| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Putting the "nice guy" vs "jerk" vs "kind" debate to rest. [Part 1]Agreed | /r/seduction | 11/02/21 12:16 AM |
| 1 | Putting the "nice guy" vs "jerk" vs "kind" debate to rest. [Part 1]What would be a possible solution? Women are irrational creatures | /r/seduction | 10/02/21 11:06 PM |
| 2 | Putting the "nice guy" vs "jerk" vs "kind" debate to rest. [Part 1]I think the issue with that is that if two ppl in a relationship are both assuming that the other person understands what they want then nobody knows anything. They are just guessing from what they would want. You may be right that the responsibility falls on the masculine to clarify what the other person is thinking | /r/seduction | 10/02/21 10:53 PM |
| 2 | Putting the "nice guy" vs "jerk" vs "kind" debate to rest. [Part 1]Good point. My thinking was along the lines of the covert contract. If I do “a” for her then she will give me “b” | /r/seduction | 10/02/21 10:38 PM |
| 3 | Putting the "nice guy" vs "jerk" vs "kind" debate to rest. [Part 1]Don’t forget that the ”nice guy” often feels that the woman will reciprocate (often with sex), although it was never communicated. The lack of verbal communication is usually his downfall | /r/seduction | 10/02/21 07:46 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter