TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cute-Baseball9342 Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by Cute-Baseball9342 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Women can tell when a man is a tidy person vs if he's seeking validation via sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:18 PM
1

To be very clear. I have multiple different accounts just for algorithm and both parties across the board are actually growing at an alarming rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:23 PM
–

Depends on the person. Like a singular trait can be the thing that throws off your entire facial cohesion. People, most, don't actually know what makes faces attractive. Fat deposits bo structure muscle structure etc. Proportions and semmetry are important more to attractiveness than the actual mix of traits. Angelina Jolie has massive lips. They are typically not seen as attractive but her face can specifically pull them off. Meanwhile women who get cosmetic surgeries to do it just look weird. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:26 PM
0

It is literally just true. Pretty much most studies confirm this even in below average men. You won't do as good as an attractive guy. You'll just be better than before. That being said, unattractiveness is different for each person. Facial cohesion is a thing and one trait can throw it off so badly it makes u look below average. So the combination of reasons as to why someone is unattractive in the first place is different. For example weak chin, bad cheek bones. Can really make a face unattrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:08 PM
0

Nice anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:51 PM
1

Not cologne alone. That's a disingenuous framing of the conversation. I'm sure you know it. Cologne good clothes and good grooming.. altogether make a positive difference
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:34 PM
0

Not going into the medical field to gain sexual advantage instead of helping people
/r/seduction10/10/25 06:42 AM
–

You got it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:53 PM
–

Also out of curiosity. Not related but how old are you, your edu level and occupation?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:41 PM
–

That channel is like the biggest spread of the RP and most people who come to it come through them and typically usually hold their variety of RP. So you know it's trash and still do it? Explanation justification. This is semantics. People are using their reasoning to do shitty stuff. that's the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:04 PM
–

Did you just give me a chatgpt explanation? Anyway, look up fresh and fit. They literally shit like a man can cheat and that you should accept it because men and women are different. All of their sphere outright says they cheat bc men and women are different. Sneako did, Jon Zherka did. The fact that you genuinely don't believe that people in rp space don't justify male promiscuity is crazy in of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:21 AM
2

Tbh most girls give out numbers to get the guy to back off anyway.
/r/seduction08/10/25 02:05 AM
–

Not at all. You might be explaining over justifying rn. But that's definitely not the stance of everyone that says it. Contextually, I don't even think explaining and justifying are different in this instance. Most people who explain this don't seem to take issue with male promiscuity. A justification is "the act of showing something to be right or reasonable". If you don't dislike male promiscuity because of your explanation. You then think it's reasonable. It is functionally justification. Per…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:54 PM
1

I mean bringing up charity at all is kind of useless. Being charitable and having charities isn't enough to stop mass starvation. I'd only see government systems as being capable of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:48 AM
1

I mean. Most rejection happens in public places and of all instances of attack, the backlash is immediate and happens in the same place the rejection occurs in. I mean all video instances of attacks due to rejection happens in public places too. What do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:41 AM
1

Yessir
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:37 AM
–

"Male flight" Is a term when men leave as more women fill in
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:35 AM
–

I mean a guy building streets doesn't mean he's good in a relationship how about that. He could be but like not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:34 AM
1

I think that studies matter more than pointless hypotheticals we can't prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:23 AM
2

I mean inexperienced and single...if she's young. Not if she's older. It's a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:23 AM
1

I'm not projecting. I was actually just flipping what you said. 🤣🤣 It's not that I can't answer them. But it's moreso why should I? What's more accurate? A study that actually deals with the emotional psychology of men and women. Or a question about brothels and books? I mean it's not brothels are literally illegal in most countries. They are everywhere. And in most of human history a woman not being a virgin/or being unmarried was a social sentence. Women didn't make all too much money either. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:46 AM
11

No. I think that's exactly where self respect comes in. I think it takes a ton of self-value and respect to face the option of being alone vs putting up with women's BS to have a chance. Or rather I think it comes down to valuing your peace of mind. Because it's not totally realistic to just expect people who really wants it to just not put up with BS for it. But it requires a ton of value for your piece of mind and boundaries to
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:37 AM
2

Tbh. My only issue with this conversation is using dating stats is not super indicative of IRL. (Like the 80/20 stats is mostly only reflected in online dating.IRL stats say most people date and marry within their tax bracket. ) And that most dating apps have a massively skewed male to female ratio. Bumble has Abt 18million female users world wide. That's not a lot concentrated in any one country. Tinder's userbase is only 25% female and most women are not even active dating app users. That's a …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:30 AM
1

So have we read any studies about the difference it makes? No I mean go read some studies on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:01 AM
1

You haven't read those studies. Because it's actually not that simple in like...any of them. You have to be trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:59 PM
1

You have to be trolling. When women go men shouldn't get massive counterargument is they are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:57 PM
2

I mean. Most women will tell a guy when they are ugly. It's just that if the personality also matches the ugly it's probably gonna get called before his looks do
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 10:55 PM
6

Depends on exactly how unattractive. They definitely get married alot more than this sub seems to think. But relative to attractive men? Or even average men. Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 10:53 PM
1

Also a bug didn't crawl up my ass. You didn't comprehend my initial statement. I want legislative rights. Not tendencies that favor girls. Unfortunately in discourse you also don't decide if your points are good. Your ability to argue then does and you're tapping out at first push back. 😭 This is purple pill DEBATE. If ur not ready go that leave the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:33 PM
1

I'm saying most of what you listed are. definitionally NOT rights in a statute, legislative sense. Rights aren't when people favor you they are when you have allowances and permissions written in into law. Not tendencies the court tends to take. And I'm pretty sure my research on circumcision is accurate. It's cultural and religious. If you want to call it male circumcision, mutilation, sure. If you want to cry and crash out have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:31 PM
1

Let me point out. All of what you listed are STILL systemic issues genuinely worthy of being addressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 11:46 PM
1

In older laws, yes. In all US jurisdictions today the legislation is written neutrally. That's also, again an example of bias or leniency towards a party. They need to reconsider how they approach these cases rather than the legislation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 11:33 PM
1

Dude. A goot quarter of these are literally not rights as in legislation. I exactly said a court system tending to favor an outcome is not a right. You went on to list like several examples of exactly that. That's an issue with bias not an issue with a law. Did I misword myself did, comprehension failing? Doing it anyway? Often times went a court favors something it's not written in law that they MUST favor it. It's not a right. Second, I'm from the US. I'll be focusing on that. 1. Innocent unti…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 11:28 PM
1

Just for reference. A court system tending to favor someone more isn't have an additional right. And how people tend to socially respond to a group also isn't a legislative right. Women I don't think have any more literal codified rights than men. You can't police how society tends to treat men and women differently. Since that's not a legal thing more than it is a social thing
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:06 AM
1

I'm not talking about forcing men to be good. I think there are an equal amount of bad women as there are men. And yeah women generally aren't violent but history extensively shows they can like men be galvanized towards it. And specifically in situations where they feel they're way of life is oppressively threatened in intolerable ways. Women liter force Rome to repeal several laws due to just how much pressure they were putting on men. Igbo women would burn houses of abusers to the ground and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 08:44 PM
2

Fist destroy existing rules, they don't make rules. Most power has literally been consolidated through political, financial and social moves in all of human history including our caveman counterparts. Also consider this. You still need women to go along willingly to do all of this. Because women now more than ever have tasted freedom on a scale they never had and women now more than ever a **retaliatively* violent. Rome had mass poisonings by women. For reference they thought Rome was being hit …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:29 PM
0

Yeah. I just say this. Attractiveness isn't goodness but they also don't have to be opposed to each other either. Women like confidence and an ability to protect and provide. A violent guy must know how to work his way around violent situations meaning he should know how to protect(if he actually feels inclined to protect us a different conversation). The projected confidence in a willingness to engage in violence and maybe even implied competency. It's why girlies like "alpha criminals" but the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:44 PM
7

I think that's what they mean by contextual alpha. Being the highest SMV relative to the women around. Which doesn't always have to be a money thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:24 PM
1

That's not the reality of most people. 😭😭 But that doesn't change anything either bc We can say women don't wanna be raped cuz they don't wanna deal with the very real physical wear and tear and trauma of rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:21 PM
2

Not really. People have enjoyed dom/sub dynamics and CNC since the dawn of time. Kama Sutra mentions it. Roman and Greek antiquity writers even mention that resistance and struggle basically CNC are points of sexual tension. These societies never went to shit for believing this shit but for some reason YOU'RE an authority on it. You are certainly autistic because this mental hang up and gymnastics makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:19 PM
2

We're already at the might makes right scenario dude. What do you mean by this
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:07 PM
3

I mean if I HAVE to give sex up to maintain my rights nothing was ever fair and equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:53 AM
2

That's another thing I wonder about. Women have never been THIS free. Female violence and retaliation are at an all time high. Women off their partners more now than ever. Guy needs to sleep and they'll have their backs turned, they'll eat the cooking. I just really wonder if we'll have a generation of female family annihilators if they try
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:51 AM
2

I mean you're redpilled so you probably believe women should have some sort of reduced rights
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:45 AM
1

Tbh. I think you don't like women. You have to really just want to see them badly if you can't wrap your head around the fact that what someone might like to entertain in fantasies isn't something they'd wanna do IRL. Call Of Duty to real war. GTA to IRL. Atp that you cannot make terms with this you're willfully holding water for it. And for what reason. It's fucked up but like GTA and COD are fucked up but you're not going around telling lovers of it they're fucked up bc they like it as a fanta…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:26 AM
1

I mean I like running over pedestrians in GTA doesn't mean I wanna do it IRL. It's that simple with rape vs rape fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:20 AM
1

Also Sick System. Most abusers aren't with women of particularly high quality. And tbh it follows that ppl who regularly get into abusive relationships tend to be not so great. And only 25% of the female population reports being abused. Tho it's probably abit more than that. So you also have to account for the fact that this is a bunch of repeat offenders
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:16 AM
2

Not just power but violent men tend to have a lot of indicators. A violent person is used to violence. It's safe to assume that they can handle violence. Which is a core necessity to be a proper protector. Also impulsiveness seems confident. Craziest part is that you don't need to be a bad guy to project these qualities. The red pill is literally talks at lengths exactly about this thing. MRP specifically. These men aren't bad guys but they know how to invoke the same situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:15 AM
1

no but we should've been building smaller scale infrastructure. It's the US' fault they havent built a modular system for power. countries today already have or are working on that exact thing. the good thing with modular and regionalized systems is that they can effectively be isolated redirect cut on and off as needed. JP and Nordic countries had their populations in mind. there isnt a prep that cant be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:55 AM
1

i mean I'm not calling it a death spiral until we drop massively below other centuries. All it takes is a generation for current societies to not have enough people top sustain them but then we downscale.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 11:03 PM
3

It's emotional. I mean like whatever he believes about men and women he has an emotional attachment to. Which is why he can literally say any outlandish ridiculous and unlikely thing to justify it. Even if there is a logical argument that can be made that's not why HE cares. Just remember that when talking to ppl on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 10:07 PM
2

I mean being a side chick nets you benefits but not much more freedom than having your own stuff tbh. and even then how many sidechicks do you think a rich guy will ACTIVELY maintain? definitely not enough for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 10:03 PM
1

dude our population count dwarfs every other century. Yeah we're well below the replacement rate of our current population but like that doesn't mean we're having a death spiral
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 10:01 PM
8

It didn't though. I mean like "women stay at home and men work" is over simplified pop history and the reality was typically never that way. First "love" and "companionship" were not expected in relationships. And more often than not, didn't occur. Men in a lot of cultures wouldn't be punished as severely if at all for stepping out to for their love elsewhere. Women were forced to endure this unfortunate state of affairs. So women didn't get love or emotional support. We know they didn't get goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:54 PM
25

Not really? I mean men don't do the physical act of birth and more often than not physical symptoms and health alterations happen after pregnancy and persisting long after or forever. Permanent energy changes, bone density, muscles, hormones, etc. Pregnancy isn't a one and one thing til the next time for women. they have to live with the physical byproducts of that on their body. men escape the physical consequences of pregnancy almost altogether. And its often massively underplayed just how ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:30 PM
–

Yeah. So I threw the working nugget in there to make a point. I think every other thing I said was more relevant to the topic. Though, I agree with alot of that actually. Point is most women were not happy settling out of necessity. In the 1950s professionals literally thought the entire american female population had "hysteria". In which any female emotional state was chalked up to that. What they called hysteria we know more commonly identify as depression, anxiety, and a whole slew of other s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 06:02 PM
0

I dunno money isn't superficial. It keeps you better fed than love
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:03 PM
–

Nah
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:30 AM
–

Yeah when the world didn't have machines that did 15 man jobs and able bodies were so necessary you couldn't afford to allocate too much work based on gender. And needed alot of hands for just a single person to even eat, since that still requires tending to the fields and killing cattle. But that isn't it anymore. And alot of people lived objectively miserable lives back when which got amplified by a bad partner that alot of the times they couldn't even divorce due to societal expectations. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:28 AM
0

I mean 1 in 4 women have experienced SA. 10% are false reports. Only 30% of SAs go reported at all. 1 in 3 women have experienced Sexual harassment. The average US city is 11k strong. The FBi found multiple GCs 70k strong of men coordinating graping women. Most of those men have gone unarrested. With 4 billion men on the planet a """comparably small amount""" is still massively large with those numbers. Especially considering how Grapist may spread or where they may concentrate. Oregan and Michi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:52 PM
1

So without the personal attack. Men are attracted enough to most women. Women are not. Attraction cannot be negotiated the same way your sexuality can't be altered. Settling for someone you're not attracted to is usually a death sentence for a relationship. And a sure fire way to ensure I happiness on one or both ends
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:21 PM
–

That's fine👍
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:18 PM
1

I mean you just goalpost shifted. No Passion doesn't mean unhappy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:12 PM
–

What's unethical non-monogamy look like? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 03:58 PM
–

Unlikable as a trait of a person. Is not the same as being disliked by a person. I'd consider someone unlikable to be someone who's generally a repellent to others. And typically that person is doing something wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 03:51 PM
–

Being disliked is different from being unlikable. Like that implies there is nothing to make yourself appealing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 03:45 PM
1

Women that are 2s and 3s only even have a shot bc men are more willing to settling. It's never the thing any man wants. That's almost as bad
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:11 PM
0

I mean women on women violence is rather than. Female on male violence. Which is still rather than male on female violence. Which is rather than male on male violence. The reality is that bad things occur but not every shitty phenomenon that occurs is an entire crisis worthy of a movement. At a time the complaints of women were really valid or voting rights etc. I mean the FBI last year found multiple GC each 70k strong of men coordinating the grapes of their closest female relatives and strange…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:18 PM
1

That being said. Dating for looks is shallow. Dating for money is shallow but it doesn't matter if you're upfront. The only moral wrong is if you aren't honest or are being coercive. But if we want to be technical. Between money and looks you only really NEED one to survive. Acquiring resources is never shallow if we wanna be really technical.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 09:23 PM
2

I mean yes but the debate and discussion tabs exists for a reason. Debates aren't even always the exclusively had to change minds. Even if that's the formal reason of why you're taught to debate. In reality, most people don't change minds via debates. It's just clashing ideals. She's not a gold digger if she's not dating. You're now switching to another reason to simply be upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 09:21 PM
1

Infact not even close. Like not valuing someone as a romantic partner is just not the same as lacking empathy for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:44 PM
1

Not the same as no empathy btw
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:36 PM
1

A little disagreement it's not hard to be stoic and in touch with your emotions. This comes from a failed understanding of stoicism. It's not just a trait it is an entire philosophy that comes from Greek antiquity. Read meditations by Marcus Aurelius. It's not about repressing emotions or not feeling them more than it is about understanding their weight and when and when not to engage them. And also acknowledging when your emotions aren't allat. It's not avoiding or suppressing them. To be a pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:31 PM
1

No comment. Bc there isn't a real correlation. Physical traits don't inform aggression, not directly, anyway. In fact, competitiveness as a trait isn't even black and white. Competition with friends is not as intense as with enemies. And at times maybe be completely absent for someone s/he doesn't inherently view as competition. If a man can alter the levels of competitiveness he exhibits appropriately then I don't see why competitiveness necessarily means lower empathy levels especially towards…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:22 PM
1

I can say! It depends no one looks at an abuser and go GEEZ GREAT. Most abusers aren’t stupid. People hide their intentions. Most abusers hide until that person is too emotionally ensnared to leave. If you can accept that you’re not omniscience then there is someone who can always outsmart and manipulate you. Also abusers choose people who are prone to being accepting of the behavior usually due to conditioning from abusive childhoods. You could say it’s their fault for having. The very natural …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:00 PM
1

ADHD ppl are an example. We are actually minimum 7years behind on emotional development bs the avg person. It’s why emo disregulation is big in adhd. And other cognitive functions too
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:54 PM
–

I like ice cream but only one or two flavors otherwise I won't eat it. Moose tracks and strawberry.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 11:10 PM
3

It does have to be normal and healthy. Happiness is a part of that equation. Since humans, probably not you, are emotional beings. They function best when happy and satisfied, thats when they'll do best for the kids. Its also just plainly true that co-parenting can be a better dynamic that parents who are miserable together. Or a good single parent vs toxic couple. Universally better outcomes. I could go out of my and probably go find afew decent studies on it. You're not the right option becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:40 PM
3

i mean. "like you" has no value as anything really. "not leaving the kids" is a general thing. Not leaving the kids is nice but that doesn't mean you'll be good help at raising them. a majority of households have mothers doing most of the child rearing. and most of these mothers are disenchanted with that. most these ladies work too. Not only that but "like you" could mean anything. infact you in particular, I wouldnt trust. ASPD and im assuming the name is no lie. you're definitely not ideal fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:10 PM
1

Usually. But def not to the extremes ppl say in this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 10:52 PM
1

Women who are okay with that are never okay for any long period of time. The smoker jobless guys are usually just placeholders. Or the woman in question is just as sucky. Like bro if u been looking for a job for 10 months. You definitely haven't been putting in 20 applications a day or anything of the like. Bc stores and fastfood have so many turn overs you could get something. Ur not making an active attempt n it's probably because of the addiction you claim you don't have. A common trope of th…
/r/seduction23/03/25 03:35 PM
1

The issue with this is that korea intergender dynamics and western intergender dyanmics are different. In korea you can get stories like 40 boys blackmailing a girl into being a fucktoy for the group and only 3 out of them get arrested. The rest live happy families with money and success. The Miryang Gang rape. This type of thing happens quite abit in korea. Maybe not of this level but all of the people who get found out talking about jt like a locker room type of thing. Its a cultural there. Yo…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter