TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CrazyInAnInsaneWorld Archive

View 2 posts and 256 comments by CrazyInAnInsaneWorld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

New York Daily News columnist Shaun King agrees: Shaun King? As in this Shaun King, the guy who is convinced that, despite being whiter than an irish Well-digger's ass, he is "Trans-black" and somehow suffers from the same racial oppression Blacks in the Reconstruction-era South did? Might want to reconsider your sources, Robby...that being said, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:04 AM
1

I still personally find these values excessive across the board. And you're free to argue that. I was never arguing outside of the current paradigm we currently use with the legal system of being rather severe with Defendants that have a reckless disregard for the safety and well-being of their eventual victims. I readily admit I am being rather severe with what I intend for false rape accusers, because I see it as a very serious crime. Violence, using the State by proxy to enact it, in my view,…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:21 AM
1

Is it truly a vile and reprehensible act to abuse societies goodwill? This happens in a great many forms, from tax evasion to welfare fraud to false accusations to lying politicians. Should everyone in one of these categories be more severely punished than those who say, dodge debt collectors or commit insurance fraud or accuse a co-worker of harassment to the HR office or lie on their resume? And yet in every case, besides the "False Accusation/HR Complaint", which we are currently debating any…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 10:23 PM
1

Sure, send me a PM with what particular points you want summarized, and I'll take care of it after I get back from running errands, today.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:06 PM
2

The really rather ancient reform of the Justice system first proposed under the mantra of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" As I mentioned before, there is much more harm done to the victim of a false accusation than simply a loss of freedom. Everything from mental duress down to physical injury and even medical loss (HIV rates in prison are incredibly high, and sex offender prisoners face an inordinately high rape victimization per capita, to name one instance) are potential injuries to …
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:31 AM
1

Halo is up to Episode 5, now? Damn, I've been out of the loop for awhile...
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:25 AM
3

the false accuser should not be jailed for longer than the average time it takes for a trial to be brought. What's your basis for determining this? What precedent do you use to determine this? False accusations result in much more than simply a loss of freedom. There's mental and emotional damages, reputational damages, financial damages...the list goes on. If we add up the mental trauma of being arrested at some odd hour (like so many men are, in these cases), or arrested at one's place of empl…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 01:45 AM
1

Satire or not, it's still not something I can put my support behind. Maybe it's just a result of the SRS types repeatedly poisoning the well with "Oh, you can't take this seriously, it's satire!" but petitioning to deny a platform, even in satirical format, is not something I can throw my support behind. It's for the same reason I denounce that bill that the feminist politician put forward to deny men the ability to get scripts for Cialis/Viagra, unless they have a signed letter from their partn…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:14 AM
1

Disgusting. No-platforming is a despicable and intellectually dishonest/cowardly move, no matter who does it. It's wrong when the feminists do it, and it's sure as hell wrong when we do it. I can't support this, by any means.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:13 PM
2

Goldwater Conservative reporting in. I'd say that the argument is rather sound, but you have to differentiate between the Right-Left narrative of the "conservative-liberal" dichotomy and the definition of liberalism, as it was classically understood. You see, despite my technical identification as a 'conservative' (I'm averse to unnecessary risk, on fiscal grounds I abhor credit, etc.), my political stances line up with Classical Liberalism more than they do anything regarding the moral conserva…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:00 PM
1

I see no issue here. Here's how my thought process would have proceeded... So I'm driving home to the house I share with my fiancee and a woman around 20ish (maybe younger, I had just finished an 8 hour shift, I'm tired) almost falls into the road and on to my car, I'm going about 30 mph so wouldn't have killed her but might have done some damage. "Oh shit! Is she okay? Does she need an ambulance?" It is clear she is drunk so I need to think this through. "Oh, she's just drunk. That's a relief."…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:35 PM
1

While I don't dispute any of the rest of your post, you've got to be insane to suggest reporting ANYONE to DFaCS here in Dixie. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy, they are truly that incompetent. During the length of my time dealing with them, they have taken children from stable, loving homes, and put those same children into foster homes where their beds were, literally, old steel prison-bunks bolted into the walls, no mattresses. The foster parents were drug users (crystal meth and heroi…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 09:01 PM
1

While I don't dispute that it's gender bias, the inclusion of the racial component with the openly racist brother definitely gives him a tiny advantage, even if everything else screws him. It's an opening he can exploit, and as much as I'm irked at people that needlessly pull the 'race card', in legal disputes, it's a different matter entirely...you do what you have to do to win, plain and simple. That's why we see so many women pulling the "He's a drug user/wife-beater/daughter-molester/etc." c…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 08:42 PM
5

The show has bad guys that are unlikeable in a variety of ways, including a woman who hates men and tries to convince the girls that women are superior and it's ok to commit crimes against men. That was the old PPG, back during the days when Genndy Tartakovsky and Craig McCracken were still at Williams Street. McCracken (And likely Lauren Faust, his wife, which explains the Anti-SJW episodes of MLP:FIM, considering she wrote the storyboard for the "Equal Fights" episode starring Femme Fatale as …
/r/MensRights09/04/16 05:12 AM
1

Ctrl + F "Spacekatgal" Phrase not found Out of curiosity, where are ya'll seeing LW's review, here? Are they using a different account than usual?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:16 PM
3

I believe one of its mods is a mod in againstmensrights. IrbyTremor, who is also a mod in AMR, as you mentioned, as well as GamerGhazi (Explains the hate-on for KIA), BlackLadies (One hell of a racist sub, modded alongside fellow SRS'er TheYellowRose), and BlackLivesMatter. And, of course, AMR is part of the Fempire, meaning they're basically SRS supporters, by default.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:12 AM
12

/r/Offmychest is literally an SJW-run shithole of a circlejerk. I'm even willing to bet money the green one is TheYellowRose, judging by the bitchy attitude, the refusal to cite sources (AKA "Educate yourself, Shitlord"), and the use of buzzwords. Edit: Nailed it!
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:29 AM
2

You're assuming the best-case scenario (since when is any scenario in existence the absolute best-case possible, in reality?) and that none of those initial divorcees ever remarry, and taking that as the whole, because it suits your narrative. If you don't see how that's an intellectually-dishonest interpretation of the statistics I provided, then there's no use trying to talk reason to you. I've said my piece, already. Take the advice, or don't. But when the majority of divorces are initiated b…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:55 AM
6

It works for a lot of people. Exceptions to the rule. For every marriage that works, there are at least 2 that don't. (First marriages have a divorce rate of 40-50%, and second marriages have a divorce rate of 60%...and it only gets worse from there) That means the majority of marriages are ones that end in divorce. And when they don't work out, which can be for as petty a reason as she's no longer interested in you (a quality, you'll note, that you have zero control over, as you cannot control …
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:13 AM
12

It's almost as if they want to push a narrative, instead of actually solving problems. Imagine that... (Obligatory '/s' for those who didn't pick up on it)
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:07 AM
2

Personally, I'd like to know why the Prosecution is dropping charges. The article gives no reasoning as to why they are dropping the charges, and it's not like a lack of material evidence has ever stopped them from prosecuting charges based on He-Said-She-Said in the past when the accuser is female. Either way, there's not enough information to make a logical decision on anything here...
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:56 PM
1

To be fair, with false rape accusation inmates potentially getting shivved, and breast cancer research getting exponentially more federal funding than prostate cancer research despite the prostate cancer killing manyfold more men than breast cancer does women (even worse, the risk of people with cancer committing suicide doubles, making suicide a double-whammy for male prostate cancer patients), feminism could be said to indirectly cause many deaths, not to mention creating the environment that …
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:24 PM
3

Not that I disagree with the general sentiment of your argument...but if we were to hold all debates to that standard, technically every logical position gets it's ass handed to it by the intellectually dishonest argumentation tactics of feminists. That's why they use them; because they can't defeat arguments on their merits, and have to constantly move the goalposts, use personal attacks, and generally be dishonest cunts in order to attempt to discredit the person making the argument instead of…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:38 PM
2

Is there a feminist equivalent of Bill O'Reilly? Because the first thing I thought when I read their response was, in O'Reilly's voice, "Why do you hate America?!?" This guy/gal seems like they'd make a good Talk Radio pundit for that...
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:30 AM
1

My opinion is that they are not. The admins favor and censor speech based on content, either directly, or indirectly through favored intermediaries like the admins of the default subs. This. By engaging in this behaviour, they waive the rights normally granted to them through the various Safe Harbour exemptions. Without those exemptions, they then become responsible for any content they do not police off of their website. They tossed those protections out the window the moment they decided to ba…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 01:54 AM
2

I grew up the son of a corrupt cop, so I'm well aware of all the 'dirty little tricks' used to get an officer that has misbehaved off the hook. I think Officers should be held to the same standard your average citizen is. If it's illegal for a citizen to do something, then a scrap of tin on your chest in the shape of a badge does not give you some magic exemption from the law. Obviously, this does not extend to the everyday parts of a peace officer's authority, such as detaining citizens for var…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:43 PM
1

I will point out that I agree with your assertion that a police officer should not be allowed to use deadly force in that situation. I will also point out that his family would have the ability to press for legal recourse through the courts where they would get the chance to establish shooting him was not necessary. Fact remains, a cop is not the kid, and while I don't disagree with your theoretical situation, it's irrelevant to the crux of the matter. The kid felt his mother was going to be kil…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:22 PM
1

It was "Miscommunication" before they told her, outright, that the guy wasn't gay. Anything after that was plain maliciousness, and the demand that he apologize for her outright ignoring evidence that was put right before her, is a classic case of DARVO, and displays a complete lack of empathy and ability to accept responsibility for one's mistakes. When people outright tell a person, "I'm not gay," and that person chooses to ignore that, then it's ceases to be about what is and is not 'obvious'…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:27 PM
2

You are an idiot. Nah, just a troll. Look at their account history. Only 6 hours old, already -20 Karma, and only one submission in /r/confessions before not even waiting a half hour to copypaste it here. Professional jimmy-rustler gonna rustle jimmies, is all.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:40 AM
6

It's not just that, but from a typical self-defense argument, the boy escalated the use-of-force from the level of aggravated assault (A violent melee, in essence) to deadly force. One of the central requirements of a affirmative defense of a claim of self-defense (Or defense of others, as would be the case, here) is that you cannot answer force with more force than is being applied, which he clearly did. That's why the "Battered Wife Defense" is so bullshit, because it assumes that whatever for…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:27 AM
4

Tl;dr - Woman acts like an insufferable cunt, then wants to reap the benefits she was reaping before she burned her bridges by acting like an insufferable cunt. Entitled princess doesn't want to face the logical and rational consequences of her actions. Here's an experiment, go around "joking" about how she looks like a bad Trans-woman botched job, and see how funny she thinks it is. And when she comes back offended that you've been insulting her to everyone behind her back, demand an apology be…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:34 AM
7

"Victim offender reversal" isn't really a thing. It's DARVO, just by another name. Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender. Plainly put, as you mentioned, she's legitimizing her abuse of him by projecting her motives onto him, so she can paint herself as the victim to justify her mental and physical abuse of him. She's not doing anything wrong (at least in her mind), because she's the vitim, therefore, anything she does to him is justified, because it's in 'self-defense'. Manipulator/Abuse…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:25 AM
4

Really, dude? We're not a bunch of Feminists that don't understand the difference between working with generalities and saying all women are, literally, like that. The disclaimer is unnecessary, at least to anyone with half a brain. That's why you're getting downvoted into the negatives, though for my part, I left your comment score alone.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:06 AM
1

Feel free to answer when you get to a PC and off Mobile (I'm admittedly assuming that's the reason). I'd be interesting in hearing what you have to say, in response. :)
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:01 AM
1

Nope, just an idealogue intent on shutting all reasonable discussion of the topic down. Once I see thought-terminating cliche's like "Red Pill Bros", I know the person is not operating with a rational mindset, and no reasoning will be able to reach them. Bonus round: Try telling them "If women don't want the unwanted consequence of raising a child, then they shouldn't have sex. You shouldn't have sex if you can't handle the consequences that may arise from it," and watch them pitch their shit. I…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:43 AM
2

The only way you're getting equal representation in jobs like engineering and trades is if you limit the amount of men that employers are allowed to hire. To be honest, they're so rabid at this point, and politicians are so quick to attempt to appease them, that I wouldn't put it past them to try.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:17 AM
107

So instead of considering why you may have been irritated enough to revoke your regular donations, they doubled-down on the idiocy and screamed "We're right, damnit!" whilst stomping their feet? Can't say I'm surprised...critical thought has never been Social Justice's strong point.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:05 PM
4

There's a difference between a shit test and cult behavior. This is quite clearly the latter, given the obvious cognitive dissonance when confronted with evidence contrary to her assertion (i.e. "I can't deal with this right now", it's a thought-cancelling phrase meant to shut down the debate, now that she's lost the upper hand). It's not any different than the way a Young Earth Creationist will say "I don't have the time to discuss this at the moment..." when you start pointing out to them that…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 02:10 PM
1

Because that narrows her choices, since she'd have to narrow the field to men who consented to their sperm being used to impregnate women. Much better (in her mind) to discard consent altogether, because then she can take her pick of then litter from whomever she can seduce, wrap her legs around them in the throes of passion, and say in that poisoned, honeyed voice "It's okay. Do it inside me. Let it all out...I'm on the pill," and the poor sap takes the bait. Creepy as it is, this actually brin…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:35 PM
17

ChildTherapist[M] [score hidden] 28 minutes ago - stickied comment "the OP has little interest in gaining personal support for what he's been through, but instead to...rant about oppression olympics." Jesus H Christ...and we're the sociopathic, empathyless monsters with no sympathy for rape victims? If I knew a "Child Therapist" like that, I'd be calling for the professional ethics board to be revoking their license, not taking my troubled son to see them... I'm sorry you went through all that, …
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:53 AM
1

Don't bother with this concern troll, Dude41. He's just anal-burned at the reaming I gave him here. He/She's an intellectually dishonest cunt, who can't even form a coherent argument past "I'm offended", making their first post ever to this community by lecturing us as if they were a longtime contributor. Not even worth anyone's time, the only reason I wasted any on them, is because I enjoy toying with ideologues like this one. So unless that's your shtick, don't be expecting any productive conv…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:19 AM
1

But it's an argument you can't make when Klansmen keep showing up at his rallies. Are these the same Klansmen that just so happen to be African American? The ones that keep showing up, despite Trump saying he wants nothing to do with them? If those are legitimate Klansmen, and not some false flag publicity smear campaign, I have to wonder where the KKK dragged up so many Uncle Ruckus types.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:38 AM
1

So do I. Unfortunately, it seems I chased him off. Oh well. And nothing of value was lost, it seems.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:11 AM
2

Oh, this is just a goldmine of humor. It would be hilarious, if you weren't actually serious. But let's pick this apart, piece by piece... 'you're not in our club, I checked, you can't play with us' I never said anything of the sort. But I'm sure that doesn't mean anything to you, as admitting as such would mean surrendering your moral superiority high horse you judge this sub from. 'you're trying to censor us!!1! we're victims here stop tone policing!' Nah, censorship is what /r/feminism does w…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:26 PM
2

Dude, you went through my comment history? Yes, because we get a rather large number of either flamebaiters or concern trolls coming through /r/MensRights and, despite having contributed nothing to the community (Much like how this is your first submission to this sub) decide to come through and tell us all how to act, or why the anger we've seen around the sub is somehow unacceptable. Anyone who's spent even an hour listening to the stories around here, and posting in the Support/Activism threa…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:16 PM
2

Not sure I'm gonna associate myself with the MRM much longer. I only speak for myself, as far as my own assholery goes. Don't make the mistake of thinking I speak for the entire MRM. Oh, wait...you're a frequent TwoX poster, that explains the tone policing. Never mind, I thought you were seriously proposing something. TL:DR of your comment is 'be a cunt and be a loud one, because civil discussion and rhetoric are for pussies'. #Trump2016 Funny, for all the accusations TwoX throws at us of strawm…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:48 PM
1

where the public judges someone's arguments on logic and rationality, and not on the character of the person arguing, where someones' views on two different things can be separated from eachother, maybe THEN Milo Yiannopoulos would be a decent ally. Are you incapable of judging someone's arguments on logic and rationality, instead of their character? Are you incapable of separating your views on different topics? If not, then what does it matter? "The Public" always starts with the individual, a…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:08 PM
7

He's managed to make a good counter to the crazies on the Regressive Left. Furthermore, he has a valid point in that nobody agrees to debate him. Whether or not it's because they know they'll lose, is another matter, but therein lies the beauty of the simplicity of the claim. In order to prove him wrong, all they would have to do is debate him. But they won't even do the one very simple thing that would take most of the wind out of his sails, egotistically speaking. It really speaks to how much …
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:58 AM
5

You are technically correct. The best kind of correct.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:48 AM
1

AHS is run by a bunch of SRS'ers and other SJW's. It's no surprise that the three main subs known for being Anti-SJW would then be listed as "Hate Subs", especially given their propensity to not only call out the bullshit, but to back it up with evidence and statistics. Because everyone knows that facts are sexist and racist, now, when they contradict the Far Left's narrative...
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:45 AM
7

“This is unfair. This is inequitable. This is not what we should be doing now,” said Sen. Arthenia Joyner, a Tampa Democrat. “I think this is a travesty, a disgrace and a shame that we would do this to those who have given their all for their families.” What a fucking joke. You know what's unfair, Senator Joyner? What's unfair is the idea that a legal construct originally intended to simply subsidize spouses until they could get back on their feet after being freed from an abusive or troubled ma…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:25 AM
2

It sucks, but tough shit. Her body, her autonomy. You can't infringe on that to ensure the baby grows for the male without infringing on her rights to personal autonomy and integrity of her self. He can always dump her and find another woman willing to bear his offspring, if children are that important to him. I don't know why anyone would pursue that, given how much of a financial and legal liability children are in this day and age, but to each their own. However, that's the legal and moral op…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:18 PM
3

And that's where I would call out their moving of the goalposts. I didn't ask how men indirectly benefited, I asked what they have done that has directly benefited men exclusively, as a counterbalance to all the policies that have exclusively benefited women. I get what you're saying, though. And I don't delude myself by thinking that they will respond rationally or with reason...when I debate feminists, I'm really debating my audience. It's the best way to neuter this toxic ideology, is to poin…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:11 PM
5

Another one that pisses them off: "If Feminism is for both sexes, and since we already know it has done quite a bit exclusively for women (Suffrage, DV Advocacy, Rape/Sexual Assault Advocacy, etc.), then can you name one thing in the past five years, one bill they have lobbied for and pushed to the point of actual passing, that exclusively benefits men?" If they tried and failed, then Feminism is ineffectual towards righting the injustices men face in our society, and thus we are justified in fo…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:55 PM
3

To them "raised as a man" means being told the world is your oyster, that you should feel entitled to everything, especially from women. To them "raised as a woman" means being oppressed from birth, being 'shown your place' like a slave chained to a block. And told to prioritize men's wellbeing at all costs. Y'know, this is really starting to look familiar...let's play a little word game, shall we? We'll call it "Reverse the Roles".: To them "raised as a woman" means being told the world is your…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:45 PM
1

I'm not sure what your brother's disability is, so I can only make vague suggestions. Get in touch with the Dept of Health and Human Services. They have a few programs he may qualify for, if he's suffering from a mental health issue. There may be additional housing programs for physical disabilities, but you'll have to ask to find out. If they can't help, they will at least know where you can go from there. If push comes to shove, and bad to worse, and it looks like he's going to end up on the s…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:12 PM
3

What puts off white, working-class men off University? Affirmative Action ensuring unfair treatment of white men compared to women and racial minorities Imbalance in scholarships and student aid (My local University has 5 woman-only scholarships for every gender-neutral scholarship, and no male-exclusive scholarships) Gender studies departments constantly spouting how evil and violent men are, and how one could rape you at any time (Replace "men" with "Negroes" and one would think we were talkin…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:04 PM
14

taking your child away from Methhead Mom is. Kind of hard to do that when said child is embedded in her womb...
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:50 PM
2

I'm pretty sure paychecks aren't really "fat" in law enforcement until you start getting to the top of your department. Cities across the nation have been bleeding fresh recruits like crazy, because they don't pay their officers shit, and so they go on to take the higher-paying (And more exponentially dangerous) jobs in the big cities.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:44 AM
1

Three words: "Presumption of Innocence". The State has the burden of proving beyond reasonable doubt that any alleged rapists actually comitted the crimes they are being charged with. If the State cannot establish this beyond reasonable doubt, then the Court must presume the Defendant's innocence and release them. Alternatively, ask where they are getting their statistics from that say that 97% of convicted rapists are simply let back out into the populace without any jail sentence. Given the pr…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:12 PM
1

The amount of ignorance and intellectual dishonesty on display here is apalling, as in, to the point I have to wonder if you really care about this issue, if you're really looking to have a discussion, or just looking for an Outrage Moral High Horse to rail at others from. I'll give the benefit of the doubt, for one more post, and point out the flaws with this argument. vitriol and hatred every extreme theory you have submitted leading up to now to justify your argument I said "vitriol", not vit…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 11:46 AM
1

Had this not involved the courts (in Ke$ha's case specifically, I don't know enough about the Santoro case to comment on his case, and it does not change the crux of my point, anyways) I would agree with you wholeheartedly. But perjuring oneself on the stand is a serious crime, because it perverts the course of justice and ends up using the courts to send the government acting in a direction contrary to how it should, thus entrapping the populace in complicity with the lie and consequences there…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 08:10 AM
1

Did Santoro lie? If so, that makes him a liar. Did Ke$ha lie? Well, we know that the two statements she made are mutually exclusive, so they can't both be true. That means one of them must be a lie, and thus she brings the title of Liar onto herself, by nature of lying. This isn't even about gender politics, it's a matter of simple definitions. You're railing against one of the most basic ideas of language, that words are defined by the ideas they convey, just because the implications make you f…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:02 AM
1

Telling your friends a white lie for personal safety and committing perjury while testifying under oath are miles apart in difference, dude, both in the type of lies being told and the context. Fact remains, either she was lying under oath, in which case she should be tried for perjury and pay the attendant penalties for doing so, or she is lying now. If Santoro told the courts, under oath, that he wasn't involved in an abusive relationship, and then later alleged to the media that he was, I'd b…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:10 PM
1

if you think it's wrong for some feminists to call Dr Luke a rapist, isn't it wrong to call Ke$ha a liar? Not really. Video footage has been circulating of Ke$ha after the alleged abuse happened, giving testimony, under oath, that Dr. Luke did NOT sexually abuse her. The two statements are mutually exclusive. Dr. Luke can't have both sexually assaulted and not sexually assaulted her before the deposition caught on video. Either she was lying on the stand, or she's lying now. And what do you call…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:07 PM
1

Much. Though to be honest, not what I was expecting. Sarcasm is a bitch to determine without indicators in text, and Poe's Law is a bitch.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:12 AM
1

Women never lie about being raped. Lol alright, TwoXChromosomes/Feminism, whatever you say. The facts and reality beg to differ with you, but if it makes you feel better to think that, then go ahead and tell yourself that. Just stay away from the ballot box, because it's clear someone that delusional and detached from reality has no business voting.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:56 AM
1

Corrected above. See here
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:33 PM
0

The ERA, which NOW pushed for in the Senate, but failed due to refusal to compromise on some key provisions other demographics found objectionable (mostly led by Phyllis Schafly), included the requirement for women to sign up for the draft (Not explicitly, but de facto, due to an explicit statement of the equal rights of both men and women to be enforced, which by extension includes the right to sign up/join Combat MOS's, and thereby be eligible for the draft). It's also why a lot of feminists h…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:17 PM
1

Next time, don't copypaste your entire comment into the URL. It tends to break the hyperlink. FTFY http://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/neckbeard-cartoon/ Archive.is'ed: https://archive.is/z5qwh
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:06 PM
1

I don't think it's fair to take both sides of the argument. I just don't think that's how logic works. I'm not saying it is. Affirmative Action, especially, is a travesty and a slap in the face to the idea of equality, and I find myself firmly opposed to it. But, you can't promote AA, and still claim to be supportive of equal opportunity, because the very act of the government giving certain demographics a leg up achieving certain opportunities, while neglecting or refusing to help other demogra…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:57 PM
8

There's other gems in there, too, if you look. Case in point: benefit from programs like affirmative action that bolster their ability to pursue equal opportunities Let that sink in... Affirmative Action Equal Opportunities One of these thing is not like the other, and to include mutually exclusive concepts together as if they support one another, is new heights of absurdity from the Feminists. I think it's to the point where these idiots just function on autopilot. There's no possible way any r…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:27 PM
1

Actually, this is one issue that Feminism has pretty much always agreed with us on. It was the government that had said women couldn't be expected to sign up for the draft, because women didn't serve in combat MOS's on the front lines. Now that they've fully opened the combat MOS's to women, though, that final roadblock to pushing for it is gone. I suspect the reason they've been like that, though, is that it's easy to push for something, knowing that not only is it extremely unlikely that the S…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:30 PM
1

There are plenty of ways to benefit the community. The two job positions most filled by psychopaths, for example, are CEO (A position that provides all sorts of employment for those under them, as well as countless revenues of tax dollars.) and Attorney at Law. You might think having no empathy is a bad thing, but be honest here, who would you want gunning for your case in a courtroom if you were falsely on trial for rape? The attorney who empathizes with the alleged victim and her crocodile tea…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:55 AM
1

So, are you saying you want to commit every sociopath and psychopath, or just the ones that have done something to be a danger to the community?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:35 AM
1

That doesn't answer my question. What actions/crimes have all of these sociopaths and psychopaths committed, that you think it is necessary to deny them the right to be free from incarceration at government mandate without the due process of a trial justifying it?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:24 AM
1

And what has this 5% of the population done that makes them a danger to the community to justify infringing on their right to be free from incarceration without due process dictating otherwise?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:18 AM
6

1.) Had some valid points, and what few valid points they had are diluted beyond any strength of conviction by the self-serving nature, and refusal to extend the same idea to others, in which they were demanded, as well as the irresponsibility they have shown upon obtaining their demands. Power demands responsibility, else it corrupts. Case in point: Voting rights. They demanded voting rights for middle-class, white women only. If it was really about sticking up for the disenfranchised, they wou…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:03 AM
2

If she meant she didn't want irrelevant factors like clothing choice or sexual history to have an impact on rape cases, it would have been simple enough to say precisely that. "I don't want the government to be able to say, "You weren't raped because you were wearing a miniskirt," takes 2 seconds to say, but she didn't say that. She prefaced her statement with a concern of 'taking power from the people' (Which implies her problem lies with the perception of government) and then literally says "I…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:27 PM
20

I haven't even posed fully nude, but because I speak openly about sex, they assume that I am some sort of prostitute. Snow claims that the man she confronted had not only made threats to her, but also sent nude photos from her website to her family members... Can't even tell an Oppression Olympics story without telling baldfaced lies. If you've never posed for nude shots, then what in the fuck are nude shots doing on your fucking website?!? Also, love how she's so adamant about all of these repe…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:43 AM
14

No, she just challenged him to say it to her face, and when he did, she threw a hissy-fit, assaulted him, and then went crying to the ACTUAL media. She didn't face her tormentor head-on, she couldn't handle the heat, threw a temper-tantrum, and now expects everyone to take her side because someone said mean things to her on the internet. Little more than an overgrown teenager with a princess complex.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:38 AM
5

All I can go on is what she said, and without a doubt, she said she didn't want "the government" (AKA The Courts, as that is the only branch of government that can decide whether or not a crime was committed against one's person) deciding whether or not a person was raped. It seems to me a pretty clear rejection of the courts and due process. That being said, I'm wholly willing to concede I may be wrong about the second part of my analysis, but the first part was spelled out in her own words. I …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:38 AM
0

Fair enough. Fact remains, the teacher got off with barely even a slap on the wrist for multiple counts of sexual assault. Can you imagine the outrage and outcry that would erupt from a man facing several counts of sexual assault on his female students getting probation? It's just the Pussy Pass of gender disparity in sentencing coming forward, yet again. Gotta keep those women from facing proper accountability, don'cha know? /s Edit: Whomever is going through my profile and downvoting every com…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:05 PM
0

Not a hint of remorse...even gives Ducklips for her Mugshot. Because she knows she'll get off with a slap on the wrist, and nobody will hold her responsible for her crimes to the fullest extent of the law like they would if it were a man. Edit: Called it!
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:36 PM
4

Sidenote: Apparently, Automod is really touchy with what links it allows through...so let's try this again. It's a paraphrase. The source quote is in a media interview she was taking part in, the video source of which you can find here. (Automod is being a dick with Twitter links. Just follow the source URL in the Archive page, listed where it says "Saved from:") The actual quote (counter-points and context added by me in parentheses) is: Are we going to take the power away from The People (What…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:50 PM
2

there doesn't seem to be anything here Nope. Nada.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:25 PM
2

If suicides are 2/3 of firearms homocides, and the majority of those homocides are men, then why is talk of issues that drive men to suicide oddly absent from the Gun Control debate, instead of just trying to take away the means to kill oneself? You answered your own question. Your mistake is assuming it's about the victims, instead of just looking for an excuse to take away firearms from the public, law-abiding or not. If the people pushing for gun control actually cared about the victims of su…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:54 AM
7

"I was repeatedly told that this isn't a Title IX matter, and while I understand that, I am speaking my truth to make sure that our Association takes a hard look in the mirror before it claims national leadership on sexual misconduct," Creighton wrote in her letter. And that's how you know - report that reveals the case is unsubstantiated aside - that she's full of shit. She speaks of the truth as if truth is a subjective thing. It's not. Either reality fits what you claim, or it does not. Eithe…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:01 AM
2

Was relatively decent, until I got to the end: The wage gap has yet to close. Not this shit again... Subsidized daycare remains a distant dream. Why should the government subsidize your inability to effectively plan for the future, and what expenses having a child will entail? I don't get to have the government subsidize my gas expenses when I buy a gas guzzler SUV, or to subsidize my losses playing the lotto, so why should me and my money be on the hook for your bad choices? And, yes, abusers a…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 12:49 AM
3

Because 9 times out of 10, someone advocating for men’s issues is a misogynist. Citation needed. Even if we grant it as true, it does not invalidate the many issues men face. This is like saying we should ignore the issues of fatherless homes and drug use plaguing the African American community because David Duke pointed them out. Furthermore, I find it ironic. and slightly amusing, but moreso just annoying, that this big, long rant starts off with a long list of quote-mining in an attempt to pa…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:40 PM
1

stereotype that cyclists tend to be a bit louder about their rights. There's a reason for that. Locally, we had a bunch of soccer moms go to city council, and bitch to them because they didn't think they should have to move over when a cyclist comes down the bike path. City council, not wanting to rile up the hens, then passed an ordinance banning all cyclists from the city's bike paths, and then tore up all the paving that had been done, so they were just dirt walking paths. Yes, they banned bi…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:16 PM
1

rolling through stop signs, lack of signalling, going the wrong way on one way streets You mean...cyclists tend to break the law when driving on roads just like automobile drivers do? It's almost like people tend to disobey traffic laws when it's inconvenient for them, regardless of the vehicle they are driving! A 5-second youtube search shows 8,000+ videos of cars rolling through stop signs, 34,000 of them refusing to signal for various reasons, and 121,000 (!!!) of them going the wrong way dow…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:06 PM
1

With them being pro-choice overwhelmingly, I'm sure they do. But that's not the issue I'm getting at. My point is that the wording and phrasing on this sounds eerily close to a "Pro-life" poster, and that without putting any consideration to the fact that women overwhelmingly abuse/kill their children more often than men (A statistic that even you will agree, I'm sure, is sorely lacking in public awareness of its existence), the response will be a knee-jerk "Ugh, not another Anti-Planned Parenth…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 08:05 PM
0

My only objection is, given the emotional and knee-jerk reactionary tendencies of most modern college students, that this could be mistaken for a "Pro-Life" dig, as opposed to a reference to the fact that women are much more likely to abuse/kill their children. You need something that doesn't need much contemplation to get the reaction you want, and unfortunately, without consideration for precisely what this is referring to, it's likely to be discarded out of hand.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 07:07 PM
653

Approach shoplifting as an African-American issue. It involves people of all ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. View African Americans not only as perpetrators, but as empowered bystanders who can confront thieving peers. Am I reading too much into this, or is it really racist? There's your answer. Now go report this POS sign to the R.A. and the Title IX office. Things aren't going to change unless we begin making some noise about it.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:22 PM
2

She should have ended the sentence after the first 10 words. Adding on that qualifier makes it seem like she's open to changing her mind in the face of contradicting evidence.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:06 PM
16

I believe there is an oft-loved phrase the feminists of NOW, and other organizations like to use. What was it again? Oh, yes... ahem "The loss of unfair advantage does not equate to oppression of those losing their unfair advantage..." Time to practice what you preach, Fems.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:44 PM
6

He shouldn't be going to /r/relationships in the first place. That sub is an SJW hivemind-cesspit! They'd sooner tell him that if he were to prostrate himself and apologize incessantly, then turn himself into her personal doormat that she'd magically fall head over heels for him, and have Niagara Falls gushing from between her legs for him! Seriously, we need to make a Mens Rights Relationship-advice subreddit, though. We're getting a huge influx of advice threads as more people begin to see thr…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:59 AM
7

There are plenty of men out there...they just don't want to lower their standards. AKA the 57% of graduating students that are women all want men that are more educated and make more money than they do; a statistical impossibility to satisfy. It's not our problem if they don't want to "marry down", and I sure as hell don't want to hear them screeching anymore about how we, as men, should lower our own standards to wife up some post-wall Tumblr-whale, considering it's obvious they have no intenti…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 03:02 PM
5

The only reason Roosh is affiliated in any way with the MRM, is because the MSM and the feminists that have a vested interest in trying to paint him as such, continue to do so. Roosh has said, on multiple occasions, that he is not an MRA. Q: “Are you a men’s rights activist?” A: No, but I sympathize with their views. I would call myself a neomasculinist. This question has been answered so many times in this manner, that anyone claiming otherwise is either willfully ignorant or lying. I know this…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:27 PM
1

Okay, or not. Looks like he deleted his post. Go figure, the coward...
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:19 PM
1

Don't bother. PM's include a smear piece by Mic.com with a bunch of quotes taken out of context and willfully leaving out the content that shows what kind of context the phrases are put in, and a link to the RadFem-hijacked /r/lgbt. You know, the place that was infamous for letting goddamn Laurelai, of all people, run amok. I'll be dissecting the claims, one by one, after examining them. We'll see if there's anything valid there. But I don't have much hope to find anything valid, given how biase…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:02 PM
1

No problem. In all fairness, we don't have any idea what the timeframe for this was, between when he last picked up his niece, and now. It may very well be that way, and the principal may have even left in the middle of the school year (for whatever reason), even assuming they have a similar policy as yours. The only thing we can really establish is that he has picked up his niece before, and that his name is on the records to pick her up, somewhere. Other than that, we don't really have enough …
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:53 PM
0

I'm not "Promoting", it's called 'citing your sources', and not only is it something anyone with a scholarly bone in their body is familiar with, it seems to be something you are lacking at. IDGAF if your evidence comes from someone who has obtained a conviction, or an admission by Roosh himself that he 'committed rape'. I want to see some sources to back up your claim. And don't get me wrong, I dislike him, personally, but I do actually value the truth. And people that make unsubstantiated clai…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:40 PM
7

To quote: I've picked her up in the past, but under a different principal, yet the records should not have changed that I was allowed to So it seems he was in the records as having been allowed to pick up his niece, as it makes no sense to refer to records that are non-existant.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:30 PM
0

I'm a bit curious where you get this idea that he's a "serial rapist". You mean to say, with all of this hate he receives from the MSM and the Feminist movement, that not ONE woman, even despite the prevalence of false accusations, has come forward to accuse Roosh of raping her? If so, let's hear her story, because Roosh himself says he has never even been charged with rape, and that anyone that says otherwise is engaged in a malicious lie. Q: “Are you a rapist?” No. I’ve never been accused or c…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:15 PM
1

I couldn't say, as I'm not normally one to keep up-to-date on his writing. But given what I've seen of him and his writing, organizing a mass-meetup just to freak out the feminists and their cronies in the media, just for the lulz and the extra publicity, is not something I would put past him. Every smear article the MSM puts out, gets people wondering about the reason for the over-the-top rhetoric and reaction to him, and exposes his name to people who have no idea who he is. That, in turn, lik…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:00 PM
1

Nowhere does the person you linked mention these groups using the term "Men's Rights". The only thing I see is him calling for people to be able to attend their meetups unmolested by those who are ideologically opposed to them, which I agree with. Granted, I'm of the opinion that Roosh pulled that meetup gig as a way of trolling the MSM and as a way of gaining publicity for himself, but that doesn;t change the facts of the matter. Fact remains, I see no attempts to try to paint Roosh or his meet…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:43 AM
1

Be the nice guy who forces his way out of the pit at the front of the pack, then leans over to extend a hand down. Not the nice guy who waits until last and is left at the bottom alone going "Guys? Guys? Very funny... guys?" I had to learn this life lesson firsthand. My parents, the school system...every social and familial structure I ever had, had raised me to helplessly serve and help others, even at cost to myself. And did it ever breed resentment in me, when I realized most people will gobb…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:17 AM
2

Dear god, no. That cesspit would tell him that if he was her loyal doormat for long enough, that she'd magically fall ga-ga over him and would have Niagara Falls gushing from between her legs for him. Lord only knows what they'd tell her to tell him, given that she's specifically asking for the best and kindest way of turning him down. You might as well have sent her to MensLib to ask for advice...
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:00 AM
2

This needs to be voted higher. Straight to the top, if possible. Excellent post; well written, and informative while providing a perfect window into the male POV for one of the opposing gender.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:53 AM
2

Except it does have to do with him, and OP even states as much. I admit I was also a bit worried that he would hit on me. Otherwise, though, I agree completely. Be 100% honest about things, and it's up to him how he takes it.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 06:18 AM
3

Honestly? Be straight-up with him. Don't tell him you're not interested in a relationship, tell him you are not interested in a relationship WITH HIM. If he asks why, explain that he just isn't the type of guy you find attractive. That's really the best you can do, if you want to do so in a fair and just manner. The reason I make the distinction, is because you are both being honest, and if you happen to find someone that strikes your fancy soon after telling him the former, it will breed resent…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 06:14 AM
2

Okay, I'll set aside my incredulity for a second and hear you out. How?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:25 AM
11

Curious what people think of this. It's fucked. The penalties for a teacher raping their students is already harsh. The problem is that nobody wants to actually ENFORCE them when a teacher invokes her PussyPass card. This guy gets nine years and this guy gets five years while this bint got three years probation! All this bill means is rougher and longer sentences for the men that are convicted under this law. They won;t enforce the laws that are already on the books, so what use is tighter restr…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:31 AM
3

Maybe Neocons by the standards of British Politics. Here in the states, HuffPost, BBC, and Guardian are the British Papers du jour for anyone in the Regressive Left arm of the Progressive movement. Warmongering is not just a quality of the Far-Right, and I can think of several American Democrats that support military action in Syria. By American standards, they mesh perfectly with the Far/Regressive Left. Call it a side effect of Horseshoe Theory, if you must, but they practically cream themselv…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:15 PM
4

Whelp, there goes his claim to neutrality, if he's pitching for such a Far-Left publication as Guardian.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:22 PM
3

Anyone who legitimately believes that Roosh is in any way representative of the MRM (He has stated multiple times on his own blogs, that he can't stand and has absolutely nothing to do with the MRM) is either ideologically blinded by their politics, or just swallows the swill the media feeds them like the sheeple they are. They are beyond any kind of help. What's funny is that while Feminism screeches all day long about man-haters like Marilyn French and Valerie Solanas being held as representat…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:09 AM
1

It's effective discipline, so long as it's not a part of a frequent, irrational, and/or unwarranted cycle of abuse and mistreatment And you think 'beating his ass everyday, both before AND after he gets home from school', regardless of whether or not he's done anything further wrong, is not 'irrational', and will not happen 'frequently'? Yes, I'm sure it's not me who is the zealot. I'm pretty sure that 'beating a kids ass everyday' both before and after he goes to school, in an ongoing manner as…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:50 PM
1

Nice false dichotomy fallacy. I never claimed that kids had to be coddled and put into a hugbox, but you sure seem keen to put words into my mouth, just to win an internet argument. So in other words, you will go against established professional opinion, by an expert in the field, just because you "Believe" that she's wrong. I have some friends deeply into Intelligent Design and Flat-Earth theory you'd get along great with! I think we're done here. There's no discussing things with a zealot, and…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:09 PM
1

Humiliating public shaming, in itself, is abuse, especially when enacted by parent upon child. But don't take my word for it... is Psychology Today a good enough source for you? I suppose not, can't listen to those damned crazy shrinks, now can we? Who knows what insanity they'll spout next, right? Crazy professionals with their college degrees and their formal schooling...everyone knows a hickory switch and beating them within an inch of their life is MUCH more effective, right? Or how about th…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:51 PM
1

This is not abuse, just a harsh punishment. Right. Because beating a child's ass everyday, BOTH before and after school, as an ongoing punishment for one act of smoking weed is obviously a punishment that fits the crime, right? We should all follow her shining example, and permanently incarcerate any kid that happens to steal a candy-bar...after all, ongoing severe punishments without-end for a concrete, finite, and one-time mistake are obviously the way to go. Bullshit. She is delighting in hum…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:45 AM
0

The law and Courts beg to differ. Also, listen to her voice...she's WAY too happy to be doing this out of a desire to discipline, rather than to humiliate and subject him to mental shaming. Discipline is not done for a public display, as this was, but to instill into a child the fact that his behavior is unacceptable and to encourage him to refrain in the future. This isn't discipline, this is a public shaming, and one done for her sick enjoyment, rather than for the benefit of the child. Becaus…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:20 AM
7

So she basically told him to write a "reactionary blog post in response to feminism", and then proceeds to penalize him for doing precisely that? Feminism: Even when you follow the instructions you are given to the letter...if you're a man, you're still wrong. Because ebil pingas-monster is subhuman trash.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:48 PM
3

Jesus H Christ. And yet women are the ones who supposedly have it rough...fucking hell.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:35 AM
11

Wait...how can he be sentenced to be banned from the internet, if he was acquitted? Is Canada now in the business of criminally sentencing even those they have legally found to be innocent of the commission of a crime?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:51 PM
6

Gotta find some way of monetizing that Master's in Gender Studies , don't ya'know?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:49 PM
1

Then think of the current Family Court setup like making marriage akin to a gun. Sure, it's a tool, and it can be useful, under certain circumstances. However, just like with a gun, unless you hunt or live in a high-crime area where your house is likely to get broken into and robbed while you're home, the risks may outweigh the benefits, and so many Americans have chosen to forego the ownership of one...so also do the many risks of marriage point to the idea that many people should consider the …
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:44 AM
4

I never saw this coming. Most men never do. They tell themselves their girl is the exception, and then just when they least suspect it, BAM! But first thing's first. Lawyer up, cut all contact with her, make a record of any cases where she attempts to initiate contact (including getting your daughter to call you...that can also be interpreted by the courts as violating the TRO, if you answer, and it's a vile trick used by quite a few of these asshats to put the guy behind bars so the courts make…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:45 PM
7

Can they do this with no evidence of abuse ever? Absolutely. As a man, under Domestic Violence law, you are guilty until you prove yourself 100% irrefutably innocent, and sometimes not even then. It's called the "Duluth Model" and the "Primary Agressor" concept, classified under the VAWA. Lawyer up, cut all contact with her, and get ready to bite the pillow, because she's about to ram the massive broomstick that is the Family Court system in hard and dry, andb given the projection she's showing …
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:57 PM
2

The one case you linked indicated a woman who dies of natural causes, specifically a predetermined medical condition, that she disregarded in order to go on her speaking circuit. This is a woman who, against medical advice, specifically chose her death, as she knew she was in no condition to perform the actions she chose to. She did not "Die for the right to vote" any more than an addict dies "For the right to self-determine what intoxicants one can consume". She chose a course of action contrar…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 07:10 AM
1

Which does nothing to disprove my central point that the context within said claim is being made is important...context which you have gone out of your way to try to square the circle to setup a strawman to attack. Fact remains, the claim in the picture above makes absolutely zero sense in the context of being applied to Women's Suffrage in the UK. You, yourself even demonstrated this. But of course, context isn't important when it's men, now is it? You keep dodging that one particular issue, wh…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 04:20 AM
1

I'm skeptical even of that claim, that the mother paid for the phone. 2013 would have been back when smartphones were still being subsidized by the carrier, and payments were built into the contract plans. Technically speaking, the phone would have been owned by whatever service-provider/carrier they were using until the terms of the contract were up, where the customer whose name was on the contract would pay somewhere in the realm of $100-200 to pay off the rest of the cost, before ownership o…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:55 AM
1

Woman abuses the legal system by filing false charges (Claims the phone is hers, despite the man's name being on the paperwork and him paying for it), has man arrested and sent to court to "teach him a lesson". Sounds like all the other similar cases we see here on this sub to me...
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:20 AM
0

Probably because Facebook is a US company, and because, as you said, women in the UK actually DID die for the right to vote, as opposed to the US where they basically went on marches and spent the night in the pokey...oh, and actually opposed the original 15th Amendment, due to the fact it would give PoC and Poor White men the vote, as well (Which means they didn't want an equal share of the vote, they just wanted it for themselves)...but didn;t actually die because of it. Talking about Women's …
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:04 AM
2

I'm pretty sure the OP is talking about women specifically in the US, as that's the only context I have ever heard used to describe the attitude of "Men had to fight and die for their right to vote (Conscription/Draft service in the US military), Women simply asked for it to be given to them (American Suffragettes)." I can't speak for the British Suffragettes, and I'm admittedly not too educated on the history of voting rights in the UK, but at least where the American Suffragette movement is co…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:43 AM
2

Archive.is of the article in question.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:35 PM
3

This is not a valid critique, this is an attempt to drag the MRM from the realm it belongs in of advocating for men's rights, in general (Male LGBT Rights ARE Men's Rights. Same for Men of Color, Trans-Men, etc.) and into the realm of intersectionality identity politics, where it can be dismantled and hijacked by the feminist interest groups that have hijacked so many other communities. Think about it a sec...if we are to assume that everyone has, or is deserving of, equal rights, then what make…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:45 AM
1

My question is this: "Did Constand challenge Cosby's testimony, during the trial said deposition was given in?" If she accepted it back then, but is recanting it now, when she's claiming they were given to her without her knowledge, then it undermines her current claim, and Cosby should be given the benefit of reasonable doubt, and aquitted as such (Disregarding the other issue, which I will cover in a sec). Given that the testimony was made under a deal not to criminally prosecute, (Taking into…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:52 AM
4

They were quite popular back in the day as recreational drugs, similar to how MDMA is used today in Dance Clubs and Raves, Ludes were quite common in the disco and glam rock clubs of the 1970's. So no, I do not think it is outside the realm of reasonableness to believe Cosby, who grew up on disco, used Ludes recreationally, or provided them recreationally as a generic supply to anyone who asked for "drugs" while chilling with him, sexually or otherwise. The fact remains, his deposition admitted …
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:12 PM
13

She revealed in a funding campaign that long episodes, depression, and constant online harassment... Long episodes? Sargon of Akkad puts out several ~30 min shows per week so just how much time is she expecting to say is "Too stressful" to complete? Harrassment? She openly admits she censors her comment sections, assuming she allows any commentary at all. She refuses to directly address any of her critics, no matter how salient said criticism may be, and she has the UN on her shoulder, ready to …
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:54 PM
1

I've read it, in my own time finding out what the sub was about. I saw enough during my time there to convince me the place might as well have been /r/Feminism wearing a paper mask of Paul Elam, with a veneer of caring to the plight of men about as thick. But that's irrelevant to the matter at hand. This will be my final response until you present the evidence to properly support your claim. Good day.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:15 PM
1

Given the mods post things that challenge the feminist party line on DV And yet you have yet to demonstrate this in any provable fashion... As I said, Evidence: Do you have it? If not, then good day.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:09 PM
1

I agree that they prioritize feminism over men, what you initially claimed - that anything that contradicts the feminist narrative is deleted is not. Unfortunately for your assertion, the experiment proved you wrong, by your own metrics. Namely these: "If this post there is deleted and the user banned, you are right and they ban anything that challenges the typical feminist party line..." The OP in the link you gave is listed nowhere in the mod list. Not only does the experiment you yourself sug…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:54 AM
1

Fact remains, by your own metrics, as specified earlier, that they prioritize feminism over the idea of men's rights. The MRM ill needs a feminism board posing as a men's rights board. The Republican Party might as well put up a discussion board extolling the virtues of Marx and Lenin! It just goes to show that those Social Justice zealots can't help but attempt to assimilate every community out there, even those they are ideologically oppositional to. I hear their droning buzzwords these days, …
/r/MensRights11/01/16 10:26 AM
1

https:// .reddit.com/r/ MensLib/comments/3zuqij/what_do_you_people_consider_to_be_the_leading/ Surprise surprise! 72 hours later, and not only is the thread locked with several reasonable comments removed, but the OP has been deleted. I believe my theory stands supported by the evidence, using the experiment you yourself proposed.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:12 AM
39

I'll do you one better. You don't even have to jack into a condom, to be held responsible for child support. You can be a minor, the victim of statutory rape, and when you turn 18, you will have to begin paying child support to the rapist who victimized you as a child and impregnated herself in the process...all "for the best interests of the child".
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:08 AM
1

Why even deal with the "Oppression Hierarchy" at all, in the first place? She is a violent criminal, allegedly guilty of aggravated assault and battery, armed robbery, assault with a deadly weapon (One whack upside the head with that cane could be all it takes to crack his melon open and end him) and though I hesitate to attribute it due to disagreeing with the premise of the charge, though it is within the scope of the law so I will go ahead and at least mention it, a hate crime escalation due …
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:59 AM
16

When feminist writer Gloria Steinem said in the Seventies that 'we're becoming the men we wanted to marry,' even she can't have predicted this. 'We were reminded by our teachers that we had opportunities our mothers, grandmothers and great-grandmothers never had.' And yet what they are griping about is precisely what men, and those wise mothers, grandmothers, and great-grandmothers had been predicting and warning those "Strong, empowered women-types" would happen for decades! Boo-fucking-hoo, cr…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:40 PM
1

Commenting for reminder to check back, as well as to note that I accept the challenge you propose. I give it 72 hours, being generous, before it's taken down. If it has not, then I will re-examine my stance on that sub. However, note that since it already links to several SRS-affiliated subs in the sidebar, and this link from their sidebar openly directs people to SRSmen, that I am still extremely skeptical, here. Time will tell, I suppose. Edit: Looks like they're already laying into OP, simply…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:14 AM
2

If that's your prerogative, sure. But given their propensity to banhammer anything that challenges the feminist narrative of "Women-Victim/Man-Oppressor", which by definition includes statistics that disprove the typical feminist party-line, I'd say it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:41 AM
1

Worse...Hank can at least look at a situation after-the-fact and admit he was wrong. Try getting any feminist to do the same. Valenti after the Duke Lacrosse scandal comes to mind, or any prominent feminist writer after they joined the baying lynch mob in a false accusation case...
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:37 AM
2

The funny thing, is they actually made it illegal to pay women differently for the same work, due to gender. It was passed in a little law called, wait for it, the "Equal Pay For Equal Work Act". The way this little bit of solipsism works, is they calculate this "wage gap" by saying "Women earn less than men for work", then what they do is they lump the wages of all women (who are mostly engaged in low-paying, entry level, and/or burger-flipper-type jobs) together with the wages of all men (who …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:35 AM
2

So if MensLib is more about propagating/defending Feminism and not about Men's Rights (Or "Liberation", as they claim...some would claim this ideological alliance with Feminism would make it the antithesis of it's namesake, after all), then why should we bother with it at all as anything other than an occasional source of humor?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:07 AM
2

And what about areas where feminists actually have things to answer for, such as the insistence of continuance of the kangaroo courts in American universities, or NOW demanding a veto of the Florida family court reform bill that makes shared custody (50/50) the default unless the best interest of the child demands otherwise? They don't want due process and/or equality, especially in these particular issues. Feminism is not some uncriticizable, unaccountable political movement, immune from critic…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 02:55 AM
4

Don't kid yourself. This sub isn't about men's rights. This sub doesn't give a shit about men's rights. It is exclusively about hating feminism. I would beg to differ. But then again, I wouldn't expect a user so highly upvoted for submissions and posts to AMR to really grasp what goes on in the MRM subs anyways, with how much of an irrational and emotional hard-on-hate-on they have for anything even remotely resembling MRM or Redpill-ish material. What's the matter, did Saint Anita forget to giv…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 02:47 AM
1

If you're the one countering her claims, which are quoted above, then the burden of proof is not on you, but her, as she is the one making the initial claims...and I think she's got quite the goalpost to clear, if she wants to claim nonsense like "77% of men think rape is OK". There is literally no way that could be accurate. To give just one example, a 77% majority could easily act as a voting bloc to get the laws criminalizing rape repealed; at the very least, you'd hear about bills for it put…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:10 PM
1

Why anyone takes Carrier seriously after the "intellectual artillery" debacle that was Atheism+ and the Shermer False Rape accusations, I have no clue...why is this guy still relevant, again?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:11 AM
4

RoK has been saying this for years; this bit is nothing new. If you're just now picking up on the fact that they are not an MRA site, then either you haven't been paying attention, or you've kept yourself willfully blind to reality. No matter how often we reiterate that RoK is unaffiliated with the MRM, the ideologues refuse to listen, and lump us in with Roosh V anyways. After all, it's much easier to demonize a political demographic, instead of listening to their concerns, when you stereotypic…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:57 AM
2

I was referring more to Reddit's seaworthiness as it's viability as a aggregator site (An aggregator site with hardly any active userbase, a la Digg, is just about as useful as a boat with more holes than swiss cheese), but I think we're generally focusing on the same general, overall point. It's sad to see Reddit go this way. But even the mightiest empires must eventually come to an end, I suppose. It was good while it lasted, so all I can say in the end is "Gentlemen, it was a privilege playin…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 10:23 PM
2

What's funny is that it will be a Pyrrhic victory. The way Reddit is approaching these policy-changes amounts to using the onboard cannons to get rid of a rat infestation onboard the ship. Sure, you can celebrate when you finally nail the last rat with a cannonball, but it means very little, in the end, if your ship is chock full of holes and sinking into the briny deep towards Davy Jones' Locker...or in the Reddit equivalent, the users all jump ship to go elsewhere because Reddit abandoned the …
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:12 PM
2

Only if you disregard the divorce that will more-than-likely be even more inevitable, as a result. Marriage counseling is notoriously ineffective, and due to the active nature many incompetent and unprofessional therapists take in undermining the relationship (thus further sabotaging the marriage), more often than not end up in divorce. So just going by the numbers, he'd be stuck with the bill for a marriage counselor, AND Alimony/Spousal/Child Support.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:45 AM
2

you're lecturing me... Ummm, say what? Last I checked, I was just stating my viewpoint and having a discussion. If you think I am, in any way, lecturing you, then I think that says more about you than it does me. Lighten up, bro. Just because someone doesn't see things 100% the same as you do, doesn't mean they're talking down to you.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 04:58 AM
2

You expect more from the parent of a 19 year old? Frankly, yes. I expect the parents to relax and take a more wisdom-based guidance role, to be there to offer their wisdom, not to keep treating their child to lectures as if he were still 10. I understand that old habits die hard, but that's not a valid excuse for that kind of behavior. On the other points, we're in agreement. However, I feel compelled to point out that it's not OP's father that's trying to shame him into being alright with his m…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:17 AM
2

Doesn't matter. She's not the one who will incur the cost of raising the kid. She's not the one who will have her financial, emotional, and intimate stability thrown into absolute chaos by the sudden arrival of a kid she hadn't planned for. She is effectively trying to dictate how her son lives his life, simply to suit some selfish desire to fulfill some grandparental fantasy. Whether or not she gets a grandchild, is not her concern. Great for her, if she gets one, but that's OP's and his GF's d…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 10:55 PM
2

My guess is bias and vested interest. Feminism doesn't make much sense as an advocacy movement for equality, now that it is literally illegal to discriminate based upon gender, and those who do face huge penalties for doing so. However, if you view Feminism as a Political Action/Special Interest group, then suddenly their actions make a world's difference of more sense. The "Campus Rape" movement is all about removing the risk of being hit on by creepy men, and removing the risk of girls being s…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:08 PM
2

My thoughts: Relationships are a type of contract. Both parties agree to submit to certain conditions in exchange for certain benefits from the exchange, whether that be emotional, physical, or economic benefits. If either party is unsatisfied with the terms and conditions of the relationship contract, at any time, they are free to walk away at any time, and end the relationship (Unless they are legally married, and that is only because a legal, more formal contract, takes prescience over the re…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 06:16 PM
3

I would like to see specifics on the study, such as sample size (the value of n where n equals the number of participants/products surveyed), the types of products analyzed (AKA Did they just look at a bunch of things more expensive for women like health insurance, or did they balance out the women's expensive products with products typically more expensive for men, such as car insurance?), etc. But just going by the wording of the study's allegation, I can already see a big problem... Women pay…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 05:45 PM
12

She made the day-to-day internet, the executive offices of Silicon Valley finance and the broad swath of life in between incrementally more hospitable for women. Ummm, how, precisely? By demonstrating her complete and utter ineptitude at the helm of Reddit, as a Female Executive? By pressing frivolous and baseless sexual discrimination lawsuits, thus furthering the corporate-culture stereotype of a woman in the office just being a walking-frivolous-greivance-lawsuit just waiting to happen, who w…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 10:19 AM
13

Women's Medical Care: "My body, My choice, asshole!" Men's Medical Care: "You have to get OUR permission before your doctor assigns you medical care, dickwad!" Ladies and Gentlemen, Feminist Logic and "Equality" under the Law.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:10 AM
2

The twisted part, is that lying to get an innocent child locked up then listed as a sex offender for the rest of his life, all to settle an unrelated personal vendetta with me, is probably the thing that would make her seem the absolute least fit to take care of them, in my eyes. If she will completely ruin the life of someone who wasn't even related to me, just because she was pissed at me, how do I know she won't do worse to my children, because she is pissed at me?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 09:27 PM
1

Unfortunately, the entitled, whether male or female is irrelevant, tend to have a rather low quantity of self-awareness, and don't really tend to see when they're being hypocrites. It does make for some good lulz for those from outside the situation, though.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:24 AM
1

Actually, yes. In fact, I'll do you one better...the reason you will find some of my posts to /r/RaisedByNarcissists, if you go through my post history, is because the Nparent in question was the corrupt cop I had for a father, with a penchant for "Enhanced Interrogation". And he was not above turning his sadism against his own child. So yes, whether you want to consider if it has been formal interrogation in "just a friendly chat down at the precinct", or the more shadowy shit that goes on behi…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:19 AM
1

Paraphrased from the stereotypical line used when "Nice Guys" rant about just being used and strung along. The source line is more like "Instead of blaming all women for your shitty experiences with some of them, perhaps you should pursue better women. Don't be a bigot. Man up, and realize where your personal choices in women you pursue have caused you grief, and change those choices." Which, to be fair, I do think they have a point, on this matter. If a woman just sees a guy as an ATM or a Beas…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:54 AM
2

Rule #1 of Adulthood: If absolutely everyone you meet is an utter and irredeemable asshole, chances are the real asshole is you. ---Or--- To borrow a line from the Feminist playbook: "Perhaps, instead of blaming an entire gender for your shitty experience with some of them, you should make an effort to meet better members of that gender? Blaming an entire gender for the crimes of the few of them that do so is sexist. Instead of blaming all men for your troubles, go out, change your standards, an…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:54 PM
5

...she gave in and told them what they wanted to hear, that she made it all up. So, just to be clear...she tells the police that she is filing a false police report, in essence confessing to the commission of a crime...and then is surprised when they file charges after having obtained a confession of having committed a crime? I get that the confession is false, but what in the hell did she think was going to happen? Oh, that's right, we don't usually charge people for making false rape charges t…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 08:13 AM
2

It's decent enough. I'm much more comfortable in an environment where free discussion is unhindered, so even if we do have the MH101 spammers and the occasional blatant racist pop up in the comments, they're easily enough ignored for the more productive conversation. You've got a very strong Pro-Trump contingency on par with the Sanders crowd here on Reddit, but otherwise /v/politics is a good place to discuss and debate. If you enjoy a place where you don't have to walk on PC Eggshells, it's a …
/r/MensRights13/12/15 09:09 PM
2

I've been spending more and more time on Voat recently, so perhaps there's been a shift in my absence. All I can speak for is before I began making the shift to Voat, and as for that, the sentiment was near-rabid. In fact, it was a major factor in my shift towards Voat. So yeah, while I will readily concede that Reddit may have chilled within the past 4-5 months or so on the topics of feminism and "social justice", we'll have to agree to disagree, as my experience screams to the contrary, especi…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:09 AM
8

Was more metraphorical than literal, but eh, I'm not going to complain. :) My point stands, welcome to the show. You'll laugh at the absurdity, you'll cry at the horrificness that mainstream society tries to ignore or sweep under the rug, and if you keep your eyes and ears open, you'll learn quite a bit. Welcome out of Plato's Cave, so to speak.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:11 AM
27

We catch a bad rep from the rest of Reddit because we don't like to "Listen and Believe" like much of the rest of Reddit does (sometimes because we've been the victim of that very same mentality, firsthand, a la frivolous harassment or false accusation cases), but no, we're generally not any more sexist than any of the other subs out there. Smear jobs are real, and those who would love to see the Men's Rights subs silenced, or otherwise socially ostracized lay it on thick. Glad to see you decide…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:02 AM
1

Fair enough, then. I was thinking you were talking about a legend where she was actually listed as such. Despite being an atheist, I tend to take a fascination with the legends and myths of the religions of yesteryear. They make for interesting tales, at least. And tales revolving around the Lilim and their mother are especially no exception.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:21 PM
0

Source on Lesbo-Lillith? The mythos I've always read seems to portray her more as the neglected wife, sick of putting up with Adam's demands of providing sex, solely on his terms alone. So she left Paradise of her own accord, preferring to be alone rather than put up with Adam's shit. After that, she apparently started up a relationship with a "Being of Light", which may or may not be a djinn or daemon, depending on who you ask...but this is the first time I've ever heard of Lilith herself being…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:11 PM
1

This is an analogy I often use when explaining the lack of desirable mates to the older generations today. Feel free to use it applicably. "I want you to consider the following. There's a business investment opportunity you have the potential to enter into, as a financial partner. Now, if this business venture succeeds, you stand to gain quite a bit of capital by it's success. If it fails, however, you stand to lose 75% of your assets, and depending on how far into the venture you invested (AKA …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:54 PM
0

I see you're from the UK. I can't comment much on he state of UK politics, being an American, but I will point out that in the USA, women have the right to get an abortion. It was established in Roe vs Wade. Long story short, the only demographic really pushing hard against a woman's right to self-determination over her own medical choices are the Evangelical Republicans. The liberal Democrats are largely joined in agreement by the libertarian-conservatives that women have this right, as does an…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:42 PM
3

Many accusations are simply done within a community and never reach the scrutiny of the legal system. We currently have the means to handle such a thing within the bounds of the courts. It's called Slander, or if written, Libel (Collectively classes under the catcha-all term "Defamation"). If a man is being falsely accused in a social setting and can demonstrate as such, he can take out a civil suit on the false accuser, insisting that they prove their case. The main defense against a Defamation…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:08 PM
2

Just to provide a bit more context, SPJ is the one hosting Airplay, as a way to try to get all the issues with GG out in the open. GG is not, I repeat, NOT hosting this event, and the hosts should not be seen as inherently pro-GG. In fact, many in GG/KiA have been skeptical of their intentions. But because the SPJ is giving GG'ers a platform to speak their opinions, like the venue that let Warren Farrell speak, to the SJW Feminists, it's inherently "Hateful" and must be shut down.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:25 PM
3

Yeah, that's the rub. If there's a secular support group, or secular rehab available, they can def order you to attend, or just to attend a "Support Group". The issue comes when 12-Step groups are the ONLY support groups, and it becomes a de facto establishment of a religious/quasi-religious group, much like if you allow religious monuments on public property, you must allow all who wish to erect monuments to go through the same process, as Oklahoma found out.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:02 AM
2

they definitely do order people to attend AA. And those judges violate the law, just like this one has. Case law has established, over several cases in various circuits, and all have ruled against the constitutionality of coercing Defendants to attend AA as an alternative to incarceration, or other sentencing. As for whether or not they are religious in nature, I believe you are misinformed. I highly suggest you read up on the matter as both academics and the courts both agree that AA is religio…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:46 PM
3

Judges in the US do order people to attend AA all the time. And those judges violate the law, just like this one has. Case law has established, over several cases in various circuits, and all have ruled against the constitutionality of coercing Defendants to attend AA as an alternative to incarceration, or other sentencing.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:40 PM
63

Yes, it's a blatant violation of the Establishment Clause enshrined in the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, and pretty much the same reason why a judge cannot order you to attend Alcoholics Anonymous, specifically (AA is a known religious group, and recognized as such by the courts).
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:33 PM
2

Nah, Blue cares too much about logic and being educated to fit this guy, or any SJW archetype, for that matter. However, White fits him and his ilk, to a key... White magic heals and protects and is often a force for justice and honor. (It's in the name, "Social Justice Warrior", warriors typically being an honor-class) When a white mage fights, legions of troops thunder across the battlefield with their banners held high. (Twitter mob, anyone?) When white unleashes its wrath, the battlefield is…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:33 PM
5

I am aware, and I'm not disputing that. My only suggestion is, regardless of what you have agreed to, verbally, it never hurts to take steps to protect your own financial interests. Consider it a form of "Insurance", if you will, you hope you'll never have to cash out the policy, but if the event ever comes around, at least you have something to protect you from the fallout. Literally millions of men have taken the same stance you currently do, and been horrifically and even suicidally disappoin…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:10 PM
12

Never underestimate what agreements humans are willing to break, when it comes to personal gain. You will be surprised how quickly the vast majority of people will drop any presumption of principle and moral codes when dollar signs are dangled in front of their eyes.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 08:45 PM
2

I got news for her. Look in the bottom row. That's not "Vitriol". Dunno what it is, but it's not "vitriol", that's for sure. The special snowflake can't even get Tumblr right...
/r/MensRights24/07/15 08:21 AM
2

Perhaps I misinterpreted what you originally meant. Wu definitely has my attention, from admitting she was wrong, that much is certain. Where her standing goes from there, however, is a matter of the actions she chooses to take, from this point onwards, though. Her words, and the actions performed by publishing her words, have cause so much harm, though, that anything short of actions seeking to repair that damage, is going to come across as cheap talk. Wu and their ilk have clamored for equalit…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:35 PM
2

Sorry, Karen. Normally, I think you're right on-point, but I must disagree. Let's not deny Wu their agency in this situation. If she does that, it will be because she values the connections she has in the "Social Justice" crowd more than she does intellectual honesty. It will be her choice to do so, because regardless of whether or not her fellow White Knights and SJW's go the route of 'Shame and Blame', nobody is forcing her to push that flawed narrative...that's all her decision, in the end. A…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:42 PM
4

Your point IS clear, and I concur. My point, however, is that it's not generally us pushing that narrative, it's the Gender Politics ideologues, and only when it's to their advantage to. If they want to adhere to EPfEW, then they need to apply the standard across the board, not just when it's convenient for them to. Edit: Spelling
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:33 AM
8

Oh? Somebody seems to have forgotten to give Venus, here, the memo. Made even more inexcusable by the fact that Women's sets are best-of-3 while Men's sets are best-of-5, making even her immediate argument bunk, on it's face.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:32 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're still here, but I'll leave my $0.02 just in case you see it. GTFO. Seriously. This is going to end one of two ways. With you in jail or in an early grave, likely with her cashing out a very nice life insurance sum. What you are experiencing is not "Love", it is a classic sign of Stockholm Syndrome. I don't know what your religious proclivities are, and I frankly don't care. But head over to /r/atheisthavens and see what you can do about finding someone in the area to give …
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:31 AM
8

Have these people never heard of Article 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment? AKA the Equal Protection Clause...? All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor d…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:31 AM
2

The way I look at it, if they're SJW Mods and willing to be petty enough to pull that shit, I don't want to be a part of their community. They do me a favor by opting me out of the drama pre-emptively. Ain't nobody got time for that SJW bullshit. And if I must visit a community topic they mod over? I simply go to the applicable subverse on Voat. SJW's are slowly choking the life out of Reddit and turning it into Digg. I've already got one foot out the door. If the hammer falls, so be it, I'll mi…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:25 AM
2

Food service is notoriously Non-Union Labor in the USA. In theory, this is highly illegal and the place could easily be reported to the Labor Board. In practice, because he isn't a woman or a minority, they're not going to give two shits and will likely laugh him out of the office he goes into to report it. Can confirm, went through this whole shitstorm, myself, during my own stint at a sports bar. "Equal Opportunity Employment" is the biggest load of bollocks since that crazy dude down the road…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:17 AM
2

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess this applies more to a place like Hooters than your typical hole-in-the-wall bar-and-billiards or even some place like Ruby Tuesday's. Places like Ruby Tuesday's are family diner-type establishments, and thus no overt reason to use an exclusively-female bartender setup. If challenged in court, the employer is going to have to show how his business model is based on female bartenders, and if 33% of his bar staff is male, I don't think they'll be able to suc…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:06 AM
2

I appreciate your candor. Don't be afraid to stand up for what you think is right. If people oppose you, make them state why, before you take them seriously. If all they can do is point at your posting history, as a rebuttal to your points, then they don't really have an argument against your points at all. Ad hominem attacks are very much a thing these days, and the state of civil debate isn't going to get any better if we let those that enjoy the fallacy as a legit debate tactic continue to pu…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:00 AM
4

Quite a few of us ended up here the same way you did. Myself, in particular, I simply had what I considered to be several valid points of criticism for Feminism (Wage Gap myth and the 1-in-5 Rape Culture myth are both factoids I challenged long before ending up here), and I repeatedly got called "MRA Scum" for my efforts. I decided to look up wtf MRA stood for, and well...originally, I had only considered myself a neutral critic of feminism calling out bullshit statistics. But if all the Fems ar…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:17 PM
9

Rational Wiki has no credibility or is even considered "rational", by any measure of the word, except by those already under the thrall of Social Justice dogma. Atheism+ and it's affiliates have long been running gags in the skeptic/agnostic/atheist communities, and many of the same faces that were involved in A+ (Rebecca Watson, to name one particular individual) later went on to become the opposition to GamerGate when the RadFems and their cronies turned their attention to video games. Look up…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:35 AM
1

I'll just leave this here, as a reminder of what PPG used to portray Feminism as... (The fun starts @ 10:25)
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:02 AM
18

MRA's consistently and intentionally disregard the struggles faced by...Homeless men... MRA's are not providing any solutions That's funny, I thought the MHRM had been advocating for quite some time for male-exclusive shelters, both for homeless and victims of domestic violence. It's almost like they haven't listened to a word we've said. /s [Edit]: Bonus Round! The solutions that are proposed are ineffective and hurt more vulnerable and marginalized men. MRA's are not providing any solutions. W…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:38 AM
2

Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. But I do think there is something to be said about common sense, and fake gun or not, if he had actually set foot on school property, he should have known that in today's "Zero Tolerance" world of school policy, even a fake gun would have been taken as a serious threat. Most folks don't even know how to hold a rifle these days, much less tell the difference between a movie replica and the real thing. In absence of the ability to tell the difference, they're going to d…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:49 AM
9

She's at a convention, where people regularly dress up in cosplay like Stormtrooper uniforms. The lanyard dangling from the rifle is a dead giveaway (I'm willing to wager that's an Attendance Badge). Big difference to walking by a school, not that I think this story is justifiable, that is. My main question is this...was he actually on school property, or did he just walk past the school up at streetside as he went to show his friends the uniform?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:28 PM
2

Absolvement: Noun, 1. Act of absolving; absolution
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:54 PM
3

But porn is art...it's a video depiction of the human form in its most primal, basic, and sexual nature. One could even argue that unless an art piece is in some way controversial, it is not art. This would be supported by the struggles many actual artists went through during their lives, such as Caravaggio and Michelangelo, in their disputes with the Church over their artwork (Specifically and respectively, to name single cases, "The Death of the Virgin" and "The Last Judgement").
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:34 PM
10

Mental illness is not an absolvement from responsibility for your actions, unless that illness diminishes the ability to tell Right from Wrong. Given that she understands that Rape is an objective Wrong, I don't think that argument can be made, here. And if she can legitimately claim criminal insanity, then she belongs in a State-run Facility, not an Ivy League university where she has the potential to cause more harm to society.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:26 PM
1

Jefferson raised several valid concerns that still apply today. Especially his concerns about big businesses, "And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." (Cited from his letter to John Taylor) I agree that wage slavery is hardly supportive of individual independence, but until relatively recently, it…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:15 AM
1

"traditional conservatives" were very much in favour of massive state power provided it was used to certain ends: policing, war, counter-intelligence against leftists, anti-labour policies etc. For what it's worth, I consider myself an Old-school Conservative, but am very pro-Union, in theory. I take issue with the historically more corrupt unions like UAW, but I do support the right to organize, as Labor, to negotiate contracts with management. It's simple Freedom of Association. It should be s…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:17 AM
2

When I say "Conservative", I'm not talking about the Neocon's that took over the Republican Party post-selling-out to Falwell and his ilk. I'm referring to the old-school brand of Conservatism favored by types such as Barry Goldwater. I make no secret of my view of the current Republican party of having sold out to the Theocrats and other "Big Government" types. However, to address your point, note that all of those policies by the Authoritarian Right are modeled around the intent of keeping ord…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:00 AM
5

The way US Politics is setup makes for an interesting analysis, in regards to Feminism and Left-Right politics. Left-wing politics have typically been about challenging the established order of things, hence the supporters of the French Revolution being Left-wing, the Revolution being the originator event of the Left-Right spectrum. Supporters of the King were seen as Right-wing, as they supported the established order, and had more respect for precedent and tradition, preferring to work reforms…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:59 PM
3

My response, in how I deal with those disingenuous, "useful idiots" who like to claim "B-but...Feminism is for men, too! Feminism fights P-p-Patriarchy, and men are hurt by Patriarchy, too!": "Oh? Then you won't have any problem pointing me to one policy pushed for, and enacted into law as a result of that push, by a major, exclusively-feminist organization like NOW or the Feminist Majority Foundation, that has solely benefited men by fixing a problem exclusively faced by men, since the turn of …
/r/MensRights31/05/15 11:48 PM
11

So she cherry-picks some random Blogspot post from a corner of the internet well-known for it's feminist bias (What kind of mainstream source for the Manosphere is We Hunted the Mammoth, anyways? And Ctrl-F'ing for the comments WHtM cites shows nothing on the page linked) and then immediately launches into an invective saying it's not cherry-picking because the sentiment is allegedly "Commonplace in the manosphere to the point of dullness" without providing any evidence or sources to back up sai…
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:40 PM
2

They aren't even trying to hide the fact that it's men they want to target with this bill. To quote from the article (emphasis mine)... Introduced late last year by Assemblyman Troy Singleton, D-Burlington, the bill would make "sexual assault by fraud" a punishable offense. The bill defines it as "an act of sexual penetration to which a person has given consent because the actor has misrepresented the purpose of the act or has represented he is someone he is not."
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:17 PM
2

Right-leaning Libertarian/Old-school Conservative reporting in. As long as you're concerned with helping to fix the issues men currently face in our system, and don't try to use the MRM as a way to shoehorn specifically left-wing policies unrelated to Men's Rights, I don't see where there's any issue. It's often been said that politics makes for strange bedfellows (I often find myself voting Democrat, due to my disgust with the current nature of the GOP, or God's Obnoxious Pundits, and really do…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:09 PM
2

I'm just gonna let it be for now. If she tries to come back this is something I could hold over her head. Like "hey, I kept up my end of the deal. Do the same and kick rocks" That's the approach I would take with it, in all honesty. You have more pressing matters now, namely raising your little one and providing a stable life for her. Life is too short to live in the past, especially when others depend on you. As you've figured, this scenario works best to your advantage as a type of "Insurance …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:22 PM
4

This is just my $0.02, take it or leave it. You made a deal with your ex. While you may have legal standing to press the issue, morally you would be going against your word. I'm sure she would be even quicker to disregard her promises, but that's all the more reason why you should hold firm to your own. If you engage in the same solipsism, all you are doing is sinking to her level, and tarnishing your own reputation as a man of your word to gain some ephemeral satisfaction. Your reputation is al…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:58 PM
1

Revenge Porn and CP are nowhere near the same, in levels of moral wrongness. If you seriously think revenge porn is anywhere close to the levels of moral turpitude of producing a video where a child must be raped to make it, then your moral compass is seriously skewed. To further illustrate your disconnect from reality, you'll note that while Missouri has laws against Child Pornography, they do not have laws against Revenge Porn. The two concepts are nowhere near the same, else they would alread…
/r/PussyPass28/04/15 09:22 AM
1

i feel like you're ignoring the immorality of posting someone's nudes on the internet without consent And I'm pretty sure you're looking for anyway you can to whitewash the fact that the girl is a producer and distributor of child pornography. And no, we can't "Forget about the whole child porn thing for a minute", because that issue is central to the entire scenario. If production and distribution of Child Porn wasn't illegal, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Furthermore, your simile…
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 10:26 PM
3

I think I remember that case. Wasn't that the one where they wanted to get a warrant to jab a needle into his junk and force him to have an erection so they could take photographs of his underage dick, under the weird justification that this would somehow prove that the dick in the picture was his? Yeah, like we could ever see officers strapping a girl down and forcing her to get sopping wet down below via stimulation, just to prove that the Box-Shot she sent the kid down the street is actually …
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 10:05 PM
1

Link related
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:47 PM
5

The Weekly speculates that Gibson suffers from a psychological condition called factitious disorder or Munchausen syndrome where sufferers feign disease or illness to gain attention. Or as it's known in the more common parlance, "Being an insufferable, self-absorbed, delusional and narcissistic cunt".
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 10:04 PM
2

But the suspicion of a pussy pass on the part of the judge seems to be unlikely given his attitude in the 2nd link I posted A fair enough criticism. Aside from the idea that even criminals sometimes perform charitable acts, if only to ease their conscience, I've got nothing to rebut that. I'm not arguing against your posting this the southern US judicial system is deserving of some kind of award for Excellence in Fuckery. Fair enough, then. The Moderator tag made me suspect it was coming from an…
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 09:23 PM
4

Personally, I'm a bit curious as to why they dropped the charge against her, given that accomplices are held as guilty as the primary, when a crime has been committed. If info comes out giving another reason for why she was given leniency, especially given that the law insists she be held just as culpable as the principal for the actions committed, than simply being female, then feel free to remove the submission. Until then, I still say it reeks of the preferential treatment women receive by ou…
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 07:10 PM
6

I can't wait for the Feminists to come out decrying how this woman was treated unfairly and unequally by the sexist criminal justice system. After all, that's what they want, right? Equal recognition under the law... I won't hold my breath.
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 05:45 PM
1

Preaching to the choir, my friend. Preaching to the choir.
/r/PussyPass19/04/15 10:46 AM
9

She was convicted of rape and did three months, with most of her sentence suspended on condition she stay away from the kid. Disgusting, and yet the Femicrazies say it's the men that get off easy...I've never heard of a convicted male rapist that got 3 FUCKING MONTHS, most of it suspended, as their sentencing for their crime.
/r/PussyPass18/04/15 08:41 AM
9

Frequent poster on /r/news, here. I'm critical against police overreach and the Thin Blue Line, but not even I can find anything wrong with how this LEO handled the situation. Gotta love the guys at the 2:08 mark chuckling over the guy flipping his shit over a standard arrest that she brought on herself. She's a woman! Welcome to Gender Equality! If you're going to resist arrest, you're going to get tased just like a man would...sucks, doesn't it, Missy? My kudos to the Fort Wayne Police Departm…
/r/PussyPass13/04/15 04:16 AM
6

"We're leaving..." No you're not, you're standing there arguing with the cop! If you were leaving you'd already be getting into your car by now!
/r/PussyPass13/04/15 04:02 AM
5

At U.Va., the definition of lying entails "the misrepresentation of one or more facts in order to gain a benefit or harm another person, where the actor knows or should know that the misrepresentation will be relied upon by another person." Virginia has the oldest student-run honor code in the country, which prohibits lying, cheating and stealing. Those who are found guilty of violations by a panel of students are faced with a single penalty: expulsion. Jefferson must be rolling in his grave...t…
/r/PussyPass11/04/15 09:38 AM
20

Okay, not that I disagree with the overarching point, but is this some obscure satire site? "Scientific Study Reveals that Homosexuality Is Extremely Contagious"? Seriously? How can this site possibly be considered reliable?
/r/PussyPass06/04/15 10:28 PM
1

You got a source for that? Real world experience, and common sense. Sadly, I don't think that's a statistics set that they collect numbers on, so I wouldn't be able to provide hardcore numbers, even if I wanted to. Fact remains, marriage was instituted, in part, as a way to give financial security to the women entering into the contract. As a result, it's counterproductive to marry a man who comes from a lower financial class than yourself. This is not to say that some don't do it, only to say t…
/r/PussyPass03/04/15 03:29 PM
1

Here's the primary problem with Marriage, as a modern concept. When you sign a marriage license, you take on certain liabilities. If, for whatever reason, your newlywed bride decides she no longer wants to be legally bound to you, she gets to A) File for divorce, which is not in and of itself a problem, but what comes with that, B) File for "Spousal Support", because she's no longer living the cushy lifestyle she had under your roof, therefore you must provide that lifestyle for her despite the …
/r/PussyPass03/04/15 06:14 AM
0

Somebody either lacks reading comprehension, or didn't read through the rest of the thread. I conceded the fact that it didn't fit with Rule 2 hours ago. So your point is what, exactly?
/r/PussyPass02/04/15 01:56 AM
0

The owner brought the goddamn hammer here. Fair enough, and I'm not disputing that. Only that his reaction could have been much more drastic, and that I doubt a male would have been given the opportunity to pay, as opposed to immediate ejection or calling security/police. Speculation, to be fair, but I think the prevailing social sentiment with how to treat male v female offenders supports my theory. They are security for the malls. Unless you're vandalizing mall property, there's nothing they c…
/r/PussyPass01/04/15 03:44 PM
3

Mall cops have 0 authority whatsoever. What are you gonna do? Citizens arrest someone for taking a bite out of a single mini cookie? No. I disagree. A shopowner would be perfectly within their rights to have private security detain someone using reasonable force until the police arrive. Furthermore, almost every state has a section of code in regards to shoplifting allowing a merchant or their hired security to do the same, until police arrive. Individual stores may have a differing policy (Such…
/r/PussyPass01/04/15 03:20 PM
5

She didn't get off lighter than a man would have I'm not so sure. I'm pretty sure if it was a man swiping cookies from over the counter and scarfing them down, they wouldn't have even bothered asking him to pay for them, they'd just straight up call Security/Police. The moment you reach over the counter and contaminate the cookies with your bare hands without paying for them, that constitutes theft. I highly doubt a man would have been treated with as much patience and courtesy as this woman was…
/r/PussyPass01/04/15 02:54 PM
1

Not a "professional" per say, but I do quite a bit of chemical work as, shall we say, a hobby. When you go to either end of the pH scale (Corrosive/Caustic) you're dealing with substances that can, and will cause chemical burns. Bleach won't start burning immediately like lye will, but if you leave it on there long enough, it'll start causing problems. Incidentally, I can go down to Lowe's first thing in the morning and pick up some rather strong concentrations of both sulfuric acid (Hydrogen Su…
/r/PussyPass28/03/15 05:17 AM
1

"He dinndonuffin' wrong. He was gettin' he life back on track, goin' to church every week. He a good boy!" Yeah, that sounds about par for the course.
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 10:24 PM
2

While I can understand the bit about denying voting rights, that's a whole different argument. But what ultimately gets me, is this.: Should a troubled and emotionally unstable teen be thrust into a harsh prison environment, when research shows she will likely pick up worse criminal habits there? Chances are, if she's joined up with a gang and openly willing to beat a girl to death (We have no reason to assume she wouldn't, since she kept going after it was obvious the girl had lost consciousnes…
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 10:18 PM
2

Because psychiatric facilities are basically Old-Folk's Homes under permanent lockdown, whereas prison is an actual punishment, and feels like a punishment, as it should.
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 09:55 PM
2

Rules or no rules, if you receive economic benefits in exchange for sex, you are, by definition, a whore. How circumspect a path the benefits take to get to you, matters not. And having a steady partner to scratch your sexual itches is not the same as deciding to pursue her as an emotional companion. In fact, his choice was more responsible than hers, as it reduces the chance he could be exposed to STI's by remaining with one partner. She threw her agreement to the wind immediately. If you're lo…
/r/PussyPass22/03/15 07:50 PM
3

“I would die a feminist,” she writes of her collegiate activism, “but I was long overdue for some fun.” Later, she pictures women’s studies scholars judging her submission fantasies, and frets over “those Afghan women hidden under their burqas” who could be “beaten or even killed right now for doing what I was so casually doing.” Well, nice to see that, as a Feminist, she's more concerned with frivolity she wants than the oppression those Middle-eastern women are facing. So much for fighting for…
/r/PussyPass22/03/15 07:44 PM
62

“It’s very important not to judge people placed in situations where stress levels are so high they do irrational things to vulnerable children." “Women who are victims of domestic violence should seek help from relevant support agencies long before it reaches such a crisis point.” I never thought I'd say this, but the gargantuan amount of stupidity contained in those two simple sentences has got my jimmies so rustled, I'm tempted to say...that I'm "Triggered". How can one person be so damned ret…
/r/PussyPass21/03/15 05:07 PM
2

He threatened to potentially ruin her life forever. TIL that telling people you are having sex with someone ruins that person's life forever. Are you serious? If I knew the kids in my 7th Grade class were having sex (And many of them were quite vocal about it growing up), and I told somebody in our age group about it, the response would have been largely, "Okay...and? Everybody's doing it..." Serious question, here. Did you grow up amongst the Amish where having sex before marriage means you're …
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 02:28 AM
2

Just as Women aren't required to give men the sex they think we feel entitled to, we men aren't required to settle down and give women the commitment they feel they are entitled to, if we want sex. Women got rid of that obligation when they dismantled traditional gender roles. "Why should we buy the cow when the milk is free?" to put it in terms my Grandmother would use... It's the age of Gender Equality, women! Ditch those stuffy gender roles of the past and get with the times, already!
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:57 AM
9

While I mostly agree with you on the "Nice Guy" shtick (Painting all of /b/ with the same brush? I think that takes it a bit far, especially since I know several /b/ regulars who are pretty decent folk and regularly get laid. Anecdotal evidence, but take it as you will. IDGAF), I completely disagree on the feminism thing. SJW's/Feminism are practically one-and-the-same when it comes to modern feminism. SJW's are the ones pushing this socially retarded stuff like California's "Affirmative Consent…
/r/PussyPass18/01/15 08:23 AM
3

Legally? Whatever proportional force you are faced with that is necessary to stop the attack and/or remove yourself from the situation. Practically? Zero to nil. If anyone sees you defending yourself, in all likelihood, it will be seen as YOU attacking HER, you will be arrested, the Officer will call an ambulance to check her out, and you will have to make bail and prove your innocence against the state's assumption of guilt, with witnesses white-knighting and testifying against you. Fucked up, …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/15 10:31 AM
35

Doesn't sound like much of a pass to me. I disagree, especially when they start her off at the base-minimum for what the law allows them to sentence her with. (Indiana Law states the Sentence is anywhere from 6 Months to 6 years. At the least, the malice and intent-to-harm/frame an innocent person qualifies her for the latter half of severity.) She not only furthered the demand for materials that require victimization of children to produce, she intended to use this material as a way to harm an …
/r/PussyPass17/12/14 09:11 PM
116

Interesting tidbit, apparently there is a 5-year Mandatory Minimum for Possession/Production of CP, so women apparently get a Pussy Pass on Mandatory Minimums, now.
/r/PussyPass17/12/14 06:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter