TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CraigJusticeFor Archive

View 5 posts and 135 comments by CraigJusticeFor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

By the way, what you said is incorrect: fat cannot be turned into muscle. First you lose the fat, then you build the muscle.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:16 AM
1

Oh I completely agree with a lot of what you are saying. Fat slobs are just plain lazy and they could improve a lot if they took care of themselves properly, and I think many men here genuinely DO want a relationship and so are just trying to improve themselves so as not to be screwed over. But see, call me a beta cuck, a blue pilled faggot, whatever, I just don't like those extreme Trump-worshipping Red Pillers who think any woman who does not look like Melania Trump is worthless and women shou…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 02:47 AM
0

Exactly, but those ugly or feminist chicks who are not viable as long-term partners are not invisible to SOCIETY, as they used to be. That's what some here can't stand.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 02:36 AM
0

But invisible in what way? What gets discussed here a lot is how feminism has given a voice and a face to many women, even those who are not pretty. This is what many here are bitter about, you nailed it: that women who do not please them are visible. If you mull on that for a bit, you come to the conclusion that this sub believes women should exist and live their lives with the pleasure of men as their primary goal.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 02:17 AM
1

I think it's a bit deeper than that, at least around here. We do not JUST discuss sexual strategy, but also how feminism has given women freedom, and how this means they do not have an incentive to be 'pleasant' anymore, and there is also a lot of hatred for how ugly girls are being pushed into the media. How the media is basically no longer built entirely for the pleasure of men. I do think (SOME) men here just hate the idea that an ugly chick can just have her freedom and her cats and even be …
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 02:14 AM
4

Now THIS is a quality post.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:48 AM
1

See, but you are still talking about the hot women who suck out your soul. I am talking about how much this sub hates the mousy nerdy librarian, who might have read enough books to be actually empathetic, but does not actually fulfil the needs of men because who would you rather fuck? Her or the hot bitch who ruins your life? Yeah. But in many ways, I think many men here hate the fact that the mousy librarian can actually have her job and economic independence and chill with her cats and make jo…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:32 AM
1

I'm not actually judging or throwing stones. Merely, I am observing and analysing a RP trend.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:28 AM
0

Jesus Christ this Atrophe1 is like, the personalisation of the 'misogynist' caricature feminists blame all men to be.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 11:07 PM
13

These men existed in the past too. There has never been a time in which 100% of the men have successfully reproduced. I know things are blown a bit out of proportion on this sub, but I mean... many men out there actually do have drive, a family etc.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 10:46 PM
2

Ah sorry, I misread. In any case, a girl who is serious about monogamy is a girl who asks for it from the start and does not go through the 'friends with benefits' period. This is a lesson for the future: if you want a monogamous girl, look out for the 'friends with benefits' red flag.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 06:18 PM
0

WELL, you expect monogamy from her, but you admitted you were texting other girls yourself. So?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 04:17 PM
18

Does anyone here actually actively HATE women?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 04:13 PM
-7

What's the point of this post, exactly? It is pretty well known she had big issues, but what is this supposed to prove to us?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 12:16 PM
9

Wait until they cook you tofu and golden linseed dinner...
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 02:10 AM
46

Whatever you do though, never LTR those weird blonde vegan yoga hoes. Ever.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 12:53 AM
2

The only time I heard an argument about the pay gap I was willing to look into was when a feminist told me women are paid less because their male bosses perceive them to be less productive than their male counterparts. It is a form of psychological discrimination, she said. But even then, you would have to look at it case by case. It cannot be an imperative in all cases.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 11:13 PM
1

Well, I think 3 is wrong because I like lots of female writers, for instance... The problem is the average Facebook-obsessed woman you meet in your everyday life.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 01:43 PM
1

This is the kind of thread that could only ever exclusively show up in an all-male sub.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 03:51 PM
0

I think many men would want abortion to be legal too. Don't they get screwed too if they knock up a girl? I would have expected Irish women to be less feminist/career oriented, but maybe I'm wrong.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 01:42 PM
3

Do you live in the Republic of Ireland? How are things there women-wise? And feminism-wise? The stereotype going around is that yours is still a relatively 'patriarchal' country (you know, for first world standards).
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 02:00 AM
7

Yep. Historically speaking, the Irish gave the English one big giant FUCK YOU.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 01:58 AM
1

Never met a man REALLY good at tech who just put 'a couple of years' into it. Everything can be learned by anyone who has the sustained willpower to work hard at it for many years. The point is, you don't see huge amounts of women who are SO interested in tech they are willing to put in such an effort.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 08:03 PM
1

This was actually the point I was trying to make. I think all those foodie blogs and recipes actually turn people away from cooking. They make cooking look like something only chefs with a huge budget to spend on decorative ingredients alone can do. Nobody seems to understand cooking is actually supposed to be something normal people can do. Are there any 'normal' cooking books or online resources you would recommend?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 07:10 PM
1

It depends on how what you actually cook. You might get carried away and want to try that casserole, and that shepherd's pie recipe etc. and before you know it you are cooking unhealthy stuff daily.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 11:06 PM
-1

I believe the expression you were casting about for is actually 'tell-tale'. You're welcome.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 08:16 PM
0

Don't let anybody on this sub hear you utter the word 'crackers', you refined carb-eating traitor!
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 04:13 AM
-5

Trigger! We have a Trigglypuff among us. Well, that one lives to eat too...
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 03:37 AM
0

How to you cook the veggies? I have them sauteed with olive oil and add salt, pepper and even seeds or nuts to the mix. Takes 8 minutes and it looks like I've cooked some fancy vegetarian restaurant side dish.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 02:42 AM
24

Everyone gets told this. Women who don't want kids get crap because of it and called selfish. Men who don't marry get crap too, and called immature Peter Pans. It's just people making retarded assumptions about other people's life choices. Ignore them, lift, improve yourself, live your life.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 01:45 AM
2

True, but again I believe the actual changes it will bring to the vast majority of the population will be minimal.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 10:01 PM
2

I do not believe artificial uteruses will be given away for free either.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 08:54 PM
3

If a man wanted a child on his own, he could pay a surrogate uterus right now and get it. The point of marriage has always been more about creating a 'team' between two people committed to raising children together. I don't think this is such a shake-up in a practical sense.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 06:27 PM
0

One question: why this fear of grains? Quinoa is CHOCK FULL of protein. And millet is very healthy. Neither is a processed carb with a high sugar level. So why avoid them?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 05:56 PM
1

I don't get what the fuck these prenups are made for since they're the worth of toilet paper in a divorce court.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 10:25 PM
63

Well, you were lucky she actually DID leave you money for the steak. Many girls would have just walked straight home, trust me.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 06:36 PM
1

Ah well, that's annoying. I like smart women, actually, but not those who need to act superior at every turn (which is annoying in men, too).
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 02:51 PM
4

This is very strange though. If a girl is plain, she would not actually get objectified, because she does not get attention. So technically objectification is something that happens only to pretty girls?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 10:50 PM
0

LOL tell me more about this, this conversation sounds fun. What sort of RP philosophy did you distill to your twelve year old kid?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 10:48 PM
3

You don't go outside much, do you.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 10:44 PM
2

I'm just curious, in what way did she act all superior? You mean in a smartass 'I am a PHD Studen' way, or did she just make it clear to you she was not interested in seeing you again?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 06:02 PM
0

Well, I have just proven to you that a female psychologist had the growth mindset to study the whole theory. Your theory that women cannot have a growth mindset is bullshit. Be a man, stop needing to tell yourself you are 'genetically' superior to another gender (typical Fixed Mindset paranoia and desire to prove your worth) and get back to work. Improve yourself. P.S. And interesting aside is that Carol Dweck noticed that the female STEM students whom she coached into a growth mindset achieved …
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 01:44 PM
3

This is not a difference between genders. The whole process you described was actually studied by a female psychologist, Carol Dweck. She brought forward the theory of the Two Mindsets: the Fixed Mindset, and the Growth Mindset. She studied how people with a Fixed Mindset get discouraged by rejection because they constantly need to prove their worth. Everything they do must be good because if it is not, they feel like THEY are not good. Their self-esteem is constantly on the line. Everything the…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 05:43 AM
1

Men in nature would be a tad too busy killing each other to give a shit, actually.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/16 06:25 AM
1

But that was not a natural state of affairs. As you said, it was a social imposition. So women are not 'naturally' as you describe. They were merely bullied into submission (something which I do not advocate, by the way).
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 09:39 PM
1

This completely ignores female nature. Once she has children, she more often than not does not look up to her husband. She ignores him. How do you explain that?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 07:15 PM
1

Except I don't know about you, but in my neck of the woods if a woman loves her children more, there's going to be dead bedroom syndrome.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 06:40 PM
1

But doesn't the concept that women only love children actually end up harming a husband within a marriage? His wife won't pay attention to him.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 06:13 PM
1

Okay, so your idea of 'monogamy' (I think you need to find another word, because yours is more of an ideology) is what, women should only be servants because elevating them at the level of princesses undermines masculinity?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 05:55 PM
1

Disney undermines the family? The fuck man, every single princess gets married at the end of the movie.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 02:56 PM
1

Frankly all the blue pill Disney movies I have ever seen advocated monogamy... I think you are a bit confused.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 02:29 PM
2

You are not talking about nature. You are talking about historical social norms.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 04:24 AM
2

As I recall, this sub is pretty much about discussing how it is female nature to cheat. And if you have a girlfriend, aren't YOU breaking the natural laws of monogamy by fucking mine? You are trying to hamster the male instinctual preference for females with a low partner count into a claim that monogamy is natural, which is not. Keep hamstering away.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 04:52 PM
6

Hamster yourself into believing monogamy is natural all you like, it will make your hamster ready for the Olympics, but it won't change reality.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 04:31 PM
3

No, natural laws dictate that men impregnate as many women as possible and that women reject all unworthy men (and breed only with the top alpha). Hamster all you like, but that is the truth. That's what it was like in the caves.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 01:54 PM
3

She has to be willing to have a child with you outside of wedlock, though. Even if you impregnate her, she could still abort.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 12:57 PM
2

Well, monogamous patriarchy isn't natural either. The fact that half the men in this sub are still alive is not natural either (wouldn't have happened back in the caves).
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 12:54 PM
1

By this logic, though, every straight man on earth is a slave to women (which is kinda true, sexually speaking).
/r/TheRedPill07/09/16 10:33 PM
2

Replace her with an idiot who would do oral without receiving it in return, you mean.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/16 10:30 PM
3

LMAO looking for keyword red flags irl is actually an ingenious technique. But there aren't that many Red Pillers around.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/16 02:18 PM
2

What if she says she won't suck him off till he eats her? And what if she then says she won't do it till he focused and does it well? That would be fun. It'd destroy whatever little 'alpha' ego OP has.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 11:02 PM
7

The state of this OP. What is this TRP coming to? I hope you find a girl who tells you she won't give you oral before you give it to her, bro. That would be cockblockingly hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 11:00 PM
5

This sub in general is becoming batshit insane. Or at least... more insane than it used to be.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 10:58 PM
0

I did specify she has to be nice to him, but obviously if I am giving advice to her I am thinking about her benefit. An adoring beta will give her less hassle than an alpha who keeps her on edge and might dump her. Sure, the alpha is exciting, but I would advise her to play it safe if she wants to maximise her chances of success. A high-value man who does not want to think about her problems is a good fuck, not a good husband.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 05:38 AM
1

BUT I have to say this: I once dated a girl who liked to cook, but was really bad at it. She tried and tried, but she sucked for real. She literally burned stuff constantly, could not serve an omelette that was not broken into pieces etc., but she would always cook for me. I thought it was really cute that she tried to get better and wanted to learn. She did get better, actually, although her progress was VERY slow. I politely ate A LOT of semi-burnt dinners at her house. Sometimes the effort ma…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 04:48 AM
2

I was not talking in terms of what it is their instinct to do, but rather of what would rationally benefit them in the long term. And that's certainly not Asshole Cock treating them like crap, however many tingles he might give them.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 03:36 AM
11

I sense some butthurt jealousy here...
/r/TheRedPill06/09/16 12:40 AM
3

Sure, but the point is that the Chad sees this happen over and over again. That's what the Thousand Pussy Stare is, that feeling of hopelessness that comes after having seen too much of the very worst. A beta might get a shock if it happens to him once, but unless he is a wimp he will understand that nice women exist (once he recovers). But there is no recovery from the Thousand Pussy Stare.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 09:28 PM
1

But they don't want to be men, they want the good bits of equality. There are women who are genuinely invested in their careers, and would feel stifled if trapped at home. The point is that we always bring up stuff like men in the army getting blown up. They never actually cared about equality in that sense. In fact, a prominent feminist called Germaine Greer said feminism is more about female liberation than equality 'because want men currently have is not desirable'.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 07:02 PM
2

Perhaps this is just me, but what the fuck is the actual use of an 'active social life' in the long run? Friends come and go, that Chad does not give a shit about her. Family remains, instead. Why is it so hard to see the nice family-oriented guy is, ahem, actually nice for real?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 06:49 PM
2

Sorry, I just burst out laughing when I read: bossy, masculine, feminists, VEGANS. LOL. What I am trying to say is that feminists actually do behave like women. Our notion that women naturally want nothing more out of life other than taking care of us and our offspring is just man-hamstering we tell ourselves to feel better. Back when women were forced to marry, they often did not give a damn about their husband. It was merely that starting a family was their best survival option. But feminists …
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:50 PM
2

I would try to appeal to reason: an alpha is much less likely to be tolerant of her giving lots of her attention to her career. If she is a feminist career woman, and makes an effort to be satisfied with the nice guy (and makes an effort to be nice to him) it can work, I think. There are plenty of nice guys who are well-off financially, too. She gets her career, a house, her husband's income and adoration, and if she has a child it'll be well-provided for. Is that Chad cock really worth sacrific…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:42 PM
4

It's a very dark topic, I completely see how a black guy can be hurt by this. I think the Asian girls who do this are of the 'ambitious' kind (they are obviously not all like that), meaning that they want a white man just because of the status associated with it and perhaps they themselves are afraid they will experience racism and be used by a guy who is eventually going to marry a white woman. So perhaps these girls interpret a black guy's interest as an offense, like he is saying 'white peopl…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:38 PM
4

Guys, this is just hamstering. Women in the west or wherever else are still women. Non-Western women are simply too deprived and focused on survival to have time to think about Alpha Fucks. But they still don't love the BB for who he is, but for his resources. They would still go for Alpha Fucks if they could support themselves instead like Western women. I always find it kinda depressing how so many men, once they get to stare into the abyss, do not believe what they see and just need to tell t…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:10 PM
14

Personally, I do think there is such a thing as the thousand pussy stare. It happens mainly because a Chad gets to see the worst of female nature. Imagine getting sucked off by a woman who has been proposed by the nice guy two hours ago. Seeing Hypergamy Unleashed with your own eyes makes it impossible for you to trust the opposite sex. It damages your ability to recognise a nice girl even if you met one.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:00 PM
10

If a woman asked me for advice on getting married, my advice would be: find someone who adores you more than you adore him. The nice guy is the one who will do anything for her, buy her a house etc., and even a plain jane (who takes care of herself) can get a nice guy in her youth. The problem is that women keep going for Chad over and over again, and he just uses them. They actually do not like to be chased as much as they like to chase.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 03:53 PM
2

Feminism was enabled by technological progress which made housework redundant, but it was started and carried on by women. Difficult to see how it does not reflect their wishes.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 03:35 PM
7

If we want to be brutally honest, we would have to admit that we Red Pillers are not adapting fully successfully to the new environment. We humans are wired to evolve and adapt, but we do so very slowly. For instance, nowadays it makes zero sense for women to be attracted to muscular thugs. It would be more beneficial for them to go after the nerdy kid who will one day patent something and become a millionaire. But she is still following the 'cave' instinct which tells her to go for the alpha ma…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:46 AM
5

It all depends on whether she's in AF mode or BB mode. In AF mode what she wants is the orgasm, in BB mode she wants validation because it means BB is going to stick around.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:35 AM
6

I mean, the whole monogamous system was delusional man-hamstering to a certain extent. Women gravitated towards the alphas and then gave most of their attention to their children and did not give a shit about all the men who died out in the woods. As the agrarian system was developed and men needed and incentive to work, each was given a woman to procreate with. The hamstering was thinking that if a woman was given the incentive of resources only for herself, she would be kind towards her husban…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:27 AM
3

This whole method only works, as you said, if the other person has no leverage over you (kids, divorce etc.) and if feelings are not involved. As I said, we humans are wired to want to bond after trauma. If the only person bonding with us after a trauma is the abuser who gave us the trauma in the first place, that is who we will bond with. Voila, Stockholm Syndrome. You need to keep a degree of detachment for your plan to work, and in family relationships that is not often possible. It is not ev…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:14 AM
8

Because it benefits her to keep them dependent on her affection. It is highly Machiavellian to use the carrot and stick approach. If the kids like the carrot and learn it only comes after they take the stick, they'll take it. That way her mental control over them (and possibly the husband) is complete. Obviously not all women are this dark triad, but the thing is, once you remove oxytocin, which keeps them bonded to others and emotional, they have an innate capacity to manipulate.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:08 AM
6

Do not make the mistake of thinking it is not all calculated...
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:53 AM
8

All the fairy tales with an evil stepmother speak of this. There is no value in a daughter that isn't her own and will compete with hers, so she won't be kind and nurturing towards her. Yet the king married her because he wanted a nurturing presence after his wife died and she seemed like it, with him. With him only, because that benefits her. Being nurturing to his daughter does not. I think we make a mistake when we say nowadays women behave 'unnaturally'. They are as close to their natural st…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:51 AM
4

She wants them for their resources and for general validation, though. If she met a man she is genuinely attracted to she would touch herself day and night thinking of him.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:44 AM
11

What I was referring to was a more psychological factor. Women are not always nurturing in the sense that they want to spend their lives cleaning and cooking for a husband who provides. If that was female nature, feminism would not have happened and this sub would not exist. It was a social imposition that forced women to do that, but obviously we are fools if we think it is 'natural' for a woman to want to selflessly dedicate her life to her husband.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 04:37 AM
45

The difference is that women are selective. So if there are fifty boys in college, she will want to sleep only with the top two ones. If she can't get sex from them, she'd rather masturbate. Men are seen as more promiscuous merely because they have lower standards and would fuck just about anything with tits. But the idea of women not having a sex drive is ludicrous, and makes zero sense from an evolutionary point of view.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 12:25 AM
40

That's how Stockholm Syndrome is developed. We humans are hardwired to bond after trauma. If we are traumatised by our wife/mother, and then she acts sweet again and we bond with her right after, we'll end up forgetting she's the one who gave us the trauma in the first place and seeing her as a healer. That is how sociopaths keep their victims in check, actually.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 11:32 PM
34

The point is, to many women this does not come naturally. It never did, actually. The social regulations which were in place in the past, such as keeping women out of the workforce, were put there so that women would have no choice but to fake a pleasant behaviour in order to survive aka marry and secure resources. But I think we men are fools if we think it is in a woman's nature to always act like that.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 11:28 PM
7

Obviously many, myself included, do not agree with you on that (and I'm not advocating for her to be your actual mother). If I try to think in your terms, though, my point still stands. What does a master want from a servant? Loyalty, and devotion. How does she express that devotion? By wanting to serve you. And she'll do that by taking care of you. Same result.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 11:17 PM
7

Yes, perhaps that is a more appropriate term. It actually also touches on the masculine desire to feel needed, which is a great source of validation. Here men often talk about how a woman wants a higher status man in a sort of bitchy, resentful way, but actually men get validation out of being needed (by being of a high status) by a woman. So a man wants validation from his wife displayed in two ways: her being willing to take care of him, and her needing him.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 11:10 PM
11

Of course it is a bad idea, and the reason you know it is is because the woman in question is not likely to be nurturing.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 10:44 PM
13

This is why I stressed the difference between 'creepy mothering' and nurturing. You don't want her to control you like a baby boy, but the kind of support you want from her is of a nurturing type. You don't need it, as in you wouldn't be able to tie your shoes on your own, but you like that she wants to nurture you. What other kind of energy would you want from her, after all? A punch on the arm and a 'I've got your back, Captain' attitude?
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 10:39 PM
12

This is not how a well-adjusted man is like. This is how a man who's scared shitless of getting hurt by a woman is like. Of course you know how to take care of yourself, but you like that she is there and wants to care for you. That's the difference between nurturing and downright creepy mothering. I'm talking about how a functional relationship ought to be like. If all you really wanted was sex and kids, basic biological needs, you could have those from any CC rider.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 10:24 PM
6

What is referred as 'beta' here is a normal component of male nature which, if present in excess, leads to problems. But inside every man there is a beta, and some beta traits will emerge when you are in a LTR. Always.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 10:08 PM
2

How do you deal with the adopted girls? Is it more of a problem for them not to have a female role model around?
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 08:16 PM
0

What you need to do to lose weight is not to eat less, but to eat a lot of the right things. Don't limit your portions of vegetables etc., that's useless starving. You are spot on about proteins being important, but people nowadays are carb-phobic and don't get that the right kind of whole grains are very beneficial to the body. Quinoa, oats etc. are great for you (quinoa is also a great source of protein), a fact that is often ignored in favour of protein-worshipping. Honestly, I'd like to know…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 06:27 AM
28

Motivation doesn't last. Perseverance and discipline do. You won't have the 'inspired motivation' to jump out of bed every morning. Period. What you can have, though, is the calm discipline and perseverance that makes you quietly slip out of bed every morning and carefully begin to put your clothes on. Day in and day out. Automatically. 'Motivation' is an exciting feeling. It's a sprint-like feeling. Life is a marathon, not a sprint. It's like those people who decide they are going to 'work real…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 06:16 AM
19

I dislike the general trashiness you can find around here. Like how men in their 40s seem proud that their lives revolve around 'spinning plates' and think starting a family is just for cucks etc. I don't personally look at these men with admiration. The other thing I don't like is the general extremist 'women are crap in every field and should be forced back in the kitchen' attitude. And it comes from men whom I'm prepared to bet haven't got much to offer in a LTR/marriage anyway.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/16 01:39 AM
2

Some men can wear long hair without looking effeminate too, but many cannot. Same goes for women. The general rule is that short hair makes them look masculine, although some manage to still look pixie-like and feminine. As a general rule, when we say we do not like short hair, we mean we do not like a masculine look. It is not a fool-proof rule that women will look masculine with short hair, but often they do.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 09:13 PM
1

Pffft I doubt she's the type who would sleep with a man before knowing his credit score. Chick is ugly, but seems smart as hell.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/16 10:07 AM
6

There are 9 fucking billions of us cockroaches on this earth. If anything, I advise you to wear a condom and not knock the bitch up.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 03:56 AM
7

Are you projecting? What did your woman do to you? Did she leave you for Chad Thundercock, and now you're crying your eyes out at night and hoping some big vengeful apocalypse will happen that will guarantee you free enslaved pussy because that's the only way you're ever going to get some? Grow the fuck up, dude. Get some self-respect. Go learn how to be a man, not a little bitch who whines because hypergamy is too mean and doesn't give him any toys to play with.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 03:25 AM
17

Men get laid all the time in this hypergamous society, mate. Honestly, if I had to resort to enslave women to make them have sex with me, I would feel like such a worthless omega it'd take all the fun out of the conquest. Like it or not, we men are built to want to fight each other (in the corporate ladder, these days) to attract the best women. That bullshit about enslaving women to make them have sex with us all to end male-on-male competition and focus on 'creativity' is like asking for free …
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 01:12 AM
58

Guys, this kind of shit is the reason why feminism happened in the first place. I have been burned by female hypergamy myself, but you cannot treat half the world's population like cattle to be sold for your pleasure. Humans are still humans after all. I'm not against women having freedom, I am for improving ourselves to be in the top 20% and get the quality girls. That's all. And if you want to tell me quality girls don't exist, I suggest you get off your lazy ass, go lift and go out more, than…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 10:45 PM
1

The problem is hypergamy. Women are repulsed by most men, so they equate a traditional patriarchal society with slavery because to them being forced to marry a disgusting creature to acquire resources to survive is tantamount to rape. I can see their pov, if you understand hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 08:13 PM
2

Which in turn makes feminists think femininity belittles women, which in turn makes women despise femininity, which in turn makes men dislike modern women. There's no way out.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 07:31 PM
9

In 50 years most men will do all their own chores in their shared houses with their bros. Alphas won't do any though, because those will be taken care of by the harem of women they will live with. We are just heading towards a return to the natural, ancestral, caveman lifestyle. Just let natural biology triumph, guys.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 05:23 PM
9

Those who claim that women are worthless apart from their reproductive abilities are in the anger phase. I am glad for Marie Curie, J. K. Rowling etc., and whoever thinks women are just stupid and incapable of anything but rearing children is blind to reality. But the point is, for centuries a man's purpose in life has been to provide for his family. Nowadays women have careers and are not dependent on their husbands for survival. This means they often just downright forget their husband even ex…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 04:01 PM
2

The point is, 'strong' is a word that I think has completely lost meaning in our vocabulary. If a girl has her shit together, sticks to a fitness regime and is disciplined and works hard (all good things, who wants a fat lazy slob?), she will describe herself as 'strong'. The right adjectives would be disciplined, controlled, organised etc. That is why I make the ballerina example. Who's more disciplined and hard-working and has her shit together more than a ballerina, who goes through all that …
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 01:57 PM
11

Well RP men vary in their views. I am fine with women having the right to own property, get a job etc. and I suppose what feminists see is only the truly extreme guys who want women to be just their whores/housewives and have zero human rights. I am merely advocating for femininity. I don't see why a modern woman who has her freedoms cannot be feminine (which is what the SJWs are pushing). Like okay, imagine that a woman wants to be a painter. Great, nowadays she can access art school! The femin…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 02:23 AM
17

Guys, we men cheat too. Heck, I cheated on my ex gf. We humans in general are not biologically programmed for monogamy.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 01:50 AM
1

If your girlfriend has not left you yet, she's a fucking idiot. And if your son does not tell his teacher about this one day, he's a fucking idiot too (although more understandable, seeing how young he is). I never said I thought beating was right. I just highlighted why it does not actually change a person's nature.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 01:34 AM
5

Well I made the ballerina example because ballerinas are pretty strong. Strength and femininity are not opposites, it depends on what kind of strength we are talking about. In general 'strong' has become a diluted term which actually refers to qualities such as discipline, work ethic etc. again, all things a very feminine woman actually can have, and that many modern women do NOT have.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 01:32 AM
5

Exactly. And I think not having a mother like that also screws your judgement later in life. ALL his girlfriends were crazy bitches. He was not a beta and held frame, mind, but man he was not good at picking mother material.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 10:09 PM
7

Having a total bitch of a mother did not help that kid. The stereotype is that boys raised by single mothers grow up to be spineless betas. He did not. He grew up trying to live up to his mother's standard of manhood, and look what a fuck up he grew up to be.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 09:44 PM
2

Education does not help boys these days, but there are other factors. For instance, I do FIRMLY believe that not having a proper motherly figure fucks boys up in the head. I think it affects boys more than girls. I have a friend who has been in jail for knife attack, and he has been raised by a single mother. Contrary to the popular belief, she did not 'feminise' him. He told me she was an alcoholic and would keep repeating him how much he looked 'just like his father' (Alpha Widow pining over t…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 09:00 PM
6

I always think this: throughout the ages, there have been a lot of female writers, but no many female mathematicians. Yet a woman who had access to her father's library could pick up a maths book and work on theorems rather than novels, just as easily. Could it be because women have language and social skills which they have developed to help them raise children throughout the ages and so they are better at language and interpersonal relationships? No. You see, the Bronte sisters were novelists …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 06:53 PM
6

Yes, I think you nailed it, it's looking for a motherly/fatherly figure. The blue-pill bullshit is different. It teaches men to basically seek a buddy who happens to have a vagina. It completely ignores gender dynamics. Or alternatively it teaches them to be supplicating betas. But for instance, back in the Middle Ages knights needed to be kept in check lest they got so bored they went around robbing and raping. The perfect way to do this? Invent courteous love. Make them serve the lady. Why did…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 06:25 PM
14

Speaking of why there are strains in relationships today, the problem of feminism is that it pushes this 'need no man' idea on girls. If you think about it, men have always needed women. They have never pretended otherwise. They work their whole lives to support their families and they do want to go home to a supportive wife, they do want her to be loyal to him. A woman having a career is not a problem. Despite what is often thrown around here, I do know a couple in which she outearns him. My si…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 05:14 PM
2

Thank you for this OP. I too have noticed that the calmer and the more in control you are of your breathing,I work better because I am more in control of what I am doing. The problem is at a certain point I enter a sort of autopilot stage (meditation also does this to me) and I have trouble focusing on what I am doing.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 02:57 PM
93

The thing is, femininity is not really JUST about looks. Even a homely plain jane (who takes care of herself) can be extremely feminine. The problem is, I think girls nowadays equate femininity with silliness or downright stupidity. Being feminine does not mean being an idiot. Funnily enough, in order to be feminine a woman also needs to work on herself and needs discipline. Nowadays many women claim that they work hard and are strong and independent, but actually they are not because they lack …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 02:40 PM
1

Which is also why it's not a bad for a man to be openly sociopathic. It helps him build respect. What makes no sense to me on an evolutionary level is why an alpha sociopath would look for similar sociopathic traits in a woman rather than going for a nurturing type. And yet in real life male sociopaths do indeed seem to pair up with female counterparts (see murderer couples). This is a mystery I haven't unraveled yet. In your hunter gatherer society, such a pair would not benefit the community. …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 04:48 AM
2

He would have a fucking harem. Women are attracted to sociopaths, there's no way around it. But again my theory about feminist eugenics is proven. I immediately thought of the Joker because the other day I read a tumblr feminist convo about how Harley is actually 'strong and independent', aka a crazy bitch. Feminists want to be aggressive and bitchy, because who are the only men who can handle women like that? Sociopaths. See? Acting like a strong independent feminist is all about screening the …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 01:30 AM
1

The point is, it all works in their favor. Within a globalised economy, we need a bigger workforce. That means you can't force women back out of work. In countries like China you need a huge workforce AND to keep the population under control. So again, the old family structure makes zero sense. Whoever genuinely thinks the old days will come back is a delusional moron.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 01:20 AM
6

Not that beating them turned them into unicorns. This is the hard part to swallow when it comes to the red pill. Beating your wife back then would make her fear you, would make her resent you, but would never turn her into the unicorn who adores you. And if you don't give a shit about unicorns and don't think deep down men want one, you are still in denial and in the anger phase.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 12:05 AM
2

I have come to the realisation that there has to be a reason why feminists want to be 'strong and independent' yet still expect their man to be alpha. It's one giant shit test, basically. You have to be really tough to handle a bitch and hold frame. That's their eugenics selection method. Being a bitch to you is about testing to see if you lose frame. If you do, bam. They've smelled weakness. You are a beta. They want an alpha who is so alpha he can dominate a crazy bitch, that's all. It's about…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 11:55 PM
1

And if you can't pull it off, there is always the Joker. He played bad asshole game with Harley alright. Although of course the problem with being an asshole is that you tend to attract the most emotionally unstable girls...
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 11:45 PM
1

How the fuck does this invalidate anything I have said? The honourable good guy is still inferior to the bad guy, I have specified that. The more dark triad you are, the more ruthless (and therefore stronger) you are. I'm only saying that a dark triad type cannot be locked down by ANY woman because after you get your cock sucked by a girl who's been proposed half an hour before by her honourable beta boyfriend, you just don't trust women anymore. You have seen the worst of female hypergamy. You'…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 11:34 PM
0

Women are attracted to strength. That's all. The bad guy, being the most ruthless of the lot, comes off as the strongest. Then you have the Tough Good Guy (strong yet tamed by morals) and lastly you have the betas/doormats. The reason why women actually stick with the bad boy long term is that they think they can change him. They can't fucking change him because the bad boy is the male equivalent of a slut. He has seen too much. He is too jaded. He will never let himself go enough to trust a wom…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 11:09 PM
1

You know what pisses me off? That girls love the Bad Boys, and deep down they all hope to lock one down by showing him that they are not like all the others. That they are good, loyal etc. That is how you get to have good girls who throw themselves all over assholes. It's the Beauty and the Beast stereotype. I mean shit, they don't get that Bad Boys (yeah, even the ones lurking here) are fucking damaged. They're not different from sluts in that sense. They have seen disgusting shit, they have se…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 10:34 PM
5

You know, this kinda confirms what I think about us RP men. Sure, we like the free sex we can get through sexual strategies, but it's not what we WANT deep down. Even most people here who don't want kids cite reasons such as the shitty divorce laws etc. Deep down I think we are all just so jaded because we haven't got the good, faithful housewife to go home to. I think if we're honest with ourselves, we all want that.
/r/askTRP22/08/16 03:49 AM
1

Yup. My view too. The pill hurt, but it was worth it.
/r/askTRP22/08/16 02:53 AM
1

The suffragettes were not that conformist though, and they were not very backed up. They were treated like criminals. Hey I'm not saying the current anti-male system works, it sucks in many aspects. Divorce rape is brutal. I know all this. But your description kinda makes people understand why first and second wave feminism (not third, fuck that shit) worked. Humans do not like being beaten and oppressed, that's sort of universal.
/r/askTRP22/08/16 02:35 AM
1

Yeah, you're probably right. Thought about this myself. Just not worth it trying to muddle the lines between work and private life.
/r/askTRP17/08/16 02:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter