TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CrawstonWaffle Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by CrawstonWaffle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Video Games are a tough subject. They're just enough of a grey area to comment on. I'll leave out any argument of "pro" video games as those are still an extreme minority of actual video game players regardless of their growing popularity as a spectator event. On one hand, you're 100% right. 99.99% of Video Games aren't going to teach you how to prepare a meal, survive in the wild, or be charming beyond maybe some incidental trivia hidden in flavor text or dialogue. There really isn't a "point" …
/r/seduction07/03/15 03:13 AM
13

Sometimes the heart loves who it loves. Hell truly deep love occurs when you love someone with or because of their damage-- and we've all got some damage, no one in this world is clean. You're insecure about something too, and I don't really care what it is. Even if you're just a girl's friend--even for very selfish reasons like you want to keep her around for easier access to her friends--being a firm, healthy, and enriching masculine presence in her life is just being a decent human being. We'…
/r/seduction30/01/15 04:17 AM
1

Latino literally means "of Latin America." Hispanic meanwhlie, means "from Spain." A lot of Latinos fail to make this distinction as well, so don't sweat it, but hey now you know.
/r/seduction21/12/14 11:50 PM
1

Confidence is just a misapporpriated way to say "calibrate all your subtle expressions properly." Believing in yourself is a part of this process, but to say it is the only aspect is disingenuous as all get out. Sometimes things are in fact complex for people and that's ok. KISS is not the be all end all for getting someone success, although it is good general wisdom to remember. The fact that you're so patronizingly reductive tells me you're pretty naturally talented and/or lucky.
/r/seduction19/08/14 03:52 PM
2

Seriously. I'd say that out of the top 10 richest people I've personally known the bottom 5 were not conventionally good-looking at all. The top 5 of those 10 however looked like goddamn Elves among the Dwarves.
/r/seduction19/08/14 03:47 PM
1

It's funny how defensive people here are getting with the downvotes. I was being sarcastic because I know damn well that there are many legitimately wonderful people in the PUA community, yet this guy embodies the worst stereotype I've heard of from other people.
/r/seduction07/06/12 04:02 PM
0

Well that doesn't play into the stereotype that Puas are Frat boy graduates milking money from nerds by playing into their insecurity with women AT ALL.
/r/seduction07/06/12 02:58 PM
4

Tell them you were linked to it and wanted to dare what it had to offer. Anyone who gives you shit is an uneducated tool whose opinion is only worth their value as a tool.
/r/seduction05/02/12 05:04 PM
2

As a somewhat short guy myself (5' 7"), it seems to be all about attitude, posture, and body language. Doesn't really matter how tall or short you are, though the approaches naturally differ. A taller guy can more easily play the "I'm big and will make your animal brain feel safer" role in how he touches, while a shorter guy can play the "I'm fun and unpredictable" touch game without being as jarring or immediately threatening. And of course the reversals are also possible. If a tall guy feels c…
/r/seduction15/11/11 04:18 PM
1

Well yeah, but did you read the article? It definitely isn't about being a deliberate creep. It's a pretty standard "quit worrying about being called a creep. If you are, what's the worst that's going to happen?" affirmation.
/r/seduction11/11/11 07:17 PM
6

Fact is that unless you truly are the best of the best of the best, you're going to cock up at least once or twice and word will get around. You can either own that or let it own you.
/r/seduction11/11/11 04:28 PM
3

Thanks, I needed to see this post this morning.
/r/seduction10/11/11 02:00 PM
1

As someone in a similar condition, you need to find as many options outside of your house as possible. Use and even abuse the hospitality of others--sympathetic friends, the girl's place, whatever. When that fails and your place is the best option... Your house needs to become a place for certain girls. Girls you can talk with and explain the situation, who are then cool with this temporary limitation of your style and environment. A potential problem with this is that then the girl becomes some…
/r/seduction07/11/11 02:53 AM
9

You'll start to notice a bit of difference between the pains of discipline--that is controlling, mitigating, and even eradicating negative feelings--and repression, which constitutes pretending the feelings simply aren't there. A common phrase I've seen on here is "acknowledge, and move on." That's the simplest way to put the methodology to deal with negative feelings, but it's really reductive in its phrasing. The best things I've found thus far--and for the record I'm not authority or have had…
/r/seduction08/10/11 02:03 PM
12

I'm not a success story, but I'm a work in progress. I've lost around 25lbs. in 2 months, started a new school and am doing fairly well all things considered, am forcing myself into new situations, and while it's (edit: definitely) a lost cause I've found a wonderful and crazy girl online who helped light a fire under my ass and remind me that fun is still out there to be had. The best advice I've found after about 8 years of false starts and squandered opportunity before finally starting a trac…
/r/seduction01/10/11 11:31 PM
2

Was he a Smalley?
/r/seduction28/09/11 08:49 PM
11

They exist. They're predominantly forms of hentai.
/r/seduction28/09/11 08:47 PM
3

If she is complaining about something, don't validate it. Over time, she'll see you as weak, and not much more than a bitch buddy. Don't be afraid to call her out.. She may respond negatively to you, but her respect and interest will go up. Don't let her engage in an argument over it, because it's pedantic. This goes for complaints about work, social expectations, family problems, etc. Essentially, if it's a first world problem, call her out on it. Thanks for this. I needed to remember this. Bee…
/r/seduction28/09/11 05:18 AM
2

Hypergamy-- look it up. Much as I hate to say it that seems to be the default mindset of any woman vaguely aware of her sexual worth. It's hardly exclusive to women--I know men and have even been a man willing to "trade up" with partners (not proud of this), but regardless of gender it is a concept worth becoming familiar with.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 10:32 PM
5

There's a hypocrisy in that the very egotists like Hugo are the very traditional "alpha" men that women biologically crave. I've met some women who acknowledge this distinction. Much as I hate it as I am short, weak, and generally the kind-of guy that'd be a 'prison bitch', I also accept it as an unfortunate reality of preference--in the same vein that I'm allowed to discriminate women based on their looks because even though I know there's something kind-of fucked about saying "No fat chicks"..…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 03:38 AM
4

You have the mind of a diplomat and the methods of a man. I salute you and appreciate your coaching on how to deal with this situation from both ends.
/r/seduction08/07/11 06:28 AM
2

True, but I think the words he was looking for were "childish, creepy, mildly obsessive."
/r/seduction05/07/11 06:01 PM
1

Sounds like a rationalization for being cheap, to be honest, even though I don't think you're wrong about anything you've said.
/r/seduction05/07/11 05:59 PM
93

Are they mutually exclusive?
/r/seduction05/07/11 08:44 AM
13

I am a man of authentic self-esteem. I am no better than anyone else. Well said man! These two are perhaps even more important than the rest because for every time the pendulum shifts away from self-depreciation and self-loathing it carries the momentum towards egoistic arrogance and overconfidence.
/r/seduction05/06/11 07:36 PM
1

The vast majority of the really major advances in modern medicine, makeup, and hygiene are 3 centuries old at most, which is hardly enough time for it to affect the gene pool that radically. Another observation would be that all of those things allowed people who otherwise wouldn't be socially fit enough to survive and breed have--though that also doesn't necessarily mean we're worse humans for it due to the randomized nature of our potential offspring.
/r/seduction03/05/11 12:11 AM
3

What was the nastiest reaction you've received thus far? Any times where you started to receive IOI and proceeded to stumble or otherwise lose her interest?
/r/seduction12/05/10 04:29 AM
1

Yeah I thought this was standard woman procedure. I'm not knocking it, but if it's not then I really need to get a move on.
/r/seduction21/03/10 06:20 AM
1

Good documentary, although like all discussions on penis size it pretends girth doesn't exist and it's all about length.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:48 AM
1

It goes man to man in domestic situations too. My stepfather was ranting to me the other day about dishes in the sink and my car in his driveway (only parked there because when I arrived a nearby school was letting out and all street spots were used), and I was silently letting him rant until he started to get explosive and confrontational. "MOVE THE FUCKING CAR" he's yelling. "Ok," I tell him, "I only parked it there because..." "I DON'T CARE FUCKING MOVE IT." "Don't be an asshole." "I DON'T FU…
/r/MensRights19/02/10 07:41 AM
1

No, I did my homework with other people that knew her and found out she at the very least wasn't shooting me down that badly. I'm trying to build a connection because I'm not looking to club her over the head and drag her home for sex and fresh deer carcasses to keep her safe during the warm months. I'm also not trying to build us up to the level where I can side-step all the dating and just propose to her, but you see that I'm not looking to pick-up solely for the sake of picking up a woman. Wh…
/r/seduction15/01/10 12:06 AM
2

Well this is the exact opposite of what I wanted to read about today. Now the next time I contemplate trying to sleep with a woman all I'll be thinking about is what her real motive is instead of just trying to enjoy the experience. I'd hate to be one of those pity fucks or some kind-of self-esteem fuck.
/r/seduction13/01/10 08:20 PM
2

This is a very good article. I really needed to see this today. My biggest problem is escalating. Part of this is being uncomfortable with pursuing a woman (I don't have great predatory instincts, at least not with women. I'm of the variety that I should build a connection before even trying to 'claim' her but modern dating seems to want to work the opposite way with women giving me signals to escalate.) and part of it is being afraid of putting myself out there after being bitten for being forw…
/r/seduction10/01/10 04:25 AM
5

3 Times a Week, 20 minutes of Cardio after you've started sweating. This is literally my anti-depressant. You will be fucking astonished at how good it makes you feel and every single side effect is a positive: *Better heart *Better blood pressure *Better cholesterol *Better co-ordination *Better energy *Better musculature *Less Fat *More Goals *More natural chemicals in your brain to counter-act the negative ones, which regardless of your cold hard depression-induced logic, DO make a huge diffe…
/r/seduction10/01/10 04:17 AM
11

I appreciate your frank candor but seriously unclench when it comes to women. Not all women are inherently evil and regardless of how easy it is to believe you need to be open to the possibility of good for there to be any actual change. Even the most ardent feminists realized that if they didn't at least recognize the capacity for good in the men of the world they were never going to get anywhere championing equal rights; they were just going to be seen as a bunch of zealots alienating the very…
/r/MensRights24/10/09 03:41 PM
0

Edit: fucking syntax. I know there's something wrong with the number values on the list. I didn't write them that way. When you put numbers and don't have the entire entry in one paragraph, followed by the next number value on the next line, reddit will make every number the start of a new list. I have to go to work so I'm not going to fix this, but please curtail being clever by pointing out that "Hey, it's all 1!" Attempting to make a man "fit" to her idea of Prince Charming. If there's one in…
/r/MensRights24/10/09 03:33 PM
8

Edit: fucking syntax. I know there's something wrong with the number values on the list. I didn't write them that way. When you put numbers and don't have the entire entry in one paragraph, followed by the next number value on the next line, reddit will make every number the start of a new list. I have to go to work so I'm not going to fix this, but please curtail being clever by pointing out that "Hey, it's all 1!" This article was written by a young 20-something upper-middle class know-nothing…
/r/MensRights24/10/09 03:32 PM
11

Almost all of us really, really love sex- using it as a weapon is just fucking dumb. Why associate it with punishment rather than pleasure? I actually heard a point/counterpoint argument on a college radio station recently that dealt with why women tend to end up being the 'gatekeepers' when it comes to sex. Aside from anatomical puns, Ghostbuster references, and anthropological hunter vs. nurturer dynamics it has to do with the fact that women in general are barraged with offers for sex after t…
/r/MensRights26/08/09 09:42 PM
1

xx and xy are one of the few true cases of "separate but equal" because without the other (regardless of any constructed gender roles you apply) neither can properly function per their biological imperatives. And I'm not just talking about procreation either.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 09:27 PM
1

I've been on and off every SSRI and they all can be quite rough, but you are right about Paxil. I wasn't on effexor though. As for opiate-related depression that chemical reaction is logically somewhat similar to that of ending antidepressants: remove the high (with antidepressants the high is much more moderate as the dosage and chemical alternation is comparatively low) and the low seems that much worse. i.e: Meth and cocaine are like horrible roller coaster rides you go on blindfolded, and ar…
/r/MensRights01/08/09 01:57 AM
3

As a former pill-popper who tried and failed to see the pharmaceutical-sanctioned light I have to say the intensity of depression when you get off your medication, even for a short while, is unbelievable. I'd imagine those prone to suicide taking a break from their medication for the first time, unprepared, are huge risks for self-injury.
/r/MensRights01/08/09 01:10 AM
0

It's the circle of liiiiiiiiiifeeeeeeee
/r/MensRights26/07/09 03:14 AM
7

Although as a qualifier this is not a certainty. For all we really know she may be virtuous and noble enough to consider such a practice abhorrent in the highest degree. However desperation can produce desperate measures and if nothing else you should safeguard against such a despicable and unethical possibility.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 01:17 PM
1

Yup, funny how that works. The saddest part is that duhhhh's obvious point will go largely unrecognized so most readers for/against won't even realize what they're doing.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:42 PM
-2

Not to demean legitimate suffering but it really is moments like this that make me worried about hormonal shifting in the general male spectrum, blurring the gender line ever so precariously.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:38 AM
4

This post is true. Phil Hartman, while it is hard to argue was specifically denied care as a battered man, did showcase many hallmarks of one and arguably would have benefited from a support program. Bryce Hartman had a history of mental troubles and drug abuse, and was off the wagon when she took Phil and herself out. Her troubles were myriad and Phil needed more than refuge. It is such a catch-22. Because of primal gender roles men are hardwired in society to believe they are never to be threa…
/r/MensRights27/04/09 06:30 PM
1

and it should only be a last resort. Dirty pool, like tongue-biting, makes forced restraint acceptable, and striking to the point of injury necessitates self-defense.
/r/MensRights16/04/09 02:22 AM
1

That doesn't mean it doesn't speak to general gender injustice. Only a fool would advocate rights for one group and ignore the mistreatment of others.
/r/MensRights16/04/09 02:20 AM
1

There's also the notion of being so infertile as to be unable to accurately know one's own sexuality. There's also the sad, but still prevalent notion of homosexuality as something bad.
/r/MensRights28/03/09 05:55 PM
3

That is why there need to be legal penalties instituted. I am wondering how anonymity in a rape case would work, given the semi-public nature of the court and the fact that if you know a few of the people involved it's not a Holmes-level mystery of deducing who the accused is, but I don't know the legal system very well so it may be wholly possible. If it is I would propose instituting a general anonymity statement on both the plaintiff and the accused, and bar all but minimal reliable witnesses…
/r/MensRights27/02/09 06:09 PM
5

He's right. Shouting, whining, and being accusatory solves nothing in the long run. Be loud if you have to, but don't be a boor; be an adult. Nobody likes that guy or gal whose ego makes them believe they're crusaders in the march against tyranny and every speech is the real life version of a Hollywood equal-rights-crusader flick. That guy or gal almost always takes the angry and frightened and whips them into using blunt force to try and achieve their ends and winds up looking like a radical nu…
/r/MensRights27/02/09 05:48 PM
6

Well that's childish and really sucks. "the school officials sent out a letter and an automated voice mail about a "crime" that had been reported against a juvenile. This, presumably, refers to the alleged rape. After it was determined there was no rape and that the only crime was the girl's false report, did the school officials send out another letter and automated voice mail to parents about that? Somehow, I highly doubt it. Boys, you see, don't need to be protected from the girls who would d…
/r/MensRights27/02/09 05:21 PM
1

That is a Pyrrhic Victory if there ever was one man.
/r/MensRights18/02/09 04:52 AM
1

Yes, it's the word faggot and all that it implies. Where the fuck do you come from where using that word to refer to homosexuals is kosher in public decorum? If you're in private and the audience makes it known that use of the word is ok-which may not be a place I would want to be--then go right on ahead but this is supposed to be a place where men of any stripe, color, and creed can come to support the advancement of our gender what would possibly be gained by using a derogatory and exclusionar…
/r/MensRights17/02/09 12:39 AM
1

WOW That is SO not the point I was making! My gay brother and I would like to tell you to go fuck yourself with a rubber hose and have acetone enema, but the chemistry budget was so low we'll just have to settle for a bodybuilding burly bear named Clyde to fuck you instead.
/r/MensRights16/02/09 08:08 PM
12

Holy shit the chemistry club only gets $400-600 a year? That's the real crime here. Don't get me wrong though, I do think it's a stupid-ass double standard that showcases a cultural bias to see men as an oppressive majority more concerned with being jackasses with their buddies than organizing and helping out in the same way a Women's Club does. And I'll guarantee you there's a lot of the same type of horseplay in the Women's Club too.
/r/MensRights16/02/09 02:40 AM
1

Guys don't always get along as much as "tolerate." They're far less likely to peer bash outside of a pariah/weak link in the team situation, but rarely go as far as bond with other members of their peer groups in the ways girls do. Girls, by contrast, can develop complex and intimate social relationships very fast and easily by comparison. Really, while I appreciate the scientific merit of conducting a formal survey, anyone who has seen girls socializing over the age of five could have told you …
/r/MensRights16/02/09 12:09 AM
1

Oh Heavens no. No Blue? How will we EVER know which gender it's biased towards? By reading it? Fuck that, we're Americans, we don't need to read! Either that's a mediocre fake or you are really stupid.
/r/MensRights06/02/09 01:16 AM
-2

Yes, boys are always meant to carry the burden on their own. Isn't that one of the things the more even-handed poster states? This poster is definitely skewed towards bashing women by a boy who didn't quite understand the even-handed nature of the original poster, but that doesn't mean there aren't points. If anything this deserves a more girl-oriented one to compensate. Then we have both poles and the middle ground.
/r/MensRights05/02/09 09:41 PM
3

Related to this article at Psychology Today about why attractive men make poorer husbands: http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200804/why-handsome-men-make-bad-husbands-i from "The Scientific Fundamentalist": http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist Written, ironically, by a man. While the crux of the article seems based in decent psychology--any of the ugly guy know about the too-good-looking-for-his-own-good asshole and all the good-lo…
/r/MensRights02/02/09 05:13 AM
2

pssst- Television is a stupid, creatively bankrupt industry that lets its corporate owners stick its dick to spooge out any ol' message they want. Does this mean everyone who works in television is a stupid monkey or that television can't produce anything worthwhile? Of course not, but the people who control that television gets made at all either are, or want everyone who watches it to be; and so they massage the public consciousness into whatever image they want, and sadly a lot of the people …
/r/MensRights30/01/09 02:10 AM
1

It's not hard to see the logic, although it'd be nice to see it quantified in a lab. Women are searching for the best alpha provider for them, someone that makes them feel secure in their livelihood and future prospects, their own independence and financial security notwithstanding. If a guy is rich and able to provide luxuries and definite long-term security to a woman then naturally they'll feel more secure and more open to sexual stimulation. In simpler terms: More Money = More Security = Mor…
/r/MensRights22/01/09 10:09 PM
1

I'd imagine you're less likely to get clocked out by the gay guys afterwards, so there is a balance in place.
/r/MensRights17/01/09 04:41 AM
3

From the Publisher's Weekly blurb on the Amazon.com page for Kathleen Parker's book "Save the Males": "Although Parker's deliberate provocations make for lively reading, the majority of her claims are too fanciful and unsubstantiated to be genuinely thought provoking or even interesting (erectile dysfunction is caused by young, sexually aggressive women; women serving in the army put the nation at risk). Parker makes a poor conspiracy theorist, and her statistics and unverifiable theories are un…
/r/MensRights07/01/09 05:33 AM
2

Amen. As far as "men do everything they do to get laid." Welcome to basic human biology. We are hardwired to mate and reproduce. Aside from the basic appropriation of resources for survival, comfort, and the expansion/improvement of the means to obtain them, MOST OF EVERYTHING EVERYONE EVER DOES is ultimately in the pursuit of mating and reproduction. Certainly not everything, but a hell of a lot of it. At least half, likely more.
/r/MensRights15/12/08 06:10 AM
5

There is a blurry line between misogyny and gender equality. Sometimes it's easy for one to appear to be the other. As a men's rights forum there is a right to examine and deconstruct some of the double-standards of modern women in a healthy and gender-supportive context. Women can and have done the same in parlors, beauty salons, on The View, and in various print publications for centuries. An example would be the irritation caused by constant diamond commercials, encouraging women to see blood…
/r/MensRights14/12/08 08:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter