TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cyridius Archive

View 3 posts and 279 comments by Cyridius on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

And so what if they don't "culturally assimilate"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:28 PM
3

This is what you get for going on Tumblr. A lot of people say "such and such a website is filled with shit it's so bad omg" but it's not really, they're just being hyperbolic. No, literally, I've never seen such a shitty website(From the ground up, in every single aspect) before in my life. People who use it are masochistic in nature and deserve to be angered by such idiocy.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:27 AM
8

I absolutely agree. It's a batshit crazy piece of shit dad and a weak, lying, piece of shit daughter. Nothing more to see here.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:55 PM
23

It's like pointing out differences between races. They exist, but it a'int PC.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:23 PM
2

Not that I disagree, but can I have some example cases just so we're not all talking out our ass here?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:28 AM
-1

14 years definitely is not too much. You're talking as if a "forced abortion" is a trivial matter. He de facto poisoned her for years and prevented her from conceiving. This is in the same neighborhood about lying about being on the pill in the first place but on a much longer scale.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:26 AM
1

These are all your words. You're the only one saying the man had it coming and deserved it. Sounds like you're victim blaming.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:16 PM
1

So according to your analogy, women are raped because they ask for it like and are as retarded as, the man in your story. Your words, not mine. You're totally missing the point.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:36 AM
3

Except a rapist doesn't run 80 miles per hour in a metal box of death. Saying being run over by a car and being raped is the same is moronic. Just because they both have malicious intent doesn't mean they're identical or even comparable. If I had a gun and shot you, would it be the same as having a knife and stabbing you? Motive and intent may be the same, but the method is entirely different. Let's give you a scenario. I'm a very affluent businessman. I wear a 10,000 dollar tuxedo, I drive arou…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:39 AM
-3

What happened to discussion? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you people. Jerk yourselves off more. He asked a simple question. Someone made a claim that "Most of X thing are like Y". The automatic response for any person with any kind of critical or objective thinking would be "How do you know that?" If you're absolutely unable to defend your position, then your position holds absolutely no weight and should be disregarded for the steaming pile of shit it is. So, yes, his comment holds va…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:05 PM
10

And you're absolutely right. /r/MensRights is absolutely not immune to the ailments of many subreddits - we often profess unbiased and fair argument and then we get cases like yours where you happened to interrupt a circlejerk with a legitimate question and it gets downvoted to hell. With that said, your question is really kind of a stupid one. Where social movements are concerned, there is no metric for "most". We don't know what "most" is, we don't even know how many exist. So when people say …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:01 PM
0

One would think legitimate questions add to the discussion.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:57 PM
4

What's annoying is that the majority of Feminists are blatant and self-righteous. We're all hypocrites and many of us pick and choose what we want to believe. What makes the "typical" feminist so fucking annoying however is that they're on some sort of Holy Crusade and behave as if everything they do is right and everything they do is the only way, and then proceed to ignore their own words.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:56 PM
0

Yes. But people already know the possibility of being shot, why put bodyarmor on them? If they knew the risks there's no need to reduce the possibility of something bad happening, right?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:32 AM
0

By that logic why do we give people bodyarmor?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:26 AM
-2

Exclude women from what? The horrible possibility of being raped? Otherwise they're not being excluded from anything except the boys' club.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:16 AM
1

It gets significantly lessened.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:15 AM
-4

What's that got to do with anything? We're discussion female rape here, an entirely separate issue. They're two different problems which require entirely different solutions. You're acting as if they're the same when they're not. One is not worse than the other, they're just two entirely different problems due to the nature of the issue.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:20 AM
-7

Unfortunately you cannot combat that as easily as you can combat this. You're bringing up a different problem that isn't under discussion.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:16 AM
-2

Who's talking shit now? Nobody said anything about men being incapable of serving without raping women. You're ten times less likely to be raped in the military than you are as a civilian, according to Foreign Policy, who I trust to be factual. But the fact of the matter is that rape does occur. It does kill morale of the unit. What more do you want me to tell you?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:16 AM
-7

Oh wait, no it doesn't happen. This isn't World War II anymore where we're landing on beaches under German gunfire. Even if it was, trying to equate comrardarie and military bonds to a romantic relationship is beyond retarded.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:12 AM
-19

Regardless of their existence they're not the typical military person(or typical person full stop) and they are a minority. Male and Female is an entire different ballpark.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:15 PM
-16

It's not just about being physically capable. There's sexual interaction which does compromise the group. If you have romantic feelings for people in your unit it can fuck people over big time when it comes to making decisions - especially at the officer level. We need to remember as well that the military isn't full of nice and caring guys. There are a lot of rough people there and rape absolutely destroys morale for everybody. Things would all work better if both genders would be segregated in…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:03 PM
1

They aren't at all. Marines are on the same level as the Army. Force Recon is the equivalent to the Rangers. In reality there's nothing the Army cannot do that the Marines can do, and they have better equipment while they're at it. People just buy into Marine propaganda that they're some sort of special force, and that shit goes into top gear all throughout training.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 10:55 PM
-50

The military has become a joke. Females shouldn't serve on the front lines with men - they can serve on the front lines with other women and let that be that. Segregate the units. You need to be able to depend on your unit if you're in combat and if you can't because one's a woman and isn't physically fit enough to carry the MG or drag your injured body to safety, then it comprises the entire unit's integrity. Not to mention a whole host of other reasons as to why the women weren't allowed in th…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 10:53 PM
5

No, I'm a general realist. I also find the OP's post stupid because it ignores the fact that men as a demographic have a much higher crime rate than women. Stats need context to have meaning. The problem with you, and people like you, is that you see a statistic and instead of putting it in hard context you just bitch out and start trying to find excuses. It's possible blacks are put away in more proportion than the statistics justify, but because of people like you - and your very first post pr…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:38 AM
9

TIL Facts are racist. You sure got me!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:31 AM
7

It's "so fucking lol" to me because 3% of the population - young black male - commit 52% of the nation's crimes. It's not really surprising, given that they have double the unemployment rate as the next highest demographic.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:29 AM
2

Statistics like this do nothing but water down legitimate complaints and create one sided, false arguments - this kind of infographic is something you'd see a typically stupid Feminist group put up. Go, look at that, then go and compare the crime rates, please.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:28 AM
8

Maybe not a power user, power-mod and general hypocrite would probably a more fitting description.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:01 PM
9

/u/TheIdesOfLight is a Reddit power-user and mega discriminator. Hates gender equality with a passion. Just look at that post history. The first thing I saw was /r/SubredditDrama about MRAs. Need more be said? Just a plain out loser, and if that person is a moderator for a sub, and other moderators agree with that person, then that sub is for losers, too. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:34 PM
5

Yes but the prerequisites for 1st and 2nd degree are different. One is generally easier to prove than the other.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 07:29 PM
1

165... Privilege = Checked.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:00 AM
–

Well second degree murder still puts her away for a pretty long time, if the system is working. 25-life. When we get right down to it, it's how the justice system is. If there's no proof, there's no conviction, and you need to be convincing to get 1st degree, which is why it's rarely pursued.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:57 AM
1

The point he's making is that the act of marriage in of itself does not make you live longer. It's pedantic.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:53 AM
2

I don't think you read it correctly.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:14 AM
-2

I stand corrected. Well done to our Northern Irish cousins. I just "know" from my ear to the ground that we generally do not buy into Feminist ideals, such as victim blaming, rape culture and patriarchy. As a side note; Where bouts you from?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:15 AM
-4

Ireland's almost always done this shit right. We never bought into liberalism and feminism, especially the current wave. We're pretty solid on equality all around, and because we have such a small population, dissenting opinions are much easier to get out.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 02:17 AM
2

Precisely. Women do have agency and this is what this is about. As for non-violent rape(i.e. drunk sex), I prefer not to comment on it because the situations are so varied that any statement will have exception and be controversial.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:08 PM
2

Rape is done with intent but it's not like they don't have a set of prerequisites or conditions for their target; I.E. If a rapist were to see two women walking down the street, one who's blind drunk and one who's dead sober, both equally attractive, which do you think he'll take? So while it's done with intention that doesn't mean you don't take precautions. You're responsible for yourself.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:12 PM
16

It's about rape-apology and rape-culture. Feminists do not believe in taking safety precautions. If someone runs out into the road with high speed traffic, they get hit by a car. The Feminist-equivalent reaction would be "Why should I have to check both ways? They should just stop." The ad is to highlight the logic behind this sort of thought, in that people should be responsible for their own safety in that they take as many precautions as possible. There's a difference between Rape and being h…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 03:29 PM
–

It's pretty obvious what "rape-culture" is. It's a society in which rape is not stigmatized, discouraged, and punished sufficiently, where women are seen as an object to be used. I.E. A myth.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 03:20 PM
-2

There are a lot of terrible women's soccer teams out there, the bar isn't very high, let's put away the PC crap and be honest here, but a spectacle is a spectacle. A lot of people like watching two lesser teams face off because there's a lot more mistakes and therefore more drama and it's more intense. You can enjoy watching it, but putting the athleticism aside, the skill level is still pretty amateur.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 12:25 PM
14

That's correct. Most male dominated workplaces are very keen to have women on board and will pay more to have them. That even manifests itself in education where they encourage girls to go into male dominated fields.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:34 PM
0

It's pretty obvious she made a deal to sell him out.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:37 PM
4

You're talking as if Insurance is a public service and not a for-profit business. Vasectomies are safer and more common, hence charge for them. A pregnant mother/baby costs far more money in the long run than her surgery costs, so encourage them to get sterilized by making it fully covered. It's not a case of discrimination here, it's smart business.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:18 PM
8

Anyone remember "failure" turning up George Bush?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:18 PM
3

I'm not advocating anything. Simply stating what's happening.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:46 PM
7

You wouldn't be very happy if people who though MR was a sham came here spamming posts, would you? They do that all the time. Life moves on.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:28 PM
3

Damn, you're so alpha right now. Can I be your bitch?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:59 PM
0

America is not a signatory of the domestic Geneva convention. Not a violation in this case. They don't follow the normal one as it is, anyhow.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:58 PM
11

Except that threats have appeared in their girl's room before, it could easily stand to reason a girl walked into the boy's bathroom to do this, or a boy was doing it all along. Regardless of that, group punishment of an entire demographic with no actual knowledge of the perpetrator is absurd. "Looks like a double homicide. Lou, go round up every black male in a 3 kilometer radius, we're taking them in for questioning"
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:57 PM
2

Yes but it's a stretch to assume that's a symbol for all men as opposed to simply Russel Brand. You can see anything and make any interpretation out of it you want... I think I'd rather just look at her videos with he clearly stated opinions in mind when I look for interpretations.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:35 PM
6

You're behaving like a Feminist. Instead of simply dismissing his very valid points out of hand "Jus cuz" you could adjust your rigid, inflexible, and rather far fetched interpretations to a more realistic and human approach. You're trying to break her work down as if there's only one way to look at them; Your way. Look up Anita Sarkeesian's "Tropes vs. Feminism", you're exactly like her.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:32 PM
13

Sometimes the left deserves to be bashed. They're responsible for tonnes of the issues this movement faces.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:24 PM
5

Hsssst, you've brought the great eye upon us!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:43 PM
-7

If you browse reddit, it's not a particularly accurate representation. I still found the comic quite amusing. The art's quite good.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:35 PM
8

Privilege, checked!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:34 PM
6

No, (s)he implied that women asking for equality is some sort of great offense. There is zero strawman in my argument. Anything short of 50% is "under representation". We can talk all day that women are under represented but bringing it up as a sign of immense ignorance due to willful ignoring of the reasons behind that so-called under representation. And on top of that, stating a gender is under represented is anti-equality. It implies that if one gender has many people in a position, then they…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:11 PM
2

Yeah, there are subreddits out there that specifically come here and repost the threads for brigading.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:42 PM
12

Great strawman argument, asshole. What's your suggestion? Force a 50/50 representation in government? That's sexist, men and women deserve equal chance to get a position based on their merits alone, not their gender. The CEO and Government myths are just like the Wage Gap. A myth. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:41 PM
6

Why you're getting downvoted; Using the word "Privileged" Coming onto a male dominated subreddit and saying "YOU GUYS DON'T UNDERSTAND FEMINISM(Side note: Most people are here specifically because they do understand Feminism) YOU'VE GOT MALE PRIVILEGE" - not the best idea.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:39 PM
8

Yes. Too bad the subreddit was ASK Feminism.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:37 PM
0

Same.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:36 PM
-1

Universities are a breeding ground for Feminism. Everybody feels that they're the next social activist that's gonna change the world. What better cause than gender equality? Throw a tonne of posters around, launch a few genders studies courses, have a few guest speakers, and there you go. A nice couple hundred people indoctrinated. It's not far fetched to believe an SU is run by Feminists because generally those in SUs are proactive people that are around college making noise and being parts of …
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:31 PM
-4

I can agree in part, but you're totally ignoring the bulk of my argument and are focusing on my comments about clothing - which I can admit are flawed due to the issues raised by your statement. With that said, you can look fashionable and outgoing without wearing "nothing". You can be attractive and ready to go out, without wearing skimpy clothing. You can look good without looking "slutty"(For lack of a better word, I think you know what I mean). The point I'm trying to make, is that when you …
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:46 PM
0

"You have been banned from /r/Feminism" A message I received today. That is why one cannot go and find out. Feminists are often(Not always) unreceptive of contradicting arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:52 PM
4

I literally laughed my ass off when I read that. Wasn't going back there anyway!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:49 PM
36

OK, so seeing as my OP may not have been all that clear; If you follow the second link, it links you to thread in question(I swapped www. with np. - thanks for the tip). It was some stupid image macro about rape prevention, and I disagreed with it. 5,600 characters later, I had this posted; "Please, stop using strawman arguments to make a bad point. When people say "If you dress in such and such a way you are increasing your chance of getting raped" it is common sense. Let's just take a moment h…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:05 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:02 PM
2

Whoever made that has an attitude problem.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:28 PM
1

I edited my post just as you replied.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:34 PM
20

10.8.6 is worse. Screenshot courtesy of /u/Remerez
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:31 PM
2

Title is misleading but point still stands. Rape, rapist, makes little difference when it's clear what the intention is. Whore: A woman who sells sex See: prostitute Slut: A woman who has sex liberally
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:28 PM
3

That guy is obviously taking the piss.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 05:07 PM
6

Can't be libel if you're not referring to a specific person or entity. Has to be an individual, group, product, nation, religion, government or business. We don't really fit into that. If someone is referring to say, /r/MensRights and say we promote such and such a thing, then it's libel because it's referring to a specific group of people.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 05:06 PM
3

Bans do happen.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 05:05 PM
1

It's a difficult subject to call someone on. You can't just say "prove it". It's not a tangible subject, it's a philosophical stance. This is the problem with all gender based movements, including ours. Unless you're making a statistical claim (X% of rape victims are men), it cannot be proven. The best you can do is pick out the holes in logic. They can say "It's about male power fantasy" and you can counter "It's a female submissive fantasy", and then go back and forth until you get to the core…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:53 PM
25

If you were fearless/stupid, you might give her shit for raising a rapist woman hater who wants to enslave women. I enjoy trolling too much for my own good.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:45 AM
4

That same argument could be applied to everybody except those with literal deficiencies in their brain structure. I, for one, quantify intelligence in the ability to critically think and question.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:29 PM
56

I know you think we're all idiots Because you are. I went onto that subreddit, made a post saying "Hey, what's this subreddit about and let's talk about our differences!" Every single comment I made got downvoted. Then I got banned. The terms used on me were; Woman hater Holocaust denier(LOL) Misogynist and assorted other things. Your subreddit and the people who inhabit it are all colossal pieces of shit. I don't like it and I don't like you. If you think you're "helping anyone", you arrogant p…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:26 PM
14

Yeah, that "something" would be to close us down and ban everybody.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:22 PM
–

The sole purpose of that subreddit is to link to use and downvote brigade. That's literally it. It's painfully obvious the Admins are rabid feminist fanboys/girls. They may not share in their views directly, but they'll do anything to facilitate their aggressive attitudes and disruption of everybody else while putting everyone who isn't them down.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:21 PM
1

The Guardian is probably one of the best ones. It depends on what you're looking for. If you want any information on domestic affairs in the US, they're all bad and you're best off looking for other forms of media. For foreign affairs, CNN, RT, BBC, and Al Jazeera are quite good. Al Jazeera is a bit biased in favor of Islamist groups, so while their reporting is still very good, you should take some of their statements with a grain of salt(Like for eg. "200 people killed today by army in Egypt" …
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:14 PM
3

It's the Huff Post. It's the largest shit eating liberal media website there is. It has the credibility of Fox or the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:52 PM
5

There we would be no point, SRS only links to other submissions.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:18 AM
3

But but but Cosmo wrote up a piece that was good for us a while back!
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:06 AM
-11

Seriously. Cosmo said this? There goes our credibility.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:50 PM
1

Whenever someone uses the word "misogyny" in an argument with me I just shit all over them by accusing them of belittling the word and being against women's rights through dilution of the meaning of the word, allowing for oppression of women.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:41 PM
2

You're taking your agenda and imprinting it onto the comic. If you want it to symbolize men oppressing others, then that's what it means. That's what this comic is about. That oppression doesn't have a face, and it cannot be quantified. Everybody is in this whole deal together, and if we can't find common ground with eachother, then it just doesn't work in the long run.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 11:23 PM
67

Except that a convicted pedophile now has custody of a child. I still can't get my head around this. Let's forget the whole rape and child support for a moment. The judge gave a pedophile custody of a child. Just let that soak in for a moment. What kind of crack is that person smoking? It must be some really serious shit. What does it take for a judge to lose their job, again?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:38 PM
7

Were you denied because you were a man?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:36 PM
-2

Are you legitimately blind? No, I suppose you're not, as you can type and read. You seem to have very limited understanding of English. Are you from a non-native English country? Maybe dyslexic?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:39 PM
2

The difference between 50 years and 1500+
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:07 PM
0

I think Adolf should be allowed, but naming your son "Adolf Hitler" is pretty ridiculous, and obviously specific.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:44 PM
6

There's a small matter of context. There's one thing to have a second name Hitler, it's another thing to call your son Adolf, it's another thing to walk around in Nazi uniform, and to name your son "Adolf Hitler" just to let people know that he's named specifically after a genocidal mass murderer.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:45 PM
9

Why? Is it because of the hate? Because kids called Adolf or Hitler or some variation of a well known Nazi name will get shit their entire life because people are biased and ignorant. If so, would you want to apply these same laws to the millions of Americans who openly and loudly proclaim intent to torture pedophiles? If they were in a position to do so, yes. If someone is a prison guard and says "I'm gonna fucking murder that piece of shit as soon as he gets in here", then he should be arreste…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:40 PM
3

I just feel sorry for the kids. I'm very liberal when it comes to the ideas of letting people believe what they want and express what they want, but there are boundaries that should never be crossed.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:10 PM
4

Yes and no. Guys have a choice in that they can not put their dick in crazy. But a guy doesn't hold responsibility for the outcome if she specifically tells you before sex "If I get pregnant I'll have an abortion" or "I don't want kids" or something along those lines. If you have sex, she gets pregnant, and she goes back on that, then it isn't really your fault. It's basically rape, you've withdrawn consent part way through the act and you shouldn't held liable for what happens thereafter. It's …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:41 PM
3

I agree wholeheartedly. Having fun shouldn't be a crime(Even if it is a bit creepy...). But this is the bias of the justice system towards women.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:33 PM
0

What is this, the '70s? That's the problem with Feminism. They're stuck in the past.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:52 AM
1

Woooooooow
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:47 AM
2

I think what we should be looking at here is not that the boy is being groped - as wrong as that may be in certain cases - it's the reaction if it was a girl. I see no problem with this picture, it's creepy and I wouldn't wanna be friends with that woman, but the kid's having a laugh. What aggravates me is if you change the genders. Girl's having just as much fun as the boy, it's all a bit of a laugh for the camera, and then the man gets hit with child molestation. That is what is wrong here.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:46 AM
1

See if that stands up in court when you do that to a girl and get charged with child molestation.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:42 AM
4

Kind of ironic, considering what subreddit you're in.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:30 PM
0

And thank you for your generalizations.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:39 AM
-2

It's a piece of clothing.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:31 PM
19

Did you read the OP? A woman forwarded it on to HR to file complaint. Please take your double standards out of here.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:28 PM
10

Document every single little bit of information. Get written statements from HR asking what they intend to do about this incident. I would also ask /r/legaladvice about the legal liability of your company in such a situation. Read up a bit on it there, if your company refuses to do anything, call your lawyer and take it from there.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:27 PM
1

/u/angry_dave has the right of it. Just be a bit sarcastic, take it a step further as if they had made some sort of joke. But you should talk to her about what she thinks about it, too.
/r/seduction21/06/13 09:51 PM
11

It's an article is how. He didn't personally find her information and post it.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:23 AM
0

That's a pretty strange and oddly specific question.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:20 AM
2

It's Urban Dictionary...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:45 PM
1

It's much easier to believe yourself a better person than you are - we're all effected by that whether we realize it or not. Or as Feminists would say... Check your privilege.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:40 PM
3

Seeing as I'm an awful person, in these kinds of situations what I do is ask very straight forward questions and utterly ignore everything they say that doesn't relate to it. Example; "<feminist statement>" Reply: "Can men get raped?" "<avoids question>" Reply: "It's a yes or no question. Can men get raped?" Then after I finally get a response to that question, I move on. I also message all the guys I'm friends with with a link to the conversation so they can join me in shitting on her argument.…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 01:57 PM
10

Some lesbians are really just "political lesbians". They hate men because their personality is simply incompatible with a relationship(I.E. She's an asshole), so they find a woman who's the same as them and there you go. It's not that they are attracted to women, it's that they hate men so much they'll fuck women instead. Not saying it's the same as OP's "friends" but they're out there. Some other Lesbians spend so much time living on the internet(Read: Tumblr) they believe they're still in the …
/r/MensRights10/06/13 01:53 PM
4

They have strict alimony laws. Cases not involving domestic violence need to show 10+ years of marriage to qualify. Says to me there needs to be a history of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:44 AM
1

"Threatening"... kind of an understatement. Isn't this like the 3rd time this year someone's mailed Obama ricin?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:09 AM
0

Where'd you read that?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:07 AM
3

Wat
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:42 PM
3

Jesus christ why do you even bother anymore?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:41 PM
1

Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transgender I believe.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:41 PM
-2

That isn't what she's saying at all. She saying the people who make Feminism so central and important to their lives that their every behaviour is done with Feminism in mind and that they practically worship her because she was blessed with a vagina and a pair of tits are what turn her off. Basically, men so into Feminism that they make everything about Feminism. Which is reasonable. I don't make my every interaction with women I'm into about gender issues, that'd be a pretty quick way to bore t…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:30 AM
7

The "Tropes vs. Feminism" video genuinely killed off half of my brain cells. Not only were her arguments highly illogical(And very easy for anybody to turn against her), but she showed fundamental lack of knowledge of modern games... Anita Sarkeesian = Hypocrite, ignorant, and I dare say unintelligent. Edit; Imagine her playing Fallout. She'd probably have apoplexy when you kill a female raider.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:07 PM
1

That's true but irrelevant to the conversation at hand.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:40 AM
5

And it's an even larger generalization to say that lack of a male role model has little to no effect. The assumption that there will be another role model alternative to a parent there just ready for you is also pretty huge. As someone who had a more-or-less non-existant relationship with his father, I'm curious as to what vital influences I missed out on that negatively impacted where I've ended up today. I've not lived your life and I don't know what your life is like so I don't know.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:19 AM
10

Except people like teachers and other people's parents do not have the same connection to you as your own parent. They aren't raising you, they may not have any will to be your role model or anything of the sort, and a teacher-student relationship of this manner is exceedingly rare anyways, as teachers are meant to exist in a professional capacity. While you can have these, it's both rare and arguable less effective than your own parent.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:07 AM
3

Classes on anatomy don't teach you about the social aspects of your gender.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:01 AM
2

That's disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:50 AM
7

A "sexuality class"? First I've ever heard of it. You can't be taught as a replacement for a role model. That's why we have role models. People we observe, aspire to be or learn from, we learn the lesson ourselves through observation, through what goes through our heads. Not what whichever school system decides to indoctrinate us with.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:49 AM
20

Whether you like it or not, men and women behave differently and have different approaches to things. Having a male role model allows you to feel more comfortable in your gender, and it gives you perspective for when/if you are in that position, as a male adult/father.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:46 AM
7

Because we believe men should be treated the same as women, both in social regard and legal aspects. Manhood Academy is, what it is called. "MANHOOD" Academy. It advocates the manly man, the tough guy, the man > woman attitude. While it sometimes can have views that align to MRAs... a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:55 PM
18

They're not MRAs. Unlike Feminists, we openly condemn these types of people.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:22 PM
1

There is such a thing as Anarcho-Feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:09 PM
1

Most MRAs do not believe this to be true. That's a pretty bold(And incorrect) statement. The MRM is about assuring equal treatment of both men and women in modern day society. It's against certain biased policies that have been implemented into law, the general social attitude towards men in modern society(i.e. The bread winners, sole responsibility, soldiers, expendable etc.) and to try raise awareness for injustices towards men as a result of a gender-biased decision. The reason many MRAs may …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:59 AM
1

Read /u/idflaps's response to my comment
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:15 PM
2

I stand corrected
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:15 PM
2

Ofcourse, Western culture isn't perfect by far. But I don't think it can be contested that Western culture is definitely more liberal in their attitude towards people of different sexuality, religion and women.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:57 PM
3

The SPLC is an anti-freedom hate organization. Even the Federal government has distanced themselves from them. They deem any group which does not follow their political ideology as a hate group. They're a reputable as Sarah Palin.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:55 PM
3

The Middle-East is socially hundreds of years behind us. While they're catching up quickly, they still live in a society dominated by men. Both in that men take on all the responsibility, but they also have the social superiority. It's not to say men had easier lives. Hell, men have never had easier lives, they've just had more to work with than women and were never restricted in the same manner. I could be totally restricted and have an extremely easy life - but is that a good life? That is an …
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:48 PM
4

Yes, allowed to serve. Not forced to sign a blood oath at the age of 18. There are still dozens of countries that have forced military service for men.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:43 PM
3

Yeah, the SPLC is sure right to call us a hate group. Let's forget their ties to domestic terrorism and all that crap.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:41 PM
1

Such a reputable science...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:40 PM
4

The sad thing is this person's been on reddit for over a year. Not even a troll.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:38 PM
1

Not really. This is simple human strength. Women start off naturally weaker, but they build muscle the same way. They may have to weightlift for slightly longer in order to reach the same critical mass that a male does, but ultimately it isn't so drastically different.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:35 PM
0

That's because while MRA has more than it's fair share of retards, most people on Reddit seem pretty reasonable. And let's be honest here, how many MRA websites do you think TiA looks at?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:47 PM
19

Men cannot read your mind to know what you actually mean. Wait. I have it. Women are psychic. But they think we are too. But we're not. And they don't know that. No wonder we get called rapists after consensual sex! They were telepathically communicating the whole time, I'm just not far enough on the evolutionary chain to get it. Mah B.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:46 PM
10

I need the Men's Right Movement because... No means no But to Feminists when I say no it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:44 PM
8

God I wish I was gay sometimes... Don't be one of those people. And by that, I mean don't be one of those political homosexuals. Plenty of lesbians out there who are lesbians because they hate guys, not because they like women.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:41 PM
6

Too late.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:37 AM
0

The concept of this law is simply ridiculous in the first place. Statutory rape should be removed. If a minor isn't consenting, it's rape. Simple as. If two people are consenting it is not rape. It can be argued people in positions of power can abuse this(teachers etc.) but that would simply be rape aswell. This woman shouldn't be in jail, nor should any man or woman who falls victim to this law unjustly. Actually, I wouldn't say remove it, because there are ages where one is simply too young. B…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:04 PM
15

Summary; OP gets drunk, goes home with a man who is drunker than her(In her own words), who she is aware of having mental issues, has consensual sex with him, stops wanting sex half way through, he takes an alleged minute to stop, does not ejaculate, apologizes and lets her go home. Gets put in jail for 4 years for rape.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:28 PM
2

A non-existent stereotype.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:26 PM
1

It's probably because of retards like you. Seriously, every day the quality of the posting on this subreddit gets worse.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:59 AM
3

Men also make up 80% of the US Military.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:57 AM
-3

What has this video got to do with this Subreddit?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:56 AM
3

/r/legaladvice
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:54 AM
14

I don't think that GIF was really necessary...
/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:11 PM
1

I agree and disagree. The draft as a concept is horrible. However making it exclusive to men is discrimminatory to both genders - in that it excludes women from the military service but also forces men into it. What I have found funny is that for all the women that rallied against this policy, like for Vietnam, I believe there is only one that went and joined the army. As far as I'm concerned, if you have a problem with a draft system, go sign up. Nobody stops you.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 10:27 PM
1

Because many of the false-rape accusations don't even go to trial.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:56 PM
10

Absolutely not. There's a limit between sympathy to the victim and distorting the quality of justice. If the alleged victim cannot face the alleged accuser(Edit; Wrong world, alleged criminal, maybe?) in court in front of a jury, that takes out an extremely large part in the decision making process for the jury.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:52 PM
0

I've not seen the data /u/Sigil1 is referring to. But it's possible he may be referring to the fact that Men are statistically raped more than women. But that does not mean a woman raped a man. Statistically speaking, I believe about 80% of all rape crimes are committed by men, with men being the rape victim 60% of the time. My numbers may be well off though, as I don't have direct reference on hand.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:23 PM
2

Don't do a thing. It'll end badly for you. If you're serious then report her to the police. Otherwise, don't bother with half-ass solutions. Physical abuse is disgusting and criminal, but if you tolerate that - when you know better - then it's on you.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:20 PM
1

Did you just read that line and stop?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:32 AM
3

I disagree with the section of mra's that start immediately focusing on rape victims responsibility for being raped as soon as the topic comes up. Definitely. That disgusts me. Victims can't be blamed for rape. But, without sounding self-contradictory, if somebody was walking down a dark alleyway alone at midnight, well, they're kind of stupid. Again, however, it's not their fault that they were raped, but they didn't help themselves circumstantially.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:19 PM
3

Not really. People are responsible for themselves and should never expect to have people look after them. This is a simple fact of life. Whether you have a dozen friends there or not, you are never their responsibility. You should not over drink to the point where you have to be. However, a good friend will help another friend in times of need. Regardless of gender. However, this advertisement totally ignores helping men and instead focuses on women. Let me give you an anecdote; So I know this w…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:46 PM
1

It's still a fact, but only as a generality, not an absolute. No. You're utterly wrong. Firstly, you're assuming your (sexist) opinion is a fact. To be a fact it would have to take in a very large sample space of the demographic. You would then have to run long term studies on said sample and compare it to an equally large sample of males. We would then see the quality of work of middle aged women vs. the quality of work of men, and we'll see the rate of unwilling job loss amongst the two sample…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:40 PM
7

This isn't a good post and has nothing to do with anything. If you want to post stupid go to /r/MensRants
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:20 AM
1

No, when you generalize it is not a fact, it is a stereotype. All women are bad drivers. Men aren't as good at problem solving as women. This is text book sexism. All you need to do is substitute "middle aged women" with blacks or mexicans and it becomes and entirely unacceptable statement. Except that isn't acceptable either.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:18 AM
2

This kind of attitude it a left over from a pre-feminist era. When women were the home makers and didn't have the career prospects of men, more often than not the option was to just marry some guy and have him provide for you. That guy wasn't always gonna be perfect, and, well, it's human nature to try and change your spouse to suit your needs.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:15 AM
4

Also, this whole thing has exactly nothing to do with feminism. This is what happens when SubReddits become popular.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:10 AM
2

That's confirmation bias. It's also quite a sexist comment. How would you feel if I made that kind of generalization for men?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:07 AM
0

Nope, she was a high risk based on what she could potentially do. Intention is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:06 AM
2

Play dirty. No, really. Drag her name through the mud in any possible manner. When it gets right down to it, it's her or your kids.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:02 AM
10

What you imply by your post title is that in all of those scenarios the drunk girl should've just been left to be potentially raped...and if she was, whoops, it's her fault and she better take responsibility for it. No, the implication is that women can't look after themselves and make a correct judgement call, it also implies that men should not be looked after in the same situation. It also implies that all men are malicious in nature and have the intention of sexual assault. Also; when, in fa…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:27 AM
8

Posters like this are in general, stupid. Despite their intentions. Firstly, people are responsible for themselves, and should never expect anybody else to look after them. If they don't look after themselves, it is their own fault. This applies to everybody. Secondly, it implies that women are weak willed and need looking after. No thanks. Women can look after themselves just as well as men. Thirdly, it implies that all men are sexual predators. It also implies that all men are liars with an al…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:24 AM
1

Just put up the poster lololol YOLO But seriously, if you do it I will love you & give reddit gold. Please deliver OP. Edit; An added bonus(though not neccessary) is if you had a conversation with her while doing it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:47 AM
6

It's obvious that women are just more careful at work /s
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:26 PM
6

Could be a he. We don't know.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:01 PM
2

The 1 in 5 statistic is pretty inaccurate and is only in existence because rape was so loosely defined by the feminist that researched it. Many women that were included in that "1 in 5" insist they were not raped.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:00 PM
2

SHUT THE FUCK UP I'M READING FUCK FACE
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:22 PM
1

You know, somebody that angry all the time's gonna end up with an aneurism. That would almost be /r/JusticePorn worthy.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:21 PM
-3

Except mainstream feminism is basically /r/theredpill
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:13 PM
4

Wait... what? The... victim, he wasn't named. What is this madness?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:57 PM
2

Shhhh, there's a certain heavily influential group in modern society, which shall not be named, that frowns heavily upon such insinuations.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:54 PM
4

There are no government funded shelters for male victims of domestic violence. Good luck finding one.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:10 PM
12

I'm sorry but when people can't get a bed for the sake of somebody's convienience, people have to fucking "suck it up" and deal with it.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:10 PM
3

Can you expand more on this?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:12 AM
4

Kind of hard not to assume that. Because, you know, FEMinism. Kind of ironic this argument is being used, given the terms policeMAN and fireMAN were changed to police officer and fire fighter, because due to the masculine implications it made it difficult for women to see themselves in this position.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:11 AM
0

Your statement in of itself is a fallacy.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:08 AM
2

Not a big deal, never hurts to remind the people. The protest still sickens me. It's possible that this is the same video just on a different link.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:35 PM
5

This has been posted already numerous times.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:22 PM
2

Ideologically speaking, there is actually a Feminist subset of Anarchism.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:12 PM
1

What the hell did I just watch? Looks like a load of dikes trying to rape some random guy.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:56 PM
4

I know plenty of Muslim women. Some very beautiful ones. And they all choose to wear a Burqa. They all choose to wear the head scarf and cover themselves. It's part of their national and self-identity and I admire and respect that. That's why I get so extremely offended by Feminists that do such disrespectful offensive shit like protesting nude outside mosques. It's the epitome of intolerance, closed-mindedness and pure blatant ignorance, and only for freedom of expression I would see those wome…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:50 AM
22

I'm so glad I don't go to U of T. It seems like a Feminist filled shit hole.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:30 AM
4

I would hardly call this an outlier.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:49 PM
2

Men can't be objectified, clearly.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:48 PM
3

Yup, submitter of the year twice in a row.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:43 PM
1

I got a good chuckle, honestly.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:02 PM
17

I'm eagerly awaiting that day.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:57 PM
6

I don't see it as unfortunate at all! Hahaha
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:56 PM
24

Men are objectified just as much as women, how does nobody see this?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:55 PM
7

No. It's painfully obvious what the world view of men is. Culture is loaded with sexism. The only way to broaden that view point, or at least raise awareness of misandry, is to use the systems feminism put in place to combat this exact thing. Gender inequality is just that. Gender inequality. If we want to be treated fairly, we have to be proactive. We can't just sit back and moan about how such and such a thing is sexist against men, but hey, we can't complain about it because feminists have tr…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:29 PM
3

Everything is a fucking feminist issue these days. This is why sane people think feminism is a load of crap.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:25 PM
4

In a hearing with a Florida legislative committee trying to push a Bill requiring that babies that survive Abortion should be provided medical care by the abortion clinic, the feminist representative of Planned Parenthood says that they "believe that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman". The implications of this are clear; In the case of a botched abortion, women should be allowed to terminate a living child. The reason why Abortion is infact accepted in the first place is du…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:13 PM
1

And Germans have a lot to talk about the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:15 AM
2

/r/genderdebate ?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:27 PM
2

I dunno, like an /r/genderequality subreddit? Edit; Except that already exists, apparently.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:39 AM
1

I dunno, I think it was pretty passive-aggressive and that feminist he was discussing with did pretty well.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:37 AM
1

I think anybody should be able to post and comment, regardless of how radical their viewpoint is.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:30 AM
2

In history. Keyword. History. If you wanna live in the past, good for you. I choose to actually critically think and live in the present. Will I deny that there are certain positions which have a dominance of men over women? Nope. That's society for you. There are also certain positions that have a dominance of women over men. This is not a patriarchy. You are misusing the word. Fun fact, a society that doesn't have total equality != a patriarchy(Or matriarchy). Both sexes suffer discrimmination…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:28 AM
0

If you're horribly unhygenic it could benefit you. It also helps you last longer during sex, significantly so - but that's only due to the fact your most sensitive and pleasurable nerve endings were killed. But that's something that can be learned and practiced. I consider circumcision on par with mutilation. If it's self-inflicted, good for you, but I wouldn't cut off my daughter's clit at birth, personally.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:18 AM
3

I wouldn't refer to it as "Europe's policy". There's no European policy on circumcision, and that's coming from a circumcised European.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:15 AM
6

Hah. Hahaha. HHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH It's hard enough to get most women to admit they're wrong in general(Yes I know, that is a generalization). Good luck getting a feminist to admit that.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:14 AM
1

That's utterly untrue. The patriarchy is a radfem myth.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:08 AM
1

I'm linking this alot lately You da man. Always remember, the magic of technology and people calling you is the ability to completely ignore it ;) You don't like those people you can literally freeze 'em out and stick to people you do like. If your entire circle of friends was hers then that's your own fault and a mistake alot of people make, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:32 AM
4

You're missing the message. Technically a "mutant" can be a minority. But then technically all men are a minority, by a slim margin. The point the author is making is that gender, race, orientation do not matter. It is the person and their actions that matter. So when discussing "There's not enough women in X job" the response would be "Those women whom applied and got denied obviously weren't qualified". While I know that's not correct in many cases, it riles me up personally when people say th…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:23 AM
1

That's the largest crock of shit I've ever heard. You realise women can do all of those things too, right? I don't know what century you're living in, but women can vote, sell and own land, be the "head of household", join the army, and men do not "marry their daughters off". And what the hell does church have to do with anything? The patriarchy, again, something you do not understand, is not what you are describing. What you are describing is just society. The two definitions of patriarchy; Wha…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:19 AM
1

You don't understand the definition of Patriarchy. A patriarchy is the belief held by feminists that society is secretly controlled by men to put women down and hold a set of values that promote male-dominance. In short, a male-dominated power structure throughout society and relationships with a systemic bias against women.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:50 AM
2

I think there's some points to be raised; Both the girls and the boy were minors. I think the result of the girls being minors is the reason for such a light charge. However, the second point is to be raised; If these girls were boys and the boy was a girl, this story would be entirely different.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:58 AM
1

HAHAHAHAH patriarchy That concept is in of itself a load of misandryst bullshit. 2 responses to the term "Man Up"; 1) Fuck you 2) No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayzwzGB2kXw
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:49 AM
3

In all honesty there's also much television that displays women as total morons.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:45 AM
1

One less dike I have to worry about mixing up with sane women.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:36 AM
0

Point I'm making is that generalizations of a gender are moronic.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:16 PM
4

I reckon we start a petition asking for her job.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:32 AM
2

We should just start having audio recordings when we ask to have sex with women just to confirm in like 10 years when they accuse of raping them way back when that they did, in fact, consent.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:29 AM
0

You've got a valid point but it comes from a twisted view. A relationship is built on mutual trust and understanding and affection. A man should be able to trust a woman(Or a person trust another person) to not fuck them over like this. When a woman is on the pill, a man trusts the woman when she says she is on the pill. I'm not saying the man should not take his own precautions. I'm just saying you can't blame him when somebody he should logically have trust in lies to him.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:27 AM
-2

You sound worse than a feminist. Throwing terms around like "victim blaming" and "abuse apologist". Not to mention you're equating two different crimes. Get your logic straight.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:24 AM
0

No it's not. You give the Men's Right Movement a bad name. He ditched basic, common, human decency. Yeah, she's a total bitch. Manipulative. Utterly disgusting. Still a person. Still has feelings. Was vulnerable, weak, mentally unstable. What does the OP do? Severs all communication with her and refuse to contact them. Whether he likes it or not, forgoing common human decency makes him almost as bad as her. This isn't a man "defending himself". This isn't a person "defending themselves". This is…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:22 AM
1

But but but... Common human decency! You people give the MRM a bad name.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:18 AM
2

I know right? There's a reason why the MRM gets a bad rap and this is one of them. Forgoing common human decency, in this kind of situation, is just morally wrong from a basic human stand point. But hey, his life his decisions. All he needs to remember how shit he felt when he was betrayed by his partner and then remember that his actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:17 AM
-1

And all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:13 AM
1

Meh, a'int nothing I can do about that. I'm not too concerned, video wasn't massively mindblowing anyways, kinda displayed what we already know and experience.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:26 PM
1

I've no clue about it. All I saw was the videos.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:21 PM
0

I'm not saying make amends. At all. I'm just saying it's human decency to just at least own up to the fact you want nothing to do with them. That you shouldn't just sever communication like that with any human being. Especially in the situation the OP was in(Has some stuff, was in a moderately long relationship etc etc). Get rid of them, by all means, but just saying "Oh, you got an abortion? Well now that that's over, fuck you I'm not talking to you ever again." is a bit, well, bad in my book. …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:16 PM
0

And I'm not arguing that at all. All I'm arguing is 2 wrongs != right
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:31 AM
-3

Yeah, so I get why you did what you did. But it was wrong. You should face up to that - not as a man, but as a decent human being. Not having the guts to tell her to her face that you want nothing to do with her... Not to mention I would wager that seeing as she finally did get the abortion she would be feeling some measure of guilt. I would suggest answering that call the next time. It's the right thing to do. And yes, I know, I read the whole thing. She's a crazy bitch out of her mind, and her…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:44 AM
1

I marked it NSFW cus, well, there are some slightly NSFW images there. Disclaimer; I don't endorse everything in this video. I think it's mildly humourous but it kinda makes some very good points, just by having a compilation of clips that shows the inherent sexism of the modern feminist coupled with how society views and treats men. Also it kind of debunks the claim many feminists make that there is no "female protagonists" and the entertainment industry is sexist.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:25 AM
3

Ireland is actually a country where extreme feminism isn't that much of an issue. You get some complaints, but it's not as bad as you'd see in say, the US. In informed media, men's issues are very much highlighted aswell. Glad we've finally started this campaign.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:57 AM
0

Was about to say that.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:53 AM
1

I hate her because she's a dumb ignorant bitch.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:07 AM
3

Too bad the guy got fired first. For making a joke.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:44 AM
-1

I a'int stopping shit for that stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:26 PM
1

I have to disagree. As /u/Xanthu said, explanation through pamphlets and heavily emphasizing that is it also available to men would clear that up.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:25 PM
16

Student Support Center would do, I think. Or something like Student Personal Support Center, or Student Crisis Support Center or something along those lines.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:48 AM
0

You were born a man and you lost it by accident. So yeah. Unless you decide to make it an opportunity to change sex, you're a guy.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:36 PM
3

Evidence in the trial was heard that Tanya flew into a fit of rage after Paul had come home from a night out at the Stringfellow's club where he had viewed a lap-dance. "It was Tanya that brought him there with another couple. It was her that organised the dance for him, and then she stormed home and waited for him to come home," said Noel. It's not all defending her.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:25 AM
9

Living in Ireland I have to entirely disagree. Ireland is not Catholic dominated in the slightest anymore. We're defined as the "Second most atheist country in Europe". This man was the exception not the rule when it comes to divorce here. We used to be backward as fuck(Divorce was still illegal until the mid 90's) but things rapidly changed. Regardless, this is a tragic case, but in all honesty I think the guy was a fool to let himself stay in that situation.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:22 AM
0

Personally I would have no problem shaving my armpits. Hair's annoying as shit.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:19 AM
0

A hermaphrodite by definition has components of both genders. I'll call that person what they want to be called because they can legitimately be either or.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:17 AM
0

What are those "physical definitions?" Having a dick is good enough for me. If (s)he doesn't have man parts that she a'int a man. If (s)he does than he is. Until he gets that part sorted out he's a man no matter what he says.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:15 AM
4

Well and good to say that, but people are allowed to vent their frustration all they want as long as they have it solidly thought out and is actually accurate, in my opinion. Personally, I have never seen or heard of "feminists" doing anything for anybody but white women. The feminism movement caters specifically to that demographic, they don't give a shit about the poor or women of other races. So in that light I consider the OP very valid criticism of a movement which this movement has been cr…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:02 AM
5

That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:59 AM
5

If only courts weren't biased.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:24 PM
2

Go to the press.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:22 PM
1

It's bigotry in its purest essence. And I'm pretty sure sensible people care about sexism.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:12 PM
3

Has to be joking
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:11 PM
4

It's funny because that picture is a man in woman's lingerie.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:37 PM
4

Sounds like an asshole.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:20 PM
3

That "white knight" is a retard and is definitely responsible for his own actions. Only so much "conditioning" can be blamed on society, people have the right to think for themselves. You could, no? Why not him?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:18 PM
6

How did it take me so long to discover the MRM?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:10 AM
2

I think that's perfectly reasonable. If people don't want to they don't need to go on her show.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:28 PM
6

It just might be, maybe that utter lack of gender reference.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:19 PM
1

I pulled that from the subreddit itself, I didn't make it, I just browsed there and found it. You would have to talk to a reddit mod for more information.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:37 PM
146

I was reading and my thought was "Well at least they kept consistent and haven't mentioned the victim's name..." Eric Zuber lol nope
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:38 PM
3

I wouldn't consider the consequences of child bearing and child birth a "sacrifice". But then again I'm a man.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:26 PM
15

Feminism wasn't always this bad. It used to be a movement with merit... Back in like the 60's and 70's where women actually didn't have equal rights to men - hell in Ireland(My country) women couldn't even work in public service if they were married. In those eras and those times I think feminism was a warranted political alignment. But nowadays it's just female-superiority crack pots for the very large part.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:23 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/Plgv6rk.jpg The word cloud for that subreddit. Notice "women" an "atheist" are said with equal frequency and how feminism is quite often said aswell lol
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:21 PM
8

Themes that they have often encouraged(By "they" I mean women).
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:18 PM
3

It wasn't impolite, just stupid.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:11 PM
2

New York; The Police State.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:25 AM
2

Let us know how it goes(I suppose that goes without saying). Don't get emotional or anything like that - as in aggravated. Just try to make the seriousness of the situation clear to him but, try not to be a hard ass about it. He was trying to make a bit of a joke for class entertainment, not a social statement, you don't wanna be that guy, if you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:05 AM
13

Facebook; Where hate-speech is heavily cracked down on(Unless it's against men). That said, IDGAF about Facebook. It's a terrible site and I'm only on it out of necessity...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:47 AM
9

Funny thing is that the male is held accountable if both people are below legal age of consent. So, hypothetically, a 10 year old would go to jail for "raping" a 15 year old girl, whereas a 17 year old girl would be arrested for a "love affair" with a 10 year old...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:30 AM
2

You're missing his point. Posters, feminists etc target men, without differentiation. They label all men as rapists. British Airways banned all men from being near minors. The point, I believe, he is making, is that when we hear of women going on about men oppressing women and beating them and raping them, we all agree with the sentiment... up until the time we realize that we are the person they are calling an oppressor and rapist. When they say "Take back the night", they are talking about "ta…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:25 PM
3

Rape is a far away thing from our first hand experience, as men, I agree. In terms of frequency of rape, I think the frequency is blown out of proportion but it doesn't mean it's an uncommon crime. As said, we're quite distanced from rape as an occurrence but I do believe it is a common crime, especially when we consider the rise in alcohol abuse(And I know, she drank the alcohol willing etc etc). While most women don't get raped, women do get raped. The same way most men aren't beaten by their …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:34 PM
25

I wouldn't consider it a "marginal crime". We want to be treated equally but it doesn't mean we should belittle the traumatic experience that rape is for a woman.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:14 PM
14

That's an extremely powerful message.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter