TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CruelCrow Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by CruelCrow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

He was legally found to be not guilty (and even then only by mistrial), which means legally we treat him as not guilty. Witch hunts are bad, and there are many cases where people are treated as guilty when they shouldn't be, but that doesn't mean he didn't commit a crime and it doesn't mean he shouldn't be held socially accountable for it.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:59 AM
1

I hated that book, or at least the "proper" interpretation that they gave us of it. When people say equality nobody means equal in every single ability and physical attribute, they mean equal in terms of rights and opportunities.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:01 PM
1

It might help you if you try to do something about your feelings (ironically I find this phrase somewhat annoying to be told, sorry). If you're angry, it's a natural response, and while it can dissipate with time or keeping your mind occupied, you aren't actually addressing the cause of your stress. Have you tried anything that confronts it more directly? Writing, perhaps? Even if you don't publish it anywhere, it could help you "focus" what your frustration in a more organized way. A lot of the…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:10 PM
2

It seems like a really sucky option to have to start over in a different country but it's really (probably) a more viable option. OP, it is indeed a terrible system, and it sounds like not much else in the situation is going to change, so you just have to decide how you want to live. The set up is taking almost everything you have and will continue to do so for nearly two more decades. Oh the irony, leaving America in order to gain freedom. We've come a long way.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:47 PM
1

Oh, sorry, it's on mobile, it might not be displaying properly, I only saw the thumbnail image. My bad!
/r/MensRights02/06/16 10:08 PM
4

I hate the movements like these that "promote/enable minorities" by beating down majority groups in turn (e.g. quotas). They claim to combat racism, sexism, yet it is inherently more discriminatory because it's giving people opportunities based solely based on their race or gender. The hypocrisy is astounding.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 10:00 PM
3

Of relationships where violence is shown but not returned (reciprocated), 70.7% of them were initiated by women. Does that phrasing help?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:53 PM
68

I wish all of the "protestors" who keep disrupting these events of people like Milo would keep tape on their mouths.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:47 PM
1

I don't really see gender roles as sexist, but rather a trend. If gender roles were strictly enforced, somehow, I would see it as sexist and unfair. But they really aren't. You can be a female athlete, or a male hair stylist if you want to. It's outside of the "norm" but it's an option that's available. Sure, people will almost certainly criticize you, and there are probably hardships you'll have to overcome, but those will always exist regardless of what you do. Instead of self-victimizing and …
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:21 AM
5

I agree, but in general (not sure about this instance specifically) there are some cases where it can help with emphasis because of the way brains process. 21 years actually sounds longer to me than 7700 days so I don't understand what the purpose was but maybe they intended for it to sound longer or shorter.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:07 AM
4

Alternatively, for every year served by a woman, a man serves 1.63 years, and for every woman incarcerated 2 men are. I like ratios :)
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:21 PM
1

I need to as well, took me a while to find it again. Also, I apologize if it sounded like I was saying you were doing the victim thing - didn't mean it to sound aggressive. Just meant meanings on these sorts of things have a lot of leeway.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:47 AM
3

There's your problem - you're assuming it has a definite meaning. It means whatever someone wants it to be so that they can play the victim card. This blog post pretty much sums up my stance on objectification: https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/objectification-overruled/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:06 AM
32

That's actually a really strong argument, and reading through the amended complaint PDF from the article, they compared it to the usage of the word "whore" and how it can mean an actual status/occupation but is often used as a gender oriented slur. Seems like he has a solid case, I'm wishing him luck.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:38 PM
3

That's my point exactly. Not every culture functions this way, I was just trying to explain why it is that some cultures do consider it taboo if not completely illegal.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:48 PM
1

I'd guess that it has to do with female breasts being more sensitive (I could be wrong, I can't actually find any sources or studies on nerve endings at the moment), and thus are considered more erotic, and society tends to teach that expression of sexuality is bad in public. I.e. women's breasts have become more associated with eroticism and sensuality, either from biological differences or from a historical root (likely religion) that set a standard. I'd guess the latter has more influence.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:36 PM
2

It's a business. Let them do what they want. It's obviously just a marketing tactic, since they have to buy a meal to get it. Ideally I don't even have a problem with businesses denying service to a group because another business could come in and do the same thing except get a larger market and thus out-compete them. Give it a rest.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:26 PM
16

They absolutely should be able to. Mental health professionals should be held up to the highest standards and criticisms - they're being trusted with the sanity of others, in many cases. I can't find much information on this case in particular, so I don't know enough details to make any real judgement, but the thought of a minor being turned against her own family... sickening.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:51 PM
1

Firstly, I refuse to use the word "circumcision". I call it what it is - male genital mutilation. Notice how much of an outcry female genital mutilation (female "circumcision") received, and how much more rare it is in most modern countries. Most sources I've seen say that FGM is far worse than MGM but either way, it's genital mutilation and neither is okay. However, I was circumcised young too. Honestly, I won't lie - I think I prefer not having foreskin (aesthetically and maybe functionally sp…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:39 PM
2

This is true and from the arguments I've seen I think I agree that all businesses (except for government or government funded organizations) should be allowed to choose who they service. You can't be a business that discriminates if you want to maximize your profits (so it's ironic when people say "greedy racist/sexist") because in most cases a competitor could simply choose to open a similar service that will serve more people and ergo will likely do better. (Note that I'm not saying Curves or …
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:49 PM
3

To me the larger problem isn't even really whether they can or can't deny business to a certain group, it's the lack of consistency. Laws should mean the same thing to everyone or they mean nothing to anyone.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:24 AM
20

Egalitarianism is the more common term and basically covers equal rights for everybody, it's how I would identify. Partly because of what modern feminism has become, but also because I think equality should apply to everybody, not just for females, not just across gender, but it should apply to everyone.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:21 PM
2

There are some differences in statistics and how they're interpreted. There are about 7 million more women in the U.S. (158.6 mil vs 151.4 mil) although I'm not sure if that would make that much of a difference. SEER estimates that about men have a 1/7 chance of a prostate cancer diagnosis while women have a 1/8 chance of a breast cancer diagnosis. Either way, 50x more funding (if it's true) is a bit excessive but that has more to do with the way the organizations get funding and you couldn't re…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:54 AM
-6

To be fair, women have it rough in a lot of cases. It's pretty hard to defend yourself when you have a giant human parasite inside of you that makes you slowly while draining the nutrients you take in, or when you're bleeding from places that seem like they should definitely not be bleeding. Edit: Wew, downvotes galore. Obviously I don't mean that a majority of women who are pregnant will be in a combat situation. It's evolution, genders are specialized for different things.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:08 PM
1

Shit, I was trying to put together an elaborate reasoning and justification as a response but that first line sums it up perfectly. I'm saving that gem.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter