Cyclamate_Soda Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I'm An Anti-Feminist Femboy, Am I Welcomed Here? The MRM is for everybody. Welcome!	/r/AntiFeminists	25/08/22 02:00 AM
0	Causal Misandry: Seixsm against men is okay Feminists have no institutional power? You’re the king of wishful thinking!	/r/AntiFeminists	24/08/22 07:09 PM
3	Causal Misandry: Seixsm against men is okay Yes. Ideologies that ignore the individual are dangerous.	/r/AntiFeminists	24/08/22 07:01 PM
2	Causal Misandry: Seixsm against men is okay Dark Knight unfortunately lost his debate with Saoirse O because he acquiesced to the narrative of patriarch theory, i.e., “…women have been oppressed by most of society for thousands of years.” This narrative is false because it doesn’t acknowledge that human society has always been constructed for the protection and benefit of women and children. It unfairly ignores the sacrifices—often of life itself—that have always been expected of men for the benefit of women. Women, mainly through sexual …	/r/AntiFeminists	24/08/22 06:57 PM
7	woke up to see this garbage first thing Don’t fuck that bitch. I certainly wouldn’t. Don’t stick your dick in crazy!	/r/AntiFeminists	23/08/22 07:01 PM
6	woke up to see this garbage first thing I love how this idiot characterizes anyone who calls her out on her sexism as “alt-right”. This is classic projection. It’s nauseating.	/r/AntiFeminists	23/08/22 06:56 PM
2	As long as we harm you a little bit less, misandry is good. Well put.	/r/AntiFeminists	15/08/22 09:54 PM
14	As long as we harm you a little bit less, misandry is good. Yes. Feminists verbally (and sometimes physically) punch men in the face and then blame patriarchy for making them bleed. Along with the classic bait-and-switch, this kind of gaslighting is a favorite tactic among feminists.	/r/AntiFeminists	15/08/22 09:51 PM
1	Why do so many women hate men ??? About 22k subscribers to this Men hating subReddit The appreciation of irony requires intelligence and a sense of humor, something clearly lacking in misandrous feminists.	/r/AntiFeminists	25/07/22 07:47 PM
30	Many men nowadays don't want to date and avoid marriage because they don't want to lose their money and assets and they are afraid of having to pay child support and being able to go to jail if they do not pay it But women are still hypergamous, even if they are outearning men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/05/22 02:38 AM
1	I hate how they go to comfort the woman who literally SPIT on a man minding his own business Fair enough.	/r/AntiFeminists	31/03/22 10:31 PM
-2	I hate how they go to comfort the woman who literally SPIT on a man minding his own business Fuсk оff with that.	/r/AntiFeminists	14/03/22 12:21 AM
12	I hate how they go to comfort the woman who literally SPIT on a man minding his own business A gentleman doesn’t reciprocate the slap, but only the most abject of simps respects her for abusing him.	/r/AntiFeminists	14/03/22 12:20 AM
3	Instead of glorifying or demonizing "traditional masculinity", why don't we celebrate multiple masculinities? “Sensitive men” is an idea older than “multiple masculinities”, but I see what you’re getting at. Agreed.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 09:52 PM
0	Instead of glorifying or demonizing "traditional masculinity", why don't we celebrate multiple masculinities? I’m not arguing for censorship; I’m saying that this is not a new idea. It’s literally Steinem’s idea, and her ilk would seize on this and prevent the discourse from going in directions that contravene their narrative.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 09:45 PM
3	Instead of glorifying or demonizing "traditional masculinity", why don't we celebrate multiple masculinities? Okay, how would you prevent the discourse from being coöpted?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 09:39 PM
5	What has feminism taught you? Why not let the criminal justice system handle these cases?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 07:23 AM
3	What has feminism taught you? I’m not saying it doesn’t exist within the MRM, but I haven’t noticed any of the purportedly universal racial hatred there that you describe. Are there MRAs who have specifically trivialized the issue of vigilantism against black men? Has Tommy Sotomayor done this? Please enlighten me. I’m not a fan of Trump, but he has quietly withdrawn the mandate of the infamous “dear colleague” letter stating that colleges would no longer receive federal funding if they didn’t take the law into their own han…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 06:56 AM
1	Instead of glorifying or demonizing "traditional masculinity", why don't we celebrate multiple masculinities? The idea of there being “multiple masculinities” is an idea that Gloria Steinem has been pushing since the 1990s. I don’t think this is the route you want to take if you want to steer away from identity politics. Feminists in Steinem’s mold will take over from your suggestion and proceed to commandeer the discourse.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/01/20 06:11 AM
2	Does anyone here dispute the assertion that "significant misandry is easily found in the output of mainstream modern academic feminism" “Even” in the more highbrow academic circles? Especially in the more highbrow academic circles!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/01/20 05:21 AM
1	Let's make a list of resources I gather that John The Other is too conservative a source for this subreddit. Still, I might recommend his rants from the early days of A Voice for Men Radio. He has the gift of eloquently articulating the seemingly ineffable, and in that capacity is worthy of emulation.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/01/20 04:48 AM
1	"Creepiness" is more of a predictor of social undesirability than of danger/threat level. In the context of criticizing someone’s actions, the two words are very different. But this is certainly not the only context in which “creep” is used. “Creep” has become a gendered slur, and it is used to dehumanize and target. It’s used to express hate, and women have it at their disposal in much the same way that white women had the n-word at their disposal at the turn of the twentieth century: to target a man, based on his appearance, for violence from white knights. Thank God most women don…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/01/20 04:00 AM
1	"Creepiness" is more of a predictor of social undesirability than of danger/threat level. It wasn’t my intention to trivialize racism with my post; it was my intention to show that “creep” is a word that has visceral connotations many ideologues and blue-pilled people choose to ignore—and those connotations mimic those of the justly infamous n-word. My point was that we should be careful when using it. It’s a dangerous word to use casually, and we need to consider why. I thought that here of all places that would be clearly understood. How disappointing.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/01/20 03:40 AM
1	"Creepiness" is more of a predictor of social undesirability than of danger/threat level. And the reason this is a ridiculous comparison is...? One label uses race to scapegoat and target; the other uses gender. True, there are men (and women) who really are creepy, but that doesn’t mean that the word “creep” isn’t used to incite mob violence against an innocent target. I’ve seen it happen.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/01/20 12:58 AM
18	"Society will move forward when Fatherhood is respected" that's what's written on this poster...it's a campain by a French consevative/catholic group. Feminists here in Paris are fuming over this, including the socialist mayor, who wants all the posters removed from the city !! If I remember correctly, Germaine Greer in The Female Eunuch wrote glowingly that women get an erotic charge out of getting men to fight each other. Perhaps male friendships get in the way of a good wank?	/r/MGTOW	18/01/20 11:21 AM
1	"Creepiness" is more of a predictor of social undesirability than of danger/threat level. “Creep” is the new “nigger”. Using it is a socially acceptable way for women to compel proxy violence against men they so designate.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/01/20 09:16 AM
2	How come when I wear these shirts I have to talk to a judge again? HAWT!	/r/MGTOW	18/01/20 06:21 AM
5	"Society will move forward when Fatherhood is respected" that's what's written on this poster...it's a campain by a French consevative/catholic group. Feminists here in Paris are fuming over this, including the socialist mayor, who wants all the posters removed from the city !! French, like all Romance languages, has grammatical gender. “La” is the feminine definite article. Abstract nouns ending in “-ité” or “-été” are feminine.	/r/MGTOW	18/01/20 06:02 AM
1	"Society will move forward when Fatherhood is respected" that's what's written on this poster...it's a campain by a French consevative/catholic group. Feminists here in Paris are fuming over this, including the socialist mayor, who wants all the posters removed from the city !! “Mais la paternité n’est pas progressiste!” What are progressives progressing toward? Alexandr Solzhenitsyn has a good answer to that question.	/r/MGTOW	18/01/20 05:59 AM
6	[CMV] Mainstream recognition and acceptance of female hypergamy (as TRP sees it) is inevitable and will happen in the next 20 years. I’d be more open to what you’re saying if you didn’t imply malice on my part. All I’m saying is that I don’t believe that gender differences are one hundred percent socially constructed; instead, they are in part biologically based. Hypergamy is part of that biological expression in women. There are masculine traits that can be problematic as well. There’s no need to sex shame over a refusal to believe a false but comforting narrative.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/20 11:46 AM
7	[CMV] Mainstream recognition and acceptance of female hypergamy (as TRP sees it) is inevitable and will happen in the next 20 years. Don’t try that shit with me. I never uttered any of the aforementioned quotes, so don’t you dare attribute them to me. Yes, women are hypergamous. I know, the truth hurts.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/20 11:23 AM
2	[CMV] Mainstream recognition and acceptance of female hypergamy (as TRP sees it) is inevitable and will happen in the next 20 years. And the strict social constructionist types in the mold of Judith Butler and her ilk will indefatigably try to construct new barriers. You know the types. They’re firmly entrenched in universities, and their influence has spilled into mainstream media and culture. The true believers really are blind to intersexual dynamics; the others defer to the party line and go along to get along in a totalitarian environment.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/20 06:31 AM
11	[CMV] Mainstream recognition and acceptance of female hypergamy (as TRP sees it) is inevitable and will happen in the next 20 years. I’m tired of this kind of shaming language. Hypergamy is tendency for women to prefer men of higher social and economic status than their own. It’s a product of humankind’s evolutionary heritage, and by and large it serves a useful function. Acknowledging that hypergamy exists and rejecting the strict social constructionist narrative about human sexuality now ascendant in academia and the mainstream media don’t make a man a misogynist or a Nice Guy™.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/20 06:19 AM
4	From swiggy's office in Kochi, India (Swiggy is India's largest online food ordering and delivery platform) We desperately need this campaign in the States.	/r/MensRights	13/01/20 03:22 AM