TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cryhavok101 Archive

View 0 posts and 435 comments by Cryhavok101 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How many years old is that message? I know it's more than ten, I'm pretty sure I saw it when I got my first smart phone.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/22 05:37 PM
1

Or just keep a record of names they have gone by in the past. Most background checks I know of do that.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/22 04:59 PM
20

The loss of roe v wade is going to be a lot more far reaching than just abortion rights, and I suspect almost everyone in the country will regret it at one point or another.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:58 AM
2

I've seen it several times in the last week.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/22 06:06 PM
14

I read a post somewhere about how this 5'10" guy finally met his sister's "6 ft" boyfriend, and they were the same height.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/22 06:04 PM
1

Happy wife, happy life used to imply that you invest in your wife's happiness, and she takes care of yours. A lot of jackasses don't understand that and think that it means you are magically made happy by investing in her happiness and she does nothing for you, but the magic makes you happy... magically.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/22 11:16 PM
6

They would have been alone, her with a male student. Nope the fuck out of ANY no witness situation. Witnesses should be there for all participants protection and wellbeing.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:16 PM
32

PP is getting away with something you shouldn't be doing, because you are a woman. Nothing even remotely like that happened. PP is not "having a biased, uninformed opinion and being a woman."
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/21 09:41 AM
90

She had a hypothesis, conducted an experiment to prove it, and when it was disproven, adjusted her mindset based on the data she obtained. There was no pussypass being invoked or denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/21 09:32 AM
2

May not be breaking any rules, but all screen caps of posts are reposts by definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/21 11:49 AM
5

No shame, but that's a weird kink.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 01:44 PM
1

The dictionaries did that more than a hundred years ago. It's been in the english lexicon that way since the 1700s. Common sense lost that battle so long ago no one alive still remembers the war.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 01:40 PM
2

I am talking about hiding from them because you know they are onto you and have been looking for you for a little bit of time now. That's not something you can actually know until you catch them and talk to them though.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 06:12 PM
35

Also, most innocent people don't run from the cops, so chances are they are guilty if they are being looked for. This part of your statement is dangerously wrong. A lot of people run from a lot of things, for a lot of reasons that have nothing to do with guilt. Starting with the simple triggering of the flight or fight instinct we all have.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 03:56 PM
9

They are probably assuming you are too smart to go for it, being the top mind on reddit and all.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/21 01:24 PM
7

I have... in literally every case of female on male rape. 100% of them. Not even one exception that I have ever seen.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/21 09:53 PM
5

The more people who point it out just tell him there are more people with his crotch on their mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 06:20 PM
7

Equality has nothing to do with fairness, and it never has.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:32 PM
1

I got banned from Reddit on that account for 3 days because apparently she can kill men but I can't kill woman. Yes. And it will likely happen again every time you try something like this, because the mods have openly stated they support attitudes like that person's. It it known. Neither you, nor anyone else has anything to prove, so just don't engage those psychopaths.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 08:28 PM
1

Yeah, I was wondering how desperate a show has to be for ratings to run trash like this story.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 07:24 PM
9

Most don't. Everywhere I have lived no one even wants to acknowledge that anyone else on the public transportation exists, much less act like they should give up their seat. It's like men's restroom rules 2.0.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 06:25 PM
5

Makes you wonder how desperate they were for material that that is what they went with.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 06:24 PM
11

None of the factors either of you have mentioned matter though. It's a first come-first served service both paid for. The first one to buy the ticket, get on, and sit down is the only one with a right to that seat, and NO other factors are relevant. Not who works more, not who is stronger, not anyone's anatomy, not who needs special treatment. If that first person wants to give up their seat for someone else, it's a favor, a bonus, to the other person, they were never owed it. The only exception…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 06:20 PM
18

See so many Instagram posts Media articles that are just someone claiming something and everyone goes along with it
/r/MensRights30/04/21 04:20 PM
21

The fat phobia thing is 100% the idea that any feelings of shame can ONLY be inflicted from outside, not internally, so if you see someone doing better than you and feel shame about it it is because that person is MAKING you feel shame, and it is their fault. Since it's their fault, they have to fix themselves and stop shaming you. It's one of the single most toxic and narcissitic coping mechanisms I know of. They hate themselves but also can't handle the idea that they hate themselves, so they …
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:11 PM
4

She was basically saying, "Can you go into detail about this thing you don't want to talk about." Politics may be an overly broad term, but situations like this are really easy to handle. If you wonder if they think it's politics, don't bring it up with them. If that eliminates everything you care about as a topic of conversation, or your entire personality, then that person isn't for you and you should move on. I mean how hard is it to be like "They don't like this thing I'm obsessed with, mayb…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/21 02:19 PM
8

One week would cause a societal collapse I am not seeing a downside though.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:47 PM
6

Any government that enforces the pay-to-win structure of society is going to be fucked up. Our government is so much worse than that. Our government "freed the slaves" by moving slavery into the prison system and then expanded the prison system into one of the largest in the world. We are not merely a pay-to-win nation, we're a full blown slave state, run by people smart enough to realize if they hide the slaves in the prison system, the average citizen will tacitly approve with a shrugged off "…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 10:10 PM
6

And if there were no adult males the entire time would any of them spontaneously become less selfish as they age? My guess, without deliberate action to alter it, you'd be left with whatever the environmental factors are. Absent any of those pulling one way or another, you're left with random chance.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:54 PM
5

between this and the body stealing/rape in wonder woman, it's kind of clear that despite the metoo movement hollywood isn't even aware of how rape promoting it is.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 01:43 PM
4

Don't make a counter argument. A counterargument validates that their request is worth consideration. It isn't. Just say no.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:56 PM
3

Not "in a way" they literally said he was going to get his ass beat. That's directly threatening him. No "in a way" about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 02:26 PM
17

And Uber or it's insurance might require their drivers to press charges or something like that. (pure speculation, I don't actually know)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 02:19 PM
73

it was full iron with sharp ass 2 inch long blades. That was a garbage disposal, not a bey blade.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/21 08:09 PM
3

That's why I kept my statement neutral, in that it doesn't prove it one way or the other.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 04:36 PM
3

surely shows that the system isn't biased against men? No single case is actual proof that systemic bias does or doesn't exist. The system being biased means you have to aggregate all the cases and see if there is a biased pattern.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 03:08 PM
4

Seems like a solid strategy to weed out anyone who isn't super desperate. Maybe super desperate is her type???
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 03:26 PM
2

You shouldn't argue there. Don't wallow in the mud with swine. The only thing you'll get is dirty. Save your arguments till you can use them in a situation that actually matters. One where the potential actually exists for you to change minds or sway hearts, or affect policy. None of those things exist in that classroom.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 07:09 PM
32

you're basically saying you don't like them because of their identity. No, you are saying "I don't want to have a romantic relationship with you because of your personality." It doesn't preclude friendship or any other perfectly normal and healthy relationship outside of romance.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 07:47 PM
2

From what I hear, you get to experience female sexism in new and exciting ways, like the belief that gay bars exist solely to offer straight women places to hang out and hit on guys who aren't hitting on them.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 03:49 PM
3

But isn't the Scandinavian Peninsula just upland germanic?
/r/MensRights09/12/20 09:27 PM
17

That's in part because a significant block of this country (the US) believes that 70ish years ago the United States was perfect and flawless, had acquired all possible knowledge on all subjects, and could not possibly be improved in any way. And they will fight to their dying breath to prevent even the most infinitesimal changes from that 70 year old baseline.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 09:22 PM
14

...while enduring snide remarks about the man still being a child because they don't do things the same way she does.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:47 PM
1

I hope not!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 05:37 PM
3

I'm not a lawyer, and everything I posted was 100% guesswork, so I think I'm gonna go with "fuck if I know."
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 05:37 PM
50

Voice commands is likely how they used the electronics. Article cites a transaction, so they got the minor to do it by giving them enough money to convince them. Having holes for the minor to make use of is likely how they were serviced by the minor they hired.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 02:43 PM
23

It means they think the case Depp lost was the actual abuse trial and not just the defemation lawsuit.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:37 PM
2

Personally, I'm gonna take it a step further and boycott the Pirates of the Carribean franchise as well, until they return Depp to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/20 02:53 PM
1

It's got Jason Momoa in it, posing like a covergirl. Not seeing it will be a real sacrifice on many people's part.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/20 02:48 PM
3

and you’ll never be wrong! You can't stop me from that, no matter how hard you try!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/20 02:45 PM
14

#CannibalismSolvesEverything
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 09:36 PM
24

Timezones don't work though. They can't even fill out the application to get hired.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:54 PM
2

Personally, I think a DNA test should be a standard normal part of the birth process.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 03:11 PM
2

Every time it's mentioned they carefully explain that every man in the world has already personally refused to use it so there is no reason for them to make it, and it's men's fault.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:54 PM
2

We could make Amber Alert mean something else in slang. Who wants to go write some new Urban Dictionary entries?
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:52 PM
15

It also reflects the average men's natural protective instincts towards women.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:51 PM
54

Oh no, you got this one wrong. Didn't you know that according to radical feminists, men who want to see kids are pedophiles, even if it's just their own kid's lives they want to be involved in.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:38 PM
12

The problem with paying athletes is their skill matters a LOT less than the size of crowd they draw. The people doing the paying get their money from the crowd. The larger the crowd, the more money available to pay them. The smaller the crowd, the less they will make. They will have no leverage in getting better pay until they can fill stadiums/arenas.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:53 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 06:05 PM
2

It becomes toxic when it is taken too far, like to the point where it is causing larger issues. Like everything else, it CAN be taken too far. For example, my father refused to greive with the rest of the family when my brother died (several decades ago). He felt he needed to be "The Rock" for us to lean on. A week after the funeral he just started emotionally blowing up at us over literally nothing, because he just refused to let himself grieve when he needed too. He was literally poisoning his…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:06 PM
7

You asked an idiotic, trollish question that was along the lines of the same idiotic, trollish question that gets asked by other stupid people in nearly every online discussion about laws. It's not clever, and it was solved before the internet existed.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 08:46 PM
9

Are you actually unaware of how incredibly tangled and senseless marriage laws are currently? Congratulations, you just reinvented "wedding vows". Wedding vows aren't legally binding. What's "fucking insane" is an institution as crucial as marriage getting diluted, unruly and lawless. What? Simplifying it into contract law is "lawless?" Whatever your smoking, you should share with the rest of the class. We all "legally bind the entire country" to umpty rules. Called the constitution. If we can d…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 08:33 PM
12

So you think it's inhumane to come to an agreement with your prospective partner about the nature and rules for your relationship, write it down, sign it, and consider it legally binding between the two of you... ...but you don't think it's FUCKING INSANE to write down certain rules for a romantic partnership, then legally bind the entire country to following those specific rules, regardless of what they actually want out of that relationship. From my perspective, what you want is not only fucki…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 07:03 PM
33

Adultery should be a punishable offense. 100% of marriage law should be deleted and replaced with standard contract law. Then cases like this could simply consult the contract both parties signed to see if a legal offense was commited, and otherwise stay the hell out of the relationship. Adultery should be enough grounds for divorce. If it was handled as contract law, then any violation of the contract could be grounds for breech of contract penalties, which might include voiding the contract. D…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 04:25 PM
1

Tell her she will miss out on killing all the men if she cuts herself on all that edge first.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 07:08 PM
7

You keep phrasing thngs that implies this: The experience of powerlessness. Only comes from this: someone physically stronger And that's why everyone and their dog thinks you are fucking stupid... well, okay, not the ONLY reason, but certainly a big one. You are WRONG. There are no words in any language I know to describe how wrong you are. There are soooo many ways to be brought to a point of powerlessness it's insane to think that being physically stronger is the fucking deciding factor in it …
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:23 AM
5

You are really fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:10 AM
5

Are you under the impression that fear, shame, and trama only happen from penetration? If so, you are a fucking evil piece of shit.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:09 AM
2

He doesn't even know that men get erections when unconscious. I wouldn't count on him knowing anything that hasn't been on sesame street.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:08 AM
7

You can't be passed out and have a boner at the same time. Whoever taught you anatomy owes you a refund.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:06 AM
2

A woman cannot penetrate a man so you can't call it rape. You've never heard of a strap-on or a dildo have you?
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:05 AM
2

And no we don't need to change the definition because men can easily fight off women because he is stronger. Rape requires a power dynamic where the perpetrator is stronger and therefore use force to sexually penetrate. Men are stronger than women so woman can't physically force a man to do anything. You are really fucking stupid if you believe this tripe. The average man may be stronger than the average woman, but the average man and woman are hypotheticals. Real people have to deal with the wh…
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:02 AM
2

You literally just told people to break the law (if they're not in a 1-party consent state) when you said to start recording before they go into the office. I was under the impression that 1-party consent only prevented it from being usable in court. I don't think it makes it illegal to actually do the recording. I'm no lawyer though, I could definitely be wrong.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:37 PM
6

It's a radical feminist issue, because of even one cell of a man's flesh crosses the line of one bus seat into the adjoining one, you have literally raped every woman on every bus in the past present and future.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/20 06:49 PM
3

I agree. I despise my american justice system because it is more focused on punishing people than rehabilitating them. And there are worse things about it too, but if I get into those I'll be off on an unrelated rant.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 04:19 PM
-2

Eh, it might have been another country. It was an article I read, like 6 months ago. My memory is probably just mixing up the location with somewhere else.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 02:52 PM
5

While horrific, it doesn't surprise me that this is happening in the UK... if I remember right, the UK is the country trying to get rid of prison sentences for women entirely, even for criminal felonies.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 01:44 PM
1

You could also see his mouth moving, but because he wasn't yelling, couldn't hear what he was saying back to her, and that fits the description of someone who thinks they can get away with something. You know the sort, the ones who think they can put their hands on anyone else whenever they want, the kind that don't view other people as people, but objects. Spoiled people who've never had to face a consequence in their life. None of those types overtly display "the aggressor" signs, but I'd want…
/r/MensRights17/09/20 10:50 PM
-7

That fight started before the camera started rolling. The first line is "don't put your fucking hands on me." I don't have enough information to determine who is the real guilty one here. Assumptions about the reason for that first line and any provocation that came before are just that: assumptions, and judgement can't be based on that.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 07:20 PM
1

Also a vet, it's how I know about it. Saw it in every unit I was in. I'm not saying it happened in ALL units, only that it happens. And often enough to be worrisome.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 11:01 PM
1

Have you ever heard of tire burning events in the military? It's when a military unit has money left over in their budget at the end of the fiscal year, and don't want their budget reduced the next year, so they waste it on crap they don't need in order to have the books show that it was used. Almost every military unit I know about has them, whether actual tires are involved or not. If you want to reduce military spending, that's where I'd start. Both reducing those individual unit budgets AND …
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:42 PM
3

They claim to be for mens rights too, but really only use that claim to try to gatekeep equal rights in general.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:25 PM
1

Everything you have said indicates you aren't capable of recognizing that your own personal experience isn't necessarily representative of all of humanity's. That by itself indicates that you aren't even capable of understanding why you are wrong, much less how wrong you are. Come back here when you've experienced enough of the world that your views aren't fucking infantile any more.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 11:19 PM
1

False equivalency. Fucking asshats like you that equate "I have a problem, can we work on fixing it" with "OmG Im OpReSsED" are the source of fucking problems like this. Feel free to go fuck yourself in whatever sub you wander off into.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:25 PM
9

I know plenty of feminists who hate the whole idea that men have to be strong and emotionless. That’s why you hear people talking about “toxic masculinity”. It’s a big point of feminism, to address the toxic divides between the sexes that result in damaging effects on both sides. 100% of the female feminists I know who verbally espouse this attitude will also discard a crying man like a plagued, soiled blanket in utter disgust and tell them to be a real man. Claiming it's only men that espouse t…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:31 PM
2

How the living fuck do you conflate "having an erection" with "giving consent."
/r/MensRights28/08/20 07:32 PM
9

I'd check other sources before spreading that number. Or anything else from NZ.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 02:54 PM
9

My best guess (and it's only a guess) is that some people want to blame an easier target than a government agency so they can feel like they can do something about it.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 06:01 PM
4

It just seems heartless and inhumane to take away a child from someone who so badly wants one I disagree wholeheartedly. The inhumane thing would be for someone who wants a child to try to have one under the worst conditions they could, with someone who doesn't want the same thing. THAT would be inhumane. Sure, it might be a sad situation, and someone might be suffering no matter what is decided, but the man in that situation would be suffering far, far, FAR less than the woman forced to continu…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 01:53 PM
1

I don't understand why wage garnishment isn't just the default. If the court orders payment be made, then the court should collect and deliver that payment rather than just hoping the people do it just because they were told.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:43 PM
0

They are if they don't want to be sued for libel.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 04:00 PM
20

When the news reports it, the are required to report it using the proper legal definitions, which in the US, federally IIRC is the penetration with any body part or object. Only the person doing the penetration can be called the rapist. So they HAVE to report it as sexual assault, because the person being forced to penetrate is the victim. The woman though, she is under no such obligation and can freely use the common definition of rape, she's just such a degenerate piece of shit she's okay with…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 01:29 PM
-11

She might be a hateful piece of trash, but I'll be honest, I don't give a flying fuck what the reason is, if any human being grabs me to try to force me to argue with them when I am walking away, I will instantly be violent until I can again continue trying to walk away. I can not blame any human being for doing the same. Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force anyone to listen to you. But yeah, one kick to the gonads rupturing both testicles sounds fake as fuck.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 02:09 PM
1

Personally, I think whatever people do on both mothers day and fathers day is between you and your parents or you and your kids, and the entire rest of the universe can fuck right on off with their opinions about it, no matter what those opinions are. If you aren't my kid or my spouse, the heat-death of the universe will arrive before you get a say in what I do or how I celebrate those holidays.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/20 06:12 PM
19

I'm the dick. I don't ever expect presents from anyone (and I don't want them). I'm not bringing presents to any events. I don't care if blank is expensive, it was your choice to make. This is honestly the way I feel about gifts. When I give a gift it's because wanted you to have something. I am owed nothing for it. When you give me a gift, I regard it the same way. I owe you nothing for it. Gifts are not exchanges of obligation.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 03:42 PM
12

Don't forget your boxers on the way out.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:54 PM
9

He's talking about someone who just told him he had no value as a human being because he wasn't having kids. That person kinda deserves the hate.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 07:22 PM
3

It's a common trend among people who think you exist to serve their needs. You can see the same overall attitude from the parents of those guys, who had kids as a retirement plan and are now faced with the idea that those kids won't be their personal servants in their old age.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 07:21 PM
21

Unfortunately, "male gets punished harshly for crime against female" is also a more popular headline than "female gets punished for crime against male."
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:50 PM
3

Yeah but they also have no problem hiring them back once the shit's blown over. See James Gunn for example.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 10:12 PM
2

a good source for keeping abreast of Porn World. I see what you did there! Where can I find a news source for porn drama that includes as many puns as possible?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 10:04 PM
11

They forgot to mention the self diagnosed PTSD the conversation caused.
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 04:48 PM
2

If you ask some parts of the military, the CD was only recently invented in the last 5 years to replace 5 3/4" floppy lol.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:33 PM
1

Tactics don't have gender, and neither does victory or defeat. To believe otherwise is to cripple yourself before the fight even begins.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:28 PM
1

They would, but only after the nearest manager explained it to them 5-6 times.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:25 PM
3

The power isn't turned off at the end of the phone call, it's turned off after a grace period to inform the current residents that it will be and that they need to straighten it out if they want to still have power. The 2 yr. old likely never went without power.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:24 PM
1

I agree with your point, mine was merely that the man wasn't 100% without recourse, just like 99% lol.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 04:19 PM
1

From my memory it either had to have the consent of the mother, or be court ordered.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:58 PM
2

Yes. I have seen rants about it.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:45 PM
2

California isn't a real place it's a made up place we tell jokes about when we get tired of making fun of Florida.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 10:42 PM
3

It's also defined as an act committed by a penis No it isn't, not in the USA anyway. ANY penetration by a body part or an object can be rape it the person penetrated was unwilling. The person penetrating is the only one who can be defined, legally as raping. More often than not the sexual assault a woman commits is to get herself penetrated by an unwilling (or underage) victim. That is why the woman isn't accused of rape. The word penis doesn't even appear in the legal definitions of the word ra…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:56 PM
12

This is called fishing for justification for hatred. Almost any time you have someone blaming literally everything on the group they don't like, it's irrational hatred.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 01:59 PM
1

finance is a huge factor in why 50% of marriages fail. To add to this point, it really doesn't matter a whole lot what your arrangement is for finances, as long as all parties are satisfied and happy with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 02:08 PM
2

Fathers day is between you and your father. Mothers day is between you and your mother. Whoever they maybe, guy/gal, same person or multiple... and anyone who isn't you or your father/mother can fuck right on off if they think they have a say in it.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:59 PM
2

Except that we live in a day and age when the law DOESN'T deal with the rich and famous appropriately unless faced with enormous public pressure.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:27 AM
2

So you are saying we should let criminals get away with their crimes, because it seems more manly to do so? That's stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:36 PM
2

"Instructions unclear..." Depp probably
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:29 PM
8

People can commit all kinds of evil if they can justify it to themselves. That's 100% the purpose of that kind of thinking, that men can't be abused, because they want to justify the abuse they already do, or plan to do.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:32 PM
3

And there it is, the full view of your insanity.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:38 PM
7

Thank you for repeating exactly what I am accusing you of to make your argument. It's nice to have such a prime example.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:31 PM
8

You said: The last line claims that there is nothing advantageous about skin color or sex The post actually said: Privilege comes from money and connections, not from skin colour or the shape of your genitals. Those are drastically different statements. If you are going to argue against the post, at least argue with what it actually said. Better yet, don't remove the context of the previous 13 paragraphs and try to argue against it as if it were in a void. At best it's guilty of not being techni…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:02 PM
9

The last line claims that there is nothing advantageous about skin color or sex No it doesn't. Your misquote has drastically different meaning that what the post actually says. If you have to add a chain of inferences between the actual quote and your misquote to connect them, then it's 100% NOT what was said.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 11:45 AM
3

As far as I can tell, anyone who legitimately wants equal rights is welcome here. There are even some women who have joined this sub.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:40 PM
1

I have spoken.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 07:06 PM
2

and the ones that don’t probably aren’t my style. Pretty much this. They are just helping me weed them out of any potential relationship. Bullet dodging.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:10 PM
2

Incels have their own special attitude where they think women owe them sex, and that not being given the sex they feel they are owed victimizes them.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:05 PM
0

I have two hands, I'll take my toys go full single player mode.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:02 PM
3

It's almost like the goal isn't really to find any random wet and warm vagina, but to find a person whose wants and desires sync with yours, who is sexually compatible with you, and doesn't want to destroy your life.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:57 PM
3

You should repost this in r/legaladvice You should get a lawyer. No one in JAG is on your side. They are there to benefit the military, not to serve justice or anything like that. Get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:12 PM
5

What we need is a special satellite system that detects people trying to reboot something that isn't bad, and dropping a 1 ton tungsten rod on them from orbit.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/20 10:54 PM
12

I kinda want to see martha stewart have henry cavil and ben affleck as guests, and the entire time they are all just meming about that inane plot.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/20 10:50 PM
2

No one mentioned it because it was released only on the DC streaming service. Even DC fans will tell you that service is only worth paying for if you are into comic books (not comic book movies or shows) since you get all the comic books with it too. Soon as they decided that, no one was going to watch it. You can also purchase the season on amazon for $20, but since you can't watch the show to see if you even like it, who's gonna throw $20 at it?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/20 10:47 PM
1

Because they aren't good enough to build something up, leaving them only the option of tearing down.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/20 10:42 PM
13

The whole of the #Metoo movement in my opinion is based on hypocrisy. Do you mean how it started with a large group of people who consciously choose to make a sexual transaction to advance their career. Or how no one openly admitted to it for decades because prostitution isn't legal?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 05:20 PM
1

We get totally judged if we're not having sex. You can get snide comments like "incel" or "can't get any." The truth is, no one's sex life is anyone else's business, and that's true whether someone is having sex with 200 different people a year or if they're not having any sex. I personally would not want to have sex with hundreds of different women, even if instincts tell you to do that. I would find that kind of behavior too risky. I'm not trying to tell others what to do, btw. I'm only saying…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 05:41 PM
1

The ones not posting absolutely are part of MGTOW. Only if they say they are. You don't get to assign membership any more than the feminist movement gets to assign membership to anyone fighting for any civil rights (they tried that shit). If they say they are a member of MGTOW, then sure. I'm also not sure where you saw that "she's a whore for no banging me" post. I haven't been to the MGTOW subreddit, but on other sites. If you are solely speaking of the subreddit that all I can say is experien…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 05:18 PM
1

If that's what I actually saw going on in those groups, they'd have my support 100%. And when those ARE the posts I see, I do support it. It's not what I see most of the time. Most of the time what I see is "I tried to get laid and she turned me down so here are 101 reasons she's a whore, and wrong for not giving me sex." And that deserves no support, much like those shaming men for sharing their pain deserve no support. And I'd argue that the ones not participating, aren't part of the group.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:48 AM
1

The difference is in what they are claiming compared to their behavior. Also, please bear in mind, I am speaking in generalities, with all the flaws that has, I'm just assuming we both understand there are and always will be exceptions. MGTOW is claiming to be going their own way rather than focusing on creating a romantic relationship. But then they spend all their time hyper focused on those they want relationships with, but can't have, rather than figuring out how to move on on their own. The…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:40 AM
0

That's a fair argument, and when they first started as a group I wouldn't have disagreed with it. But in the last year or so my own experience has been that too many of them share too many views with incels for me to consider it to still be true. It's a good idea in concept, but like most things, gets corrupted. None of them I've had a conversation with recently has had any resemblance to having gone their own way and instead just parrots anti-woman dogma. But admittedly, my experience is of cou…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:19 AM
-1

If they were actually going their own way, they wouldn't be so focused on why they don't have a relationship. They wouldn't need a support group to complain to either. They'd just go their own way and not worry about it.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:40 PM
-7

No, MGTOW is not playing at all, but joining a group focused solely on every aspect of why it's someone else's fault as to why you don't play.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 10:29 PM
1

My phone does this when my headphones aren't plugged in all the way. It's super embarrassing to me the few times it's happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/19 03:54 AM
16

"Fun" fact: The legal definition of rape involves penetrating the other person. This falsely leads people to equate it only with men because dicks get stuck in things. But if the female uses a toy in any orifice of the male, it meets the legal definition of rape. Technically, so does sticking her tongue down his throat. It more often does apply to men solely because men are more often the ones doing the penetrating, even when the male is being forced. This leads newspapers to the awkward positio…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 07:03 PM
2

there is too much wooshing to tell honestly.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 06:56 PM
14

Having worked in schools, I can say that every single adult that works in a school is in a position of authority over kids in that school.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 06:53 PM
11

The woman has a point when you consider how often it's men buying both the diamonds and the dogs, but only keeping one of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/19 03:13 PM
2

As a guy, I think the situation is fucked up enough that I wonder why you don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/19 12:06 AM
6

"You've got to be kidding me." "I am."
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/19 08:29 PM
8

What if the home was already a void before it was shattered.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/19 08:28 PM
2

Obviously, but if I walk up to someone and assault them, and they kill me for it, I'll still be the dumbass that's dead cause I couldn't think critically for a tiny second that "hey, maybe I shouldn't be attacking someone." You don't have much control over what the person you attack does back to you, so if you don't want the worst possible result, don't fucking attack someone.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:27 PM
4

It probably would be, but if I walked up to someone and slapped them, and they pulled out a gun and shot me, I'd be hard pressed not to feel pretty stupid for starting it in the first fucking place. I have no control over the response of someone I attack, and neither does anyone else. If they kill you for attacking them, you deserved it FOR ATTACKING THEM. You don't want to be killed by some crazy person you provoke like a dumbass, don't attack people.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:25 PM
2

Sure the law does, but I have no control over what someone I attack does back to me, and neither does the law. If I walked up to someone and slapped them and they pulled out a gun and shot me, i'd be pretty hard pressed not to feel fucking stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 07:22 PM
43

We are all entitled to our opinions, both you and me. Mine is you should never start a fight you aren't willing to die in.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 04:51 PM
16

Congratulations on providing the internet with sure evidence that you are a dumb fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 04:22 PM
165

Your right to defend yourself is not dependent on the size of your attacker/abuser relative to you. Having bigger muscles doesn't remove your right to self defense. Having a larger body doesn't remove your right to self defense. You take the first swing at someone, you deserve everything that follows, no matter what it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 03:47 PM
17

That's better denial than OP's post.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 04:12 AM
1

Unfortunately for non-native speakers, mixing words like these up on purpose is a game a lot of native English speakers play. "Word games" we call it. You can see examples of it throughout the comments section lol. The word games are why I love the english language. They get even better when you delve into words that are spelled the same but have different meanings. They form the basis of "dad jokes." You can google the term "Dad Joke" to get tons of examples.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 05:50 PM
2

'Ware where the wear wares were sold.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 04:47 PM
11

Helpful guide: Were: past tense "Bob and Nancy were at the store." Where: location "Where are Bob and Nancy?" Wear: what you do with clothes "What did Bob and Nancy wear to the store?" Wear: entropic "Running to all the stores wears Bob and Nancy down." See also the phrase "wear and tear" referring to damage from repeated use. Ware: the products in a store "What wares were sold at the store Bob and Nancy went to?" 'ware: shortened form of 'beware' " 'ware Bob and Nancy, they are werewolves."
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 03:38 PM
1

It's almost like those execs didn't have perfect pitches.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:43 PM
1

In her case, that isn't actually acting.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:41 PM
1

Historically some of the biggest flops in movie history has been every single stand alone Hulk movie, because as a stand alone character the Hulk is about as 1 dimensional as it gets. I like the way the cartoon movies do it. It's always hulk+<insert other hero> and what ends up happening is you get to see hulk and that hero face off, badguys interfere, plot happens between <insert other hero> and badguys, while hulk is the environment they have to work around while they deal with the plot. It wo…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:39 PM
1

Honestly, who couldn't see "box office bomb" coming? Elizabeth Banks
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:32 PM
3

If she's the saving grace of the movie, that says a lot about the movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:31 PM
2

How much do female empowerment movies draw from an expected female audience. Wouldn't that be the target audience? When they are ACTUAL female empowerment movies, they do just fine. When they are "we can only do something men have already done, doing nothing more than replacing male actors with female ones, and replacing the script with stereotype-filled crap." it does terrible, just like ghostbusters and oceans 8.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:25 PM
1

Holy fuck that needs to happen stat!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:05 PM
1

I've seen a couple previews of it, but thought it was coming out next year some time.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 04:04 PM
1

The movie didn't spend it's whole budget trying to be better than men, it spent it on making a fun, campy movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 03:54 PM
1

Personally I really enjoyed Terminator Dark Fate. Thought it was the best terminator movie made since T2. But then, it was about kicking ass and killer robots not some random nobody's personal hit squad of talentless posers who are especially feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 03:45 PM
26

This: Same shit happened with the BBC. Was a statement providing relevant information for the scentence that followed it. Not a complaint. This: Then they actually went and gave more men than women raises to even it out. Was praising a group for self correcting when they were provided data that they were doing something wrong. Also not a complaint. This: You're literally complaining Is factually incorrect. This: what most companies do to women Is debatable, and mostly debunked. This: without add…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/19 03:54 PM
12

Specifically she's talking as if same sex parents could only possibly be mothers and not fathers.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 03:22 PM
24

On the other hand, the makers of the laws should be the last human beings in existence that laws aren't applied to mercilessly.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:38 PM
10

I don't give up my seat. I don't expect anyone else to give up theirs. No one deserves it. Not me, not you, not anyone else. I will, however, move my bag off the seat next to me if the bus fills up. Before the bus fills up you can all fuck off to some other seat though.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/19 07:05 AM
2

I suppose to make it fair a guy's dick should get callouses for every person he's slept with too, just so they can tell who's been sticking it in every hole they see.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/19 09:17 PM
2

The wage gap has long since been proven to be about 99.999% their choice. The arguments I see still supporting it argue that society should be supporting an increased standard of living for those raising children, since children are the future.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:29 PM
2

It's all right to hit anyone who hits you. Self defense is one of those inalienable rights. I question the motives of anyone trying to tell me I can't fight back against someone.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 09:56 PM
7

A lot of subs make it against the rules to question anyone's post, and any post that does gets removed.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:54 PM
24

More likely they are r/thathappened material.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:49 PM
6

It wasn't legal, it was just successful. The guy tried to sue the company who was holding the sperm and failed, because they were never informed that they weren't married any more, and spouses have a lot of rights to speak for each other. The guy never did go after the woman (that I heard about anyway). Even if he did succeed at suing the woman, he'd still have to pay to support the child, because the state will never force an abortion. Maybe, just maybe, he'd be able to get the woman thrown in …
/r/MensRights14/06/19 10:05 PM
48

Thanks!
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:19 PM
165

Link to actual article?
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:04 PM
4

The word you're looking for is rape. In common parlance, yes. Legally speaking though, if she didn't penetrate them with a body part or an object, she didn't legally rape them. Legally speaking it may not have been rape... legally. Which is still fucked up.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 10:30 PM
7

It's difficult when you want to end someone else's oppression, but only so you can oppress people yourself.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 12:51 AM
2

So is she being charged with murder?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 01:16 AM
2

What you seem to have missed was that I asked a question. No one was fooled by you putting a question mark at the end of your sentence. Yes, he is advocating for women abandoning their newborn babies no questions asked at the nearest fire station or hospital. That's a complete and total abdication of all parental responsibility. No he didn't. You inferred that that is what he was advocating without him every having said any of that. So after she drops off the newborn at the hospital, what respon…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 06:53 PM
4

So, out of curiosity, as soon as they go forward with the "without his consent" part, what's stopping him from simply claiming full custody of the child, using the adoption attempt as evidence that she plainly doesn't even want the child? I'm not any kind of lawyer or anything, but it'd make sense to me if a judge put a halt on the adoption process until custody was decided in that sort of situation.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:57 PM
7

When your argument is based 100% on assumptions and inferences about what someone else said, your argument is usually full of shit. The guy never said the mother should have no responsibility. What he did say doesn't require the mother no longer have responsibility. In fact, others even linked a story where a father reclaimed his child, and then went after and won child support from the mother.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:46 PM
3

Also true. And if you are going to also be polite, you will always make sure to skip only a single space in order to maximize the number of people who can fit without having to fill in the spaces.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/19 07:56 PM
36

Yeah, public transit gold standard is actually the same standard of conduct used in the mens public restrooms: No eye contact No unnecessary conversation No asking anyone for favors Anyone breaking any of those rules is a savage or a deviant.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/19 03:56 PM
19

hashtag CartmanDoesJenniferLopezBetterThanJenniferLopezDoes
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:29 PM
6

Ah I missed that, that makes more sense. Thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:36 PM
-6

Note the screen capture than doesn't include her reply. We don't have any idea if she was just fine with it. We shouldn't make assumptions about women any more than we want them to make assumptions about us.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:51 PM
-17

How is this a mens rights issue? Who in a relationship pays for meals is no more a "rights" issue than whether or not you negotiate for better pay. You decide it between the two of you and be done with it (or each other if necessary).
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:48 PM
2

Creed / Nickleback compilation cd. And they say you can't get cancer from listening to CDs.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 04:22 PM
1

I was looking at number of comments of each type, not the upvotes... but I suppose you make a good point.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 08:18 PM
5

Yeah I feel like this sub only reads the headlines and runs with it. An hour after you wrote this, I'd say it's dead even between the number of people who just read the headline, and the number of people who read the article and are telling the OP their title is wrong.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:15 PM
5

You just described most of hollywood though.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:56 PM
1

Haha well for the sake of this discussion the post we are both talking about says 43% are raised by single moms. Okay, that's a fair call-out. I would be interested in seeing the real statistics. My comment wasn't meant to say you are wrong, just to point out that both side should be providing sources if it's gonna be a serious discussion. The district I live in is different than yours. Women almost auto-win custody battles here, unless the guy can prove the woman is unfit to be a mother entirel…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:43 PM
5

I won't buy the most cases argument without a citation. You declared that absentee fathers are the problem. Please cite your source that absentee fathers are the issue over fathers that aren't allowed to be part of their kids lives.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:15 PM
20

Are you saying that single mothers are single mothers because the fathers choose not to be there? While that may be true for some, it's hardly universally true. Far more often the mother chooses how much access the father has to the child at all if they aren't married, so no matter how much the father wants to be there, it's not really his choice unless the mother allows it to be his choice.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:10 PM
3

u sack of shit WTF is wrong with you assuming gender like that you goddamned bigot?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 03:43 PM
27

Though this feels like you want to go back to the time where females didn’t even get to vote? Does that mean that the original, unaltered quotes that this reversed the genders of were promoting moving onto a future where men can't vote and don't have rights? Because this post was just pointing out the insanity of those original quotes by reversing the genders.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:00 PM
0

Oh I am not implying everyone in that sub is incel, just that more incels joine dthat sub to voice their insanity than they did anywhere else I know about.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:15 PM
1

Some people just don't understand that attacking what you don't like can't actually fix it in any good way.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:30 PM
0

It can be really seductive to talk about the bad things feminists have done in the world, but as you say, it IS toxic and unproductive. It also perpetuates the cycle of hate. What we need to do is end that cycle, not just keep the wheel turning. The ONLY way to do that is to not allow the hate to flow back and forth. Since we have no ability to stop hate from flowing from any other group, we need to stop it from coming from ourselves. One of my personal heroes is a black guy who turned a few hun…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:15 PM
10

r/MGTOW is currently the largest incel refugee camp I know about. Some of them get in here too, but I've seen this sub push back against incel comments quite a bit.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:02 PM
13

Especially not literally everyone ever. FTFY
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:53 PM
4

So does your internet service provider.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:12 PM
80

In my office the women get mad that we turn the heater on in the winter, because then they can't wear their cute winter sweaters.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 05:54 PM
9

People vilify the word discrimination, but in reality, picking a new hire is 100% discrimination. You have to weed out all the people you don't think are good enough to do the job you want. Then you have to find a reason to pick one person over everyone who can do that job. It may not be gender based discrimination, or race based, but it is ALL discrimination. Turns out Amazon has a lot of jobs that take physical labor. Turns out statistically and averagely, men are more likely to do well at phy…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 02:31 PM
2

He probably would... but that doesn't make your opinion on how it should be into actual military doctrine. I was army, and we were taught we were infantry and our MoS, and I know marines are taught similarly.... but I highly doubt the navy or air force follows that doctrine, not having any infantry MoSs in their branch to begin with. My dad was air force, and I know for sure that while he was still in, they certainly didn't follow that idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 02:24 PM
5

A lot of amazon jobs are physical rather than technical. It may have simply been sorting for physical suitability for hard labor, rather than technical expertise. Though I haven't actually looked at the real data, that's just my conjecture on what might cause it to do this and still make sense somehow. Now, obviously there are women who can handle hard labor just fine, but an AI is gonna look at statistics and averages and determine what is most likely to be beneficial to it's goals. I wonder if…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 02:19 PM
7

Curious if it had any similar biases against asshole misogynists as it did against asshole misandrists. That probably depends on whether or not misandry or misogyny affected the completion of tasks it was recruiting for. It likely didn't take human feelings into account much at all would be my guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 02:13 PM
3

Even lizard people understand that being cute doesn't make up for lacking in every other department. The guy can get "cute" from a poster. Be more than a poster.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/18 02:49 PM
2

I just don't understand the forgiveness part. Which is perfectly all right. I am not the type of person who will tell you you have to forgive everyone. The standards of behavior I believe in, I also only believe apply to myself. I'll never judge anyone else for not following my own code of ethics, because mine is tailored specifically to help ME get through life, not anyone else. I can try to explain, and help you understand my perspective, even if you don't agree with it, and that's what I'll t…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:53 PM
2

You are mistaking forgiveness of allowing them to continue. You can still flip the switch on the electric chair and still release your anger and resentment. No one is using the term in a legal sense here. It's not absolving them of their wrong doing. They must still face the consequences. All it is is not holding on to the hatred of them. Someone comes in and rapes my family to death, I kill them, then I forgive them, releasing the hatred and anger. I then allow myself to heal mentally and emoti…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:07 PM
9

I agree with you on all points. Including that it would likely only be legal in single party consent states. My personal opinion is that it shouldn't be considered private once you've involved others, and especially if you are a threat to the people you shared it with. I dislike two party consent laws. But I am fully aware my personal opinion has nothing to do with the legal system. Especially this: If men are cornered into verifying their every conversation, men have already lost basic human pr…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:40 PM
23

Sounded like he was talking about a voluntary thing, not a mandatory thing. It's not a violation if you are doing it by your own choice.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:37 PM
22

I don't think anyone rational will side with her after she falsely accusated men. Yeah, but it's the irrational people that you should be afraid of finding you.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:10 PM
3

Because politicians making laws on the matter want to look good in the public eye, not actually fix problems. Their first and only priority is their appearance. You think SJWs are virtue signaling, but they have nothing on a politician trying to get or keep office. They largely do not value human life, much less care about human suffering. They mostly don't care even slightly about making the world a better place. They care about their own self interest and nothing else.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:12 PM
14

Because if it's using my DNA, and the law is gonna force me to pay for it, I'd rather give it the benefit of being raised by me rather than the narcissistic, fraudulent, criminal who faked my signature to impregnate herself with my sperm. I may not be the best person to raise it, but I am several magnitudes better than an identity thieving piece of shit like the kid's mom.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:15 AM
1

Change my mind Only switches available are duck or frog. Which would you prefer?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:58 PM
5

It pisses me off every time I hear "teach women to defend themselves" passed of as victim shaming. Like who the fuck do you think you are that you think you shouldn't learn to defend yourself?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:56 PM
2

Not just innocent men going to jail, but she's also willing to sacrifice by allowing female on male rape.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:51 PM
183

I'd want 100% custody after the fraud trial and her jail time.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:48 PM
4

Yeah... but the adoptive parents can still come after the father and make him pay child support.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:27 PM
3

Seeing the pussypass get denied is so satisfying because it doesn't get denied nearly as often as it should. People use the pussypass because it gets them what they want more often than not, in the real world.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 09:46 PM
3

There is, it's called condescension. Unfortunately, that word isn't good enough, because it doesn't condescend to people feminists don't like.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:03 AM
3

Make sure you call yourself in to talk to HR about this issue!
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:59 AM
58

She's also bitching about having to pick up slack because a new parent takes time off. As if it wasn't women taking that time off for their kids 9 out of 10 times, and men picking up the slack. But as soon as a woman is affected by it, it's a horrible affront to femininity.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:47 PM
5

I thought the "even more significant" part was: "more significant than the contempt of court orders"? Because you are absolutely correct that moving isn't nearly as significant as losing a parent.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:59 PM
12

the Taming of the shrew is a fiercely feminist show It's one of shakespears most misogynistic stories. How is it a fiercely feminist show?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:14 PM
4

California and New York think you are hilarious.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:52 PM
12

The way I hear it, a lot of prenups get tossed out by the judge. I'm no expert though. I think the point is, rich guys can get some with out having to commit to marriage. There is no upside to marriage for many of them, it's all either breaking even or facing loss. And the social benefits of gaining societal approval for being a married guy raising a family has steadily lost it's value over the years.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:47 PM
11

Women are often raised on the phrase "If you can't handle me at my worse..."
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:44 PM
3

Ideally, they live in a drama-free bliss inherent in not being interested in participating in a relationship any more. In practice though, many (not all, just a lot) start sounding like incels, and it becomes obvious that the going their own way was not voluntary, and it's really because they can't get laid.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:42 PM
13

Because it's a circus, and all a circus needs is for an audience to have suspension of disbelief... and most of the public still believes they are mostly accurate.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:21 PM
10

Their computers must be really special.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:51 PM
1

Legally, a man cannot be raped by a woman, unless she sodomized him. The moment you added the "unless" clause you literally stated how your previous statement was wrong. Legally, a man can be raped by a woman, however one thing that should be rape, envelopment, isn't considered rape as it should be. Instead that's sexual assault. One thing that should be rape not being included in the definition does not mean all forms of a woman raping a man no longer exist.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:16 PM
1

I think you might have missed the concern with specifically targetting women for what I feel is a generally good idea. I think you may have missed that everything I have said in this thread was to point out that people saying the legal definition of rape excluded women were wrong about that, and none of my comments had anything to do with the overall topic of the OP: the sex offender registry. Maybe you are responding to the wrong person, or maybe you are blatantly ignoring the quotes in my post…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:15 PM
1

What in that would make you think gay men didn't count? Is it: penetration, no matter how slight of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person without the consent of the victim. There is literally nothing in that sentence that would even suggest excluding gay people, men, women or any other kind of person. Lets break it down even more: It's rape if the vagina or anus is penetrated by any body part or any object without consent of the vic…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 03:27 AM
1

Technically, using specific wording of the law which has not been changed, men cannot be raped by women. You are wrong about this in many places in the US. The current legal definition of rape is "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." Sources: https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:27 PM
2

That depends heavily on your locale.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:23 PM
7

A clandestine nature vs an open admission to bigotry? That's my best guess.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:59 PM
84

Personally, I've been wondering how many parallels could be drawn between these "diversity bureaucrats" and the old USSR's political officers, the Commissars.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:19 PM
36

Also, ""he's completely monogamous" and "Completely fair open relationship"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/18 05:34 PM
95

Yeah, when she talked about how he is totally monogamous, but it would be a completely fair open relationship, my bullshit meter went off the scale.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/18 05:32 PM
3

My understanding is that no, it wouldn't be rape... it could be sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:19 PM
3

He clearly said in his first post that she was guilty of the criminal battery portion and deserves to be in jail. The Judge said she was guilty of more. If some redditor who knows absolutely no real details of the case disagrees with the Judge who presided over the trial, it's gonna be hard to convince me that the random redditor is anything but retarded. Especially when there are reasons people can think of off the top of their heads as to why the guy may have not just kicked her ass out the do…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 11:50 PM
4

The Judge in an actual court of law said she was guilty. Stands to reason there was actual legal reason for it. I gave a plausible explanation for it. Far, far more plausible than, "Lol Judge, lawyers, and court are stupid, this guy is at fault for the thing the lady was found guilty of!" Maybe when you are examining arguments for "did someone make shit up" you should start with your own arguments.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 08:54 PM
10

"I will stab you even more if you get in that bed, wear un-approved clothes, or change your password. I will fake injuries and call the police to report you abusing me if you ever try to leave." Yeah, couldn't be anything but his fault. Totally. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 07:05 PM
10

At which point you can escalate it outside the company. If HR is contributing the workplace harassment, then HR is just as sue-able as the co-worker yelling "fuck white males."
/r/MensRights16/04/18 04:56 PM
2

In the US being provoked can lessen sentences for things. I'm to lazy to google actual cases for examples though.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 03:14 PM
2

I agree with you completely... but personally, I have been driven to a point of anger and rage that I was literally not in my right mind. I don't think the guy is in the right for continuing, but I do understand why he might have gone there, even if it was wrong to do so. Of course if he was in his right mind, and he was just doing it to satisfy himself, then he's a fucked up person.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 03:09 PM
1

That is what it is supposed to mean, but people commonly use it the wrong way. They also commonly find justifications to claim anything that isn't feminine is toxic masculinity. If it wasn't used as a buzzword that they consider an adequate counter argument by itself, like calling someone an nazi, or racist, then it would be fine, but is basically in the same boat as things like sexist, racist, nazi, etc. It's got the same problem "institutional racism" has.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 07:19 PM
2

Thanks, I'll check that out. Personally, I agree that most of the human race could benefit from learning how to utilize their minds better instead of leaving people to figure it out for themselves. We don't do that with reading or math, and critical thinking seems even more important. I wouldn't say I'm cured of depression because of therapy, but I have the tools to monitor myself, manage it, and prevent the symptoms. From what I understand there is no cure, just vigilance. Which is another way …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:12 PM
2

I'd be interested in reading up on cognitive behavior therapy, if you have any suggested reading. I am always interested in ways to futz with one's mind lol.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:59 PM
2

It's worth mentioning that there's likely a significant genetic component to depression I've been watching for them my whole life just in case. There have been periods of sadness and apathy, but when I can sleep it off I don't think I can call it depression. If it was it was passing (so far). My biggest problem is being a stress eater and hating exercise lol. My Dad responds well to St. Johns Wort, and for him it really is like a vitamin. There was a period for a few years where he took it relig…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:41 PM
2

They're not really my statistics, they're data collected from governmental agencies. Understood, my wording was perhaps poor for implying that. I only used "your" because you presented them, I didn't mean to imply you were responsible for them. I'm sorry about your father. I hope he was able to find relief and good mental health. No one deserves to feel suicidally depressed, let alone to go undiagnosed. He has gotten a lot of help, but he swings back and forth into depressed and normal. He's one…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:05 PM
1

Like all statistics, you use the ones that get people to your side. One supports them, the other doesn't. Why is it even a question why they insist on using the one that supports them?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:58 PM
1

As long as we can separate it from human trafficking.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:55 PM
3

Psychological disorders are 20-40% higher in women, especially anxiety, depression, and insomnia. I know it is anecdotal, but my dad went more than 20 years with undiagnosed depression, and when he finally went to the doctor for it, they diagnosed him as very far past suicidal depressed. While it is anecdotal, that is the basis of my belief that men are far, far, far less likely to actually get their mental disorders treated or even diagnosed. Which if true, would throw one of your statistics of…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:53 PM
2

It's a phenomenon some refer to as the pussypass. You can see people trying to use it, often on video, in r/pussypassdenied. It's a thing though, because it works often enough to be worth trying. You know all the stereotypes involved in the women gets pulled over for speeding jokes? They are rife in sitcoms for the last twenty years, about batting your eyes, showing some cleavage, and getting a warning. Yeah those didn't become stereotypes because they weren't a thing. Someone linked to the rese…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:47 PM
8

Ever notice that most women want you to listen to their emotions, but the only emotions they want to hear about from you are the ones you feel about them?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:36 PM
3

Displaying the need to declare things like that kind of just proves to the internet that you are definitely not part of the population that contributes to the gene pool.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:32 PM
8

My college class in feminism literally covered all the issues in this thread as part of feminist theory. There isn't a gap in the statistics and how feminism is actually taught, just a gap in how people think feminism works after getting in internet arguments with teenagers instead of learning from college professors. In the real world, feminism supporting men has been debunked, and the only people who still believe that rhetoric are feminists. In reality, the idea that feminism covers mens righ…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:23 PM
7

Didn't you get the memo: They are owed princesshood by virtue of their very existence.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:14 PM
1

Yeah, “patriarchy” is for the intellectually lazy... True of all buzzwords.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:13 PM
3

but it's condescending for you to reduce our valid objections to menslib to us just needing to "grow up." I think you misunderstood his comment. When he said "grow and mature" it's a phrase that more often is used akin to "fully realize your potential" while "grow up" usually means "you need to catch up to everyone else your age because you're childish." There are very different connotations in the phrasing. I really don't think that guy meant it the way you took it.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:48 PM
6

addressing all emotions and exploring their source and directing towards root causes will make them become a productive source of insight rather than problematic crap to deal with. This is the basic concept of proper conflict resolution. If I had my way, it would be taught in schools as a required course every year k-12.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:45 PM
13

I'm on the same page as you. I am tired of the Pendulum of swinging the same dynamic from one side to the other. I just want it to end. No one side needs to be on top of the other, and I won't support any group that is just trying to swing the pendulum in their favor.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:43 PM
4

"Two is better than one, right?!?!"
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:20 PM
4

Lambs wouldn't commit murder if they could. ANTIFA would.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 12:00 AM
1

Apparently it isn't as proven as I thought it was, but here is probably the most unbiased material you'll find on it with sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_conspiracy_theory
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 12:00 AM
3

Well actually... The definition of mass murder is 4 or more people. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_murder But I was talking about the larger groups of them, not detroit's pass-time.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 10:20 PM
1

Unless it's a smaller group in the government and they are using it to build up support over a long period of time and we aren't at the end of it yet. And it wouldn't be the first time our government did such a thing either. They have admitted to sacrificing pearl harbor and all it's civillians along with the eight battleships and their crews on purpose in order to get support for joining the war in the pacific. Even before prohibition, they poisoned industrial alcohol so it blinded or killed pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 09:50 PM
36

ANTIFA is a textbook example of the "Wolf in sheep's clothing." They are everything they claim to hate, and they claim to hate it for the sole purpose of being able to get away with being criminals openly.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:58 PM
-8

That's no more unreasonable than my belief that most of the US's mass shootings in the last few years were actually staged by our government in order to justify things they want to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:55 PM
7

It's also a tactic when you are filming something and planning on editing it to your benefit. If the video started with her getting hit rather than her spraying pepper spray, it would look very different to the observer, and our media does things like that all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:53 PM
48

Been working around the globe for thousands of years.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:51 PM
-2

I think people's issues with this is the wording. When you say "Every thing" you aren't leaving anything out of it. You aren't leaving room for exceptions. While I don't doubt it's not what you meant, it does imply than if everything you see was made by men, none of it was made by women. The everything/nothing part is a problem in a lot of things relating to civil rights. Personally, I think most things would be improved by avoiding that, so when someone goes and claims you are sexist for saying…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:56 PM
36

Double down and undercut your detractor's credibility. No need to prove you are right if you can show your detractors are idiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/18 03:56 PM
3

Everyone in my department at work has a name that sounds like a word. We have a Crystal, Chase, Grant, Phil, and Raine.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/18 05:03 AM
2

The face on that looks like Nicholas Cage.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/17 03:53 PM
14

To be fair, that wall had it coming.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:14 PM
2

They aren't just cool, they are entertaining too.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:56 PM
6

This is exactly what I thought when I read his comment too. I want their group to break apart and cease to be, but wishing death on people is crossing a line.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:59 PM
7

Fair points, I was looking at it from an outsiders perspective, not thinking about what they were seeing.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 05:09 PM
1

Yeah, Thor is the white knight there, pushing him away when he tried to help the dumb girl up.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 04:35 PM
35

The entire feminist movement should be in there.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:49 PM
18

You all clearly know what the internet is for.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:28 PM
5

Universal daycare would also provide numerous jobs to run and organize it. It would also free up people who can't afford daycare now to rejoin the workforce instead of staying at home watching their kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/17 01:53 AM
5

they are afraid of anything that takes away the power between women legs This is basically the root of the problem. It hasn't been about equal rights for a long time, it has been about power and control.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 08:45 PM
2

2-You talk to your SO and do whatever the hell works for the two of you regardless of what the rest of the world thinks of it. 3-Agreed.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:04 PM
1

Is this the pirate version?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 04:44 PM
7

That was me sarcastically emulating things the feminist movement has said.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:10 PM
6

I'm sorry I jumped into the discussion I see nothing for you to be sorry about.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:58 PM
3

Well cis-gendered men are the root of all evil, the cause of every bad thing. We are to blame for literally everything wrong with the world. Even the female rapists are our fault. It's only natural they don't want them tainting the purity of their victimhood.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:53 PM
32

Men's rights don't exist, only feminism. If you aren't talking about feminism, you aren't talking about men's rights and they have to stop you. If they allowed men's rights to exist outside their control they would lose their monopoly on "equal" rights. (and yeah, those were sarcastic quotes)
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:50 PM
16

Women who choose a more "traditional" stay at home role are routinely attacked by modern feminism. So are women who get sexually assaulted by other women.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:48 PM
2

On that we agree! Personally though, when I do come across someone who does mistreat people over their hobbies, they end up lower priority than the hobbies. Most other people and actually important things in life are higher priorities though.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:42 PM
3

Oh, I'd agree that it is less common, but I am also related to people who think they can treat someone poorly, specifically because games shouldn't matter to people.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:21 PM
11

On the other hand, people who use the excuse "it's only a game" to shit all over another person, aren't really people at all.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:55 PM
4

The trauma isn't because they had sex. The trama is because someone stole their autonomy and used their body against their will and they couldn't stop it. It is a violation as vial as slavery or murder, no matter the circumstances.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:19 PM
12

They claim that, but mostly to shut down any group that isn't them that is fighting for equality. In practice (at least in my experience) it is used to justify a "one of us or against us" attitude rather than any kind of equality. If they let any other group have a voice in equal rights that would mean the lose their monopoly on it.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:43 PM
8

And also how anyone who fights for equal rights has to be a feminist or they can't be allowed to exist.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:41 PM
28

The fulfillment comes primarily from the feeling that you are needed. Typically men hate to feel useless, and if we feel like we have nothing to contribute we tend to not be happy with the situation. Providing for a family fulfills that desire.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:39 PM
1

Yeah, that is about how I was thinking it would be.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:39 PM
2

Velveeta is Culinarily Weaponized Styrofoam
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:29 PM
1

Are they allowed to be rented out for private events? Then pass the discrimination blame off to the people holding the event?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:26 PM
2

"I'm 18 percent victim!"
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:22 PM
1

Bearing in mind that there are multiple definitions of racism, and it is possible to fall into one of them regardless of what I say, I would say that by my explaination, you would be both not racist (from your point of view) and racist (from the point of view of anyone who thought it did make other races better) at the same time. For the determination of racism, it doesn't matter whether the statement is fact or not, it only matters how people view it. Which is why so many things can be both rac…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:35 PM
1

Is it that kind of thing? That and worse. She has also had hands down pants and been grabbed and had tongues stuck down her throat. Basically in a "see if she is lesbian" way. Contrast that to her actually going into the mens restrooms when able and according to her, the worst she gets is surprised looks before everyone continues on with their business of not letting anyone see their dicks while we pee and not talking to each other. And how often does it happen? Frequency, according to her (so I…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:03 AM
2

Well to be fair, most conversations now days are assuming the negative connotation, so it wasn't an unreasonable thing to assume... I was just answering the "can it", which I took as "is it possible" rather than "Is it likely" lol.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:44 PM
11

There are certain medical circumstances that make it necessary to remove it. If a person isn't in one of them, then it should wait until they can legally consent to body modification... personal I don't think parents should be allowed to make that decision about kids for them (unless medically needed). I feel the same way about piercings. And as for the argument about hygiene, teach your kids to wash their dicks. Problem solved.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/17 08:03 PM
3

Here is the definition of racism I am going off of here, and my supporting argument will be using it: showing discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another. Mainly the last part. It depends heavily on the interpreter of data's moral weights, but if they believe a set of data shows that one race is superior to another, for example because they don't murder each other, then that person will, according to their own moral weight…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:21 PM
7

Sure, it is pretty clear that they mean to equate men as the gender that contains monsters.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:54 PM
2

And since the question is from the point of view of a woman in a relationship, that person is most likely to be a man, because homosexuality is a minority. My SO is a heterosexual woman. She prefers to use mens restrooms because she only gets odd looks from surprised men who don't really care about her presence, rather than the sexual assault she gets from other women in women's restrooms. Stating that men are most likely to be the abusers defeats the purpose of the question. If she actually mea…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:53 PM
4

Quite frankly, women are far more physically abusive than men, but like most things, they aren't as effective physically powerful on average as men, generally, are. FTFY because one could accurately make the argument that because they don't leave marks and can do it for much longer with no ill effect to themselves, getting away with it, women are far more effective at abusing people than a man who gives a woman a black eye. I think effective is the wrong word to use there.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:44 PM
4

It heavily implies by the way it is stated, that monsters and men are the only two categories of abusers. It is lost on this author that ALL abusers ARE monsters, even if they aren't freakishly disfigured. That by itself makes the statement wrong, even if we don't get into abuse statistics. You can selectively pick out definitions for several things in the sentence that make it TECHNICALLY correct (men=humans, monsters being either literal or metaphorical, etc.), but that doesn't change the fact…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:39 PM
3

Yes, a statement can be both racist and true. Just like you can be both paranoid and have people after you.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:33 PM
5

If that is the case she is deliberately using an ambiguous term that has clear alternatives as a very, very poor disguise to get people thinking "men are evil" while being able to technically claim her statements aren't sexist.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:27 PM
3

Fair point.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/17 01:26 PM
12

That made me laugh a lot. Thanks!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/17 01:19 PM
16

She wasn't what I'd call willowy. Her guard actually wasn't there to be blown past, the the things she was throwing could hardly be called punches.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/17 01:15 PM
9

I also know plenty who wish their dad had gotten custody and are in therapy because of their single mothers. Fortunately, both your point and mine are anecdotal.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:28 PM
1

This is why I think performance bonuses shouldn't be included in the studies.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 10:22 PM
36

"my life is ruined now because I failed at fucking an innocent person's life to metaphorical death for my own convenience!" FTFY
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 10:00 PM
3

but doesn't give a lot of information This is completely true. It lacks information for anyone to say difinitively whether she was a gold digger or an actually deserving person. And by the same coin, whether or not the judge was actually ruling what he thought was best.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:28 PM
2

I am not the person saying they were a gold digger, I was just pointing out that people get around the common law marriage stuff pretty easily. They also do it for a lot of reasons, some more wholesome than others. Honestly, I don't think anyone in this thread has enough information to actually tell whether she was a gold digger or not, so I am certainly not going to be making that claim.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:26 PM
12

Nothing in the article indicates she met any of the duties of a stay at home spouse. If the guy is rich, there is even a very real chance the child was raised by servants, and home-keeping duties were done by the same. We don't know either way.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:01 PM
8

Which is probably why the relationshsip was "rocky". If the common law marriage is "if they live together for 5 years etc." then at 4.5 years they break up, he moves out for 6 months, and then they get back together again. The common law stuff never actually happens in this case. I have known people who did this. Of course they were doing it to avoid losing the "single mother" welfare benefits, but they still did it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 07:58 PM
3

http://www.countryliving.com/life/travel/a39092/cherry-picking/
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 07:54 PM
19

...or a court order, which they do if it gets challenged in court. *or at least they are supposed to, whether they do or not is a different matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 07:51 PM
2

Lol, I want to say, "Lack of evidence is evidence itself," but I really, really hate that phrase, so I will just say, "you make a fair point."
/r/MensRights18/09/17 06:42 PM
0

red, misled rebel-esque. Not communist, libertarian... ish.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:17 PM
1

That is because the feminist movement is successfully gatekeeping equal rights. You are either with them or you are a mysogynistic racist douche. Totally not possible to be for equal rights it you are not a feminist. (/s in case that wasn't clear)
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:13 PM
1

Lying by ommision comes from tailoring your product for your target group of consumers. They just don't want to admit that their audience is very biased.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:10 PM
2

Aha, so the chem trails are Lead! (/s)
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:04 PM
0

Both are failing people. Down with government or corporate run populations.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:02 PM
5

Yeah, I really don't think that this is a boys vs girls thing. This is just a case of the girls producing a better headline, so they get written about. I agree. If boys were at a 40-year high, they'd be in the headlines. I disagree. Girls will almost always make a better headline, because our society enshrines the idea of protecting that gender. We would need sweeping societal changes before the same thing for guys would make even half as effective a headline.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:00 PM
1

you're not wrong. Yes, he is. We haven't carpet bombed things in a while. We would drone strike the schools and say it was killing insurgents :P
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:56 PM
2

The line reminds me of demolition man.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 05:13 PM
1

Well, most words in English can be used multiple ways. For example: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/opinion Gives two definitions of the word Opinion: A view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. A statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter. If I were trying to use the your example, I would say that both of us had differing interpretations of what those statistics meant, rather than opinion, because based on those definitions…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:35 PM
1

You are conflating the belief of something being true with fact. They are not the same. Someone can believe something is true, for example flat earth, without any fact backing it up. The fact that this guy is self aware to differentiate his opinions with fact means he understands that difference. I don't care for opinions not based in fact. And that is all you need to say. The rest of your argument is either wasted, or full of fallacies. The fact that it is his opinion removes it from importance…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:03 PM
1

He stated plainly that it was an opinion. He is not presenting it as a fact. The only person here claiming it is a fact is you, as you try to argue against it. You are committing so many logical fallacies I can't name them all.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:01 PM
2

That seems like a big stretch of inference. It is entirely possibly he believes his opinions are correct, but understands that perspective plays a part and that other people might have differing opinions that he would consider valid, even if he doesn't agree with them. People are complex like that, not as cut and dried as you seem to be making it out to be. By all means attack his opinions, as he could be basing them on false info, but attacking the fact that he has opinions, or attacking his ri…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 05:12 PM
1

I would say something like "Hey I was trying to google them, did you means Dickens? It's the name i am finding, but I want to make sure it's the same guy." That is if I would say anything. Saying it that way lets them realize their mistake without it being someone else correcting them, and puts us both on the same level. Most of the time though, unless I know them, I probably won't say anything.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 05:04 PM
4

In my case, if I think my SO isn't acting in good faith, she wouldn't be my SO very much longer. That trust is basically sacred.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:36 PM
6

No, she is saying being born with a vagina should let her be allowed to be wrong and the whole world accommodate her ignorance and allow her to persist in it.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:35 PM
2

only making claims & stating opinions as fact No he didn't, he stated they were opinions.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:24 PM
36

crying about everything means you lack self control. FTFY :P
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:02 PM
8

I think it diminishes the usefulness of language as a thinking tool instead of expanding it. Redefining literally any word for your political agenda does that. If it is a new thing, give it a new word. If it is not a new thing, use the words that already exist for it.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:14 PM
23

I like pointing out to them that they are gatekeeping equal rights, and seeing the meltdown of logic behind their eyes.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:11 PM
2

Aaaaw I member! Member The Chewbacca Defense?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:06 PM
24

You can say that again
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:35 PM
2

I recommend using a good video editor and making it look like you are legitimately breaking the laws of physics and defying space-time.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:26 PM
2

Drill Sergeant just don't count the first 49 attempts at a pushup before they let them pass with 1 proper push-up completed. Same sort of thing can apply to running or any other exercise.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:25 PM
1

I wonder how many Australian Drill Sergeants are planning on counting the first 20 attempts at a push-up as "Improper" so not counting towards completion lol.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:20 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the key word is actually Political Agenda. It's fine if people die for that. /s
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:16 PM
9

Bear in mind that that this is the same army that went to war armed with machine guns against flightless birds... and lost to the birds. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu_War Can we really expect much from them anyway?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:12 PM
2

Personally, I 100% agree.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:02 AM
1

Ah see, with more context that that screenshot, I totally agree with you.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:14 PM
1

I don't disagree with you, but only offering an explanation as to why it might happen sometimes: In some places it isn't legally rape unless they did penetration. If the woman didn't use a strap-on or dildo or something else, in those places it wasn't legally rape... technically.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:50 PM
0

Agreed, but the screen shot says she was an ex-teacher. Also the screenshot doesn't even provide age, just that they were students. For all we know they were in their 30s.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:47 PM
-3

The screenshot says they were students, not children. They could have been 4 35 year old men for all we know.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:46 PM
3

Much as I don't want to, I have to agree. If someone has a link to the actual story that might change, but it says she is an Ex-teacher, who had sex with students. Ages aren't related in the screenshot. It could very well have been the acts of consensual adults all around. Since she was an ex-teacher, rather than a current teacher, she may not have been abusing a position of power at all. Then again it is worded in a way that also doesn't rule out that she fucked 4 special needs 9 year olds. So …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:44 PM
2

And that is why the google fu comes before trying it lol. Thanks bro.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:25 PM
1

Never heard of that, must engage in google fu to determine if joke or not, then possibly try it.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:17 PM
4

can't No one is saying they can't. People are saying that when a guy is manspreading it is about sitting comfortably, rather than about gender dominance displays that it is accused of being.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:48 PM
7

They were, 40-50 years ago.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:44 PM
3

Unless you are allergic to it.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:43 PM
2

No one wants pants.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:44 PM
2

Holy crap! I wish we had those here in the U.S.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:08 PM
0

Mental Health Care professionals that want to help patients rather than create customers.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:02 PM
2

Both groups contain mysoginists, and unless they do something about the misogynynists in their group, they are tacitly condoning it, I agree. However if they actually try to curtail misogyny in their group, then you can say they don't normalize it.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:51 PM
5

feminism Are you one of those people who thinks the term feminism only covers the rational feminists who honestly want to make the world a better place, but not the crazy power mad ones? Because you'd be wrong, since both of them act under the guise of feminism the term applies to both types of people. I imagine the person you quoted was talking about the second type, not the first type. But honestly, until the first type actually does something about the second type, they are tacitly condoning …
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:06 PM
1

No it doesn't. The word you are looking for is condescending. No, that word just means "a criminal going down some stairs."
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:58 PM
4

Some people just want to watch the world burn.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:55 PM
27

"Don't believe everything you read on the internet" -Abraham Lincoln
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:53 PM
1

I loved those from the first mass effect game.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:50 PM
3

Lol, I misread your post I was replying to. I'll leave mine as is though.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:42 PM
7

Can they point to anything we want to do that's not equality oriented? When half the feminist movement advocates taking all rights away from men and not equalizing the gender representation in positions of power, but removing one gender from them entirely, then yeah, I can. But then most of the time the reply is "Those aren't real feminists." And the problem with that is that that is real feminist leaders, the people at the front who most others either follow or get out of the way of doing and s…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:24 PM
10

Just think about the normal, kind heart women, and men, who just want the world to be better and call themselves feminists (which are the majority). I have never met one of those in 30 years. Where are they? You know who I have met? I've met normal, kind heart women, and men, who just want the world to be better and call themselves former feminists, who now refuse to associate with such a hate filled group as the feminist movement. They tell me that they looked into so many of the feminist claim…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:15 PM
2

I am not a lawyer, so this is according to my own understanding, not a law book. 'Statutory' as far as I know, is just another word for 'legally'. As far as I know "Statutory Rape' can be used in any situation that has one person unable to legally consent to the sex. As I understand it this is one reason why having sex with a drunk person is rape: They can't consent legally, even if they really want to have sex with you. In a child's case, they often lack perspective on the consequences and have…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:24 PM
8

Some really fucking sick people think that manipulating someone who is totally in your power into having sex with you doesn't qualify as rape. AKA "Statutory rape isn't the same thing as rape".
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:47 PM
11

Rape by force or rape by coercion. Both are still rape.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:42 PM
4

Were it up to me the child would be removed from the rapist and if willing given to the legally upright parent. I don't think rapists should ever be allowed to raise children.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:40 PM
2

As far as I am concerned statutory rape is rape through coercion. It is as bad as telling a woman that if she doesn't sleep with you you will have her fired, blacklisted, and bring false charges against her.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:37 PM
18

While we are at it can we change the sex offender registry to those convicted instead of anyone ever accused?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:20 PM
1

You asked: Why the fuck would I need my partner's consent for my paternity test? I replied: Because the law actually says you do. Evidence suggests you are the only dumb fuck here. I neither stated nor implied support for the law only answered the question of a retarded jackass who can't post without making a shit ton of assumptions about other people.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:43 PM
1

Feminism has two sides, one wants everything fair, the other uses feminism as a platform to achieve power and dominance. I am perfectly willing to help the first, but the second can burn in hell along with everyone else seeking power and dominance over other people.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:38 PM
1

Because the law actually says you do.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:32 PM
4

In the US it isn't illegal to get private DNA testing done to prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:24 PM
5

That is definitely a thing in basically every major issue.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:22 PM
1

Fair point, I am not up on those, this was more than two decades ago.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:17 PM
13

My dad had to physically stop them from preforming the procedure on me and my brothers.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:26 PM
22

I've never seen a report ask a terrorist their gender. Maybe 100% of terrorist genders are assumed and we all need to fucking check ourselves!
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/17 04:19 PM
4

Guys, I found the screeching autist!!!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:01 PM
1

You should have picked 'active woodchipper', I mean, it's even in the name.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 03:01 AM
5

You can't fight fire with fire Off topic, but, yes you can: http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/natural-disasters/fight-fire-with-fire.htm :D
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:49 PM
1

Exactly. Some people actually like assholes... like all the guys she was sleeping with :D
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/17 10:44 PM
1

Unfortunately it is still on the internet, so it is obviously still correct, as is the newer information.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/17 10:38 PM
7

It would probably look more professional as "Teacher found guilty of three counts of statutory rape of students" but yeah, I would be fine with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 02:51 AM
33

And I am saying that new media shouldn't be deliberately downplaying it by always leaving that word out of their headlines. It should be there, because that is what it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 02:27 AM
2

pleaded guilty to three counts of forcible sex abuse in April 2015. In exchange, 11 charges were dropped, including three first-degree felony rape charges, according to local reports. Something tells me this wasn't simple statutory rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 01:58 AM
4

Am 31, am still immature :P
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 01:53 AM
12

I'm a mormon and I didn't even know about that. I know people who would rationalize that though, so I'd believe it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 01:49 AM
56

It shouldn't go without saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 01:44 AM
1

if you have the desire i hope you find someone trustworthy to enjoy sex with one day. I will also wish you well.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 03:59 AM
1

You have unlimited opportunity to communicate your thoughts in this format. I'm sure that with enough attempts, you can convey your meaning without seeing my ACT scores first. ;) I doubt you have any ACT scores, since your main point of argument seems to be abortion, which I couldn't care less about, and the person you are arguing against (me) is arguing against enforced child support, not abortion. We don't live in a country with a large enough social network for the state to pay to raise the r…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 03:00 AM
1

I'm not attracted enough to anyone to. Sex just doesn't hold the appeal to me that it seems to to the rest of the human race.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 01:57 AM
1

I have a solution for you. Actually, I have a solution for my self: I don't have sex. With anyone. I almost feel bad telling you that, since it ruins all the delusions you've built up in your mind about me, but there it is. you just can't think your way out of. Lol, you of all people saying this.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 11:00 PM
2

Thankfully, one of the best things about being kind of stupid is an absence of awareness of or capacity to understand one's own stupidity. It'll keep you thinking you're right : ) Your self awareness is astounding. lmao.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 10:58 PM
1

If you had passed basic reading comprehension you might pick up that I am indifferent about whether anyone aborts. I simply think it is unfair for after a woman decides not to, they can also decide the man has to pay for it for the next 18 years, where the man gets absolutely no say in the abortion. If they decide to keep it on their own, they should pay for it on their own. The only people that should be paying for it are the ones that are going to be part of it's life. Kind of like how if the …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 07:50 PM
1

Dude, if you have sex, you are taking a risk. Someone should have taught you that by now. In that situation, you literally have first choice and thus ultimate control over your future financial situation. Here you are either implying that both people involved don't have first choice, or you are really into rape. Since in reality both people have a choice to start it (unless you are into rape), but in the end, only the woman has a choice, you are still spouting retarded shit. You're just one of t…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:58 PM
2

Actually I am whining about laws that give one person control over another's financial future based on their biology, but please, keep saying retarded things, it's a great laugh.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:44 PM
2

Yep, sure can. As long as you are holding both parties equally responsible. Unfortunately the current law only gives one of the parties a choice in the matter once the deed is done, so they aren't held equally responsible. Which still makes your statement somewhat retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:34 PM
3

The fact that you think having sexual responsibility has anything to do with whether I am a man or not does indeed sound retarded to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:08 PM
3

You do understand that when it comes to things legal, morality died a long time ago. I'll take anything I can to protect myself in a court setting. Just be a man and... In the whole history of the human race has this ever been used as anything other than as a prelude to something retarded?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 06:34 AM
1

I agree complete. I was just mentioning that as something that might be pursued, if he hasn't tried already. In our current world where men are bad and patriarchy is evil because they exist, I doubt we will ever see laws passed to stop enforced male parenthood.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 01:44 AM
9

Yeah, but he might be able to rid himself and the child of the woman... depending on the state.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 11:41 PM
47

There are legal arguments for that being rape. (Conditional consent for sex, based on them having taken the pill. They didn't take it so they had sex with you without consent) Though I am not sure if it has actually succeeded in court.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 10:27 PM
16

Can it be proven in court? Things that are near impossible to prove in court shouldn't be qualifiers in a law in my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 10:24 PM
2

I looked it up, you are right, it is a crime, but not treason (according to this: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 04:31 AM
3

Actually, the FBI said she did do it, they just weren't recommending charges be pressed. You aren't alone in your delusion that no charges equates to innocence though.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 12:46 AM
1

I would have been okay with him, because I thought he was too ineffectual to do any harm.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 12:43 AM
1

Though y'all lived in log cabins and drank syrup all day If they did, they would have a much larger illegal immigration problem than even Trump could cause.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 12:38 AM
7

'Probably' may be the wrong word here. The ones I have spoken to are absolutely 100% in denial. Personally, I am expecting all 5 stages of grief from them.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:17 PM
3

Yeah, if you are going to go in for this kind of thing you have to be okay with the idea that they are going to be having sex with strangers too. She was a dumbass for going into it assuming he wouldn't have sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 05:19 PM
4

This can not be upvoted enough. This should be what kids get told in school.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:29 PM
4

Most vocal Feminists haven't been interested in equality for more than a decade.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:25 PM
1

You softie, you!
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:22 PM
25

Also loud dumbasses are heard over normal people.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 05:13 PM
-2

He is equating 'taking advantage of someone who's brain doesn't function' to 'taking advantage of someone who disabled their brain with alcohol' and it is a pretty accurate comparison. I wouldn't touch that bitch with a 10 foot pole.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/16 06:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter