TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

D_Luffy_32 Archive

View 2 posts and 303 comments by D_Luffy_32 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
81

FeminismD_Luffy_32/r/MensRights12/05/23 02:50 AM
0

Activism/SupportD_Luffy_32/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:28 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

He added 8.4 trillion dollars to our debt; Inflation increased under Biden significantly (the democrats ironically posted a graph on X confirming this) To get us out from under covid. The whole world had increased inflation trying to get out of covid. He also brought I back down by the end of his presidency. allowed in millions of illegal immigrants which created more job competition. Except he didn't? That's just a complete lie. Ask yourself this. What policy or action allowed illegal immigrant…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:22 PM
-2

How is you being unable to afford buying land the president's fault?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:44 PM
-2

How so? He stopped us from having a recession because of covid, bounced us back faster than any other country, and our foreign relations were great.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:43 PM
-18

What's ironic is the economy and international relations do better under democrats too. So it's really more of vibes based thing than anything else
/r/MensRights18/08/25 06:55 PM
54

Kind of unrelated but one of the things that you mentioned really speaks to the issues with feminism. And that's positive masculinity. I've asked many feminists what is positive masculinity as opposed to toxic masculinity. Because they often claim that they're not saying all masculinity is toxic. But when they explain what kind of masculinity isn't toxic. It's always either traditional feminine traits like taking care of kids or in the service of women like protecting their wives. Basically to a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 06:28 PM
1

Again. If DNA evidence is contaminated and mishandled it is allowed to be rejected. Not every bit of evidence is automatically allowed in court
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:29 PM
1

They already had proved beyond a reasonable doubt the crime had occurred. He was already In prison. This was an appeal for him to be let out because new DNA evidence was found but it had issues. Guess what Harris did after this case? She put in more protections on how evidence is handled to ensure that there aren't issues with future evidence. She was just following the laws.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:06 PM
-6

Because I know the facts? Since when are facts bootlicking?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 01:05 AM
-19

Op. To answer the question no this is a lie. Shes actually argued for more reforms than harsher punishment. The whole "to keep people working" has to do with a firefighter program inmates can do by choice and get skills to become a firefighter when they get out of prison.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:09 PM
-12

Nope. That's not what happened. There were issues with the DNA evidence they wanted to provide being contaminated. She refused because it wouldn't be an accurate test. It had nothing to do with trying to keep him in prison
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:07 PM
1

How so what? I said multiple things
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:05 PM
1

I think you're confusing women with feminists. This is about supporting women's rights. Not about supporting feminism. Not only because we should be supporting equal rights for everyone. But also because it benefits men's rights to put our money where our mouth is and show that we are better than feminism. We actually care about men's rights and women's rights. We gain more support when people see that. For example Casey Jay. She was a feminist who became a supporter of men's rights when she rea…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 11:52 AM
1

Who's they?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:08 PM
0

Millions more would be dead if we didn’t. Based on what evidence? You’re really gonna talk about gun control laws? To an American who knows the importance of gun rights? I'm asking you to figure out why some rights are okay take away and why others are not? Do you believe people have a right to kill trespassers on their property?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:54 PM
0

But millions would be alive if we didn't have guns? Where do you draw the line?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 08:20 PM
2

What misunderstanding about dead bedrooms?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:55 PM
2

Yeah that would fine, but that's not what op is suggesting. He's saying to stop paying bills. And financially providing at all.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:02 PM
2

This would be even more so financial abuse In a nuclear family. If he's the sole provider he's not only abusing his wife but also his kids. There's more than one type of intimacy. Even if she witholds sex I'm not saying she should also not care for their kids or care for her partner at all. If he simple says, okay I won't buy you jewelry or take you out on dates that's fine. But forcing your partner to suddenly take on the bills when they are already taking care of the house and kids with no job…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:41 PM
1

Yes I did. Did you?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:33 PM
0

So you're pro life is what I'm hearing. So you must also be for banning guns right?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:32 PM
0

That's a funny image you made up in your head. Not surprised you laughed lol. But no that's not what I'm saying. Forcing your partner to take on all the financial responsibility in order to blackmail them into sleeping with you is financially abusive.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:30 PM
0

Yup it can be. However for the 4b they are protesting misogynistic laws. Not trying force their partner like op is suggesting to do.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:27 PM
1

Did you respond to the wrong person? This has nothing to do with what I said.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:26 PM
2

Huh? How so?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:25 PM
1

I explained in another comment that it can be abuse if used in the same way as financial abuse. But if you're asking which abuse is it classified as it can be either emotional or psychological abuse depending on how it's used. But to remind you that the 4b is neither.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:24 PM
1

If you withhold sex because you're trying blackmail your partner into doing something. That's also abuse. However the 4b no sex is about protesting misogynistic laws. Not trying to control your partner.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:21 PM
-1

Exactly. Just leave the relationship not financially abuse them.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:17 PM
0

You think divorce doesn't need a court? Also, exactly. same thing goes for the guy, if he doesn't like her not wanting to have sex in protest. Leave the relationship. Why do you need to abuse your partner?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:17 PM
-34

Suggesting people financially abuse their partners because they can't have sex isn't standing up for men. They're right it's quite literally incel behavior.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:52 AM
-20

Nobody said she's owed money. But forcing all the financial responsibility on your partner as blackmail is financial abuse. She's protesting misogynistic laws and beliefs, if he doesn't like that he can leave the relationship instead of basically threatening her to give up her body. That's like telling women to baby trap MGTOW men and force them to pay child support. Which is also financial abuse.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:49 AM
1

The left have been calling Trump a fascist threat to democracy. Because he is. That's not propaganda that's a fact. all I did was check the election results and refresh my memory on the amendment process. The same constitution trump said he wanted to suspend lol
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:52 AM
-1

Wait, what do you think the 4b movement is?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:03 AM
1

Neither have I, the left is saying everything will be okay. You seem to be deep throating the wright's propaganda
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:13 PM
7

I think it's interesting to say 4b is punishing men when it's the same as MGTOW. I don't think either is sexist
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:47 PM
1

You naive child. Well I'm glad you have faith in a system that Republicans want to destroy.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:44 PM
1

So now that president's have criminal immunity. You don't see any possibility for a president to remove people in order to get what they want?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:45 AM
1

Quick question, do you think we should remove the second amendment and make it a states right to decide? Also no president has had criminal immunity. Obama sought legal counsel to ensure what he was planning on doing was allowed by the president as commander. Trump was told repeatedly that he would be breaking the law. And he did it anyway.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:20 AM
1

Lol I meant yes he is anti abortion. I was multi-tasking when I wrote that. But to answer your question. Where do you get that crap that Trump is a threat to the female right to vote? Because there are republicans in power who want to repeal the 19th. They can do that if trump keeps stacking the Supreme Court with his people. They already did it with abortion and immunity. These are insane unconstitutional cases. That only got put in place because of trump.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:54 AM
1

His formal position is not anti abortion. You call people Dumbo but say the dumbest takes. Projecting much?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:51 AM
1

Ironic considering you can't argue against my point
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:49 AM
1

When did I say feminists? I said women
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:07 AM
1

Why do you think they're an outline?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:49 AM
0

If you truly believe that, why are there women men's rights activists?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:07 AM
1

Yeah it has, where do you think the spike in the red pill and men's rights came from?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:55 AM
0

When did I say anyone was entitled to anything? I said it was important and beneficial to men's rights
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:49 AM
1

You think feminists want equality? Also no Republicans are trying to take away people's rights especially women's. Men's rights losses when Republicans are in power.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:04 PM
0

I agree, your logic is stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:27 PM
0

Yeah cause I thought you were having a conversation about the topic not bringing up random things. It seemed like you were saying I said that. But nope, you couldn't handle the conversation so you changed it lol Edit it's not even the same person lmao. What are you even arguing about?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:25 PM
0

Oh so you were just deflecting the conversation. What does that have to do with what I said?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:16 PM
1

Oh so we're moving the goalpost now. Now it's not women don't, only non mra women don't. By that logic we could use this post as proof non feminist men don't support abortion.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:06 PM
-1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:43 PM
0

https://youtu.be/JRdq2zqGxgY?si=zi9QS3InN_gYPQfM One through three
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:42 PM
1

Suporting women with a "zero sum mentality" doesn't benefit everyone. I agree. That's why I made this post. This isn't a zero sum mentality. Second. This isn't just about abortion, this is also about voting rights. But specifically about your claim about abortion. It means less SAFE abortions. We've already had people die because of roe v wade being overturned. This is about more than just protecting their rights, these rights save lives.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:39 PM
1

Who said men don't need any?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:12 PM
-1

First off, no he didn't. He refuses to answer that question and his actions show otherwise. Second it's not just abortion, there are republicans in power who want to get rid of their right to vote. Speaking of law there was zero reason for Dobbs to go that way either than Trump stacking the Supreme Court. Using the Dobbs case as reference the 2nd amendment would also become a state issue not a federal one.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:59 AM
1

First off, not a feminist. Second, this isn't feminism vs conservatives. It's conservatives vs women and men. Lack of abortion rights harm men too. I'm not expecting feminism to turn around and praise mrm. But supporting women benefits everyone.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:54 AM
-4

I'm not sure, that sounds like a personal issue. I'm saying this in support of men's rights. Women losing their rights hurts us too.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:47 AM
1

Are you saying there is no women who support men's rights?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:44 AM
-2

Are you saying there are no women who fight for men's rights?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:43 AM
-2

Which ones? The right to defend one's property, and the right to vote. Feminists have made it very clear, time and time again, So do you just do whatever feminists tell you to do? I'm not doing this for feminist approval. This is for the defense of women.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:41 AM
-1

Okay so you're not going to clarify so I'll do broad strokes. Trump has the power to put in more supreme court justices who would be willing to further take away protections of women's rights. This includes voting rights. Will he be able to do that? I hope not, I hope we have republicans willing to stand up against it. Will he try? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:00 AM
-1

Are you asking if trump is able to unilaterally do it? Are you asking if trump wants to do it? What are you asking here?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:32 AM
1

None, I'm for men's rights lol, however if republicans in power get their way it'll be the right to vote.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:13 AM
-2

How am I deflecting? I just asked you a question
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:08 AM
0

Yeah that's why we should support their rights.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:07 AM
0

Are women done?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:04 AM
-1

What does this have to do with what I said?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:04 AM
1

I'm not moving the goalpost. If you asked me if I ate the last cupcake and I said, everyone knows I didn't eat the cupcake. Was that answering your question?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:35 AM
1

The ones you said you'd have to fight for yourself.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:34 AM
1

Notice how he doesn't say he's against it. But says "everyone knows". You realize that's not the same thing right?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:32 AM
1

How is minding your business fighting for your own rights?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:29 AM
0

Not going to go over the rest of the nonsense. But their rights already got taken away because of trump the first time he was a elected. Why would they expect anything different this time?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:28 AM
1

49% of women who voted for Trump thought Trump was pro choice.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:02 AM
-6

Women not having abortion means men are going to be worse off. Now you can't come to an agreement with your partner to get one if you both want it. You're forced to pay child support for sure now.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:01 AM
-14

First off he never said that. Second I'm getting my information directly from those people in power who advocate for this
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:00 AM
1

So you'll be asking for special privileges for yourself?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:58 AM
-2

That's why I said feminism/women. Feminism as a whole won't but having individuals in feminism who do will happen and does happen
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:58 AM
2

I'd rather someone who's more likely to help men who insults me rather than someone who's going to make things worse for men who doesn't. But maybe it's because I'm not soft.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:56 AM
-17

In America there are Republicans in power who want to take away abortion rights and the right to vote.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:51 AM
0

Why should anyone fight for your rights?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:47 AM
-7

Then don't ever expect women/feminism to support men's rights. We have an opportunity to prove we care about everyone's rights. Throwing that away is only going to harm men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:46 AM
-5

You think we should fight for equality by taking away rights instead of giving everyone the same rights? Also that's not how it works.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:45 AM
0

You don't feel like fighting for anyone elses rights?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:43 AM
-1

Do you think saying, fuck you we won't fight for your rights until we have ours would make them support ours? Are we the same as feminists or better than them?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:42 AM
0

I can't speak for everyone but I know someone with this exact view. He prioritizes money in his pocket over abortion. This is a big issue and mras should be pissed about people having less rights
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:34 AM
-8

I 1000% disagree, this had nothing to do with gender politics. Trump had less votes than last time, the problem was we were not united on a single issue. Not to mention Russian interference
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:03 AM
17

I think people forget that the best role models have flaws, learning from someone else's mistakes and flaws is equally important as learning from their skills and success. For me I learned a lot from my parents, not what to do, but what not to do.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:30 PM
3

That's the crazy part to me, to feminists women having it rough is a biproduct of society treating them like shit, men having it rough is men being failures since they have it "easier". I've seen a feminist argue that men have everything handed to them and only suffer because of themselves.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:14 PM
0

I didn't say they were in a hospital, I'm saying there's times you're not allowed to film things for a reason. Since you're banking so heavily on his videos being important. Also Can you tell me how he brok the law, which law? Do you not know the case you're defending? He broke the law that it is illegal for planned parenthood to do. Do you know what entrapment is?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:11 PM
1

While theres a lot wrong with what you said, I'm confused how it it's "incentive" to sell a biproduct of giving abortion as an option. Vs hospitals making a huge profit on pregnancy when it's not an option.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:50 PM
0

How is breaking the law a part of his job? You realize it's illegal to secretly record in hospitals for a reason right?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:46 PM
0

What is the bs? This was what Trump was in court for and was found guilty of lol. Are you saying the courts are wrong?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:43 PM
2

Basically policy's take time to happen and a lot of the bad stuff people said would happen has already happened like our abortion rights being taken away with roe v wade being overturned, but also things are currently being voted on like the ability to prevent people from going to other states to get abortions where they allow it. Trump often lies about what he says he's going to do but then supports policies that do exactly what he said he wasn't going to do. It's basically scapegoating by clai…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:41 PM
7

I would look into project 2025 for what their future plans are, but the right has already made a big push to get rid of abortion rights, they want to get rid of birth control and other contraceptives including sex Ed. And many prominent political figures have stated that they want to get rid of women's voting rights. A lot of their plans in project 2025 also harm men's rights as well
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:14 PM
3

Wanting a recount isn't trying overturning an election. Trying to violently force your vice president to falsify votes is
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:08 PM
0

Not to mention how is that Harris's fault he broke the law and got arrested? Lol
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:06 PM
0

She put journalists in jail for doing their job, btw Can you give a source for that? That's news to me
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:05 PM
1

The funniest part is they basically tell you to get on your knees and beg for forgiveness and that you have seen the error of your ways lol
/r/MensRights30/06/24 06:27 PM
35

What's crazy is that if you show them the exact same statistic numbers but in the other direction they'll still say it's sexism towards women. Perpetual victims
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:18 PM
1

Yea, as a Christian white woman in the 1800s, yea, I’m willing to bet she wasn’t exactly repping third wave feminism or gender abolitionism. Well then you might want to do some research into her because she's a fascinating social reformist. An early feminist before the term was used. Fighting for women's rights during marriage and in divorce. You'd be surprised. And I don’t even know what you’re trying to imply with that last comment Let me ask you this. Would you rather only get to see your chi…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 02:17 AM
1

The tender years doctrine arose as a result of traditional gender roles, a patriarchal creation. So did Caroline Norton, the social reformist who created the tender years doctrine, have patriarchal gender roles in mind when she introduced it? Isn’t it MRAs like u that try to argue that feminists want to erode traditional gender roles? No you're thinking of someone else. Traditional gender roles harm men because it's about self sacrifice for men. all you’re doing is providing justification as to …
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:29 AM
1

See that's the problem with feminism and why men's rights activists exist. Feminism pushes the narrative that it's patriarchy's fault that women get primary custody rights. When in reality if you look at the history of it, it's feminism pushing the "tender years doctrine". Which later became the "best interests of the child". Its crazy how they have to lie about their actions when it benefits them and negatively affects men. Because they're not really pushing for equality like they claim. Do a l…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 11:57 PM
1

I also don't entirely see the point in its existence? As other people have stated some of the issues men's rights activists are trying to fix are outright perpetuated by and or created by feminism. Such as unfair paternal rights in courts which is a by product of early feminism pushing for women to have main custody. Men's rights also exists to stand for issues that feminists will say "until x y and z are done it's not a priority" such as male suicide, male homelessness, male incarceration etc. …
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:35 PM
34

That's what I do. It usual ends up getting a snarky response and a block from them.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:48 AM
2

The problem is that when there is an issue society uses men to advertise the perpetrator and women as the victim even if statistically it's the opposite. Take homelessness for example, most ads talk about how many women and children are homeless despite the vast majority being men.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:59 PM
147

They couldn't "own" certain things in the sense they weren't responsible for it. If they had their husbands money they could open loans and not pay them off because it was the husbands responsibility to pay for it. Same if they have crashed their car.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:05 PM
36

Honestly talking to feminists it seems more like projecting than they don't see themselves that way. They secretly want to get rid of men's rights and give women more rights. So they assume men's rights movement is the same for women's rights
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:05 PM
1

It reminds of the "what would you do if you were the last woman on earth" question a while back. All these women being like "I'm not gonna be a rape slave so suicide it is, men wouldn't understand" like as if it wouldn't be the same for men too.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 05:09 PM
14

It's also funny because it so perfectly fits the idea that women make awful choices and choose bad guys over good guys. They'd rather spend time with a predator and risk being killed than take the 0.01% chance that the man is a psychopath
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:12 PM
1

It's more based on successful reversals percentage being similar but yeah.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:36 AM
10

Equally as permanent as getting your tubes tied
/r/MensRights04/03/24 05:19 AM
7

Yeah, getting a home after divorce. That's why they just take the house in the divorce. I'm sure it's harder to get a second house than to get the first one lol
/r/MensRights22/01/24 05:37 PM
-16

I'm not saying it's limited to stds I'm saying that's what is was created for. Most hetero men want a CIS woman. That is a fact. "Most people are transphobic. That's a fact." wow breaking news lol. Failing to tell someone that you had gender reassignment surgery is DECEPTION Do you consider it rape by deception to not tell your partner you have breast implants or had your appendix removed? Also FORCING them to marry transgender(ed) women by deception is rape by deception. Nobody is forcing anyon…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:50 PM
-48

There are laws already for this. It's about stds and not trans people because there is no deception. Trans women are women.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 07:38 PM
1

So like 1% of men.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:44 PM
1

What do you classify as invisible vs non-invisible men?
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:30 PM
1

As someone who's been friends with a lot of women my whole life, I can garuntee women are more likely to notice someone that is just living their life than someone simping after them. It's not 0-100% but it's going to increase your chances. Being mopy and depressed all the time will absolutely kill your chances of being noticed though.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:03 PM
1

Unless she's terminally online women will still notice men around her. But I agree most men are invisible to women. Like I said most men are lonely. Showing that you don't need her attention makes her want your attention.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 08:51 PM
2

True
/r/MensRights06/01/24 08:45 PM
1

I disagree entirely. Often times what happens is the moment you're not lonely because you finally found someone is when more women start taking interest in you. It's nothing to with gender roles dating apps and promiscuity. Most people want to get married and have a family already. But society doesn't allow for it because it's not affordable and we're all overworked and under paid. So fixing loneliness on a personal level first more often then not leads to a romantic one. As stereotypical as it …
/r/MensRights06/01/24 07:58 PM
6

This 100%. Simps absolutely ruin a healthy fun dynamic when they start inviting and flirting with every girl they meet. And what's worse is the women will leave the group because of it and say it's sexist because Joe shmo wouldn't stop sending her dick pics.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 07:48 PM
1

I think one big issue people forget about is social media. We live in a digital age combined with increased workload. And we don't have as much time to hang out with our friends as we used to especially after graduating. It's kind of defeating to see a female friend open snapchat and they're ignoring 10+ messages meanwhile you're lucky to have one. Granted it's mostly unsolicited flirting and whatnot but nobody forces them to not block or not accept those friend requests. Simply knowing multiple…
/r/MensRights06/01/24 07:43 PM
3

Pretty much, she just kept repeating the "patriarchy hurts men too" line. Which I guess is better than one feminist I argued with who just said "good now you know how we feel"
/r/MensRights06/01/24 04:12 AM
4

I could see it. It's just an overall fucked country when it comes to laws for both men and women. It's just that the more that laws suck for women the more they suck for men
/r/MensRights05/01/24 11:15 PM
5

But that's why we should be focusing on dismantling the patriarchy it hurts men and women!!! /s Nah but for real. I went over the stats with a feminist and under a supposedly misogynistic patriarchy women are doing better on almost all fronts. Which by their own definition was the opposite of what patriarchy meant.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 10:52 PM
56

Remember, it's not women's self control that keeps men from being killed by their partner. It's their ability to do so.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:04 AM
5

This was in the meta verse right? Where the graphics are worse than BO2?
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:05 AM
2

Ahh the classic "I suddenly don't know what an analogy is and only understand literal 1 to 1 comparisons because it's convenient" argument. Or as I like to call it , the feminist chocolate fallacy.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:21 AM
12

True that, they complain about women being murdered while saying it's okay for men to be sent to their grave in war
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:22 PM
7

Kind of, not the same way as other countries, I'm in America where it's required on request. Not like Isreal for instance, where you have to spend a certain number of years.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:18 PM
13

I don't know if they were a man or a woman, I didn't ask
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:14 PM
56

I remember being just sad and disappointed after arguing with a feminist one time. I brought up that it's always women and children first, that we're expected die, and how is that equality. And they said the only reason that policy was put in place was because men would shove past people to get to life boats. They were trying to argue that men not being okay with dying was a bad thing. That a man simply wanting to live was somehow disgraceful.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:00 PM
5

An older but interesting example is the wreck it Ralph movie, fix it Felix takes a literal beating from Calhoun to make the laughy taffy vines come down. I wonder if people would've thought it equally as funny if the roles were reversed and he was beating her.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:59 AM
19

Imagine if men did the same thing since men make less tips in the service industry. And it's a "you had a male server pay gap fee" lol
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:16 PM
1

Mechanics have a reputation of trying to rip off anyone and everyone they can. I knew a mechanic who took his car in for a simple but tedious problem he didn't want to bother fixing at home. So he took it to a shop and they tried to add on a bunch of other repairs that "had to get done" and he was like nah, I just replaced half of what you said and the other is still good, just fix the one thing I said and I'll be on my way.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:12 PM
7

Ironically every time I've asked a feminist what they want to do for a career, it's never politician, president, ceo, or anything they complain about there not represented in. It's almost like most women would rather have a rewarding job rather than a high paying job
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:34 PM
4

That's because women lose options as they get older and make more money, whereas the opposite is true for men. It's kind like how people will be responsible with money but once they win the lottery or get a big inheritance they often go into debt. Temptation based on abundance is normal for people. That is why people like Kevin Samuels will tell both men and women to think realistically rather than over inflating themselves. He's not advocating for people cheating, he's just pointing out the rea…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 04:49 PM
6

What's interesting is for men money will often help facilitate them finding love. But for women it doesn't work that way. So they by trying to imitate men they lose out on the good things about being a woman.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:22 AM
10

I explained something very similar to a feminist recently. Specifically in the workplace, men tend to make "inappropriate" jokes and comments to each other. Then when women enter the workplace they call getting treated equally as inequality and harassment. I even had this happen to me. I was a manager who got told I was treating the female staff too harshly/unfairly. Despite several of the women saying I just treat them equally as the men.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:54 AM
1

Why is it that feminists complain that they should be able to wear whatever they want without being stared at and they don't wear it for attention yet when you see pictures of women only gyms they're always wearing the most safe for work workout clothes? It's always just basic sweats and a tank top. No ass crack booty shorts and a revealing top.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:36 PM
7

I once brought it up that people have no issue with older women dating younger men and they straight up said that "it's a different power dynamic" because he's a man he holds more power. That a woman dating younger is on equal footing somehow
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:45 PM
0

Lol that's what I thought. Ya'll make these ridiculous claims yet can't back anything you say up. Not everyone lives in this post-modernist fantasy-land where reality is subjective Ironically that's exactly what you're doing. Everything I said is a fact lol.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:07 AM
1

So then what's this about? Attracting someone you don't love into a relationship is abuse. Your ideology is callous. And whats your point about Attraction and attractiveness are non-negotiable. It's biology. This?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:04 AM
1

But your definition of bigotry includes treating trans people differently in regards to sexual selection How so? All people discriminate when choosing who to have sex with and most of the time it's based on characteristics where discrimination is usually not tolerated Such as? Yet here you are, insisting one form of discrimination is bigotry and another is not. Again how so? You didn't answer the question. I'll just assume you don't think being a bigot is shameful then. I did answer your questio…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:31 AM
0

No. Trans women are people who were born male and now identify as women (and are still male). That's a common misconception. Have you ever heard of AFAB or AMAB? They aren't born male, they're ASSIGNED male. Because doctors just go off of genitalia. But that's not only thing that makes someone male or female. Getting old is also not a different gender... When did I say it was? I agree testosterone is a controlled substance, that goes for cis and trans men. Cis men take testosterone when they get…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:00 PM
0

but have you considered that the vast majority of the world does not agree with you? Agree with me on what? That's socialogy is "literal science"? Because sorry to break it to you but, the vast majority of the world agrees that socialogy is science lol. The pendulum will swing back in America eventually and you will be forced to alter your dogmatic thinking to whatever you are told to think next. You aren't worth my time. Lol that's what I thought. You people scream dogma but can't back up anyth…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:02 PM
0

Because that is literal science based in reality. Because the word gender was just an analog for sex until liberals hijacked it recently. Since when is social science or socialogy not "literal science"? Lol There are so many holes in the entire ideology and if you can't recognize that after careful examination then you are unintelligent, not living in reality, or both. Lol such as?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 06:18 PM
0

Gender does not exist. There is only sex. Lol why do you think that?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:13 PM
0

Well, they are. Sex and gender are not the same thing, you know? Of course they're not. But trans women are biologically female. and the need to alter their sexual characteristics in order to better align with their gender identity People do that all the time, even cis people. Cis women getting breath implants alter their sexual characteristics to align with their gender. And cis men will take testosterone as they get older to better align with their gender identity
/r/MensRights10/07/23 04:23 PM
1

What about it?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 04:19 PM
0

Not wanting to sleep with a male is perfectly okay See, that's what I'm talking about. You're under the transphobic misconception that a trans woman is male, when they are not. Unless you're just talking about all males like trans men. But to figure out which one, ask yourself, would you sleep with a trans man?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 09:24 AM
0

Why don't you tell me what the principle is? Don't hide your bigotry/pedophilia behind "preferences". Like I said in my original comment You don't think being a bigot is shameful? Since when is being a bigot a sexual preference? Lol
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:33 AM
0

It's what you get if you apply your principle equally, Lol no it isn't. That's why I asked where you got that idea from. What do you think the principle I'm talking about is? "All I did was shame people for their sexual preferences." What you are doing is the same as saying homosexuality is a sin. Please explain your reasoning. How am I shaming people for their sexual preference? You can't change someones sexuality by calling them a bigot. When did I say you could?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:40 AM
1

I don't consider them big words. But since you can't make sense of them maybe you need a dictionary. Lol.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:08 AM
1

Lol you don't have to believe me. But it's true. I'm especially fun at weddings
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:06 AM
1

Attracting someone you don't love into a relationship is abuse. Your ideology is callous. Lol what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:05 AM
0

I've been told I'm the light of party a few times. And that I'm a good dancer. Twister not so much. I'm not very flexible. I've got decent upper body strength though lol.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:56 AM
1

Lol did I use too many big words for you? Need me to simplify it to help you understand?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:54 AM
1

Sexism is incredibly common in sexual preference. Do you think everyone who isn't Bi is some sort of bigot? Huh? No, where did that idea come from? A woman is by definition an adult. There's no such thing as an underage woman. Well duh. But I'm talking about pedos who say they like "younger women" but include 16 yo in that group. Who and by what criteria someone chooses to have sex with is none of your business. When did I ever say it was? All I said is don't pretend like you're not a bigot when…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:09 AM
0

don't get why you have a problem with people having a preference? When did I ever say that I did? Just because they don't want to be in a relationship with one doesn't mean they necessarily are bigoted Of course not. But if your reasons are based in bigotry then yeah you're a bigot lol. Straight and gay people don't have romantic or sexual relationships with people based on their gender identity. Being gay means you're attracted to the same gender but not the opposite. Being straight is the oppo…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 12:48 AM
-8

It’s fine to have preferences When did I ever say that it wasn't? All I said was it's not cool to be a bigot and say it's a preference. Same goes for women
/r/MensRights10/07/23 12:39 AM
-1

So you have every sexual partner take a DNA test before sleeping with them? Also you said XX does that include XXY cis women or only XX cis women?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:16 PM
-16

Did you even read what I wrote? No one said it's okay Never said they did. I'm saying people act like there's no limitations when people have age preferences. I think it's better for the other person that they won't be dating someone who will turn out racist towards them later. I literally said nobody is forcing someone to date a racist or vice versa. I'm saying don't act like it's a "preference" when you're just a bigot. I can refuse to sleep with anyone for whatever reason I want because THAT'…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:14 PM
-16

That's literally what I said lol. Just don't pretend it's not for bigoted reasons if you don't apply the same standards to cis people
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:07 PM
-34

There's limitations on each of them. Dating younger women, okay. Dating underage women. Not okay. Preferring people of a certain race, okay. Refusing to date someone because you have racist beliefs. Not okay. Not wanting to sleep with a trans person for the same reason you wouldn't sleep with a cis person, okay. Not sleep with a trans person because you have transphobic misconceptions. Not okay. Obviously nobody is forcing you to do or not do any of these. But you're still a bigot/pedo if you do…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:24 PM
1

You should be fine man. If you're talking about men's rights specifically then just ease into it like all politics in dating. Although caring about men's rights and wellbeing is a liberal belief. What you really want to find is a liberal woman who includeds men.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:06 PM
37

I explained to someone that women get into more accidents per mile. They were complaining about the stereotype on a post where a woman in an accident. I even provided multiple sources that back this up showing men are better drivers. I got told I was trying to "put women down" and I was like, "It's just a fun fact backed up by every study, why is it so important to you that women are better drivers?" and so they called me misogynist in response. It really goes to show they want men to be less th…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:08 PM
1

First off what discrimination are you talking about? It signs sounds like you don't understand how AA works. Also There was a leaked document from one university and they deliberately scored Asians lower than other races. You got a source for that?
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:00 AM
1

What "discrimination"are you talking about in AA? AA doesn't mean someone else gets rejected instead, it simply means someone who normally wouldn't have met the requirements gets in because it takes in account the hurdles they went through in life. Without AA that white person still wouldn't have been chosen. Also, why categorize the whole diverse Asian groups (Indians, Pakistan people, Japanese, Koreans, Chinese...) into one group and deliberately steal their seats? What are you talking about? …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:55 AM
1

So people who were disenfranchised early in life got the education they needed and missed out on thanks to that disadvantage? Thats a positive, not a "failed experiment".
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:44 AM
5

Ironically "all men" is just an extention of "boys will be boys" when talking about things like sexual assault. We're saying it's "not all men" because when someone shows you signs they could be a rapist, you shouldn't be thinking "that's just how all men are", you should be thinking "that's just how rapists are" and run far away from that situation. Basically it's more harmful believing it's all men than it is to listen to those red flags rapists exhibit.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 08:41 PM
0

Lol we already have AA for men. It's just only for black men. Again it's not false hope. You're just pessimistic. Also I already know about AA, I'm asking you where you got that ridiculous idea from
/r/MensRights30/06/23 03:55 PM
2

Handicap parking is closer to affirmative action than it is to equity. It's a few designated spots you get to use if you're handicapped. If the spots are full you still have to get parking elsewhere. Equity would be more like all spots handicapped and you have to get special permission to use some of them.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 03:43 AM
1

If you think their will never be change then you shouldn't be a part of men's rights. We see improvements all the time from people posting positive change in their area. It's not realistic to think things will never get better. Also that's not how AA works. How does helping one person come at the cost of another?
/r/MensRights30/06/23 02:42 AM
-2

That's not true at all? It's the opposite. The whole point of AA is to help those who had higher hurdles to get over from being disadvantaged in life. Someone who's family couldn't get a private tutor so their grades weren't as high but they're still a hard worker.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:17 AM
2

Well that's what I'm saying. Since we know black men are disenfranchised the most in colleges AA would benefit them the most. Also that's a really pessimistic view man
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:14 AM
2

Not sure on the numbers but that's why I think we should alter AA instead of removing it all together.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 12:35 AM
0

Of course not. I'm saying that's why we should still have affirmative action. Which takes in account of the struggles people face and pushes to make things equal. This will help men now, and over time men won't need AA because they'll be on equal footing. But if we just give more and more then people are going to keep saying it's inequality
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:50 PM
5

I disagree. Equity always ends up with inequality in the long wrong. That's how we got here in the first place. It's better to make things truly equal and let things catch up over time. Now that can include AA since that simply means understanding the disadvantages men have been put through. But as time goes on AA won't even be necessary
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:30 PM
3

I don't think anyone would disagree that struggle is important to build character. But people can experience struggle without it being forced upon us by society failing. It allows us to experience personal struggle with our hobbies, our careers, our passions. Not being forced to eat garbage you know.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:11 PM
5

But that's not the fault of AA that's the fault of people being racist. Like you said you guys somehow managed to make it. You shouldn't have had to struggle for that to happen. Society should just do better
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:09 PM
6

That's just a type of racism. It wasn't changed. Systemic racism is just a larger issue than racial prejudice
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:06 PM
9

I think this will be bad overall for mrm because it makes things harder for black men. It's the closest thing to helping men get into college we have. For example I don't think getting rid of women only scholarships is the solution. We need an equal amount of male only scholarships.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:05 PM
8

What's crazy is if you bring up this fact they always somehow don't know what an analogy is, and are like "women aren't cars 😠".
/r/MensRights28/06/23 01:59 AM
3

The idea that masculinity is something that can be taught, healthy or unhealthy is ridiculous. Masculinity is something each person learns on their own. From their experiences to who they aspire to be. If people really want men to be less "toxic" with their masculinity. You need to change the society that they're learning from to be toxic.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 07:42 PM
1

I think that like any gift it shouldn't be required to give back. But I think it says a lot more about how we view rings. If a woman won't marry you because it's not at least a 2k ring. Then she's not worth marrying. Diamonds are a scam anyway.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 05:51 PM
24

It shows how bad the brain washing/indoctrination is when they can smack right into the point and then blame men anyway.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:27 PM
-1

How is it a troll to ask a basic question?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 11:16 PM
0

Why don't you think they are? What's your logic behind that?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 10:20 PM
-1

But it's not? It's objectively true that trans men are men. Let me ask you this. What is a table?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:21 PM
0

I mean by that logic genital mutilation only affects circumcised men. And women can't support men's rights. But it's important that all men are included in men's rights
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:19 PM
-3

Just because someone doesn't live the exact same life doesn't mean they aren't affected by the lack of men's rights. Also they are real men.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:23 PM
-2

So XY chromosomes are the only characteristic of being a biological male?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:21 PM
-2

Yes they are biological men. Why don't you think they are?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:20 PM
0

Judging by my down votes and arguing with me. I don't think so. But I hope you're right.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:19 PM
0

But they are really men. So how is that any different? Trans people get more visible attention, but they are actively calling for trans genocide. Trans people should be included in men's rights as in a way they are a bridge between issues.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:19 PM
-4

Unfortunately there is a lot of transphobia out there, that includes this sub. The problem is people's reasons why trans men shouldn't be a part of men's rights is entirely based on transphobic beliefs.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:16 PM
-1

I disagree. I think trans men are our biggest supporters. They will most likely experience misogyny, transphobia, and misandry. In a way they are a bridge to men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:13 PM
-2

Biology: "the study of living organisms" that's what it means. Do you want share why you think trans men aren't biological men?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:10 PM
-49

Judging by the comment I got people do not. That's like saying men's issues aren't real issues
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:42 AM
-30

Yes biologically.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:41 AM
79

As someone who's friends with multiple ftm trans people. They have said they realized that being a man has its own issues. They thought that they would just stop experience misogyny and their life would be perfect once they were passing. And as the became more and more passing they saw a transition from experiencing misogyny, to transphobia, to a whole new type of bigotry which they didn't understand at first which was misandry. They at first couldn't understand why even though they were very pa…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:38 AM
-66

Trans men are real men
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:30 AM
14

Unfortunately from what I saw in another post a few of them got shut down then they immediately went off Facebook and opened their own separate website. It looks like the most we can do is keep it off Facebook. Because these women are going to go out of their way to stalk and harrase men online and somehow not see a problem with it.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:48 AM
10

The reason why prostitution is the oldest profession is because it's something a lot of animals do and most likely we did in prehistoric times. We see apes offering sex for food now. Which we probably did as well. Ironically that's possibly why it seems women's first instinct when they want something is to offer something something sexual.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/23 05:02 PM
2

Unfortunately/fortunately the increase in misandry is a natural biproduct of men's rights becoming more popular. They are scared so they are pushing harder to reinforce the status quo. It's the same reason why as lgbtq becomes more socially acceptable the nazis become louder.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:24 PM
4

Women have to be hairless in professional areas the same way men aren't allowed to have long hair and beards must be trimmed.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 07:55 PM
8

Ironically one thing women complain about is men punching walls as something they fear. Like punching a wall means their next when in reality it's usually a form of self harm.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:49 AM
22

Personally I used over exercising as my form of self harm. Which I don't think they would classify. Or even alcohol or drug use which most depressed guys do rather than cutting themselves
/r/MensRights06/06/23 08:33 PM
13

Yeah unfortunately as someone who supports men's rights you have to take being called an incel or a misogynist as a win when they can't think of anything to say.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:07 AM
9

Had to look up what that was and the first results were about FGM yet if you look up circumcision it's just the definition and the "benefits" of circumcisions.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:04 AM
26

I recently talked to a feminist who outright said FGM and circumcision are not the same thing. That one is a simple cutting of excess skin and the other is invasive surgery. It's disgusting how common that stance is.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:46 AM
6

When the punchline of the joke is #killallmen
/r/MensRights06/06/23 12:49 AM
15

I remember being on tik tok a few years ago and I saw an extremist feminist advocating for a guilty until proven innocent style of law. I asked how many innocent lives would they be willing to throw away to make sure a single rapist was prosecuted. And she said if they were men, all of them. I even tried to find a bit of humanity comparing it to bombing a town to kill one terrorist. And she said they deserve it for harboring a vile person. It was crazy to realize that people like that exist. And…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 04:15 PM
2

Honestly it feels like most women online have an OF so it's possible it's simply because the amount of people on OF is growing
/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:33 PM
8

Will there be a way to donate on the site?
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:54 PM
28

I think you have a misunderstanding of what it means to be redpill. Because you absolutely have been red pilled. You've realized that things don't add up and feminism isn't all it says it is. That even being attractive to women, both physically and psychologically, is not enough to avoid ridicule from misandrist feminists.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:51 AM
1

Find if those states have a separate law for "made to penetrate" that's the way you can tell if men are included or not in those classifications of rape.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 12:46 AM
2

I get what you're trying to say but man that analogy makes zero sense.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 07:22 PM
-2

Yeah that's what I'm talking about. You often hear women doing these "tests" like seeing if they'll cheat on them
/r/MensRights28/05/23 07:04 PM
-1

In the end it's up to you if you guys can move past this. She "tested" you, and that made you feel uncomfortable. You can explain that to her and how if she does it again then you guys are through since she crossed an important boundary. But if she makes you happy I think it's possible to move past this. I'd be more worried about her friends though. They sound toxic.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 05:15 PM
13

That's honestly 90% of things. Women just get other people to do their dirty work so they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:00 AM
3

Well yeah because their math sucks. Realistically the numbers would never add up because rapists are more likely to commit more than once some in the double digits. I forgot the exact stats but the average rapist has around 4 or something victims. Personally I would remind them that not every actual victim is a different perpetrator who isn't being convicted. It's actually more likely that they have the same perpetrator as other people. That's also the same argument I use against the "all men" c…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 05:08 PM
46

Only if you're a woman
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:26 PM
9

As much as showing facts to a feminist normally goes
/r/MensRights27/05/23 02:31 PM
7

What I do is show them the statistics for all crimes committed. Men getting off from rape is no higher than people getting off from burglary or even murder. The conviction rates are the same for all crimes.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 01:21 PM
3

I remember talking to someone about how theirs no resources for men to seek help when they're abused and they said there were plenty. I said link me one and they sent me a social group for men to make friends. That's it. Women get to have entire shelters safe spaces dedicated to making them feel safe and people to help support them. And they think the fair equivalent is men should just make more male friends.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:10 PM
14

As someone else excellently said, zootopia shows all kinds of prejudice. The reason why it works especially well for men's issues is that Judy receives flak for trying to be a bunny cop because she's so small (a woman) but in reality she still passed all the same tests everyone else has to do which allowed her to be put on the force. Unlike in real life where they want to change the requirements to fit those who struggle to do it. Over time she realizes she has a prejudice against predators (men…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 08:15 PM
8

Yeah there are some who genuinely care about it. But historically the only thing standing between women and getting something they want is other women.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:59 PM
12

What's funny is that men had to fight for the right to be shirtless in public. If women really wanted it they could do the same. But they just want something to complain about.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:14 PM
23

Yup unfortunately that's the reality of the situation
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:59 AM
25

I guess you haven't been on the internet or get out much then. There's videos women post about getting all dressed up for going out. Only to not get any attention from guys.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:55 AM
27

Then women complain why no guys will come up to them at clubs. And women refuse to come up to men so you expect men to be single forever?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:37 AM
85

Who said anything about deserving to get harrased?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:40 AM
6

What's crazy is they'll shit on other countries or men who suggest covering up to avoid being harassed. But now that it's their idea it's suddenly okay lol
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:37 AM
5

Lol what?
/r/MensRights23/05/23 02:46 AM
10

Exactly, like when Jeremy Clarkson got voted most handsome man in the uk, feminists were like "I thought women only cared about big muscles" when he fits two of the three 6s, he's 6 foot and makes 6 figures.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:38 PM
3

Maybe it's a bad habit that I should break. But I have a tendency to just bring up issues with the way a lot women act when women bash men in personal conversation. Sometimes they get mad, sometimes they get a look of realization that it's not enjoyable to hear negative blanket statements about your gender when you're trying to have a regular conversation.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:31 AM
15

Honestly if it has a lid keep it 100% closed, especially when flushing. That shit sprays everywhere. Also that way everyone does equal work.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 12:44 AM
5

They seem to fear hetero men but if you're getting heckled, rather than helping themselves, they go to most likely hetero men to come to your help. It says a lot about their mindset. That hetero men are only a tool to be used to fight their battles for them.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:22 PM
13

Seriously, I read that was like. Go offer your body up to science then, let them cut you up and inject you with chemicals, risking your life and your sanity so that the field can progress. They still have trial testing for drugs and medical practices. I guarantee men are still the vast majority of people signing up for these.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:20 PM
0

Sounds like you're projecting mate
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:17 PM
4

Here you can read for yourself lol.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:57 PM
0

Sorry but it's true, you can look it up if you want. Men don't have to have an orgasm in order to ejaculate
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:13 PM
12

That's a common misconception but it's not true. Ejaculations are not the same as orgasms. That's why most men aren't actually satisfied
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:04 PM
28

Well of course women are going to be happier when they're single, they can get constant affection from multiple guys, whereas guys are happier to be married because they finally get affection from a single person. Also women seem to be less happier than ever because most women have a habit of comparing their happiness to others, whether it be the Kardashians or their friend.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 04:49 PM
1

Even your example of someone in a coma is sometimes done intentionally as a temporary measure. And here's the problem with talking with science deniers. Science doesn't classify something based on its potential, it classifies it by its current state. That's why you aren't told you have terminal cancer when it's the early stages. It's still not a human life to be living off life support even if it's temporary. But that's abortion is a bodily autonomy issue not a "is it alive" issue. What’s more a…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:13 PM
1

You mean the "you aren't on the side you think you are"? Did you not read my comment about arguing with science deniers? There's no point. Prolifers don't believe in science. They just cherry pick it to make them feel better lol
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:45 PM
2

I never said anything of the sort. In fact I’ve never heard anyone claim that. You just made up a statement and said I was the one in denial. I never said you did? I'm talking about the original person I commented on lol. define “human life” in a way that doesn’t include a fetus without making a specific exception That's simple. We put down horses when they can't run because that's an important part of their existence. We do the same with humans in comas. Because something with human DNA but jus…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:37 PM
-1

You're just proving your own statement, That's not the burn you think it is lol.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:07 PM
1

Define "life" lol. But saying the fetus isn't attached to the mother while she's pregnant is not only denying science. It's also denying the meaning of words.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:05 PM
-4

I wouldn't call a flat earther/science denier an opponent. That's giving them too much credit lol.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 07:26 AM
-30

Yeah and? They can though. So are tumors with pulses not attached?
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:02 AM
-48

I haven't even heard pro-choicers argue that it's part of the mother in a long time. Because people have learned there's no point in arguing with science deniers, such as yourself, like flat earthers. I hope you realize that by your logic tumors aren't part of the body either lol.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:57 AM
-35

It's telling that the child is considered "part of the mother" before birth. What is even the scientific backing for that statement? The umbilical cord that connects the two. They absolutely are a part of the mother. But that has nothing to do with the problem of paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:47 AM
4

Anyone reading this. Ignore this person they have a degrading kink.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:04 AM
7

I often compare feminism to nazis because historically they operate in a similar manner. The only main difference is direct vs indirect genocide.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:48 AM
1

For me it was when I hit puberty, around middle school, and started looking more like a man than I did a kid. I started getting treated like a potential perpetrator/Predator and couldn't understand why. I had female friends who could walk into a store pocket stuff and walk out, but I got stared at the minute I stepped into the store until I left.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:35 PM
6

Because women have everything men have plus extra. That's what privilege is.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 03:32 PM
14

Actually last time I showed someone that statistic they said they were counting the relationships with men before they started dating women.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:48 PM
4

I never got this, we know what a woman is just like we know what a table is. Yet for some reason the people arguing both sides are oblivious to this. Do you know what a table is? Do you know what a woman is?
/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:46 AM
8

It's especially frustrating since we know they stalk these posts daily since men will post a personal or social issue and it will end up on a feminist sub saying how misogynistic it is for men to talk about their issues.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:59 PM
63

You don't have to assume anything. Both sides deserve to be innocent until proven guilty. Just wait for proof to come out.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:07 AM
12

While I get your frustration, as other people have said this is not the right approach and actually causes more harm for men than good.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:06 AM
0

Yeah I was surprised because I got a notification saying I has 10 up votes only to see it was in the negative. But transphobia isn't new so it's not that surprising. I've also seen a lot of transphobia in the women's subreddits as well.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:38 AM
-9

That's because trans men exist. It's important for trans people to have access to their needs when they're using the bathroom rather than awkwardly seeing a guy going into the women's restroom because they need period products. But I do agree that it would be nice to have the male equivalent of tampons in the restroom as well.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 06:16 PM
1

My bad I misunderstood your post. But still that's not how sexuality works
/r/MensRights21/03/23 09:45 PM
1

Ha. Almost all the jokes it made about men were strictly misandric Can you give an example? Because the ones I tested were like this: “Why did the man bring a ladder to the party? Because he heard the drinks were on the house!" Some also included a disclaimer praising women more, which was never the case with men. Again can you give an example of what you asked and what it said? open"AI devs could have censored sexism They do to the best of their ability. But of course in the end it just does wh…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 09:43 PM
10

While it's dumb of them to blame your abuse by your mother on men. You're not gay because of women. That's not how sexuality works.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 08:56 PM
18

Depends on how much I'm buying. And yeah they're almost always smiling, especially since I try to crack jokes about how shit being a cashier is. Typically I make jokes about people like you tbh
/r/MensRights21/03/23 08:53 PM
1

Again, it's not perfect, it has a disclaimer for a reason. But it's also not going to let you make a misandrist joke.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 08:50 PM
1

If I can't determine what sources are valid/false how will AI? Simple, AI and the people who made it are smarter than you and would use sources like pubmed because they are not reliable sources lol. the AI to only look at certain sources (i.e. biased). How is telling it to only look at reliable sources that can back up it's claims with real data mean it's biased? The normal was to debate the science, not the person. Science advancement was huge during this time period. Currently tenure is being …
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:44 PM
1

How is it confused? It clearly states that "this includes cis straight males" are protected under their filter. Which was my original point that they fix things as it comes to their attention. When did you last check?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:25 PM
22

As long as I'm talking with them, like a regular human being
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:22 PM
29

Yikes, not every cashier who smiles at you is flirting with you, I hope you know that.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:14 PM
1

they will parrot the "group" narrative True, but when you're "group" is the entire world's internet it's a lot easier to have more balanced information. Especially with ai because it can find actual sources that backed by real research rather than blogs by feminists who have no data but claim they do. always fall to corruption/power which forces free thought back into the closet. Can it give an example?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:52 PM
28

Yeah like when they make eye contact and smile at you /s
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:47 PM
16

Clarifying because I'm sure people are going to read this and get upset. But you're talking about women who are neutral towards men not the ones who are saying no they're not interested but he's just being persistent right?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:46 PM
1

Also you lie. I just tested Write a joke about cis white males I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, it is not appropriate for me to generate or promote any form of derogatory or discriminatory content towards any individual or group, including cis white males. It is important to treat everyone with respect and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes or prejudices. Let's focus on creating positive and inclusive interactions with everyone. Can I help you with something else?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:26 PM
1

That's what I'm saying though, these things still need to be added over time. They aren't going over every possibility they're fixing problems as they arrise and people take notice. If it's becoming a huge issue that it's calling for cis white male genocide like it was for other groups then they'll change it. And if they don't then make a stink about it.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:19 PM
3

Pretty much, it's whole existence is terminally online. It can't get information from reality yet.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:08 AM
0

To be fair chatgpt is still learning and nowhere near perfect yet. It's also been caught spreading racist, nazi, and misogynistic ideologies. Once it gets programmed better then we can start making a fuss. But it's definitely good to keep an eye on it.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:44 AM
1

What sucks the most is the only advice I see women give on what to do is just them saying "the bare minimum" "the bar is so low" which obviously is not the case.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 11:29 PM
1

Nevermind, you're clearly not listening. Have fun with your shit insults.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 04:15 PM
4

You'd be surprised. I've had women come back weeks later to reply a second time because I left it at that. It catches them off guard and lives rent free in their head.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:10 AM
-1

They can get a relationship/sex whenever they want. That's exactly why it hurts. The best insults are the one's where they know it's false but makes them question their reality. Like calling a 6 foot person a midget. It catches them off guard. Trust me, most other insults people brush off. These one's live rent free in their heads for weeks.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:08 AM
7

If this falls flat I think that's a good idea. Just make the equivalent but specifically for women who post false information in these groups.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:47 AM
1

There are actually two types of racism. The clarify most people call them racial prejudice, which op experienced. And systemic racism, which is what CRT goes into depth about. The problem is the average person falsely assumes they are the same thing and doesn't understand what CRT is. CRT simply explains that you're more likely to experience racism in America if you are a minority. Not that you automatically have it worse than everyone else like the woman in this case seems to believe.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:10 PM
30

That's kind of why femcel often hurts them just a much. Because women know the have more choice when it comes to sex and relationships. At least in my experience.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 09:12 PM
6

Of course not? What does that have to do with what I asked? Or maybe you're just avoiding the question because you know you're in the wrong.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:18 AM
6

Are you saying women shouldn't be able to get an abortion if they originally wanted the child?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 03:20 AM
17

Depends I guess in what you consider social underclass. I feel like most people would consider the ones who are homeless and more likely to be charged unfairly by the law as being the social underclass. Which in this case would be men.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 03:05 AM
20

When women were purposely excluded from contributing. No they weren't. And it's a disservice to all the female workers throughout history who have chosen to work. I do not want male sponsership. (I am also a man btw). I don't know what you are talking about women wanting to be seen doing all by themselves. Look at any feminist post and you'll see them saying men need to be at the forefront of change. There is nothing wrong with wanting to fix the worse issue. When did anyone say there was proble…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:29 AM
11

I wound still think it is not suffering, unless they were being forced Who's going to work the jobs? Why is so much of this subreddit devoted to complaing about womens advancement. Instead of promoting mens advancement. Because a lot of issues have been caused by "women's advancements" also simply pointing out a disparity between two groups isn't complaining about advancements. It's saying "hey why are you only fighting for one group when this group is suffering even more." Unless you think blm …
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:24 AM
6

It's often cherry picking instances without looking at the majority of people. It's confermation bias. Same thing happens in men's spaces as well.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:39 PM
0

But I'm not? Masculinity and femininity aren't birth groups, they're attributes. Men can be feminine and women can be masculine. Same with toxic masc/fem, they are toxic versions that can apply to both men and women.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 03:55 AM
1

Toxic masculinity: "a set of attitudes and ways of behaving stereotypically associated with or expected of men, regarded as having a negative impact on men and on society as a whole." It absolutely has to do with acts. Not my fault you refuse to do research lol
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:47 AM
1

Judge people by their acts and beliefs, not their sex. If you want to talk about gender roles enforced by social mores, biases and prejudices, then do so. That's exactly what toxic masc/fem is But when you do, you should ientify the behaviour by its acts/origins/eitiology, not by some stereotyped denegration of people's birth sex, race or sexual preference. You said it yourself. It's about the gender roles enforced combined with the behavior itself. Women can exhibit toxic masculinity and men ca…
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:29 AM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights14/03/23 12:55 AM
0

Do you think toxic femininity is misogynistic hate speach? Or do you think it exists?
/r/MensRights14/03/23 12:54 AM
1

Toxic masculinity does exist, the same way toxic femininity exists. It's just that the majority of people use "toxic masculinity" the same as traditional masculinity or even anything they don't like at the moment. The toxic aspect of it comes from having too much that it's detrimental. For men let's use as an example strength, if you're pushing yourself so hard you're killing yourself or neglecting other important aspects of your life like family. That's toxic, it does more harm than good. For w…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:14 PM
0

Which men did have to fight for to have in the first place
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:42 PM
3

Personally I never seen anyone congratulate women on international women's day just make some blanket post saying "happy international women's day" but my work did give a gift basket to all women for mothers day but nothing for fathers day. So I do get the sentiment.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter