TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DBi Archive

View 5 posts and 198 comments by DBi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do you think if I just switched to actual oranges that would be enough?
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:50 AM
1

I'll give it a try, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 12:46 AM
1

I drink orange juice because it keeps my throat clear, if I don't my throat gets sore and mucus filled. So I drink about two cartons a week. This has been a constant for about two/three years now, do you have any suggestions for alternatives?
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 08:56 PM
1

International Business isn't useless in the United States, especially if you couple it with a foreign language like Spanish or Chinese. You just need to go for an international business like koch.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 01:18 PM
12

donald trump is fuck the world rich, attitude can have an impact but for most people it can't nix a rape accusation.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 11:18 AM
2

just apply to every phone shop?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:22 PM
2

Assuming they started around 20-21 and where middle class at the time 100,000 is modest especially if they have help from the government. I don't agree really because savings is not income and really the point(that I was trying to make) is that people should be allowed to have savings period, it is the easiest instrument with which to protect yourself in case of actual disaster. Also for a family 100,000 is not really anything if they both lose their income that is maybe 3-4 years of living at t…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 06:27 PM
2

You have a lot of good points something I want to say however is the law should completely ignore savings when looking at whether or not someone qualifies for assistance of any sort. If people cannot save there are very few ways for them to work towards putting themselves in a different situation than they are in currently
/r/MensRights27/12/13 12:40 AM
2

Texas allows imputation of income for business owners
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:55 AM
2

It is not always good to hold back, and it won't' be a scandal unless the grand parents manage to convince a court to give them custody something that would have you running for all the resources you had anyways so you might as well have them involved from the get go, they can probably help find you a good lawyer in the area as well.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:31 PM
2

American children can leave the country with their parents, don't speak such nonsense. EDIT: and it's definitely a good idea going for full custody don't want the judge think he's trying to be a parent on the cheap and letting the Grand parents establish custody rights cuts him out completely if his situation changes.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:27 PM
3

" I play a lot of video games, read a lot of books, spend a lot of time fighting right to bear arms and MRA neckbeards on reddit. " The men are kind of Hilarius
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:40 AM
20

Just say no, christ it's your dick worst case scenerio you have to punch the surgeon/doctor in the face.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:44 AM
3

You know you can just call people to come change the locks prolly wouldn't take too long. EDIT: make sure you tell any landlords
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:58 PM
10

" Gullickson blamed the false rape report on her boyfriend. He "forced" her to make the false claim, she alleged." Nice.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:51 PM
13

Eh sounds like she's gonna have it and is assuming you where bluffing by saying you where going to ghost, I'd start getting your passport and savings in order.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:59 AM
1

If I where you I would leave now, I use to have violent melt downs and I don't know if it's the same with you but I just can't be around violent people anymore it just makes everything worse.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:55 PM
4

So she put her daughter at risk of molestation? If I was a lawyer I would take this just to make sure the kid avoided that. Kinda sucks hope you find someone good at his/her job.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:48 AM
1

With today’s high incidence of blended families, the biological parent may not be the only parent with support obligations. Once a stepparent voluntarily agrees to provide support for a non-biological child in his care during the marriage, he is then equitably estopped from denying the obligation to continue support payments after the divorce. See, e.g., M.H.B v. H.T.B., 100 N.J. 567, 498 A.2d 775 (1985). and see the section called presumed parents, these could easily be stretched to apply towar…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:43 PM
1

Ah, leave her now as opposed to later you already don't trust her so it isn't going to last anyways.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:09 PM
1

It falls under the same concepts as actually supporting the child. A promise to support can levy child support just as strongly see marriage the mother would just have a more difficult time with proving this.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:08 PM
6

Because she can use that promise to collect child support even if the child isn't yours. Of course that assumes she can prove you said these things
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:41 AM
25

Disappointed in your self, why? You've done nothing wrong this lady put you in a vulnerable position you can choose to tolerate that and let her and the systems in place steal from you until you're bled dry or you can find somewhere to live and make a living.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:36 AM
16

Go to Brazil? if you make six figures you could start saving now and have a decent start up fund by the time you get there.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 11:27 PM
24

Try and get a printed transcript of your text messages from your phone company they should have a copy. EDIT: unless by talk you actually meant talk in that case you're phone company can't help you
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:00 PM
2

90 a week
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:52 AM
3

But if she uses the money she can still come back and renew payments, child support can't really be written of like that because it's considered the right of the child. So if the child is not provided for they will come after you regardless of any deals or other arrangement.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:29 PM
2

"Well, now. If little by little you stop loving me I shall stop loving you. Little by little. If suddenly you forget me, Do not look for me, for I shall already have forgotten you. " ~Pablo Neruda
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:58 PM
8

This, make sure you have secure hard copies(print outs in a safe) and go ahead and forward the relevant emails to another email, maybe one made specifically for this use.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:44 AM
2

This 'bro' is a massive tool.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:29 AM
1

Make sure you review condom use either with a teacher or Counselor (they might have for faulty for this on campus) if that's not possible buy some and go to a doctor to review condom usage.(don't ever lay with a lady without a condom even if she says she is on the pill, unless of course you have no problem being tied to her for at least 18 years) I sometimes think the gender segregation sometimes present in these schools is so you guys and gals rush into it when you can and start poppin' out bab…
/r/seduction13/08/12 02:29 PM
1

Don't let this guy talk you into trimming your bush
/r/seduction06/07/12 05:41 AM
23

So the 11 year old used the term deadbeat dad? wonder who taught him that.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 11:12 PM
2

Well if you get thrown in jail you get free health care don't you? go for it maybe start up a kick starter for a legal fund if they actually decide to come after you?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:50 AM
0

No no no, I am saying it is ok to kill if you did not consent to that dependency and that dependency cannot be transferred to someone willing. My use of the term biological dependency was an attempt to help you understand the specific subject , embryo's and there host. In any case it is a legitimate distinction even if you fail to understand it. And it doesn't justify killing the weak or the helpless there are people willing to help the weak and the helpless and even if there weren't there isn't…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 12:08 AM
-1

That biological dependency is not given by consent, other forms of dependency are. When a zygote forms within you it is my opinion that the host should have a right to respond, simply on the basis that they did not consent to it's presence and should not be forced to uphold it's dependency on them. Is that clear enough?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:55 PM
0

My point is we can continue(and I will) without the karma, it was English so I'm not sure what you're confused about.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:49 PM
0

Yes it does, you are discounting nature as something to be acted against when the capability exists. This is how I view nature, you continue to be obtuse in your understanding.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:48 PM
-2

I will likely need it(family history), but that's not my point. Dialysis is given willingly either for money or other reasons it is not a consequence of anything but weakness(biological) and protective will. Again biological dependence is a consequence of nature, the dependency is not given by consent but by nature.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:39 PM
-1

Do we need the karma? we can talk without it.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:37 PM
-1

No, transplants are willingly given, if they where not they would indeed die, but no one is forced into donating organs as it's considered immoral you see? I fail to see how dialysis is a biological dependence. EDIT: If you understand my arguments and if they are wrong you should be able to give me some reason to force someone else to carry a zygote a blastocyst or even a fetus. Something compelling that ties them together and overrides the rights of the host, do you have one? And although I do …
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:22 PM
-1

Biological dependence survives of the use of a hosts own body, other forms of dependence do this as well but they cannot be tied to someone the way a zygote(or an embryo) can. What I am saying is taking a family member into your home can usually be quickly reversed, letting a zygote remain can however be harder to reverse. If you honestly cannot understand the distinctions I am making then there is little we can do for one another. A zygote implanting is not a conscious choice therefore if it wh…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 07:26 PM
0

How does a zygote sense and act without a brain or sensory organs, the fact of the matter is it doesn't. It is a matter of biochemical reactions that allows the embryo(because at this point it is no longer considered a zygote anyways) to implant in the uterus. In any case your statement is irrelevant as a zygote is not what implants into a uterus.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:48 AM
-1

When did I make an argument for abortion? I am simply trying to point out that your distinctions are pointless, a zygote should not be imposed on anyone and you have given no reason for me to think otherwise, that is the sum of my arguments. Being unique is not by nature a desirable value so I fail to see how that supports your stance. Also by what reasoning do you call a zygote a living thing but not sperm/eggs? And I did not equate sperm with a complete human I just don't think the differences…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:25 AM
-3

and how does a zygote react to anything? See 1 & 5 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/react+?s=ts And a baby is more than a clump of cells, it is an organ system with a brain and a matching set of instincts, a baby is life, a zygote, a sperm, or an egg is not. Also a reflex does not guarantee survival and I never claimed it did, the fact of matter is sperm/zygotes/eggs do not have conscious or unconscious thoughts or reactions, that is why I do not view them as anything special.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:17 AM
-3

Do you not know what reflex means?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:43 AM
-5

Except the value of a zygote is it's potential to grow into an independent human being if this value was removed it would be just a bunch of cells, sperm holds the same potential it just has different conditions for success. This is why they can in my mind be compared. The fact that a zygote is 'genetically complete' is irrelevant it still needs outside factors to reach it's potential it is not independent and as such I see no reason to hold it higher than sperm in any meaningful way(in regards …
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:26 PM
2

(as by design, the vast majority of zygotes grow and develop through the entire human life cycle under even poor conditions, more so under good or ideal conditions.) Source please
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:21 PM
23

That's like playing chicken except with relationships, not bright that is to say.
/r/seduction12/06/12 01:05 AM
1

Could I have some of your sources, specifically the std rates of Ukraine, and whatever has you thinking whatever dangerous jobs there are the Ukraine won't hire women. Also crime rates for rapes(sex slavery being common, compared to what?) thefts and murders involving sex workers compared to others. I do agree with you it should always be one way not half and half if the john will be punished so should the sex worker, and the same if they where going to be let off. Also how many sex workers do y…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:47 AM
5

Open up a line of credit pay your lawyer with that, keep your rent and utilities on. Worst case you have to declare bankruptcy but at least you'll have your kid.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:05 PM
3

no problem
/r/MensRights19/05/12 02:19 AM
3

http://www.mgtowforums.com/forums/
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:08 PM
2

It still exists under it's own domain now though.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:52 AM
5

A college education is not risky if you think before you act. Have good study habits(and don't be a complete moron), and do your best to pick a major that has actual careers to go with it and you will be fine.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:52 PM
3

Dude fuck no, I make(900) that at my job and I'm minimum wage(with some small comission work). Is there no way for you too try for an adjustment?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:28 PM
5

Wouldn't the heat from the computer ruin the condoms?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:51 PM
2

But I thought Atheism itself was male dominated wouldn't it make sense for the subreddit to match.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:41 PM
2

So you want them fed but don't want to feed them yerself?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:01 AM
0

Find her some work at your company, invite her out to dinner after the set?(invite her at the set not before she shoes up.)
/r/seduction23/04/12 01:05 PM
1

Sister-in-law is a horrible mother imo, but i dont have kids yet so i cant judge tooooo much. The only tones of voice she has for her daughter are loud and louder, and both contain resentment. Her daughter can do no right, and she has no patience to do or teach her anything. She is horrible with her finances, and will never catch up, which leads us to the problem. She now wants child support, and even said that because we live in texas, the guy will have to pay back support for the whole 5 years…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 03:12 AM
31

First thing to do is confirm it's your kid.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:38 AM
11

Unless he has something against banging drunk chicks
/r/seduction17/04/12 04:05 AM
1

Sometimes but we(in Kansas anyways) do refer to our heating bills as our gas bills.(us using mostly gas supplied water heaters) But I suppose you could be right as he didn't put in electricity in.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:13 PM
1

What country/state do you live in?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:20 AM
1

Take your GED, line up a job somewhere then if your parents stand in your way get emancipated.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:19 AM
2

One way I think would be increase the amount of cooperation among men to further a more equal legal atmosphere between men and women from the viewpoint of men(women already have their representation as they should) as it is men will just act independently and this will have results of course but they will be slow. This I consider the most important factor so it is the only one I will mention.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:17 AM
1

By gas I think he means for heating?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 11:41 PM
2

https://www.google.com/search?q=backing+up+voicemails&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Seems promising your going to have to look over it(and find the specific solution) yourself though I've got homework. It might even calm you down a bit.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:48 AM
7

There isn't any reason to think the case he is referring to applies to you.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:41 AM
15

yep, don't even worry about clogging anything a plumber is most definitely cheaper than a baby or CS.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:32 AM
3

Do voice mails fall under one/two party consent laws? they aren't really the same type of communication as an actual phone conversation, maybe you should bring that up with your lawyer? After all they know it's being recorded just by participating that could be taken as consent to the recording.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:30 AM
1

Hey I understood discretion when I was in high school just because most don't doesn't mean it shouldn't be emphasized.
/r/seduction28/03/12 05:59 AM
2

Keep your mouth shut and they won't be worried about their reputations.
/r/seduction28/03/12 01:53 AM
6

Soooooooo why is young in that phrase?
/r/seduction25/03/12 03:01 AM
0

Can I get a link to that CDC Study? Is this the same one that shows hetero sexual intercourse at 90%?
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:52 AM
3

Well if they over complicate it they get to sell another book.
/r/seduction28/12/11 03:07 AM
6

Realize this is sarcasm or satire or something but on the off chance you're a nutter I'll just point out you might be leaving little boys and girls to be raised by feminists.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 05:42 PM
2

The only difference between the ideal and reality when it comes to most things is in my opinion human effort and weakness. In your case you don't even think it's possible so your not going to put in any effort and the same could be said of many others, and while I'm sure something could be done to convince you and others to do as I've suggested I have a(paying) job at the moment and other people getting laid isn't a big enough problem for me to invest effort in. So I will say sorry for my lack o…
/r/seduction18/11/11 09:35 PM
5

it's not as simple as just everyone approaching everyone else. XD yes it is, if everyone who wanted to get laid just approached whoever they wanted to sleep with the world would be a much more interesting place. Unfortunately we have fear and a host of other human troubles to interfere.
/r/seduction18/11/11 07:59 PM
1

Told by who? scared people? prosecutors?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:06 AM
2

I would say don't give up, if the coma joke was in text form that will likely fall in your favor(since it obviously isn't a death threat) but otherwise it's just your word against hers. I would say giving up is the worst thing you could do, you gain nothing from it and it might even still count against you in the future.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 03:29 AM
3

I remember when I used to have to make it halfway through the post before calling troll. I'm either getting older or trolls are becoming low quality.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 10:33 PM
1

yes I told my love, I told my love, I told her all my heart, Trembling, cold, in ghastly fears, Ah! she did depart! That would be past tense
/r/seduction27/10/11 11:15 AM
1

Not really, when women moved out of the house the working couple became the norm, it changed our economy at a fundamental level. There is no reason not to expect the same here.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:11 PM
7

Maybe you should bold the last statement might prevent some negligent down-voting.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:43 AM
1

Never said I planned too?
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:25 AM
3

Only 300 a month? I make 400 a month that would kill me
/r/MensRights26/09/11 10:37 PM
6

sperm donor had no part in gestating that's a smart cookie right there /s
/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:31 PM
2

Yeah sorry bout that my eyes where not reading anything right
/r/MensRights15/09/11 11:19 PM
3

yep
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:02 AM
5

I'm going to guess it has to do with age as they say that Mexico doesn't allow someone her age to be jailed.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:11 PM
1

both of them mind you, she can't declare them married on her own.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 07:11 PM
2

See this started off well but I had to take away my upvote. Seriously sounds like a paranoid rant. He basically fills the role a woman fills traditionally so there isn't much risk of any financial shenanigans that would harm him. Combine that with the fact that she's stuck by for 10 year 9 of which without a child or anything else that might obligate her to stick around and he has absolutely no reason not to get married. TL:DR Questioning her reasons for sticking around is silly unless you are a…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:30 AM
3

You could make a little recording saying any communication(or interaction) with you is subject to audio and/or video recording, and your participation will be interpreted as consent. Play it before any interaction with her and record conversation with a separate device. Worse thing that I can see happening is she goes off on you, and in that case you should have a recording. Also you should start looking for lawyers to get your named removed from the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:45 PM
3

Just going to put this out here, men have what is known as a shit eating grin, the smile on the face of the woman with the cardboard is what I equate as the females shit eating grin. < This statement is a generalization.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:39 PM
2

In the united states in depends on state, it's a pretty easy list to find though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#One-party_notification_states (section above lists two party consent states)
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:17 PM
1

Only because you ignore what more there is to it.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 12:25 PM
1

Oh, in that case the confusion is probably just coming from the fact that it isn't what most think of when they think of rape, violent and forceful on a physical level. I would say it makes it different yes but I don't see why it should be treated with less disgust although it should perhaps have less legal consequences, or at the least a different name with the same sentencing and classifications.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 03:41 AM
3

I'm not telling anyone to do anything, he has no legal right to blackmail anyone even if they had tried to steal from him.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:49 PM
1

What? They both fucked up, that's about all for the morality part. He fucked up by using threats for sexual favors and she fucked up by trying to rob him.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:47 PM
2

No it isn't(elitism) civilians do not have the legal right to circumvent the legal system through private bargaining, at least not when it comes to criminal matters. He doesn't have the right to barter with her when it comes to criminal matters that's the problem. The law isn't his to play with as an individual. Heck not even the police have that right although they probably do it plenty.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:03 PM
2

No? And what part of my post makes you think I said so? I've been claiming the whole time that it isn't a legitimate alternative to blackmail someone who has committed a crime.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:00 PM
3

It is not his place to make a deal. It isn't his place to gain from her crimes.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 08:58 PM
1

You are not forcing her to deal with the cops by reporting her crimes, she can still run and if anyone would be forcing her to deal with the cops it would be the cops. Also it is not a threat unless you intend to extract something from her. And if he really didn't want her to deal with the cops he could have just kicked her off his property and declined to report her crime. What you are describing would be a punishment and it may or may not be a fair punishment depending on where her case ended …
/r/MensRights04/09/11 06:58 PM
3

Yes you clearly can. Perhaps you do not understand the meaning of the word threat? That the alternative "offered" has less consequences than what would happen otherwise does not make it less of a threat. The purpose a threat is to get someone to submit to your will if the threat was not powerful enough it would not have worked. It is not any civilian's place to be bargaining people out of criminal legal consequences anyways.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 06:54 PM
1

Threatening to call the police is a threat it is also intimidation because he intended to alter her behavior with said threat. Now why did she give the blowjob if not because she was fearful of the legal consequences(which he told her he would bring into being)? *"Threatening or frightening someone into doing something." * http://www.google.com/url?url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/schools/11_16/citizenship/glossary/index.shtml&rct=j&sa=X&tbs=dfn%3A1&ei=3aJjTsfvHsODsgLt-KyUCg&ved=0CD8Qngk…
/r/MensRights04/09/11 04:13 PM
7

So what, are you saying it's ok to threaten people to get them to have sex with you, but only as long as you threaten them with the law? You aren't an officer are you? Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercion what you are claiming isn't coercion is still coercion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercion#Psychological And be sure to google define coercion
/r/MensRights04/09/11 03:11 PM
2

Why? Do you think it's a grey area.(Can't really have a discussion if no one explains themselves)
/r/MensRights04/09/11 02:31 PM
13

mmm no, it was coercive(forced? blackmailed?) that would make it rape. just because he didn't use his hands is irrelevant and while this kind of thing can be iffy sometimes I doubt this is one of the grey areas.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 01:27 PM
1

The problem is you thinking said hypothetical man wants non-consual sex and the only reason he isn't going around raping other people is because he might be punished.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 04:43 AM
1

the implications of this post concerning your thoughts are a bit dark.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 04:25 AM
2

Same there are a few good female fantasy authors Anne Mccaffrey and Andre Norton comes to mind. But I'm not really proactive when looking for books so I wouldn't be able to inject more women into my reading without fucking up my whole system.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 02:01 AM
1

that's one example it doesn't show that Romeo and Juliet is the usual reason for low(when compared to other states) age of consent.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:12 PM
1

source, Kansas it's just 16 age of consent(I think there is an exception for authority figures such as teachers).
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:36 AM
1

someone would complain but no one would actually care? Kind of like this really. Besides Must be very cute not just fuckable is a good standard.(can't fuck a woman all day helps to have something to enjoy while your cock isn't in her) He might get called a pedo for the body hair thing but that requires another conversation. Depending on the singer the only issue(from a PR perspective) would be the body hair comment.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:52 PM
5

Eh, I don't see why i should care who she wants plowing her. Don't know why she said sex starved and then added an age limit.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:36 PM
2

A child can still enjoy a social father while knowing where his DNA comes from. A test would ensure all with a biological stake may have an opportunity to act as father, while ensuring a social father does not come about under fraudulent circumstances. It also makes a complete medical history for the child viable.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:49 PM
2

Just make it a requirement to be listed as a father(on the birth certificate). If you also make it difficult to claim tax exemptions and benefits without a declared father it should be just as good as mandatory(close to what we have now) while still giving the option for avoidance.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 12:32 AM
0

be sure to take a look at the rest of the thread, it's pretty sweet.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 12:29 AM
1

apreciato
/r/MensRights10/08/11 11:13 PM
1

is there a list of the NSFW subreddits, because I keep finding them and it's starting to grate on me.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:54 PM
3

make him make him make him Anyone else disturbed by those links?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 04:35 AM
1

I've started thinking and I think nowadays that a woman who cannot be independent is not worth fucking. So yes it is important to me now, although it wasn't a shot time ago.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 08:51 PM
3

This reminds me of second grade, someone reported a 'weapon' on school property so they send two cops after one of the only two colored students(the other being my fraternal twin sister) got expelled for fighting/running/hiding from them. Really fucked up town Goddard, KS. Don't raise your kids there best case scenario they end up as a doped up dealer who can't stop using his/her own shit. Always found it funny two cops couldn't handle a kid, super glad they didn't have tazers.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:19 AM
1

sorry replied too soon
/r/MensRights30/07/11 05:09 PM
-2

Don' hate on nerds.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 01:13 PM
3

yeah I found that odd maybe they have a 'friend' in the office.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:49 AM
2

divorce her before she gets new debt or you discover some new debts of hers.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 08:42 PM
3

Well it's "the other side" for a reason.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 08:12 PM
0

who else came for the proof
/r/seduction01/07/11 05:42 PM
3

I don't see how the posts the number 3 are goofy. I also don't see much wrong with the way MR mods operate, its a free speech zone in there so their personality doesn't really matter to me as long as they continue with the hands off approach. Is not a reason to leave its a reason to stay so we can continue building up a solid user base to combat people who interfere with /r/mr in a hostile manner. I do think we need a better logo though and a better phrase but I've been at a loss at what to reco…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 06:24 PM
1

The definition that you are using does not match up with the one used in the poll. Compare "thinks abortion should outlawed and criminalized" and "53% currently say abortion should be legal only under certain circumstances." see http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/-trrvu0n2ec-mym1hguzfa.gif Also see "With the first pro-choice president in eight years already making changes to the nation's policies on funding abortion overseas, expressing his supp…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:49 AM
-1

What study shows over half of the U.S. thinks abortion should outlawed and criminalized, none, quit blowing smoke out of your ass.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:07 PM
-1

He could have made a few calls and BORROWED the money.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:50 AM
3

How is he abandoning them he had nothing to do with them? He was not allowed to see them he didn't have the financial resources to support them, he was about to be thrown in jail. How? He would have no emotional bonds with his children by the time they where grown, he was no longer in a position to even support them from afar. They lost nothing from his suicide the law had already made him nothing to his children, he did not abandon them.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:48 AM
7

No it is worst than that, it is clear how he views his wife and while I cannot say for certain whether or not he loves her going by his last testament it is clear he does not hate her.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 08:25 PM
4

There is no intellectual high ground on the internet you madman.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 09:57 AM
3

He wouldn't have asked if he had no intention to refuse, haven't you heard what happens when young women who do not want children decide to have themselves sterilized? It's well documented and much the same.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 09:47 PM
1

In my state a denial that something like that has occurred(assuming it didn't) is enough unless it can be proven that you espoused marriage. Not sure if witnesses would be enough to over turn that. I still wouldn't recommend doing anything to risk it. Common Law Marriages A common law marriage is a marriage by agreement of the two persons without any formal ceremony or license. A common law marriage will be recognized in Kansas if the couple considers themselves to be married and publicly holds …
/r/MensRights21/06/11 09:41 PM
2

For 83% wouldn't that be kind of hard to list in a title?
/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:40 PM
2

Sounds like its time to move.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 02:36 PM
1

why the downvotes?
/r/MensRights17/06/11 11:52 PM
5

If this problem your referring to is the kid then it becomes solely the woman's burden, why? Well because they are not obligated legally to keep said burden, as was pointed out earlier they have abortion where available and abandonment(legal abandonment) if all else fails.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:23 PM
4

Why? By that logic it is just as easy to say that one person should be responsible for the child as he/she knew the risks.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:28 PM
2

I worry about this because I know it's true and I know I will have to prevent a good portion of my male friends from losing sight of justice and reason.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:45 PM
1

The best option is a surrogate with the help of any family you have, perhaps a nanny if they can't be given alimony in your area(only been done once before to my knowledge, but once is enough isn't it?).
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:19 PM
8

Treated like marriage, so no, no cohabitation in areas that have common law marriage either.(wiki should help if you need to find which states have it)
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:17 PM
2

So your children are guaranteed to be financially secure. get the fuck out, come back when they're grown.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 04:35 PM
1

Do you have the names of those panels?
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:30 PM
1

The abolition of legalized indebted servitude in the form of child support and alimony.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:12 PM
2

Does that hold across all sections? That is does Canada's infantry have 15% females and do they serve in a combat role? What does Canada call it's infantry?
/r/MensRights14/05/11 11:01 PM
1

And we have the right to disagree and try and change their ways.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 08:29 AM
16

except it isn't female interaction really, it's parent interaction they just arbitrarily cut out male parents. It is a social club but one which concerns the well being of ones own children. There is no justification for cutting out men.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:06 PM
1

If your going to treat it as an obligation to the children the proper thing to do would be putting a monetary value on said obligation and subtracting it from any work total. But that's a bit silly in my opinion, they're your kids you work for them regardless of how much your time is worth.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:42 AM
2

They incorrectly say it's what you know, it's what you care about. If you do not care about being what others think you should be then you cannot be offended or hurt by such nonsense as having your manhood 'violated'.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 10:42 PM
3

not really, I can't imagine anything that would make me take off work excluding a birth or my marriage, i know other men include others like funerals or someone else's weddings(but as i see it most men follow this and plan social events according to their work schedule) but women seem(to me anyways) to include most social events regardless of whether it has emotional justifications for taking off work. To be blunt I have very rarely seen a woman denied hours when she asks for them and they are a…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 03:21 AM
4

? Have you never worked with women or had sisters? a lot of women(certainly not all) take off for personal items all the time.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:55 PM
1

5-10 years is way to long, do you think it's possible to speed up the process with activism?
/r/MensRights28/04/11 01:21 AM
1

And? That doesn't prove that a single woman has more value that just proves that society views women as a group differently. Besides if MRM continues the draft will either be done away with or opened up to women(although I suspect most would just get pregnant to dodge it). Besides that draft was made decades ago so it is not necessarily proof that currently society views women as more valuable.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:09 PM
1

mmm no, that is just another attempt at equalizing(not saying it's actually equalizing) minority groups. All such programs in America are based on equality.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:05 PM
1

Prove it, there are plenty of women, how do you justify the notion that a single woman is of any more value than a single man when there are so many based solely on her ability to give birth?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 07:45 AM
1

Where? I've not seen it as a central tenet anywhere, but that could just be my ignorance showing itself.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 07:43 AM
2

arguing for equal rights for women under the law is actually arguing for female superiority under the law. No, you just seem to think that is so because that is the way it has been done so far. There has been nothing to check when a law is treating men in an unequal way only when it is done to women. You provide no convincing argument that the law cannot treat people equally. Give me one example of something that the law cannot treat equally between men and women. What privilege do they have tha…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:18 AM
1

What nation encourages fairness as part of its legal system?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:12 AM
2

What state does this, I was under the impression the guidelines weren't lowered for women which is why there are so few in that profession.(aside from the usual risk aversion that is)
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:05 PM
3

If it was beyond understandable how did she understand it? And why did the marriage survive? It was harsh to be sure, but she handled it well enough and I'm sure it was for the best.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 09:18 PM
2

Yes you are, I was getting a bit worried there for a bit. But one other thing, a rights based argument need not be legally valid to be sound. Also I should point out that the one your arguing with does not disagree on the rights of the woman trumping the rights of the fetus he just thinks consideration of rights should be equal, when comparing male and female obligations to the child. Also not all of the current inequalities are based on biology, if male parental obligations could not be establi…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:28 PM
4

Because old men can't be feminist or influenced politically? Yeah, no. Even then I still doubt it was put in place based on feminist ideals, but still your 9 old men comment was silly at best.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:15 PM
1

downvotes?
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:40 PM
2

It's been tried and granted before, and there are other times it has been denied. I can't remember if the reasoning was marital property or some fanciful obligation of the husband to provide sperm.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:23 PM
4

Your wife or woman does not need to know about your stored sperm. and she shouldn't otherwise it might be seized and used.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:11 AM
1

Someone do better math and send it to the administration of Yale, then screech it from the rooftops.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 12:43 AM
1

? The girl could crush yours, it just takes a well aimed punch and if she is not flailing or inordinately weak she should have enough power behind a punch to crush a windpipe. But this is besides the point, they can always use weapons. You said a woman could not kill you with her bare hands I gave you an example of how she could.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 01:41 AM
1

He describing a man which should be eliminated, others should not suffer from ones pride, we as men can define manhood as we wish and pass it down to our sons and nephews. We can pass a desire for such traits to our daughters and nieces. As it stands we either do not teach them what it means to be a man, letting them figure it out for themselves from strangers, or do not think about what we are teaching them. I fully intend to see my soon to be nephew or niece to adulthood as a healthy independe…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 11:35 PM
2

Most of the time it is, if you don't have tenure or seniority and if your pay does not have to increase with age you most likely live in poverty. They also don't get paid overtime.(the states would go broke if they had to pay teachers overtime) It's also expensive to become a teacher(which is why I am not becoming a teacher, otherwise I would) and the pay would leave you in debt(from student loans) at least into your mid thirties. Add all that to brats who have no desire to learn and you have a …
/r/MensRights14/04/11 11:05 PM
6

What's wrong with it? Men and Women should have their own space seems to be it's point, is that something to disagree with?
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:17 PM
1

See the comments from the U.K. people saying this should be the norm, although they seem to be mistaking the norm of the U.S. I must say I appreciate their sentiment.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 10:44 AM
1

Done, sent an email to F&F.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:49 AM
3

Or if the lawyer presses all that is left, after all if he split the assets in half what right does he have to give away her half? Really it was all or nothing.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:10 PM
9

Nonsense it was marital property, he had every right to do with it what he wished, the same with the wife. And his goal was to prevent the divorce by removing temptation if anything he is naive. It was not his intention to neglect his children it was to keep his family together.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:14 AM
2

mmm, no, crushing a windpipe is a relatively easy way to kill someone.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 08:42 AM
2

Ok, Maybe Norway's men need to step up and start some public lynching.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 12:17 PM
2

And be wary of here asking for favors. There is a limit to what friends are to do for one another, treat it like that.
/r/seduction07/04/11 12:39 AM
6

No it's bullshit, men being physically aggressive with women is not common at all. At least not in American Europe and Canada. Anyone who says it is, is an idiot.
/r/seduction07/04/11 12:26 AM
2

If my memory serves me and things haven't changed I would recommend askmen as well.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:02 PM
1

Why wouldn't they be welcome here? Arguments just hone opinions and wipe out ignorance and idiocy, bring them here.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 06:18 AM
1

The Kansas law has not yet been squashed but it has been stalled, there was really no amount of opposition from the public though just one blog from some crazy b**ch. Maybe F&F should get involved, but perhaps not to heavy handedly we Kansans can be a bit peevish about outside interference.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 05:20 AM
2

Being made a veteran in actual combat is not a hardship? Is taking time out of your life to fight for your country leaving your job in the process not a hardship? In this case women had picked up the slack and the government decided the men should be able to get their job back if they choose so, consider it maternity leave for soldiers.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 06:37 PM
5

What an iffy thing to say, it like comparing being maimed physically with being maimed emotionally there are limits to comparisons this would be one of them.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:49 AM
1

G'night G'luck
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:51 AM
2

Eh this point is only a disagreement on it's sexual nature, you agree that it is a severe crime you just don't agree with it being on the list on the basis of sexuality you also disagree with the concept of the list as a whole so that could also be confusing the issue. I use just because ultimately people decide their rights, I do not consider it important because such conflict is subject to the whims of humanity as a whole depending on who, how many and how strongly people are imposing their be…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:31 AM
2

Essentially yes but it is still abusive in a sexual manner, rape is not just battery it is battery of a sexual(specific sexual nature but general is the only way to compare to any meaning) nature. Fair point, But that is just a security and freedom dilemma, and only has bearing if such policies are being abused, which I suppose they are but that is indeed a separate issue. Non-sense what reason would someone have to falsely accuse another if not for societies response legal or otherwise. Anyways…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:00 AM
1

Either is fine for me, answers are answers after all.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:49 AM
2

So removal from the public record in accordance with rehabilitation would make this ok for you?
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:32 AM
3

Your first point is irrelevant, the crime is not using semen the crime is using the sexual relation in an abusive manner. Is that not the most distinctive quality of a sex crime? I feel(and feeling does not invalidate an argument) that men and women should be warned of people who have been shown to cause severe emotional harm to others for selfish(and I say selfish because a modicum of compassion in a woman would prevent a false rape claim) if they would commit this kind of fraud(Which can ruin …
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:29 AM
2

No but using semen obtained from consensual sex to back up a false rape claim does create a sexual connection, I am not reaching. Using the existence of a sexual relationship to back up a false rape claim would also make a sexual connection. The offender list was not made for justice it was made to warn others of sexual offenders, formerly this was solely for serious sexual offenses. To me it is obvious that they should be on some list and kept track of.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:05 AM
2

How nice of you to tell me what I should be. Your suggestions are not incompatible with mine I have no problem with eliminating the lesser crimes from the list, they should have never been there anyways. But this is not just fraud when you accuse a man of rape it is indeed a crime of a sexual nature(especially if the man did indeed have intercourse with her), if the accusation has affected the mans sex drive that is once again another mark for calling it a crime of a sexual nature. But at it's(f…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 07:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter