Creighton_Beryll Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Wikipedia article on male circumcision has at some point been edited to be pro-circumcision biased. Yeah? Watch me.	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 07:54 PM
-2	Wikipedia article on male circumcision has at some point been edited to be pro-circumcision biased. I'm sure that's true, as far as it goes. But what does it have to do with what I said? My point was that I've never seen any need to get upset about my being cut. By the way, there's no need to place that word in quotes. It's a real word: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/druthers	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 07:34 PM
0	Wikipedia article on male circumcision has at some point been edited to be pro-circumcision biased. Of course you count. I simply happen to disagree with you, is all.	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 07:22 PM
-11	Wikipedia article on male circumcision has at some point been edited to be pro-circumcision biased. Well, has it alternately been seen to be anti-circumcision biased? I'm no partisan in this debate. If I had my druthers, I'd be uncircumcised. But I am circumcised, and I have to say that Mr. Happy works just fine. No dissatisfaction here. :-)	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 03:56 AM
1	NPR: "Trigger Warnings" on Free Speech in Universities. Jonah Goldberg: "The Peculiar Madness Of Trigger Warnings" http://preview.tinyurl.com/pu6rrc3	/r/MensRights	21/05/14 06:38 PM