Cowbili Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
217	Whamen dont meed no man	Feminism	Cowbili	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 04:17 PM
71	This is feminism. It was NEVER about "equality". it was about superiority and revenge	Feminism	Cowbili	/r/MensRights	02/09/19 03:02 PM
1	BREAKING NEWS		Cowbili	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 05:55 AM
1	I liked this meme		Cowbili	/r/MensRights	04/10/19 02:06 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	This is feminism. It was NEVER about "equality". it was about superiority and revenge True. but by that same standard we should also not care if it's a nine men. And that would be true equality. But they're clearly werentt at that point because because you know that if it was ever 9 then they would be flipping out. And people like Ruth bader Ginsburg would be calling at sexism	/r/MensRights	03/09/19 05:01 PM
1	This is feminism. It was NEVER about "equality". it was about superiority and revenge When people criticized Obama they were said that it was racism. That they just didn't like the black president. The reality is that when people criticize Trump it's because they don't like him is being whitee	/r/MensRights	03/09/19 05:00 PM
3	This is feminism. It was NEVER about "equality". it was about superiority and revenge https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/287179-ruth-bader-ginsberg-if-trump-wins-time-to-move-to-new	/r/MensRights	02/09/19 05:34 PM
0	This is feminism. It was NEVER about "equality". it was about superiority and revenge She said shed move to canada if a white male president was elected (trump)	/r/MensRights	02/09/19 04:04 PM
3	This community should have more members... Most men have no idea that there is a growing movement for their well being. Every group is going to have a few extremists. You just have to make it clear that those people don't represent you.	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:39 PM
3	Camille Paglia: Neo feminism teaching women to live in ‘a permanently juvenile condition’ yep. The government was never created is and supposed to be a employment agency. And yet it provides more lenient working conditions then the private sector the most jobs are expected to work and if you don't they can fire you. If you work for the government you can basically be a lazy assholes who does basically nothing and they probably won't even try to fire you. And if they did it would be so many loopholes and Hoops to jump through that it's almost not worth it and this gets even worse when…	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:37 PM
29	Camille Paglia: Neo feminism teaching women to live in ‘a permanently juvenile condition’ If a woman wants to bang other men then that's her decision and she's a strong woman and you have to support her needs if a man wants to bang other women then he's an abusive asshole who's a dirty cheater and doesn't deserve her	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:34 PM
9	Feminists say they are fighting against sexism. Ironically they themselves are sexist. And there are so many examples proving that you can't even list them all in one comment. it was never about equality. They only talked about equality in order to get to the point where they could push for Supremacy A lot of these usurping groups use that tactic. When they're in the minority or out of power don't constantly talk about quality and being equally represented.	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:30 PM
2	Debunking some divisive myths that can create tensions between the genders 80% of white people did not vote for Trump but it was either 70 or 80% of women voted for Hillary. That alone proves their bias. And it most likely was not anything particular to Hillary's platform as much as she looked like them When the majority of black people for the first time ever vote in an election to elect a black man it's probably not because of his policies. And when a large number of women that make the majority vote for Hillary it's also not because of her policies. Since both of th…	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:29 PM
1	Debunking some divisive myths that can create tensions between the genders I think it could also do with a little more nuanced. Like for the first example about not all women being working for the right to vote that's true. But there were also a lot of men that were working on behalf of women to get them the right to vote. So it wasn't really a man vs woman thing as much as it was just some people versus some other people. Both genders were on both sides of the issue	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:26 PM
2	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? At the very least it should start when it's able to feel pain. At that point it's barbaric	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:24 PM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? Course it was early feminists. Later feminists were against embryo. The point is but it was never really about women's rights or choice or any of that. It was always about them wanting all of these decisions to be surely decided by women. Female superiority. I'm considering the feminists aren't really going out there protesting the idea of alimony and it's showing that they want the decision can be made by women but it has to be paid for by men Although realistically I think it's unfair to say t…	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:22 PM
2	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? that's a great point! In fact they are developing the ability to do just that! And guess how feminists feel about it? That's right! "Pro-choice" women are actually against it Which means it's not actually about choice or women making decisions as much as its they just want to be able to kill the baby and use abortion as their primary form of birth control	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:20 PM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? except it's not women's rights. It actually has nothing to do with women. Women aren't even in the equation and they should just go home because it has literally nothing to do with women It's about fetuses. Women can take their overinflated Egos and go home because the world does not revolve around them. People are much less concerned with them than feminists think they are It has to do with the practice of murder. It doesn't matter how Justified you feel in murdering someone. Doesn't make it ri…	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:19 PM
6	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? but that logic nobody can help make decisions about anything that they don't have personal experience with. Not going owners can't make laws about guns. People who have never served in the military can't help make decisions about the military budget. Poor people can't decide what the tax rate on rich people should be. And women shouldn't listen to their gynecologist if he's a man because he doesn't have a vagina. Even if he studied for years to become an expert in his field. It's a ridiculous an…	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 06:17 PM