kind of charge against her.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:46 PM
20

It's preeeetty easy to be anti feminist and pro equal rights.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:34 PM
1

Isn't that called an Argument From Ignorance? I don't know what that noise came from, therefore it is a ghost, because I can't prove it was something else. I don't know what that light was in the sky was, so it must have been an alien, because I can't identify it. I perceive that there is a difference between genders on some issue that is complex and hard to track, therefore patriarchy is to blame. Once identified it's very easy to point out and dispel with simple logic. Most people understand r…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 10:07 PM
2

You're supposed to be able to feel most IUDs as well, you just have to look for it. They have nylon (I think) strings that hang down, and are there for a self check where you make sure it's still there and in the right place.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:50 PM
11

Girlfriend got an IUD free, from that. I was blown away.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:07 PM
2

I really can't recall which one I've seen, but this or this might have been it. Here's also his wikipedia page for more info.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:55 AM
17

You really should watch it, then possibly edit your comment.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:15 PM
11

I've seen the documentary about him... three times through my school career, and man it is just as depressing every time.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:06 PM
2

I took a technical writing class incollege. If you've ever read an instruction manual, that's a perfect example of technical writing. I could imagine companies also hiring technical writers for just any employee handbook or instructions, and not just product manuals.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:37 PM
1

I would sue for way more than what a job would pay you, and I think even a decent lawyer could get you that. Not only are you missing out on income from a job but you are losing your entire 24 hour day. Your freedom. What price does four years of your freedom have for you, ladies and gentlemen?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:35 PM
2

Thanks. I'm just trying to say that I think not every example of abuse has to be used as an example of men's rights issues and sexism. There are a lot of posts like these that make it to our front page, and while I enjoy (if you can use that word for depressing material) reading personal stories and editorials that help flesh out our issues (sometimes we can have the opinion, but it's hard to coherently put it in to words), this seemed like just a pop news article to me, and yes I read the blurb…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:54 PM
4

This response is absurd and it's disheartening to see any people supporting it. Even if they would agree this article should be on our front page, you contributed nothing but heavy sarcasm and made baseless claims that I was unaware and out of touch with current events, both of which are flat out wrong, as I just gave several examples that spanned multiple mediums and topics.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:39 PM
-1

Yes I read the headline. Basing anything off a headline is meaningless. Especially when posting to Reddit you can make any headline you want, like was done here.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:28 PM
-2

Only parallel I can draw is that if it was a feminist receiving these threats, they'd most likely trump up their victimhood, attempt to get the law involved, and then climb even higher on their soap box and create an organization to help others recover from "Twitter Attacks". Instead of acting rationally and releasing a simple debunking statement. I thought I touched on that. Although I specified feminist and not every female. One of the current and vocal examples, and most relevant to what I ke…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:42 PM
16

Hilarious reading those tweets, but not quite sure how this relates to men's rights. Only parallel I can draw is that if it was a feminist receiving these threats, they'd most likely trump up their victimhood, attempt to get the law involved, and then climb even higher on their soap box and create an organization to help others recover from "Twitter Attacks". Instead of acting rationally and releasing a simple debunking statement.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:37 PM
1

A more correct title would have been, "Sherman receives C&D letter, says it's bullshit and won't comply".
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:47 PM
2

...dogmatic religious brand of non-deity believing. I just call it a gynocentric religion, for simplicity.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:42 PM
2

I see billboards advertising prostate cancer screenings as "Real men go to the hospital." and "Real men get checked." Not if we can't fucking afford it.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:03 PM
5

That was a very good article, thanks for the post. Touched on nearly every issue with trying to analyze a wage gap. From other articles I've read that the adjusted observable gap falls well within margin of error for statistics (which this article also seems to imply). I've also watched a short interview from all the way back in the eighties that came to the same conclusion when adjusting women's earnings for before/after marriage and childbirth.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:53 PM
1

Have you read the articles though? They are just as bad as the headlines and titles.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:00 PM
1

That's one hell of a spin.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:59 PM
1

I know recently men had closed the gap a little (because there was an article here posted claiming it was a cause for concern that women's didn't rise as much, male privilege, etc, of course), so maybe that study was done in the USA, or most sources aren't up to date yet.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:21 PM
1

I read it as well and while there are a few choice bits and perspectives, I would say it's very dated.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:46 AM
5

I interpreted it as once you define yourself as an -ist or -ism you are less likely to keep thinking critically and independently and more likely to just adopt the group mentality and mantras without analyzing and creating your own ideas. You may align yourself to similar trains of thought, but to believe the exact same as any group is to lose your self of identity. You can say you agree with certain ideas, but you did not create that philosophy, someone else did. It's someone else's idea and pe…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:35 AM
6

They keep using the word scientist. I'm not sure that word means what they think it means.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:08 PM
4

It's mind boggling. If there were (or are) women working in the manual labor field examples given, they would have Green Book conditions, and if a men were (or are) working in the nursery they would have Blue Book conditions. It's based on the job. Either this article completely neglects to mention any justification for this ruling, or there is none. I'm guessing the latter.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:57 PM
2

Don't forget the fedora. Really don't know where that came from, but apparently it's part of the stereotype now.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:00 PM
1

Kind of related anecdote. I live in a top ten college town and a couple years ago a girl went missing while walking home from the bars. She was pretty, rich, white. Huge banners were put up all over, local news covered it continually. You would go out of town six months later to a nearby town and when people found out where you were from they'd ask you about it. There's still signs and billboards up even now. Since that time I've heard of three other kids go missing, all minorities, and the most…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 10:06 PM
5

Margins of error or statistical insignificance, I believe are the terms. This DOES prove though that women journalists don't have it worse, as one commenter at least has pointed out they've seen claimed.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 08:36 PM
2

Same here, and you generally won't hear something like Chainsaw Gynecologist at Ozzfest or a democratic convention.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:45 PM
3

Apparently she's played at Ozzfest and was a speaker at the Democrat 2008 convention.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:41 PM
7

I think it's the issues with laws in regards to the male gender. We get punished more often, and more severely than women for breaking the same laws. There is a huge bias (and I believe actually backed up by laws) in the court against men for child custody, as well alimony/child support. We are also, forced under law, to enlist for the draft. Not to mention men can not be raped under nearly all current definitions, and if a man tries to have help against domestic violence, he will most likely be…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:24 PM
2

Already been posted on here. Woman complained that once she turned fifty she turned invisible and that men should pay attention to her and stop treating her like she's not there.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:30 AM
4

Check out the links it directs you toward at the bottom of the poster. They're legitimate websites.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 11:50 PM
8

I've actually seen multiple instances of this study and they've all had the result that men are much more generous in rating women's looks as attractive, than women rating men.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:29 AM
6

Don't forget magnesium.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:02 PM
1

Feminism is no longer about equality in any way. There are still enough people who consider themselves feminists that are for equality--though this is becoming a dwindling minority that only deigns to speak up when they feel they have to defend themselves from other feminists. Instead of trying to reclaim the title, or say the majority of others aren't real feminists (as those others are crying the same of them), I think they should make a female rights movement--FRM. I think an FRM and an MRM, …
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:55 PM
4

I do too. I would never want to be associated with what feminism has become.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:49 PM
8

I'm fairly confident everyone here believes people should have equal pay for equal jobs, regardless of gender. What we're "whining" about is that it's not what seems to be brought up as the issue anymore. What is being propagated to the public is that any difference in wages between the genders is directly the result of sexism. This idea in showing work place fatality differences by gender is just one way to show that there are many facets not caused by sexism for how there is a difference in ge…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:32 PM
1

I think a women's rights movement--that is separate from modern feminism--and a men's rights movement could get along fine and work towards the same goals of equality. One of the most telling signs that modern feminism is no longer representing equality, or has moved greatly from original ideas and tenets, is that most of the great non-militant feminists of past decades are either not considered "true feminists" anymore, or they don't fully identify with/support the movement anymore. I've seen a…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:36 PM
2

I think there has become a problem with modern feminism where it has become too splintered. And the biggest splinter--the ones that get the most visibility, and are the most influential--are "a bunch of female psychos looking to implement female dominance". I believe that is a sad truth. There are so many different categorizations feminists use now, and you can often find any one feminist denouncing other feminists as, "self-proclaimed" or "so-called". Is it really more difficult to explain egal…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:13 PM
1

I applaud you for keeping a level head through all of that. I like to think I would be just as patient (have yet to encounter this level of diehard illogical dogma personally), but you never know.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:52 PM
3

Not the OP, but I'm for more rehabilitation programs. It's just this is so skewed it's shameful. In the article it mentions they hope to benefit young mothers and keep their children from following their footsteps, and that they hope to avert more over crowding. But these things are just as relevant with men. Fathers go to prison, and take up space in cells as well. It could be argued that it is even more relevent to males, as men almost always receive harsher punishment/more jail time than wome…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:42 AM
6

Feminists can't wrap their heads around the fact that gender disparity--especially in niche fields--does not inherently indicate sexism.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:33 AM
16

Thanks, had the idea of what this was all about but now it's more clear. I had read the title of the post I saw about the original incident on Reddit, and assumed it was two guys being loud and obnoxious and yelling things at people. Not a quiet, private conversation. Sure, be offended by it. But to publicly shame someone for that, and to get one fired? That's pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:02 PM
6

He must've been held in cryoprison for a long time.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:56 PM
1

On my phone so couldn't access the Chrome store but I belive it's just called Google Dictionary.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:31 PM
1

I wouldn't know besides just googling it and seeing what that tells me. I just used a Chrome plugin where you can double click words to highlight them and it gives you the definition.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:23 PM
2

Rapist, I believe.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:12 PM
2

Parts of the first comment--and the response--sum the whole article up perfectly: Miles Garvey - As a handsome (;-)) Black man who is abstinent for nearly six years, I have some experience with turning down a woman for sex. Maybe the guy just wants something more than you’re willing to give. Maybe he wants a relationship of substance. Or, maybe he just wasn’t feeling you like that. Men have feelings and desires much like women. Crunktastic - @Miles Garvey, I appreciate the sincerity in the first…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:43 AM
2

Tumblr is pretty much the bane of any intelligent, logical thought.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:36 AM
9

I'm seeing a lot of hypocrisy in the comments. If arguments like, "Not all women like muscle-bound men!" and, "Just stop being lazy and get fit!" aren't accepted when the genders are reversed, why are they the go-to reasoning now? (rhetorical question)
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:28 AM
4

I would think we would want to make it not appear on the list at all.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:10 PM
2

Don't worry I won't! I tried to be specific in the title and linking to the source, so hopefully people knew what it came from and not create a generalization.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:24 PM
1

While I think I wouldn't necessarily agree that the word homophobia doesn't or can't exist, I would agree it's too often used as a catch-all for anything not agreeing with LGBT things.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:28 PM
1

I used to be friends with this bi female who would do, or say, really mean things directed at men--with no or little provocation--and then just laugh and say, "Oh yeah, I try not to hate men but sometimes..." or similar and try to write it off. She was nice and fun most of the time but then these moments would happen and eventually I just had enough and stopped hanging out with her.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:24 PM
12

Several of my friends posted this and it seems to fly by without anyone realizing what it's inferring. Not to mention that it's gotten a lot of attention on LGBT News's page. It looks like some poorly thought out Tumblr blog post they ripped off.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:51 AM
26

A day or two in between bathroom visits on a regular basis is not healthy. Especially if you're not urinating.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:06 PM
4

Yes, complain about your perspective not being shared when you have yet to even post anything on the subreddit. I'm sure something from the perspective of a male from any country, nationality, or color, would be welcomed. The text is not only relevant to the picture but the fact that "privileged white male" is thrown around constantly as an example of a double whammy.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:31 PM
2

Too bad the two weren't bigger studies. They may have limited data, but they seem to be conducted extremely thoroughly and accurately. Not enough to generalize with, like the article states, but it's still an illuminating number. I live in a smaller, university oriented, town in the mid-west though, so for my personal location it's much more related.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:13 AM
3

I did a search and didn't think it had been posted here before. It's from 2009 I believe so is a few years dated, but appears to be a very good critical analysis of cited data. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:04 PM
2

You should read more poems by Walt Whitman. He constantly praises the male and female body, as well as people, for just being them. He's like Mr. Rogers as a poet.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:16 PM
0

So you're saying we should not just blindly follow something, but take the parts that are logical and not obvious dramatizations or stereotypes, and draw our own conclusions? Blasphemy!
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:13 PM
1

I feel like the issues and ideas are still relevant, but to different degrees and in different ways. What she's talking about is something, that if it's true (which undeniably to some extent is), doesn't go away in forty years.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:09 PM
12

I would disagree. It's just strong language. I think he handled it fine. He wasn't trying to argue with them, or persuade them, or represent men's rights. He wasn't even trying to make an example out of them. He's even said he looked through their other posts to come to that conclusion. He left a single sentence with a couple of curse words to illustrate his feelings. What's so wrong with that? I think his response is a fine way to respond to someone who is insulting and bigoted towards a person…
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:51 AM
1

I wasn't saying it's not a problem, I'm saying they are placing the blame on something that would actually be doing the opposite of perpetuating the problem, let alone causing it. You can't fix or change something if you're completely blind as to it's cause. This wouldn't be an issue if I didn't hear women complaining about the image their supposed to have according to society if it wasn't almost always linked with blaming men.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:16 PM
15

One thing I always point out to my friends who make claims about the unattainable female image being imposed on them... is that it's not men perpetrating it, but their own gender. The easiest way to illustrate this is to open up an adult magazine for men versus pretty much any magazine for women. You've got a "healthy" size versus rail thin, respectively. And if they say, "Oh well it's just because men like big asses and tits." Well so fucking what, get that by weighing more, the whole point.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:47 PM
5

I've heard one side of the reasoning for the high drinking age is that alcohol consumption can have severely detrimental consequences on a growing body.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:05 PM
-2

You can base that opinion on experience though. I have relatively the same thoughts, but that's because every female friend I've ever ridden shotgun with has, at one time, made me fear for my life through lack of awareness or poor driving skills. While this article simply uses a stereotype, and one that is pointed out to be untrue.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 02:15 AM
5

Get out of here with your logic!
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter