TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CrystalineAxiom Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by CrystalineAxiom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Do you guys think the same people who designed and built the bathrooms are now using them or are you just spiting random women for the hell of it?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 03:43 AM
2

Look at the other responses. Holy shit people just assume they know everything, don't they? Kind of embarrassing.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:36 PM
3

Should we be ashamed of Caesar? You are arguing something completely different from what I just said? I merely said it should be taught and known. I didn't say anything about being ashamed of it. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are on your shit list also I assume Uh, no? But I do think that all their actions should be taught. Not just the good ones or bad ones. Glorifying the past is as bad as vilifying it. You seem to really want to put me in a box here so you can dismiss the things I've…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:57 PM
3

Creators of the modern world order for 500 years. Sure, none of that contradicts what the other person said; they were also rapists and mass murderers. You shouldn't teach only the parts of history you like. It's important to teach all of history, both the good and the bad. Otherwise you end up with textbooks like this one that describes the Trail of Tears as First Nations people agreeing to make room for settlers.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:05 PM
2

Yeah, I think it would be good for kids to know that "creating the modern world order" consists in large part of being really good at genocide. It's not just Europe, most large civilizations have histories involving genocide. In fact, it's pretty much a fluke that the Mongols didn't wipe Europe off the map the same way the Native Americans were. History is chock full of that kind of thing. It's not always pretty, but it's the truth. And it's good to know about so that we can try to do better.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:00 PM
6

Here's a similar one. Fucking guy uses a train horn. Why do people feel the need to fuck with people doing a shitty minimum wage job?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/18 03:22 AM
2

Also the boy scouts opened up their ranks because of plummeting memberships, not because of some feminist crusade. Honestly, it's occasionally a little cringey how often feminists get blamed for things in this sub.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:04 PM
2

The majority of those first ten entries you linked don't involve false rape accusations. Several were actual rapes with mistaken identities and one involved a medical examiner that lied about a ton of different crimes in order to get convictions. Miscarriages of justice, for sure, but it's actually pretty good evidence against the idea that false accusations are a problem that merits the kind of national attention they're currently getting. In fact, by way of comparison there are over a thousand…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:28 AM
1

Where did you get 80/20 for murders? All the stats I've seen show that men murder at almost 10 times the rate of women. It's 90/10.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:13 AM
1

Depends on the touching. If you grab a tit out of nowhere or start grinding up on a stranger, that's sexual assault well before anyone has had a chance to be uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:03 AM
4

Is there a reason you're ignoring my counterexample? Do you think showing an example where the perpetrator doesn't matter proves that it never matters like you claimed earlier? I honestly don't know what the train of thought here is supposed to be.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 07:48 PM
3

Of course? Example: A student getting in a fight at school is hardly as bad as a parent being violent towards their child. Where the violence came from is actually pretty damn important.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:21 PM
3

I'm curious, do you also feel that way when the topic is police not taking male victims of domestic violence seriously?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:17 PM
1

Eh, that doesn't jibe with the stats. When you look at numbers for intimate partner violence, men are several times more likely to send their partner to the hospital and three times as likely to kill them. Solid reversal attempt though.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:12 PM
6

Additionally, I suspect less people are less willing to talk to friends about their partner hitting them than they are about having cancer.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 05:55 PM
0

Good point. I was talking about America, but you're right that feminism is older in other parts of the world.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:34 AM
-1

Senate and congress is about 80% white and 80% male, but, yeah, I guess if you make a strawman like "whites are in control of everything" you're right. Goodness, I can't believe I said men were in control of everything. Oh wait, I didn't say that. Come back when you can make an honest argument.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:30 AM
0

Wait, so you agree it's bad but you don't think its toxic? lol, what even is your point here? Some feminists in the 1950's were bad, so now you're going to fight against something that will help men out of spite?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:28 AM
-2

all of them are made up to paint the men as the responsible one about all those problems Makes sense considering feminism is 100 years old and men were actually in charge of everything back then. In fact, society was pretty much exclusively controlled by rich white guys back then, and to a large extent it still is. Kind of weird to invent a conspiracy theory to explain a word choice that can be easily explained by historical circumstances.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:01 PM
-1

This guy in the 1850's. "Abolitionists never talk about the good thing whites do; they just talk about slavery. Must be because they hate whites."
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:58 PM
-7

That's not what toxic masculinity means. Toxic masculinity is a subset of masculinity that makes men do stupid shit like die in wars or kill people because society tells them that's what it takes to be a man.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:45 PM
-3

Once
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:42 PM
2

I wouldn't have been able to have children and impose discipline with my ex and her mom and sisters meddling around. See, now that's different from grandparents overturning discipline. Both adults in the household need to be on the same page. It's important to regularly discuss how the children are raised so that you're both cooperating. It may come down to kids being unruly because "Nana lets me do whatever I want". As long as you make a clear demarcation between when they're at their grandpare…
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 04:24 PM
5

A grandparent's spoiling shouldn't have any effect on discipline. That's a failure of the parents.
/r/MGTOW16/09/18 06:14 PM
18

Boys being raped isn't important? Jesus Christ I don't understand some people. It seems like some are willing to throw any number of men under the bus as long as it means you can score political points against feminists. Can we maybe have one conversation about sexual assault and rape of men without it getting derailed? It's no wonder this never gets picked up and discussed in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:41 PM
0

Women don't do the thing that the woman in the comment above is doing?
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:27 PM
6

OK... first, that's not what hyperbole means. Hyperbole means exaggerated statements that aren't meant to be literal. Second, I do have data, I even referred to it in my post: "When you look at the distribution of people who have been caught lying about rape...". That part of what I wrote is based on what I discovered when I read through the national exoneration registry files for cases involving rape. I specifically kept track of the case details for rape convictions involving false accusations…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 08:59 PM
9

Could you point out what I said that was hyperbolic? No offense, but I think you either don't know what that word means or you didn't understand what I wrote.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 06:07 PM
8

I'm talking about stuff like lying for attention and making up crazy stories. The people who know her would have almost certainly encountered behavior like this before. Moreover, if you know someone who is capable of making up a story like this, you've probably noticed something like that too. Think about it this way. Imagine publicly accusing someone you know... maybe even dislike... of pedophilia or rape when you know it isn't true. There's no way you'd do that, right? It's so far out that it'…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 05:35 PM
16

If that's true it's pretty much guaranteed she'll have a history of behavior like this. Normal, well-adjusted people almost never do crazy shit like this. If she is making a claim like this for attention, she's done similar things before.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 04:40 PM
4

Historically, the DA wants convictions and will condone arresting men on the flimsiest of evidence. What? No they don't. In fact, doing that generally messes up their conviction rates. They almost never arrest for a big crime like this unless they feel like they have a convincing case. Arresting someone is admitting a crime happened. Not convicting someone is letting them get away. So if they just arrested people on flimsy evidence it would make it look like their precinct has a ton of crime tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 04:36 PM
9

I get where you're coming from, but the reaction in this subreddit shows that a lot of people have no idea that polygraphs are disproven junk science. The US is one of the last nations where those damn things are allowed as evidence. The last thing we need is to see their usage make a comeback.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:55 PM
83

Polygraphs are unreliable and only tell you what people believe to be true. Wrong. They're unreliable and tell you basically nothing. They detect shifts in heart rate and other biometric signals that correlate with emotional reactions. So simply asking an emotional question is enough to generate a hit. Come on dude. Don't spread misinformation about polygraphs. Those things have been putting innocent people in prison for decades.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:30 PM
1

Off the top of my head GTA V, all of the Call of Duty games, Horizon Zero Dawn, God of War, Heavy Rain, Red Dead Redemption, and Just Cause 3 all have male characters you're supposed to build a connection with who are not conventionally attractive. When I mentally tally all the ugly men and ugly women I've seen in games, I keep coming up with far more men. But, that's also just my personal experience. In any case, us coming up with only the stuff we can remember isn't a very good way to go about…
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 11:09 PM
4

Not always. Even in TLOU you have Bill and Henry.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 05:14 PM
8

Yeah. At first it annoyed me, but then I realized that there are tons of ugly dudes in pretty much every game I've ever played, so... eh.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 03:50 PM
1

The original game did that and was amazing.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 03:42 PM
1

That's kind of a silly criticism. You can use it to criticize literally any change made in any game ever.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 03:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter