TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Crazy-Crazy-3593 Archive

View 2 posts and 697 comments by Crazy-Crazy-3593 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I was recently at a large chalk drawing festival, with artists from all over the United States, almost all of whom were college age women. One of my daughters asked me, "why are they all girls, are they better at drawing?" I said, "I don't know." I don't know, was I supposed to say, "When a 21 year old woman goes to her parents and says she'll be traveling around the country all summer going to art festivals, mommy and daddy indulge her and financially support that ... but if a young man wanted …
/r/MensRights28/07/26 04:33 AM
4

That is all true.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 10:14 PM
3

I certainly appreciate the debate, and I think your position is arguable. I definitely do not think we have a firm answer on certain aspects of evolutionary psychology. I still do not see merely "recognizing emotions" (ex. "My husband appears to be angry!") as ""empathy" ("I can tell that he's angry, not because of his facial expression and demeanor, but because I would feel angry if I was experiencing what he was experiencing, and it makes me angry just seeing it!") That said, I need to think o…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 03:54 AM
10

In principle, I agree with you: However, we can't even get them to accept the fundamental moral precept "even if some, or even, many men in the past oppressed women, it is unjust to punish or hold it against the men of today, something which they didn't do." They can't even feel empathy or open-mindedness for people who they can see aren't hurting them from firsthand experience; they're not going to keep an open mind about how much they can trust a portrayal of history (which happens to convenie…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:42 AM
32

Yes, the original feminists were rich women, because they were jealous of the rich men. Poor women and poor men both had their battles to fight: men had back-breaking labor and fighting other tribes or in wars --- women had the extreme danger and pain of child birth prior to modern medicine. (The widespread acknowledgement of these facts are recorded in the Book of Genesis: G-d's punishment for the sons of Adam is said to be that he must toil to make his living by the sweat of his brow, and for …
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:21 AM
3

Oh, I agree, if society wasn't so misandrist, LLMs wouldn't be.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:10 PM
17

It's a mainstream sentiment that women are empathetic, but it's not quite true. Empathy means "actively sharing and feeling the emotions of another person from their perspective"---ie "feeling with"... as opposed to sympathy, which is caring about someone's problems, but not experiencing them---"feeling for." Women imagine themselves to be more empathetic, because for various reasons (primarily explainable through evolutionary psychology), it is very easy for women to feel empathy---with another…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:06 PM
5

If a product just mindlessly repeats slop it finds on Reddit, marketing it as "intelligent" is extremely dishonest.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 05:50 PM
5

That's like asking: "Which is more damaging, a flash flood which puts water in your basement as a result of an extreme storm ... or a slow but steady, unstopping stream of water infiltration which washes away your house's foundation?" One appears to be more extreme (and attention grabbing), but in the long run they are equally damaging, perhaps the latter even harder to fix.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 01:58 PM
25

There is literally a sub (r/SeriousGynarchy) which has female superiority as its primary thesis, with hefty helpings of ideas for mistreatment of men. I have reported it to Reddit several times. The fact that Reddit would (rightfully) NEVER tolerate an open "superiority" group for literally any other demographic group, let alone men, proves your point.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 02:14 AM
1

Always bare in mind the narcissism of someone who is already wearing makeup making a huge production of putting on more makeup to draw attention to her face, because she's so narcissistic, THAT'S how much she needs attention.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 10:14 PM
4

Ever see someone say, "I have liver cancer," and the other person says, "That sucks! I had skin cancer, myself." And the first person snaps, "Skin cancer doesn't even exist! But anyway, if it did exist, you'd deserve it!"
/r/MensRights23/07/26 04:25 PM
8

Yesterday, my youngest daughter was watching Fuller House on Netflix. One of the adult women was talking to a teen girl about relationship drama of some sort, and the mother says, "So, what did you learn about boys from this experience?" Teen girl: "They're idiots!" They both laugh. Studio audience big laugh, scene change. That was the punchline: teen girl says boys are idiots. Mom and her yuck it up. This is TV Y7, super family friendly ... I realize it's relatively trivial--- but can we imagin…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 04:24 PM
9

Yes. Women who reject Feminism are hated most of all.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 08:34 PM
32

Absolutely, yes. It has all the features of a religion ... appeal to an unproven/unprovable Utopian past ("primordial matriarchy") which is prophesied to come again ("the Future is Female")... ... non-falsifiable, indefinable omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient force controlling everything ("The Patriarchy") ... ... Original Sin which corrupts everything ("all men participate and benefit from Patriarchy from birth") ... ... a sort of gnostic high priestesshood (Gender Studies professors and alli…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 08:33 PM
8

Yep. That's it, in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 08:18 PM
10

"The womb is the limiting factor to reproduction in societies, making women more reproductively valuable, so it made sense for societies to preserve women while treating men as more expendable (2/10)." That only "makes sense" in a society in which a relatively large majority of women actually intend on having children.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 01:03 PM
3

I personally hold the contention that "Women's Rights Advocacy" is distinct from Feminism, as an ideology. As for the contention: " Any movement will have its share of extremists, haters, and bad actors. They give the rest a bad name ...." ... well, the supposedly non-radical Feminists are completely unembarressed to be associated under an ideological umbrella with the radicals, until directly confronted with some particularly loathsome position of a radfem ----then they will No True Scotsman, i…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:15 AM
8

LLMs are crazy misandrist, because they learned by ingesting the mainstream of the Internet, which is crazy misandrist.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 04:28 PM
6

That is correct: The Feminist orthodox line would be that she was telling the truth in the first instance that she was raped, but her mother is full of internalized misogyny and got ahold of her and convinced her to lie by saying that she lied.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 04:27 PM
4

As a male English/literature major, I can tell you, 80-90% of English/literature majors are women, and 85-95% of them are liberal ... literary criticism classes are AS feminist as gender studies classes. These are people who believe things like, Shakespeare was simultaneously secretly a gay man; secretly a woman; and didn't actually exist.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 02:37 AM
5

The reaction of the hero/protagonist of the play, Benedick, to hearing that song is: "And he had been a dog that should have howled thus, they would have hanged him." So is Shakespeare's opinion what Balthasar sings, or Benedick's reaction? Neither one. Benedick is eavesdropping on Don Pedro and Balthasar, but they know he's eavesdropping, and the song is part of their plot to get Benedick together with Beatrice, by shaming him into taking her more seriously as a potential wife. Actual point: it…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 02:31 AM
6

Not familiar with her jurisdiction (NY), but most criminal courts have a day scheduled just to appear and enter a plea (guilty, not guilty, or ask for a continuance). If the plea is Not Guilty, that's all that happens that day. A subsequent day is set for a scheduling conference or pre-trial conference, to determine whether there are outstanding pre-trial issues and to set a date for a trial. In other words, I doubt if you can really infer much of anything from whatever happened this week.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 02:15 AM
12

White people are about 60% of the US population, so 59.1% of violent crime arrests is pretty in line with that. The rape arrest numbers and the offenses against the family are slightly higher--- not a lot higher, but slightly higher---but still irrelevant to whatever point they think they're making. Let's suppose the numbers were slightly lower than the Causasian share of the population ... do you think that would be evidence that "white people are less violent?" No, there would be a systemic ex…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 02:03 AM
1

Can you imagine if women lived on average 5-6 years less than men?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 12:40 PM
1

I have seen that study before, and in a sense you're right, but .... You don't find it the slightest bit suspicious that the one category the study doesn't report the sex of the perpetrators is the one most quoted as lesbians being biggest in----female perpetuated IPV/DV? That study is reasonably old, yet there have been no major studies of which I aware to follow up on the gaping missing piece of data: Do women in lesbian relationships experience more DV from other women than women in heterosex…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:34 PM
2

All very well said.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:05 AM
1

I am not remotely "embarrassed" to expose a hate movement for what it is. Since you are, apparently, a child, I will refrain from further personal attack on your lack of either comprehension or responsiveness to logic. EDIT: Since you ignored everything else I wrote, it's obvious you are not going to engage with any uncomfortable thoughts challenging the ideology (Feminist) which a "Patriarchal" society has bestowed upon you from a young age (funny, that, hmm?) ... I'm sure this is a waste, but …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 11:18 AM
1

" But it is not misandry, the motivation of the crime she committed is not that he is a man and that she hates men. " If this is your logic, then rape of women or violence against women should not be used by Feminists as evidence of a misogynist or Patriarchal culture, because the motivation of the crime is rarely hatred of women, but rather women opportunistically are capable of being victims of those crimes (just as OP was capable of being a target of this false accusation). If it is necessary…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:09 AM
1

They went to prison for planning bombings and breaking shopkeepers' windows not for merely wanting rights. Certain suffragettes were literal terrorists ... the part where they were "jailed" is conveniently remembered ... the serious harms to innocent people they committed are conveniently forgotten.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/26 03:17 AM
0

Women who like men are the actual minority. Go look up the recent New Statesman survey: 72% of young men view women favorably 35% of young women view men favorably 7% of young men view women very negatively 27% of young women view men very negatively As a general tendency, women are more susceptible to social trends and social influence ... and spend more time on social media ... and the misandrist brainwashing has been very effective.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:07 AM
2

Thank you. As an older man, I often think about how bad it must be for young men, growing up in a society which largely disadvantages you; calls you worthless, trash, rapist, monster, animal, useless etc; but then also that you're privileged and inherently benefit and support Patriarchy just by existing. I do believe if enough women stood up to misandrist women, the social cost to the bitter/crazy ones who push this stuff would be high enough that it would make a difference.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:57 AM
2

This is sadly true. We literally need to call them child soldiers for Feminists to think of it as wrong. Look how the media has consistently called the Minab school in Iran a "girls school," even though a majority of those killed were boys. Because they know if their audience knew what, they wouldn't find it as sympathetic.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:03 PM
33

Off the cuff, two thoughts: (1) the audacity ... the raw audacity ... to constantly lie to our face that "Feminism is about equality," and then fight to eradicate only "Gender-based Digital Violence against WOMEN." Literally, every single opportunity they've ever had to show Feminism was about equality and not female superiority, they've made choice to be misandrist. You can't tell me it's not on purpose. (2) As much as I have been truly ashamed and disgusted by what a shit-show the USA has beco…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 10:55 PM
75

Get out of here with this insane Orwellian newspeak. If Feminism wasn't both in control, and, at the end of the day, a misandrist hate-movement, they could have gone with the slogan of "Believe all victims." But they didn't. They went with "Believe all women." They could have gone with "Teach kindness and respect" or even "Teach people not rape." But they didn't, they went with, "Teach men not to rape." Netflix could have made a documentary called "Gender Wars," and included KillAllMen, MenAreTr…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:58 AM
13

That's what I came here to comment on ... "MEN DIE BEFORE THEY CAN GET THIS HOT! IT'S NOT FAIR!"
/r/MensRights10/07/26 01:51 AM
11

This is an excellent summary.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:27 PM
9

Yes. I have pointed out to Feminists, you can't say "95% of rape perpetrators are male"---if you are using conviction rates for that figure, as if you trust and accept conviction rate numbers---then also claim (as they do), that "1 out of 4 women are raped, the perpetrators are just not charged and convicted." Then, all of sudden, you're saying we have to use estimates, because "charged, tried, and convicted isn't reliable." But if "charged, tried, and convicted" isn't reliable, then you have to…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:24 PM
2

Yes. I am an "elder millennial" or Xennial, and when I was in high school, college, and graduate school, there was much more of this feeling of, if you're a son and your parents pay for you, especially non-essentials, you're a lazy freeloader ... but daughters would often have a bit of a "daddy's little girl" thing going, where it wasn't shameful for their parents to quietly give them money. I know it's anecdotal, but as an example, I had a male friend, whose parents told him, when he graduated …
/r/MensRights09/07/26 04:00 AM
18

There's a reason why, in Animal Farm, the pigs first say, "all animals are equal, " and only much later say, "but some animals are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights08/07/26 01:15 AM
5

I'm sorry, you are not factually, statistically, or objectively correct that rape results from unfulfilled sexual desire. There is no evidence to suggest that people who have been celibate are more likely to rape, nor evidence to suggest people who are highly sexually active are less likely to rape. (There's even mixed evidence to the contrary.) Frankly, that claim plays right into their hands: it's okay to hate those they consider "incels" because they're inherently on the verge of being rapist…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 01:09 AM
18

Disagree. A "female surplus" of women raised by people like this are not going to benefit men.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/26 01:58 AM
18

What utterly terrible human beings. Open disgust for these people needs to be normalized.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/26 01:56 AM
34

"She craved a close friendship with her future child, one that would last into old age. That seemed possible only with a female child ..." It is truly amazing how misandrist our culture truly is that people are completely unashamed saying crap like this is public.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/26 01:54 AM
36

"If someone believes that men and women should be equal but there are both some situations where men have an advantage over women, and some situations where women have an advantage over men, they are both a masculinist and a feminist." I completely reject this premise, and ironically, I actually think most Feminists would, too.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 02:08 AM
28

Ever see those Feminist posts where a bronze female statue has tarnished breasts from people's hand grease, and it's represented as proof men are monsters? This is just a harmless joke hurting no one but a statue though. Right? /s
/r/MensRights05/07/26 03:32 AM
10

It's misandry that publicly villifying your husband is seen by society as funny, popular, and even admirable ... but doing anything close to your wife would be tantamount to a war crime.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/26 03:28 AM
44

Women are not "expected" to wear makeup. There's a Mennonite grocery store near where I live, and a major Mennonite presence in the community ... no one, and I mean no one, has ever seen one of these women, who literally never wear makeup and said, "tut tut, they're indecent! Well, I never!" Meanwhile, at my job, I have to wear a suit and tie, and women have up wear "the equivalent." "The equivalent," by the way, could be suit skirts or ... you know ... leggings and a floral t-shirt. (Whatever. …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/26 03:24 AM
3

AND the main villain was an incompetent and ugly man, constantly upstaged by a competent and attractive female sidekick, with a gender-emphasizing name, right?
/r/MensRights04/07/26 03:35 AM
28

I'm sorry, but if your wife publishes a comic publicly attacking you like this, you need to leave her. What's wrong with these guys?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 02:56 AM
1

I agree with everything you wrote. I don't even believe it's possible to compare non-existence to existence, at all, so their entire position is nonsense to me.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:17 AM
28

To externalize their own failings to the environment around them, instead of internally. To claim victim status, even if actually individually privileged, and therefore cast others as oppressors. To manipulate public opinion. To virtue signal and in-group signify.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:49 PM
2

Should we not be trying to create the world in which we want to live? When the schools are closing and the playgrounds are unmaintained wastelands, the streets aren't plowed, the store shelves aren't stocked, the restaurants close, and you can't complain to the town council because no one is on it ... is that the world we want? I can understand not wanting to have children. It's a tremendous sacrifice in many ways, especially for women. But what I don't understand is how all these anti-natalists…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:36 PM
36

For those asking what this has to do with men's rights ... I am not OP, but I see it as: This is the final fruit of the death cult which is Feminism: This woman very explicitly frames reproducing as supporting the Patriarchy, and says: "Western populations should go childfree but in the long run “preferably … everyone” because “the advantages are clear and there are so many things to gain, especially as a woman”. The Feminist vision of the future is extinction. It's a hate group so hateful it ul…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 11:33 AM
9

Is "ret*rd" a slur? It was intended as, and for many years, accurately used, according to its literal meaning, "delayed." But people used it as an insult, to the point it became pejorative. I feel like we're way past that point with "cishet male" ... I don't think I've ever seen it used in anyway other to insult or diminish ....
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:06 AM
13

I used to go crazy trying to understand the cognitive dissonance of someone like OOP writing, in one breath: " .... release the comfort of black-and-white thinking ..." While simultaneously seeing the world in a completely black-and-white dichotomy of Goodies and Baddies (The Patriarchy/Feminists). The lack of internal scrutinization or intellectual honesty or basic logic or even self awareness is just not something I can easily grapple with. But recently I've realized none of this is about maki…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/26 01:53 AM
5

"Technically women play more but if we take depth into account then men play games with more depth." This is a really good point. I'm almost positive that in an average week, my wife spends more time on like, Rollercoaster Tycoon or a block smash game on her phone ... but she's also watching TV or supposedly listening to my supper table conversation. I might play Civilization a few hours in a week, but I'm actually focusing on it. I don't have a problem with those games, don't get me wrong ... b…
/r/MensRights27/06/26 02:15 AM
2

This is insane. Every single major news outlet, even within the last 24 hours is calling it a "girls' school" even though if you Google "was Minab school all girls?" the information is really available that it was not. I myself follow the news carefully and did not know that until I saw this post. Despicable.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:25 PM
3

Janice is one of the best. Very calm, fair, and knowledgeable. I would say she convinced me on two major points: (1) I went from from "not feminist" to "anti-feminist" because (2) the hate we see in "modern feminism" was there from the beginning, not just some recent development.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:58 PM
1

I have a huge problem with her spreading the "62 million men were in an online rape academy according to CNN" lie on her FB page earlier this year, and never retracting it or apologizing despite actually receiving a Community Note on it, and like, 80% of the comments pointing out that it was exposed as a lie, even by Snopes.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:56 PM
6

I'd add: Janice Fiamengo and Hannah Spiers
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:54 PM
16

This is exactly what OP is talking about. This is why men who are abused are afraid to call the police. Saying "the violence is really dangerous to women" is saying, "violence from women to men isn't dangerous." Therefore, if a man is abused, he won't call the police or otherwise report it---because in addition to the common desire to not "get her in trouble" (which affects victims of both genders in IPV) ... he also knows it will be seen by the police and society as trivial, "because she can't …
/r/MensRights25/06/26 01:53 PM
10

Answering a question with an irrelevant question, while complaining in other posts about bad faith. That's the sophistry one expects.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:52 AM
10

In Ukraine, about 60% of voters are women. Is it still the fault of men that they're in a war, because men are inherently violent, and therefore create war, and if we were finally in the matriarchical Utopia which Feminists like Gearhart and Daly prophesied, there would be no war? Because that's what this OP is about.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:48 AM
12

People thought it was irrelevant in Ukraine until it suddenly wasn't. But their point is that whether it's overblown or not, Feminists would NEVER tolerate an unequal, detrimental law to exist which disadvantaged women in any way. It exposes the hypocrisy of the claim that Feminism is "all about equality." In many cases, laws which actively benefit women in an unequal way (ex. government grants for women owned businesses) are seen as "not enough" or completely ignored. Feminists are insistent---…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:41 AM
12

Women have made up the majority of voters in the US ... SINCE 1964. How many years was that before you were born?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:08 AM
3

Yes, some polls have found only about a third of young women identify as Feminists: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-women-and-feminism I do think Feminists' extreme bitterness and hostility does alienate many women ... they're just not very inclined to argue with or publicly contradict them.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/26 01:22 AM
13

Think about the arrogance of bitter, hateful, single women speaking for all other women. Many women actually do love their boyfriends. This is why only a minority of women identify as Feminists, and those who do have to be SO LOUD to try to create the impression of social consensus. I just wish the many women who don't feel this way stood up to the hateful ones more.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/26 09:39 PM
25

The important thing to understand is that Feminism is a fundamentalist religion, first and foremost. They don't need to rationalize why violence against infidels is justified; its understood, just like a Jihadist or a Crusader understands that, without needing to have it explained.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:44 PM
17

So if Andrew Tate had a personal dispute with a woman and killed or tried to kill her, you'd say it has nothing to do with misogyny, it's just a coincidence?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:39 PM
24

... not one critical word about this murderous, genocidal psychopath in the entire article ... and nothing but praise for her ... ... beyond appalling. I would say, the masks are fully off of the Feminist agenda, but maybe it somehow yet gets uglier than this?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:37 PM
73

For anyone keeping track: Men's Mental Health Week was first established in June 1994, by Bill Clinton. Pride Week was first recognized at the federal level by Bill Clinton in 1999.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/26 06:31 PM
18

Yes, I agree that's an amusing typo ... or Freudian slip.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/26 06:29 PM
2

Not going to address the comment eh?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 03:39 AM
1

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." - Robin Morgan, former editor of Ms. magazine Does that sound like someone who thinks men are also negatively impacted by sexism!? "You can't hate all men can you? Actually I can. As a class, I hate men. I think any intelligent woman hates men," Suzanne Moore, originator of the hashtag, yesallmen. "Yes, I hates men. Most men are terrible.…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 01:56 AM
2

Really? What system? What Utopian system do only women support in which every country in the world has aligned interests, non-conflicting ideologies, and resources are unlimited? Do you realize the Suffragists specifically argued that giving women the vote would lead to world peace because women are morally superior to men? In the US, women have beem the majority of voters since at least 1964. Guess that's why the US hasn't been involved in any armed conflicts since then, huh? /s
/r/MensRights19/06/26 01:37 AM
2

cough Richard Reeves cough Scott Galloway cough
/r/MensRights19/06/26 01:22 AM
1

Incidentally, the majority of people executed for witchcraft in Valais, Switzerland, where the first major witch hunts occurred, were men.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:32 PM
3

I also don't recall Harry ever demeaning or putting down Hermione, despite her constantly condescending to him and lecturing him ....
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:30 PM
1

And you can be sure no "Gender Studies" departments will be conducting follow up surveys now that they know they might return that result!
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:27 PM
1

Good people don't need to declare themselves "good people."
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:00 PM
1

Lol, are you kidding me? If you want to go there, "It's all Palestinians, until it's no Palestinians!" or "Not all Palestinians but always a Palestinian!" or "If the Good Palestinians don't want to get lumped in with the Bad Palestinians, they need to stand to Hamas!" would fit right in to the Israeli ideology ... and the ideology of Feminism. Find me ONE university tenured or published Feminist who says, "It's morally wrong to hate an entire demographic of people based upon the actions of a min…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:54 PM
6

I sometimes think misandry might be a part of human nature---though I hope not to the degree to which it is currently being expressed online. The fact that in the supposedly deeply Patriarchial past, that physical violence against men was largely considered acceptable on a macro-scale, and/or indifference to the safety and bodily integrity of men was the norm, seems to indicate humans (men and women) are just mostly ok with treating men as disposable relative to women. A Feminist would say the B…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/26 08:52 PM
22

What a plague TikTok is
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/26 08:42 PM
8

Came here to complain about that last slide too ... ... I'm supposed to be impressed by his macho friend who was a dick to women for most of his life, but now because he has daughters suddenly he's a performative Born Again Feminist? Most of us have been capable of seeing women as equals--- not putting them on a pedestal---not seeing them as beneath us--- instead of swinging wildly between extremes. I really think a lot of these male Feminists must have get sexist pasts or very dark internal imp…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/26 08:39 PM
2

I'd like to believe a 16F wrote this. (That world give me some hope for the future.) But I don't.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 01:41 AM
2

The "almost" comment isn't in reference to greatness, it's in response to the humanity of men. It'd be one thing to say, "it's almost like many men are great!" It's another to say "men are human ... almost" I just hate that little winking, implicit, teehee "I still get to dehumanize you a little bit!" I think it's an interesting video and I'm not criticizing you for posting it, by any means. I just think it shows how truly DEEP misandry runs in our society, that this woman--- who clearly does ha…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 04:17 PM
9

I agree about not downvoting as a knee jerk reaction, but it's pretty clear from this person's responses that they are not here to learn and are engaging in bad faith, completely oppositional and unreceptive to the mostly very polite responses they are getting.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 04:08 PM
2

As I allude to above, the "almost" at the end kills the rest of it for me. If she wants to be supportive, don't make it a winking little joke, after all.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 03:56 PM
2

"Almost"
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 03:56 PM
5

I don't know if it's positive. Maybe ... "almost."
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 03:53 AM
7

The most famous "missing person" ever was probably Amelia Earhart ... I guess she was kept down by the Patriarchy?
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/26 03:09 PM
2

I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen a woman online object to KillAllMen or AbortMaleFetuses, and that is no exaggeration ... and I have seen those comments literally thousands of times. Thank you for taking a stand and speaking up, it does mean a lot to many of us.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 02:14 AM
1

Ok, fair enough.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 02:15 AM
1

They are completely unbothered by so-called radical Feminists. Every other ideology is expected to excommunicate the radicals, or be guilty by association ... but for some reason, Feminists feel they turn a deaf ear. Almost as if they don't actually disagree, and "good" ones are just more concerned with what they can get away with overly saying.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 01:55 AM
1

What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 01:50 AM
2

I appreciate your willingness to question "modern feminism," but I would recommend the videos of Janice Flamenco on the history of feminism. It has been completely white-washed now, but the suffragettes in the UK used terrorist firebombing to support getting voting rights. There's a case to be made that they actually DELAYED women getting the vote. It's also never mentioned that universal suffrage for men in most countries was not far apart from women voting. The thing is, Feminism has been a di…
/r/MensRights07/06/26 01:38 AM
1

How about advocating for the right to vote for all women at a time period when not all men had the right to vote--- but never advocating for those men!
/r/MensRights06/06/26 01:27 PM
6

"We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." Elizabeth Cady Stanton, literal founder of Feminism* *(author of the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848 Declaration of Rights recognized as the beginning of modern feminism)
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:31 AM
9

Look up Janice Flamenco's stuff on the history of Feminism. The central thesis of Feminism is that men are inherently oppressors and that women are inherently their victims. It's not reconciliable with any ideology which conflicts with that premise. (That is why it's so important for them to refer to The Patriarchy, instead of Oligarchy--- the Bad Guys must be masculine-coded.) Fortunately, believing that women ought to have equal legal rights as men is NOT unique to Feminism, but is a basic pre…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:25 AM
3

This is the actual answer. Aside: that said, I don't believe there is any possible system of leadership which would not be called The Patriarchy by Feminists. They feel no need to define what is or is not a Patriarchy or what a non-Patriarchy would be, so it's fundamentally impossible to disprove. For example, I once had an argument with a Feminist who said something in the course of a list of grievances of horrible things created by male leaders including "concentration camps." I said, "the fir…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:09 AM
1

Do we think a video of a guard in a women's prison asking why all women are criminals would be permitted to stay up?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 12:34 PM
1

Seriously, literally what could be more hateful than "the world would be better off your kind didn't exist"? Isn't that basically the quintessence of hate?
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 02:10 AM
1

Good point
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 02:07 AM
1

That is Zawn Villanes, and she is married and has three children (thankfully girls, so she won't be as tempted to abuse them). She is one of the greatest hypocrites of our time. Her husband is Jeff, whom she refers to in that post. Occasionally she writes about how even her civil rights attorney husband---who subsidizes her lifestyle---who is the "greatest person she's ever known" and "tirelessly fights for the oppressed" still "can ever truly be trusted" because he's a man. She asked a guest in…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 01:54 AM
9

The common denominator linking every wave of Feminism from the very beginning has been the devout belief in female moral supremacy. Why do you think there is the insistence on The Patriarchy as a unifying conspiracy theory? The evil power which controls everything can't just be the Oligarchy or the Bourgeois. No, it has to be male-coded, "the Patriarchy." Even if women are participating in it and benefiting from it--- it still has to be inherently male in nature (so you know it's Bad). The pluck…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 04:01 PM
5

According to the "study," yes. A better question--- which is the one I ask women who bring up this study is---are you prepared to consider all women who ever ask for sex more than once to be rapists?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:42 PM
7

That's exactly right: "repeatedly asking" is one of the "strategies" conflate with rape in this abomination of a study.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:41 PM
16

That's right. If Feminists were kvetching about the supposed Gender Wage Gap, would they say, "oh well, it doesn't kill you" If they were on about "the mental load" and "emotional labor," would they say, " oh well, it doesn't kill you" Would they apply this logic to ANY other form of discrimination? JK Rowling making mean tweets about TG people? "Oh well, it doesn't kill you" (*and if you say, "yes it does, they're more at risk for suicide"---SO ARE MEN compared to women) If a company didn't hir…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/26 11:31 PM
2

This reminds me of a Janice Flamengo quote: "If Feminism is styled as the revolutionary idea that 'women are people,' Anti-Feminism is the revolutionary idea that 'women are adults." OOP is just a completely adolescent viewpoint. It's arrested development ... a total failure to be able to live in the adult world, and not have any big bad villain to be able to blame for the Facts of Life, the things which we just have to grapple with as adults. There was a time when a majority of women understood…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/26 01:57 AM
14

Men have not been socially primed and conditioned to view themselves or present themselves as sexual victims. Even most women, if asked "have you been sexually assaulted?" will say no. To get the really high numbers which benefit Feminist organizations and Gender Studies departments, Feminists learned a long time ago, you can't just ask--- have you ever been SA'ed?'--- they ask extremely broad, loaded or confusing questions, and then overlay their definitions of SA over top of them. For example,…
/r/MensRights28/05/26 10:35 PM
2

Definitely.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:25 AM
38

I have ONLY ever seen romance novels mocked by men for the hypocrisy they represent ... ... either shaming men for caring about physical attractiveness while fantasizing about a guy who looks like 1980s Fabio ... ... or shaming men about porn while consuming randy erotica ... I HAVE seen women mock other women for reading romance novels for their low literary quality.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 07:50 PM
1

Cognitive dissonance is buying hard the brainwashing that "men are evil!" ... and while believing "men are evil," still resting your argument on: " ... women are saying that because for years they've seen men say the same ... " So even if you were right in the premise--- which you're not--- your conclusion is, "men are evil, therefore we should do the same thing as them!"
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:47 AM
2

"MeN aRe JuSt AfRaId oF BeInG LaUgHeD At, WoMeN aRe AfRaId Of BeInG KiLlEd!!"
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:42 AM
1

Not much except establish an elaborate system of justice, composed of law enforcement officers who are mainly men; to throw people in prisons, mainly staffed by men; full of inmates, themselves mostly men who consider that offense so heinous that pedophile rapists have to be segregated from general population or other criminals will kill them; and treat that crime as by far one of the most serious, punishable even by death by firing squad in some cases ... Or by "not much, " do you expect men to…
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:33 AM
1

There aren't any men who are "literal millenia" (sic) old. Or do Feminists admit they believe in Original Sin, that the sins of the fathers and grandfathers and great-great grandfathers must be ever visited upon the sons? "Two wrongs make a right" is a morally and intellectually bankrupt argument, even if the "facts and statistics" were truly in Feminists' favor, which they are not. The facts and statistics are that a majority of men respected women enough more than 100 years ago to favor giving…
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:14 AM
20

I think it's often overstated when people say their political or ideological opponents are "projecting" ... like I've seen people write the cliche online, "every accusation is a confession ..." BUT--- at least some of this misandry is projection/a confession. To at least SOME extent, these misandrists accuse men of the most vile misogyny imaginable because they are so full of HATE themselves that they assume men are too, because they know they would be if they were men.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 09:01 PM
26

I guess on the bright side, at least the pregnancy sub women flamed her. I still cannot countenance how the social media platforms tolerate this ... what even is hate speech if it's not, "this demographic group does more harm than good in the world and ought to be killed in utero literally for existing"??
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 06:29 PM
-1

That's a fair opinion. I personally have it less hard than most women, but also most men, so my personal experience of life is that if I had everything the same but had to deal with a woman's biology, it would be annoying. However, it's impossible to say, and the average man's life may easily be worse than the average woman's.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 01:21 AM
5

Well, I just searched for the OP and I can't find it, so there's no way to tell who's right. I don't support generalities, "in general," but on misandrist threads on Reddit, and posts like the OP ... I'm not a gambling man, but I'd put money on the cheering section being unanimous. Do you truly believe, in your heart of hearts, there was a woman on that thread saying, "you can't hate 50% of the population just because one inexperienced guy was disappointing!" Do you? If you can find it, and ther…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 01:15 AM
18

You could chalk it up to individual instances of mental illness, if it wasn't for the fact that I'm sure NOT A SINGLE WOMAN responding to her pointed out something as basic and obvious as what you wrote here.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/26 11:18 PM
17

I would agree with that approach, even though it is unjust. Look up the "Barbara Streisand Effect." Part of the problem with defending reputational harm is that you end up republishing and greatly magnifying the reputational harm.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 04:41 PM
9

I agree that seems like a way to at least appear to balance it. What would be the harm in creating that option?
/r/MensRights15/05/26 02:26 AM
-7

I really don't have a problem with it. A generally reasonable female coworker of mine recently used this option, and she is not generally misandric, and I can sympathize why she'd want to use it. If I was a male Uber driver I'd honestly think it might reduce false accusations or lower ratings because women more likely to misinterpret what you say or do would also be more likely to pick this.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 02:19 AM
-1

Women have to deal with a lot that men don't which sucks for them. To be clear, it in no way justifies the misandry of our age. Feminism wants to blame Patriarchy for literally everything, but honestly I have a theory that part of why some Feminists are so angry is that they are angry at their own bodies--- but who can they blame? God? The Universe? Instead, they misdirect that anger to men, who don't have to deal with: periods/menstruation, menopause, potentially pregnancy, and being generally …
/r/MensRights15/05/26 01:43 AM
7

I have pointed out how aggressive the British Empire was during the Victorian Age to be told "it was a Patriarchy." Like ... the ruler is literally a woman. You really think it Queen Victoria had decreed, "don't put the Boers in concretation camps" they would have just ignored her? Idk, they might actually think that. I mean, I like the analogy of "real feminism has never been tried" to "real Communism has never been tried," which you used ... but many of them unironically think that! I'm really…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 10:20 PM
5

It's sodomization by an object.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 10:09 PM
23

So would it be accurate for CNN to say "2.4 million women are in a 'killing little boys' online academy"?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 10:08 PM
17

Why did you cross-post this on the Feminist subreddit? (And why did they remove it!) With no context, everything (or virtually everything) you say is true. WITH context ... what ideological subreddit will remove a post if it contains a heretical statement like: "Pain is real. Male loneliness is real. Social alienation is real. But if your worldview turns every disappointment into resentment and every insecurity into ideology, eventually you stop growing as a person." I agree men must guard again…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:33 AM
2

If you want to make a Feminist as mad as they possibly can be, when they say, "nothing is more statistically dangerous to a woman than her male partner" or some other twisted schlock like that say: "Except obesity."
/r/MensRights14/05/26 01:46 AM
10

And women have been the majority of voters in the US for the last 45 years.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 01:43 AM
19

It might actually be better when they're denying it happens. When they admit that women kill or abuse men and boys, then they argue that the men or boys deserve it and had it coming, instead.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 01:41 AM
19

I agree with the other commenters pointing out that gross generalizations like this do not belong here, and make us no better than misandrists, if considered acceptable.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 08:37 PM
8

I know, I can't wait for when the long heralded REAL feminists finally show their faces and start showing anything other than contempt for men, let alone trying to help them with their problems.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 06:00 PM
13

I literally was just arguing with a number of proudly self-proclaimed Feminists ... and they were going on about how more men die at work, not because men disproportionately work much more dangerous jobs, but because "men are dumb and careless and take risks and women don't ..." One single woman---who explicitly said she was not a Feminist---said, "Even if that's true that men take more risks, it's often because the companies they work for pressure them to avoid safety precautions with unreasona…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 02:49 PM
4

You can suggest it, but that won't make it remotely reasonable for countless reasons.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 01:24 AM
9

Did you read it though? The "bad feminists" aren't the ones telling men to kill themselves, and telling other women that men are murderers and animals. The "bad feminists" are those who think there are any differences between men and women, and who disagree with the other feminists about economics. This piece is utterly disenguous. Hatred for men, ie misandry isn't even mentioned, even though misogyny would always be their central concern when talking about the so-called Manosphere. This piece s…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 11:09 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that. Incinidentally, this is a way in which I believe men are discriminated against. Post-vasectomy pain syndrome occurs in 1-5% of cases, and therefore should be medically classified as "common." (Medically common conditions are categorized as those affecting 1% to 10% or more of people) However, men considering vasectomies are often told that side effects are "rare" or even "very rare" and that is not technically accurate. (I was considering a vasectomy a few years ago, unti…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 01:05 AM
5

Yes ... Feminists are already making some movements to solve the population collapse by saying women should be paid at least subsistence rates by the government to be intentional single mothers using sperm banks ... ... in other words, making all those single "mediocre men" they hate so much have to support the reproduction of the women who hate them, through their tax dollars, while not getting reproduce themselves. Sperm banks ARE NOT in the best interests of men's rights, and should not be su…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 12:59 AM
6

"Statistics show 90% of men have attempted to commit what is legally sexual assault" These people are always so high on their own supply of toxic BS. I often wonder if they really believe their own made-up nonsense or if they just like saying it. At a certain point it's almost a kind of fetish.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 10:05 PM
5

That's a good point.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 09:59 PM
48

Oh, no, he doesn't have a PhD. in Anthropology for Harvard ... he has ... I kid you not: a PhD in "Theories of Patriarchy" from the University of Bradford That's a real thing. His name is Jeff Hearn ... author of " "The Violences of Men" ... ... why even write a paper? He could just write the title and sign his name, and we could imagine the rest of what he'd say about men being bad for the planet just from all that ....
/r/MensRights06/05/26 11:36 PM
1

(1) You can't tell the gender of most of the commenters, so that is "literally" not true. You're telling me the 10k+ up voted "god forbid a woman has a hobby" was made by a man? You believe that? You think a man wrote "I am hooooowwwwling"? Possible, but I think, unlikely ... and no evidence of that, here. (2) Men can have internalized misandry just as women can have internalized misogyny. (3) What do you even think "accountability" means in this context? Are we supposed to be accountable for ..…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/26 11:23 PM
42

Well, that sucked. But I have to blame her "partner," too. He apparently values "getting some" over standing up to a woman who is willing to say in a published article, not that she loves and respects him, but that she's "quite fond of him" (you know, like a nice dessert item or a vacation spot) and that she'll TRY to restrain herself from saying "ugh, MEN" in front of their son. Do we have any doubt that if a man wrote an article on how disappointed he was to have a girl---which virtually no me…
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:13 PM
1

I saw Alex Cooper (of the extremely popular and mainstream guest frequented "Call Her Daddy" podcast) recently have the video go viral in which she was advocating for young women to have sex with men they just met if "their body tells them they would enjoy it" even if they know they "don't ever want to see that guy again" from his behavior ... She specifically even references "taking him back to your house or apartment from the club" or something like that ... ... and women reacting to it want t…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:47 PM
8

There are 5000 choking deaths per year in US, about 50% women, so on average 2500 women die by choking in US per year. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499941/ In the US "approximately 1,000 women are killed annually by intimate partners, though the exact number varies year to year." That's from an "anti-violence" against women webpage quoting CDC data: https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/violence-against-women-in-us/ Major caveat: a majority of people who die by choking are elderly. (But a…
/r/MensRights04/05/26 08:58 PM
27

In the US, a woman is more likely to die choking on her food than to be murdered by her male partner.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 12:14 PM
18

Very insightful comment, and much of what I was thinking. On the one hand, it's encouraging to see a "strong, independent woman" as acknowledging misandry as both existent and bad. However, her reasoning for why it's bad is that women will get less of what they want (and, in fact, "need") out of men, not because ... you know ... men are actual human beings themselves, inherently deserving of a baseline of respect. She also proceeds from all of the same false or misleading premises or tropes as u…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 11:16 AM
16

They can't be reasoned with. It's funny, because exactly unlike the OOP, I grew up in a very conservative area but in a very liberal household, had liberal teachers, went to a liberal college, etc ... and until about 5 years ago, would have said I was a feminist or a feminist ally ... And then I saw hashtag KillAllMen. And MenAreTrash. And then the bear meme (which was really the last straw). And I began to really question their intentions, and read more about how the ideology was formed, and ab…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 11:10 PM
15

In the US, a woman is more likely to die choking on her food than be murdered by a date.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 10:45 PM
35

The Dadvocate recently shared the "62 million rape academy" thing on her Facebook page, saying "we need the good men to speak up and be heard!" and I'd say 75% of the comments were people pointing out that number is fake and posting links to the Snopes article and calling on her to correct it ... she got a Community Note and STILL didn't correct it. That made me lose all faith in her.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 08:23 PM
14

I'm sure women do get harassed running, but there's so much crying wolf going on anymore, it's hard to know what's what. I'm sorry, a van "beeping it's horn twice" and driving past you isn't necessarily harassment. If she was running on the shoulder or berm, it could just be someone wanting to make sure she knew they were there and about to pass her.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 12:21 PM
8

5th slide kind of accidentally let's the famous two panel "workplace sexual harassment" meme comic slip a bit ... "In my own life, I've seen the plainest of men commenting on women's bodies ..." ... so if they were attractive men, it would be OK then?
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 12:13 PM
18

Exactly. Even if you accept their premise--- which is false--- they're still saying: "We're the emotionally intelligent and empathetic ones, and YOU'RE emotionally stunted and out of touch with your feelings ... and also we're going to deliberately do things to hurt your feelings and manipulate your emotions, and there's nothing wrong with that!"
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 12:08 PM
3

It's so frustrating and immature. Virtually all of their issues could be trivialized and thrown back in their face that way: Oh, Trump [who I want to clear I personally do not support by referencing him] didn't invite the Women's US Olympic hockey team to the White House initially? It's not like it KILLED them! I thought misogyny killed? Didn't it just hurt their FEELINGS!? (Or, as they would say, if it was a men's issue, "fee-fees.") Oh, you say there's a gender pay gap? It's not like it KILLS …
/r/MensRights02/05/26 11:47 AM
2

I agree. Many women are rational, and many men are overly emotional, and if were going to make gross generalizations we're no better than Feminists.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:52 PM
1

And if there were 500 subscribers, one can only assume there were many more views ....
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:50 PM
1

Ah, one moment subs like that didn't exist. Now we should just pretend that they don't.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:24 AM
46

It's very, very important for Feminists to bully and socially sanction male abuse victims with all their power, because if men really started coming forward in large enough numbers to make it clear that SA is a two-street, they lose the favorite weapon. Think how many threads they play it as their trump card: whatever point you make, no matter how well cited and logical ... but "men RAPE!" Because then if you keep disagreeing, they'll call you a rapist. Just look at the "Rape Academy" propaganda…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 09:56 PM
6

I saw a (progressive) church web page sharing it [And no, I'm not criticizing the existence of a progressive church, one way or the other], on the day it went viral, saying "women who are victims of sexual violence should reach out for help today in light of being retraumatized by the news about the RA Academy," and there were women in the comments saying stuff like, "they were just starting to trust men again, and now this drives them to despair" and maybe "violence" or "revenge" against men is…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 05:08 PM
13

My response is: Charlie Kirk's almost last words were complaining about transgender shooters ... someone cried out, "do you know how many transgender shooters there have been?" (The answer is 5) and he said, "one is too many" So I ask them, was he right? (Because they hated him. I'm not saying I liked him. But they HATE him.) Sometimes they say, "you can't compare because trans aren't inherently violent, but men are" To which I respond, "except your argument for transgender people not being viol…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 05:00 PM
100

It hasn't gone away. The Feminist party line is currently: "Even if it was fake, the men who pointed it out as fake are still Patriarchal rapists or rapist enablers, because their instinct was to question it or else they would have never realized it was fake ... and also it shouldn't matter that it was fake if it was 'even 1 man,' because 1 is too many."
/r/MensRights30/04/26 12:02 PM
2

Uh huh. That's the real problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 11:13 AM
17

The first concentration camps ever were created in the Second Boer War, otherwise known as "Queen Victoria's War," due to her staunch support.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 10:37 PM
20

I've really been thinking a lot lately about a comment Janice Flamengo made recently in response to Hanna Spiers asking her why women seem to have such trouble feeling empathy for men ... And I'm paraphrasing, but she said something like: "I'm not an evolutionary psychologist in general ... but from an evolutionary psychology perspective, men need to have some degree of empathy for women for their mating strategy ... and women, both historically and recently, just don't need to have empathy for …
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:09 AM
4

I didn't mention Pearl, but from what I've seen, I agree, she strikes me as a grifter.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:11 AM
97

So in other words, tax men who aren't able to pass on their own genes to be able effectively subsidize the sex lives of a minority of men to have sex as much as they want without responsibility, and the ability of women who rejected the men paying for this to be able to pass on those women's genes? Why on earth would they think men would go along with this?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:09 AM
15

As I said when this false report began to circulate, it would be the main thing these people latch onto for the foreseeable future. If they "don't gaf about how many visited ..." -- why did they feel the need to lie in the first place? That's the sickeningly cynical thing. THEY made the value judgment: 1000 people isn't enough to get clicks. Better juice it up so women can share and comment and say "yes all men. " THEY are the ones who have an incentive to lie, to get their clicks and to write t…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 11:03 PM
16

Lauren (TheDadvocate) has lost me, based upon her posting on Facebook thing about "62 million men being in a Rape Academy" and she got a Community Note, and about 75% of the comments were men correcting her ... but she never amended or retracted, and her next comment was something about people trying to "cancel her" ... ... that was/is a huge issue, and she either fumbled big time, or showed her true colors. (I wonder if she may struggle with issues that don't directly relate to her husband's ex…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 10:49 PM
4

I don't per se agree with that, but I don't dismiss it entirely either. There is definitely legitimately some major form of "psyop" going on.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:00 PM
8

Facebook is beyond toxic. Recently, I have been posting a link to the Snopes article debunking the "62 million men rape academy" thing, and the most common response is for women to say, "found one"--- meaning obviously you're a rapist if you point out misinformation (so I guess that makes Snopes rapists ... idk, they might actually think that). However, some women have actually written---in response to me just posting a Snopes link--- that they're going to report me to CPS to have my children re…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 12:12 PM
14

Yep. You cannot reason with people who say anyone who has ever "asked repeatedly for sex" is a rapist.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 05:05 PM
24

Seriously. I do not support misogyny ... but they think there's some Red Pill / Manosphere pipeline ... NOTHING and I mean nothing will Red Pill or Black Pill a man as fast and as hard as just going and reading a major feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:45 AM
8

They say it's 10,000 years of oppression, and believe there was an ancient Matriarchy utopia ruled by Mother Goddess worship which men ruined with proto-Capitalism/Patriarchy. And no, I'm not kidding. Also, unfortunately, many of them do have children, whom they are deep into screwing up psychologically, fresh off their divorces in which they had to "carry the mental load" and "mankeep," etc. There's not much hope. Things will have to get much much worse before they can get better.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:40 PM
257

In the 2020s, women publicly cheer on other women for burning a man to death she dated for a year. To paraphrase the Lord of the Rings: "What can men do against such reckless hate?"
/r/MensRights23/04/26 04:21 PM
6

Men also work a lot more overtime, so if you just "divide those hours out," they appear to "worth more," even though it's apples to oranges to compare them to non overtime hours.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:37 AM
3

Well put. If I ever see a guy write, "I thought y'all chose the bear"---(a response I consider 100% understandable)---- and a woman writes back to him, "please don't say that, most women don't feel that way, the bear meme was stupid" ... ... I will (a) have a heart attack from shock (b) immediately doubt it's actually a woman and (c) if it is, THEN and only then start to feel optimism that some kind of equilibrium has been reestablished. As it is, it's going to get darker before it gets lighter.…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:56 AM
19

YouTube sure as **** wouldn't leave the video up.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:39 AM
18

Good news! If you have a son, you won't have to be afraid of him being raised by "2 loving, equality centered parents"!
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 10:36 AM
1

Probably this: https://youtu.be/ICVpIUeD6gY?si=jFzQ8rTnnVYwSWSI
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 09:31 PM
9

That's what I've been saying. If someone told you something really distressing and horrible happened, and then someone else showed you--- very CREDIBLY--- that it was much much less bad ... why would you be ANGRY instead of relieved?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 09:19 PM
18

If it was some quibbling difference between, like 62 million and say, 60 million, I could agree that "debating the numbers" is losing the forest for the trees. But we're talking about the numbers being wrong by several orders of magnitude. They're literally traumatizing other women by misquoting the numbers to this degree. If one sincerely believed these numbers ... and found out that it was 1/62,000th as bad ... shouldn't one be relieved? Shouldn't one be glad that there exponentially less vict…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 09:16 PM
45

Snopes explains it well. It's not 62 million. It's less than 1000. And these women know that, I'm sure. They WANT to believe it. CNN reported on 'online rape academy,' but '62M men' figure misrepresents findings | Snopes.com https://share.google/F7yfjpCOqU8Hjc0DD
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 04:43 PM
6

She posted on her Facebook page about 4-5 days ago "a viral R*pe Academy used by over 62 million men was exposed to teach men how to drug and SA women. Our sons need healthy masculine leaders to make sure this NEVER happens again." That post actually got a Community Note assigned, and probably more than half the comments are correcting her and demanding she took it down or amended ... but she has not. Her next post, 1 day later was: "Every now and then someone tries to cancel me, and I'm like---…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 10:50 AM
1

"What are my rights as a father in Pennsylvania if we are not married?" It doesn't matter if you were married or not. As a natural parent, you are presumed to have standing to seek custody. "What is the process for establishing custody or visitation?" Filing a complaint for custody in the Prothonotary's office of the county in which the child has resided for at least 6 months. Have an attorney do that, or if you're going to represent yourself, read and follow closely the instructions on the UJS …
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:59 PM
2

This entire thread is men pointing out the 62 million number plastered all over the internet is false by an enormous order of magnitude. If you admit that truth and facts don't matter to you, you hurt your own cause severely. Exaggerating---or lying, when one knows better---about these things has enormous consequences, including unnecessarily retraumatizing actual victims, and creating a culture of hatred and fear.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 07:23 PM
1

"Without context" wasn't the best phrasing on my part, but I'm quoting what I wrote on other sites. (My point was the absurdly unhinged reaction to my comment, not if my word choice was perfect. I don't think using the phrase "without context" arguably incorrectly justifies death threats and threats of false reports, do you?) I should have said, "without enough context" or "without clear context." It's clear from your own comment below that it was without enough context. Like ... was the comment…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:41 PM
6

Just a straight-up troll, I think. It always amuses me how much nicer people here are to "opposition" like this, than a man breathing a negative word about feminism or women's behavior in any way would be on certain major subreddits with a capital F or two Xs.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:09 AM
2

But don't you see, they're all MEN! She's not sexist, she's pointing out that all men are a monolith! /s
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:04 AM
8

The "bear meme" dehumanizes men by illogically and nonsensically asserting that the average man is worse than an animal. I agree --- no one who uses the "bear meme" can be an eglatarian.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:03 AM
10

I love this succinct response! I personally HATE how the "bear meme" damages mental health and gender relations purely for ragebait ... but honestly it's the stupidity of it which is most depressing.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:00 AM
3

He's most likely referring to this issue: CNN reported on 'online rape academy,' but '62M men' figure misrepresents findings | Snopes.com https://share.google/Bep12igwtSk3UfcKx
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:51 AM
17

I'm glad at least that this report puts them on the defensive. Their rationale for why it's OK to hate men is "men deserve it because 'they hate us' ..." but then the men DON'T hate them. Now they'll still say "well, the men are lying" or "they're not emotionally intelligent enough to know they hate us" or whatever nonsense they come up to defend very obviously being sexist, but it might actually be slightly harder for the brainwashing not to be showing, to the small number of open-minded people…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 01:47 AM
3

I've come to strongly agree with your take in this post, in the past few days. It drives me crazy, as someone who cares about truth and accuracy, to see how many Feminist talking points are either lies or flagrant misconstruals of facts. (Ex. "Women couldn't even have bank accounts until 1974!!") I have believed that even if you can't change the person making the statement's mind, it's better the other people see you challenging and correcting them. However, in the last few days, seeing not even…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 01:57 PM
1

As an American living in a blood-red rural area, the vast majority of people I've ever met who were really strongly anti-abortion were women. You can say they have "internalized misogyny" or you can say they sincerely believe that conception begins at birth. If it only becomes morally wrong to kill a fetus after it is born, then suppose we do invent an artificial womb at some point: if the fetus/baby is never in a natural womb and is never born, then can we just ... commit infanticide at any poi…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 01:40 PM
1

Same here.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 01:23 PM
1

Surely this was a test! Don't engage, everyone! Don't answer! Listen to OP!
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:52 PM
4

Caring about threats and danger includes caring about truth and accuracy.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:52 AM
6

Snopes explains it well, if you want to correct anyone. Not saying you should get into it, but if you do: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cnn-online-rape-academy/
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:42 AM
4

If MAGA dufuses were sharing a story saying 62 million illegal immigrants or Muslims or Cubans or whomever were rapists and it was actually 1000, would your attitude be, "eh ... they're basically right ..." "Anyone who corrects them is defending terrorists" ?? Also, just to be clear, as per Snopes, the "rape tips" wasn't even a forum on the site with 62 million hits, it was a Telegram group linked in a chat: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cnn-online-rape-academy/
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:38 AM
7

If you're really upset that something horrible is happening, you should be relieved that it's 1/62,000th as bad, not angry at the people who point that fact out to you. I don't understand why someone would be ANGRY to hear there's not more perpetrators and victims. Being disappointed men are less evil than one thought, and there's one less arrow in one's quiver to use to talk about how bad men are, instead of relieved less people are being subjected to this does make one a "misandrist"--- if one…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:27 AM
24

You're being downvoted for saying it's reasonable for posts to say 62 million men are doing something that "up to a thousand" are doing. It does not help the cause of safety to exaggerate. That's as basic a principle as The Boy Who Cried Wolf. It's harder to believe the rest of the point if one starts with a gross exaggeration (in the order of magnitude of a factor of more 1,000!) from the beginning. If I said, "2,000 people are killed by killer bees in the US every year!" And then when pressed,…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:24 AM
9

That much I agree.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:05 AM
22

I guess it's open to interpretation if they were "threat" per se. I take them as threats, albeit not serious ones. Two responses to what I posted above were: "I'm kind enough that I hope you don't suffer long after you're turned to pink mist by the truck I'm praying you're hit by" And "This fucking penis-haver here is why I'm calling for violence against their kind! Enough is enough!" I reported this to Meta, and inexplicably the first WAS taken down but the second one WASN'T ... despite the cat…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:35 AM
12

The go-to move is to literally call you a rapist. If anyone posts on social media, "you have to compare apples to apples" --- an extremely innocuous and polite comment, they will respond with cliches like, "you're the kind of man that makes us hate men" or "found one!" Etc. They think their social violence is subtle, but what it actually reveals is that they don't actually care about rape except to use it as a social weapon/ace in the hole to silence you.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 11:02 PM
40

So what % of the videos were "that type of content?" Because porn sites have millions upon millions of videos. It's like saying all men are interested in r/wolveswithwatermelons, because the host page it's on (Reddit) has 2 billion pageviews a month. Lying about victimization is a form of harm to women. You should be relieved and encouraged to hear that far, far less women were being victimized than reported, not disappointed. Unless of course you were just glad to have another apparent justific…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:43 PM
59

Yep, this is a bad one folks ... I have a post on it awaiting review in r/everydaymisandry ... ... get ready for this to be one of their mantras for years and years. I posted the following on certain other social media sites: [The "report" being referencing by CNN is an investigation into a Telegram chat called "ZZZ" where members shared this information. However, the group contained 1,000 men. The 62 million figure cited in the number is TOTAL PAGEVIEWS for the pornography site, Motherless. Tha…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:40 PM
22

One of my biggest peeves with their ad nauseum use of rape as a trump card: They insist that men are very rarely charged with rape and even more rarely convicted, by assuming that the true number of all rapes of women by men is the number extrapolate and projected from surveys--- resulting in a high number--- and rationalize "we have to use projected estimates because we can't trust convictions." However, when it comes to men SA'ed by women (or false reports), NOW all of a sudden we use convicti…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 10:37 PM
1

And women only got the right to vote because of WW1, NOT because of the efforts of feminists. Almost all "progress" for which Feminists claim credit occurred as a result of other historical/socio-cultural events or, especially, technological development.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:56 AM
12

"I have no idea how mankind is expected to reproduce from now on." Cue the meme from Invincible: "That's the neat part: we don't!"
/r/MensRights12/04/26 10:48 PM
22

Social media is so absurdly toxic that anyone, in any context, is upvoting a post which includes, "I don't want to be alive anymore." It just goes to show how not just misandrist, but misanthropic these people are ... ... the commenters don't care about her. They're not saying, are you OK? Or anything along the lines of, "don't hurt yourself." They indicate no concern for her ... just pleasure that she hates the way they do.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/04/26 10:40 PM
21

Men need to do 50% of the cleaning Men need to do 50% of the cooking Men need to do 50% of the child/pet care Men need to pay 50% of the bills Men need do 50% of the mental load I can't wait until I get to do 50% of all that stuff. That would be relaxing step down from my current 80%, 100%, 75-80%, 100%, and ... unmeasurable because it's made up. The "mental load" crap is seriously the Instagram/TikTok/Facebook reels feminists' greatest invention ... ... just think how ingenious a work of mental…
/r/MensRights12/04/26 02:19 PM
22

Is "advocating for commission of crimes against a demographic group" REALLY somehow not against TikTok's terms of use??
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 02:37 PM
6

Many of them probably do know that there have been female serial killers, but they usually have killed men or children or elderly, so these women don't care about that, because they are so narcissistic/solipistic, they think of the victims as people who aren't like them.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 02:35 PM
5

It is really not that easy to get 2,379 up votes on a platform which also allows downvotes.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 02:30 PM
52

A lot of these terms are new to me, but I'll tell you this much: my wife works in a field which is about 80-90% women, but all of the supervisors are men ... because women never apply, because the supervisors only get paid about 3-4% more, for a lot more responsibility. I've always been curious what motivates the men to apply ... they resign themselves to it, like, "well, someone has to be supervisor?" Wife at home pushes them---"you're not going to turn down extra money just because it's more w…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:10 AM
11

I honestly can't fathom the audacity these women have to say, in the 2020s, without a trace of irony, "women have been taught from birth to anticipate and play to the needs of others, especially men ... we've taught to speak softly and patiently to cater to the unstable emotions of the people around us, been taught that it's our responsibility to ensure that our male counterparts are happy ..." Good lord, does this comment just ... fill me with rage. I have no idea how someone could be so full o…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/26 01:43 AM
15

"We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, author of the 1848 Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments, widely regarded as beginning modern feminism
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/26 12:52 AM
8

Weird self-own to admit that she's too lazy or incompetent to select the massive amount of both recent and classic literature with female protagonists.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:43 AM
4

I can't believe anyone, anywhere loved "Gods of Egypt."
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:41 AM
33

Has anyone ever actually heard a man complaining (let alone "crying") about the "male loneliness epidemic"? I have ONLY ever heard it referenced in the context of it being some kind of supposed feminist/misandrist "gotcha". By the way: "Roughly equal shares of U.S. men and women say they’re often lonely" https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/01/16/men-women-and-social-connections/ And word of advice to any man who doesn't already know: The only woman--- if you're lucky--- who is ever go…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/26 12:34 AM
47

https://www.justjared.com/author/ilana/page/46/ There's the same author gushing over a penis being destroyed by super powers in The Boys spinoff. She seems to have a considerable web presence, including being a People contributor. This is the world we live in. She's an up and coming entertainment writer, with a flare for writing about mutilation of men ... gender reverse that scenario and she'd probably have been expelled before graduating and banished from society ....
/r/MensRights06/04/26 09:52 PM
8

So on slide one, basically they typed the first two paragraphs ... then realized, "whoopsie, this actually reads in full alignment with Traditionalism/The Patriarchy, ie women are valuable as mothers and producers of life"--- realized it implies that women are most valuable to human society in that role--- realized the phrase "as if women didn't do a good enough job at growing intelligent life" raises the issue of, "do declining birth rates imply they AREN'T doing a 'good enough job'---- and ins…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/26 01:17 PM
7

Excellent write-up. From what I know, I'd be shocked if there were not significantly more men executed as witches than midwives, given that as I understand it, at least 25% of those executed were men (another fact Feminists don't want us to ever think about or know).
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/26 01:10 PM
3

I would have said, "if you're a trainee lawyer, you cannot ethically be the 'enemy of all men.' You're going to go in front of male judges; you're going to have to represent male clients; you're going to have friendly male expert and fact witnesses; even if you only represent women, they're going to have male children in custody cases ... they're going to have new boyfriends and husbands. They're going to want you to write wills and do deeds which involve their male relatives. You're going to fi…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:19 PM
21

How many women do you think give a flying fig about making sure they understand men's "psyches and our lived experience"? Do you think they care that THEIR OWN "female experience" is the default? Are they worried about making sure their "focus" isn't too "narrow," as partners for (hetero) men? It's not even narcissism, it's solipsism. They can't even look at a man's book shelf, as a potential romantic partner, and say, "huh, what types of things is he interested in?" without the focus being on "…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:06 PM
89

Almost all of feminism is built on the Motte-and-Bailey fallacy: Make an outrageous, unreasonable statement that you actually mean--- if anyone challenges you on it, retreat to a more defensible position, and act like it's obvious that was what you always meant, so that, really, the one challenging you is the unreasonable one.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 12:52 AM
1

Hey, remember when that documentary, "Manosphere" came out, and almost every media outlook pushed it really hard for Netflix, but the public overwhelmingly said, "Meh. You have to search that stuff out, so it doesn't matter"? /s
/r/MensRights04/04/26 12:48 AM
24

Feminism is a fundamentalist religion, and that's part of its litany. (Or if you prefer, a mantra. Or, if you prefer, a "call and response.") It's not meant to make sense, it's meant to show in-group solidarity and advertise ideological loyalty. It's like the scene in Star Wars: the Acolyte, where the lesbian space witches chant, "We are One, We Are Maaannnny."
/r/MensRights03/04/26 02:16 AM
88

Is it really against the forum rules to "dox" this person if he wrote an "article" with his real name, as a content provider? I feel like his male patients have a right to know that he's kvetching about listening to them.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 09:49 PM
0

None of those things (especially ageism) are going to improve in a future where every young person has to economically support and/or be a caretaker for about 3-4 elderly people. Regardless, you're free to not care about the future out of pessimism. The question was "who cares" and the answer is, "I do."
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 03:39 AM
1

If you can get "overriding people's free will" out of "I care about birthrates collapsing because children are the future of society," maybe you should go find some tea leaves or animal entrails or Rorschach blots to read shapes into. You might be able to find something more meaningful than asking "who cares?" and when someone days "I do," you say, "So what?" If you don't want to know who cares, then don't ask.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 03:33 AM
1

I have to admit, I myself will internally tell myself, "you just got to man up" at times in my own self-talk. I have a job with a wide diversity of responsibilities, quite frankly many of which no one else can do. If I have had a bad day in my personal life, or I have a migraine or a back spasm or something, I will tell myself, "you're just going to have man up" to motivate myself, because the truth is, "no one is coming to save you." My wife works, but I make two-thirds of the income. And she h…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:00 PM
19

'Women don't even need to be "covertly" violent.' I reported a self-identified "feminist" woman on Facebook for telling a man who (cordially) disagreed with her, about three days ago, to "go end himself with something sharp and rusty" and the comment was NOT removed after review. I cannot fathom how that is not against their community standards, unless there's different rules for different ideologues.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 07:52 PM
1

I do. People do who recognize that we live in a society, and children are the future, by definition, and as a participant in society, it's in my best interests for enough people to have children for society to continue to exist and function.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 06:54 PM
11

I don't know if it's the reason, but one of the effects is that Feminists can say "look how bad men are, you don't see any female predators getting banned or criminally charged!"
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 06:49 PM
40

The Gillette ad from 7 years ago, which caused a 15% drop in sales?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 12:41 AM
2

Saw this on Facebook. Reported it as spreading hate. Obviously it was not taken down, but I encourage anyone who sees it on a platform to keep repeating things like this to the platform. Do we have ANY doubt that if someone posted anything about "women shutting the fuck up" that it would be taken down by the platform in a hot minute? If it's "about equality," then let's have equality.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 04:01 PM
1

Ok. So ... go on.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 02:39 AM
2

Because many of the people who respond in the way you are describing don't actually care about women being sexually assaulted, they just view "rape" as their ultimate trump card to win any position jockeying to be the ultimate victims. "Oh yeah, well, women get RAPED and that's the WORST thing that can happen!" ((Therefore, when it comes to being oppressed we WIN.)) They count on most men being chivalrous and handling them with kids gloves, and not challenging them on how they are appropriating …
/r/MensRights29/03/26 02:29 AM
3

Women also live longer if they're married, despite what Feminist propagandists may tell you. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/#:~:text=Similarly%2C%20at%2065%20years%2C%20TLE%20for%20married,Such%20marriage%20protection%20effects%20decreased%20with%20age https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/mortality/19-310689-Health-E-Stat-Mortality-H.pdf
/r/MensRights28/03/26 08:12 PM
41

Oh, but don't you know that, according to Feminists, Einstein stole everything he did from his wife?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:14 PM
13

I agree, but these are the same people calling 13 or 14 year old boys "incels" (as if they're "supposed" to be having sex?) ...
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:21 AM
6

We, as men, are more likely to die at a younger age than you, period. So what does that prove?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:14 AM
9

Those are all good things to think, but, unfortunately, they are not consistent with feminist ideology. Look up, as a good example, Janice Fiamengo, and how she became disillusioned with feminism.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:10 AM
5

I agree that given TwoX's popularity and insanity, its omission is glaring.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:00 PM
6

I guess we're just supposed to ignore the convenient misandric coincidence that the Evil Power in this mythos which controls everything, unseen, undefinable, but an explanation for everything (like Dark Matter)---the "Patriarchy"---just happens to be male-coded ... while the Good Guys, the righteous band of freedom fighters struggling against their omnipotent opponent against all odds---Feminism---just happens to be female-coded? We can't call it Oligarchy vs Eglatarianism. No, it MUST be male v…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 02:39 AM
13

Well, complain to your congresswoman. Or better yet, the state assembly, which is 51% women.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 11:23 AM
23

I can't tell you. I had an extended "argument" on Facebook yesterday in which they were going on about how the world would be perfect if males didn't exist ... how the world could be a matriarchy the way it was meant to be ... ... then they could gradually reintroduce males with selective IVF from frozen sperm donations, and they'd keep only the "best males" like "lionesses" at a 10:1 ratio. "They wouldn't mind sharing with her remaining highest quality men" with their "sister-wives" etc etc. So…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/26 07:02 PM
1

Yet I'm sure she has no problem blaming the legions of men en masse who have nothing to do with the situation at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/26 06:30 PM
8

No, this sub is not happy with sexist "jokes." She's not joking. She's "joking." Saying hateful things and then hiding behind "it was a joke, bro" is recognized as misogyny when men do it. Are women so weak and simple-minded they're not responsible for their "jokes"?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 12:55 AM
13

Brie Larson's mistake was the genre she was promoting had an audience of mostly men. Carpenter's target audience eats this crap up.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 12:51 AM
-2

Forcing a woman to have a child she doesn't want is a good way to bring a very miserable, neglected child into the world, which has its own social costs. That said, I think when I see young women complaining about doctors hesitating to remove their tubes, which they blame on "patriarchy" (but is actually because doctors are afraid of getting sued by these women if they change their minds later)--- we say, as a society, "let's make a deal: doctors can't refuse to remove your tubes but you have to…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 06:16 PM
18

Idk, we don't listen to that kind of music. You tell us. Maybe they're just talking about a specific type of woman.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:28 AM
6

I am a left-leaning centrist, and it drives me crazy. I have begged, implored them to stop saying this shit, and I honestly think they'd rather lose every election forever and let the world go to hell than be even slightly less misandrist. If they really think men are so bad, I don't know why they also expect them to be magnanimous saints, such that they can spit in their face, then ask for help.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 09:38 PM
11

Yes, and they HATE it if you point that out to them, since one of their primary smokescreen to justify hating men is "how much danger they're in".
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 11:36 AM
18

It's much older than that. Suffragettes described themselves as "terrorists" and engaged in bombing campaigns which killed a handful and wounded dozens, then actively tried to scrub the historical record of use of violence after they got the vote: Suffragette bombing and arson campaign - Wikipedia https://share.google/mKEDJo0KdkXJYVrzz
/r/MensRights17/03/26 02:18 AM
18

I was going crazy at the audacious hypocrisy of this video reel on Facebook, of this woman performatively hiding mace or a stun-gun in her skin-tight jogging outfit, before going out jogging at night, and saying, how sad it is that she has to do this, with "rape and femicide at an all time high"* ... and all the comments are like, "I wish all the men would disappear so we can go jogging and feel safe!" and "this is why we choose the bear!" ... and I'm like ... but you don't. If choosing the bear…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 01:59 AM
4

Janice Fiamengo, in particular, is very articulate on how feminism has NEVER been about "equality," and has always been about female supremacy, including in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhE38rHQiiE
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 08:14 PM
23

This is extremely sad that they basically bullied this seemingly young man into groveling before them for the circumstances of his birth. And I can't even get into the solipsistic, narcissistic, juvenile BS of the slide taking the ol' "when women say we HATE men, we don't really mean it" [even though I admit I say it "all the time" and I can see through this post it's having a negative impact on your mental health!] BUT I somehow can read the minds of men who say they hate women [DO men really s…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 08:09 PM
3

I agree. I disagree with a lot of his stuff and do not generally endorse him, but I think his theory about "ick" is not bad.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 10:28 AM
7

Good question, to which I do not know the answer.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 02:36 AM
16

Wtf is wrong with Reddit, seriously? I get that they have no regard for us (men) as people, but do they seriously think a sub like that is mentally healthy for the women in it?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 01:41 AM
14

The unfortunately named YouTube poster "hoemath" has a really good post about "the ick," in which he basically proposes that (despite what they claim they find attractive) women are attracted to men who appear "unaffected" ... ... hence the original meaning of "cool." A "cool" guy was someone who was unaffected, like Humphrey Bogart's characters. Maybe not truly emotionless, but showing almost no outward emotion. Arguably, it may have something to do with the idea that a man who is sort of this …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 01:37 AM
41

I knew a guy in high school who was at the top of his class, went to be in the Navy ... someone broke a bottle over his head in a bar, he got a traumatic brain injury, had to be discharged, and spent two years living at home with his parents until he recovered enough to do anything. Yet to a modern social media feminism-stoked woman, that's as "funny" as 35,000 likes (slide 2, 3rd comment).
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 12:07 AM
33

How about the bald-faced delusion that any given woman is "surviving rape on a daily basis." I seriously wish it was possible to send these women in a time machine to like, 1700 BCE, and bring them back and be like ... what did you learn about what your life in 2026 was really like?? It's scary how beyond delusion women on the internet are ... truly childlike. Like, imagine a kindergartener sticking their tongue out at a boy next to her, and the teacher goes, "be nice! Treat other kids the way y…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 11:11 PM
27

They even downvoted him saying he didn't look at her phone, that she was looking at it right in front of him.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 11:02 PM
3

That is true, but not nearly as much as you might think. And enforcement (or lack thereof) or manner of enforcement also often matters as much as the policy. I still think it's more a cultural issue. Being surrounded by feminists who talk about Patriarchy in a blue city in a red state is going to feel more misandrist than living in a small town in a blue state, much of the time.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:08 AM
10

The state vs state narrative is highly deceptive when it comes to cultural issues, like misandry. A rural area in a "blue state" has much more in common with a rural area in a "red state" than it does a major city a few hours away. Region or city is what you'd have to look at, not "state."
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:41 AM
1

To my knowledge, I don't even think Andrew Tate has ever asked someone in a pod cast, "Why do we allow women to exist?" but the gender reverse of that cannot be said for Zawn Villane ....
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 02:11 AM
2

I honestly don't know how ol' Zawn is still supposedly learning about how men are "even worse than she imagined," considering according to what she's written in the past, even her civil rights activist, perfectly loving and perfectly supportive husband who has admittedly never gone her any wrong still has a heart of darkness .... EDIT: I just read her post now, and it's ... her complaining about men not being willing to pay her to insult and lecture them. Curious: can anyone see any public evide…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 02:10 AM
8

Almost every feminist talking point is a lie. (Or at least a twisting of fact.) At least the following major talking points are not true in some form, with the banking thing you referenced right at the top of my list: (1) "Women could only own bank accounts for 50 years!" (Also sometimes stated as : women couldn't own 'property') (2) "Single, childless women are the happiest demographic!" (3) "Single women live longer than married women [because men drain their life!]" (4) "Most men abandon thei…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:02 AM
12

Honestly, I have a fantasy of a feminist being forced to repeat the phrase, here: "Suffering does not mean systemic oppression" ... while looking in a mirror, over and over, until the light bulb finally comes on ....
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:50 AM
11

But if you were really de-centering men because they're SOOO awful, you'd come up with an metaphor to use which didn't reference the ability of a fictional Spider-MAN, created by the MEN Stan Lee and Steve Ditko!
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:47 AM
16

Obviously, having low tolerance for someone you promised to stick with for the rest of your life is a virtue! And women free from Patriarchy are quicker to get out of a harmful situation, even though, uh, the situation actually isn't harmful! Plusgood doublethink!
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:31 AM
18

I had a pretty good professor who said he envied extreme religious fundamentalists at times, because "how could you ever be so certain about anything like that? It must be nice, in its own way" ... This reminds me of that.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:28 AM
3

Note that media reporting of this study never mentions that 18% of Gen Z women in the same study ALSO say wives should "obey" their husbands compared to 6% of Boomer women. Mentioning that would have the effect, of course, of making people wonder about the validity of the whole thing ....
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:23 PM
17

My response to the assertion that there is an "epidemic" of male violence is as follows: (In the USA): "Rape and sexual assault decreased 56% from 1993 to 2022." IPV decreased 84% from 1995 to 2021. (From an analysis of the FBI incident based reporting system by the Council for Criminal Justice ... Halfway down first page: ) assault-fact-sheet.pdf https://share.google/LxBo46qHD7NgHjYvb Therefore, the last 2-3 generations of men have been the least violent, EVER. By what definition of "epidemic" …
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:09 AM
13

Thank you. I will say, the bullying which women who stick up against misandry suffer from feminists is often even worse than bullying which they direct at men.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:33 AM
19

Seconded! Generalized hatred is their way.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:27 AM
3

I didn't know there was a whole subreddit ... I guess that shouldn't surprise me. I don't want to trivialize mental illness, but it does seem probable, from what I know, that she literally is ...
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 10:55 PM
3

That's what they say! It's infuriating. It's all bad faith, "team sports" types politics to them. The attacker was on "your team, " so it doesn't count as you doing good!
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:30 PM
2

You're exactly right.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:27 PM
18

Feminists would just say (irrelevantly): "But the ATTACKER was a MAN!" ... implying therefore it "doesn't count."
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:25 PM
4

What a self-own, to admit your ideology is parallel to that of people who use slurs. Imagine un-selfconsciously seeing some racist use, say, the N-word with an asterisk to try to avoid being autobanned, and thinking, "oh, I emphasize with this person's ignorant hatred, that's how I feel about half of humanity!"
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 01:20 PM
42

The toxicity of Dorka Molnar aka "Lainey" Molnar is well known, if you look her up. I have to say though ... [I] don't believe that the sole value of women is in bearing children, though I also think we should honor motherhood. But I have to recognize the irony and hypocrisy of outspoken, "childless by choice" women like Molnar taking credit for other women's contributions to society through childbirth .... EDIT: I also just have to add, speaking of irony: Thinking it makes women look GOOD to sa…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 01:07 PM
2

That's what I was just saying to another commenter: Hating men as "a system" implies blind, indiscriminate hatred based upon membership in a group which one did not choose to join and cannot leave. Hating women as "people" has more of an implication that they are humanized and seen as individuals with hate worthy distinct qualities. (Obviously, I don't condone any hate, but "people" based hate seems much more ... human.)
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 01:45 AM
4

Which goes to show how full of crap they are, since part of the whole Motte and Bailey routine is "I hate Patriarchy, but of course, Patriarchy hurts men, too" ---- but then when it's convenient to justify hating men "as a system," the object "men" now seems to be equated with Patriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 01:44 AM
3

I was thinking that, too. The way they're saying it makes them seem WORSE. Hating men as "a system" implies blind, indiscriminate hatred based upon membership in a group which one did not choose to join and cannot leave. Hating women as "people" has more of an implication that they are humanized and seen as individuals with hate worthy distinct qualities. It's crazy they can't see how what they're saying is worse. (Obviously, I don't condone any hate, but "people" based hate seems much more ... …
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 01:41 AM
2

I'm pretty sure her vision was that 10% would be completely dominated by women in every way. The vision isn't ... men would be warlords with harems and concubines. The vision is, men would be cattle in a stable under the female government's control.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 08:03 PM
62

Came here to say that. I thought it was a bit hateful first I heard it ... later realized it was a literal call to genocide. It's a really good example of how normalized misandry is. Kathleen Kennedy wore a shirt referencing this slogan to Star Wars at a major event. Can we even conceive of what the gender reverse version of this would be? Kevin Feige wears a shirt that says, "Thanos only snapped women back to the kitchen?" or something like that, maybe? The fucking world would end.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 03:21 AM
1

I'm willing to bet more progressive baby boomers are more likely to take an online survey from King's College.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 03:14 AM
8

I hear you. And I agree with other posters to stay out of he comments, BUT I will note that the texts of the articles themselves often contain misandrist quotes from feminist "experts," reported as objective facts. Incidentally, I haven't seen any coverage of the survey which you're referring to which asserts that Gen Z men have more conservative opinions to gender roles than Boomer men which also reports that Gen Z women in the survey ALSO had significantly more "conservative" opinions than Boo…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 12:01 AM
3

"But every single appointment treating the man as though he's some sort of abuser or human trafficker?" Remembering you're not a trafficker or abuser would require them to keep an accurate record of that and then read it, which you're lucky if they remember your medicine allergies or keep straight what test results go with you.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:09 PM
5

Because social media strongly reinforces their delusions for clicks.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 12:32 AM
9

It is, in fact, sexist, to hate 50% of the people on earth, based on a sample size of "men she has dated and been attracted to ..." ... which she admits is what she's doing. That's pretty much the definition of any kind of ---ism. As other commenters have noted, the rationalization of "men enact policies that take away our rights" ignores and absolves the multitudes of women who voted or otherwise support those same policies. (Unless you live in Afghanistan or Somalia or Vatican City ...) The dr…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 05:35 PM
12

Many a time, I have challenged a feminist: why I am, as a man who voted against Trump three times, MORE responsible for "all of this" than a woman who voted FOR him three times? Almost 45% of women in the US who voted, voted for DJT. (52% of white women did). I have asked, countless times, why do you expect me to talk other men out of misogyny/patriarchy (even though it may benefit them), but you don't hold yourself responsible for failing to talk other women out of misogyny/patriarchy (even tho…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 05:24 PM
10

Ohhh, but we're all friends in the Man Club where we give back slaps to the 1% and congratulate them on their misogyny, don't you know?
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 05:08 PM
6

I do not view this post as being what this sub is for.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:31 PM
34

I honestly don't have a problem with it either, as long as there's adequate suitable space for men. If anything, it should keep the people inclined to accuse a man of something away from men.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:28 PM
2

I defy anyone EVER to find something on the deepest recesses of the so-called Manosphere which jokes about maiming women, which has 1 MILLION likes, and a comment further specifically "joking" about violence to human "females"--- just to be clear-- with 180,000+ likes. Between 2020 to 2023, TAYLOR SWIFT had SIX posts on X that surpassed 1 million likes. That's it. Some random bitter woman joking about male genital mutilation can do early 2020s Taylor Swift social media numbers. THAT'S how normal…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 03:39 AM
2

Lack of awareness for women's reproductive issues is a fair candidate for a third point ... it's hard to strictly compare though, because biologically women can just have more problems than men, so I didn't include that because it's tough to compare ... and I do believe it's improving, though only in about the last 10-15 years. Still, I'd concede that point.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/26 03:24 AM
4

You used "female" as an adjective to describe "female President", which is a correct distinguisher, in context. But when referring to groups of people generally, using nouns, you used "women" vs. "males". "Women" as a noun, describes humans. "Males" as a noun describes male animals (unless used in certain clinical contexts--- which was not the case, given the parallel use of "women").
/r/MensRights01/03/26 03:19 AM
6

r/womenandmales
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:01 AM
4

There were MANY women besides Maxwell who assisted Epstein in recruitment and coordination, including Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross, Nadia Marcinkova, Haley Robson. Then there are the numerous women like Pamela Bondi, who have built their careers on protecting the people in the Epstein files. Then there are the wives, girlfriends, and associates of the men who were probable clients, like Howard Lutnick's wife, or, presumably, Melania, who seemingly had to have been at least complicit …
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 11:22 AM
19

374 men died protesting for Women's Rights in Iran in December 2022 alone Against an ACTUAL patriarchy
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 11:48 PM
17

He literally could not have done it without support from many, many women.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 11:46 PM
13

I think by every possible measure--- with two exceptions (the legality of abortion in the United States and the rate of childbirth complications) the world has unequivocally, dramatically improved, steadily for women in the last 30 years ... 60 years ... 100 years ... 150 years ... The only ways in which the world has gotten worse affect both sexes in the same way, or men more. (With those two exceptions above, which the first of which is hardly even something all women agree on.) I don't know h…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 11:45 PM
4

There are young women who genuinely believe that women were literally men's property until the 1970s. When---other than actual slavery--- that was never generally true in, at least, the US or British Commonwealth colonies. Even the closest thing to it---coverture---where a woman's property was "folded into" the marital estate on marriage---was abolished in most US states throughout the 1840s to 1870s. It's really not worth the effort because they do not listen to reason, but I've thought about m…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 01:50 AM
3

You can tell how much women disapprove of all this, by how all the men ruling the world and ruining everything are always single and sexless. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 10:12 PM
18

It's a performative in-group signifier, used by highly online women to demonstrate to other women that they, too, express disdain for men using the proper code.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 02:26 AM
62

The fact that the average man will desire, be attracted to, and romantically love the average woman, while most likely never receiving that back, is one of the hardest truths in life, which I wish I had known much earlier ... and is presently one of the major downfalls of our society.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:57 PM
13

Extremely well put. Yesterday, I saw a series of comments in response to the case of Corbie Jean Walpole BURNING Jake Loader to death for an alleged misogynist comment in May of last year ... ... in which dozens and dozens of women were joking about this guy being horrifically murdered ... Including: "Why didn't he just say no?" --- 278 THOUSAND likes. "Was he wearing something flammable?" -- 587 THOUSAND likes. KillAllMen and MenAreTrash had/have MILLIONS of likes and shares, and dozens if not …
/r/MensRights23/02/26 04:46 PM
22

"Was he wearing something flammable"? has 587 THOUSAND likes!?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 11:47 PM
3

One of the hardest truths in life.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:16 PM
16

Wow, this would never get printed in 2026. Especially if #6 was included.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 11:50 PM
14

It's definitely full-on misanthropic.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/02/26 11:34 PM
21

Quite possibly the sickest and most nihilistic thing I've ever heard.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/02/26 05:12 PM
2

assault-fact-sheet.pdf https://share.google/LxBo46qHD7NgHjYvb From an analysis of the FBI incident based reporting system by the Council for Criminal Justice ... Halfway down first page: "Rape and sexual assault decreased 56% from 1993 to 2022." Note IPV decreased 84% from 1995 to 2021. However, despite what I said above, quoting this will do no good, because when feminists claim 80-90% of women have been sexually assaulted, they use ridiculously overbroad definitions. For example, they consider…
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:33 AM
8

The platforms wouldn't even leave up most of the comments women make against men, if you gender reversed them. Within the last few hours, I saw a ragebait NYT article about female tortoises "jumping" (or more accurately, falling) off cliffs to avoid sexually overaggressive male tortoises, and 99%+ of the comments were obviously misandry, including: "Why don't they push the males off cliffs, like I would!" "At least we can be like female spiders and praying mantises and bite their ****ing heads o…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 10:53 PM
12

Has anyone in an online thread in the last, say 10 years, actually posted "what was she wearing?" in response to a report of a sexual assault on a woman? That's one of their go to "ironic turnabout comments," including one of the most common expansions of the ***ing Bear Meme---"at least they won't ask what I was wearing if I get mauled by a bear!"---but has anyone actually seen someone say this?? *(I always want to say ... btw, they definitely will ask what you were wearing if you get mauled by…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 10:41 PM
16

I want to make sure people know: There were MANY women besides Maxwell who assisted Epstein in recruitment and coordination, including Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross Nadia Marcinkova, Haley Robson. Then there are the numerous women like Pamela Bondi, who have built their careers on protecting the people in the Epstein files. Then there are the scores of women who benefited from access to Epstein's network, even if they weren't directly abusing children, even after he was exposed as a p…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 09:08 PM
10

There were MANY women besides Maxwell who assisted Epstein in recruitment and coordination, including Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross Nadia Marcinkova, Haley Robson. Many of these women were given immunity for cooperating against him ... though it's unclear how much they ever really did. Then there are the numerous women like Pamela Bondi, who have built their careers on protecting the people in the Epstein files. Then there are the scores of women who benefited from access to Epstein's…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 09:04 PM
16

There were MANY women besides Maxwell who assisted Epstein in recruitment and coordination, including Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross Nadia Marcinkova, Haley Robson. Then there are the numerous women like Pamela Bondi, who have built their careers on protecting the people in the Epstein files. Then there are the scores of women who benefited from access to Epstein's network, even if they weren't directly abusing children, even after he was exposed as a pedophile trafficker, like former …
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 09:01 PM
15

I dare someone to say back to one of these women, "the boss babe/cat lady/childfree influencer movement is society's sign that it's time for those particular women's bloodlines to die out ..." and then document the hellstorm you'd receive back. [I don't agree with that sentiment--- I'm just observing the double standard by which these supposed feminists have the blackest of Black Pill outlooks---a person's worth is measured by their ability to reproduce---when talking about men. Measure a woman …
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 08:50 PM
30

Tell them, here's a statistic for you: sexual assault has decreased more than 50% in the last 30 years. So if you want to stand on statistics, are you prepared to concede the last two generations of men, in general, have been drastically less violent and/or misogynist than ever before?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:44 AM
8

Great analogy. The Nazis used mushrooms though, in Der Giftpilz.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:39 AM
22

Lumping sexual harassment and assault together is already a deliberately misleading use of statistics. Getting wolf-whistled at one single time in one's lifetime should not be statistically equated with aggravated indecent assault. Doing so renders these types of quotes meaningless.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:28 AM
35

Imagine the lack of self-awareness it takes for one to write all that, and think that one is "emotionally regulated" and "kind and gentle" oneself.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/02/26 10:57 PM
10

When they cite these surveys (there's another one as well, they cite out of Australia) ... which supposedly say that "1 out of 3 college men say they'd rape a woman if there were no consequences ..." there are some important things to understand about how dishonest they are with statistics, including with how they are reported AND how they are gathered ... ... including the sample not being representative of the general population, the small sample size, and the confusing nature of the question …
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/26 12:22 PM
24

I honestly don't really mind the first slide that much, as it is tough to psychologically grapple with the fact that the world does actually appear to be run by a cabal of pedophiles. It does irritate me significantly that these women somehow think that ordinary men who will never be within 1000 ft of a billionaire are somehow more morally responsible for those men's actions than the ACTUAL significant number of women who directly helped them. (Not just Ghislaine Maxwell, but also numerous other…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 09:40 PM
5

Thoughts: (1) I don't blame the OOP, in that there are women who have grown up with VERY real and significant trauma and have great difficulty forming attachments or finding security because of experiences that are not their fault. What sucks is that these people need to be talking about that in a safe setting, where a shrewd, wise person is telling them, "yes, you have to be careful, but you can find stable, nice, reliable people in the world, regardless of your past misfortunes"--- not other w…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 04:28 PM
17

These are (roughly) the same people who also tell anyone who even slightly disagrees with them, "men need to be even lonelier" ... and "it's your personality, not your appearance" because Women Are Wonderful and don't care about superficial things like physical attractiveness.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 08:52 PM
3

I independently just saw this person (designmom) today, being quoted by another woman on Facebook, so she seems to be exploding. (I think probably some type of instigator/psyop, honestly.) Regardless, yes, it is very disturbing that so many women swallow this tripe whole, and virtually none disclaim, disavow, or contradict it (yet say "it's all men!" because men supposedly don't stand up to other sexist men). In the post I saw, (designmom) was asserting that evolutionary science proves that male…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:28 AM
3

Same here.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:45 AM
3

Sexual assault % and suicide "attempt" rates are irrelevant Red Herring. Just like "Not all men, but always a man" is, itself, a Red Herring, to create a diversion away from the assertion that it's wrong to say that something is all men if it's not.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 12:27 AM
2

You understand that "mistaken identity" is still a false accusation, right? AND that would be more than 25 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 12:23 AM
87

It's absolutely misandry. First of all, it's a lie. Second of all, it's only used in the context of excusing and deflecting from being called out for some previously stated misandrist generality, to which someone has objected with "not all men ..." (Or, more recently, it has become so cliche to use in that fashion, they'll say it preemptively.) Ex. "Men rape us and kill us ...!" "Not all men!" "Not all men, but always a man." In this simplified example, it is misandric because (1) it negates the…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:55 AM
13

It's true. It's the power that corrupts, not chromosomes or skin color.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/26 11:32 PM
1

"I don't even think I can explain what isolation felt like growing up as the lone weirdo in your town or suburb, waiting to run away to the big city as soon as you could and never looking back" I'd tell OP to listen to "Subdivisions" by Rush ... from 1982.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 02:43 AM
8

I'm mostly being rhetorical, but how does someone convince himself that "she acknowledges me as one of the good ones" if she wants to abort your son? Again, I'm being rhetorical ... I know this stuff is out there, and some of its real, but it seems so unreal, it's just so ludicrous that this is tolerated by anyone ... society, the platforms ... people who know these women ... etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/26 10:00 PM
6

I'll bet if you did some type of study, "picture a stereotypical trust fund kid," the average person would picture a man ... even though it should be equally likely to be a woman ....
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:24 PM
15

I just read a glowing human interest piece about a young woman who, after college, decided to "take a few years off," live in a van and travel from national park to national park to go rock climbing. (It was completely silent on how she was funding this.) The article was effusively glowing in tone, like, treating her almost as a kind of guru about "what she learned in nature." I just kept thinking ... if this was a man, this would be no article. He would be treated as a bum. (Probably viewed as …
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:21 PM
21

How are any men willing to have sex with these women in the first place!?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/26 06:00 PM
27

It's weird that people have never heard of something as basic as Aesop's Fables's The Boy Who Cried Wolf. If one calls ALL sexually referential behavior "rapey," then one damages one's own credibility when one talks about actual rape ....
/r/MensRights05/02/26 03:44 PM
6

My favorite is ... when I ask the question, in response to "it's OK to hate all men, because they don't do enough to stop other men from being misogynist" ... other variations are, "we all participate in rape culture" or "we all benefit from patriarchy." My response: "In the United States, more than half of all the white women who voted, voted for well-known misogynist Donald J. Trump, over a woman. So ... why should I be more able to get other men to give up misogyny (even though it may benefit…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/26 05:06 PM
5

I despair at the future of this society, truly. Some of these comments have upwards of 50 THOUSAND likes! Where are the "good women?" Where are the platforms, in this, monetizing literal calls for genocide? (And, in the long run, omnicide?) As an example of the standard to which feminists purport to hold men, here's the response from a feminist I was having a painful back and forth with just yesterday: "You [her referring to me] claimed that it’s not right to treat all men like it’s all of them …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/26 04:42 PM
-18

I'm not sure this is that you're saying, but to be clear: the women of Iran don't deserve to be actually oppressed, because the women of the West don't want to acknowledge that the men of Iran sacrificed for their women.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 03:40 PM
4

I realize depression is a female side effect as well, but the male pill research I'm referring to involved at least one suicide and several severe cases in a small group. It was a reasonable thing to do to halt that study. It should not be framed as "Well, we women put up with depression, men are just fragile" like it has been.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:03 PM
10

I had read that the side effects things was partially true, for a previous test pill, but the side effect was intense depression to the point of suicide. Which of course, feminists trivialize.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:36 AM
1

I'm in my mid-40s, and it's crazy unhealthy for me. But I can't even begin to imagine how bad it is for young men and teen boys still trying to learn how to relate to women at all. And it's so prevalent, they have to see it.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:32 AM
1

I have really become a lot more depressed, basically since the "bear meme" ... which unfortunately coincided with problems in my marriage ... where I realized ... after being raised as a "sensitive 90s guy" elder millennial ... that if you were nice, and emotionally mature, and respectful to women, they would like you ... and being taught that women aren't as superficial as men, and are looking for stability and loyalty and kindness in a partner ... ... when I realized that is all mostly not tru…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:28 AM
1

Imagine George Lucas wearing a t-shirt at a major event that was a quote from someone who advocated for women to be slaves ... and imagine how that would go over ... and then think about the double standard now at work in the world.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 06:27 AM
5

Looks like AI ... or can a real human be that dead-eyed?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 07:24 PM
3

I'm shocked, honestly.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 06:12 PM
11

Seems very much like this landlord should have the sense, in this day and age, to be very worried about some type of false report he's getting himself into, in this situation.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 09:24 PM
3

All I can say is, be very wary of media coverage of studies or analyses which say things like, "the expert appraisal showed that girls are more affected than boys by all these effects" ... ... but doesn't actually say HOW they are more affected, or HOW much more.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 12:46 AM
39

She's right about one thing: she is mentally ill.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/26 12:31 AM
6

Assuming, for the sake of argument, misogyny is "worse" than misandry, it is irrelevant. It isn't a contest. A greater evil does not make a lesser evil nonexistent. Would your sister tell an Asian person in a racist white area that they weren't really the subject of bullying or other discrimination because black people are treated worse? (Maybe she would--- but she'd be wrong!) Sexism, in general is wrong. If a person is unwilling to accept that, they are wrong and are not "liberal" in any sense…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/26 12:06 AM
6

I don't agree about generalizing women, either. Some women do have a great sense of fairness. ("Feminist" ... I would accept as a chosen ideology, as opposed to an unchosen biological status. )
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/26 12:00 AM
7

I'm sad I have to agree with someone who's screenname is "unclepoondaddy ..." (second slide) Seriously, of all the misandrist tropes, the one I see most often and therefore probably hate the most is some variation on the Margaret Atwood quote paraphrase, "Misogyny kills women, but misandry just laughs at men" It's not even technically true. But let's suppose it is ... so!? Imagine an Asian boy in rural America saying to an authority figure, "Kids at school were making fun of my eyes!" --- snd th…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 07:08 PM
6

I often complain about how frustrated I am that women generally don't stick up for men, especially online, but I guess I kind of get it that when they do, other women gang up on her and bully her so badly it would certainly serve as a deterrent most of the time.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 02:32 PM
5

We don't know what she considers to be a "6 or 7" though ... Although I agree, compared to the average post on this sub, it's a bit weak in misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/26 02:22 AM
5

So the consensus was ... they can't quite agree in what type of bigotry they want to engage, but they can mostly agree some type of bigotry is acceptable? Yeah, I guess that tracks.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/26 02:20 AM
15

I actually almost agree that a straight man should take a psych eval to be on Instagram ... because it's so absurdly misandrist that you'd better be very mentally stable as a man to be able to handle it ....
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 09:43 PM
3

China and many individual US states (including those with high populations such as Illinois and Pennsylvania). However, I was incorrect, sex-selective abortion is apparently not illegal in the UK, California, or New York, so what I said about "vast majority" is not accurate. It may not be a majority at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 03:19 AM
2

I saw this post also, or a very similar one. It made me think how, if a man wrote something like, "I went into Lowes (or Home Depot) to order [whatever] and you know who they sent to help me? A girl! Oh man, I knew I'd really be in for it then." I'm sure there are some men who would think something like that. But they would go viral on social media for (correctly) being ridiculed and mocked into oblivion as an absolute Cro-Magnon ... not for being overwhelmingly supported by the mob.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 03:02 AM
8

Both of which are evil, but illegal in the vast majority of countries and exceedingly rare in the West. Historic prominent feminists such as Sally Milly Gearhart and numerous modern feminists on Reddit and many other social media also actively advocate for sex selective abortion against males, including with the hashtag AbortMaleFetuses and the meme, "Is it a girl or an abortion?" So if they mean misogyny kills via sex selective abortions, then they should logically concede (but would not) that …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 02:51 AM
2

She would say, probably tepidly, "he's one of the rare good ones" ... but the question remains, why are men who date women like this do foolish they don't see the "for now" coming to bite them some day?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 02:40 AM
13

Thank you for the information. I agree that there does seem to be a great deal of people who think bodyshaming men and boys has no adverse effect on society. (I think it's under the general umbrella of the Margaret Atwood, "Men are afraid women are going to laugh at that, women are afraid men will kill them" ... so women therefore get a free pass for male-on-female bullying ... ) I don't know how anyone CAN think that, knowing the Black Pill ideology exists ... but ... people still do ...
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/26 10:10 PM
1

Must be really nice to be her boyfriend, when she ultimately says " ... even as someone who has a preference for them [men], I simply don't care about them for the most part."
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 02:27 AM
9

That still doesn't make the statement in the OOP true.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/26 11:28 PM
2

I appreciate what you're saying and I'm sorry you're getting downvoted, but surely you must realize how incredibly rare you are, if you are a feminist calling out misandry? I truly have NEVER seen a self-described feminist push back on misandry. I'm not saying you do not. I believe you. But you are in such an extreme minority, regardless of the "definition" of feminism, it's hard to take a claim to support of "equality" seriously. Here's an anecdote from about 9 months ago: personal anecdote fro…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/26 12:11 AM
6

Oh, I've done this one before! In response to this question, on a feminist page, I was told, "women can tell [who the rapists are], and if men can't [and don't shame them enough] it just shows how willfully blind they are" To which I said, "I thought the whole premise of the 'bear meme' was that women 'just CAN'T tell'?" Which was met by various forms of vulgarity.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 10:51 PM
5

I can't even tell what they're trying to say.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 10:39 PM
8

As I have said before, Zawn Villanes is a hypocrite, grifter, and all around intellectually bankrupt and fundamentally dishonest and hateful person, who represents the exact other side of the same coin as people like Andrew Tate, and it's disgusting that people don't recognize that. Just in this "article" she supports her claim that that marital rape is still common by linking to her OWN unscientific survey; and continues to spread the "1 out of 5 husbands abandon their sick wives" myth, despite…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 06:33 PM
5

I used to draw a distinction between "radical feminism" and "feminism" myself, until, in the last 8-10 years, and especially since KillAllMen, MenAreTrash, and the Bear Meme, I noticed how, despite feminists saying "they're about equality" they will NEVER renounce, disclaim, or disassociate from women (including self-espoused feminists) who say things like in this OP. Not only do I guarantee that there is not a single feminist who wrote in response to the comment above, "it's wrong to hate all m…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 11:53 AM
13

I don't know how a man marries someone who says she hates the broad class of human being which he belongs to. How could you not think ... "right now, I'm 'one of the only good ones'---but will it stay that way, over time, as familiarity breeds contempt?" Or even worse--- how could you not have some doubt--- maybe she doesn't even think I'm truly "a good one" and is just using me for some resource? (Economic support, emotional support, social prestige, etc)
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 02:57 AM
7

I'll tell you this much ... 15-20 years ago, I would have told you I was pro-feminist I've NEVER seen a video of Andrew Tate ... just a few minutes of Jordan Peterson. Never been to a MTGOW page or followed any "manosphere" YouTube. What turned me "anti-feminist" (NOT anti-equality, not anti-women) ... was reading "feminists" own words here and on Instagram and on TikTok ... especially r/ Feminism, TwoXchromosomes, and AskWomen ...
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 12:47 AM
19

There was another recent post about extremely disturbing crap a "trauma therapist" was posting. These are supposedly licensed professionals. They should be policing each other much more than they appear to be
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 12:17 AM
35

Many of them openly say they hate us. But it's Good when they do it.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 12:15 AM
31

Honestly, that's what I thought, too. There were probably comments arguing with her, "No, it ISN'T wrong!" "And it can't be misandry, because misandry doesn't exist!"
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 09:44 PM
13

Anyone who does not accept the basic premise that it is morally and ethically wrong to make pejorative gross generalizations against a group of people based upon a physical status which they did not choose and cannot change is not suited to be any kind of "therapist," nor is someone with whom I have enough common ground to have a conversation.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 08:11 PM
2

I love feminists quoting a 15+ year old Cornish reality television involving 20 kids and cut to less than 4 hours long as if it's a major, peer-reviewed repeatable study across tens of thousands of people and multiple countries. I wonder if they think the Real World was literally real.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 01:55 AM
1

This is a good analysis.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 01:49 AM
13

A few thoughts ... (may edit to add more): (1) This is pretty intense misandry, even for a repost on this page ... it's crazy to me that even a few hundred people think this is OK, to be this committed to hating a (very) broad group of your fellow human beings. I'm not SURPRISED. But it's still crazy to wrap my head around. I still blame social media platforms for tolerating this crap. If I read this as a teenager, struggling with normal stuff like "I'm always very respectful to girls and seem l…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/26 11:31 PM
8

Does anyone even claim the "world" is misandrist? The countries/societies exhibited by those numbered questions stand in sharp contrast to countries like US/UK, and actually undermines the point that modern western nations are "Patriarchies." If you're going to run down that list of questions to say, "does the world have extreme misogyny in it?"--- and the answer is going to be "yes"--- then can you run down that list for the global "West"--- and when the answers are all, "no, this is NOT true o…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 06:45 PM
6

There is some really dark, disgusting things on the "side" of misogyny ... but what makes me really despair over human nature, is the folks on the "other side" (liberal, or left, if you will)--- who position themselves as being kind and empathetic and tolerant ... ... who think this is OK. Just today, I was told by a woman on a Facebook post who said all kinds of crazy, hateful things, that she was trying to "match my disrespectful energy" in my first comment to her. My first comment to her: "Gr…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 05:35 PM
6

"The men noticed her firm buttocks like she had grape fruits in her hip pockets; the great rope of black hair swinging to her waist and unraveling in the wind like a plume; then her pugnacious breasts trying to bore holes in her shirt." -- introductory description of the main character from "Their Eyes Were Watching God" by the very famously female Zora Neale Hurston
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 05:08 PM
2

It's not a real statistic at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 09:05 PM
3

Maybe, I'm being pedantic, but as stated "over 90% of the violence in our society is caused by men" contains at least two definitional errors: What is "violence" and what is "caused"? (You could even argue "what is 'our society'?") As to "violence": What qualifies as violence? If they mean literally all forms of physical violence, of any kind, everywhere, that is not possible to measure or meaningful. (Ex. gridiron football, boxing, and ice hockey are still extremely violent and primarily "cause…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 06:50 PM
2

Have you ever heard a feminist--- since feminism is all about "equality," right---complain that about 80% of publishing editors are female, and therefore there should be some DEI action to make sure women don't get to overwhelmingly gate-keep what gets published? I guess that's not a "system" though. /s [I'm not even saying that's all due to misandry, btw ... just that if the situation was gender-flipped, misogyny would be absolutely assumed, and you'd hear about it constantly.]
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 04:03 AM
1

Ever hear someone who WASN'T a raging bigot of some type unironically use the phrase "putting someone in their place"?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:58 AM
2

You forgot "literally wishing men didn't exist" or "would disappear from the face of the earth" or proposing "why can't we just get rid of men?" etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:54 AM
8

And yet these women will become furiously mad at you for saying something like: "95+% of all slam dunks are made by men ... therefore it is safe to assume that the average man can slam dunk"
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:51 AM
3

I'm in a northern state in the US in a mountainous area and it's January and it was 50 degrees F just today. Her underlying point is wrong, but the analogy is also a really bad analogy.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:49 AM
13

Mushrooms are a dangerous analogy for them, since I've always thought their "bowl of poison skittles" and even the "Bear meme" are very close to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Giftpilz
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:46 AM
14

Facts don't lie: according to the General Social Survey (GSS), year after year, married women are significantly happier on average than single women. How can "my man" be a rare exception if that's true? (Not even getting into the cliche-at-this point, "90% of violence caused by men" argument ... which is (1) not true and (2) as logically sound as ... 90%+ of slam dunks are made by men; therefore, most men can slam dunk")
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 03:44 AM
3

I can promise you, they'll say far more foul things than that.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/26 02:43 AM
2

I actually had an online feminist respond to me, recently making your very point ("why would men be responsible for talking other men out of misogyny even though it may benefit them, when you can't get other women to not be misogynist even though it hurts them?")---that "it's harder for women to overcome internalized misogyny than it is for men to overcome misogyny" and when I said "do you realize that kind of makes it sound like you're saying women are intellectually weaker than men?" I was met…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/26 05:10 AM
2

It's kind of like how ... feminists assume that when quoting the very low rape conviction statistics, that the justice system is incompetent or biased, or both, and therefore it can be assumed there are many, many more rapes than those which lead to convictions in court ... ... but all of sudden when considering the low numbers of convictions for false reports ... the system is now highly reliable, and we can assume that number is accurate.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/26 12:02 AM
12

Ohhh, a new one I haven't seen yet "being attracted to heterosexual men feels like being an emotional pedophile." I can't wait to see that plastered all over every thread, since they tend to repeat the same 5-10 cliches like mantras. They'll have to take out the word "often" though. A good misandrist ought to know you're not supposed to qualify you're hateful generalization at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/26 11:58 PM
10

This is AT LEAST as sick as anything the darkest recesses of the so-called manosphere churns out ... but you won't see a "Vox" or "Buzzfeed" article or Atlantic or New Yorker thinkpiece on "Why Are Women So Toxic?: The Strange Case of the Reaction to Margot Robbie as a Boy-Mom" or some crap like that .... And I remember when this happened in late 2024; it was HUGE. This sort of reaction was all over the internet.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 02:46 AM
10

To quote Michael Stipes quoting Brian Eno: "Withdrawal in disgust is not the same as apathy." (Otherwise, agreed.)
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 02:40 AM
4

"The book is written for the layman, but the page is not" Seriously? Wow. Sometimes I enjoy arguing, but even I would be embarrassed to engage in that type of sophistry instead of just admitting I was wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:36 PM
11

That's absolutely right. Do you know how shocking it would be to find, in an AP World Cultures textbook, [Some dude] wryly observed, 'There would be peace in the Middle East if we just used nuclear weapons to turn Israel and Palestine both to glass!" People wouldn't be like ... "oh, it's just an evocative hypothetical ..." They'd be saying WTF is this comment doing here!? But no, this is publishable, because it's misandry, so it's OK.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:15 PM
5

It absolutely is written for the layman. This is an introductory level AP textbook, approved by the College Board. If it's for an AP class, it's for high school students. High school students are laypeople.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:09 PM
1

Go to any page which features Blue's cartoons (which are extremely popular) and find me feminists saying, "you do not represent us." I guarantee they are in the most extreme minority, and will be getting down voted and bullied and blasted into oblivion. In fact----go post this cartoon on a major Feminist subreddit right here in Reddit, with the caption: "This person is shitty and does not represent feminism." I would bet you everything I make in a month you will be down voted into oblivion, it'l…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:23 PM
2

Make sure to save this, for the next time an online feminist writes, "Actually, male loneliness needs to be even higher" or "love that male loneliness epidemic"--- ---oh, so you feminists SUPPORT The Patriarchy?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:32 AM
9

"(Male) loneliness = while not a direct benefit this is largely caused by a socal system designed for prioritising female needs. See dating for an example." I have often pointed out: If I mow the lawn and clean the house and watch the kids while my wife goes on a girl's spa trip or winery tour with her friends, society says she's engaging in much needed self care. If she mows the lawn (at all) and cleans the house and watches the kids while I would hypothetically watch football or play D&D with …
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:22 AM
4

I'm getting sick of arguing with women online who say things like, "Feminists aren't saying all men are rapists!" And I say, "They literally are." "You can't name one!" "Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers." - Andrea Dworkin Then what? "She's not True Feminist"? Then cast her out. Renounce her. If I was part of a movement and didn't want to be associated with literal psychopaths, I'd do everything I could to make sure it was clear that we kicked the psychopaths out.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:18 AM
1

I keep saying: society is always going to have depraved and sick people. We have gone wrong by (anti)-social media not just tolerating, but platforming and spreading these toxic attitudes like the mind viruses they are.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:13 AM
2

Last slide, fucking quoting Valerie Solanas who shot Andy Warhol three times and Mario Amaya (and who only did three years in prison for it!). Feminism has truly made me understand why religion developed the concept of orthodoxy and heresy; and why revolutionary groups are obsessed with purges. You can't have people like that in your movement and not root them out in some way (preferably not burning at the stake---but at least renounce them!), or else people can say "this is what radical feminis…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 04:07 AM
3

Just be glad it only has one like. I'm actually pleasantly surprised.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:40 AM
2

Thank you for context. My thoughts: (1) I feel sorry for this person ... but: (2) so called "social media" is inherently wrong and theoretically flawed for platforming these kinds of ravings ... Like ....40 years ago, we as a society would have the sense to know that giving, say, a psych ward a 24/7 cable access show would have negative mental health consequences for all of society; and (3) I'm going to play armchair psychologist and opine that it does not improve my opinion of therapy that this…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:37 AM
3

They like talking about the "chat room talking about tips on raping women in the 77,000 Telegram accounts uncovered in the Gisele Pelicot case," too. They don't like talking about: (1) it wasn't " a chat room," it was many, many chat threads, all together, basically every one in the world which law enforcement could find; (2) the media quotes not 77,000 but "as many as 77,000"--- it's not clear how many it was; (3) it's not 77,000 "men," it's 77,000 "accounts" (need anyone explain how and why th…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:17 AM
8

In fact, personal noise alarm comes up when you Google for both men and women ... and pink and purple reflective vests come up when you Google for women. And this stupid "comic!"
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 02:50 AM
1

No True Scotsman
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 02:30 AM
3

And if they agree and are trash, why should we trust the opinion of trash? It's a pretty amazing paradox.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:58 PM
4

If you want to make them really mad, and you're talking to an American, pose the following: "A majority of white women in the US voted for Donald J Trump, noted misogynist, in 2024. So how can you expect me, as a man, to get other men to stop being misogynist (even though it may benefit them)--- when you can't get other women to stop being misogynist (even if it hurts them)?"
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:56 PM
4

I wish it was possible to just rub the last poster's face in the prior posts. More times than I can count on my hands, I've seen a woman, in a misandrist thread write some version of, "look, no one is saying we should hate all men ..." or " no one says all men are bad" --- or "I've never seen anyone saying literally all men" ... ... and another woman will write DIRECTLY in response to her: "I am, I do think we should hate all men" or "actually, all men are trash." When I see it, I will tag or li…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:53 PM
1

Her stance on this---like every other issue she cartoons about--- is always "men [do this bad thing]" or "women [do this good or sympathetic thing]" It's never "some men." It's never "one of those men who ..." It's always framed as an absolute. SO--"focusing" on those who need to change ("those who are still shitty") would be NOT painting with such a broad brush. Focusing on those who are "still shitty" would be presenting the issue as, for example: "Don't be one of those guys who makes his wife…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:43 PM
1

I'm not the one making gross generalizations. People like "Blue" are.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:14 PM
6

Fun fact for anyone who doesn't know: "The Future Is Female" quote originates from feminist ideologue Sally Miller Gearhart, who also wrote and believed: "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." ie literal genocide of men through sex selective abortion and IVF Don't let them ever tell you "it's about equality." They know it's not.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 05:14 PM
9

Don't give us half the story, lol! You're not going to still go to her, are you? Are you going to let her know why? Maybe give a review?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 05:10 PM
1

If a man said, "I'm not an incel, I had sex with a wood nymph just the other day, " he'd be involuntarily medicated, if not committed ....
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 08:53 PM
10

They are truly the other side of the same debased coin. Just not as "successful."
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 08:48 PM
17

My favorite part is: it's obviously hateful, but it also makes no sense. Like, this woman references her mother-in-law teaching her son well (in reference to her husband) ... so the woman isn't trying to "get picked" ... she is "picked." It's like when they call a married father of four "incel" or some nonsense like that. It is telling though, as much as they expect all men to sacrifice themselves to confront misogyny, and as much as they talk about The Patriarchy being enforced through social p…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 08:47 PM
15

I mean ... it's nice to see a woman actually calling this crap out, but she still gets like 6 to 10 likes vs 104 to 485 likes on the comments ... A majority of women seem to agree with this crap. It really gets me down, especially during the holidays ... I personally bought and paid for every Christmas present for our kids, wrapped them, hid them, set them out under the tree ... bought and cooked the food for Christmas dinner ... put up the Christmas tree and outside decorations ... I know at le…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 08:37 PM
2

Yeah, I'm not interested in stuff like NASCAR or ATVs or shooting or hunting. The vast majority of other men in my area are. So I'm not particularly interested in being friends with the majority of other men I know or encounter, because I don't have a lot of interests in common with them, so ... I guess that means I ... (checks notes) "don't respect them as other human beings." Since that's apparently what it means to not want to be friends with them. Not wanting to go out of my way to privately…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/25 12:45 AM
9

Use of the word "violently" in contexts like this always makes me wonder if the people who write this stuff somehow never heard of the Boy Who Cried Wolf.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/25 12:35 AM
3

They're more angry at pro-choice men than they are at Amy Comey Barrett; or the tens of millions of women who voted for the person who appointed her ...or the female senators who approved the appointment. It truly tells you something.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/25 11:02 PM
7

People who really believed in equality wouldn't be offended by the word "egalitarian," which feminists are.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/25 01:51 PM
10

For anyone who encounters feminists lying about this issue: "Total life expectancy (TLE) for married women was 21.1 years, 1.5 years longer than unmarried women ...." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/#:~:text=Similarly%2C%20at%2065%20years%2C%20TLE%20for%20married,Such%20marriage%20protection%20effects%20decreased%20with%20age "For women, age-adjusted death rates for married women aged 25 and over were the lowest of all marital status groups ..." https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hes…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 10:23 PM
9

I agree that the mere fact that married women live longer on average than single women, that doesn't mean marriage is inherently "good". But that is us being intellectually honest--- which the woman who wrote this post is not willing to be, by lying in the first place. For anyone who encounters feminists lying about this issue: "Total life expectancy (TLE) for married women was 21.1 years, 1.5 years longer than unmarried women ...." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/#:~:text=Simil…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 10:19 PM
14

Does makeup prevent you from getting sunburnt, or keep the sun out of your eyes?
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 06:42 PM
17

I can't even begin to describe how hateful and misandrist Zawn Villines is. And she's quite popular and quoted by mainstream media (including the Today show) despite being an obvious "grifter" (as they would call an equivalent "manosphere"" person). She's married to civil rights attorney Jeff Filipovits, who is apparently so desperate to present as a "feminist ally" that he's willing to stay married to someone who writes things like, in this article, "your partner isn't entitled to happiness." T…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 12:50 AM
2

As to "gender based crime" and "rape culture" --- I have asked feminists many times: " what % of a demographic population has to be perpetrators of an act for you feel comfortable generalizing all members based on that act? Or, to put it another way, when will we have reached a point when the % is low enough that you say, "this is it, The Patriarchy or Rape Culture is over!" How do we know when we have reached the promised land?" They will not answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 03:08 AM
2

So I recently became aware of the outspoken and apparently highly popular social media feminist Zawn Villines, and was profoundly depressed at reading the following, which I think speaks to your point: "It doesn’t matter if he’s a nice guy, a feminist, or an ally. If he’s a man in a patriarchy, he poses a theoretical threat—even if he never actually becomes threatening. Simple mindfulness of this fact could help women better weigh the risks and benefits of their relationships with men. I include…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 02:54 AM
1

"This is why I tell women that the safest option is not to date men. Yet I’m a heterosexual-presenting woman very happily married to a man. People sometimes ask me if I think that’s hypocritical. That’s for them to judge, not me." The answer is "yes." Yes, she's a hypocrite. And a bad wife. EDIT: Oh, and she locks her comments to only paid subscribers, too! Of course. Of course. EDIT 2: I'm sorry, I find this one really upsetting for some reason: Liberating Motherhoo "It doesn’t matter if he’s a…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/25 10:09 PM
18

I'm not saying the black pill is healthy ... but it's easy to see where it came from.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 12:12 PM
5

I can't even begin to wade through all that toxic sludge. But ... As to the "number one cause of death of pregnant women being murder at the hands of the father": as far as I can tell, this is an outrageous lie, told by feminists so often LLM chatbots will parrot it. There are no apparent actual numbers to back it: As to obstetric causes: 817 maternal deaths from pregnancy related causes (rate of 22.3 per 100,000 live births), in US in 2022. As to homicide of pregnant women: data unclear, but th…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 11:31 PM
2

I'm all for nuance, but I am responding to your assertion that progressives usually don't care either way. That is not my observation at this time. It appears to me--in broad generalities---- that conservatives are overly concerned with advocating for motherhood, and progressives are overly disparaging of motherhood. It may be my algorithm, but I see FAR, FAR more (unchallenged) comments in the vein of: "No woman should ever bare some man's child! It literally ruins our lives and bodies! That's …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 07:43 PM
18

Right. Have any of us literally ever heard a woman say anything like what she said? I've seen women say, "I don't need no man" about 1000 times more often than some tepid version of "Many men are OK" ... and "I wish all men would disappear from the face of the Earth" about 100 times more ... I guess it's supposed to be some degree of hyperbole, but I'm in my mid-40s and I don't think I've EVER heard a woman say anything as remotely positive about men as ""I love men, they're so special and uniqu…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 04:45 AM
4

Here is an actual exchange from earlier today between myself and a self-professed feminist on another SubReddit: Feminist Redditor: "Why can't people just accept that if women actually have a choice in the matter, they will choose not to be mothers?" Me: "Women have had a choice for decades and decades if not longer. The major change correlating with the collapse of the birth rate is (1) access to birth control + (2) access to mass media, especially social media. If you replace social pressure t…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 04:35 AM
47

One of the most popular romance books/movies ever written ("The Notebook") includes the male protagonist being so oppressively demanding and clingy that he threatens to kill himself by jumping off a ferris wheel to get the female protagonist to go out with him. Is THAT what women actually want!?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/25 05:23 PM
52

More than 22,000+ likes for something a social media platform wouldn't even allow to stay posted if it was gender-reversed ....
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 11:16 PM
3

I agree with you that the "up to 70,000" language used in media has been very cagey ... and it's also often quoted by misandrists as "a chat group" but seems to have been numerous groups, possibly with that nebulous total ....
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 03:11 AM
5

To answer a few of those from my anecdotal experience: I am in my 40s, as an "elder millennial" ... have lived my whole life in the United States, in a conservative, middle class rural area. In my gifted class in elementary school, there were 7 girls and 1 boy (me). No one said, "where are the boys? Systemic sexism is at play!" No one cared. My senior advanced placement calculus and physics classes were 75-80% female. No one said, "where are the boys? Systemic sexism is at play!" No one cared. M…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 11:12 PM
5

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: these people are literally mentally ill---I truly blame the social media platforms for tolerating this crap. This would (rightfully) NOT be tolerated against any other demographic group.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 10:58 PM
4

Correct in every word.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/25 02:38 AM
1

Not "supposed to, " no---but I don't know what else to call the genre of social media posts which are meant to stoke resentment, or even hatred, for the opposite gender, which have become all too prevalent.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/12/25 02:22 AM
11

I don't even see that many of them say they're against The Patriarchy, not men, anymore. They've brainwashed the mainstream and normalized misandry enough now they just say they do hate men, but it's justified. Every now and then you'll have one of the ones who still cares about appearances say something like, "I'm not saying hating men is right, but it's understandable in the context of The Patriarchy."
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 01:53 AM
6

"Stop giving birth to males" seems to be big right now. Just seeing how far they can push misandry, and, in turn the Gender War. I partially believe a lot of this is truly psyops and hostile foreign power influences.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 01:50 AM
4

Except they just won't answer.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 01:47 AM
9

I couldn't agree with you more. I have NEVER seen a supposed mainstream feminist confront a supposed radical feminist and say, "That does not represent us." Every one of the following comments is something I have seen many, many times online ... comments with thousands+ likes and shares: SN, Sylvia Plath Tomato Soup: "Feminism didn't teach me to hate men, I have hated men all my life, feminism taught me I was right" SN, The Profane Feminist: "I hate men. And no, I won't apologize or make qualifi…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/25 03:49 AM
13

I don't think it generally gets taken down. I report stuff like this on Facebook and Instagram very frequently, and they never take it down on the first report, and maybe like 20-25% on appeal. As an example, a few months ago: A self-described feminist on Andrea Berghoff's page on Instagram, who identified herself as "Giulia Tofana" (Google if you don't know)-- claimed to be a medical doctor. I said: "I would not want to be a man who had a doctor with that name on Instagram ... it implies you're…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/25 03:38 PM
8

That's what I have a big problem with, is the platforms allowing it. IF, in general, they took a completely, radically 100% free speech approach--- which virtually no mainstream platform can do, because they're businesses, and the whole thing will become nightmarish shit almost immediately--- then I suppose I could intellectually rationalize this kind of hate. BUT obviously they do not, and freely censure all kinds of hate. I have no problem with that, personally--- they're not the government, s…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/25 03:34 PM
7

I ask them: how much is "enough"? What exact percentage of evildoers is enough to justify blanket hatred of a target demographic? They won't answer.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 11:35 PM
3

I swear, if you read anything referencing the Patriarchy which people write online and replace it with "The Devil" or "The Illuminati," it would be equally intelligible and have the same meaning.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 02:15 AM
1

I read the entire press release in the link and it does not define "digital violence" at all in it.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 02:11 AM
11

I took a class just on The Iliad and The Odyssey in college, and it's been a while, but there were women in the class, and it was an elective, and they seemed to like it, so ....
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 01:16 AM
6

I can't imagine how depressing and angering it would be to be a man who had a wife or girlfriend or daughter, etc., who was raped or murdered and then be told "you benefit" from male violence.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/25 09:44 PM
27

I truly do not say this lightly, but at a certain point, all the violent fantasization these misandrists engage in really seems a little ... fetish-y.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/25 03:24 AM
22

Great. Now I know "thinspo" exists, which, as an old person, I previously did not. And here, as a man, it's my fault, even.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 09:26 PM
29

... accidentally admits in the last line, " ... the feminist movement is not liberating to my sex." I thought the party line is supposed to be "patriarchy hurts men, too" isn't it? So dismantling it "should" be liberating ... right?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 04:24 AM
3

Thank you for clarifying. Obviously, that was just an example to a much larger point but it's still important to be accurate, so thank you, again.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:18 AM
10

You are completely correct. That is why I put it in quotes.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 07:26 PM
10

You seem to be appearing in every thread, with the assertion that "misandrists avoid men." And yet here are again, proving your own self wrong. Everything about your statement is wrong, and is just the same old misandrist cliche talking points. Do you realize you're actually even downplaying a lot of misogyny, spouting the party line? Hypothetical man refuses to change diapers, so the mother has to do it: not "extremely violent". But still misogynist. Hypothetical man refuses to promote a female…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 12:23 PM
9

A lot of commenters are correct that misandry does cause all kinds of significant problems for men, which this post ignores ... but ... ... the first problem with this is that it assumes that solving problems is somehow a zero sum game. We would recognize someone as mentally unstable immediately, if they said, in seriousness: "Traffic accidents aren't a real problem. They don't almost wipe out an ethnic group like the Holocaust or destroy the world like nuclear war!" Or "I don't want to hear a t…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 04:34 AM
5

Going to a very small subreddit and harassing men trying to cope with misandry throughout society with made-up "facts" you can't substantiate is, by no stretch of the imagination, living "free of men" .... and certainly not reflective of a being happy and stress-free...
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 12:57 AM
3

I've only every seem online feminists talk about it, as a dig at men, as a group, to try to say being lonely is their fault. ("MEN NEED TO BE MORE LONELY!" "NO WONDER THERE'S A MALE LOSER EPIDEMIC!" etc. Regardless of whether "everyone is talking about it" or not, you do realize it (1) probably doesn't exist as a distinct phenomenon outside of general societal/human loneliness and (2) ... may I assume you have no source for your (bizarre) claim that women were lonely first, and men just copied t…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 02:54 AM
2

They may hate men, but the one thing they HATE even more is a woman who doesn't hate men, and speaks up about it. I'd go as far as to say that's a truism. It's almost funny. I very rarely see a woman contradict the mainline party line on a gender wars thread, but when they do, oh man, do they got dog piled even worse than any man who is contradicting them. It's the one thing that gives me hope, is that I can hope most women don't buy into this crap, they just don't want to get flamed by other wo…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 02:49 AM
4

So you may wish to believe.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 12:08 AM
4

The 4B Movement in South Korea is strongly linked with WOMAD, known for bullying gay men to suicide, directly endorsing and encouraging physical violence up to and including murder against men, and in at least one case, was directly linked to drugging and raping an Australian boy. I don't know that I'd really want to associate myself with it, if I were you ... even if it also didn't stand for the extinction of humanity on top of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 11:35 PM
8

It is so unironically sociopathic of the women who write articles like this and the many women who support them, to be sitting there, listening to their men pour their hearts out to them, as their closest confidantes, and be thinking: "This is such a waste of my time. I should be getting paid." And then also think they are abundantly empathetic. Sometimes I feel like I'm going crazy seeing this stuff. (And people say, just don't go to certain threads, or whatever, but it's mainstream! It's all o…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 11:31 PM
2

"Roughly equal shares of U.S. men and women say they’re often lonely" https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/01/16/men-women-and-social-connections/
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 11:21 PM
45

Set aside everything else that's wrong with this for a second ... Imagine saying, "We don't want to ENSLAVE you! That would be wrong. We just want to eradicate you!"--- and still thinking you're the "goodies".
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 11:16 PM
29

I was just thinking, I could very easily see an antisemite saying, "We wouldn't hate Jews so much except it's a natural reaction to them controlling the world through finance---" or something like that ....
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 11:13 PM
4

That's true. I'm only trying to describe general tendencies ... I just think we lose a lot by oversimplifying the past in most modern discourse, and the "simplest" explanation which seems accepted as default fact is often "patriarchy exists [or existed] because men in the past were Bad People, and for no other reason/s."
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/25 02:39 AM
4

I think if you read almost anything written before the mid-20th century, what you might call "patriarchy" pretty clearly existed primarily because before birth control and modern medicine and formula, women were pregnant much of their adult lives, and semi-incapitated with the complications of pregnancy and nursing, so they basically were not able to "go out into the world" and "fight"---plus since they are on average physically weaker, as you point out---it made less sense to divide that labor …
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 06:31 PM
3

Aside from everything else stupid about that comment ... "The Y chromosome has less DNA" part really gets me ... Because while that is true, that is (1) irrelevant and (2) implies this person doesn't know that the father can contribute an X chromosome ... which implies they're this obsessed with sex, without knowing the basics of how it works ....
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 08:14 PM
6

I'd say that just has to be trolling, but ... it was posted yesterday, and has 6,300+ likes and 314,000+ views!? That's so disturbing.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 08:06 PM
4

It's actually worse than a 5 year old's sense of justice. A 5 year old might want to hit someone for hitting, or maybe even slighting them----but most 5 year olds would intuitively grasp that it would be wrong to hit other people next to the person hit them, because they didn't stop them fast enough ... or to hit someone for resembling the person who hit them ... or hit someone because someone who looked like them hit their mother or grandmother when she was in kindergarten ... etc. Earlier this…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 04:50 PM
16

Just today, in response to an article in my feed on Facebook, titled "Why can't men see that the Man vs Bear Meme is about women's trauma?" I posted the following: [Because it seems to me like the entire point is to express performative disdain for men. In the year plus since this has been a thing, I've seen articles about stuff life "study shows men go to bed more often without brushing their teeth than women ..." and there will always be a comment, "this is why we choose the bear!" Are you tel…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/25 10:48 PM
2

They probably got downvoted because of the last 5-6 sentences, where, instead of stopping at, "it's bad on both side," they implicitly defend the women saying his nephew should kill himself because this guy is "the wrong kind of male advocate."
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 12:47 PM
29

Sometimes, I think like ... do they have little books like a Small Catechism, that just have all these phrases they repeat like creeds or mantras ... like, I picture a woman with a septum ring, standing in front of rows of pews of women with blue hair, and she goes: "Misandry doesn't exist!" and they all say in unison: "But if it does, it's a justified response to misogyny!" And she says: "Misandry only hurts dudes feelings!" And they all say in unison: "But misogyny kills!" Together: "Amen!"
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 06:15 AM
1

So one bad thing has to have exactly the same effect as another bad thing, before it can be considered bad?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 12:32 AM
1

This is a woman who's never even heard of volunteer firemen, so ....
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 05:43 PM
10

I think when I see this "misandry isn't real" claim now, I'm going to say, "OK, for the sake of argument, let's say that you're correct and misandry isn't real ... you have also stated that you 'hate men the most'--- what term or word would you like to use to represent your state of hatred for men?" We need to highlight how much of an effort misandrists make in trying to get bogged down in semantics instead of addressing the offensive behavior. It kind of reminds me of when someone who hates gay…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 11:46 AM
1

I agree with most of what you wrote. I have to be frank though ... as far as Medium posts go, the fact that she emphasized "not all men" herself makes me much less irritated with what she wrote than the vast majority of misandry I see on social media.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/25 10:35 PM
5

The post isn't saying: you should be more open-minded and respectful about stretch marks, especially because you fail to appreciate what mothers go through in pregnancy ... ... it's saying if you don't find something attractive, you don't deserve to exist. To me, that's a big difference in terms of how the poster chooses to communicate.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 02:42 AM
21

Oh, I see ... it gets worse and worse as it goes along. It makes me profoundly sad to think how poorly educated these women must be to write something like "men have never been more rapey and violent" in history, when the exact opposite is true. I literally have no idea how you can think that. The "women are the only animal on earth who has to have sex with their predator thing" is so insanely ignorant as well, and is another common cliche. Even if you don't take "predator" literally and interpr…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 02:32 AM
22

Big propaganda push. It'll be like the bear was two years ago. In the next couple months, get ready to see endless TikToks and reels about how women are embarrassed to be in relationships with men, and they'll be sounding off: "this is why we're embarrassed to be in relationships with men!" like a mantra in every comment section.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 12:01 AM
9

Josh 2.0 (an idiot, in my humble opinion ... but I digress)--- was forced to apologize for making a "rape joke" or lose his Comedy Central show, in 2012. I have no sympathy for him. But it proves that the premise that men making rape jokes is remotely socially acceptable is false.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/10/25 07:22 PM
11

That doesn't change the fact that murder, in modern developed countries, is extremely, extremely rare.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/10/25 07:16 PM
1

I agree. If someone interprets "Please stop saying bad things about men" as "Let's say bad things about women ..." that's their problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/10/25 12:40 AM
2

This person is here to troll.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/10/25 12:31 AM
5

As someone above said, I'm more disheartened how few "normal women" ever stand up to them or contradict them. And that's not even getting into how the social media platforms will condone advocating for literal genocide. Just against this ONE group of people, of course.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 01:34 AM
4

It's very telling in itself how buried this quote is---36th paragraph in a 49 paragraph article: “The children were different races, and there were twins and singletons,” he said. “There was no real methodology there that we can put together. The only thing they have in common is that they are all boys.” Like CNN doesn't know what it's doing, by barely even mentioning it. Gender reverse that, and the headline would have been: "Male nurse serial abuser of baby girls?" And the comments would all b…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 01:19 AM
8

I've had that argument many times. EVERY hateful, prejudiced person thinks, "but the group I hate actually IS bad!"
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/25 11:07 PM
19

You know, I often think ... The suicide rate for "cis" men in the US is 22.8 per 100,000. For women it's 5.9 per 100,000. For transgender persons the data isn't available for the US. But to the extent we assume that there is a higher suicide rate, either based upon extrapolating from other countries, or based upon reports of contemplation of suicide ... a common position among many sectors is to assume that harassment, prejudice, societal non-acceptance, etc directly leads to increased suicide. …
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/25 07:47 PM
2

Here are good examples of the mental harm which society wide misandry does to men, which the misandrists dismiss.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/25 07:30 PM
16

I'm glad I don't have a son, for him to be subjected to this hateful s***, and society's tacit, and sometimes overt, approval of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/25 11:23 PM
6

This is all quite incredible stuff. Thank you for posting. It really turns the misandrist narrative on its head. I can see why this data is not widely circulated. It completely undermines one of their foundational "truths" (ie "all women must constantly live in fear of men raping them, because most men have that proclivity").
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/25 01:37 AM
2

That's crazy it's not against their terms of service not to proclaim your hatred for the people you're supposedly trying to date.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 01:52 AM
24

Billie Eilish: "Nobody ever says a thing about men's bodies. If you're muscular, cool. If you're not, cool. If you're rail thin, cool. If you have a dad bod, cool. If you're pudgy, love it! Everybody's happy with it. You know why? Because girls are nice. They don't give a fuck because we see people for who they are!" Also Billie Eilish: "Why is every pretty girl with a horrible looking man? I don’t understand. Look, I’m not shaming people for their looks, but I am though. You give an ugly guy a …
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 01:47 AM
3

Yes. The fact that some people believe these things doesn't surprise me, or even bother me that much. You're going to have crazy, hateful people of all types in the world. The fact that the social media platforms promote, enable, and mainstream the sentiment is what bothers me. I have dozens of posts like this with between thousands to hundreds of thousands of likes and shares saved, and continually encounter women on social media who say things like, "no women say ... [X misandrist thing]" ... …
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/25 11:19 AM
24

How do you even enjoy reading romance if you're a self-described misandrist?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/10/25 02:10 AM
14

The last known lobotomy occurred in 1967, and the procedure was rare by the 1960s. It was a horrible, misguided thing. But more than 40% of the victims were men. Maybe 50,000 people were lobotomized in the US total ... barely more than the number of men who commit suicide in the US in one year. To use that very rare 60+ year old practice as an example of how "women aren't allowed to express their emotions either" is so far beyond disingenuous. But then everything about this post is.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/10/25 01:27 AM
3

What the heck does "I think your waffle might be blue" mean?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/10/25 01:21 AM
9

The delusion of the last line on the last slide is what gets me. "In nature, male animals fight, compete, and often die for access to the female body/breeding." Let's just take that for granted as a completely true statement for a minute (which it isn't). How do these women complain constantly (or at minimum, do not contradict other women who say these things), which we see quoted on this thread all the time, like, "99% of all violence comes from men" and "we live in a rape culture" etc. BUT the…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 11:24 AM
1

I would be interested in that experiment. I would be shocked if the bisexual men didn't say that the men and women were equally attractive, while the bisexual women would say the women were more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 09:47 PM
1

I'm glad someone said this, as I really resented this, when I was single. (And I'm even relatively tall.) To basically ever have your prospective partner sexually desire you even a little bit ... a heterosexual man has to build some muscle and eat VERY mindfully ... watching calories and protein .... you basically have to train like an athlete, just to get a date ... ... oh, and hope you're lucky enough not to have male pattern baldness! But a woman has to ... eat a normal amount of food, if mod…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 09:41 PM
11

This is the honestly what I think is the single biggest misandrist issue. Social media basically controls society. Men being the only group which can be outrageously hated on is a SIGNIFICANT cultural bias. And it does destroy the mental health of male users, which is obvious by where we're at in society. I am routinely shown posts on Facebook from misandrist content creators whom I have BLOCKED. When I go to block them, I can't because I see that I already have.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/10/25 04:40 PM
2

Single women have always been able to own their own property in the United States. Laws allowing married women to legally own property were passed in every US State by 1900. It is also not true that "women couldn't own bank accounts. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974---commonly quoted by feminists on the internet to mean "women couldn't own bank accounts until 1974"--- in fact, made it illegal at the federal level to discriminate on the basis of sex when offering credit. In actuality, man…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/25 09:44 PM
6

You made the demonstrably false claim "no one hates little boys ..." That is an obviously false claim. Now, rather than admit you were wrong, you are retreating to the implicit positions "the hatred of males, even young boys, as such, isn't wide spread enough to be concerned about" or "it isn't effective enough in practice or policy to be concerned about." The statement that girls are aborted everyday is an irrelevant red herring, as being opposed to hating young boys based upon misandry does no…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/25 11:49 AM
26

This article is mostly just sour-grapes ... that said, I don't expect much "journalistic" probing or self- reflection in an article like this, but ... Imagine saying, totally unironically: “I’m looking for a man who … has goals and ambition, is intelligent, trustworthy, a provider, supportive, considerate, kind, assertive, masculine, honest, faithful, intentional, has a healthy self-esteem and a sense of humour, loves to go out, and likes fitness. These basic qualities are hard to find these day…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/25 12:54 AM
5

Anytime someone writes on the Internet "no one ..." the rest of the sentence is a lie. In the anti-natalist sub-Reddit, I literally just saw someone write, a few days ago: "The main reason I'm child free is because I couldn't stand to have that in my home if it was a boy, and I'm scared to have a girl because of how pedophiliac men are." It had 319 likes. (Not a huge amount, to be clear, but certainly not down voted!) There's a semi-popular hash tag in 4B circles, "AbortMaleFetuses"--- which was…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/25 07:47 PM
37

I actually think the single most annoying thing on the internet to me is when a man objects to some general, male-hating statement and says, "not all men ..." And they jump all over him with, "you don't need to say that! The fact that you said it proves you're one of the bad ones!" Etc. ... one of their most common comments, is: "Like, literally, no one says it's all men, OK?" Then you can show them comment after comment after comment of one version or another of: "Yes, all men!" or "Virtually a…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/25 09:30 PM
3

My grandmother's dying words were, "I'm going to be with pappy again ... " [what she called my grandfather] ... and I've had an online feminist tell me that was internalized misogyny. I'm not kidding. That's how committed they are to "all women were abused forever, in every situation, in every way ... and, oh, btw, basically still are ..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:31 PM
4

I was once in an Instagram thread, in which a self-described feminist made a comment for the Male Loneliness Epidemic being men's fault, etc. I said: "I only every hear about male loneliness in the context of women online saying things like, how they think male suicide being four times higher than women is funny, and stuff like that" A woman replied: "I don't believe anyone says that. You're just making up something in your head to get mad at." The comment RIGHT ABOVE hers was a woman saying, "I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:26 PM
2

You'd better be telling your fellow feminists that Andrew Tate---or "the Manosphere"---or "incels"---can't ever be mentioned again because they primarily exist/existed online.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:19 PM
10

Man vs bear was the turning point for me. I still consider myself slightly left of center, but I will not support self-described feminists at this point. It was just so, so illogical, and it was so obviously just a chance to shit in men. The mantra they developed, "this is why we choose the bear!" proves it. I saw a post on FB which said that a study showed that men are more likely to go to bed without brushing their teeth than women .... one of the top comments was "this is why we choose the be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:15 PM
2

When "feminists" espouse the whole, "we can impute guilt to all men for the small minority of men who SA or are actively violent, because men are responsible for policing other men ..." and "it's all men until it's no men" and "if there were really 'good men' you'd do something about the 'bad men' etc, I pose the following question: "A majority of white women in the United States voted for Donald J. Trump. He would not have won without them. You no doubt attribute this to internalized misogyny. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 11:04 PM
17

Do men even say "women are SO emotional"? Outside of like, a 40+ year old standup routine? I see women complain about this all the time, but I don't know who's saying this.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/09/25 10:48 PM
3

Women face some stigma which men don't. Not being included in medical research is not a currently existent one. As I think you know--my point is---do you think this women who complain about things like women not being historically included in medical research have the attitude of ..."OK, now we acknowledge that, and that's progress" ...so let's move on?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 01:39 PM
2

My God, why are they so obsessed with Andrew Tate!? Isn't he banned on every platform except X? Is he actually even remotely "influencing" young men at this point??
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 05:34 AM
1

Yeah, and the medical field didn't acknowledge that newborn babies feel pain until ****ing 1987! That doesn't mean society hated babies, in particular.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 05:30 AM
43

I swear, it's like they're trying to specifically alienate people.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/25 09:48 PM
8

Don't forget, there's also a Kafka Trap attached to the motte!
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/25 10:17 PM
18

So there was a certain feminist subreddit a few months ago, which posted the question, "Why do men think feminists want to punish all men?" I wrote: "When I was in elementary school, a boy in my class peed in a univent in the bathroom, which caused that whole wing to smell like burnt urine. The teachers and aides were all women, and their response to this was, 'None of the boys can use the bathroom anymore.' Eventually enough of us complained to our parents, who complained to the principal, that…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/25 05:50 PM
6

What is that even about? I don't get that.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/25 07:19 PM
27

I love in the first comment: " ... so aside from the pool of men who actually care about their partner as a person and desire to have them happy and cared for ..." So basically: "If you don't count all the good people, all there is is bad people!"
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/25 08:03 PM
29

I have seen this study cited by people any number of times as, "1 of 3 Australian men admit to assaulting---[or, in some instances, sexually assaulting] their partners ..." But the definition of abuse they used was so expansive: "Any behaviour within an intimate relationship (including current or past marriages, domestic partnerships or dates) that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm ..." So hypothetically, you could say, getting up to go to the bathroom on a date and just leaving inst…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 11:46 AM
8

I'm probably a good bit older than you guys, but you're not alone in this stuff affecting your mental health. I has a rough time of dating when I was young, but I've been married a long time now, and I still occasionally have irrational crises when my wife and I are going through rough patches of thinking, "she doesn't really love me, after all women can never truly live men, can they? There are so many women who say they can't!" I have tried to reason with so many self-described feminists about…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 04:12 AM
12

Instagram and TikTok are probably actually worse.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 04:01 AM
7

That's a good point, but unfortunately, nothing anyone says does any good. These little quotes and sayings are like religious mantras. I have sometimes said, "Do you ride in a car? Do you constantly remind people how scared you are and how dangerous it is? Because if you are a woman in western country, you are more likely to be killed in a car accident than to be murdered." Just gets non sequitur answers. (Usually some version of, X% of women have been raped, and Y% of rapists are men!)
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 03:59 AM
14

And now if this guy stays with this woman, he will dread every birthday and Christmas from now on, waiting on pins and needles for some sign, some quiver of the lip, some body language cue or sigh or flat tone, that shows he is about to get destroyed again for not getting a gift perfectly right.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 01:49 AM
77

If you really believe that at least half of the people around you at all times is on the verge of killing or raping you, you are literally clinically paranoid. Other women need to step up and tell these women that they're ruining their own mental health, if they believe these paranoid delusions, since they obviously won't listen to men. (I don't think they actually believe it, for the most part though ... maybe some of them. Many of them just believe they can take men down a peg by consistently …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/25 05:12 PM
2

Yes. She really thought it out.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/25 03:47 AM
2

No kidding. If J.K. Rowling makes a snarky tweet, trans-people will kill themselves, but self-described feminists can say, "actually the male suicide rate needs to be higher" and that's just fine, because "misandry only hurts your feelings, if it even exists"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 12:16 AM
5

Oh, I definitely agree, it's a completely short-sighted and unreasonable take on their part ... but I've seen many, many times, when men online confront them with comments like, "How do you propose to have daughters and future women without male input at all?" they say things like, "I've got news for you, sperm banks exist!" and if someone says, "where do you think the sperm comes from?" they say either, "well ... soon they'll be genetic engineering!" or "there's already enough sperm in banks we…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/25 12:43 PM
12

That's my problem with all this. I expect there will be some women who say this stuff, just because people are damaged, or trolling, what have you. It's that almost no other women will call them out on it, which really bothers me.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/25 11:44 AM
10

Some of them are so pessimistic, nihilistic, and/or depressed that they want humanity as a whole to end. Many of those in the 4B movement believe, as highly influential feminist - Sally Miller Gearhart (originator of the phrase, "the Future is Female"), that through sperm banking (or genetic engineering) and IVF or selective abortion, that male births should be eliminated. These are people who advocate genocide while patting themselves on the back for how non-violent they are.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/25 11:42 AM
3

I saw feminists say that J.K. Rowling is guilty of "genocide," because she is so influential in her bullying of Trans people that she's "making" them kill themselves. So if you apply that logic to society's misandry (ex. threads acceptable to the social media platforms with thousands and thousands of likes and shares, like: "Men are clearly too alive" "Oh, you're preggo? Is it a girl or an abortion?" And of course: "Nah, male suicide needs to be higher") --- then what is the explanation for why …
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/25 01:30 AM
1

I don't think is meant to be implemented as much as meant to normalize other, less overt but still insidious forms of misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 02:01 AM
1

I realize this guy was apparently joking, but your answer is still very good with regard to the total lack of disclaimer or backlash, if this is really the "minority." I had this episode on Instagram ... A self-described feminist on Andrea Berghoff's page, who identified herself as Giulia Tofana (Google her if you don't know), claimed to be a medical doctor. In response to my saying: "I would not want to be a man who had a doctor with that name on Instagram ... it implies you're willing to poiso…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 01:56 AM
1

I once posted, the following (which is 100% true) to defend myself from the typical, "you have a dead bedroom because your wife is tired because you're a manchild routine": " I do 100% of the cooking and grocery shopping; 50% of the laundry; before we had a housekeeper, 100% of the cleaning except for "dusting"; before we had a dishwasher, 100% of the dishes, and still all of the loading and unloading; 90+% of pet care; 80+% of child appts; 80+% of child transportation; 50%+ of non-shared time c…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 01:44 AM
22

Ah, yes recent author of, "Stop looking for the perfect woman and become a better man" ... an article which he then congratulated himself for writing, by sharing on X with the comment, "we write the articles which we need to read." I actually think I dislike the pseudo-intellectualism and pretensiousness more than I dislike the self-hating misandry. And unsurprisingly, a lot of it isn't even true. For example, he asserts men don't have friends like women do, but: " Men and women are about equall…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 01:03 AM
2

Even if that was true, it's not relevant anyway. Some of the worst arguments I've had with self-described feminists online has been over their refusal to admit that 99% of rapists being male (even if it were true) is irrelevant to less than 1% of men being rapists.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:56 AM
2

Where do you get off calling him "boy"!? The entire issue is, apparently, you just want to be disrespectful to people and if they push back and don't tolerate bullying, they're "fragile."
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:53 AM
2

" ... most men have fragile egos (which is, again, fact proven by the world - men raping or killing women when they don't get what they want? should I go on?)" Do you ever stop and think of how full of it you are, if you think MOST men are "raping and killing" women when they don't get what they want?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:51 AM
2

I know .. Imagine thinking someone saying, "Consider both sides" is offensive ....
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:46 AM
1

Seriously.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:41 AM
1

That's it, in a nutshell.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:37 AM
2

It's like the ultimate cheat code to always be able to say your male partner is worthless, as influencers like Paige Connell evidence: No matter how fair and egalitarian the husband and/or father is, in sharing in household chores and child care, the wife/mother always "wins," according to her own score-keeping, because, you see, even if it was 50/50, even 60/40, she still THOUGHT about it more.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:35 AM
2

"Testerical" is popular lately. They think it's really clever.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:31 AM
3

Ask us if we feel "loved."
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 12:26 AM
1

Are you excluding that as being possibly true?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:36 AM
1

It's also common in those threads for the high libido male to "try romancing his wife again," only to consistently get shot down again and again anyway, because "he just wants sex, " ie his motive apparently isn't pure enough. (As if that wasn't part of his motives at the beginning of the relationship!) I think part of the "romance" in early relationships is tension and anxiety, combined with some degree of fantasizing ... and you're just never going to recapture that with someone with whom you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:32 AM
2

I have often chafed at the idea that years of loyalty, blood, sweat, and tears earns less of the vaunted "emotional safety" which women supposedly need to have sex with their husbands of many years ... than a few weeks of dates and dinners.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:27 AM
1

"Women want to have men in their lives, they are not maliciously trying to torture men, but well, it’s not that simple." The prevailing sentiment on social media seems to be that women wish all men on earth would disappear, and that that women should "decenter" or "disassociate" from men. There are numerous comments on numerous recent posts in this subforum saying that. Relevant to the OP's struggle: hypothetically, a "nice guy" would respect the sentiment and completely avoid women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:18 AM
1

Yes. And People's first Sexiest Man Alive in 1985 was Mel.Gibson ... not Fred Rogers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:13 AM
1

Except why is your wife going to desire you, if women don't, in general, desire men? Which do you think is more likely for the avg man: you find one of the (who knows how small) minority of women who are attracted to men (even close to the degree to which the avg man is attracted to women) --- or a woman who wants the social status of being married is willing to sort of play along with being attracted to you for "long enough"? This "expecting women at the grocery store to find you attractive" th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:09 AM
1

I'm glad to hear that. I've virtually never seen a woman challenge another woman on this crap.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 02:32 AM
1

Have you ever heard them say anything remotely to the effect of: "You know there are a lot of crazier, extremist feminists out there, we should try to dissociate ourselves from them because they kind of hijack the whole thing in academia, publishing, and social media?"
/r/MensRights28/08/25 02:29 AM
1

I once commented--- and this was my only comment in the thread, so it wasn't like it was a reaction to another comment---"If you're concerned with equality, how about you call yourself egalitarian, and not have to constantly explain 'feminism means equality'?" And the one response I got was: "How about you go **** yourself"
/r/MensRights28/08/25 02:26 AM
2

You are subordinate to your boss. Subservient means to obey without question, and implies being of lower value or importance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:04 PM
0

No one is subservient to anyone else, and no one should be treated as subservient to anyone else. In any context. So I fundamentally disagree with you on that. I do believe that, in many cases, the better you treat your partner over a long period of time, the more they take you for granted, and that may lead to you being treated worse by them. For example, if one partner (stereotypically but not always the woman), is content with a dead bedroom, but feels very assured that because her husband is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:53 AM
24

Something I've never understood about this, is they do usually say: "Society HATES older women ..." But Society is more than 50% female, so who do they even mean? Surely they don't mean younger women and other older women are included in that? Or do they? If they mean "Men HATE older women ..." why don't they say that? Because I really don't care how old, say, my pharmacist looks. Or my allergy doctor. Or the district judge. (All older females.) Etc. In fact, to the extent that they are "old," I…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:38 AM
1

Wow, that is very interesting. Also ... insane she filmed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:29 AM
2

Funnyfloss222 already explained it very well, and you asked for further qualifiers ... Basically, it is an inherently intimate act--- in many instances, the bodies are LITERALLY connected. People literally emotionally connect with people by something with them which they will not do with anyone else. It also happens to be often be very pleasurable. Obviously, there are people in the world who are willing to have sex without being close to the person. I do not agree with that outlook on life, tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:30 PM
2

You know that the world has many people in it, who view sexual intercourse as a deeply intimate act that you might only do with 1 person--- at most, a small handful of people---in a lifetime. YOU may not view it that way, but you can't use your imagination to put yourself in the mind of someone who does think that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:21 PM
1

All men who want sex are solely driven by ego, and no one has sex for love, huh? Ha. I'd hate to see it if you WERE trying to pass judgment, jeez.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:16 PM
2

What is your point in even asking this question? Your position (and the position of many/most women online) is: "Average women don't need average men." So there's no way anyone could answer this question that would change your mind, and by definition, you believe there is nothing which an "average man" could ever do to add value to (or, I guess, "make enjoyable") the life of an average woman--- so then I guess the definition of an "average man" is "any man whom you look down on ..." I don't know…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:12 PM
9

Imagine, wanting your spouse to desire you! Ha. I mean, you're literally right, and I am bitter about. One of the worst realizations I had in life was when I realized that no matter what you do as a man, you will NEVER have a woman desire you the way you desire her. They didn't tell us that growing up ... women were socialized by romantic comedies, primetime soaps, and reality TV to be the sex that was "interested in love" ... I'm glad I got married and had kids, because I love my children more …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:55 PM
2

It is true, we should all aspire to see with eyes unclouded by hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 12:47 AM
7

A man who said, "let's leave a group of diseased women behind" wouldn't even make it off the stage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 11:40 PM
4

It blows my mind that there are so, so, so many people who I've argued with online, that "misandry doesn't exist" ... would still watch this video and not see that society is willing to accept saying "leave this group of people for dead"----because of their gender. Even if you aren't an "incel," if you're a man, I don't know how this kind of mentality wouldn't disturb you---because it's so obvious how little compassion society would have for you, as a man, if/when you are down ....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 11:39 PM
1

Sure you do
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:57 AM
6

Imagine people analyzing, say, Brian Laundrie killing Gabriel Petito, as ... "oh gee, what could have happened to him to make him want to do this? Surely it couldn't have just been his choice to do it. I guess it must have been an equipment malfunction ..."
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:45 AM
7

I have seen them blame lesbian divorces on the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:39 AM
1

Will they confront and renounce the KillAllMen feminists though? Because other ideologies with these outspoken hateful elements are expected to call them out ... because I see comments so the time, like: "Men's loneliness can't be cured because they're not actual human beings" "WTF would I ever have empathy for men?" "Straight women are proof that you can't choose sexuality because no woman should ever be attracted to a man" "Men are clearly too alive" "Oh, you're preggo? Is it a girl or an abor…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:35 AM
2

I'm sorry to say it, but while my wife will SAY, "you ought to spend more time with your friends," the historic reality is, most any time I've proposed actually doing something with my friends, then it's, "ohhh ... not that weekend, we're busy that weekend" (with no alternatives) .... I doubt if that experience is unique.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 05:55 AM
1

What is the source is that statistic from? There was a study of about 500 people in approximately 2005 which produced those numbers ... But the larger often reported study in 2015, which asserted this disparity was later retracted due to a data error: https://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21/to-our-horror-widely-reported-study-suggesting-divorce-is-more-likely-when-wives-fall-ill-gets-axed/ Has there been an unrestracted large-scale study on this topic, or one done nationwide or in the last 20 yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:07 AM
5

I'm sorry, I don't agree with this advice at all. There's a chance they will take it as him refusing to take no for answer as to them ... ... and there is NO chance they'll give an honest answer. Most people don't even know why they reject someone themselves, and they certainly aren't going to answer honestly if they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:42 AM
1

To quote Hermes Conrad: "My God, he never took middle school hygiene! He never saw the propaganda film!"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:50 AM
2

Women have no idea how much higher the average man's desire for sex is than the average woman's. If it was the same, women would have many of the same problems men have--- though it would be a totally different world in general. OP's take makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:43 AM
1

This is definitely, absolutely true. On top of that, I also believe the random average woman is much less attracted to "her man" than the random average man is attracted to "his woman."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:40 AM
1

I suppose you think if you were reborn as a man, desperately desirous of "sh*t," but also fundamentally "unworthy," you wouldn't ever complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:29 AM
–

Now women who do things that appeal to men are Nazis, or at least Nazi-adjacent ultra-right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:25 AM
5

As have I. In fact, I have "defended" other men on Instagram, countless times, saying things like, "assuming that all lonely men deserve it is a Just World Fallacy," and am usually met with a siege of comments like: " ... the fact that your defending incels proves how you deserve to be alone!" On the rare occasions when I point out that I've been married for 15 years, or some random commenter stalks me enough to see that, then they'll add that they hope my wife leaves me. I am not exaggerating. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:55 AM
1

That's artisans, not artists.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:20 PM
0

"Men shun the arts because the arts aren't manly enough" is such an incredibly bad faith take theory, attributing bad motives to men as a default position, which pervades all of these discussions. You don't even consider the possibility that perhaps men are being gate-kept out of the arts? (Either because physical attractivess sells better, see the music industry, to the extent it survives at all; or because almost all of the decision-makers are women, see the publishing industry!) OR, in my vie…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:18 PM
1

I do not see where the article about the Pew Research study says that men express greater isolation. That article seems to equate "feeling isolated" and "feeling lonely." Maybe I'm missing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:55 AM
1

The study she cited says men and women are roughly equally lonely. So .... "A new Pew Research Center survey finds that, compared with women, men don’t report that they feel lonely more often or have fewer close friends"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 03:01 AM
1

The study she linked says men and women are equally lonely, and both have friends. The major gendered difference is women have more frequent contact with their friends. But that apparently doesn't result in less average loneliness. So ...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:56 AM
1

How are they "managing loneliness" better if this study says they're equally lonely? It says they're reaching out to their friends more frequently (not even by a statistically huge amount ... barely into double digits)---but the end of result is apparently the same level of loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:52 AM
1

It often seems to me like women think men just choose to be horny, out of spite and stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:50 AM
1

"Maintained social ties" is itself a mischaracterization of the data you shared, and has an inherently negative connotation because failure to maintain something of value could be seen as inherently "bad." It appears as if the study you linked shows that men don't socialize with their friends as much, but still have at least one close friend, on average, the same as women. Most importantly, the rates of reported loneliness are the same. So wouldnt it be equally valid to spin the result as, "Stud…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:47 AM
1

And that's vilified and considered absolutely abhorrent.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:51 AM
1

You see a few hundred or a few thousand posts from women writing things like, "feminism didn't teach me to hate men, I always hated men, feminism taught me I was right" with thousands upon thousands of likes, and you start saying to yourself as a man ... this doesn't seem to be about "seeking equality ..." And you virtually never see a woman comment in response to the overwhelming toxicity, "I'm a feminist and this doesn't represent me." ... when she does, she gets buried under an avalanche of "…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:47 AM
6

I'm a man, but ... do women honestly think that most of those guys in that collage are not above average attractiveness? That's insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:31 PM
6

"Men end up bitter on the internet after they already failed to date, it is not the root cause." This is the single biggest thing which I argue with self-described "feminists" about. I have a major pet-peeve that everytime there is a report on social media of some man somewhere doing some bad thing, there will be comments from women about "and you wonder why men are lonely!" I have had numerous major arguments that lonely people are not "bad" and many of the people they hate would never describe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 05:12 AM
7

Responsibility and "fault" are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 05:00 AM
2

I'd personally be quite miserable sitting on billions while other humans starve to death, or exploiting workers to add meaningless percentage points. Not being bothered by sentiment is partially how you get very rich in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:56 AM
1

Yeah, I have a dead bedroom, and my wife acted crazy about me when we were first together, including sexually, so I don't know about that .... I go crazy thinking, was she never really attracted to me? How could I have been so wrong, when she seemed to want sex as much or more than I did? To be clear: those are rhetorical questions. I'm not asking for an analysis of my situation, I'm saying although I agree women settling for men they don't find attractive logically would lead to a dead bedroom,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:28 AM
3

The question the OP asked wasn't "is it possible," the question was, "is it hard?" If someone said, "question for the doctors: is medical school really as hard as they say?" And a bunch of doctors said, "oh my God, it's maybe even harder than they say!" Would your response be to disbelieve all of their firsthand accounts and say, "oh yeah--- well then why do 85% of the people pass, huh? Where do all these doctors even come from, if it's so hard?"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:07 AM
5

Just because they're in relationships doesn't mean that it was easy for them to get that relationship, ie "dating" could have still been very hard for them. Also, you can't just go by what you see ... single people just don't go out as much to be seen. I have a cousin who was just complaining to me that one thing he hates since his divorce is that it's embarrassing/awkward if he wants to go to a "sit-down" restaurant on a random night, to dine alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:58 AM
1

Like I said, I haven't dated in a long time ... but as to your last sentence--- what do you think is going on in the world, right now? (In the US, as an example, the birth rate is far below replacement and dropping and the majority of single women say they want to remain single.)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 11:45 PM
1

I'll tell you this much ... it's been many years since I dated, but as a fit (at the time), educated, liberal, reasonably-well off/well-employed man in my 20s it was HORRIBLE. Easily the hardest and most grueling things I had ever done ... very, very unpleasant process. From the time I got really started looking for a wife in earnest, to the time I met my wife, it was probably a 4-5 year period ... I really, really focused on dating (making myself as attractive as possible ... being open-minded …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 07:12 PM
8

I've seen these studies before, and it just blows my mind that the average is sex once per week. So that means for every middle-aged man (late 30s to 40s) having sex 2 to 3 times a year (which sure seems more believable based upon my anecdotal experience in life) ... there is a man married for years having sex 2 to 3 times a week!? (I'm not arguing with you ... it's just really hard to believe.)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 06:56 PM
5

It is not obvious at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 06:49 PM
–

Yes. And if you're looking for a needle in a hay stack, there's always he possibility, until you find it, that it's not really there at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:59 AM
–

Can any of the women who are replying to him saying they are young, attractive, are out and about, and live in populated areas explain why we men are constantly being chastised online by how disgusting we men are for constantly hitting on women in public, and how tiresome it is for women to be harassed and catcalled everyday, and we don't know what it's like, etc etc, if it apparently doesn't happen? You see other women telling us this online yourselves, right? (I routinely see women write stuff…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:54 AM
1

That data also looks pretty old.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:39 AM
–

Saying, "all my sons' friends have friends" is basically saying, "I'm not aware of the people no one's aware of ... "
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:30 AM
1

Because many/most men are hardwired to desire the respect and affection of women, or at least their approval in some way. Women aren't really attracted to men, in general, outside of being socialized to be, so because they don't experience having a deep longing for the opposite sex, they don't seem to get/understand the experience of men, and are inclined to attribute it to men being inherently bad or lacking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:10 PM
4

Have you ever seen Mel Brook's "The Producers"? Specifically, I'm thinking of Gene Wilder saying, " Let's assume, just for the moment, that you are a dishonest man ..." Let's assume, just for the moment, they didn't care that they pissed off as many or more women than they "succeeded" with. They still succeeded with more women than the guys who pissed off no women. That's the crux of the whole problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 02:01 AM
3

You would think that's true, but ask any conscientious, overly considerate guy, and I can almost guarantee he's had a much, much more frustrating time with women than his more risqué, overbearing, boundary-pushing friends and peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:47 AM
2

I would be interested in your theory for why it is that men are almost certainly more observant and sensitive to women's boundaries than ever before in history (for example, catcalling and SA have actually plummeted, statistically in many jurisdictions over the last 25 years) ... many men report that they would never approach a woman, at all ... ... and yet women also simultaneously report feeling more unsafe to be in society with men (to the point we have divisive phenoma like the infamous "bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:43 AM
1

I only ever dated with a committed relationship in mind, and I always paid for the date under the philosophy that I was the one to make the invitation and suggest the venue--- but if I ever had thought that the woman was conceptualizing it as "I'm paying her to put up with me [the man] while we're on the date"---I would have asked to split the check and left right then. What a screwed up view of the world. This other guy is right ... why are you even dating men at all if you hate us so much that…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:29 AM
1

I have seen women encouraging male suicide. (Many times, in fact, both specifically and in general.) I have seen women advocating that men should be eliminated entirely by aborting male fetuses. I have seen women advocate "all men should be chemically castrated until they prove themselves" or "all men should start in jail and earn their way out." I reported a woman (with "feminist in her screen name) on another platform recently for the comment: "fittin' to go on a manhuntin' spree and take out …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:42 AM
1

She's saying you should sexualize men to be "predatory" (her words, in the comments) basically to troll them ... much like how this is a troll post.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:54 AM
1

I guess people are going to misunderstand your intentions, if they're going to assume your intentions are good or in good faith, and your point is apparently just to troll, ie "two wrongs make a right" or "an eye for an eye" or something ....
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:50 AM
3

Same. And the fact that I'm 44 and the I'll probably die with that "if a woman told me she found me sexy" hypothetical unfulfilled, tells you all you need to know about women and their likelihood of "sexualizing men." I doubt if the average man gets told maybe once in his life by a woman that he's sexy, so it's no wonder he wouldn't believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:45 AM
1

What a bunch of nonsense. Every hobby is "escapism." That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:37 AM
5

I don't think you could possibly be more wrong. If I was single and much younger, I absolutely would give up on dating. Why would I waste all of my time trying to impress women, when like 2 out of 3 women say they want to remain single, more than half of women don't want to have children, and the internet is rife top to bottom with women saying how they just want left alone, they just want to be single, all men are rapists, they just want their peace, etc etc Part of what you're missing is not j…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:30 AM
3

(As a man): the emotional and psychological gratification that comes from feeling desired and validated by your partner’s attraction to you ... (For me, that includes making her cum) For me, it's not even close, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:21 AM
1

You consider those ... rare hobbies among men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:47 PM
1

This took me a long time to grasp, as well, and I guess I'm still coping with the realization that women just aren't really attracted to men. Certainly not even close to the way we are attracted to them. Throughout most of history, women needed men economically. Then, for the first generation after that was no longer true, from Disney to turn of the century RomComs to Twilight, the next generation was socialized to need men socially. But now that women are no longer socialized that way, and most…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:30 PM
9

So the whole point in this was just to frame the false dichotomy: "We have no choice but to ignore the extremely high rate of male suicide and crippling depression, because the only possible solution is dystopian government rape camps!" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:02 PM
8

What is even your point? People are allowed to want things they don't literally need, and it doesn't make them bad people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 03:40 PM
24

People like OP would just say "happiness" isn't a right, either. I do think wanting a mate/life partner is pretty strongly wired into the male brain. I'm not as sure about women anymore, as apparently they can be socialized out of it pretty effectively on a wide scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 03:31 PM
5

You can not want to take part, but still wish you ever had the option!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:22 AM
7

For most of my life, I just wanted to get married, have a family, and have semi-regular sex with one woman, whom I loved and found attractive. In other words, I thought it was best to be "husband" material, and I at minimum was not jealous of "hookup" material. After the first year or two, when sex, and then affection in general, got less and less before dwindling to essentially nothing, I realized that "husband material" often means ... you're emotionally supportive enough that I value you, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:15 AM
3

Then don't say you like "confidence," say you like showmanship, or, presentation, or something. Confidence comes from skills mastery. Men can be confident in some areas, and not in others. A man whose "confidence" is in flirting and body language cues is someone with skills mastery at chatting up women, ie someone who is "charismatic," or as the kids say, "has rizz." But I guess saying the number one most attractive thing you like is "confidence" sounds less stupid for many women than "rizz me u…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 01:55 AM
1

Women already don't find the men attractive who are complaining. They've lost nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:18 AM
1

Maybe nothing will get them what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:16 AM
2

Dating apps are a part of real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:03 AM
1

Why would you find it appealing to "rub her legs" if she was unreasonable and mean to you for no reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:55 PM
0

> "I find women's degree of liking confidence weird, frankly. " how is it dangerous or harmful? I don't agree with a lot of what the OP wrote, but I agree with what he says here, because when I was single and very, very frustrated with my lack of success in dating women, I was almost equally frustrated by my female friends' advice, "just be confident." Because you know who appears to be very "confident"? Cocky, selfish a**holes. Picture certain politicians, for example. They are NOTHING if not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:52 PM
1

How do you know that the vile things both genders express about the other online are not the average persons' true thoughts, and most people just can't get away with saying that "in real life?"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:38 PM
1

One of the sadder things I've come to terms with is that women are not really attracted to men. In the past this was handled through "needing" men economially, and more recently, extreme socialization. On a societal level, now that those things are gone or receding--- which I agree is equitable to the individual woman---I don't know what's going to happen. Almost certainly the gradual extinction of the species coupled with an intensification of the oft-touted "male loneliness epidemic." On an in…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:37 PM
1

I hear you, but do you get what I'm saying that once you know that these sentiments exist and are at least *somewhat* widespread, the possibility has been introduced into your mind that most women feel this way and just know better than to say it out loud in person---that thought can never really completely go away?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:44 AM
1

Yes. I agree with the OP's premise, but it reminds me of the thing women say, "if men got pregnant and had to give birth, they'd never be able to handle it"--- I've always thought---ok, well, that's a logically impossible hypothetical, because if men could get pregnant and give birth, then they'd basically just BE women. Here, the power imbalance-- which is indeed distressing to men, I have definitely experienced that myself--flows from intrinsic characteristics of the sexes. Like ... if women h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:43 AM
2

I'm willing to bet if you could somehow magically completely accurately tabulate the number of men whose idea of a relationship being only sex, vs. the women in long-term relationships who would just as soon not have sex with their man again ... it would not support the implication here that it was women being honest and up front about where the relationship would go ....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:35 AM
6

Absolutely agree. I used to go to the gym every day for years, never once heard anyone engaging in talk about sex. The MOST graphic thing might have literally, "hey did you see the girl in the really tight teal shorts?" and then some chuckles. NEVER heard anything remotely like a certain politician's infamous claim about "locker room" talk. On top of that, I have NO clue anything about my friends' sex lives ... how often, what they like, who's happy ... whereas my wife very clearly has made refe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:30 AM
4

It is simply not true to say: " ... she's opting out (from guys like that, not all guys) ..." Very few are saying: "I'm holding out for the right guy" Women in these spaces loudly and routinely and explicitly say that they hate ALL men, and VERY rarely do other women confront them on the basis that hating people based upon an immutable physical characteristic which you did not choose and cannot change is wrong. The very negative psychological effect which it has on men--- which I think is what t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:19 AM
5

I have often said to online "feminists" that if the female equivalent of KillAllMen had been a hashtag, every one who posts it would be banned, rather than it getting hundreds of thousands or millions of likes and shares. The responses are usually: (1) literally no response (2) "but you can't expect women to ignore thousands of years of oppression" (3) "men get their feelings hurt by misandry, but you're literally killing us" No amount of arguing the lack of logic or ethics behind those response…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 01:34 PM
0

Men in Ukraine defending their homeland from a direct, massive threat is not the same thing as men being sent to Vietnam (a country most couldnt even locate on a map) to half-heartedly prove a point about domino theory and the theories of men like Henry Kissinger, the military-industrial complex, and abstract global ideological struggles. Being willing to sacrifice yourself to directly protect your home is a totally different thing than not being willing to sacrifice yourself for a bunch of wast…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 08:55 PM
0

Yes ... and not just "change society" but change society to a hypothetical type of society which has never existed anywhere in the world in history ....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 08:48 PM
–

The first part of this response is basically saying, "if men were women, then they'd be women" ... so ... yes? How you even get the implication that the fact that men have very high sex drives--- much higher than you, as a woman can probably understand---logically leads to the conclusion that "women should be forced into endless pregnancies" is beyond me. "The notion that it okay for men to pursue sex at all costs is wrong"--- it certainly is, and nowhere can you find anything even vaguely like …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 08:38 PM
–

Women get pleasure from sex - probably/possibly generally true, but not accounting for if a woman does orgasm, it is much stronger and longer, and she has potential to be able to keep going (and men generally can't without a refractory period) As a man, I am jealous of the female orgasm, as it seems clearly better. Or at least curious. Self-esteem boost - probably true Reputation- mostly true, but culturally dependent and arguably influx True - sex is riskier for women for a variety of reasons, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 07:05 PM
–

I've never been called "creepy" or a "creep" by a woman to my face, but I would have no way of knowing if any have said that behind my back, anymore than you would. Regardless, I don't know what women think, but I find it creepy to say things like, "I don't exercise control over her, I'm just saying I could ..." It's not really my role to judge your situation though, or to personalize something in a forum involving a general question, so to that extent, I apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:01 PM
1

If you mean that literally, yes, men should not be "constantly" doing it, nor should they be "pressuring" women. But if you mean men should stop pursuing sex with women as much as they do, because it's illogical for them to do so, because it's often a disappointment after all, and, as they say the juice is often not worth the squeeze--- that basically not going to happen. Part of this thread, which I don't think women appreciate, is that while sex is not a "need" for men--- which I agree, it's d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:39 AM
1

On one hand, hopefully you're just a liar. On the other hand, ifvtrue, you're creepily bragging about 'controlling some woman in what you call FWB, but which she probably calls a 'situationship,' where you're bragging about 'withholding' from her, and probably giving her a long-term worse view of men in general. So ... cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:27 AM
3

I just read an excellent article by Richard Reeves on this point, which I quote: "Usually, progressives are reluctant to ascribe too much responsibility to individuals for their problems. If someone is obese, or commits a crime, or is out of employment, the progressive default is to look first to structural, external causes. This is a valuable instinct. It is all too easy to blame individuals for structural challenges. But there is one group that progressives do seem willing to blame for their p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:22 AM
1

At minimum I would consider it a source of shame not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:30 AM
1

Ok, I guess, but like ... I worked at a rural grocery store as a teenager in the 90s, and there were magazines being sold literally at the supermarket checkout (ex Women's Health, Glamour) which has articles about women's orgasms, and what to do ... and that was way before the internet was mainstream. I feel like men would have to be deliberately incurious to have at least not heard like, "most women probably can't cum from penetration alone" and stuff like that. I'm not trying to argue with you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:40 AM
1

I don't know, I hope this doesnt offend you, because maybe it's going to be too blue or raunchy, but there's apparently something wrong with me, because I've always thought the hottest porn was female directed lesbian porn, which I honestly feel like has taught me at least some useful things. I don't know how any straight man couldn't think a woman cumming isn't the hottest thing possible ...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:31 AM
2

Yep. As a healthy, middle class heterosexual white male Christian American, I have experienced very little misfortune of any kind in life, honestly basically nothing but what people call "privilege." I'd like to believe that I have empathy for other people from all walks of life, but I'll never really be able to walk a mile in their shoes. However, I know there are certain individuals or groups of individuals who would be unaccepting of my trying to work with them to build what I will broadly ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:25 AM
2

Almost as if a system of defining "axes" is going to be inherently based upon sorting out what axes "count" and which "count more," and therefore ultimately useless for anything but grievance-peddling and setting people against each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:17 AM
2

The fundamental flaw to that philosophy is that it completely fails if you want to have children. Once you have children, it becomes almost impossible to set boundaries/assert control in a relationship without indirectly punishing the children to at least some degree ... and if you are unwilling to accept less than primary physical custody, you also no longer have the ultimate hypothetical means of control (ie "just leave her"). In fact, one of the things which hypothetically gives you more cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:00 AM
2

I don't know about 1%. Probably more like 5-10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:52 AM
11

How are these things not well known to most men in the year 2025?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:22 AM
1

Isn't it kind of obvious from someone's personality, after getting to know them a bit, whether it's likely they will be selfish in bed or not? There has to be at least SOME correlation between a man generally be a selfish or at least self-centered or non-conscientious person and being selfish in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:18 AM
7

How can a man even be a "player" if he generally gets rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:15 AM
2

If you think a remotely comparable number of morgues and funeral homes (if any) are looking at male prospective candidates and saying, "I don't know, he has a penis, so he probably wants to have sex with corpses ... that's a known tendency which men have ..." vs. bars and nightclubs looking at a small or slight woman (if they even apply) saying, "I don't know if she's intimidating enough to be an effective bouncer ... " then ... I'm sorry, social media brainrot has claimed you. This is what I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:09 PM
1

He is much more likely to be a non-coercive man who isn't getting sex, and resents the fact that "bad" people are more successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:01 AM
1

And I'm not so comfortable judging and condemning people writ large when I haven't walked a mile in their shoes. What do you think future generations---if there are any-- will think of us?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:55 AM
–

I didn't say it was niche. I'm saying it's not considered mainstream acceptable by social media platforms, especially not in forms to the same level of extreme-ness as the posts above. It took YEARS before most platforms took down the hashtag KillAllMen. (And variations still exist.) And I'm sorry, I simply do not believe that the "bear" meme was meant to innocuously highlight women's fear of men. It was intended to create shock, upset feelings, controversy, discord, and strife between genders, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:49 AM
3

I don't put a lot of stock in "things we all know."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:31 PM
1

They should be allowed to do what they want, within the limits of reason and not hurting other people. I believe we can say, "Society has developed to a point where we can allow freedom to more and more people in more and more ways" (a general "progressive" goal)---without also saying, "and therefore every single male who lived in the past was a monster because society used to be more restrictive." Especially since "men being terrible throughout history" is so often used as a rationale by some f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:30 PM
1

I guess if you have no other response, misrepresent what I'm saying. Women have every reason to be cautious around men. It is also unreasonable to the point of being disingenuous to say that a "random" man is more dangerous than a powerful, unpredictable wild animal. Both of those things can be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:25 PM
1

Why would something about "domestic violence" feature a "random strange man" in the hypothetical?
/r/MensRights11/06/25 02:25 AM
1

If anything, it's discouraging showing how much influence TikTok and Instagram have programming young women.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 02:24 AM
1

Excellent points.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 02:16 AM
2

Carrying it further ahead in time, we as a society are very quick to paint men even in the recent past as unenlightened barbarians for "keeping women locked up at home"--but I often think about how much time it would take to maintain a household before, say, washing machines. Or vacuum cleaners. Or you have to go to several markets a day to prepare meals, because there are no supermarkets, no refrigerators, no fast food, and no pre-prepared meals that just need warmed up. SOMEONE is going to hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 02:07 AM
29

There's another talking point I see in feminist threads with no citable basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:59 AM
1

I literally don't understand. If your concern isn't to provide for your family, but is just to buy things you don't really need ("toys" I guess?) and you acknowledge that mothers generally have to do more than fathers, why not work less hours so you can help your wife instead of buying things you don't need?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:57 AM
1

This is still all kinds of wrong. That "1 out of 3 study" includes "emotional abuse" in the context of a relationship. That is not applicable to this context. You find a study which says 1% (or more) of all male-female encounters in society result in serious assaults. So every man who's been near you at the store, on the way to work, at the mall, at a concert-- any place you ever go--- really truly believe more than 1% of them are seriously physically assaulting you, such as to be more harmful t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:45 AM
1

Manosphere crap gets like, a few hundred likes and then gets banned. These posts I'm referring to get hundreds of thousands or even millions of likes, and the platforms are just fine with them. Literally like two days ago, I reported an Instagram post in a "feminist" thread which said, "I can't wait to go on a manhunt and unalive every sperm-maker I come upon." Instagram concluded that did NOT violate their terms of service. I'd bet you everything I make this week that if someone reported whatev…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:15 AM
1

Come on. You literally said "y'all." You can't make a sweeping generalization which includes the actual word "all," then put it on the group offended to not be offended. Is it acceptable to make a derogatory comment about ANY OTHER group, then say, "Oh, you should have known I didn't mean you, if you're one of the 'good ones'." ? Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:08 AM
1

A list of social media posts by self-declared feminists which received thousands upon thousands of likes, and were not deleted when reported: "Feminism didn't teach me to hate men. I have hated men all my life. Feminism taught me I was right." "I hate men. And not I won't apologize for that statement or make qualifications." "Nah, male suicide rate needa be higher actually" "most men are born are useless and are meant to die alone" "men are subhuman and their loneliness can't be cured because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:00 PM
1

Calling all men a piece of shit and then arguing that you're not misandrist is a pretty wild take, though admittedly extremely acceptable and widespread on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:56 PM
1

Neither one of those statements are true. But set that aside a moment --- more importantly, neither addresses the reasonableness of choosing a bear over a man. About 1% of bear-human interactions lead to serious attacks. That's not very many, but do you really believe that 1% of the men you casually run into in life try to assault you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:55 PM
1

Bull. One of the primary rationales for the intense hate directed at men on social media is that we're guilty by association for not doing enough to overthrow rape culture and the patriarchy. I have thread after countless thread in which "feminists" argue that all men are responsible for the behavior of other men, because we all benefit from patriarchy, and we all secretly condone the behavior of like, Harvey Weinstein or somebody by not actively confronting our friends about it at our semi-annu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:52 PM
1

Most men prefer sex in relationships because they're unlikely to get sex outside of a relationship because they aren't attractive enough to do so. (Said as an unattractive man.) There is no way on earth "most people" have casual sex when they are single. I don't know if that's true for women or not, but for most men, being single means no sex. For a small minority of men, it means a lot of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:50 PM
0

And you want better pay, because you feel the social pressure which men still feel to provide for their families, so it's still a gender expectation ....
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:46 PM
6

I was single for a long, long time before I met my wife, and the rejection and weird behavior was excruciating. I honestly don't know how I kept my self-esteem up enough to keep trying, let alone to be an attractive date to get into a relationship. It felt like a miracle I actually eventually found a woman who seemed extremely attracted to me (she wanted to have sex before I did and said I love you before I did) ... and whom I found very attracted. 15 years later we have a completely dead bedroo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:43 PM
1

The "reward" is really more lack of social sanction that it is a reward. For example, the day before yesterday, I reported a comment on Instagram, in a "feminist" thread in which a woman said, "I can't wait to go on a manhunting spree and unalive some sperm makers." After review, that comment was NOT deleted. I would bet you everything I made this month that if a man wrote the gender-flipped reverse of that, the comment would have been deleted and he might have even been banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:35 PM
1

Exactly right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:42 AM
1

As to women and apathy, women are more than twice as likely in modern America to be on antidepressants than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:40 AM
5

We have a housekeeper, but my wife disapproves of how well she cleans, and then cleans again a day or two later, then resents that I didn't do 50% of a job that didn't need done, because we just paid someone to do it (adequately well).
/r/MensRights01/06/24 08:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter