TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CrisisEraDynamo Archive

View 16 posts and 43 comments by CrisisEraDynamo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

MetaCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 05:55 PM
28

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 04:39 PM
14

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 11:36 AM
7

Men's RightsCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 04:15 PM
7

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 06:28 PM
6

Red Pill TheoryCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 03:45 AM
5

CrisisEraDynamo/r/askTRP14/01/19 11:55 PM
3

Red Pill TheoryCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 11:19 PM
1

Red Pill TheoryCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:43 PM
0

MetaCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 11:20 AM
0

Red Pill TheoryCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 12:36 AM
0

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 11:59 AM
0

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 09:50 PM
0

MetaCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 03:31 PM
0

Ask Red PillCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 09:59 PM
0

Blue Pill ExampleCrisisEraDynamo/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 09:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Good insight. Thanks for shedding a bit more light on this. As I thought about it, I see women putting forth effort to look good as similar to male athletes pushing themselves physically to win games. Just because some athletes take it too far (doping, for example) doesn't mean sports are inherently bad. Likewise, just because some females go too far in pursuit of a perfect figure doesn't mean beauty is bad.
/r/askTRP15/01/19 03:43 AM
2

Dude this explains the feeling I've been having about girls who look like they do too much to themselves. Like they mark all the boxes for "beauty" but I get this uneasy feeling that it's all fake. I can't discern whether or not if it's genetic or not so biologically the primal part of my brain tells me not to fuck them. That's known as the Uncanny Valley. It can be quite unsettling. ​
/r/askTRP15/01/19 03:37 AM
1

Sounds interesting. Care to elaborate?
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 03:54 AM
-1

Go ahead and read the 48 page actual study from Cornell and tell me if you come away with anything other than a sense of disgust that studies like this are actually funded. I do come away with a sense of disgust at this. The NPR article is dangerously close to saying "Restricting speech actually makes people feel MORE comfortable speaking. So by limiting what you're allowed to say, we're actually INCREASING your freedom of speech!" (corrected "Restricting" above) That is the article's thrust -- …
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 01:54 AM
-1

Playing devil's advocate... We work in very diverse workplaces and need creative solutions to problems that may come up. As most workplaces aren't about social theory, having a PC norm helps everyone in the group come up with the volume of new ideas needed to tackle a problem. Talking about revolutionary communism misses the point; the average workplace isn't a revolutionary communist state.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 10:46 PM
18

An "option" will soon become a demand. A demand will soon become a requirement. The only consolation is that boys going through with this will advertise their betaness to the girls, making alphas easier to spot.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 05:52 PM
1

I was talking more about gonads than overall bone structure.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:29 PM
1

I think "multiple painful surgeries" will still be required even if sex reassignment makes use of this, since the shape likely doesn't change, just the underlying cells.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 01:09 PM
3

Literally or metaphorically through nebulous applications of "hate speech" law?
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 11:11 PM
5

They seem to think George Orwell's 1984 is an instruction manual.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 07:42 PM
13

Indeed. The aim, it seems, is to ban anything that might make a woman feel bad.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 05:15 PM
7

Explain how.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 04:47 PM
7

I think part of the reason my relationship was lucky enough to survive is because my husband doesn't tolerate any bullshit from me, so I know what his boundaries are and I respect him for having a spine. There's the trick right there. Your husband stands up for himself; he's not a pushover.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 06:17 PM
1

Enlightening. Thank you for your input. It's always good to hear from someone in the know.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 11:19 PM
1

I'm 100% aware of that. They would also use it to make people in general more naturally servile.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 02:09 AM
1

An informative answer. Just because you can edit a program doesn't mean you know how it works, or how all the parts will interact.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 02:08 AM
3

Indeed. Consider the computer; at first, just a glorified adding machine. Today, they touch every part of our lives. With something like this, the same could be said of genetic engineering.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 01:31 AM
2

Thanks for your answers, everyone. I did this because we have to be able to answer criticisms of our positions, no matter who they come from. This way, our positions will become stronger. I do not believe that all men are responsible for anything a man does. I sincerely wanted to ask how to answer a claim like this, since I have some sympathy for traditional sex roles in Western society. I am thankful for the answers I have received.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 12:47 AM
1

You mention India? Well, I raise you South Africa.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 10:50 PM
1

Safer, too. :)
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 03:25 AM
22

But now back to the notion of couples’ contentment: Is there any way to tell whether it’s the wife or the husband who becomes unhappy when the wife earns more? Does he think that she is threatening his manliness, or does she think that he’s a slacker? That may be impossible to answer, partly because of something I learned long ago from Alvin E. Roth, a Nobel laureate in economics last year. I call it Roth’s rule: In equilibrium, it’s impossible for you to be happier than your spouse. If you and …
/r/TheRedPill02/06/13 06:55 PM
4

I remember when Christian conservatives were the prudes trying to ban sexy pictures.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/13 02:45 PM
2

Read it -- it's not so bad. We have to broaden our horizons a bit.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/13 12:32 PM
2

It's the feminists who don't make me feel terribly happy. They're always trying to tell you what you're not allowed to say, read, watch, or be attracted to.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 10:07 PM
8

Feminists are overcontrolling and hateful. What else is new?
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 12:44 PM
16

Feminists censor speech they don't like. Pretty typical behavior. Here's what's funny: 1950s: Ban the lads' mags! They're an offense to God and to our children's morality! 2010s: Ban the lads' mags! They're an offense to feminism and to our children's morality! The same overcontrolling impulse rears its ugly head. Feminists are not only control freaks, they're little better than Christian conservatives who complain about these things.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 12:36 PM
0

Here's an interesting blog post on the topic.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 09:31 PM
21

It goes nicely with this article bemoaning the disappearance of the male provider while at the same time blasting their sexuality and denigrating their role in the family by saying that they don't really matter.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 05:59 PM
1

I think I heard of that one.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 04:31 PM
2

Can you give some examples? I mean, I believe you, I just want to know in case the topic of matriarchal societies comes up in my offline conversations.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 02:49 PM
3

I suspect that matriarchy is like communal living; it works best on a small scale, with lots of extended family and entrenched, traditional roles. Attempts to scale up the communal arrangements to fit industrialized society (communism) only create widespread corruption and poverty; likewise, scaling up the village matriarchy to fit modern conditions (Marriage 2.0) breeds caddishness and resentment. Besides, their culture was stagnant for so long, never becoming a large civilization like their Ha…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 02:29 PM
1

But what does this mean for our "red pill" theories regarding social organization? This site says that the Mosuo prove that marriage and male dominance aren't universal, since the Mosuo want to preserve their way of life despite the intrusion of modernity.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 12:41 PM
9

My view on them is this: It only lasted because of their relative isolation (marauding armies didn't consider them worth the trouble, I guess), as well as the closeness of traditional village life. But note these features as well: Men have a defined role in society -- and wouldn't you know, it's "provider!" They do all the hard work, while women maintain the household. Men get regular sex via "walking marriages." I strongly doubt that blue balls or nuclear rejections are common. In modern Americ…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 12:17 PM
3

Physical isolation seems to be the cause.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 12:06 PM
1

They're not talking about novels in the vein of Twilight and Fifty Shades of Gray. They're writing to actual people. many never actually expect to meet the guy. Let me introduce you to Canadian Inmates Connect, Inc. (Hat-tip to Roissy/Heartiste)
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 04:23 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 03:37 PM
1

Interesting. It's like you can see them squirming, kind of like Robert Putnam and his diversity study. Didn't catch that.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 08:12 PM
2

Duly noted. Didn't mean to be offensive; I just wanted to play devil's advocate.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 07:18 PM
7

I posted this article because I was worried about confirmation bias and echo chambering within the game and manosphere community. We pride ourselves on finding the truth, so we mustn't simply fall prey to false ideas that flatter us. Manosphere types see themselves as a counterculture; they fear that if they spoke their beliefs in public, they will be socially ostracized or even lose their jobs, which is why they use pseudonyms. Because they all have shared experiences of being rejected by women…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 11:46 AM
4

The researchers admit as much: Nevertheless, extending taxometric analysis to behavioral data represents a potentially valuable next step in this line of research.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 06:14 AM
2

I did run into that. Indeed, I wondered how sexual attraction triggers figured into this, and I also noticed that the NYT opinion piece (written by one of the researchers) linked in Susan Walsh's post suggested a political bias by using words like "traditional stereotypes" and "sexism," which are words that academics use as insults, signaling to the readers that the writer is describing a bad person. The article you linked thankfully doesn't delve into all of that, instead critiquing the methodo…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 06:00 AM
2

The "average differences" being referred to are likely the purely physical ones (strength, hormones, sex cells, etc.) It's implied here, emphasis mine: It is conceivable that the dimensional model fits how men and women see themselves but that analyses of actual behaviors would be more likely to reveal taxa (as our analyses of anthropometric and athletic behavior did).
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 04:32 AM
3

I'm well aware of "The Cathedral," but one of Roissy's constant refrains is that "science can't stop proving him right." Dodging a study like this simply because it questions our way of thinking just won't do.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 04:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter