TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Crioca Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by Crioca on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Looks like someone needs to visit /r/meow_irl right meow.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 02:28 AM
20

Great post, I felt she really drove her point home. Things have looked a little different to me though; my impression of the sequence of events is that the Skepchicks are a following the 'high school clique' formula, whereby a small minority of individuals use selective bullying to intimidate the rest of the group into going along with their behaviour.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:17 AM
1

Not you, the guy that removed his comment posted a reply to your comment of an image of a seal calling "GAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY!!!!"
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:33 PM
3

Bite me. I don't want you fuckers making gay men feel like they're not an equal part of Men's Rights. Not only are you making fun of a core Men's Rights issue, but you're doing so by saying that men's sexuality is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:46 AM
1

/r/TheseParticularWomenBehavingBadlyAndNotBeingProsecutedToTheExtentAManWouldBe ?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:35 AM
2

Nothing wrong with being gay, gtfo.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:55 AM
8

Still doesn't explain why they are intertwined with atheism specifically though. It's not, but atheism is one of the largest and more active social movements of our time so it's the more striking example of the process, but Marxist Feminism is the Ur example. Now Geek culture actually does have this, it's called geek feminism. Hacker culture is a geek subculture, it's harder to split because it's 1. smaller and 2. Females overwhelmingly disparaging of hacker culture. Football, Math aren't really…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:43 AM
1

Men, on the other hand do not usually look down upon other men for having sex with a lot of different women. [citation needed] because in my (anecdotal) experience that's extremely common. And in the cases when a man gets "slut-shamed" from other men or women it's because of the type of women he has sex with, not the quantity. If a guy sleeps with a bunch of "hot" women, nobody will disparage him for it. Not it isn't and yeah they will. Not only have I experienced this first hand, I see it regul…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:08 AM
13

There's a number of different reasons why atheism and radical feminism have become regrettably intertwined, but it's hardly unprecedented. Basically it goes down like this: A bunch of individuals (typically males) form ideas and publish materials around a socially significant concept. These individuals attract other individuals (typically males) to form a movement around this socially significant concept. This movement beings to build momentum and starts affecting social change. Feminist groups …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:13 AM
1

Simply put: There is no feasible circumstance where you can impregnate a woman you've associated with by any means and not be liable for child support.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 01:36 AM
-1

Yes. http://i.imgur.com/8xiPQ.jpg
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:21 AM
-2

That's a gross and inaccurate over generalization.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 11:54 PM
8

Two words: Artificial womb.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:20 PM
10

Oh the irony of the term "Mansplaining", a gendered term coined (I can only assume by people who are blithely unaware of the term "hypocrisy") for the purposes of explaining to one sex, why their penises render them unable to express a valid opinion on a given subject. It's a term that demands special privilege for one gender and demonises the other in the name of gender equality. Chaufemism at it's most transparent.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:32 AM
2

I often wonder how someone can generalize a group they belong to but not identify with the generalization. Egotism.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:51 AM
2

In fact, because it's a matter of opinion, logically You haven't demonstrated any logic supporting your statement, let alone proved that said logic is valid. It really irks me when people use the term logic without understanding what it means. And secondly no, it's not a matter of opinion: Legally, medically, developmentally, a foetus is not considered equivalent to a child for a specific range of reasons.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:15 AM
12

A foetus however, is not equivalent to a child. You could make the argument that this stops being true beyond a certain point (i.e 20 weeks which is what constitutes a "late term" abortion) but those comprise less than 1% of medical abortions.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:29 AM
1

The patriarchy at work right?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 11:08 PM
2

Dan Savage is amazing; for someone to be able to put controversial opinions into the public arena and be right on the money so often is evidence of incredible talent.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:25 PM
3

biased* edit: unless you're stating that you have two asses, in which case carry on my donkey endowed friend.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:42 PM
1

I didn't downvote you but your comment did seem like a bit of a sneer. I haven't found it to be a problem honestly, but I'm not American so it might be because Australia isn't as politically polarized.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:26 AM
-7

So did the people who created SRS...
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:42 PM
3

Another good word for vocabulary is lexicon. ;)
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:32 AM
4

So it's ok to take away kids of 500,000 catholic dads because the clergy has molested many kids? That's not an equivalent scenario on a number of different levels. And my point is that this is happening prior to any proper process and it legally has nothing to do with anyone's opinion of his religion. I agree. I didn't say that what happened to him was right, I said he's not the example to use because there are legitimate concerns about the welfare of the child because of his relationship and st…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:57 AM
56

Yeah, I'm an individual that's concerned about the welfare of men in our society but I'm also a far left progressive. The left has virtually always been the one to carry the momentum for civil rights changes and aligning the movement with the right wing will effectively mean that MR will never gain that momentum. Aligning it with the left is counter productive also as the many of the movers and shakers in the far left are advocating for changes that discriminate against and disadvantage the majo…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:51 AM
8

The concept is fucked up, but Tom Cruise is not the example used to illustrate that. He's a well known participant a dangerous faith based organization that practices social isolation/shunning, malicious litigation and has a bad track record when it comes to high profile members leaving the fold. His influence and association with that organization makes him a liability to that child.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:38 AM
56

It's been tried, they refused. The subreddit is a known false flag effort anyway. SRS founders created and it's initial content it so as to attract human drivel and create a cultured microcosm of intense misogyny to use as pseudoproof of rape culture in society at large.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:33 AM
0

by six weeks their hearts are already beating. True, though it looks like this
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:48 AM
5

It's a penis with a partially healed wound in it. It's NSFW but it's not NSFL
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:56 PM
4

In econ most of the profs are NOT liberal as it would be impossible to teach the courses following that flawed system of logic Liberalism isn't a system of logic.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:01 AM
1

I think it wouldn't be ill-advised to contact people at Stanford about this, I think it would be if you're a man, they could just accuse you of being abusive and you'd have no recourse.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:35 AM
11

As I understand it, in this context it's being told that you should be ashamed, because as a man you'll be an inferior parent and you're essentially a burden on your child's life.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:22 AM
0

They're both human shitbags. -fin.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 11:08 PM
1

I do; It's not ideal, but as I said it's an adverse consequence that's innate to a larger positive trend.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:59 PM
3

Children imitate, it's what they do. When people openly asserting their sexuality became more visible in the public eye, it followed that some children would be more likely to imitate that behaviour. It's a side effect of a socially harmonious trend; society becoming more accepting of sexuality and sexual behaviour that diverges from established preconceptions of acceptable behaviour~. For the time being we're still firmly holding onto the concept of childhood innocence, but that's a concept tha…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:51 AM
2

I'm not so sure about that. Just at the beginning of America's history not long ago, girls were getting married around 15. True, but that's not evidence that children were reaching puberty at a younger age. Girls were married around 15 because that's when they were deemed sexually mature (i.e capable of breeding). So it's possible that it's actually evidence of the reverse, but that could just be coincidence. The ages of starting and finishing puberty has been steadily becoming younger, but that…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:10 AM
1

Brownian Motion seems to throw a serious spanner in the works. For that matter so does pretty much the entire field of quantum mechanics.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:19 AM
6

so tag it.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:39 AM
6

That said, other philosophical positions are just as non-sensical. A lot of them, but good philosophy should adhere to logic and be grounded in axiomatic proofs. Post-modernism was great for sweeping away a lot of the accumulated philosophical kludge of the last couple of thousand years, but sadly has inspired generations of philosophical wankery the likes of which the world has never seen. The comic to me was satirizing the attitudes held by people who still cling to post-modernism without havi…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:30 PM
11

Totally wrong definition of post-modernism. Like, not even close. Would you like to give us the totally right definition of post-modernism then? Because if you knew shit about shit then you'd know that the definition of post modernism is something that's massively debated and varies wildly. And you'd also probably realize that the subject of this comic isn't post-modernism or cis-privilege but the attitudes of people who (ironically) use post-modernism and pop-psychology as a justification for a…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:13 PM
55

It's an interesting claim, they'd need to do a much wider sample and have the results confirmed by an independent 3rd party before it's it amounts to anything substantial though. I'll give it 12 hours until some loathsome SRSer coins the term "Vagina blaming" and they declare that science and research are just "two more tools of the patriarchy"
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:54 AM
3

There are plenty of men, gay and straight, that align themselves with extreme feminism. So why should gay men be any more suspect than straight men? I can't recall any examples of the Gay Rights Movement pushing anti male or anti hetero legislation and as far as I can tell the concerns voiced in this video are without rational basis. Gay and lesbian MRAs are our brothers and sisters respectively and are wholly undeserving of this kind of baseless suspicion.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:25 AM
2

Although it mainly affects men, I wouldn't say this is sexist. I'll ask you; if the majority, or even an equal number of homeless people in the US were women, do you think that this attitude of starving the homeless would be permissible? Or do you think they'd likely be a huge outcry and a demand of chance in policy? Whatever rationales are behind the change, the reason they can get away with setting such inhumane policies is that society considers males, especially poor males, disposable. That'…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:06 AM
9

The treatment of males belonging to ethnic minorities is particularly heinous; racism is compounded by misandry.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 10:55 AM
7

It's in print so technically he's right. He 'libelled' us.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 10:24 AM
5

who he said appeared to be acting irrationally -- was about to drive off with the girls. So if acting irrationally and taking kids with you is something you can shoot people for, why aren't cops gunning down people for trying to take their kids to church / mosque / temple etc? He was killed for two reasons: He was male. He was black.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:54 PM
6

The bill is parody, this politician doesn't care about men accessing Vigara, it's protesting the attempts by religious right wingers to control women's access to birth control and abortion services.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:47 AM
0

Umm, where did I say that?
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:39 AM
-5

It keeps women away from men, men away from women. Whatever women lose in their lack of male contact is also lost by males in their lack of female contact. I agree, but my point is that that's not an equal trade right? In this case the women being isolated leads to their inability to effectively network socially for professional purposes within the organization. No such impact exists for the men in this case, because all of the professional networking is conducted within now exclusively male cir…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:31 AM
-1

Protecting our family home and livelihood trumps someone else needing to feel included in the office. From your perspective yes, but that doesn't mean that the management of the business should be able to enact policies to that effect, officially or otherwise. Maybe they'll pass legislation that women have to be invited to lunch and included in all e-mail jokes and office banter, 'til then I find this the most foolproof way to avoid giving a female the ability to have you fired at will. I think …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:46 AM
-6

Discriminatory against whom? Both of course, but all discrimination is not equal. In this case the women are being socially isolated within the business and that's putting them at a large disadvantage professionally. The negative effects of discrimination that the men are facing here are less severe and offset by lessened competition for career advancement. Keep in mind that it's not the management that made false accusations of sexual harassment, so we can't say that they're discriminating agai…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:18 AM
-4

It's risk reduction. True, but that doesn't make it any less discriminatory. If male employees want to avoid co-workers for any particular reason, that's their prerogative, but it's highly discriminatory and plainly unfair for management to propose such a policy.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:49 AM
-4

That's some pretty heavy discrimination right there and it sounds like a really hostile working environment. Management should not be encouraging male employees to isolate female employees. Blaming all women for the actions of a few false accusers makes no more sense than blaming all men for the actions of a few rapists. A better solution would be to make sure you've always got male company as it's just not safe for any man to be alone with a woman. Having at least two other males present would …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:18 AM
3

Poe's Law; on the internet without some kind of smiley or other indicator it's impossible to tell if a person is actually that much of a moron, or just trolling.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:43 PM
0

All that article is doing is taking a few words that are regularly associated with Marxism and then associating them with that article. It's textbook association fallacy
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:48 PM
0

That's not what Marxism is. Marxism is a world view that combines Marxist economic theory with Marxist sociological theory (of which Class Struggle is just a subset) and a materialist view of history.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:34 PM
1

"cultural Marxist" wut? That has nothing to do with Marxism...
/r/MensRights24/01/12 05:30 AM
3

Fake
/r/MensRights18/01/12 05:50 AM
15

That's what it should mean, but most of the time it's used to say "Shut up, white boy."
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:36 AM
11

I think if they're being paid to do the same job, they should do the same job. We need to stop shielding women from their own choices, you wanted to be a cop, you're a cop. No special treatment. Now go arrest that 6'4 methhead biker.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 10:57 AM
-1

Urgh, yeah these new Ken dolls are disgusting, how dare male dolls not confirm to traditional gender roles? Someone should get the Mutaween onto Mattel before boys start getting the idea it's okay to express themselves through their appearance. No one wants to date a sissy amirite?
/r/MensRights05/01/12 11:52 PM
5

Donors will remain anonymous, for the duration of the child's dependent status. That's not anonymous. If you are anonymous in doing something, then no one knows it was you who did it. If you have to provide identification to do something then you are by definition not doing it anonymously. Again, the law is hurting no one I don't think that's true; there's a demand that's outstripping supply, couples and individuals seeking IVF are having to turn to second rate alternatives. This would come unde…
/r/MensRights01/01/12 03:18 AM
6

I don't see anything wrong with that. At the end of the day I don't think it's about right or wrong. Donors want to be anonymous and if they can't be anonymous they won't donate. So who is this law really hurting?
/r/MensRights01/01/12 02:44 AM
11

Seriously? I did not know that. Perhaps I am wrong. But I think that's bullshit, by the way. MR issues affect minorities even more because discrimination is cumulative, which is one of the reasons I'm happy to chill out here. It does happen fairly regularly. There's a pretty effective smear out there that Men's Rights = White Men's Rights, which is really unfortunate. It's a triple whammy too, as not only does it discourage non-white males from participating, but it also draws the fringe who wan…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:57 AM
3

People are desensitized when it comes to bigotry against males. People are sensitive to bigotry when it comes to black people. Swapping the male demographic with the black demographic is a way of overcoming and illustrating the socially conditioned insensitivity that exists regarding bigoted behaviour towards men.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:31 AM
2

Where was the implication? the men's rights movement is a movement for white males? Take a wild guess.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:26 AM
2

Of course they could, but why would they? They could grow up to be Satanists, they could grow up to be S&M loving Juggalos, they could grow up to hate you anyway, they could grow up to be or do anything. It's equally rational to assume any of these things as to assume hatred for the father. Which is to say, not rational at all.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 04:55 AM
2

Why should a child whose father surrendered his parental responsibilities resent the father? A happy childhood isn't predicated on the presence of the provider of DNA or the money that that DNA provider has. If the child is unhappy it will be the parent who bears the brunt of the animosity, and rightly so. For they are the ones who have failed to provide a happy environment to rear the child in.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 04:36 AM
-1

LoL introduces new heroes into it's roster fairly frequently.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:37 PM
0

Yeah, LoL is parodying Dragon Age. They do this with a lot of games.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:20 PM
22

Pretty sure the OP was a joke, both Morrigan and Alistar are characters from Dragon Age. Still, it is good news to see there's finally an effort being made to reach out t at-risk men.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:11 AM
2

That's not irony.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:23 PM
1

Talk to your divorce lawyer. They will have better answers for you than anyone.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:39 PM
3

Well they tried to make it that way, and failed. In any case, the behaviour is endemic of feminists; they can dish it out, but they expect not to have to take it.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:24 AM
16

Meanwhile, the vast majority of serious OH&S injuries and deaths happen to men. Men don't get to choose between work and safety, we don't have the luxury.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 05:19 AM
9

Nothing feminizing about fucking a bloke.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 12:47 AM
1

Except... wasn't this exactly what the metrosexual trend was about? Men who decided to embrace typically feminine methods of enhancing their appearance? And didn't it suffer a swift fall in popularity after a backlash by women and feminists in general? Perhaps if feminists want to eliminate patriarchy, they should be focusing on educating women about how sexual selection in favour of traditional, patriarchal male attributes, is going to completely retard any movement by heterosexual men towards …
/r/MensRights11/04/11 06:06 PM
2

Make sure you've got all your ducks in a row legal wise, and then when it's your turn for custody, rock up and politely tell them that you're taking your child for your allowed time. If they refuse, then you call the cops. Also, check what your states wiretapping laws are and see if you can legally record a conversation with one party consent.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 05:10 AM
2

If we can't tell a woman what to do with her body (in regards to abortion), how can they tell us what to do with our money? Because in all fairness, those two things aren't equivalent. It's why the IRS can simply take your money, your car, etc, for taxes owed, but can't take your organs for their equivalent aftermarket worth. I don't want, nor claim any rights to woman's bodies. What I would like is a say in what happens to the embryo that happens to reside in her uterus. I'm as pro choice as it…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:06 PM
1

Eh, Walmart is an anus like vortex of shitty business ethics and human waste, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if this particular complaint was on the up and up.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 10:10 PM
2

What feminism should be. Sorry but no, we don't get to define what feminism should be any more than they get to define what men's rights should be.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 10:41 PM
2

The sword, in the case of selection bias, cuts both directions... go figure. So... there is no patriarchy then. I mean this is what you're saying: That groups of people will tend to pick other people with similar views / genders, regardless if they're male or female dominated. This means which ever group has more authority at any given time, they an 'archy'
/r/MensRights28/03/11 02:51 AM
2

Yes Yes but the discrimination receives a disproportionate amount of attention. I support equal rights for everyone. Most stay true, but a vocal minority use feminism as a platform for an inequality agenda. I don't think it's feminism's responsibility to watch out for our rights. That's our responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 02:43 AM
2

Why even bother to refute? This person doesn't even have an audience. It's just a lonely 'womyn' crying out for attention. Pass.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:23 PM
12

I am both offended if a guy DOES pay for my coffee, and if he DOESN’T. Sorry, that is just insane. If she can recognise her cognitive dissonance, she's a far cry above the majority of feminists.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:48 PM
2

This. Almost everywhere, debt is considered an "asset".
/r/MensRights21/03/11 03:43 AM
15

That was actually a really good article. Written by a feminist whose mature enough and wise enough to recognise misandrist bullshit for what it is.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 03:43 PM
2

MFW technology for an artificial womb becomes available and feminists go into fits because women no longer have complete control over reproduction.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:05 AM
2

Spot on. But it doesn't necessarily need to be a parent to be a strong male role model, it just needs to be someone who takes an interest and cares enough to be involved. Have you thought about becoming a Big Brother?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:03 AM
2

Not a true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:00 AM
1

No thanks necessary, the pleasure was all mine.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:57 AM
2

Hey, remember the last conversation we had on this? The one where I demonstrated that the mainstream psychological and child welfare organizations were willing to put forward an amicus curiae brief to the supreme court of Cali that there's no research to suggest that the gender of the parents had any statistically significant on the welfare of the child? Yes I do think that masculine role models are critical to a child, but you're full of shit on this "fatherlessness is child abuse" crap. The ev…
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:35 AM
0

How about you participate and raise then level of discussion rather than telling us that you are dissapoint.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 07:08 PM
18

Male Privilege: The privledge to have everyone automatically assume the worst about you at any given opportunity. And continue beliving the worst despite all evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:04 PM
3

Yes, but nobody cares about that.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 01:25 AM
10

What was she doing with a shrimp fork? She stole it, clearly! From a buffet! I fucking lost it. :D
/r/MensRights04/03/11 07:13 PM
0

Uh, yes? In fact there's a pretty well documented tradition of it.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 04:14 AM
6

As much as I enjoyed seeing a woman get dealt exactly what she gave out, (And then cry about it. Bawww! Equality is unfair!) this sort of thing isn't appropriate for men's rights. When the enjoyment in watching this video comes from the fact that the person being struck back is a woman (regardless of how fair the reaction was), that's misogynistic behaviour on our part.
/r/MensRights26/02/11 11:35 PM
4

Yes, yes it is. The thing that upsets me is not feminism, but the double standards inherent with attitudes towards feminism.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 02:42 AM
1

Video has been DCMA'd, mirror or someone fill us in?
/r/MensRights17/02/11 02:55 AM
3

Eh, it's fine by me, if a chick wants to be a dude, then welcome to the brotherhood.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 02:53 AM
1

Wow, it's like some kind of Islamic honour killing, but Republican.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 10:26 PM
6

Shut the fuck up cunt. Your eloquent and rational argument has swayed me. Seriously "Shut the fuck up cunt." ? What's that supposed to accomplish? Why even bother posting?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 04:49 PM
6

He is right in a fucked up sort of way. It doesn't matter, the context and theme of his writings completely overshadows any actual value in what he says. This guy is no more than the male equivalent of the shrill radical feminist; he takes some basic, accurate points and blows them up and tries to use them to support his rhetoric. It's bullshit. This guy is obsessed with women, it's all he talks about, all he thinks about, all his self esteem, all his accomplishments, all his ego is wrapped up i…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:53 PM
16

He makes some good points. No he doesn't, he echoes some of the basic points of the men's rights movements and then buries them under chauvinist bullshit. He's a goddam extremist, the male equivalent of those shrill idiot radical feminists. Men's Rights already has an image issue, we don't need assholes like this going around and fulfilling every negative stereotype of men that people hold.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:35 PM
2

I'm divided on this... it clearly sets an awful precedent, but at the same time... What if this man can't understand things like STI's? Does the understand that sex can have serious consequences? How can you consent if you're mentally unable to understand the consequences of your actions? This isn't punishment, no one's saying that he's done anything wrong, it's a case of the state looking after someone whose been deemed not fit to be able to take care of themselves. I suppose that I don't agree…
/r/MensRights06/02/11 02:35 AM
1

If I was making plenty of money and working from home, sure, I'd probably have two or three. If I was working 9 hour days at on office and getting home at 8pm, probably not.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 09:28 PM
1

Would this be Miss Ann Thrope? Missanthrope? "Misanthropy is generalized dislike, distrust, disgust, contempt or hatred of the human species, human nature, or society. A misanthrope is someone who holds such views or feelings." Bad troll site is bad.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 10:00 PM
43

I wonder how far this would stretch... I mean there's thousands* of sperm in a single ejaculation no? I assume if she'd split the sperm with a friend he'd be responsible for that child's welfare as well? What about if she shared it with four women? Eight? Sixteen? At what point do women start becoming responsible for the consequences of their actions? *Edit: After Philosarapter's comment I looked it up: "The World Health Organisation provides a definition of a 'normal' sperm count: the concentra…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:27 PM
13

How about a "Thanks blokes for putting the effort in to make Wikipedia what it is."? I guess that's too much to ask, because when a platform that comes out where a person's gender isn't even apparent unless they make an effort to make it so, and there's no discrimination as to access and contributions, if women aren't going out of their way and putting in their free time to contribute as much as men, then obviously the problem is with men.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:26 AM
4

Be kind, everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle. - Plato
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:56 PM
3

When it comes to abortion I'm very pro choice. I think the woman AND the man should get to choose.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:12 PM
3

I can't even imagine what the feminist response would be if the genders in this piece were reversed =X Oh yeah I can, they'd be screaming bloody murder about the objectification of women and about a thousand other things.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 02:30 AM
43

I guess this stuff is sexist, but that's from one point of view. I do just about all of this on a date and it's not because I'm some subserviant fuck, it's because when you do it right, with the right confidence, you come off like a fucking boss. This is all conditional on the type of person you are and the type of person you're dating of course, but it applies to enough girls to be relevant. So I don't know how this is going to go over here, but as a man in his mid 20's here's my take on this l…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 05:28 PM
-2

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 12:27 AM
2

That was an amazing video to watch, especially as an Australian who grew up in a rural area. The suicide rate amongst Australian men in rural areas is one of the highest in the world. They do it so tough, they put everything of themselves into the land and into their families and this is how they're rewarded. As a man you have to work from dawn till dusk to provide for your family and the way the courts look at it, if you've succeeded as a provider you've failed as a father. If you've succeeded …
/r/MensRights01/01/11 05:21 PM
6

Parenting can be tough and doesn't come to everyone naturally. What might seem obvious to you could be utterly perplexing to others. Have some fucking compassion and don't be a judgemental prick.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 04:56 PM
3

It's not really paranoia so long as you remain practical and in control of your concerns. Take the boy to a paediatrist and tell him or her calmly of your concerns, but before you do that sit down and figure out just what those concerns are and why they are so. While you're there ask about nutrition for your child. Processed cheese and doritos are both incredibly high in salt / sodium. You REALLY need to control his diet. One of the best things you can do for your child is to instil good eating …
/r/MensRights01/01/11 04:51 PM
3

Fantastic article. It's programs like these that will change public perception on what is means to be a male and a father.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 03:05 PM
0

It also makes for some fun role playing / fetishes.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 09:59 PM
3

upvote for you.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:31 AM
6

No, because you didn't sign in yourself. She signed in and then gave the device to you: she authenticated and then passed that authentication on to you. Now where do we go from there? It gets a bit murky from a legal POV, IANAL but I work in info/sec so I am exposed to this on a daily basis: Depending on the laws in your country you MAY be guilty of a crime if you further access the account, but probably not unless there's something that instructs you against doing that visible. However, if you …
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:24 AM
3

Blargh, I'm torn on this one. As an information security professional, what he did is illegal and SHOULD be illegal. But what he's being charged with goes way beyond the scope of what that law was intended. However I expect my email to be private and I keep it private. I would no more want my SO reading my email than my paper mail. As a men's rights advocate I look at this and say "That sucks and is unfair, I bet if the genders were reversed people would be applauding this woman." But as a priva…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:10 AM
1

She's clearly having a mid-life crisis. Is this not blindingly obvious from the first page?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:22 AM
3

Lads I think we're all reading too much into this. They're ninjas 'ferchrisake, standard gender symbolism does not apply.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 09:43 PM
7

Don't generalize and let go the victim complex. While there is a definite trend that makes it easy to screw males in family courts, I'm sure women see their share of injustice as well. The problem is not men, the problem is not women. The problems are the system and ANY individual that abuses it; male or female.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 01:32 AM
3

"(a)The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section: (1)"Domestic violence" means the infliction or threat of physical harm against past or present adult or adolescent female intimate partners, and shall include physical, sexual, and psychological abuse against the woman, and is a part of a pattern of assaultive, coercive, and controlling behaviors directed at achieving compliance from or control over, that woman." Wow, that's fucking insane.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter