TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CountDodo Archive

View 0 posts and 176 comments by CountDodo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I support you killing yourself. please do.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:36 AM
1

If I were to see a similar post on r/feminism everyone over here would go batshit crazy about how feminists are turning the news of a dead mentally ill father and 2 dead boys into feminist propaganda just because of a Facebook comment. The only problem here is delusional pieces of shit like you who already ran the movement into the ground.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:36 AM
1

There's nothing to argue back, he told me to fuck off so I tell him to kill himself. You should kill yourself too, one less moron on this world.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:35 AM
1

She's someone who had a mental illness and didn't get the proper support. Stop being a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:34 AM
-1

If I were to see a similar post on r/feminism everyone over here would go batshit crazy about how feminists are turning the news of a dead mentally ill father and 2 dead boys into feminist propaganda just because of a Facebook comment.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:33 AM
1

No? And even if it was, who gives a shit, its a random post on Facebook. You are no better than the occasional idiotic feminist who writes on a sign "I need feminism because I didn't like a Facebook comment." That's how fucking idiotic this movement has become thanks to pieces of shit like you, how the focus is no longer men's rights but Facebook comments of no name idiots.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:26 AM
1

Are you going to cry again?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:16 AM
1

Its not ironic at all. What kind of moron are you that you can't even understand what irony is...
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:14 AM
1

Oh please, you're just one more piece of shit who's so pathetic you can't even handle a random Facebook comment without getting all butthurt and crying online. No matter how delusional feminists get its morons like you that always remind me MRAs are just as bad.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:13 AM
1

No you're definitely not an MRA, you're just a disgusting piece of shit and a waste of space and oxygen. Please, I beg of you, just kill yourself.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:45 PM
1

Oh, I'm fully aware I'll get downvotes every time. The only way this will ever change is if the mods take the movement seriously and start deleting these kinds of submissions, but I really don't see that happening. Just give it another year and we'll match /r/Feminism levels of delusion.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:28 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:24 PM
1

Even in cases of suicide you still have to determine the motive. It wasn't that long ago that a woman was convicted for convincing a guy into killing himself. The cause for a suicide is pretty important for the investigation.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:23 PM
1

I don't understand your reasoning either. How exactly does this have anything to do with men's rights? I mean, are you really trying to turn little girls being killed by a mother with a mental illness into a men's rights issue just because of a random facebook comment? Because if this really is the kind of 'problem' you think the men's rights movements exists to solve then let's just kill the movement now before it turns into people making signs saying 'I need men's rights because someone posted…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:18 PM
1

I can't remember any other news about a mother killing her own kids and committing suicide. So no, I definitely don't see these sort of comments regularly.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:56 PM
1

You do understand no one ever claimed or even remotely suggested women couldn't commit murder, right?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:40 PM
1

What I don't understand is why anyone wouldn't want the husband investigated. I'm pretty sure investigating the spouse of a murder victim is just common procedure, and if he didn't do it then he'd just be cleared of suspicion.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:23 PM
1

So if a woman and her two daughters are found dead you wouldn't want the husband to be investigated? I hope they investigate everyone very thoroughly.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:20 PM
5

It always depends on how good your lawyer is and what kind of judge you get. The simple truth is that the law doesn't matter that much.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:55 PM
1

I have no idea how what you said is in any way relevant
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:26 PM
1

The difference between you and me is that out of those 10 minutes I spend 5 reading the actual facts to make a sound argument while you spend 5 full minutes spewing bullshit out of your mouth. I know you like the taste of bullshit, but I really dislike the smell.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:09 PM
1

There's a difference between taking 15 seconds to write a reply insulting your intelligence and taking 10 minutes to write a proper argument. I am not going to waste 10 minutes of my life on an idiot who spends more time writing bullshit than it would take for you to read the article, but I'll sure as hell waste 15 seconds to call you a retard.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:43 AM
1

Like I said, quality incel material right here.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:37 AM
1

I gave you half a dozen opportunities to read the article before you try to argue, you wasted all of them. Unlike you I'm not a moron, I can tell when someone isn't worth my time.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:36 AM
1

You do understand I'm not even reading past your first sentence, right?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:46 PM
1

Victory? Wtf are you talking about? You didn't read the article and everything you said is plain nonsense, what possible victory could I claim when talking with a moron?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:21 PM
1

You're misunderstanding something here. I don't take personal offence, I just think you're a complete moron. Don't want people to think you're a moron? Well, that's easy, just stop acting like one. If you want to have a discussion without looking like a retard then read the damn article, its not that fucking hard.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:32 PM
1

Holy shit, this is some class A incel material.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:09 PM
1

Yes, context matters. There's a difference between staying a virgin because you're a loser and staying a virgin until you've lost the chance of having a family because you've been locked inside a house against your own will. If you think those two are the same then I have nothing more to say to you.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 10:49 AM
1

Is it illegal to listen to loud music? Also, out of curiosity, why exactly are you talking about marriage? You do understand they weren't actually married, right? Are you honestly so retarded to the point of arguing about an article you didn't read? Do you have brain damage or are you just a complete moron?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 10:46 AM
1

Are you being beaten, abused and locked in a house against your will?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 01:30 AM
1

Nonetheless my points don't change simply because they are pretty much obvious. They change because your points have nothing to do with the situation, you're basing your entire argument on clickbait that takes the court's decision out of context. What you're doing is like saying no man should go to jail for purposely blasting loud music when someone is on their phone, while ignoring that the fact that person on their phone had been stabbed and needs to speak clearly with the 911 operator before …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:44 PM
1

Again, did you read the full article or did you just read the snippet linked in the OP that mysteriously cuts off mid-sentence?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:34 PM
0

First read the full article and only then speak your opinion, because you're sounding like a complete moron who's going off on a rant after reading a clickbait title. Did you read the full article or did you just read the snippet linked in the OP that mysteriously cuts off mid-sentence?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:30 PM
1

Every time you trust the title without checking the article yourself you run the quite common risk of falling for clickbait titles which misrepresent the situation, which only further encourages the usage of clickbait titles by the significant portion of reddit who care more about karma than accuracy. The reason why you're wrong is because you're taking it out of context. No one is being charged with refusing to have sex, that is not the case here. What happened here is that a man abused his wif…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:28 PM
1

First read the full article and only then speak your opinion, because you're sounding like a complete moron who's going off on a rant after reading a clickbait title.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:55 PM
1

You purposely posted a link you knew hid most of the article including the context for the decision because you're a sad piece of shit. There's really no other excuse.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:32 PM
1

You are defending his right to lock up his wife and force her to lose abandon her reproductive rights against her will. The article clearly states that part of the emotional abuse she endured was being forced to remain a virgin until her forties despite him knowing full well her wish to have children, and he would frequently verbally abuse her using that fact. You keep crying as much as you want, but I'm not going to let you take the court ruling out of context just because you lack reading comp…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:57 PM
1

You're defending that a man should have to right to lock his wife and refuse her wish to have a family and use that denial of her reproductive rights as a means to further emotionally and psychologically abuse her. As such you are either a disgusting human being or an idiot who cannot comprehend even the simplest of sentences.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:38 PM
–

If you read the article then you have serious problems with simple reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:16 PM
–

I'm not the one here reaching wholly incorrect conclusions from clearly stated condemnations. You are actually, you keep defending a bullshit idea you pulled out of your ass without being smart enough to read the actual article.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:47 PM
–

Are you mentally retarded? You think that locking and abusing someone for 11 years and using her wish for a family as a means to further torment her is acceptable? Holy crap.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:15 PM
1

It was a purposely clickbait title and summary, taking the lack of sex out of context. The guy was a psychopath and used refusal to have sex just one more way to torment her, forcing her to stay a virgin until she was too old to have the family she wanted. The OP also knew the translation was cut off before context is given, but outrage and karma are always more important than accuracy.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:22 PM
1

First of all, he wasn't punished. Secondly, if you think locking someone inside without being allowed contact with friends and family and forcing them to stay virgins until they're no longer fertile and lost their chance of having the family they wanted is the same as a guy not wanting to have sex then I very much fear for any future partner of yours.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:15 PM
1

He's perfectly allowed to do that, he's just not allowed to deprive other people of the same right. He knew full well she wanted children and locked her inside the house and forbade contact with friends and family, while ensuring she remained a virgin until her forties and denying her the family she wanted. If you can't see the different between what he did and a husband not feeling like having sex then there's nothing else I can say.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:12 PM
1

In the context of the original article, yes it is. The forced virginity and denial of a family was a means to further the emotional abuse.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:09 PM
1

My guess is that he got leniency for being a judge. And the article is clickbaity, so the focus is on the fact that they counted him forcing her to stay a virgin until her forties and be denied her wish of a family as emotional abuse. That was not a simple right to abstain from sex, it was a premeditated means of furthering the abuse.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:07 PM
1

No one is denying you posted the clickbait parts of the article, but you did it knowing full well the majority of the article and the context for the decision would not show up in the translation.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:04 PM
2

Yes, he used the lack of sex as a way to further torment her as an addition to verbal abuse that she wasn't good enough, that all the other women were prettier, that she was nothing in life not even a woman. For all that and much much much more, he got a suspended sentence. The fact that somehow you think the court was injust to the man and not the victim speaks volumes. Comments that berate someone and blame their undesirability for the lack of sex are abuse, but the mere lack of sexual gratifi…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:59 PM
2

It kinda is, the OP just knowingly posted a translation that cut off before the article described the physical and verbal abuse she endured. She was beaten several times to the point where she needed medical assistance, and was kept locked at home where she couldn't leave and forced to remain a virgin till her forties despite wanting children. The refusal to have sex and forcing her to waste her fertile years is just one more thing in a long list of physical, emotional and psychological abuse.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:48 PM
2

OP already admitted he knew full well it was cutting off after the clickbait paragraph, right before it got into the actual spousal abuse. No, it won't. In this scenario the man abused her and locked her inside the house, forcing her to stay a virgin into her forties as she lost her fertility despite knowing she wanted to have children. It without a doubt constitutes as a form of abuse, and is not about just not wanting to have sex like you make it seem. If a woman forced you to stay a virgin un…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:42 PM
3

The problem is the OP purposely posting clickbait mistranslated articles and everyone else just eating it up without checking. The article even cuts off mid sentence, the fact that no one's suspicious about that is because they think clickbait titles are enough.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:29 PM
3

You linked a mistralation knowing fully well it was hiding most of the article. You were intentionally misleading the readers, and even when asked if it was accurately translated you happily said yes despite knowing it wasn't. It's very clear you just hate women and want people to jump on the same band-wagon, hopefully you get banned so no one has to read your piece of shit misleading articles again.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:27 PM
0

You were defending that cirumcision should be illegal, not that child circumcision should be illegal. There's a very obvious distinction between those two.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:24 PM
2

It was not a mis-translation, and i included those portions because they were the title, and the core subject of the article. Any translation that somehow erases 90% of the text is by all definitions a mistranslation, and you purposely included a link that cut off large portion of the article detailing physical and verbal abusing in order to mislead the readers.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:51 PM
-2

There's a difference between child circumcision and circumcision in general. Just because you don't like it you have no right to stop an adult from doing medically valid or cosmetic surgery. An adult man getting circumcised is no worse than an adult woman getting a boob job.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:39 PM
2

The article in no place states that. It literally states it stopped her from leaving the house. Ficou igualmente provado que Miguel de Vasconcelos trocou a fechadura da casa do casal em Mirandela, impedindo Vera Vidal de se ausentar quando bem entendesse. She could have ended the relationship at any time and found someone who did want to be a father. And men who get emotionally abused until they commit suicide could have also ended the relationship, but that's not how spousal abuse works. Let me…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:35 PM
5

Unfortunately spreading mistranslated articles with clickbait titles like these only hurts the MRA case, but people still like to misuse the MRA movement for their own purposes.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:30 PM
2

The original article states the man locked his wife inside the house so she could not leave, kept her from her friends and family, verbally assaulted her to the point of tears in public, physically abused her until she required medical assistance, and refused her sex and forced her to stay a virgin until the age of 42 despite knowing full well she wanted a family. For all of this, he got a suspended sentence. Men do have a say in when or if they wish to have sex, as long as you're not keeping a …
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:28 PM
2

No, but if your wife locks you inside the house and beats the shit out of you for 11 years like what happened here, do take her to court.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:24 PM
4

The only entertainment you'd get is being called a piece of shit and further claims that all MRAs are just woman hating extremists. And all of it would be true, because the original article states the man locked his wife inside the house so she could not leave, kept her from her friends and family, verbally assaulted her to the point of tears in public, physically abused her until she required medical assistance, and refused her sex and forced her to stay a virgin until the age of 42 despite kno…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:23 PM
1

No, the OP just decided to link a translation that cuts off before the real accusations about physical and psychological abuse begin. Particularly the ones about him locking her inside the house and using her as a punching bag.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:16 PM
2

She was kept against her will and caused emotional trauma by purposely refusing her the right of being a mother. You also very cleverly posted the clickbait article despite knowing full well 90% of the article pertaining to the physical and verbal abuse wasn't showing up on the translation. Why did you do it?
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:12 PM
3

Yes and no. It is correctly translated, but the translation cuts off way early due to a "show more" button. After the initial translated paragraphs that talk about the sex, the article goes into more details on how he would lock his wife inside the house and use her as a punching bag for over eleven years, with more than once requiring medical assistance. For all this and more, he just got a suspended sentence. You can easily tell that the original article is over 10 times longer than the transl…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:09 PM
2

That's not why she pressed charges, she pressed charges after being verbally, emotionally and physically abused for 11 years, going so far as being locked inside the house with no way out and kept as cheap alternative to a maid that the guy could also use as a punching bag.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:06 PM
1

What do you have to say about the rest of the article? Did you purposely paste click bait or just think it's okay for a man to beat the shit out of his wife for 11 years and get away with a suspended sentence? Os maus-tratos físicos a que Vera Vidal foi sujeita são descritos ao pormenor no acórdão. Bofetadas, socos, empurrões contra a parede e contra o chão. Em alguns casos, Vera Vidal teve de ser vista por médicos. Em 2008, que é o ano identificado pela própria queixosa e pelas testemunhas de a…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:04 PM
4

He locked her inside the house, abused her physically and emotionally over the course of 11 years, kept her as a cheap maid and punching bag, and also refused to give her a family as she remained a virgin until her forties. So no, women don't have the right to sex whenever they want, they just have the right to not be tortured for over a decade. I also believed they had the right to justice, but the guy just got a suspended sentence so I guess not.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:00 PM
3

What quote do you want? The one about the physical violence? Os maus-tratos físicos a que Vera Vidal foi sujeita são descritos ao pormenor no acórdão. Bofetadas, socos, empurrões contra a parede e contra o chão. Em alguns casos, Vera Vidal teve de ser vista por médicos. Em 2008, que é o ano identificado pela própria queixosa e pelas testemunhas de acusação como o ano em que a relação entre os dois entrou na fase mais violenta, Miguel de Vasconcelos terá mesmo arrastado Vera Vidal pelos cabelos à…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:46 PM
22

That's so unfair! How can the court take into account the man refusing her sex and shattering her dreams of having a family! Poor guy, he got a suspended sentence and all he did was beat the shit out of his wife for eleven years. He married his wife, who was a virgin and wanted to have kids and a family, and yet she remained a virgin till the age of 42. He forbade her any contact with her family and friends, cutting her ties with other human beings. The man verbally and emotionally abused his wi…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:35 PM
0

Yup, right out of my ass. Yes, right out of your ass.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:28 PM
1

You understand the thing that gets you confidence is your skill level, yes? Actually, no. That couldn't be further than the truth, and in fact the article you linked as a source disproves you. “When women are leaving, it is because they don’t think they can do it” – not because they can’t do it – she says. It is quite often that someone who is very skilled has low confidence, and someone who is an idiot is extremely confident in their abilities. Your implication of causation is simply flawed. Th…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:56 PM
2

The article illustrates the problems and solutions quite well though. If its because women are not less skilled at math but are less confident then programs which get girls interested in science, and therefore boost confidence in scientific fields, would be twice as beneficial.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:24 PM
1

That's true, but the outcome of those programs will only be visible when the girls enter college or the work force.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:56 PM
6

The thing is, if they actually focused on programs to get little girls and boys equally interested in science then the number of women in stem fields would grow naturally and there would be no need for quotas or any of that shit that artificially enforce diversity. But no, why the hell would you want to get women interested in science...
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:31 PM
8

In france?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:11 PM
21

If you claim it's not yours then you go to court and the judge issues a court order for a paternity test.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:44 PM
1

Don't stop now.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:12 AM
1

I already know you're a retard, you don't need to keep convincing me.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:56 PM
1

The fact that you think this is irony is only further proof of your idiocy.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:34 PM
1

You're not going back on point, you're just spewing the same bullshit over and over. When you want to stop being an obtuse idiot let me know. Honestly, I've taken shits that are more reasonable than you. You're the most illogical and retarded person I know to exist and quite honestly it really saddens me that morons like you are what passes for an MRA these days.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:48 PM
2

The core of feminism has logical issues. Dude, honestly, answer this question. Are you a retard? Are you? NO ONE GIVES A SHIT ABOUT FEMINISM, THAT IS NOT WHAT I AM TALKIGN ABOUT. FFS dude, it's not even that hard to take 5 minutes to read someone else's post.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:32 PM
0

Oh wow, I sense quite a bit of projection coming from you. I guess bitter angry retards don't make attractive boyfriends. Maybe you should seek some counseling instead of crying about it online.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:01 PM
2

Ultimately the issue is that the silent majority on both groups doesn't speak out. Although it's easy to understand why, since anyone who does becomes a target, its still extremely important to speak out against those preaching hatred.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:26 PM
2

You should ask that yourself. All you've done is ignore every single argument I've made to pull more bullshit about feminism out of your ass. Want an actual argument? Then start by reading what I said on my previous posts and make an actual reply. Throughout all your mindless regurgitation you have not touched a single point I made. If you want to ignore my arguments and argue against yourself instead by all means go ahead, but I'll be here calling you a retard. Honestly, I have no doubt that yo…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:56 PM
2

Feminists are the ones saying the famous phrase: "Women make 77cents to the man's dollar.". No shit retard. That's exactly what I said. Holy crap, you must have shit for brains. Honestly, I'm not even joking. If you're IQ is any higher than 70 I'd be surprised. But what's really funny how you proved my exact point. You're so full of hatred for others that you're not capable of understanding the simplest argument possible. And then you come cry saying that you're reasonable.. lol. All you do is s…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:43 AM
0

I am not equipped to argue with this level of retardation. FTFY
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:26 PM
0

Drink bleach. Such a witty reply! It really shows how you can still function even while being a retard. I'm sure mommy is really proud of her little tard!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:45 PM
0

Are you a complete moron? Honestly, are you? Holy crap. It's like you eat shit for breakfast but you like it so much you just vomit it and eat it again.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:13 PM
0

I would love to see you figure out a way to have men complaining about a wage gap, a rape culture, censoring women's talks by pulling fire alarms etc. The fact that you mentioned all of these only proves you're a complete moron. Good job there, because you're wrong on all of it. MRAs complain about wage gap all the time, you never shut up about it. You also keep complaining about a rape culture and blaming feminism for it. And MRAs do try to censor women's talks by insulting and harassing them. …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:12 PM
1

You call yourself reasonable, but you're anything but. Every single one of your posts is based on a strawman fallacy. Honestly, it's quite laughable. You don't want to see reason, you don't even want to argue against what I said, you just want to jerk off with everyone else about how feminism is evil. Once again, you're the exact reason why people label MRA as an hate group. Nothing you have said even remotely relates to any of my posts, but hey, I'll bite. Are MRAs promoting the wage gap myth? …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:09 PM
0

You're what's called a complete moron. Sadly there's nothing else to add.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:49 PM
2

First you would need to prove yourself right. I already did. you were then given direct contradicting evidence to the claim No. I was given evidence that contradicts a claim I did not make. Whose claim it was I do not know, but it certainly wasn't mine. I have to admit, I almost wonder if you are purposefully doing a parody of the type of feminists the person was talking about in the first place. Personally what I wonder is if you are completely brain dead or if there is still some life inside t…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:15 AM
2

I never did.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:13 AM
2

Alright let's keep going. Why? I already know what you think, I know you will never change your mind no matter how many times reality slaps you the face. Honestly, half of the things you just said can be perfectly applied to the MRA movement if you just switch feminists with MRAs and women with men. I know you won't change your mind, you know you won't change your mind, so why would you want to keep going?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:10 AM
-3

I understand the other side fine. They're man-hating idiots.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:19 PM
0

I replied to the first paragraph because everything else is pointless. Honestly, you ramble on and on and on as if somehow I had never heard that argument before. Your issue is that you think your argument is an excuse to harass and demonize feminists, and nothing you have said proves me wrong. All your feminist-hate speech will get you is turn more feminists against MRAs when we should be supporting each other. You can whine all you want like a little bitch but that's still all you're doing. Yo…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:12 PM
-3

Just look at this sub or any other forum where MRA's speak.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:09 PM
-3

I keep reading this and have yet to see this around here. People here do not like feminists and for good reason. They spew lies and hate. So you spew hate because they spew hate and ensure they will say the exact same thing about you. Where does that leave us?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:26 AM
-2

What you have to understand is that the vocal minority of the MRA's are women-haters, so even moderate feminists after nothing but unpleasant interactions will just view it as a hate group. Of course, this creates more extreme-feminists, which then creates more extreme-MRAs, polarizing both ideologies over time as the vocal minorities in both groups get worse and worse. Judging from your other post in this thread you are exactly the kind of person that demonizes feminists and therefore only cont…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:56 AM
4

If that's all you see other people as then you're no better than they are. You're the exact kind of person that makes women turn into man-hating bigots.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:49 AM
5

'Whining' has been a common response to the movie, and now it receives 'Wine' as the award prize.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:36 PM
11

I imagine that without marriage the chances of you getting custody of the child are even fewer.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:48 PM
9

All that proves is you've been angrily shouting the same nonsense for years, it doesn't prove anything you've said is true.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:40 PM
1

Not at all. In the video they all said they wanted a man who's taller than them.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 12:22 PM
0

You're trying to be clever, but all you're being is a creepy neckbeard.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 03:27 AM
-2

Preference for weight isn't creepy, asking about waist sizes is. I may like skinny girls but would I ever ask someone their waist size? Fuck no.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 03:26 AM
0

The problem is definitely people, in this case the problem is you.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 03:09 AM
-6

They didn't ask about anyone height's though. They said they prefer taller men, and then got uncomfortable when asked about their waist size. I would get uncomfortable too, I'm fine with saying I like shorter women, but what kind of creep asks people about their waist size? What's next, he's going to ask about the size of their feet?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 03:07 AM
1

Do you always cry after saying you don't care or is this a one time thing?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:41 AM
1

You're still crying.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:38 AM
0

No, that's not the problem. The problem is the video claiming that having preferences for your partner such as height, weight, etc. somehow means you must be comfortable with answering personal questions about waist size, weight, etc. If you ask me if I like tall or skinny women I won't mind answering. If you ask me about my waist size I'll tell you to fuck off.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:37 AM
1

You certainly care enough to be crying about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:33 AM
0

Not at all. According to the video, women prefer guys who are taller, but get uncomfortable when asked specific questions about weight and waist size. I would too, it's a perfectly normal reaction.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:31 AM
0

Then why do the girls, when asked, get embarrassed as they realize the double standard? No one can know due to the way the video is edited. Also, insulting people that disagree with you is a good way to invalidate all your arguments immediately. Only if you're an idiot who doesn't even know what ad hominem is.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 02:29 AM
0

The video might be formatted as an attempt to show hypocrisy, but it fails spectacularly. Asking if someone likes taller or shorter people isn't the same as asking about the exact waist size. It shows absolutely no double standard.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 01:58 AM
–

Height isnt personal? How is it being important not shaming people about their height of which they cannot control? They weren't shaming anyone. Liking taller or shorter men is a preference, and liking skinnier or fatter women is a preference as well. Asking someone's height or weight right in their face to determine if they're dateable or not, isn't. To be honest, I don't expect you to understand something so simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 01:37 AM
-1

Seems like it's a pretty solid equivalence to me and everyone else in this thread. It is a solid equivalence, and it's exactly the reason why the video's questions aren't. If a girl is right in front of you and asks what your height is to see if she's interested then it'd be incredibly insulting. She can see you are tall, why should you being 6'2" instead of 6'3" matter? Same thing with a guy being right in front of her and asking how much she weights before deciding. He can see her, he can tell…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 01:30 AM
-1

Yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 01:15 AM
–

I've actually dated a girl who was only an inch shorter than me which made her taller with high heels, and I can honestly say I prefer shorter women.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 12:44 AM
–

I honestly couldn't relate to it at all. The overwhelming majority of the women interviewed said they just want a guy who's taller than they are. I feel the exact same way, I would very much prefer a woman who's shorter than I am. Also, those edits couldn't be more annoying.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 11:50 PM
1

It wasn't that she didn't do it perfectly, its that she purposely chose the most misandrist method possible. Why you support this is beyond me.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:46 AM
1

I fully agree with the quote, and what you do in that case is reserve a few hours for the girls to play with the toys by themselves. Hours. Not months. Hours.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 01:29 AM
1

From what jbbbb said it looks exactly like what the article has stated.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 11:08 PM
2

One thing is having to wait a few months to get something you want. Another is watching someone else play with it for 2 months while you're not allowed for reasons you don't understand.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 11:00 PM
2

Yes, and a short period is in no way 2 entire months. A short period would be 2h every afternoon, or every other day. 2 entire months? That's complete asinine.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:55 PM
1

There's tons of cool shit to do in that class. As long as it's good for cognitive development, right?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:54 PM
3

No but that's understandable and teaches the kids to share. Banning for 1-2 months is just completely ridiculous. I bet that after 2 months the kids don't even remember why they were banned from playing with lego and will have learned nothing.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:55 PM
3

a short period of "test" What the hell are you talking about? The dude admitted she would take legos away from the boys for 2 entire months! That's an entire lifetime for them. How can you say this is sensible in any way?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:30 PM
9

To say she made a four or eight week 'girls only' lego period is fine. No, it's not. Punishing children for 1-2 months by taking their toys away just for being themselves is not fine. I have no idea why anyone would upvote your comment, I honestly pity your kids.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:07 PM
1

What comment? Can you link it instead of the username?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:52 PM
2

Sure, there are dozens of developed countries with a birth rate crisis forced to adopt measures like 5 whole years of paid maternity leave, but of course the lack of children isn't an issue!
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:54 PM
1

I don't even understand the question.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:37 PM
1

What exactly is so hard to understand? Honestly, what are you having trouble with? Do you not know anyone whose parents both work? Where do you live?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:26 PM
1

The parents? I thought that much was obvious.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:04 PM
0

I read the first paragraph, did not inspire me to read the rest. I could give you examples on how feminism is working against men's rights Once again, I don't give a crap. That's not what my comment was about so why you feel the need to reply with irrelevant regurgitation of why feminists are the root of all evil is beyond me. If you're not going to make a relevant reply then just don't reply at all.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:08 PM
1

Oh I have no issue with women raising their children. I know you don't, that's abundantly clear, but that's not even the issue. This sub is called MensRights for a reason.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:58 PM
1

do both parents have a part-time job, the sum of the income of which (in my experience having two jobs in college) is less that of one full-time job? No. Here's a simple idea: They both have full-time jobs and share the responsibilities equally.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:47 PM
–

Please don't assume that your opinion is everybody's opinion nor that the validity of an argument depends on its popularity. I didn't, I just said your comment pointlessly rambles on about feminism and I for one am not particularly interested in searching through the crap to find a relevant statement to my post. If you want to whine about feminism this and feminism that then go ahead, just don't expect other people to eagerly welcome pointless and derailing comments. There's a difference between…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:35 PM
–

You seem to really enjoy rambling on about feminism. So much so that your entire point is lost.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:55 PM
–

You're a complete idiot, aren't you? A woman can give birth and be working 2 weeks later fully recovered. A 2 week break has no impact on your career. Instead you seem to think that being pregnant means you're out for 9 months. Even if you're gay this is still something you should know. I have no idea how you can be so detached from reality.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:32 PM
2

Alternatively, she could have worn a simple face mask that costs 5 cents. Your problem wasn't a pregnant vet, your problem was a retarded one.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:21 PM
–

WTF are you talking about? Nothing you said makes any sense. Honestly, do you have a brain you can use? Because I assure you that would really come in handy.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:31 PM
–

Every individual should have the right to have a child or work, or do both (women). And men can choose to work or starve. So once again, women have to choose to have kids or work, but men don't have that choice? And do you honestly believe that women can't work while pregnant? What the fuck are you on? Maternity/Paternity leave is about giving parents the right to choose who takes care of the kid AFTER the child is born. Engineers, Scientists, Doctors, Lawyers Pharmacists, Managers, etc. can kee…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:14 PM
–

But everything you just said goes against Men's Rights. Did you say men should have the same right as women to stay home and raise the kids? How burdens should be equally shared between both men and women? No, you just whined about how men should earn more because of their societal roles.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:56 PM
1

It is men's rights 'related', but it's the exact opposite of what you're saying. Society needs couples to have kids or our entire civilization will simply collapse, but instead of having that burden shared between men and women right now pretty much only women are allowed/forced to put their careers on hold. Your position of 'it's women's jobs to raise children and their careers should suffer for it' is against everything men's rights represent. I don't even know why you're in this sub.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:52 PM
5

Step 3 - Sit back and watch as society collapses due to the lack of children.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:45 PM
1

A different brain structure should only prove that their gender dysphoria is a result of unnatural brain structure, like plenty of other mental illnesses. That is true, but now you have three options: Attempt to change the brain structure with brain surgery, unequivocally killing the patient in the process. Get them on hormonal treatment and/or surgery so they can become who their brain tells them they should be. Force them to live a miserable life by not treating their gender dysphoria. Persona…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/17 01:17 AM
2

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20032-transsexual-differences-caught-on-brain-scan/ In a separate study, the team used the same technique to compare white matter in 18 male-to-female transsexual people with that in 19 males and 19 females. Surprisingly, in each transsexual person’s brain the structure of the white matter in the four regions was halfway between that of the males and females (Journal of Psychiatric Research, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.11.007). “Their brains are not comp…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 06:05 PM
–

His argument is incredibly clear. Either you did not watch the video or you're as brain dead as an elephant turd. There is no other explanation.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 02:04 PM
–

I'm pretty sure we watched the same exact clip and he really doesn't. He's just using peer pressure as a means to argue. He doesn't make any intelligent comment, but because other people laugh at what he says the girl chokes up and can't speak naturally. Even when she can speak up others people's laughing and noises muffle her out. It's really just that. Honestly, his argument against transgenders is that if a person identifies as the other gender then they must also identify as a 60 year old. R…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 11:58 PM
–

No idiot.. It's 'your'. Holy shit how retarded can you get?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 11:32 PM
–

Exactly, why the fuck are you saying they do? ME: The girl scouts does not accept transgendered boys YOU: Wrong idiot
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 11:28 PM
–

You're a complete idiot. Honestly, you're dumb as fuck. Learn how to read fuckface. GIRL SCOUTS DO NOT ACCEPT TRANSGENDERED BOYS.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 11:21 PM
–

sure retard
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 11:08 PM
–

I've always understood, you're the idiot who can't even read a simple sentence. Go back to preschool or something, your reading comprehension is severely lacking. but as this post infers you disagree with the idea that a MtF transgendered girl would be accepted in the girl scouts. No you shit-face. You may be a waste of oxygen that hasn't learned how to read, but anyone smarter than a fish can tell you're full of shit. Honestly, all you have to do is read the fucking comments, and you can't do t…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 09:18 PM
–

Stop being a degenerate sexist pig. Women should be allowed to get a divorce if they wish, only someone as disgusting as you would be against it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 09:03 PM
–

Are you an idiot? Honestly, are you? FFS how much a retard can someone be. I'll spell it out for you: Transgendered girls are allowed in the girl scouts. Transgendered boys are NOT allowed in the girl scouts. That said, if the child is recognized by the family and school/community as a girl and lives culturally as a girl, then Girl Scouts is an organization that can serve her in a setting that is both emotionally and physically safe. If you cannot understand something so simple then I'm afraid y…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 08:41 PM
–

No, they are not. The girl scouts does not accept transgendered boys, only girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:57 PM
–

That said, if the child is recognized by the family and school/community as a girl and lives culturally as a girl, then Girl Scouts is an organization that can serve her in a setting that is both emotionally and physically safe. No, they are not. They very clearly state they accept transgendered children as long as they are girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:52 PM
–

This is about PPD, not about being a sexist disgusting piece of shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:47 PM
–

That isn't even relevant. This is not about a wife not getting any money from the divorce, it's about a woman not being allowed to get a divorce unless the husband allows it. Nothing in the article even mentions money, OP just pulled the title of this post out of his own ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:45 PM
–

Wait, what kind of sick law doesn't allow people to get divorced? Is this the 1800s? I assumed by the title that she wouldn't get any money or something, but the title is 100% made up. The problem is that she cannot get divorced no matter what without her husbands consent. How fucked up is that?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:42 PM
82

Transgendered boys aren't allowed in the Girl Scouts, for obvious reasons...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 07:14 PM
5

Did you just mimic a conversation so you can brag to the internet that you're a man who doesn't cry? That's not cringy at all...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 04:29 AM
–

Nope, that's why celebrities can't just tell everyone to fuck off either.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/17 06:19 PM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:16 AM
7

I'm all for that, but in this sub people like tractionjackson often make it seem like women are the most evil and useless thing on the face of the planet. My point is that it's not about gender, men can be just as bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:33 PM
0

And for that reason I'm pretty sure you made everything up in your posts. You've never had guys trying to take on more than they can chew to try and prove they're manly? Sure buddy.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:30 PM
1

but feminism as a term, in the context of men's rights, is often a negative one. I never redefined anything. That's pretty much exactly what you did. Until both sides stop making asinine generalizations that everyone in the other group is evil we'll never get anywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:24 PM
1

The only one doing that here is you. If people like you stopped making stupid generalizations we wouldn't have a problem in the first place. You're as worse as the feminazis that say all men are rapists.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:21 PM
0

I agree 100%. The biggest problem with all these problems is that they don't even try to fix the issue, they just want to make it seem like they do for political reasons. You're not going to get someone interested in engineering by tilting the system in their favor, no one's going to go 'oh I hate math, physics and programming but those grants for electrical engineering are pretty good'. If someone does that then they'll be stuck with it for the rest of their lives if they manage to graduate in …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:16 PM
–

That's funny, I've had the opposite experience. How many times do I see a skinny guy trying to lift something that's clearly beyond his means, only to waste time and get it poorly done or potentially hurting himself? At least girls will say 'I can't do it, can you help?', and I wish more guys were like that. No one's less of a man just because they can't lift something heavy so just use your brain, ask for help and get out of the way. /rant
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:01 PM
–

By putting the entire blame on the girl you are saying the step-father is not to blame for terrifying and forcing the little girl he was raping into lying to the court. There's no way around it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 12:52 AM
–

Are you going to give the girl her life back? Or do you think it was okay that she kept being raped after the guy went to jail because she was a small girl and all females have to die? Honestly, people like you are disgusting. What kind of sick human being do you have to be to defend the step-father that was raping and abusing her, and continued to do so after the trial, and instead put all the blame a the little girl? Truly disgusting.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 12:08 AM
3

No, it's not. But the ones at fault here are the judge, jury, prosecutor and cops, not the little girl who was being raped and feared for her life. You have to remember that the wrong guy being sent to jail did not help her at all, she most likely kept being raped and abused. The system failed to protect her, who was being raped, and failed to protect the cop, who was falsely accused.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 12:03 AM
–

In this sub the only thing that matters is that women, regardless if they did something wrong or not, get burnt at the stake. The cops and prosecutor that charged the guy with rape without any evidence cannot be at fault because they were men. The jury that decided he was guilty without seeing any evidence cannot be at fault because some of them were men. The judge that decided his sentence cannot be at fault because he was a man. The man that was raping and threatening her cannot be at fault be…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/17 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter