TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CoyoteSmarts Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by CoyoteSmarts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For you, it would okay if a man took whatever precautions he thought necessary? Of course I'd be okay with him suggesting precautions, but that's not the same thing as agreeing to participate in those precautions. If a man suggested something that doesn't work for me, I wouldn't get angry about it. I'd understand, but it would mean that we're fundamentally incompatible. On the flipside, a guy should understand if I (or any other woman) reject their solution. Relationships are a negotiation. That…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:42 PM
2

You could see it that way if you want to. For me, it's more a recognition that shit happens, people change their minds, and sometimes their response to a situation is completely different to how they THOUGHT they'd respond to a situation. (Such as someone thinking they would/could abort, but deciding they can't do it once they're actually pregnant.) Which is fine - no need for judgment because we're all guilty of this to some extent - but if you absolutely do NOT want to be responsible for a pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:51 AM
2

creates resentment in men because it becomes this thing that they can't control They can control it - they just don't like how they can control it. (Don't ejaculate inside a woman's body under any condition unless you're willing to unconditionally accept responsibility for a pregnancy.) It's just like...most people don't get behind the wheel of a car with any intention of having a car accident - and we do our best to avoid car accidents. But we all know and understand that if we (or a malfunctio…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:47 PM
1

Why is the man not given an equal choice? He is. Reproductive agency is tied to bodily autonomy for both genders. Everybody's reproductive agency ends once their reproductive contribution exits their body. If you choose to ejaculate inside a woman, you've legally tied your consent to whatever she decides, because it's no longer about your body - it's about hers. Just like, once the baby leaves her body, she no longer has agency over that baby's "right to live." Arguments about failed contracepti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:20 PM
-1

Yep - just like the women keep saying - no accountability. Just whiny, pathetic excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 09:42 PM
11

My brother is a clean freak. When he's single, he scrubs and organizes his apartment like a man gone mad. But the moment he gets a live-in girlfriend (or for the 9 months he lived with me), he turns into an entitled, lazy-ass mo-fo who takes no accountability for living in a household.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:15 PM
1

Because sex workers aren't subject to their clients' whims once they're "off the clock." They can even indulge in romantic/sexual relationships they ENJOY when they're not working. In contrast, a professional girlfriend/wife would always be "on the clock" with an expectation of monogamy. No time off - no reprieve - from a tedious and extremely pandering customer service job. So it boils down to autonomy and freedom. (Shocking, I know!)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:11 AM
2

Perfectly said.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:46 PM
9

You know that idiomatic advice, "Don't do business with family or friends"? All the reasons behind that warning apply to financial dependence on a romantic partner. But more specifically: Emotional/relationship problems can leave you financially fucked You have fewer options/opportunities to leave an unhappy or abusive situation When someone has financial leverage over you, they have relational leverage (power dynamics) This makes you more likely to capitulate when you don't want to (contrived s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:03 PM
1

lol - right?!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 06:38 PM
1

The data is a little murky though. No, it's not murky - it's consistent with what I'm saying. The high Beta Error (0.5) for women cumming during/after the man's orgasm means there's a 50/50 chance male attractiveness actually has no effect on women who have to "work" for their orgasm - which makes sense because the dude can manually or orally finish her off, or she can finish herself off. The -0.06 Beta Error is for total female orgasms and women who orgasm BEFORE the man. In other words, male a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 06:36 PM
6

Okay, then how about this more intensive study where they compared self-report measures from the women, their male partners, and compared them to objective measures of masculinity, symmetry, and attractiveness? The correlations are stronger, too. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513811000250 For the record, I don't deny that lusty attraction is more subjective and personality-nuanced than OP wants to claim - even the second study shows how lengthier relationships also c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:50 PM
6

I hate to say it, but the science is with OP on this one. Women orgasm more with hot men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26193479/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:45 PM
–

I can make this super simple for you OP. Taking a shit is the most natural thing in the world. It goes beyond a biological drive - it's a physical need for survival. If we don't do it, we die. If we ignore the defecation urge when it strikes, we can end up constipated, which leads to discomfort, hemorrhoids, and fissures. Nobody on this planet would seriously condemn another human for needing to shit or excusing themselves to take a shit. But pretty much everybody (except certain fetishists) con…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 03:51 AM
1

Under most government systems, reproductive responsibilities are non-transferrable. PERIOD. (Apart from adoption or a court-approved forfeiture of parental rights.) Legally, there's an unspoken "no verbal agreement shall void or modify the terms and conditions" clause when it comes to parental responsibilities, so you still own full responsibility when you trust someone else with your reproductive rights. To which people might say, "I didn't know that!" Well, the law has an answer for that, too:…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:46 PM
1

When it comes to reproductive responsibilities, everybody's consent is restricted to the confines of their bodily autonomy. For women, that just so happens to come later in the process than it does for men. (From a legal standpoint, sperm ejaculated into a fertile lady = baby exiting the vagina.) For both genders, our options stop when they overlap with someone else's bodily autonomy - which is where the debate about abortion comes in. (Is the fetus a person and does its rights override the woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 04:44 PM
1

I presume you would agree that women have an artistic sense, just as men do? (Hopefully so.) So now, having an artistic sense typically means they're going to have a taste for beauty, no? (I mean, why else would someone have knick-knacks, artwork, plants, pretty bedspreads, matching towel sets around their house/room/apartment? Do you honestly think these folks are decorating for other people or for themselves?) Well, why wouldn't that desire to ENJOY a beautiful environment include yourself? Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 07:07 PM
13

It's pretty simple. Anytime you escalate your presence someone's physical or social bubble without invitation and beyond what you'd do for a random stranger that you're not attracted to...you're crossing a boundary. Why is that? Because you're assuming (or hoping for) retroactive permission to change the social contract by promoting your intimacy privileges. Case in point, I had a friendly chat with a male customer the other day. There wasn't even any flirting. He came back the next day and afte…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:23 PM
5

This is true. It's one thing to warn my nieces or nephew about the potential pitfalls and losses of excessive shallowness, because I have no dog in that fight - other than caring about their happiness. I don't get angry if they ignore me because those are their choices to make. It's their lives, their consequences...for better or worse. But as soon as someone goes off on a judgemental or embittered rant about other people's standards, you know you're dealing with someone who's trying to psycholo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 12:53 AM
1

Most people aren't thinking they'll die when they try to save someone else. They have some sense of efficacy. Example: If I tackle the shooter, I can overpower him. More often than not, they save on reflex - no thought at all. Example: Pushing someone out of the way instead of running yourself. But let's say none of these things are true - someone gets the opportunity to weigh the cost-benefits of saving a "loved" one. There's a big difference between making a choice to avoid emotional loss and …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 06:20 PM
3

And the average man in the US is 5'9" and 199 pounds with a waist measurement of 40.5 inches. (The ideal waist to height ratio for men is 1:2, so a 59" man *should* have a 29.5 inch waist.) The obesity epidemic isn't limited to women, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:11 AM
3

There's more than one way to cable pull, and the movement dictates the muscle group. https://fitnessprogramer.com/exercise/cross-cable-face-pull/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 08:27 PM
1

Because your explanation is bullshit. You're not breaking up with her because you love her and care about her wellfare. You're breaking up with her because you don't want to fuck her anymore. It's fine to want what you want in a romantic relationship...but don't play the hero and try to gaslight her into believing that your fair-weather affection and cruelty are for her own good. Fuck off with that abusive, narcissistic pomposity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 03:56 PM
12

Uterine and small bowel perforation are risk factors for IUD devices. Pelvic inflammatory disease and infection are other potential side effects. (Basically, things that can cause permanent infertility or even death if left untreated.) They can also spontaneously eject from the uterus without detection. These things are statistically "rare" (1 in 1000 chance for perforation), but why choose something with any risk when you choose something with no risk? Such as a condom?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 02:16 AM
4

OP straight up says he thinks women shouldn't be offended when random men approach them start spew vulgarity at them. (Chopped up and emphasized for easy reading.) Note: I’m not saying it’s ok to continue to be sexually vulgar verbally if someone isn’t receptive to your first advance. But I also don’t see the issue with initially saying some freaky shit. If you don’t like it, just be like ew sorry I don’t want you no need to get offended and all this men aren’t shit stuff. A lot of women are jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:30 PM
–

lololololololol Even long before the days of dating apps, about 30 years ago, I had a fuckboi co-worker who confessed that men's standards for sex are variable and based on a simple equation: Number of Options + Ideal Standard - (Time Since Last Sex * Amount of Alcohol Consumed)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:51 PM
–

Here's the truth, though... That version of romantic love you're talking about? It doesn't stick around. Even in the best relationships, it starts to fade after x amount of time. (6 months-2 years) It's called New Relationship Energy. So if your happiness and sense of purpose are based strictly on NRE...guess what? Eventually you'll be back to feeling like your life is empty, has no meaning, blah, blah, blah IN SPITE of being in a LTR. And if you're that kind of person who can't find some manner…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:30 PM
–

Oh, you mean the women who saw the logical writing on the wall and understood that refusal would lead to mistreatment, abuse, and violent rape (if not death), so they "willingly" partnered up? Sorry buddy. That's still rape. It falls under coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:00 PM
3

OP's solution is in the post: ENFORCED monogamy. Sexual Marxism backed with regulation. In other words, nobody gets laid outside of a singular marriage. Restricted (or non-existent) divorce. Problem is, OP also claims he doesn't want to "force" women to be with guys they're not attracted to, but that's exactly what enforced monogamy would require to accomplish what OP wants. (Every dude gets a woman, regardless of his fitness/desirability as a mate.)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:46 PM
-1

Hm. Congratz on totally ignoring the significant amount of gendered disrespect he leveled at women while insisting that women are the bigoted ones if they don't "respect" him the way he feels entitled to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:37 PM
0

How about human beings should offer general respect to each other? The problem with insisting that women should specifically "respect" men is because of the sheer mass of gendered disrespect women receive from men ALL the fucking time. Even the way men disparage each other by comparing them to women or women's reproductive bits. ("Don't be a girl/bitch/pussy." "Grow some balls." Or even "Emotional tampon." when sponge would work just fine - but dudes just have to add that extra stab of "gross" s…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:34 PM
4

One element of creepiness is ignoring social cues, context, boundaries, discomfort, lack of interest, etc. It's basically about not respecting another person's physical and/or psychological space. It's tangential to consent. So by it's very definition, if someone doesn't WANT your attention, presence, or behavior and you ignore that...then you're creepy. Now sure, your behavior might be creepy to Person X because they're not attracted to you, but Person Y has no problem with it because they thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:13 AM
3

Disclaimer: I hate any and ALL self-propaganda with the fire of 1,000 suns. I believe in actions, not words. What follows is an explanation, not an endorsement. The two expressions are NOT synonymous. In the context that people use "strong and independent", they're stating: that their abundance and lifestyle are not sponsored by a personal or romantic relationship that they're assertive about getting what they want for themselves; they're willing to hustle You can be a functional adult and depen…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:31 PM
4

In the context of that specific TikTok, she's a very pretty, feminine-presenting woman, and it looks like she supports herself MUCH better than the average person. (She's drives a Mercedes, goes on luxury trips, etc.) So she probably gets smeared with the sugarbaby/kept woman brush quite a bit - or the "fucked her way to the top" permutation of it. That's what she's responding to. (She's a social media manager, BTW.)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 09:24 AM
25

Technically, you don't even need ejaculation. Leaky precum can do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:48 AM
1

What definition of authenticity do you have? Mine is: "behaving in a way that's consistent with who you really are, what you really want, and how you really feel." Example: A woman who says she loves [insert your favorite sporting event] when you're dating. She attends events with you; she's happy to host viewing parties with you. Then once you're married/cohabiting, the truth comes out over time. She doesn't like it that much, and her participation stops or slows down. (You might host a party t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 02:39 PM
1

Even this desire people have for "authenticity" is, in fact, just a desire for consistency and maintaining ongoing transactions they have with other people. Not at all. People who want authenticity are people who want connection from their relationships. If you're inauthentic, then so is the connection. For example, if your condition for a relationships is having a similar sense of humor, that means you feel bonded/connected to people when you laugh together or your eyes meet knowingly across th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:13 PM
3

In my opinion, unconditional love does exists, but we call it compassion. The thing about compassion is... it's unsustainable as a persistent state it drains tangible and intangible resources neither is infinite in abundance too much compassion for others is self-destructive (aka doormat) too much compassion is destructive for others (aka enabling behavior) https://psychcentral.com/health/are-you-an-enabler it's extremely important for LT relationships but... persistent compassion for someone = …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:13 PM
1

Nah, when a woman says, "I don't see you like that," she's plainly saying that she doesn't find you physically attractive. Period. She's saying, straight up, she has no interest in fucking you. And I mean, what makes people want to have sex with each other 99% of the time? Physical attraction. So when someone you're otherwise close to says they haven't even thought about having sex with you...it doesn't take 160 IQ to do the math. Pretending there's any ambiguity to it is a lame-ass game of weap…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:19 PM
11

I’m not sure why the look comes into style occasionally Because properly fitted, high-waisted pants flatter a feminine figure cinched waist, pleated/flared hips (8) https://www.walmart.com/ip/RYRJJ-Straight-Wide-Leg-Long-Trousers-with-Tie-Belt-for-Women-Pleated-Front-High-Waisted-Business-Work-Pants-Elegant-Dress-Trousers-Pink-XXL/2803586119 https://kj-img.pddpic.com/product/Fancyalgo/VirtualModelMatting/4b0261b55a749682d72297fe7f2e4497.jpg versus a straight cut (|) https://www.pinterest.com/pin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 01:39 PM
2

Beauty *is* a social status and dating a beautiful woman increases *your* social status. Plenty of guys admit that it's a conscious preference, too: "I want a woman who makes my friends jealous."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:20 PM
18

OP's making a fundamental correlation = causation error. First, let's not forget that those antidepressant stats aren't just truly single women. They include divorced, separated, and widowed women. In other words, ladies who wanted and tried marriage, but it failed or their mate died. During 2015–2018, 13.6% of adults aged ≥20 years used prescription antidepressant medications in the past 30 days. Antidepressant use was higher among divorced, separated, or widowed (20.5%) adults than among eithe…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:38 PM
23

And set a boundary for yourself. "Marriage/kids are a fundamental joy I want to experience. I will not sacrifice that for a relationship where it doesn't come to pass within X amount of time." Check in with your partner, express where you're at, see where they're at, and if they've only got more words when the deadline comes - move on. No matter how much you love somebody, and regardless of how good a person they are, if you're incompatible - you're incompatible. Plus even "good" people can be i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 06:01 PM
1

*** Insert Inigo Montoya GIF **\* You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 12:06 AM
10

First, let me establish that I'm a woman, and I've had to contend with men in my family who became abusive in the face of "female defiance." When I was 12, my dad tackled me, straddled my chest, and slammed my head into the carpeted floor repeatedly as he shook me by my shoulders. Why? Because I called my brothers to dinner and it hurt his ear. And yes, I've had to deal with men flipping out over rejection. A "friend" who threatened to rape me. Older brothers who'd thump on me for fun. An ex-boy…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:33 PM
–

Been true for me and for 95% of my friends who had success with women. I've seen it play out firsthand with one of my older brothers, so I can vouch that it's a real thing. The problem is a lot of guys can't imagine being *so* successful with women that they'd ever get bored with it. That's not to say all men would end up this way, but many of them do, and it's not just because they *need* to settle down. My brother was 26 when he switched to LTR mode. But even the ending of "The Good Place" tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:28 PM
-1

Dude, save your RP rhetoric for another day - this thread isn't about any of that. It's about how male characters are portrayed. That said, regardless of what Jane would or wouldn't have done if he were handsome...she fell in love with him as he was. And the author was quite clear about Rochester not being what Jane (or society) found "hot" in men at the time. I recognized his decisive nose, more remarkable for character than beauty, his full nostrils, denoting, I thought, choler; his grim mouth…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:05 AM
11

Rochester was NOT handsome. From the Jane Eyre wiki: Rochester is described to be very ugly - a dark face, with stern features, a craggy face and a heavy brow. He is 'pigeon-chested' and he is around middle-age, 35 years or so. He has a shaggy 'mane' of black hair. After the fire at Thornfield, he loses a hand and his sight, (which is only returned after he marries Jane). In the novel, he is often compared to a wild beast or bird. Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice) was repulsive to Elizabeth in spi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 04:52 PM
–

And even after it collapsed, almost nobody dared to blame women's behavior even though it's self-evident. Right. So getting their asses kicked by the Germanic and Goth tribes, crazy inflation & taxation, losing slave labor because they ran out of places to conquer, a tidal wave of emperor assassinations, having too much territory to protect and cohere as a nation, the rise of Christianity - none of that matters. It was all the fault of women who were granted a modicum of social and financial ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 11:08 AM
1

You might believe you're being nice or polite, but the truth is different. In these moments, what's oozing out of every pore from you is fear And not just fear, but downright inferiority It's not just a cue for fear or inferiority - it's a cue of inauthenticity. Nobody (barring narcisissists) want inauthentic schmoozers around. Why do you think celebrities and wealthy folks of both genders tend to be friends with other celebrities and wealthy folks? It's because they don't want the schmoozers wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:06 PM
1

No, you weren't wrong to fight back. When people choose to act like rabid animals, more often than not, the only thing that reaches them - is being treated like a rabid animal. I'm a woman, but I had several similar experiences in grade and middle school with different bullies. (Some boys, some girls.) The pattern was always the same - after so long of me not reacting to social bullying, they'd escalate to physical abuse, so I'd fight back and win. (I had 2 significantly older brothers who'd bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:14 AM
4

That's OP's point, actually. The consequences of accepting a bad relationship instead of no relationship are dire for your long-term happiness and mental health. Even if your attitude is, "I'm just enduring this for sexual access" - those negative experiences still tend to seep into your world view and ultimately, your mental health.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 05:48 AM
3

Yes, but it was an entertaining read all the same. Upvoted for sheer creativity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:34 PM
0

Heh. Hanlon's razor is at play here, OP. And it's not that your co-workers are stupid, but they are employing an implicit exception that you're failing to see. What's the exception? If they're marrying a guy, it's because they WANT to deal with him. They would LOVE this hypothetical husband because he'd be an exception to the men they're dealing with NOW. This is the man they'd want babies with - their chosen lifemate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 01:38 PM
–

Nah. Here's the reason women choose the bear. Being in the woods is a very different scenario than being stuck in a 10x10 room. I guarantee you, if the question had been asked this way first, you would've gotten a different majority answer. (There still would've been some women who joked around with "bear" answers, but you'd throw those out in a true study.) But here's where women are coming from with "the woods" scenario (quoteblock just for readability): Women are presuming "the woods" is a la…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 01:14 PM
1

I mean, certainly - organized religion is an easy tool for cultural control over a population's behaviors. It's a low-fi Matrix. It's not specific to creating sexual socialism, though. There are polygynous and even polyandrous religions, which simply provide spiritual rationalizations for sexual capitalism. Even the Biblical text of "Be fruitful and multiply" was directed at Noah, who had 4 wives. lol If you're referring to the Catholic Church, however...then yes. It's possible they specifically…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 06:41 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7183572/#:\~:text=Intelligence%20can%20be%20defined%20as,and%20subject%20to%20continual%20change. Naivete and stupidity are two different things. The first is a lack of wisdom (life experience), the second is insufficient intelligence (cognitive function). So when people take issue with age-gap relationships, they’re not declaring the younger partner stupid (unable to make reasonable choices when it comes to career, politics, or contracts) - they’re declaring the …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:48 AM
1

Assuming that only 1 group would lie on self-report measures as copium for regret is what the scientific community calls: COGNITIVE BIAS. That said, I guess it's good that we have molecular biology to back up what women are self-reporting. Motherhood ages a woman's DNA by as much as 11 years in comparison to the DNA of a childless woman. The telomere shortening was greater than that you would find with obesity or smoking. https://www.newsweek.com/having-children-could-literally-shorten-womens-li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 08:50 PM
2

Posting under AutoMod because I'm a woman. Friendship vs [FWB & Romantic Relationship] usually boils down to one thing: the presence or absence of mutual sexual attraction FWB vs Romantic Relationship will usually boil down to one of 2 things: a higher degree of sexual attraction and limerence = romantic relationship a higher degree of lifestyle compatability = LT romantic relationship (I'm emphasizing usually because there can be other circumstances, such as timing, at play.) Some people might …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:32 PM
–

I think I get what you're trying to ask... Maybe you adore somebody's creativity (thinking), but they're a slob at home (doing). Reverse: they're super clean and do chores, but they never think about anything new. They're a lot of fun to BE with (thinking/conversation), but they can't hold a job (doing). Reverse: they're a leader in their field with good income, but they're a dullard to be with. They have a strong sense of integrity (thinking), but they pick their nose (doing). Reverse: No disgu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:53 PM
18

Even more specifically - watch how they treat other people when there's no benefit to them and they don't think anyone else is watching. Or, watch how they treat other people when shit's hitting the fan in their life. How much pressure does it take for them to become impatient? How impatient do they get? Do they turn cruel or contemptuous? How quickly do they catch themselves, take genuine ownership, and apologize? (This advice goes for men or women, BTW.)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 04:55 PM
2

They're talking about activites you can either bond over with common understanding and/or actively having fun together while doing it. For example: You both might be athletes who compete in different sports, but you still share an understanding of the other person's competitive psychology and feel a connection to them because of that bond. You go to each other's events whenever possible and genuinely ENJOY being there - it's not just a begruding obligation. Another example: You're both foodies, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:39 PM
1

Heh. Say you don't know how to read a study without saying you don't know how to read a study. We are not able to resolve these complexities here. They can't draw a reasonable conclusion. In addition, despite our efforts to remove the confound of socialization between women and men by looking at within-sex differences, our measures may capture environmental differences among women and among men beyond those based on biology. It's possibly due to socialization after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 03:33 AM
2

I think it's one of those things where you KNOW some people might assume exclusivity (even though they shouldn't) - so I still think it's a shady "technicality" to rely on "don't ask, don't tell." It's like picking up dinner for yourself on the way home, but not getting any for your spouse because they never explicitly stated beforehand, "If you're ever picking up food on the way home, text me to see if I want anything!" Maybe they won't care, but it's common sense that they MIGHT. So why be a j…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:51 PM
–

If by "population data" you mean the population of OKCupid users - sure. But as far as trying to generalize to larger populations, such as US citizens, or humans as a whole - it's data from a self-selecting sample. (Bias alert! Bias alert! External validity / generalizability: debatable.) But as long as we're dredging up this ol' nugget, let's look a little closer... The “most attractive” women receive five times as many messages as the average female does, with 2/3 of all male messages going to…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:26 PM
2

Oh for Pete's sake. No, the majority of allosexual people would NOT be happy (or stay) in a sexless romantic relationship. But while sex might be necessary for most people, that doesn't mean that it's sufficient for them. A lot of people also want a companionate/transcendant bond - aka love. And for some people, that companionate bond IS sufficient unto itself. (Asexuals, low libidos, partners of those with illness or sexual dysfunctions.) As other posters have already told you 50+ times - there…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:15 PM
12

*yawn* Educate yourself. Optimal emotional processing actually enhances our ability to navigate "reality." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361392/ Going contrary to the popular belief that the “cooler head prevails,” the results of this study make it evident that feelings and emotions experienced during decision making can have positive effects on decision-making performance. In this study, people with “hot heads”—those who experienced their feelings with greater intensity during d…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:15 PM
–

Because it's a statistical fact. Even a 5-year age gap increase your chance of divorce by 18%. https://purposedrivenlawyers.com/age-gap-and-marriage/#:\~:text=Starting%20with%20a%20reference%20point,the%20risk%20increases%2095%25!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:18 PM
–

Sorry, buddy. Biology 101: point mutations and chromosomal abnormalities are more likely to occur and less likely to be corrected in older individuals, whether we're talking mitotic or meiotic cell division. This is why older people are more prone to cancer, and yes - shitty sperm. Furthermore, the mutations and chromosomal abnormalities keep accumulating over time. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31301044/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:15 PM
7

Yep, they want to generalize purely animalistic behavior to humans but ignore the very factors that OBSERVABLY make us different. Then they say they're the "logical" ones. (Dunning-Kruger in full effect.)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:30 AM
4

Evo psych is non-falsifiable. You can twist any scenario to support your hypothesis. There's no way to scientifically test it. Too many confounding variables. Yadda yadda yadda. Also, the plasticity of the human brain and our behavior strongly indicates that a genetic predisposition is NOT fate with regard to behavioral outcomes. (Otherwise, why don't identical twins act...ya know...identically?) Versus evolutionary theory with regard to physiology - there's...ya know...a whole fossil record to …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:23 AM
0

Yeah. Psychopaths don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 02:23 PM
0

Heh. All those jobs will be on the chopping block, if not chopped, by 2040. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ECwExc-_M&t=10s
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 12:36 PM
2

IMO, at it's culturally agnostic core, masculine energy is about acting your will on the world - influencing the external to align with your internal drive/agenda. Conversely, the core of feminine energy is when you release egoic control and let the external world drive your internal experience. Doing laps in a pool = you're in masculine energy Soaking in a hot tub = you're in feminine energy Shaving your legs = masculine (because you're taking action) Enjoying the feeling of having shaved legs …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:22 PM
–

There are definitely women who LOVE doing their makeup, nails, etc. It's a form of artistic expression for them. They legitimately couldn't care less what Random Person X thinks of it. For other women, they might not LOVE doing makeup, they just want to feel pretty or sexy in general (no specific desire to attract men), and wearing makeup helps them feel that way. For yet another group of women, it IS about making their lives easier by meeting social expectations. (Attracting romance, looking mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 02:47 PM
2

Actually, I just realized in one of the following scenes, they also show the husband practicing his golf swing while the wife's stressed in the background working on their budget or taxes. lol https://youtu.be/eFTLKWw542g?t=176 But yeah, "sure" - the phenomenon of women's extra mental load is a new and baseless claim that can't be observed. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 04:50 AM
2

There's a Billy Joel video for his song "We Didn't Start the Fire" where they show a couple going through the different decades. For the 1957 scene, they depict what mental load for a 50's housewife looked like while the man gets to relax. (She's preparing lunch but stops to check hubby's progress on a hobby, she checks if a kid is hungry, she burns herself cooking dinner, and works on a bratty teen's dress.) Then they show the wife popping some good pills to cope, because as a few other people …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 04:40 AM
3

When a taxi cab's light is off, the best customers/biggest tippers in the world won't get a ride from that cab. When a taxi cab's light goes on, the very first suitable customer will get a ride - big tipper or not. Taxi light theory says that a man's desire to commit is internally driven. If his light is "OFF", he won't commit even if he's in the best relationship of his life. But when his light goes "ON", he'll settle down with his first reasonable match, even if the relationship isn't as great…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter