TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DNDGURU1201 Archive

View 0 posts and 148 comments by DNDGURU1201 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Christians come to mind. How many innocent people did christians kill in the name of jesus? Not many...? And almost never their own people, either. Communists have killed millions of their own people for wrongthink in the name of communism. Every time it's been tried it's left mountains of corpses. Why would this time be any different? Again,pol pot took power because of the us and was removed by communists. Pol Pot was a communist. You can't get around that fact. 2 things about gulags, they hav…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:41 PM
0

Pol Pot murdered anyone who could read or right, around 1/4 of his population in the name of equality and Communism. Mao's great leap forward caused so much starvation there are many credible accounts of widespread cannibalism. the people of the soviet union were eating better than the average american up until the late 1980s Citation? And I suppose that makes the millions Lenin and Stalin murdered in the Gulags ok then lmao
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:17 AM
-1

MGTOW 2.0 was not toxic and didn't hate women Did it rag on shitty female behavior? Sure. But the idea wasn't "women are inherently bad", it was "society's laws incentivize bad behavior from women' You can nutpick all you want, there are always some fringe loonies, but in MGTOW, the most popular figures are people like Better Bachelor, probably one of the nicest, most respectful men you'll ever meet.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:04 PM
2

A word you don't know the meaning of.... No, it's a word YOU don't know the meaning of. CHECKMATE LOSER I can do this all day lol Every capitalist who tries to debate socialism sounds like a baby. How would it be if I used the same tactics? ??? Ok boomer, great argument lmao Is too! Right, that's why every time there's a communist uprising, the communist end up rich as shit and everyone else ends up poorer than when they started...
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:09 AM
1

I understand what it means you dumbass Marxism doesn't say that. Capitalists are each responsible for their own exploitations of the workers. You clearly don't lmao, don't be so insecure I gave an argument and as usual you ignored it 100% Your argument is 'everyone's political ideology is based on the oppressor/oppressed dichotomy" which isn't true at all. It's something exclusive to collectivist ideologies like Communism, Feminism and Nazism. You also haven't provided any refutations. Why can't…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:07 AM
1

He acted like most of them were criminals,when it's just people looking for a better future,and have no other options. They have many options. It's not like they're refugees, Mexico is fairly safe so long as you avoid high-crime hotspots. Also,it takes years to get those things, and that's way too long. Why? Do Americans not have a right to choose who enters their country, yes or no? imagine if the us was your only option, Where is there proof that the US is their only option? Plenty of good ent…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:45 PM
1

But it's still just as messed up to assume those things on them Not really, since it's not an assumption, it's a stated fact. They're disproportionately prone to crime given that many of them are gang members (MS-13). As trump said, some of them are not. But again, if you can't find legitimate work because you're in a country illegally, the incentives align towards criminality. Also,it's pretty hard to get a green card. So what? Do Mexicans have a right for American citizenship? Or do the people…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 09:58 PM
1

you mean illegal immigrants?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 09:07 PM
1

What ideology is not about power? Liberalism: Freedom Libertarianism: No government Conservatism: Maintaining traditional morality What is that supposed to MEAN? You're accusing Marxists of secretly being pro-elite? In a sense, yes, because just as Feminism wants female dominance, Marxism wants to replace the elite with its own members. What evidence is there that Marxists only pretend? They've literally overthrown actual dictators and taken over countries and freed hundreds of millions from abs…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 07:11 PM
1

Based AF
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:18 PM
2

You can recognize a group of people have common interests and tend to act in a common way because of those interests Marxism, because of its obsession with materialism, assumes every action of the rich is taken as a calculated move to acquire more wealth and power (which I suspect is largely a projection on the behalf of the Communists themselves). In fact, there are a myriad of other psychological and religious factors that go into this. Marxism is not about helping the poor; it's about replaci…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:15 PM
1

That describes all of conservatism too. It's too generic to be meaningful. Not at all. Not even close. Conservatism is based around traditional morality and individual justice. Marxism doesn't say that. Capitalists are each responsible for their own exploitations of the workers. You really are stupid. 'Collective guilt' means that communists view the rich as guilty simply by the virtue of being rich. "Everyone I disagree with is a Nazi". Real mature. basis of this conclusion? Your arse. You're a…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:12 PM
1

proof?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:07 PM
1

Trump isn't racist, biden is ("If you don't vote for me, you ain't black") Trump's foreign and domestic policies were great. Peace, trying to pull out of the middle east (the generals lied to him repeatedly about the withdrawal) Biden hasn't done anything on Right To Repair as far as I know (still a great policy), he's pushing racist CRT into schools (which includes "men are evil oppressors" apart of the package) and is generally super authoritarian. Also, he's bombing the shit out of africa and…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:16 PM
7

Monogamy is good for societal stability, and for men to find a mate. That's like saying 'we're not meant to be law-abiding anyway, it's just societal brainwashing, in a state of nature people steal and murder with impunity'
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:40 PM
12

https://reason.com/2019/10/11/manchester-teen-griffiths-sex-offender-friend/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/autism-chattanooga-east-ridge-elementary-united-states-nathan-a9119391.html Not even trying to flirt gets you sex offender status if the woman feels like it it happens, it's not hyperbole. Not often, but precedent matters in law.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:38 PM
10

https://reason.com/2019/10/11/manchester-teen-griffiths-sex-offender-friend/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/autism-chattanooga-east-ridge-elementary-united-states-nathan-a9119391.html Not even trying to flirt gets you sex offender status if the woman feels like it
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:31 PM
300

More and more men are going MGTOW. When an awkward attempt at flirting gets you branded a misogynist rapist, who wants to take that risk?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:36 AM
4

As a sane person
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:15 AM
2

Feminism, Nazism, and Communism all share the same collectivist substructure. Just different victims and different oppressors.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:14 AM
3

I mean, I'm: On the right (i.e. conservative, not just 'not communist' as the cringe commie said above) I support traditional gender roles Feminism wants to keep the parts of traditional gender roles that benefit women, while undermining those that benefit men Traditional gender roles did provide some downsides to men, but it also provided some benefits (and vica versa for women). What feminism did was obliterate any benefits men received from the traditional gender roles, while still holding me…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:10 AM
4

What the fuck is that supposed to mean? The substructure of feminism, Marxism and Nazism are very similar. X group is oppressing Y group, and is collectively guilty for such and needs to be targeted. Feminists: X = Men, Y = Women Marxists: X = Bourgeoisie, Y = Proletariat Nazis: X = Jews, Y = Germans They aren't. All you mean is they are Democrats (right wing) or Liberals (right wing). Well if you're a disingenuous communist who defines everything right of Stalin as 'right-wing' (cringe and reta…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:06 AM
10

Feminism uses the same collectivist substructure as Communism and Nazism. Communism is still a shit-tier ideology, go debate this somewhere else. And also, that's a massive 'no true scotsman'. Modern feminists are almost universally left-wing, and only the prominent right-wing is currently pushing back (not saying that liberals don't, it's just they don't have any real power).
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:28 PM
0

It's cause they're on the verge of tears over Hillary Clinton, it's cringe as shit On it's own, w/e, but with context, hella female energy
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:23 PM
0

I'm not ashamed of being right-wing lmao, and I see, now you're calling me a Nazi, genius.... If it's right-wing position to say 'left and right should work together against the evil that is feminism', then I guess this subreddit has no place for leftists like you
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:15 PM
1

Feminists in general gaslight, what else is new?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:14 PM
1

You even have right-wingers here on this subreddit who told teenage boys who worry getting falsely accused in high-school by a girl to "man-up" and ignore the legal risks and just get with her. Citation? I don't believe you. Also right-wingers have fiercely aligned themselves with feminists. They believe in and validate feminist false concepts like "patriarchy" and "rape culture" Ok, going to definitely need a citation for this one. Have not seen a single conservative ever promote this. and as t…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:02 PM
1

You're actually an idiot and/or a liar. Feminists are literally like "male stoicism is toxic masculinity, it's ok for men to cry" stop puilling this bs out of your ass
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:51 PM
1

I mean, maybe, I've done Muay Thai for a while
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:04 AM
1

boys end up going to jail more and being more violent than girls whether it's more aggression from testosterone, or whatever And more parents is pretty much always worse after 2, because it confuses the children. Now, tight-knit community role models ('uncles', etc) are a good thing usually.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:26 PM
5

Oh trust me bro, I know your ego is the strongest thing about you Damn right, my entire neighborhood had to move out to make space for my ego Except you are the one trying to specify what makes someone masculine and trying to define basic philosophical constructs as masculine or feminine Well yes, if masculinity can be anything then masculinity is nothing. It renders the term meaningless. Sort of the issue TERFS have with trans activists. If anyone can be a woman just being saying it, then the t…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:06 PM
2

It kind of is, two parents is just an abritrary number, why not 3? Why not 4? The value of the two parent dichotomy is one is the masculine rolemodel, and the other is the feminine. Now, it can be that the woman fills the masculine role and the man the feminine, but its rarer. Because men tend to naturally fill the masculine role, a lack of fathers causes deeper problems for boys, because they don't have a role model for their own masculinity. It does cause some issues for girls too though.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:01 PM
8

Shut up, you left wing subversive lmao Just because right wingers didn't stand by their principles enough in the face of the march of leftism (feminists included) doesn't mean they don't oppose it. Particularly now, young right wingers hate feminism with a passion, while boomer right wingers were more ambivalent.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:59 PM
5

Right-wing conservatives care zero about men's rights, Proof? Also right-wingers tend to be feminist allies just like left-wingers. Not even close, at all. The right wing largely considers feminism evil, for good reason. At least left-wingers aren't in the MRM to infiltrate and pretend they are men's rights advocares, That's literally what some leftists do. Now, this subreddit skews more left than right, but guess what? Most ordinary left-wingers care about men's rights than their own political …
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:43 PM
7

Again, you care more about 'winning' vs the right wing than about men's rights. And we're being remarkably charitable here, as well, if anyone can be blamed for the mess feminism has put men in, it's the left. However, pathetic leftist subversives like yourself would rather push your political ideology than actually help men. Speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:31 PM
2

Np! It's good to tease out these things.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:16 PM
8

Exactly!
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:16 PM
6

Np. I was clinically bipolar type II when I was 10-15, but through self-administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy I managed to gain complete control over my emotional state. Now, I basically only feel what I want to when I want to. Of course, for people who didn't have my crazy mood swings and emotional instability, simply practicing maintaining control is often enough, without deliberately curating your own thought patterns. Still, if me, someone who day to day would go from suicidal depression…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:12 PM
5

Sure, but it's a lonely existence when 99% of the left is feminist. And again, the idea that conservatives don't care about men's rights is simply false. Left-wingers who value leftism over men's rights like to attack conservatives as not true defenders of men's rights, and in doing so show they want men's rights to solely be a weapon for their own leftist causes. You don't see right-wingers attacking the left-wingers here as 'feminist adjacent' or something, because conservatives are willing to…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:08 PM
4

I see your stepping way from the topic by relating the flaw to profession. Not at all, you said 'they are good at what they do, except they cry all the time, it's a small flaw', and I simply showed that crying all the time is actually super detrimental to being good at what they do. Ofcourse it depends on what the crying is about but men crying in of itself is no crime. Sure, masterbating 30 times a day isn't a crime, doesn't mean its good for you. And again, it depends what the crying is about.…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:06 PM
3

there's no reason to not do it except the idea that 'it's immature and unmanly'. These kinds of ideas are harmful and prevent men from expressing themselves in situations where it's more beneficial for them to share their feelings. I mean, it's a continuum. We agree on the premise (i.e. a certain degree of emotional control is valuable), we just disagree at which point emotional displays go from appropriate to inapropriate. Which is a subject that we could quibble over for decades. But I'm glad …
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:02 PM
4

It's not about right/left, and that fact you think right-wing conservatives care less about men's rights than left-wing feminists speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:40 PM
-1

I also believe many of them aren't 'feminine' but just don't follow the outdated conservative idea of how men 'should' act, like the 'real men only drink beer' thing. I think you have a massively wrong idea of how conservatives think men should act. Many conservative 'masculine' men don't drink at all (I'm one of them) as they see it as a mark of pride in their own self-possession. The underlying masculine ethos remains the same, and while conservatives try to uphold it, progressives try to tear…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:33 PM
5

If your 'moment of weakness' is crying over spilt milk, that says a hell of a lot about you. Male people are men, however, the masculine ideal is not something men are naturally born with, it is worked towards and achieved. Part and parcel of that ideal is emotional control. people good at what they do except for a little flaw (in this case the flaw is crying) in your book, lol For the most part, people with poor emotional control aren't successful. And crying over spilling your cereal shows a d…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:28 PM
1

Damn bro u still replying?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:24 PM
6

Now you sound like a feminist. It's not about 'bottling up what you feel (i.e. showing no emotion) it's about rationalizing what you feel, and showing appropriate emotion. Look, controlling your emotions is always a good thing, for both men and women. It lets you make rational, wiser decisions, it lets you move in the world more confidently, and it helps a hell of a lot when maintaining relationships. Now, I agree there's a double standard - women are allowed to get away with much less emotional…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:23 PM
1

*Reverse Uno Card* Project much?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:16 PM
5

The comment said it was very cringey and wrong to cry over a movie. It is. I think if a man is passionate about star wars from their childhood and a new movie makes them so emotional and tear up there's nothing wrong with that. It shows a complete lack of emotional control and maturity. There's a stigma surrounding men expressing their emotions inappropriately. No-one's calling a soldier a pussy for crying over his dead comrade.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:13 PM
-9

Well, it kinda is, though. Like, ok, its expressed poorly, but progressive men are much more feminized than conservative men (likely due to the proximity to feminism, among other things). And if you agree that there is some standard for male emotional control, then why is being on the verge of tears in public without a major calamity a good thing?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:11 PM
6

a) bodybuilders are kinda shit at fighting, because they're slow and heavy. The scary fuckers are the lean, chiseled dudes, cause they're quick and brutal b) if a bodybuilding, 6'7 260lb, starts crying over spilling his milk, I have zero fear he'll be able to beat me up. A lot of fighting is the will to hurt, to endure, to aggress. You can be the strongest man in the world, and if you don't have the will you'll lose every time.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:06 PM
-2

Yes, when it's appropriate. Like, how do you not understand this. A 30 year old guy crying because he spilt some milk with his hand over his mouth is weak and pathetic. A 30 year old guy crying because his unit was tortured to death Syria is strong and sympathetic.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:04 PM
6

If you're crying inappropriately (i.e. over the Rise of Skywalker trailer) then you have no emotional control. As I stated in my initial comment, the post is kinda cringe and not really a great example, but the underlying message is true. If you're crying over something inconsequential as a man, you're not living up the masculine ideal.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:02 PM
0

The whole point of prison is to remove people from society lmao Good try though, and you seem to projecting that "i don't want men to be sexually assaulted less than women', pure projection lol, you 'want men to be sexually assaulted more than women' Plenty of things are unique to prison. For example, area homicide statistics don't include prison, for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:57 PM
5

It's not about 'bottling up your emotions', it's about controlling them. Again, completely different things.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:55 PM
55

Actually, according to internal polling, this subreddit is more left than right, which is unsurprising since reddit skews heavily left.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:54 PM
0

Ah, I see you're a close-minded moron who can't even provide evidence. Good work lmao
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:53 PM
2

Exactly, appropriate displays of emotion
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:52 PM
5

Look, you're a bit of an idiot. You can deny reality all you want, but on average there are a series of traits that women find desirable (large muscles, wealth, confidence, controlled aggression, drive, etc) and these tend to converge in the Alpha/Omega male archetypes. Now, the manifestations of these traits might be slightly variable for partner preferences, but if women had no alignment whatsoever towards hyper-competitive, high status men, then hypergamy wouldn't exist. Also, talking about b…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:51 PM
5

Absolutely, and again, if a 'real man' can do be literally anything, then that term is pointless. You might as well say 'male'. Of course, 'real man' and 'real woman' are simply terms for the collection of traits the other gender, on average, finds most attractive in each other.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:48 PM
9

Then you should help your friend learn to control his emotions. Trust me, as a dude who was bipolar, it will make his life way more successful and happy.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:46 PM
4

Well personally I disagree, I think men are allowed to cry and express emotion however they want and it doesn't make them 'less of a man'. That's fine, you're entitled to your opinion. I disagree completely. Besides it's not like people choose when to cry an emotional response we can't really control. Uhhh, yes you can, 100%. Emotional control is something people can work and achieve. Just because you've never tried doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:45 PM
-1

Well, I included that caveat simply because it skews the statistics, and because prison isn't a part of wider society in any meaningful way. Now, you could say with equal utility that within the prison domain, men are much more likely to experience sexual violence and this proves that men have issues that disproportionately affect them.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:44 PM
5

Please explain? How does "repressing your emotions" and "forcing yourself not to cry" help promote mental health? Stoicism is not about 'repressing your emotions'. That's a feminist lie. Traditional masculine behavior is control over your emotions. That means crying when it's appropriate (your buddy died) and maintaining self-possession when it's not (Rise of Skywalker Trailer). No-one likes a guy who's constantly crying. Of course, no-one like a girl who does either, but women have an in-group …
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:41 PM
1

You cite first, I'll cite second if you wanna start a citation war.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:34 PM
1

I mean, we're explicitly talking about the West. I see you have citations, so many citations. And men are much less likely to report sexual assaults, so it's difficult to say which has the most 'shadow' (i.e. hidden) assaults. Your speculation has no basis in reality. Also, for example, women commit 1/3rd of all domestic violence, and 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence. So the idea that women are exclusively and always much more likely to be victims just is another lie.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:33 PM
2

It's trying to yet again displace and erase men and move that space over to women. Just like with everything else, from 'Boy' Scouts having to accept girls (the Girl Guides don't have to accept boys), etc
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:40 PM
2

We actually do, women are at a higher risks of sexual violence outside of prisons. Now, if you want to discuss how legally, men cannot seek redress for sexual violence (i.e. men can't be raped). But don't lie.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:38 PM
4

No, that statistic is a lie. It's more like 0.4% according the FBI bureau of Crime stats.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:38 PM
13

Look, she's not a hero, nor is she a villain.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:36 PM
5

No, in fact boys are hurt the most out of a lack of father model.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:31 PM
-10

While the title is cringe, they are on to something. Man as a concept doesn't simply equal 'male'. Being a man is a series of biologically based psycho-adaptive behaviors that promote mental health and mesh quite tightly with concepts of 'traditional masculinity'. EDIT: Part of traditional masculinity is 'appropriate displays of emotion'. I.e. its more than appropriate to cry over your fallen comrades. It's cringe as shit to cry over the Rise of Skywalker trailer. Male feminists seem to go out o…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:28 PM
1

But they're your male friends. Men are much more forgiving than women about their homies showing weakness.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:18 PM
3

What's being competitive in a healthy way?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:09 AM
1

https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjc.12147 Essentially, therapy is generally is geared towards the female experience (to the point that the APA labeled 'traditional masculinity' as a mental disorder, when it is in fact a natural expression of male psychology). Men don't like talking about their feelings because it makes them feel worse, and instead therapeutic strategies focused on solving the underlying sources of the emotional problems made men feel better. While for …
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:07 AM
1

Have you ever thought that maybe financial uncertainty and the growing gap between the upper and middle class has something to do with it? The absolute level of financial poverty is the lowest it's ever been worldwide. Financial distress is one of the main drivers for Suicide Citation?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:55 AM
3

Feminism hates men, regardless of what individual feminists think. I'm sure there are some Nazis who don't hate Jews. Doesn't matter. The same collectivist substructure that Hitler used to divide Jews and Germans feminists use to divide men and women. This is further proved by the fact James Lindsay published large portions of Mein Kampf as a feminist paper in a peer-reviewed left-wing academic journal simply with 'german' replaced with 'woman' and 'jew' with 'man'. No-one batted an eyelid until…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:53 AM
5

The suicide rate has gone up the more feminism has entrenched its in society. In the 50s the male suicide was much lower. Shocking, the more feminists demonize male nature as evil, the more men feel disenfranchised. From growing up, boys are taught not to cry or show emotion because it’s “weak” and “for girls.” Yes, because it's good for men. Psychologically, men feel worse when talking about their emotions vs doing something, while women are the opposite.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:13 PM
1

Men have the domain of hard power, women have the domain of soft power. Men can be manipulative, but women are instinctively much better at it.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:09 PM
8

I actually think you don't know what you're talking about. Men's Lib is a toxic subversive sub dedicated to making men slaves to an ideology that hates them (feminism). Toxic/Fragile Masculinity is deliberately set up so that men can't win either way. I'm competitive and aggressive: toxic male reeee Woman is competitive and aggressive: you go girl u so empowered
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:09 PM
1

You first, if you wanna start a citation war
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:32 PM
0

Black people are more likely to be arrested for the same crime and receive longer sentences, much more to black men. If you take into account prior criminal history, this gap shrinks entirely. By the same token, white people receive longer sentences for the same crime as Jews. I always knew the protocols of Zion were real! Or...its prior criminal history. They also are arrested for meth usage at a much higher rate than white people. This isn't true. Meth arrests are actually one of the crimes th…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:30 PM
0

I mean, police kill more white men each year than black men. And unarmed police killings of co-operating black suspects is around >20 per year. Black men fill prisons because of a hood culture that sees academic achievement as being a sell-out. No-one's saying where's all the police racism vs jewish, sikh or chinese men.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:00 AM
1

Women have in group preference for women, and an out-group bias against men. Men have an out-group preference for women, and an in-group bias against men. That's how feminism has come so far. Feminism is just gender communism. It's like saying, which powerful elites were behind the rise of the Soviet Union? Nobody, really. It's religious fanaticism. Now, the left-wing authoritarian establishment uses feminism for its own ends, but almost every movement is co-opted by the powerful. Just look at h…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:56 AM
2

The Jews. Just kidding, it's neo-marxists and greedy sociopaths.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:54 AM
1

I had two tactics which I used depending on how I gauged the teacher/class Push back reasonably and gently. I made sure I never mentioned I was anti-feminist, but played the role of the dumb normie confused by the flaws in feminist logic. This was in classes I could get away with it. Embrace it for the meme, and try to come up with the craziest shit you can just to see how far you can push things. My proudest moment at Uni was when I was a super progressive class (not marketed as such, but prof …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:41 AM
0

All news is biased. Anyone telling you otherwise is lying. At least Fox is honest about being the face of the right-wing establishment. Plus nowadays they have 100% less creationism and 500% more Tucker Carlson, so yeah.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:00 AM
2

just chill my dude, life is worth living
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:54 PM
6

clinically, men feel worse when they talk about their feelings vs doing something (excercise, work, etc) while women are the opposite. As per usual, feminism treats men as defective women and then blames them when it doesn't work. The more feminism has destroyed masculine norms the higher the suicide rate has risen. We didn't have these problems back in the 50's. Makes you think...
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:53 PM
2

Feminism can help men too. How? It’s about tackling those stereotypes/gender norms that affect us all negatively. What if I have the view that gender norms reflect biological reality and that trying to tear them down is inherently evil and destructive? Just to take one example, ‘boys don’t cry’ has a massive negative impact. Does it? It could in fact be one of the reasons the suicide rate is so high for young men. It is not. Just doing a historical analysis, the more entrenched male gender norms…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:13 PM
2

What's wrong with Christianity?
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 05:16 PM
3

Don't envy women. You don't envy a spoilt child. They life their life in a negative way. Western civilization has spoilt women, and in turn made women increasingly more miserable. Plus, men still have inherent advantages women never have. Don't compare yourself to other people, compare yourself to who you were yesterday.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 08:44 AM
2

this makes no sense lmao
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 08:39 AM
1

Keep your atheism to yourself please. No-one forced you to open the post
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 08:39 AM
1

Not talking about draft, more like harsher sentencing for similar crimes. I mean, that's the kind of equality I'm behind. Also a voluntary draft with tax benefits isn't really a draft honestly. Semantics, call it what you want.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 06:01 AM
4

If you're talking about a mandatory draft, I'm against that. I am however for a voluntary draft that would provide tax benefits.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:28 AM
1

Well, I wouldn't be for a mandatory draft, but a draft could provide tax benefits to men, just as having children in a 2-parent family could give tax breaks to women (like they do in Hungary).
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:28 AM
1

If you can spend millions on racist lecturing about the evils of the Huwites,what Critical race theory is a very lucrative profession, particularly in the public sector. Well, you're free to take that position. Have fun trying to enforce people to have children. It's very easy; just look at Hungary. I'd been down for a voluntary draft (tax benefits) and the Hungarian model (tax benefits that increase per child you have). Saying that there was "no investment" is just wrong. No, it isn't. I have b…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:46 AM
1

Treatment of vets has not really been too awful. In the west, yes it has been. If you can spend millions on racist lecturing about the evils of the Huwites, you can afford to help vets. And yes, having one gender subject to conscription and not the other is unequal, I would take the traditional position that men and women have different responsibilities. Men have a responsibility to defend the nation; women have a responsibility to have children. Of course, I have a huge amount of sympathy for t…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:18 AM
2

but generally conservatives tend to be more traditional, Yes. which is not what the mrm wants. Proof? Again, 'traditional' in this instance is individualism instead of feminism's collectivist cancer. Things like conscription and gender norms, you would think taking those things down would be more progressive. So is legalizing petty theft and racism. I have zero tolerance for "progressivism", but I would hardly say MRM fits the bill. Progressivism believes in a correct politics that will produce …
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:15 AM
8

who also do not have progressing our movement in their best interests. Citation? I'm a conservative all for "equal rights, equal fights" mentality.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:34 PM
1

It's a key misunderstanding about men. Put simply in brutal economic terms, women provide sex/companionship, men provide protection/resources. Therefore, women are biologically much more sexually selective, since they're protecting one of their 'bargaining chips' (unconsciously, usually). Men are much less sexually selective, because they're looking for sex. HOWEVER, when it comes to long-term relationships, men are very selective, since they're the one protecting one of their 'bargaining chips'…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:18 PM
2

what kind of 'equality'?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:57 PM
6

They do, but they're rare, as all the 'good girls' get quickly snapped up by high value men, which leaves only the toxic entitled bitches for everyone else. Become high value, and you can pick and choose.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:13 PM
1

Nofap isn't a cult, though some of them take it too far with pseudoscience (i.e. semen retention bs). The point of nofap is to get off pornography, not to stop masturbating entirely (though some do). The truth is masterbating doesn't have a lot of negative impacts as far as we know, but pornography absolutely does, both in psychological and physiological ways. Hell, Your Brain on Porn was written by a neuroscientist professor. But I guess it's just 'pseudoscience' huh. Porn is like alcohol. Some…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:43 PM
1

Its trashy and gets super cringe when Cheryl takes over half of Jughead's gang.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 12:46 AM
3

That is, assuming you made any arguments at all, which you have not lol A communist who can't defend communism, what a shock....lmao
/r/MensRights26/06/21 03:39 AM
1

Your comeback game is still weaker than than dan bilzerian on leg day tho, soooo
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:45 AM
3

You keep saying that lol, but haven't proved me wrong, at all get out of here you authoritarian moron lmao
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:44 AM
3

The rich eat the poor so there's really no difference. There's no difference between murdering the rich out of hatred and loving and helping the poor? Damn you're so wise. I guess there's also no difference between feminists hating men and trying to help women. But of course the communists have consistently helped the poor more than anyone Sureeeee....just like feminists have helped women more than anyone. China for example has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty. China is genociding a mi…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:47 AM
1

Damn bro it took you one whole hour to come up with that one lmaoooo
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:41 AM
3

I see you don't know your bible. The quote starts out with 'hating your enemies' but the entire verse is a refutation of that and actually tells you to 'love your enemies'. I think you're the one who needs reading lessons. Full verse for when you learn to read: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[i] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on t…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:39 AM
2

oh shit, its the communist subversive
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:38 AM
1

SEEMS LIKE COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA TO ME
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:00 PM
2

Also like how communist aren't about helping the poor. They just hate the rich.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:57 PM
2

ah yes, got the dates wrong.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:54 PM
3

Because under Intersectionality (which spawned from feminism) there are multiple tiers and dimensions of oppression. So the apex of evil is straight (oppresses gays), white (oppresses blacks), male (oppresses women). So while you might have more moral virtue in their eyes than a straight white male due to you being black, if you got in an argument with a lesbian black woman, you'd be oppressing her. Because despite the fact you're both black, you're male and straight.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:52 PM
2

Nice refutation, retard lmaoooo
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:50 PM
1

Do you seriously think that before Marx came along people who felt they were oppressed really liked being oppressed? And somehow Marx had to "teach" them to not like being oppressed? You're a bit stupid, I can tell. People have risen up against their direct oppressors as individuals since the dawn of time. What Marx came up with was collective guilt and collective punishment. Therefore, if you are a member of the 'oppressor class', even if you've never oppressed anyone personally, you are guilty…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:50 PM
1

No, that passage is about loving your enemies? Marxism is about hating your supposed 'oppressors'.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:45 PM
1

The West pathologizes masculinity and treats boys as defective girls.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:41 AM
1

How is that not surreptitious hatred of women? It's a recognition that women and men fulfill different roles in society. In Catholic Doctrine, the Church itself is actually considered the bride of Jesus Christ, but definitely it hates women and everything feminine. Oh and the fact that one of the most important people in Christian mythology was a woman? God forbid that men have spaces that only men can inhabit, and women have spaces only women can inhabit. Oh yeah, except if you're the boy scout…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:39 AM
1

Just because the leaders of a misogynistic religion say that they don't hate women, doesn't make it true. Definitely not an insane strawman...at all... And of course, you just know that Catholicism hates women and has brainwashed them into obedience, but if all those women were just as smart as you, they'd see the light and realize that you know what's best for women. After all, women don't need choices or agency. They have you to tell them what's oppression and not.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:32 AM
1

The majority of Conservative Judeo-Christians in the US. Proof? This is one hell of a claim.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:31 AM
1

Religion is fucking scary, and no, it's not always an active choice. You seem to have a hate on for the weird ass religious people, but Catholicism/Protestantism laid the foundations for all the rights and moral enlightenment we have now. And without religion, you end up with Fascism, Intersectionality, Communism and piles of corpses, just as Nietzsche predicted. There will always be weirdos seeking to reject modern society, whether that's through religion, anarchism, primitivism, or whatever. E…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:30 AM
1

Yeah no, feminism is Marxist cancer that treats gender relations as a zero-sum game. Nice try, though. Just be glad that MRA is not the counterpoint to feminism, aka the weird male gender Marxist movement the Male Collective. Feminism hates men and views them as the enemy. And you don't surrender to people like that. Go wave your cowardly white flag somewhere else.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:25 AM
4

It's complicated, but basically feminism is a marxist movement that views men as oppressors (as a class) and women as the oppressed (as a class) both historically and in the present. A central tenet of Marxism is that it's not just ok, but morally good to hate your oppressors (men). Furthermore, in the education system and most other areas of life, feminism has made society view men as defective girls, so if you show masculine traits you are a threat to be crushed. For example, the APA (American…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:17 AM
1

Well now they would know since you said it instead of private messaging me these particular details. It wouldn't matter either way, the far-left Intersectional types will comb through your profile to try and destroy your life, particularly if you live in LA. Allegations can be manufactured, and I would would never, ever post on here with anything linking back to me. You underestimate the hatred and malice these people have for their ideological enemies.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 01:43 AM
1

I'm not religious and I am not getting religious on anyone, but I am trying to extract some kind of meaning from this premise as I am progressing through the book. It seems as though narcissism is on the rise in modern society due to influence of social media and the loss of the influence of religion in our societies. Yes. and that all sins will be punished, This is a religious view. I'm religious (Catholic), but this is a very Abrahamic view. but I am not sure if they will always be punished in…
/r/MGTOW213/06/21 02:07 AM
4

This levels shit is cringe bro MGTOW is a perspective on life. Which path you choose is your choice, and nothing to do with MGTOW
/r/MGTOW213/06/21 02:03 AM
1

And you'd be wrong. Workers owning the means of production is one of the many solutions that Marx posits towards solving the core idea of Marxism, which is the poor are universally oppressed by the rich.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:53 PM
1

It is the core of Marxism, which you could also describe as collectivism. Besides, one of the four streams of modern feminism is literally called "Marxist Feminism", in that it's also explicitly marxist as well as being implicitly marxist.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 09:00 PM
1

Feminism has a Marxist substructure. Where Marx divided the oppressor/oppressed class dichotomy on class lines (i.e. all the poor are innocent, moral victims, and all the rich are evil oppressors), feminism does exactly the same thing on gender lines.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:52 PM
2

Not really, but I think he mentions the statistics on gender divergence in his lectures sometimes. But he draws them from a multi-national study in gender preferences in workplaces that has been replicated multiple times.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:50 PM
1

Sure, but if you want various peer-reviewed studies on the neuroscience of it, you can look at: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/about/about-us/ It analyzes the science of it. It's a disclaimer since it's so easy to sue people in the US lol
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:48 PM
1

By your logic that statement is false, as it's not causation. Bro holy shit you're actually retarded lmao I'll just leave this here: maybe learn what scientific terms mean so that you can actually understand what scientific studies are telling you. You'll lose less arguments that way.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:57 AM
6

It being 0,5% does not make it less worth of a fight. Just the same as false rape claims are negligible towards unpunished rape, but it's still worth the fight for us to make them as punishable as rape. Well, you can't remove individual choice. You will never completely eradicate sexism or racism, but you can limit its influence. Besides, 99.5 cents on the dollar pay gap doesn't sound bad. The largest pay gap is between personality types on trait assertiveness. Assertive people get paid wayy, wa…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:55 AM
1

Mate, you're actually thick lmao "Controls" are "control study", and are you stupid, it's literally a peer-reviewed study. BTW to anyone reading this, he's paraphrasing and writing his own "Quotes" as the link half the wording his reply contains. You're just straight lying lmao, I literally just copy-pasted it from my last link I posted above: https://www.getroman.com/health-guide/masturbation-ejaculation-prostate-cancer/ And your second link is literally saying it finds an association. That is …
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:42 AM
12

And that's one of the falsest statements ever. In my former company, This is an anecdote. It has no bearing on general trends. Sexism accounts for maybe 0.5% of the difference on the generous side. Temperament and career choice account for the rest. I can dig deeper into the science behind it if you want (In my first year in Economics, we went through the entire discrepancy as an example of examining statistics), but suffice to say that sexism is a tiny factor compared to the rest. Every woman I…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:37 AM
2

"Lmao, deleted what?" Your retarded reply to me, where you actually didn't even read two sentences. Stop using acid, you trippin lol, I didn't delete shit Learn to literally read before you actually speak? Because you sound like an actual retard trying to somersault over a study by playing word games Well, all I have are your quotes, given I don't wanna pay Harvard money, dumbass lmao Here are some counter-factuals you might (or likely might not) read: 1: A 2008 study published in BJUI Internati…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:26 AM
1

Dude just deleted his comment telling me I don't know how to read studies, and then confirmed that it's not correlation by copy pasting the first part of my quote. Lmao, deleted what? "Linked" means correlated. It's plebeian language for people like you. "Caused" is causational language. Learn to read scientific studies before you quote them, ty.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:12 AM
2

You really don't understand how to read scientific studies, do you. Correlation does not equal causation. That's the first thing they drill into your head in any intro Stats class. All the prostate cancer studies found correlational links, not causational ones. There's a correlational link between the number of tomatoes imported to the UK and the amount of couples married there that year. Doesn't mean we start praying for the tomato harvest to see more families. The scientists found no evidence …
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:04 AM
-2

Not at all. It's to show the people who are addicted to porn and masturbating and don't know it the truth of their situation. Also, more self-control is always a good thing.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:56 AM
0

Porn is terrible for you, even in mild use. I'm a MGTOW who lives monk mode with total self control, and I've never felt happier. I wouldn't recommend not masturbating for everyone, but porn is just terrible for your psyche. And the studies that link reduced risk of prostate cancer with masturbation only have a correlational link, not a casautional one. If you followed every correlational study, then you'd be praying to the tomato harvest for more married couples in the UK. EDIT: But to say that…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:55 AM
16

Men can't really talk about wage gap or insecurity because we don't really suffer from this The wage gap doesn't exist because of sexism. It exists because women choose careers that pay less. I'm 100% sure that most feminists do fight for equality, but the ones we hear about What makes you think that? Feminist doctrine going back to 2nd wave feminism has been about female supremacy in the form of equity (i.e. equal outcomes when it benefits women). The underlying substructure of feminism since t…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:45 AM
3

Find a purpose and cultivate your personal masculinity. There is nothing feminists hate more than a strong man who refuses to bow before them and is enjoying life. Work out, learn how to fight, do physical activity, cultivate mental strength and emotional control. I would also recommend going MGTOW, but it's not for everyone. Ignore feminist rhetoric, liars are liars. Contest them were you feel you can get away with it, but ultimately don't let them get to you. There is so much more to life than…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:14 PM
1

Bro, women and dating, and particularily marriage are just not worth it. Go MGTOW and never look back. You'll be happier.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:10 PM
1

It's about power. Feminism doesn't really care about women all that much, it cares about their ideology. Just look at how they treat women who aren't feminists. It's a totalitarian ideology trying to suppress all opposition. You are opposition, and thus you are an evil misogynist.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:49 PM
18

The argument isn't about 'trauma' or something. There are plenty of stories of men telling the police about their female abusers, only for the woman to say the same thing about the man. And society will always side with woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter