CountCuriousness Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-24	The "rape culture" is an overblown myth. Every single woman I’ve talked to has stories about men violating their bodies, taking liberties that they don’t have consent for, to greater or lesser extent. From butt grabbing at the bar to uninvited hands jammed in panties to much more. Rape is a harsh word indeed, but I don’t think there’s doubt that we still need to have a societal conversation on consent. I once thought I “didn’t need to be told how to not rape” but after learning about it, I’m certain that a lot of people could need some…	/r/MensRights	06/05/21 12:41 PM
-3	Hey guys, I just wanted to share this incident which happened to me today. It's my first time posting here. How is this a men’s rights issue and not just you running into some rude idiots? It’s not like men in general are treated like this.	/r/MensRights	14/03/21 11:00 PM
1	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. Always putting women on a pedestal. Women are humans who happen to have been discriminated against heavily in the past, so much so that many women still experience the after-shocks of that. Am I putting black people on a pedestal for acknowledging that they still suffer from lingering effects of slavery and Jim Crow laws? None of the women living right ever saw any of the things you are talking about. None of the black people today experienced literal slavery, but they're still affected by the l…	/r/MensRights	11/12/20 12:39 AM
1	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. It is long ago though, like atleast a generation or two Wouldn't that depend on how deeply rooted the issue is? Surely you don't believe the grandchild of a person born under slavery should be expected to be 100% as successful as someone not born being considered sub-human? Women haven't had such a treatment exactly, my question is about how quickly a society can change. Do you agree some changes take far more than 1-2 generations? How long is a generation to you, btw?	/r/MensRights	11/12/20 12:22 AM
1	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. Yes, society changes very fast..look at the last 15+ years or so Do you believe black people today aren't affected by the fact that Jim Crow laws only ended in 1965?	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 10:37 PM
-3	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. You really think society can change so fast that young girls and women born in the last couple decades have no risk of being affected by bigotry and stereotypes stemming from 50-60 years ago? That's not even mentioning the facts backing up my statements, of course. Just asking.	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 08:00 PM
-1	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. in the west women have all the same rights and opportunities as men if not more. We've come a long, long way indeed, but there's still a lingering effect. And it'd almost be surprising if there wasn't, it's not long ago that women were pretty strictly expected to only work in the home.	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 06:52 PM
-14	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. Sure, one could say that the patriarchy hurts both men and women - and even if you don't like the words used, it's still a society that lets men work and earn money, and therefore power, and made women dependent.	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 06:29 PM
-20	Nailing it hard. Well, it’s not a lie. There is a wage gap. And there are reasons why women choose professions that don’t pay quite as well, or even a risk that they might be paid slightly worse than men, because their professions may not be valued as much. The hard core lack of women in the workforce is still affecting the average today. Luckily women and girls are killing it in education, and were rapidly removing unnecessary gender-barriers in our culture, so they’ll probably catch up quick.	/r/AntiFeminists	10/12/20 04:19 PM
-75	Amazon has a very strict policy on "offensive materials" and bans any literature that comments hatred based on gender. Yet they continue to sell the SCUM manifesto, a radical anti-male book that proclaims the necessity of killing all men. While a bit of a double standard, at least I, as a dude, am not even slightly afraid that those books are really ever going to affect me. Women are still feeling aftershocks of a society that strictly expected them to be house wives and baby makers, so there’s a lot more people who might read and act on material that promotes hatred against women.	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 01:36 PM
11	A man posts that he was cheated on, instead everyone feels sorry for the woman and thinks she was a victim of him. The post is so insane that unless I see a direct link to the conversation I don’t buy it’s real.	/r/MensRights	14/10/20 10:06 PM
0	The fact that a pregnant woman publicly and proudly announces that she'll abort her kid if it's a man makes my stomach turn inside out Shit like this is said so bloody often now, When you scour the entire internet, you can find basically anything. No one actually says shit like this. There's no great tsunami of people aborting specifically male children (unlike during the one-child policy in China, which lead to a gigantic majority of male babies). You're getting angry over fabricated controversy. This isn't an issue in society, at all.	/r/MensRights	07/10/20 02:21 PM
-6	The fact that a pregnant woman publicly and proudly announces that she'll abort her kid if it's a man makes my stomach turn inside out How hard is it to raise a child to be a decent human being? How hard is it to not believe everything you read online? Very hard, for you people it seems.	/r/MensRights	06/10/20 06:48 PM
19	Well deserved! B-b-but now I can’t hate a woman :( How is OP’s post even an attempt at a pussy pass? Insurance fraud has no gender, and we don’t know how desperate they are or why they did it. Some people actually need money, and it’s not a question of just desiring infinite luxury or whatever.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/09/20 10:14 AM
-39	The man has a point. No one actually wants to kill all men. You’re dealing with one crazy person, not “they”.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/08/20 10:25 PM
1	“If you can’t handle me at my worst, you don’t deserve me at my best” Unlike you, who regularly and open-mindedly seek opposing viewpoints (outside of your own echo-chambers where tweets and imgur-pics of texts with caricatures of insane SJW-types). For anyone actually interested in doing so, I invite you to check out Vaush on youtube. Great vids on feminism and trans and other issues, if you want to get a firmer grasp on wtf the issue is actually about and what the facts are. Just disregard his socialist bullshit that actually involves workers literally seizing t…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/08/20 01:48 AM
2	So true and why is it that way? Yup. It's sad but not overly surprising - obviously there'll be tension when feminists correctly point out that there are still roots of the patriarchy lingering (like women too often having to get their husband's permission to get their tubes tied, and a man usually doesn't need the wife's permission to get a vasectomy), while men's rights activists correctly point out that there are also some inequalities men face (Edit: like more suicides, earlier deaths, discrimination in family court (thoug…	/r/MensRights	31/07/20 04:35 PM
0	So true and why is it that way? You should see the doozies of women I see in real life. There are billions of people. You can become a human-hater if you let the shitty ones define the rest, man or woman or whatever other arbitrary distinction we want to make (sex isn't arbitrary, gender is).	/r/MensRights	31/07/20 04:14 PM
3	So true and why is it that way? This view of women/people is pretty cancerous. Don’t let a few shitty women paint your view of all women - especially not if the shitty women in question are just posts you have seen online.	/r/MensRights	30/07/20 08:47 PM
0	Another Brian Banks. There's no proof showing people are being rampantly falsely accused of rape. We can see that people accused of rape do not suffer the huge, drastic consequences people here believe. Sure, false accusations happen, as it does with literally any crime. I see no reason to believe it happens disproportionately with rape accusations against men. Can you provide that data? Lastly, try to ask close female friends if they've had experiences with sexual assault of any kind. I just talked to my friend, an…	/r/MensRights	19/07/20 09:31 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. I wish you wouldn't base your opinions of broad issues like rape on personal experienced or stories you've read about online. Divorce court is absolutely fucking vicious, and both men and women lie and cheat and steal and kill to make the ex look bad and get the kids. I wish I could take you through a relevant degree of some kind. You'd change your tune with a slowness, because study takes a long ass time.	/r/MensRights	19/07/20 09:13 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. I disagree, this shit is not exceedingly rare. Women lie in situations like this a non-trivial percent of the time. Simply put, if a woman "gets mad" at you, then they want to hurt you back. And they know they can hurt you and get their justice by making a rape allegation. There are no solid numbers for the number of false rape allegations. We can luckily see that the accused are not instantly exiled from society, as so many people claim and are scared of. It's simply not true - not for public p…	/r/MensRights	19/07/20 09:02 PM
0	Another Brian Banks. "numerous" means nothing. You could scrounge up 1000 cases of long haired people killing bald people with pencils or whatever. I won't be too critical of you. I myself was guilty of doing exactly what you're doing right now. The data and experts simply do not show that men generally have to worry about having their lives destroyed at the mere accusation of sexual misconduct or rape.	/r/MensRights	19/07/20 08:50 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. For every accusation I have seen, the effects from public justice has been life changing. Careful you're not basing your opinion on memes and individual cases that aren't representative. Again, we're billions of people. You could find individual stories to support any and all narratives. That's why we should rely on data and expert opinion when forming opinions about the world - as I failed to do, and probably in many ways still fail to do. I don't want to pretend to be perfect. Getting fired is…	/r/MensRights	19/07/20 03:41 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. Im not claiming 0 but its exponentially less Possibly, we have no way of knowing for sure. I think a whole lot of boys and girls don't really understand how to approach sex, partly due to abysmal sex ed, and thus end up in shitty situations where they might be pressured into doing stuff they don't really want to, and sometimes it crosses into undeniable rape. Also Im a firm believer in that people shouldnt make accusations unless they actually have proof. Not because I dont think they should wan…	/r/MensRights	18/07/20 10:24 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. Why would would you count it as a true rape allegation when it’s false? Because it’s not considered a false allegation, it’s considered a rape. Which means that false allegations might be more common than is thought. Which was my point. What the fuck are you talking about? No one wants false allegations counted as true allegations. No one wants innocent people in jail just because. No one is arguing you're not innocent until proven guilty. All people are arguing is that women should be taken ser…	/r/MensRights	18/07/20 10:08 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. Men are believed even less than women lmao. And they both get raped the same amount. I'm for taking all accusations of rape more seriously. I bet men's numbers are inflated due to prison rape, which would mean men are generally, at least in normal society, not at as great a risk. But it's not a competition. But you dont see anyone including men in metoo and you dont see men falsely accusing women of rape Are you claiming 0 men have ever falsely accused a woman of rape or some other crime? Perhap…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 09:26 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. He was found not guilty, weather she admits lying or not, she IS lying, that’s what the court has determined. That's not what a "not-guilty" sentence means. Don't speak so fervently on a topic you know nothing about. What right do you have to comment that this only happens rarely? What right do you have to comment that this doesn't happen rarely? We will never have rock solid data on this, and 1 false accusation is 1 far too many, but we don't see men getting thrown in jail over flimsy accusatio…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 05:10 PM
0	Another Brian Banks. I'm sure some men also accuse women of rape, but are dismissed - by men and women alike - for any number of reasons. These would be helped too by increasing seriousness with accusations of sexual assault. Besides, there's a massive amount of misinformation and misunderstandings of basic arguments that lead to totally unnecessary conflicts, often with feminists.	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 05:00 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. If women are not believed it’s probably because of the fact it’s so easy to ruin someone’s life with no proof for them. They aren't believed because people believe them too easily? What? With rape there is no innocent until proven guilty. Even if you don’t catch a charge and it’s false your reputation will be ruined regardless of the outcome. I myself thought this once. It's just not true. People are not getting falsely accused and have their lives ruined by clearly false accusations in giant sw…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 04:43 PM
0	Another Brian Banks. A close friend of mine is now labeled a sex offender for life because he and a girl hooked up at a party and she regretted it. They were both drunk Maybe your friend wasn't entirely honest with everything that happened that night. I don't know what happened. You don't either. If it was indeed a false accusation, it's awful. Unfortunately, that will inevitably happen. People get falsely accused of murder, but we still have to take accusations very seriously. If someone argued we didn't have to ta…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 04:33 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. I find it funny that you speak of this as if its a rare occurrence If it wasn't, there'd be more than a small handful of stories. You have to actively seek this out. It if it was such a widespread problem, it would come to you. If I were a woman just point out who's life you want me to ruin, and I could do it Often claimed, not actually true at all. I would bet you $200 that society as a whole favors women over men I'd take that bet, prove me right, and you'd wiggle out of it over your personal …	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 04:22 PM
1	Another Brian Banks. On the flip side, how many men are possibly in prison right now that are innocent of rape but the justice system failed them? 1 would be 1 too many, and I don't think it's a competition for oppression. You say false allegations are very rare but are you counting the ones where the guy was convicted even though he is innocent? I’m not sure that number will ever be known but it’s something to think about. Why would I count that as a true rape allegation when it's false?` I don't believe more innoc…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 04:11 PM
0	Another Brian Banks. So is rape Are you implying rapes and false rape accusations occur at roughly the same frequency? Far too often man are accused of rape when women regret a sexual encounter after the fact. I've seen zero proof of this happening. Not-guilty sentences are not proof. Far too often consensual sex after both parties have been drinking is called rape and despite both parties being drunk somehow the man is responsible. Don't base your opinions on this topic on memes you saw on 4chan or some weird subre…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 03:28 PM
-19	Another Brian Banks. You'd go to jail because the first amendment doesn't allow you to do that. Ah. Well, again, I don't think anyone is against punishing outright fabricated accusations. However, there is the issue that punishing the accuser in a simple not-guilty case would deter many, many real accusations from being made. No one wants to have their traumatic experience dragged through the judicial system with the added insult of risking jail if your scooped out vagina didn't yield sufficient cum from your rapist…	/r/MensRights	17/07/20 12:05 AM
-39	Another Brian Banks. What do you expect to happen if you did that, apart from scaring a bunch of people, making some noise, but ultimately with everyone ending up fine? Are you implying people would kill or otherwise harm the person you point to? And that a rape accusation is the same? It's very rare that rank false accusations ruin lives. Of course it happens - again, we're billions - but not often enough for anyone to worry about. You're not in any real danger of being falsely accused of rape. The point is simply …	/r/MensRights	16/07/20 10:19 PM
-24	Another Brian Banks. I dont fucking care. If you lie about being raped, you should be sentenced to how many years the “rapist” would have been sentenced for if they were found guilty. Imagine how evil you must be to lie about something as serious as rape. I already said false rape accusations are bad. Do you think I disagree with your statement or something? (Edit: maybe not on the exact punishment, but you come off as if I said something directly contrary.) Also, it doesn't matter if you care. Fact of the matter is…	/r/MensRights	16/07/20 10:06 PM
-170	Another Brian Banks. Luckily this stuff happens exceedingly rarely (you see a shitload of it posted on subs like this one, but on a planet with billions, unusual stuff happens every day). Also, on the topic, it's extremely important that we remember that the whole "believe women" isn't about instantly throwing anyone in jail. It's just a counter-reaction to the fact that far too often are women disbelieved when they come forward with a rape accusation. This individual situation shouldn't detract from that effort. Fo…	/r/MensRights	16/07/20 09:33 PM
48	woman gets shut down... on pornhub Yup, this entire thread is cancer.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/07/20 11:29 AM
1	This video breaks my heart. A pro gamer (who is on the spectrum) was falsely accused of sexually assaulting a girl. Turns out he can’t have an orgasm and is severely depressed because of a botched childhood circumcision. Enough is enough with false accusations and genital mutilation. 1 bad person doesn’t destroy an entire community.	/r/MensRights	05/07/20 07:28 AM
-1	How to destroy a feminist in 2 minutes I love how you people are so insanely arrogantly wrong that all you have left is to double down on your confidently incorrect stance. You'll either change your mind or you'll die an old, irrelevant fool that young people laugh at for being born in the stone age and having nothing whatsoever to contribute - just like you and I did with old, stupid fucks when we were kids.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/07/20 10:33 AM
0	How to destroy a feminist in 2 minutes 1 emotional leftist does not disprove leftism, hahahaha. Why are you people so absurdly, cartoonishly silly? Saying "lol you just repeat rhetoric xDDDD" doesn't disprove a movement in the slightest. Why can't rightwingers debate without resorting to strawmen? Are you just that weak in your convictions?	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/07/20 10:31 AM
-8	How to destroy a feminist in 2 minutes Well, his comments were stupid. Just because the concept and words for male privilege and patriarchy etc. (re)entered the culture a decade or so ago doesn’t mean it’s some fad with no merit. It’s not an argument in the slightest. Then he points out that men are also suffering in some ways. Feminism isn’t about men magically and cruelly having every single solitary and conceivable advantage while women have 0 rights. He “dismantled” a straw man ideology that he hasn’t understand with irrelevant, …	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/07/20 06:55 AM
1	Wtf You are. No feminist would ever, or could ever, defend this opinion under feminist theory. It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever, and fucking no one believes it. I have plenty of far left friends, and none would ever want a guy to just accept any rape accusation regardless of anything. You’re literally basing your world views on opposition to memes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/06/20 08:29 AM
35	There aren't enough wealthy financiers to satisfy the endless desires of every gold digger. Man up American men! YOU'RE HURTING THE MARRIAGE PROSPECTS OF AMERICAN WOMEN!!! Luckily he people who genuinely don’t want gender roles obviously don’t want gold diggers either, unless that’s the kink you and you partner want to go with. Abolish gender roles and the notion that men should be breadwinners. It’s all bullshit.	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	02/06/20 07:10 AM
-2	Gents, we got 'em It seems like there isn’t the huge groundswell or insane feminazis who just want to discriminate against and castrate men. The memes and talking points from subs like he’s would make you think otherwise. I wonder why?	/r/PussyPassDenied	22/05/20 09:23 AM
-1	It could be you or your son one day I don’t think this is specifically a men’s rights issue at all. Women who are raped face lots of problems when reporting a rape. Stigma, distrust, invasive tests for gathering evidence, inaction from police, and traumatic legal steps where you have to explain and relive the traumatic event. These issues may be part of why it came out so late and why it’s basically impossible to try the accused. What evidence can even really be presented for justice to be met (edit: 2 years after the supposed fac…	/r/MensRights	08/05/20 11:16 AM
0	Interesting how "Our Body, Our rights" doesn't apply here This is 1 random ass person who might even be kidding. Let’s not get carried away.	/r/MensRights	17/04/20 10:10 AM
1	Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single Dad Again, we are talking about child support, it is not a poor people thing. And again, the ultimate purposes of child support is to make sure that children do not lack necessary things just because they only have 1 parent. I bet you support drug testing for those on welfare though. And again, child support has nothing to do with poor people. Why do you assume I support drug testing those on welfare, when I'm arguing for a UBI and a state-sponsored child support? Does that sound like a strict appro…	/r/MensRights	12/04/20 10:30 PM
0	Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single Dad "This charge was flagged for being at a upscale steakhouse in lower Manhatten where no one under the age of 18 is allowed, can you explain that?" would be the result of monitoring the purchases. Sounds like a stupid amount of manhours poured into making sure poor people never, ever, ever, ever misspend even a single cent. More on that below. It could even be only monitored when one person reports a possible violation. Lul, should we give a "finders fee" so that we can make extra sure that societ…	/r/MensRights	07/04/20 12:10 PM
0	Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single Dad SNAP food benefit recipients are limited to purchasing certain types of food using state money and this is enforced with simple software and being forced to use a state-provided card with the funds on it, this is already available and would be simple to adapt to child support. A lot of random shit goes into raising a kid. Should your baby-bux be able to buy ice cream the kid on a sunny day? Some credits on their console-account? Random school supplies for some weird project? I trust single paren…	/r/MensRights	06/04/20 07:21 PM
6	Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single Dad Sounds like a nightmare to manage. I don’t think tax dollars are well spent micro managing every nickel and dime that poor people spend, just to make extra sure that not a dollar is misspent. I also think it’d be incredibly annoying for these people to have to keep track of all expenses, possibly keeping receipts and filing the correct documentation at the correct date, all while being a single parent. I’m opposed to the concept of child support anyway. The kid needs money regardless of how poor…	/r/MensRights	06/04/20 04:03 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied The lion also kills the cubs to force the females into heat. You don't think you have a higher chance of procreating and extending your genetic lineage if you just... don't care about something that doesn't matter at all compared to basically anything else? If you met a girl that was probably as smart, pretty, kind, loving, and genuinely in love with you, not just infatuated, would you choose to maybe lose the girl of your lifetime if she happened to have had a couple hundred sex partners from a…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/04/20 04:00 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied An individual's satisfaction in a long term relationship goes down for every sexual partner they have had. I'd imagine that would be an issue. Does this apply to all humans, or are you just looking at very broad statistics that might be influenced by the fact that promiscuity often follows from many, many social ills? I'm not sure what you mean by missing out though, unless you're talking about how people stop wanting you so much when you've had over 10 partners. It's the thing about "sowing you…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/04/20 03:56 PM
1	She thinks she’s not koo enough to work Verbal arrangements are just as binding as non-verbal. The trouble only comes when it’s time to prove it - but if you do agree there was a verbal agreement, you’re bound by that agreement. I doubt it’s different in the US. “Gentleman’s agreement” isn’t a lower level or has limits beyond very technical shit. I’m sure you have to sign something to count as the president of the US or whatever.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/04/20 07:07 AM
1	Someone was definitely denied The harm is the harm you do to yourself when you take the most intimate connection you can have with someone I think it's perfectly possible to view sex as a physical rather than emotional act. I didn't once, but I changed my mind. Sex is just pleasurable. No need to put in lots of emotions, beyond just liking someone enough to give in to desire. and degrade it enough so that it doesn't feel off when you're putting your thumb up the ass of someone who's name you can't even recall. Porn actors de…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/04/20 05:59 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied That's kinda of irrelevant to the point, unless you're proposing correlation is being mistakenly attributed causation, in which case I'll reconsider. I'm saying that I think the results are skewed by all the promiscuous people who have issues that make them more likely to be promiscuous and untrustworthy partners. A meth addict probably has a lot of sex partners, and is probably not trustworthy. Is it the sex or the meth abuse that makes them bad partners? Just one (extreme) example of course, b…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/04/20 03:05 PM
2	Someone was definitely denied https://ifstudies.org/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/institute-for-family-studies/ Bias: Right Factual Reporting: MIXED Meh, I'm not particularly impressed. But sure, I don't deny that sometimes promiscuity and personal issues go together, and troubled people try to find solace in sex. But that doesn't exclude all promiscuous partners. It doesn't mean you should abandon the perfect woman who loves and truly understands you or whatever, just because she might have slept around a lot.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 09:04 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied you're kidding yourself if you think a person who's had a hundred partners would be more likely to make a good long term partner than a person who's had five. Why? Maybe this person rests in themselves much more, and aren't worried about "losing out". Maybe they sowed their wild oats. Maybe they're a really, really good fuck. Maybe they're the perfect partner, "but" they've had a lot of sexual encounters. I really don't see the issue. I was raised to feel just like you, but after thinking about …	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 08:31 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied If they're used to being promiscuous, there will definitely be some doubts as to whether they'll revert on the part of the partner who is actually looking for a serious relationship This sounds like your personal insecurity - that you're afraid that you're not enough to please a woman who's had a lot of partners. Sure, a woman who knows what she wants is probably more demanding in bed. I don't see the issue with that. You'd probably benefit from her experience anyway. You can say you won't rever…	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 08:30 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied Either you don't respect yourself enough to take sex seriously, or you're so inept at relationships that out of 100, 0 people wanted you for more than you were giving out for free. Why does a person need to "take sex seriously"? What if they take it seriously, and really enjoy it, and have a lot of it with a lot of people? What's the harm?	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 08:26 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied In my case, a whore represents to me something similar to what represents a meth addict, i just can't trust people like this, and not only in the love aspect but in the daily life as well. I think unpredictable it's re word to refer these people. I think you're conflating nymphomaniacs, who are addicted to sex, and regular promiscuous women. It's one thing to have a lot of partners and sleep around every weekend, and quite another to NEED dick in you 24/7. If we're dealing with an addict, sure, …	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 08:24 PM
1	Someone was definitely denied Why would it be a misstep for the Discerning Gentleman to marry a woman who’s had many sexual partners, specifically? Does a woman “lose value” for every dick she’s had, just because women have an easier time gettin sex? I don’t get it, yet you state it so authoritatively.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 07:43 AM
-10	Someone was definitely denied What’s the problem, really, with promiscuity? Does her soul get dirty or some nonsense like that? Does a man’s? Yes, it’s easier for a woman to get sex. Why is it wrong if she likes sex and has a lot of it?	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/20 07:39 AM
-33	Woman rapes a 13 year old boy and has his baby, she falsely claimed she was raped: The child born is free from guilt but still has needs, even if a parent is a rapist. I find the major issue to be that the US has such a weak system that it has to rely on individuals like this, which has silly consequences like making rape victims pay child support.	/r/MensRights	04/03/20 08:05 PM
4	Japanese woman to white women Oh look, someone pretending that the insane tumblrinas are representative of every day feminists, even women in general. What a laff. Let’s run with this shtick forever and ever and ever, shall we?	/r/MensRights	19/02/20 04:55 PM
0	Pikachu face :o Luckily these women are few and far between. Also, I wouldn’t always pay for food with any of my friends. Don’t let yourself be taken advantage of by shitty people, man or woman.	/r/PussyPassDenied	17/02/20 12:45 AM
-5	Next time try supporting your own? What? Activism is many things, like raising attention to an issue. Greta Thunberg is making millions of people talk about climate change, and that alone makes it more likely for politicians and businesses to take action, because they know it’s a topic people care about. Also, I’m sure countless activism groups are very consistent in their practices and beliefs, like having a diverse staff (which doesn’t mean 0 straight/white/male employees). This attempt to dismiss all activism is weird anyway. …	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/02/20 08:57 PM
17	2/14 anal sex THE GUY IS THE RECEIVER HUEHUEHEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE Every single fucking time.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/02/20 10:39 AM
1	Stolen from r/trashy but I felt like this fits here He has a cleft lip? Didn't even know.	/r/PussyPassDenied	16/01/20 01:21 PM
4	Ultimate power move ...unless?	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/01/20 01:52 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I don't feel the need to give you a lot of sources for saying: "A slap in the face does not (legally) justify putting someone's head through a window. That response is not automatically "on them"". That's my claim. Are you seriously so fucking far up your own ideological asshole that you're going to disagree with me on that, you drooling fucking idiot? Do you think a lot of judges or juries will consider that "self defense" in most situations? I fully acknowledge that a person can act in a way t…	/r/MensRights	27/12/19 12:50 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Which jurisdiction does not recognize the rule of proportion I'm talking about here? Which jurisdiction allows people to meticulously break every bone in someone's body if they slap you after a heated argument? Fuck off bitch.	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 08:19 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Most people who call themselves feminists don't matter But that's what I'm saying: Feminists in general do not want to discriminate against men, regardless of what a few insane feminazis believe. The ones who matter, the ones with real power, are virulently anti-male. They must be opposed at every turn. What are they proposing that you believe will discriminate against men? I have yet to see a single solitary example. Everything that focuses on women is from fucking 50 years ago, which was unden…	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 08:03 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Feminists with influence pushed for the tender years doctrine. You keep talking about "feminists with influence". Do you acknowledge that these are not the exact same as "feminists in general"? So do you now agree with me that feminists in general are not the insane bitches this sub portrays them a I literally fucking said that isn't what matters. Maybe if you understood the question it'd be easier to answer. Then stop supporting feminists in politics and academia who push for policies that do j…	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 07:53 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” My initial statement even indicated the ERA is sex neutral. I never once indicated anything differently. Not did I indicated I wouldn't support a sex neutral law. Then what's the problem? What would the law achieve that hasn't already been achieved? Sounds like it wants to make sure women have the right to abortion, and certainly not to make men 2nd class citizens. Regarding the government yes, the only objective way to determine sexism is by legal rights. Everything else is just subjective. So …	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 07:27 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Since your computer doesn't seem to be working properly let me hold your hand. Oh it works fine, it's just when I'm not in your echochamber of hating on a select few insane feminazis, I can't really guess too much at what you say you believe, because I doubt even you really now. That's why I try to ask you for specifics. Why only female? What rights do men have today that women do not? You realise you're citing stuff from the '50s, right? Could it be that domestic violence against women was a gr…	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 02:25 AM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Call me when you have feminists with influence pushing to close the criminal punishment gap. Call me when you find some answers to my question. You said "What matters is what the majority of feminists with influence do." yet you're unable to find me examples of what a majority of feminists do that you disagree with. Lol. So do you now agree with me that feminists in general are not the insane bitches this sub portrays them as (specifically that they don't want men to be discriminated against or …	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 02:12 AM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Yup, stats seem to bear that out. I restate my point: In general, feminists are in no way trying to discriminate against men. How can to say those two sentences? Can you read and comprehend basic text? I said: So? Again, HISTORICALLY this has probably been correct. That's how I interpret the duluth model: Accurate enough to explain domestic violence some, what, 50 years ago? But not today. Do you honestly think feminists today want male victims of domestic violence to not be recognized or receiv…	/r/MensRights	25/12/19 02:01 AM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Domestic violence is mostly both partners beating each other. When it's only one direction, it's about split between men and women. Yup, stats seem to bear that out. There simply is no argument towards men being the only or most violent So? Again, historically this has probably been correct. Some patriarchal countries consider wife beating to be the norm. I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the same was the case some 50 years ago. That's what the model is about; not a modern view of the issue. I…	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 10:18 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Duluth model pushed by feminism for decades is exactly that. I did look at it: The Duluth Model proposes that the principal cause of domestic violence is a social and cultural, patriarchal ideology that has allowed men to control women through power and violence. My emphasis. Is this really incorrect? Times are changing, but historically speaking this seems accurate. The model is from 1981.	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 07:01 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” What matters is what the majority of feminists with influence do. What is it that they actually do that you disagree with? Not some tumblrina suggesting we kill all men or whatever. My claim is that feminism isn't actually spinning out of control. I was worried this would be the case a few years back, but it hasn't happened.	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 06:47 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I disagree. There is no actually talking to them because they filter out everything you say You have been in the echochamber for too long. Feminists, when you break through the bubble and get to talk to them, seem perfectly genuine in wanting gender equality. When you bring up topics where men are being discriminated against, they may say the focus should be on women, but they're not actively seeking discrimination. I don't believe gender equality should be achieved under the banner of feminism,…	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 06:23 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” You really need to ask? Yes, because feminists state "we live in a patriarchy!" with the same dismissive arrogance and just as few arguments. I meant that the radicals run feminism Which is why I said "feminists in general". What you mean is that you mostly see rad fems. You think they're dominating the feminist culture. I disagree. I think rightwingers love to focus on rad fems because they're easy targets, easy to meme on, easy to pick apart. I can call myself a capitalist all I want; I still …	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 06:05 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Don't forget to add the Hayden Rider attached to the ERA. It turns what would turn a sex neutral amendment into a women's only amendment. It establishes men as second class citizens Source? Who supports it? Is this an intended function of the amendment or an oversight? It's a sneaky and underhanded way to get abortion constitutional protects. This sounds like a rightwing misinterpretation of a constitutional amendment that would ensure women the right to abortion. If that's the goal, I don't thi…	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 05:53 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I'm not convinced you recognize what sexism is if you truly believe its more prevalent against women. And I think you have listened for too long to people who agree with you and agree to an extreme. You don't seem willing to consider the opposing viewpoint. It's fine, it takes a while. The reality is there are far more instances of discrimination and institutional second against men than exist against women That's not "reality". That's your interpretation of the world, fed by memes and cherry pi…	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 05:42 PM
-1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” And there's blatant sexism against men today. There's a bit here and there, I'd never deny that, but I think it's unreasonable to assume that the sum total of that is noticeably greater than the lingering sexism that women inevitably face. People who grew up when women "belonged in the kitchen" are still in power today. It'd be obtuse to assume these people have just magically adjusted to the times and have left any lingering kind of sexism behind. Just look at some members of the incelcommunity…	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 03:42 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I agree that feminists are far too insular. I've struggled for a long, long time to wiggle their arguments out of them. However, we should acknowledge that there is still lingering sexism against women, even today. A forum with their ideology is inevitably going to attract ALL the actual sexist idiots everywhere, who just want to "troll" by telling them to "just make a sandwich ex dee". If I was a mod there, I'd probably quickly develop a low tolerance for whatever I considered remotely bullshit…	/r/MensRights	22/12/19 03:20 PM
0	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” Look at the duluth model, I did: The Duluth Model proposes that the principal cause of domestic violence is a social and cultural, patriarchal ideology that has allowed men to control women through power and violence. My emphasis. Is this really incorrect? Times are changing, but historically speaking this seems accurate. The model is from 1981. VAWA, I'll just quote: Q: Does the Violence Against Women Act currently serve men? A: Yes. VAWA funds continue to be available for services provided to …	/r/MensRights	22/12/19 03:10 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” It keeps you content, and it ensures that radical feminists will always prevail. How is feminism "prevailing"? if they trust the vocal minority to speak for them, the minority opinion becomes the majority opinion. Indeed - do you think most feminists would agree with the insane feminazis you're referring to? If asked, would they be okay with this vocal minority representing them? I doubt it. Vocal minorities are not democratically elected.	/r/MensRights	22/12/19 02:53 PM
2	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I'm quite sure criminal laws in western nations have a concept of "proportional force" when it comes to self defense, in that no country has zero limits on how much force you can use to defend yourself. I'll go out on a limb and say that all those countries require you to be meet the threat of violence with equal or somewhat greater force, up to and including (edit: if you're met with) lethal force.	/r/MensRights	22/12/19 12:50 PM
1	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” if "a reasonable person" has reason to fear for their life, lethal force can be considered self-defense. And a slap in the face is probably not going to fly as a "fear for your life", with obvious exceptions. Thank you for restating my point, dumbass.	/r/MensRights	22/12/19 12:32 PM
-29	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” I sincerely doubt a majority of feminists want there to be no punishment for female domestic abusers. A few tumblrinas or twitter morons don’t really count. There are people who believe all sorts of insane nonsense, and it’s easy to cherry pick them all and create the illusion that eeeeeveryone believes said nonsense. Edit: Not a single person gave me a single example proving that feminists in general are actively trying to discriminate against men. Every example seems to be very clearly misinte…	/r/MensRights	21/12/19 11:44 PM
-10	“Me hitting you is okay but you can’t hit me.” You slap him, then he puts your face through a window, it's on you. This is not at all correct. If someone attacks you, you can defend yourself with equal or somewhat greater force (Edit: for the idiots, that means that if you're met by lethal force, or close to it, you can defend yourself with lethal force. I hope I spelled it out for you). A slap in the face does not warrant beating the attacker on the ground with several punches and kicks, for instance. Stop spreading bullshit. Edit: You are …	/r/MensRights	21/12/19 11:42 PM
0	Judge Tracie Hunter complying with guilty criminals. I didn't even say anything about skin color, you did. You said it'd be "boring" if we were all the same race, no? A mixed culture will turn out to be monolithic and stagnant and based on nothing but whatever current entertainment trends are on the roste Source on that claim, or is it your personal opinion? I see absolutely zero reason why there'd be only one culture if we were all mixed together and no one looked differently from others. Look at the USA. Majority white people, vastly different c…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/19 01:42 PM
-1	Judge Tracie Hunter complying with guilty criminals. The right wants to push the race-narrative because they think some are worse than others (inb4 some racist going "nonono, not worse or better, just different lol xDDD". Fuck off, I'm not buying it), and the left pushes the race-narrative because they want to help segments of the population that have been hurt collectively. Neither view focuses on people as individuals, which comes with problems. So no, unfortunately I see race-ism alive and well on both sides. The rightwing version is obviously …	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/19 12:46 PM
0	Judge Tracie Hunter complying with guilty criminals. I love multiculturalism It's fine, if the cultures make sense and are civilised. Edit: I should clarify slightly - if part of your culture says we should stone adulterers, hate gate people, judge individual people on the basis of their overall genetic background, not value free speech and other quintessential human rights, etc. etc. (and I will admit this is vague, but I believe an overall acceptance of human unity will carry us through all the philosophical problems this will result in) then yo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/19 12:42 PM
1	Judge Tracie Hunter complying with guilty criminals. That would be boring. No thanks. Is this what they mean by diversity? How would it be boring? Culture is the spice of life, not skin colour. I don't give a fuck about racial diversity. If there's racial diversity in your country, great. If there isn't, okay. Race should not be a factor in pretty much any decision whatsoever, maybe apart from in the doctor's room. That being said, I'd refer a world with one mixed race of everyone. Harder to be an uninformed racist nitwit if there's only one singl…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/19 12:36 PM
-17	Judge Tracie Hunter complying with guilty criminals. Displacement is a meme too often pushed by racists. Also, who cares what skin-colour people have in the future? I hope we’re all one race so that racism can fucking die.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/07/19 07:50 AM
2	The Hard truth about Divorce Depends on the woman, the prenup, and the relationship. Yes, there are risks. Yes, there may be statistically greater risks for men. No, that doesn't mean you should never get married - it means you should be smart and look for the best woman/partner possible, which everyone should do anyway. People are shit. Not every individual is shit. Do your best to find the best possible individual you can to face life with for as long as you are comfortable. Don't write off women/partners altogether.	/r/MensRights	02/05/19 06:20 PM
2	The Hard truth about Divorce I don’t think anyone should totally swear off marriage. I’m not sure I’ll ever get there, but I think there’s s lot to be gained by expressing to the world that this is your partner in life, even if you can also just live that without sending any messages. TLDR don’t get discouraged just because some people are awful and exploitative.	/r/MensRights	02/05/19 10:51 AM
-6	Woman arrested for assaulting man wearing MAGA hat on Cape Cod What’s going on? You whined about being the target of more hated than a klansman in a black neighborhood everywhere when wearing a MAGA hat. That’s obviously hyperbolic, overly sensitive bullshit, so why are you acting like the person pointing that out is the sensitive one? I assume it’s just because you think people won’t notice your sensitivity if you point it out in others, but come on, this is too obvious. Not that I defend this woman, you’re just being kind of a bitch.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/02/19 10:18 AM
2	I wanted a sexist diagram like the feminists have... Well, she may not have the right, but she basically has the power. If women decided it’s masculine/sexy to pogo stick everywhere, that’s what people would do and define masculinity as. Besides, men don’t have “the right” to define femininity, but that doesn’t mean they have nothing to offer on the topic.	/r/MensRights	29/01/19 09:58 AM
1	The modern Feminist female sucks at being a good girlfriend, wife and mom. That might be correct, but even if we assume this is the case, the tendency is not very strong. It doesn't apply to enough women that it's impossible to get a good one. Sure, most women suck, but so do men. People just suck, and we have to try really hard to get someone who's only a little shitty.	/r/MGTOW	24/07/18 03:40 PM
0	The modern Feminist female sucks at being a good girlfriend, wife and mom. There are more than plenty good women out there for you, if you just try a little. Many women might be insufferable cunts, but they do not represent womankind anymore than the awkward neckbeards who hate all women represent the men.	/r/MGTOW	20/07/18 11:41 PM
-2	A quick story about my uncle and why being successful doesn’t mean anything if you don’t hold frame You sound like you don't really respect your woman, assuming she hasn't expressed that it's okay to outright flirt with other people. Not really a healthy relationship. If my girl did that with other dudes, I'd get uppity.	/r/TheRedPill	07/07/18 06:39 PM
1	Daily MGTOW Reminder: Use protection But I don't make claims like "you can't even trust a human not to rob and kill you" because you actually can trust most humans to not do that shit.	/r/MGTOW	17/06/18 10:12 PM
-18	Daily MGTOW Reminder: Use protection This is paranoid bullshit. The amount of women who maliciously does this is tiny. You can most likely trust a woman not to do this, and a woman can most likely trust you not to rape her. We shouldn’t be scared of each other just because they might be dicks.	/r/MGTOW	09/06/18 09:41 AM
14	Rise of women backing out of divorce as settlements shrink. You get married for love, and get an ironclad prenup just in case. Nothing wrong with marriage. It’s not all doom and gloom.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/05/18 03:35 PM
-5	Double Standards “Can’t get enough of it” Fucking please.	/r/MensRights	27/03/18 09:51 AM
1	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." Don’t defend idiotic questions with condescension if you want nice goodbyes, bitch.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 11:41 PM
1	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." Stop reinforcing all the memes that ridicule MRAs with utterly ridiculous questions. It’s no different from insane feminazi morons who believe you’re a rapist for thinking naughty thoughts about a woman without asking her first. Screw your positive note.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 11:09 PM
0	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." Your condescension does not hide the fact that the question was completely moronic to anyone with half a brain. Men, human beings, have far more rights in the eyes of society than dogs. The fact that we greet and hug all dogs, and not all men, does not change this. Grow the fuck up.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 11:00 PM
0	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." So the masses dictate who’s an idiot and who isn’t? Try harder. Dogs barely have rights. Men, being human beings, do. No one will get particularly uppity if someone kills a healthy dog for no real reason, while it’s - painfully obviously - a legal matter if you kill a man. Is this some kind of joke? If so, good on you, but if you seriously think the point is valid you need to open your fucking eyes.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 10:54 PM
0	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." Maybe your question was just stupid, and you’re too far up your own ass to realism it.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 10:45 PM
-2	From Chris Rock's new show: "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." What an absurdly retarded question. Dogs can be owned and killed by the owner. They’re basically saves with incredibly limited rights. I’m all for men’s rights, but your question is idiotic and reinforces the stereotype of the dumb mra-moron. You’re shooting yourself, and your cause, in the proverbial foot.	/r/MensRights	17/02/18 10:36 PM