TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Croosters Archive

View 10 posts and 189 comments by Croosters on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

To be fair, I was emotionally and physically abused by a woman I trusted.
/r/ExRedPill09/06/17 06:08 PM
0

Saying this kind of sexist shit without evidence is what causes women to leave in the first place dingbad.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 03:12 PM
1

This ought to explain why women score higher than men in STEM even on standardized (i.e blind) tests.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:05 PM
0

This ought to explain why.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:04 PM
0

Anecdotal evidence. Your own experience does not a statistical trend make.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:02 PM
-1

Have you maybe considered your attitude that "only a few women can do this shit" creates some sort of confirmation bias? Or that the fact you're bullying attitude is what pushes women (and minorities) away? Judging by your post there's a possibility that this might be a statistical anomaly, given that there are plenty of other conferences with woman and minority speakers that used this same type of thing. The fact you immediately jumped on one example rather than checking other conferences for a…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:02 PM
1

Biological differences only apply to heavy physical work, as the Norwegian Gender Paradox (and other similar appeals to nature) fail to take into account the economic factors involved (STEM pays better than childcare, so less men take childcare, thus making the percentage increase less noticeable) as well as the institutional hostility towards women in those fields (hence the leaky pipeline).
/r/MensRights18/04/17 11:13 AM
1

Feminist theory is perfectly reasonable if there's evidence next to it.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:02 AM
1

If parents are deciding you major then that explains it. Could it be that this is a societal role enforced on people?! I had no idea gender roles, even if applied to both sexes, had an affect on labor market segregation.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:37 PM
1

Are you a troll? I'm going through your post history and it seems your response to every argument is an insult. Are you able to respond to my arguments? I gave you a link, you didn't answer it.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:22 PM
1

Nope. Trades are by definition the dangerous jobs you're talking about. Shall I whip out a list of the most dangerous jobs? Cause my job (logging) is a trade and there's been efforts by feminists to get women into it.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:16 PM
1

5th_Law, read my god damn post. It doesn't mention any specifics.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:42 PM
1

I just cited it.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:42 PM
1

Link it if you will.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:04 PM
1

It doesn't have to mention it. The fact it wants to encoruage women to go into jobs that have high workplace fatalities means it addresses it by proxy.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:03 PM
1

Sigh 5th Law, if feminists are trying to get women in trades, they want to address the workplace fatality gap. And it says nowhere they want to get them only into safe trades. Stop adding your own reading of the article into the article.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:03 PM
1

The trades in general, 5th Law. That makes your comment true by implication.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:02 PM
1

The fact they want to get women into trades implies that.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:02 PM
1

Did you read the article 5th Law? It's about encouraging women to die more often in dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:53 PM
1

sigh Can you read the fucking link? It's exactly the opposite of what you just said. The fact someone is writing about it means they're trying to encoruage peoiple.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:52 PM
1

Nope. That's why feminists are fighting for it. You really have a genuine difficulty acknowledging the fact most of your arguments are being addressed. Tell me, do you have difficulty reading? Because I can cite you a comment here where you literally respond to me saying "the wage gap is caused by choices, therefore..." with "do you think women earn 70 cents on the man's dollar" even though I answered that question already in the very previous comment. You seem to be completely unable to actuall…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:21 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:18 PM
1

The mere fact this has been increasing since the 70's and is still increasing clearly shows that this is the case. If not feminists, the women themselves.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:34 PM
1

Necessity. Still doesn't disprove my point. But not working comparable hours to men. And they've only fought for equal representation in the good jobs. That's also increasing, btw. Kinda goes against your claim that women are kept out of these jobs. Because feminists are fighting to get them and keep them in. It isn't an absolute either/or.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 06:34 PM
1

Care to explains why the ratio of male-female housework has shrinked and the amount of women in STEM has increased? That's what I call adjusting preferences.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 01:57 PM
1

Haven't read the link haven't you? The evidence is hyper-linked in the text.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:11 AM
1

How about you actually respond to the articles points (which show why the gap exists, and yes, even if it isn't FOR THE SAME WORK, it EXISTS) instead of assuming my gender (I'm a dude) and using insults.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:39 PM
0

Wrong. Are your debating skills lacking?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:30 PM
1

I don't think that's an accurate depiction of society either. While I partly see where you're coming from, I think blaming suicides on fringe gender role enforcement is overly simplistic. Men not being allowed to express their emotions and having a much higher degree of gun ownership explains the high suicide rate. China not being authoritarian... That's a first, I must admit. By authoritarian, I thought meant a planned economy and a communist dictatorship. Exactly. This is pretty much my point.…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:42 PM
2

Exactly. I'm not for it. Whatever. I'm sorry to hear that, though I don't think it carries well into describing society. It might, given that these roles cause a lot of suicides. This kind of underlines the point further though. China is economically developed, but authoritarian. If I'm looking for a country with freedom and opportunity to choose, I'll try a country that is a bit more liberal. China is a market economy where people get to choose their jobs. Authoritarian countries would include …
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:00 PM
1

I'm generally opposed to gendered scholarships. Private people are free to do what they want, sure, but it's still sexist to reserve handouts for one gender. That's usually what those scholarships are. When it comes to education, assuming that it's public, I'd want it as gender neutral as possible. But there we have to get into the specific methods before I can really comment. Given education is not gender-equal (or race-equal for that matter), I oppose that. Ehh, mean words don't really put you…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:19 PM
3

Apparently, unless you account for reservation wages. A study in Germany found it to account for enough that the gap became statistically insignificant. While I don't agree with your goals, I won't really argue as long as the methods offered are fine. Most feminist methods consist of education and offering private scholarships. This is the same thing they do in my field (woodworking). Or are they based on social roles that take biological leanings within groups into account, and cater to the cho…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:42 PM
4

Answer my comment. No amount of "MUH CHOICES!" is going to change the fact that there's a 5% gap that's unexplained and that those choices need changing, as they're based on outdated social roles that enslave people.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:26 AM
2

Stop misrepresenting what I say.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:08 PM
1

Sigh Yes. 5th Law, I am aware.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:08 PM
1

Yeah, zhe thought it was a problem that Feminists don't give a shit about this. ... you do realize she's a feminist, right?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:45 PM
1

Address the arguments, not the source.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:43 PM
1

No it doesn't. It says "and that's a problem". Christ, 5th Law, can you read?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:43 PM
1

If you'll notice in my other comment, I have a post in a feminist question sub asking that and getting support.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:22 PM
1

You'll notice in my post history how I'm asking the question now on r/AskFemmeThoughts and that feminists are supportive of me bringing that up
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:21 PM
1

Look up "White feminism" for feminists criticizing other feminists?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:52 PM
1

Yes it is. Look up "white feminism". Feminists criticizing other feminists is a thing.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:54 PM
1

Funny, last time I brought this up with a feminst she accused me of wanting more dead or injured women. Interesting. I've never experienced this. Can you find me examples of feminsts pushing quotas to get more women in to these areas? Most feminists do not push strict quotas. Most prefer education and female-only scholarships.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:54 PM
1

Things Feminists won't complain about: the work/life balance gap and the work place fatality gap. Citation needed. They're ok with men working more in dangerous jobs. Just so long as they aren't paid more. Citation needed. No you haven't. For the love of Jesus Christ stop telling me what I have and have not experienced.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:53 PM
1

I believe that anyone who met you would want to discuss your autism with you, but the rest is a fabrication. Given I've had a girl walk out on a date with me after I revealed it, this is nonsense. If your women's center discusses men it's in a "men are toxic and need to be taught not to rape" way which feminists pretend is them helping men. Once again, stop lecturing me about what I experienced. Your own personal opinions of what they say is useless. Stop putting words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:52 PM
0

Culture affects choices.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:51 PM
2

I have been to many feminist gatherings. Many Apologies if I somehow doubt that. All they talk about is menstruation, mythical wage gap, less representation in STEM fields while still claiming feminism is for everyone. Wage gap still exists. It's just mostly because of choices that are the results of gender roles, something conservatives won't mention because A) They approve of said gender roles and B) It would torpedo their attempts to stall maternity pay and leave. That, and a small percentage…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:06 AM
1

Because the feminists (like me) who are fighting for dangerous jobs get less air time because we have less money to spend on slick marketing campaigns. That, and working class people have little to no time to spend on activism. Most of my female colleagues are too busy working ten hours a day to spend that time on professional activism.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:06 AM
2

Keep telling yourself that :)
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:01 PM
2

Keep telling yourself that ;)
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:48 PM
2

It's the Women's Center at my college. Yes, they do talk about men's issues. In fact, they offered me some time to talk about autism.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:37 PM
2

I love how in the first one you don't actually answer it. I think we're done. Buh bye.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:22 PM
2

That's odd. I see this discussed all the time in the feminist organization I volunteer.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:46 PM
1

Yep. You're floundering. How are you so bad at this? Also notice how I said "legitimate researcher" and your mind interpreted that as "some guys blog"? Which you then proceeded to misinterpret? You're so far out of your element it's almost sad. That's not saying what you think it's saying. It's discouraging government intervention. If you watch the linked video by Steven Horwitz, he admits discirmination is a thing. So no, I am in my element. Oh you dear simple idiot child: : Calls person an idi…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:45 PM
1

Great so it's agreed that women oppress men with gender roles those men are powerless to resist. If they were powerless to resist, feminists wouldn't be educating people. So what can we do to train women to leave men alone? You're not making sense. Then women are oppressing themselves. People are oppressing themselves. That's the nature of patriarchy. Ahahaha! "It's so unfair he gets paid more just because he works harder. Make him work less!" That's not what I said. I said a lot of men would li…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:35 PM
4

Dude, your own source says the trivial remaining gap is due to a variety of factors and not simply "muh patriarchy!" Read the final two paragraphs You're floundering. Nope. No feminist has ever claimed women get paid something like 70% what a man does for the same work? For the same work? No. You sure about that? Yes. Want to stake your (tattered) reputation on it? You aren't the arbiter of what is and isn't reputable. So yeah, they're making choices to make themselves happy. They could be happi…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:30 PM
1

Aha, so men are opressed in this way? Gender double standards affect men to. Which let me guess, are entirely created by men and entirely oppressive to women. Are created by society and apply to both. You know it's funny, I've never seen feminists insist women sacrifice their work life balance gap to close the wage gap. They actually insist men take time off. Something I think no man will deny. Or the workplace fatality gap. That's odd. There were feminists at my trade school encouraging women t…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:58 PM
4

Which no legitimate researcher has attributed to misogyny. Wrong. But I'm glad you've admitted that the original feminist claim, that women earn 70% what men do for the same work, is a complete and utter lie. And what is actually happening is that women are placing free time, comfort, safety, family, etc before earnings because there is less pressure on them to prove their worth to society by accumulating wealth so they can have safer, happier, longer and more balanced lives. No feminist says th…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:57 PM
1

It's not entirely choices. There's always a small part that's unexplained. Then there's the earnings gap and the fact women are shoehorned into less paying jobs because gender roles. I've met a lot of feminists that criticize the prison gap.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:30 PM
3

I can see banging my head against this particular wall of ignorance isn't going to work. Projection certainly is your strong suit. Is it impossible for you to actually read what I say. You'll just keep repeating the "women are opressed because they are" routine and running back to your AMR safe space for affirmation. "Women are oppressed because gender roles" =/= "Women are oppressed because they are" Let's try this: do you believe there is a gap between men and women in work/life balance? Yes. …
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:29 PM
3

Educated on what? On the fact that society treats them as different than men and oftentimes inferior. Women already face massive biases in their favor in education. Representation in college admissions =/= Bias. Men just prefer trades. And no, CHS's War against Boys has been debunked. But women make bad choices. They need to be educated. Not all women. Just a lot of them. You can't educate yourself out of ignorance using only your own ignorance. Refer to above. That's pretty much what you said t…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:25 PM
3

Ok, so women are damaged by their own stupid choices and someone else needs to make decisions for them. Once again, they need to be educated. If women are so stupid they can't figure this all out then the ones encouraging them and liberating them from their female idiocy must be men. That's why most if not all people involved in this process are women. So men need to be empowered to tell women what is best for them. Nope.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:16 PM
3

Ah so women are discriminated against by the choices they make. Not discriminated against. Damaged by would be a better word. Which means that to be liberated they need some strong central authority to tell them what to do. Nope. Simply encouraging them to analyze their behaviors and changing them. That and using the occasional quota to incentivize them.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:10 PM
5

Nope. I believe that most of the wage gap is due to choices and that there is a small gap due to unexplained factors and discrimination (namely 2 to 5 cents). I also believe those choices are caused by restrictive gender roles and that should be criticized. The reason I know this is because many women in traditionally male-dominated fields complain of harassment and a hostile work environment and therefore leave. The fact women are the primary, default caregivers is another such role. You'll not…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:43 PM
4

It's not a myth at all. Even if it's solely because of choices, it stands to reason those choices are caused by culture. It's like how states with a generous social welfare system towards mothers have less of a gap than those that don't.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:11 PM
2

Ugh Stefan Molyneux. This is the same idiot that said women who choose assholes are to blame for genocide.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:26 PM
0

Employers, in general, get to decide whom they hire. They get to decide what power they give. They also get to decide how much of the workers' wages they sequester. I had some idea of that before that. The glass ceiling presupposes that women can't reach the top. But, clearly they do. So, there is no glass ceiling. A better analogy would be that of a magnet that holds them back. Oh, why is that? Because you aren't able to refute a proposition like "women in general prefer to raise children than …
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:10 PM
-5

I don't of barriers against women in society. But, even if they do exist, having your body attacked is more serious than getting denied a job. You can get another job. Or women might marry someone who will provide for her. Men can't get a ridged band or a frenulum after circumcision. Glass ceiling. Look it up. No, it's not like that. To say that it results from men having power in society implies that men having power necessarily implicates men... at least those who have power in society. Like t…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:09 PM
-8

It's simply absurd to say that getting forcibly strapped down to a table, having your penis forcibly penetrated by a metal object, then having your penis forcibly made to penetrate a foreign object, and having bodily structure permanently removed in the process does not amount to oppression. Because this is so ridiculously important compared to all the systemic barriers against women in society. Not inherent to men, but it results from men having power in society. Yeah... not a lick of sense her…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:35 PM
1

How many times am I going to have to explain this to reactionaries...
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:36 PM
1

I don't hate myself because I am male. Who gave you that idea?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 12:38 PM
1

Mary Koss was active several decades ago and has recanted her statements. And we're in the US, not India and Israel. So no, I am not encouraging more rape in North America.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 12:37 PM
0

Irrelevant. It's still working.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 12:35 PM
0

It only means they are the ones most cared about. Who expect assistance. Male victims who rightly lack confidence they will get woman-level sympathy will more often not sacrifice their time and hopes. I've gotten woman-level sympathy from feminists. In fact, I got even more sympathy because at the time the law stated I couldn't be raped. They changed it for me.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:08 AM
-1

What stuff? Please provide some convincing evidence that millions died as a result of the idea of cultural Marxism. Ummm.... the Holocaust? WWII?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:07 AM
1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:02 AM
-1

Promoting stuff that led to the mass murder of millions is not something I think is good, tbh.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:02 AM
0

But given many are reported and most of them are reproted by women, we can make an educated guess.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:02 AM
1

I believe there are more men are falsely accused of rape than raped women falsely accused of lying about it. The second part is untrue, given punishments are only metted out for false accusations only in the worse of circumstances.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:01 AM
-1

But that second half isn't true... You've literally admitted you think traditional gender roles and male disposability is a part of the natural ordder through this post. Of coruse it's true.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:44 AM
1

You do realize the fact I'm posting here means I'm not ocnfined to a safe space right? You're really monumentally stupid.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:44 AM
0

YOu make some decent points. I'll read the rest.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:38 AM
1

Hence why I am debating you at this very moment.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:38 AM
2

As opposed to you pinging me in your safe space. You really aren't that self-aware are you?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:37 AM
-2

Do you acknowledge the fact that feminism isn't about equality? Feminism is about women's rights specifically aiming at equality. I'll gladly admit equality isn't the primary goal of feminism only if you acknowledge the MRM is really just a voice for sexist gender essentialists like you to voice their opinions.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:37 AM
0

Nationalism is the love and support of one's nation and identity. And the suspicion, avoidance and oftentimes outright hatred of that what is not your nation and identity. I agree that governments love to wave the flag in times of trouble as a smokescreen, but I would call that statism. Nationalism is by its definition statist. Anarchism, even it's laissez-faire capitalist variants, requires internationalism and open borders. The Nationalism that I or especially a guy named /u/Alt-Right-is-risin…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 10:41 PM
0

Feminism isn't about equality, that's the veil covering the dagger. Just like nationalism, which is a veil covering the dagger of the elite desperately scrambling to explain massive economic inequality. Feminism is about division and cultural marxism. You know cultural marxism was and is a Nazi concept right?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:43 PM
0

"Making fun of your argument for laughs sake" =/= "My argument being incorrect" Your false equivalencies are getting annoying.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:42 PM
3

Can you find an example of communism working? Yes. I know how this works. We need to disprove your beliefs or else they're true. And every study or example that refutes your faith is flawed. Nope. I was simply saying that because one example (the Kibbutz) is used to show that work naturally falls along certain lines, any attempt at equalizing is seen as disrupting the natural order. That's essentially what you're saying. You're also not "disproving" patriarchy. You're simply enforcing it through…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:37 PM
3

Based off rejecting patriarchy. Rejecting patriarchy yet embracing a patriarchal religion is contradictory. Simply saying something overtly and doing something in practice are two different things You think "nu uh, here's some Latin" is an argument? No, I think pointing out the fact that just because something happened after something it happened because of isn't an argument. In no way does that argue they have no gender roles. It argues that they're far more equal than we are and that the work …
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:16 PM
4

They were an isolated cult. Based off of Judaism, a patriarchal religion. Oh look, Latin, clearly you know what you're talking about. Answer the argument. It means after therefore because of. Quick: find all the isolated tribes that defaulted to having zero gender roles. Oh! Oh! I know! The Aka tribe!
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:58 PM
3

This is not entirely true. They were surrounded by patriarchal norms and practiced Judaism, a patriarchal religion. This is simply a case of a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:42 PM
3

I hope you told the church lawyers to fetch a 2 million check or fuck off. It was more of the "Drop charges or we will sue you for slander" variety.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:31 PM
-8

Well understand that it's far more common that this would happen to a woman so don't mansplain the situation and make it all about you. Women have it worse! There's nothing wrong about admitting that it happens more often to women. And I have never, ever heard feminists say anything about mansplaining. In fact, every feminist I've ever met has been extremely supportive. It kinda was. Many people believe rape is something that men do to women. No it actually wasn't. I was a teenager at the time. …
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:20 PM
3

Good. You're a regular AMR poster and they generally assume male victims aren't real or don't matter. That's completely the opposite to my experience. They just believe it's not nearly paritous. If you're male you weren't believed because of your gender. I was a man raped by an older man. It wasn't because of that, it was because the Catholic Church had their lawyers pressure me to recant. Except the actions your lot proposes to "end rape culture" guarantee more innocent men will be jailed. In t…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:07 PM
6

I do realize that. As a victim of sexual assault, I feel that these kinds of cases are one of the many reasons I was not believed (added to the fact the person who did it to me was a "pillar of the community" similar to Ted Bundy). I have sympathy for genuine victims of a FRA, though I still believe it's quite uncommon and not something that should overrule action to end rape culture.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:44 PM
88

Sometimes I wonder how many times this is going to have to happen before feminists take action on it. This kind of shit discredits genuine victims of rape and pours gasoline on the fire that is the problem of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:34 PM
1

Towards the end of this video, she talks about it being due to gender roles.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:25 AM
1

I gave you plenty of actual examples, of women achieving the top positions in Canada, and the special advantages they gain in achieving success, not just pointing out that the law doesn't prohibit women from high achievement. Proportions, proportions.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 09:47 PM
1

Prove it.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 09:37 PM
-1

There are no laws prohibiting women from succeeding, there are legal protections against discriminating against women, there are scholarships and other support systems promoting female success that men simply don't get access to. De jure equality =/= De facto equality
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:44 PM
1

This is irrelevant. A human being has the ability to make whatever choices they want. If a woman decides to become an elementry school teacher, its 100% her choice. Even if society "expects her to care for children," she still chose that profession. Its the most obvious in colleges. Anyone, at any time, can chose to change their major to STEM, yet most women remain in the social sciences. In my culture, women are the majority in STEM because "they want to earn a lot and honor their family". That…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:53 PM
0

Excellent so really this is due to female privilege. Privilege implies the ability to be viewed higher in a society. Men monopolize higher end jobs and oftentimes enfroce their sexist prejudices to remain there. But can you acknowledge that women are not in fact paid less for the same work? Nope. Here's why.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:42 PM
-2

You could "prove" creationism by forcing a student to use only creationist sources in their presentation and banning the use of legitimate scientific sources. Yet I've shown that there are business/government sources that agree with the professor. Then again, the way she phrased it seemed horribly culty. That's basically what's happening here. Everyone outside this sad little cult rejects the wage gap idiocy. So they.... Banned the use of any info from outside the cult. Except, you know, Kate An…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:32 PM
-26

She actually doesn't. The glass ceiling is a well established fact, even by business and government sources, which evidently lack the feminist bias that plague so-called "feminist" sources. In fact, here's a government source proving it.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:38 AM
-12

I don't have a negative bias against men's issues given that i'm a man and they affect. I dislike the MRM's spin on them however. Their beliefs were challenged. In fact, she posted a response showing how her views were wrong.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:28 AM
0

Do women not also value wealth and achievement? To a lesser extent and in lesser numbers. I can speak only for myself. Do other people, women in particular, not have a drive to be the best they can be in their chosen profession? To see the highest levels of success they can rise to? Do we as a society really have control over what different groups of people value? Should we dictate to them what they should value, or force them to value particular things More often than not, they're discouraged f…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:12 AM
-12

And this is wrong why?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:02 AM
-29

Interesting you do nothing to debunk the arguments the professor makes about the glass ceiling.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:39 AM
-25

Business sources more often than not make the assumption the choices women make exist in a vacuum. It's the assumption "feminists" like Christina Hoff Sommers seem to parrot as absolute fact. They also deny the reality of the glass ceiling, which is mostly the cause for the gap. Furthermore, as I show in my comment below, they more often than not focus on one very cherry-picked part of the economy.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:39 AM
-30

The reality is indeed patriarchy. She responded quite calmly to the students' assertions, debunking them using a concept she missed. If you interpret equality as oppression, you might be privileged.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:37 AM
-7

To be fair, business sources do have a tendency of being quite partial as well as focusing on only one aspect of the gap. Furthermore, the "muh choices" argument fails to realize WHY women make those choices. In fact, it's tangentially related to men's rights: men are expected to work long hard hours and are judged by their wealth and achievements, something you all ought to try understanding. For example. this commonly cited stat only applies to a very narrow group of people. This excludes wome…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:30 AM
1

College girls couldn't care less about money.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:39 PM
1

DUFF is the term you're looking for. Designated Ugly Fat Friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 07:29 PM
1

So it's okay if you sleep around but not him?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:40 PM
1

True. One is completely and utterly disgusting and one is self-aware and completely and utterly disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:56 AM
2

Then stop wailing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:46 AM
1

Just like Family Guy, which I've started abhorring the more mature I've become.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:45 AM
3

People don't give a shit.* People want their interests best served. They'll use whatever hypocritical moralizing they need.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:43 AM
1

I don't watch Girls for this reason. It's just real life to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:29 AM
2

Am I supposed to empathize?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:29 AM
2

The fact the main character is an utterly entitled girl that dates men that treat her like crap, the fact Jessa gets an abortion under flimsy pretexts, all of which are inadvertently promoted by sexual liberation should be noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:58 PM
3

Guilty as charged. Any way to change it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:41 PM
3

And if you think the way SATC represents women is very similar to the way RP describes women, you just admitted that RP has a very accurate view on the modern woman. Indeed. I never said otherwise. Whether or not they should be judged for what they do (by men who wholesale indulge themselves in what you claim is wrong) is another question entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:28 PM
5

I don't think a non-RP person is actually the right person to say if that show is RP or not. I fail to understand how a FEMINIST show could be RP. "Is the show Sex and the City a source of inadvertent red pill truths about women from the mouths of the female characters themselves?" would be a fantastic rephrasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:23 PM
5

You've watched ONE episode and then you think you understand what the show is all about? I've watched the entire series and I'm not dumb enough to link all of it. There may be one male character or another who may act like a RP would, but the whole philosophy of the show is feminist, they wanted to spread feminist, super sexually-liberated values to a whole generation of women and they were very successful at doing it, unfortunately. I don't give a fuck. It still confirms what TRP thinks about w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:16 PM
1

I've never seen trp pound anything in, it offers it Under pain of being called a blue pill mangina. rp doesn't care about male bad behavior, it isn't a sub for dating men Fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:09 PM
4

I just did. Hence why I gave you the link. All the ideas preached by TRP (maybe not RPW, but then again, I never visit it) seem to spring out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:06 PM
2

It is inadvertently redpill like the show Girls. Yay! First person who got my point! ...Because trp is for men seeking women? It mentions several truths TRP pounds into their cultists with a hammer, which I mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:04 PM
3

Sex and the City is feminist bullshit disguised as a lame comedy only to fool some gullible ladies. Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:04 PM
1

Not really. I don't discuss intimate details of my family dynamics to strangers on Reddit (saying I was almost aborted doesn't count as that).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 01:33 PM
1

I probably should. Then again, I don't like to spend money on money-grabbing pricks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:38 AM
1

Indeed. Hence character.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:37 AM
1

Believe me, it is. That's a topic for another day.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:31 AM
1

I feel it now. The fact I never could've lived.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:29 AM
1

I'll keep that to myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:29 AM
1

Indeed, yes. Think about it. You're a nascent life, you get terminated because of someone else's decision. Let that sink in, and don't let feminist bilge get in your way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:29 AM
1

I'm very pro-contraception, though I'd prefer it if people would keep it between their legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:28 AM
1

Makes sense if you see it that way. Then again, she considered murder, which makes you feel down in many ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:28 AM
1

Abortion is what I'm talking about. Because of her "financial problems", she wants to terminate you. Basically the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:27 AM
1

Step 1 Check. Step 2 Check. Step 3. Check Step 4. Why should I care about living? I really really enjoy it and feel awful that someone would take it away by personal choice (not having means no creation and no creation means no destruction)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:25 AM
1

Oh yes, I do. You wouldn't understand, you're just another "personal choice advocate".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:23 AM
1

My grandfather intervened.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:23 AM
0

Reflect about it. Your own mother doesn't care about you, to the point where she wants to kill you to satisfy her own desires. Let that sink in. I did the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:22 AM
1

Feminists don't care about people's lives unless it benefits women directly. I could've just been a pawn for women's rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:18 AM
1

You don't know what it's like to have your life almost slashed from you without even being given the chance to fight back. Until then, I'm going to stick with my guns.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:17 AM
2

I was somewhat thinking that. Thanks for giving another perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:11 AM
3

Though I think TRP wildly exaggerates the amount of sex average women can get, it is pretty safe to say they can get objectively more by several times over. Personally, I really don't know how she acts behind closed doors or how she feels deep down, so I won't comment on that. I don't "blame the gender" as much as I blame the narcissistic culture and desperation of men in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 02:49 PM
6

When you talk to a 5 that's a slut talking about how she banged a 6'3" stud and strings along good men merely for the thrills, all your beliefs that men and women have it equal go out the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:22 AM
3

An abundance mentality is when you don't put individual women above others sexual, not having a lot of women in your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:36 PM
2

They are, however there's a difference between having a woman you have a friendly relationship with and a woman you literally spend all your time with. Everyone deduces the latter as you loving her, and that's the thing TRP complains the most about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:35 PM
1

Most redpillers would tell you that they'd rather be the guy everybody dislikes but gets crazy pussy (as many of these guys do, regardless what BluePill dogma says) than being the person everybody likes but gets friendzoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:27 PM
5

TRP only wants to nail the hottest women, and the hottest women usually have hordes of men that want to be their "friends" not in the friendship sense, if you get what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:13 PM
1

Indeed I would, based purely on moral principle, unlike many of the snivelers on TRP and MensRights that keep whining about it. Like I expect women to own up to their mistakes, I expect to own up to mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 02:05 PM
2

A pro-life pro-women's rights (and no, abortion isn't a right no matter how hard you yammer about it) asexual that is interested in finding alternative ways of funding government healthcare, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:52 PM
1

That's indeed what I mean. And yes, it is usually a year. The stipend increases depending on factors currently affecting the economy, like inflation and public spending.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:42 PM
1

A stipend is an insured contribution to the fund by tax money. On that stipend, depending on the country and the investments authorized, they make a 50-100% profit, i.e earning half or as much in profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:28 PM
1

As I said higher, the Texas education system, which, despite teaching some "alternative" ideas in the classroom, pays for itself quite nicely. The fund receives a small stipend each year from tax money and earns about a 50-100 percent profit by the end (funded by bonds purchased previously and stocks traded during the year). It'd be very hard to raise enough money to make enough money using that way, and would be nearly impossible to make any profit during recession.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:02 PM
1

Some economist might come up with one. I haven't found any on my own private research, so I'll go further in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:53 PM
1

I like the possibility of a universal public healthcare system, however I'm interested to see if there's other possibilities of funding it other than taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:46 PM
1

I can see where you're coming from, but I'd prefer a woman have labor cramps for some time than murder a being.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:50 PM
1

Forcing someone to own up their mistake is not torture.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:47 PM
1

Oh this timbit. That zygote inside you is not "your body".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:44 PM
1

I think we're at an impasse about this, so discussing it further won't yield much results.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:40 PM
1

Mostly because you couldn't care less about unborn kids if it got in the way of "gender equality".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:35 PM
1

What you just said proves my "It's preferable, but I'm not stupid enough to believe it is possible" comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:47 PM
1

Some can do it, but it requires a lot more discipline than even certain "pious" people have (hint: simply believing in something as hard as you can doesn't decrease sex drive). There are certain Buddhist and Daoist techniques to reduce it, namely Qi Gong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:40 PM
0

I'd personally prefer being an asexual person tbqh.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:20 PM
1

Ever heard of abstinence? It doesn't work much, but that's because of lack of discipline.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:15 PM
1

If people didn't fuck outside of procreation, we wouldn't even have to think about this. And I wouldn't have gotten what I did and what so many other kids like me did.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:13 PM
1

Sexual promiscuity first and bastards resulting second. As for BC for cramps and not fucking left right center, I'm open to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:10 PM
1

Ironically, yes. I'd prefer having not existed then be stuck in a mortal coil.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:06 PM
1

Given the fact I'm a bastard (an actual bastard, not the insult) and my mother abandoned me to pursue casual sex citing feminist talking points, and that many people have experienced the same thing, I'm going to vote for my peeps here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:03 PM
1

If put that way, then yes they should have it. It's the other second part I'm worried about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:00 PM
1

Congratulations on having less cramps. Not all people use their free birth control for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:55 PM
2

And it's not like people are going to just stop having sex. I said I opposed extra-reproductive sex in another comment and I also admitted I'd be an idiot to believe people would believe the same outside of convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:54 PM
0

"That's fair. Then I don't want to pay for any shit people need b/c of their own stupidity. Smoked your entire life and got cancer? tough titties. Drive reckless and got into a car accident? Oh so sad, too bad." Reductio ad absurdum gone wrong. Killing an unborn human is different than assisting someone who did something unhealthy to themselves. "As a conservative in Canada this is the cheapest way." I'm very curious as to ways to make procedures available out of methods other than raising taxes…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:54 PM
2

It would be preferable, yes, but I'd be a moron to think other people think that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:22 PM
-1

A person shouldn't have to pay for something they don't find morally acceptable. And yes, it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:22 PM
1

http://www.choiceinhealth.ca/Page.asp?IdPage=8920
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:15 PM
1

Feminism is about getting an abortion and letting other people foot the bill for your mistake (It actually is. Feminists keep demanding taxpayer money for that.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:09 PM
3

Feminism tends to give an idea to women to use their sexuality however they feel like, and many of them take it as an order to string men on and to do whatever they feel like.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:03 PM
2

Cheating mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:39 PM
0

I understand the part about controlling cramps related to menstruations, but I bet most women won't be using birth control only for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:38 PM
1

"Despising" is a very strong word that seems to be applied to anything that's emotionally charged over here. People don't really "despise" betas as much as look down to them on the proverbial social totem pole all people are in. At best, women tend to ignore them more than anything else. At worst, they gossip about them in negative fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:31 PM
0

The best example is how people support women who've slept around and got abortions without consulting the father. Another could be the constant crusade for free birth control. I could go on and on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:29 PM
3

Why feminism tends to give passes to women for sexually manipulative mishaps they make and tend to overly exaggerate those men make?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:28 PM
8

The many times on r/relationships where they always side with the woman even though it's been shown she's partly to blame. The many times women are given a large berth in domestic violence cases. I can keep naming more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:21 PM
1

Thank you for your response. It was concise and engaging, though I personally doubt the statement "men still cheat more". Given the fact I've shown that women lie about their sexual pasts more and that this doesn't show up on social science literature of this kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter