TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CreepleCorn Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by CreepleCorn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

well women aren't people obviously. just cattle to reproduce with smh my head 🙄🙄
/r/MuslimRedPill03/05/20 12:35 AM
2

I completely agree with you. However, it is up to as now to look beyond what we’ve been raised to believe and see that we’re literally all just the same level of complex. Get rid of the feminine “halo-effect” and the masculine “reckless-effect” and approach each other as people. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 07:58 PM
2

Converting an overly simplified positive generalization of women to an overly simplified negative generalization of women is not leaving any room to actually see them as people. People can be shitty. People can be good. Seeing women as people allows for the expectation of either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 07:41 PM
1

for a dude who asks for infinite sources you sure like to ignore them completely.. .. and then also post all but (0) sources to back up your own claims lol. this’ll be the third time i’ll ask for your suggestions on the male mental health crisis. you have demanded my step-for-step plan of action, to which I clearly lay out and back up with multiple citations. your response? We’ve got tons. and feminists have actively fought against them. .. ok .. thanks? seems like y’all are doin a lot for yours…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 11:30 AM
1

Well my dude, I’ve only got questions for you. Where does society’s dislike of masculinity come into play? What purpose did your source serve otherwise? How is the phrase, “feminism is trying to shape masculinity without consideration for men” and “[...] feminism is redefining masculinity to their liking without letting men do so” any different? Why exactly do you think that feminists object to masculinity? Or, correctly put— certain aspects of masculinity? Sources for articles blaming mass shoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 02:56 AM
1

Sources: [1] Mental health/Feminism “[...] So when men should be empowered to reach out for help, they may be called a “pussy” or told to “toughen up.” Women attempt suicide more often, but men are four times more likely than women to die by suicide.” *Note: I don’t like Trudeau personally because he’s a hypocritical dink, but I’ve got more examples from the Canadian Liberal party just because it’s recent (mental health action is still young), it’s aligned with feminism (CLP gender statement), a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 02:02 AM
2

Note: Sources have been added to my initial comment. The sources for this reply can be found in the reply below. I'm on a lot of adderall right now so i guess it's essay time, ladies. sigh. And herein lies your problem. You seem to think that any criticism of modern day feminism lies in the inability to empathize with the day to day issues women have. Yeah, actually, that’s exactly it. Right on! Babe, I tell women this too; It’s for the bitter ones who use feminism as a mask for man-hating. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 02:01 AM
1

.. and feminism is trying to get rid of those standards. yes, that includes telling women off for projecting it onto men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 10:34 PM
1

Ok, so let me get this straight: You link evidence that society doesn’t like masculinity. You say feminism is trying to shape masculinity without consideration for men. If your conclusion wasn’t to blame feminism for their ideal view of masculinity, then I misunderstood and that’s on me. But then, who are you angry at for disagreeing with aspects of masculinity? Society or feminism? I’m a little lost. Also, you might have to expand on that last statement for argument’s sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 07:45 PM
1

That’s a really interesting study, thank you for linking. If we take that sample as a representative of society (meaning both men and women), why are you putting the blame on “masculinity-hate” on just women/feminism? Gasp. Is it because .. we live in a society? Matcho-men rise up 😤
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 07:31 PM
1

I’m gonna be real with you here chief, I’m getting so sick of using the word “feminism” and “toxic masculinity” because I feel like a living buzzfeed article. Really, by repeating all of these buzzwords I’m just feeding into the crazy libtard strawman that’s been created of me and feminism as a whole. I’d hope for my stance to still carry merit, but I’ve learned to recognize that one should let go of the debate as soon as the other side starts pulling out the “gender studies femsplaining” lol. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 07:23 PM
1

There’s a difference between “toxic masculinity” and “masculinity”. It’s why they’re two separate words. Masculinity is not a bad thing. This isn’t some feminist takeover that replaces all traces of masculinity with femininity. Encouraging men to drop the standard that they have to remain stoic despite their possible emotional turmoil is not erasing the valuable aspects of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:31 PM
1

lmao what EDIT: Oh shit, wrong thread. I was ready to throw hands. My b.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 04:55 PM
0

I understand full well what toxic masculinity is supposed to mean and how feminists mistakenly believe they can help men. I just flat out reject the concept along with most other feminist concepts. Okay, cool. I still don't necessarily understand why that makes feminism "cancer" since you can easily opt out that belief. (No, you would not be a misogynist for doing so. Choosing to pursue classic masculinity won't get you called sexist unless that masculinity involves ... sexism.) However, there i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:23 AM
5

feminism is in no way doing anything that would remotely benefit most men. Ok. First, let's explain toxic masculinity. Essentially, it is believed by many feminists that eradicating these harmful expectations of masculinity (Remaining stoic, repressing feelings, etc.) can encourage men to seek out help with emotional issues before things get messy. Obviously, this will not be a one-all fix to the suicide issue, but we can hope that it will [help](https://www.cbc.ca/life/wellness/toxic-masculinit…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 05:25 AM
2

because you are waman. not person. no talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 02:36 AM
3

Oof. Yuck. Can I ask what you define as a "mind-game"? Just for clarity's sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 02:11 AM
9

Please note: Men are incarcerated because men commit more crimes. This violence, and the depression that leads to suicide, are symptoms of male social conditioning that feminists have been fighting against for decades. Feminism is attacking this social conditioning. Not men themselves. Also I'm not sure how feminism is rotting this country inside out. Explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 02:01 AM
7

If your standards/wants are reasonable, you’ll find one. Not many (LTR material) people are fond of mind-games beyond high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 01:54 AM
1

... You know they can always walk away, right? This doesn’t go for those few cases where yeah, the woman really is being shitty and continues to lead him even when she’s well aware of his feelings, but (at least from what I’ve seen) women will openly state that they have no interest in anything beyond friendship right off the bat. Conclusion: Shitty women exist. They might never put their foot down to a friend they know has feelings for them. However, most of us aren’t shitty and if we pick up o…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 08:52 PM
1

Ah yes, because you can't reject blatant sexism without having an ulterior motive that concurs with the structures of sexism itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 12:58 AM
3

A committed boyfriend without having to put out. My male friends do not act like my boyfriend. Just like how my female friends don't take me out for romantic anniversary date nights. It's platonic. I think you're arguing under the impression that I've got this circle of "lovers" who act as second or third boyfriends for the times that the first one doesn't quite cut it. But I think it should be made clear that a lot of my guy friends have girlfriends/wives of their own, and the consequences dish…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:53 PM
1

Aw geez. I failed to consider that some redpill internet stranger knows me better than I know myself. I should have known my place, my bad. 😔 I’m curious as to why you’re so quick to reject that different people are attracted to different things. In a world of such vast diversity of preference, is it really so hard to accept that someone can’t find physical traits sexually attractive on their own? EDIT: because grammar hard :(
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 10:57 PM
1

Nah. Never been too keen on assuming I know what other people think. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:52 PM
1

Huh. Alrighty then. hmu with reasons when you figure them out b 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:28 PM
2

You might have to elaborate here just a tad, chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:22 PM
3

and you don’t think this goes for some men too?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:19 PM
3

Oh? I’m not really sure where you got that idea from. I specifically altered myself/the way I behaved to attract people who would respect me for such. Never have I ever felt automatically entitled to someone’s attraction. We all gotta work on ourselves, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:01 PM
4

Nah babe. It’s pretty rare to find an actual (real life) feminist who agrees with the strawman ideals you see here on the internet. I can’t say I speak for all feminists, but I’m pretty sure we’re not as crazed and irrational as you might think. no. we don’t want want all female CEOs for the sake of feminism. we want women who are qualified to have equal opportunity as qualified men. no. we don’t want chicks to join up in STEM for the sake of feminism. we want women who are qualified/interested …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:58 PM
9

Being attractive isn’t really one of our main goals in life, my dude. Personally I’ve come to recognize that people who find basic self-respect appalling are people who benefit from its lacking. yyuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:45 PM
3

You are absolutely right in that first half. Using people in relationships is not a trait exclusive to a single gender. It’s not “men are shitty” or “women are shitty” it’s just .. “people are shitty.” I’ve been used as a pair of holes for sex or as an interactive soundboard for lonely, lonely manchildren and I admit, as someone who just wanted to love and be loved for the substance of the mind, that bullshit really skewed my perception of men as a whole. But then you gotta take into account tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 05:40 PM
1

ugh. yup. A hateful xx-oriented subreddit is just another hateful subreddit. I wouldn’t expect anything less than that sort of behaviour and (luckily) the common disdain for it. The nasty picture painted by the stupidly loud minority of women is one that’ll be used to fuel a million arguments against the majority. It’s really up to the real and sane of us (the 99.9%!) to prove that we don’t spew that kinda shit and that really, these chicks are super embarrassing and detrimental to our fight to …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 05:21 PM
1

Well to be honest, the whole Alpha-Beta-Soup is still pretty intriguing to me solely because it’s just so foreign to my worldview. I do appreciate the information though, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:57 PM
1

Nope. Never chased an Alpha. Also wasn’t really aiming for comfort/stability when I started pursuing. I had a big ol’ crush on him and I wanted him in my life because he was someone I liked to be around (and yes, eventually wanted to bang). Most people aren’t directly looking for the resources of comfort/stability/company when they enter a relationship (There will always be exceptions but usually you want to avoid the people who are only there for those things). I just liked him. I liked talking…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:39 PM
3

I guess that’s something you could also ask my girlfriends. Or maybe dating and attraction is a little more flexible than the 2-4 categories its being caged into. Who knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:33 PM
3

I’m thinking more along the lines of an apartment with 6 or more jars of formaldehyde-preserved male genitalia. ... 😱 Nah. I honestly don’t think they’re ever going to have the numbers/rage-boners to get that bad. Not even to the point of growing into 2040’s crazy cat lady’s. I think it takes a rare and certain type of person to stick with such a hateful ideology for so long. For every crazy and legitimate man-hater on that sub there are probably ten women just like me that got out as soon as th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:31 PM
2

I am indeed looking for a friend! But a friend who I’m also sexually attracted to (That comment was poorly phrased; I do still like to smash, but really only with someone I have a deep, emotional connection with. I know, laame.). So, by this notion, am I beta-chaser? 😨
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:22 PM
20

Totally. However I don’t think a lot of their advice is terrible as much as their ideology is ... gross. Again, it’s how they duped me in the first place. Scrolling through this super cozy all-women club after being burned by a few dudes in my life feels super nice and validating until.. “oUhH ok that’s a little mean but yeahhhh! self worth!! woooo!” and then “wait hol’ up that’s blatant misandry.” It’s a foil to r/incels, truly. The offer of this nice, cushy room furnished with the warmth of ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:12 PM
1

Because sometimes we know we have guy friends that wanna fuck us but we trust that they’re good enough people to keep their pants on and respect the friendship/us as human beings. If they can’t respect that or if they refuse to be friends after we tell them no (which always sucks because you feel totally used), it’s not our problem and the latter makes them really unattractive as ‘friends’ anyway. I thought we were talking about the reasons women keep their “friendzoned orbiters” around, not den…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:57 PM
1

So, question: As a woman who doesn’t really put too much weight on physical attraction/sex in a LT romantic relationship, would I just be better off going for “betas/omegas” anyway? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:48 PM
1

Thank you for clearing things up! I’ve never really gone too deep into this kinda stuff so it’s kinda neat to get an idea from the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:43 PM
6

feminism is kinda the rejection of the “supposed to”. it’s about celebrating our differences and making sure everyone has a choice in what they wanna do. high-libido feminist? embrace how you love sex “like men”. go and have fun and don’t let yourself be shamed for it. low-libido feminist? it’s ok! you don’t have to worry about that either. it’s all about the choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:33 PM
3

Agreed. I can’t even find myself sexually attracted to good lookin’ dudes (though yes, I can comprehend/appreciate what looks good) unless I’m into them personally first. Then all of a sudden EVERYTHING about them physically becomes super duper attractive. Casual sex is not my cup of tea. I need to value the big ol’ brain attached to the body and have mine valued all the same. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Some see casual sex as icky because they feel used and hollowed while so…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:29 PM
3

New to the lingo. SMV?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:17 PM
4

God, I love the Holy Grail. I wonder how us women would respond to the Three Questions of the Bridge of Death. “What ... is your name?” “What ... is your favourite colour?” “What ... is the reason behind denying the belief that any real interest in platonic relationships with the opposite sex is a farce constructed by women the sake of leeching their male resources?” Could it be that we have genuine interest in spending meaningful and non-romantic/sexual time with human beings we like, and don’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:14 PM
48

Yes! I was lured in by the prospect of keeping headstrong and loving yourself only to immediately stumble upon a platinum post about “why men should always pay for dates”. ugh. way to stoop alllll the way down to the same level as the people they made fun of. blatant misandry. gross. thanks for giving the mysoginists more clay to work with, ladies. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 03:01 PM
2

you’ll push for something more when you’re sure that you are a.) connected and compatible. b.) romantically/sexually attracted to them. you do all of the connecting bs first and foremost to be sure you’ve got both components and you’re ready to rumble. you cannot build (or even really want) a relationship in the first place while lacking one or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:51 PM
4

She gets all the benefits with none of the responsibility. Responsibility to what? I always thought that my friendship was enough for my friends, since it was always enough for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:40 PM
2

Out of curiosity, you’re obviously getting some sort of top-secret information about the true intent of women. Their reflexive denial of the truth about their superficiality proves them guilty! Kind sir, where might I find this vital information? Gotta tell them liars off once and for all!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:37 PM
0

Mmm. The friendzone is a thing, however... it’d truly be an item of make-believe if not for the place that a lot of men put their female friends into first— the date/fuckzone. I’m not saying it’s possible to just “turn off your attraction” for your female friends, because that’s not really an option. I’m saying, see us as human beings and value us as such and maybe, maybe, maybe y’all won’t be so bitter about just wanting some friends. When you make a male friend, you don’t stick around because …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:30 PM
1

I think you’re simplifying personal attraction a bit here, my guy. Women, like men, often connect to people without feeling attracted to them. (Cough, friendships.) Just because women are typically more “personality-driven” (emphasis on typically) doesn’t mean that they’re immediately attracted to the first display of personal connection. Just as a theoretical person who is far more “sexually-driven” won’t be immediately attracted to ANY kinda-ok-lookin-maybe-would-bang person, people who are ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 02:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter