TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaBuddahN Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by DaBuddahN on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Yes, and the gender disparity between sentencing laws is SIX TIMES LARGER than the racial disparity - yet I've heard many people actually say that that doesn't prove institutional discrimination against men based on their gender. It's crazy to be honest.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:58 PM
2

NOW. I wouldn't be surprised if it were a Super PAC that included NOW and other prominent feminist advocacy groups. NOW actively opposes default child custody and alimony/child support reform. I wouldn't be surprised if they opposed men's shelters as well.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:55 PM
2

Well, it's not like you can draw any real conclusions with a data set of like ... 3 samples. Visit more often, make up your own mind.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:49 PM
2

There are LEGAL imbalances between men and women that NEED to be addressed. I believe these issues, particularly family court, would've be addressed years ago if it weren't for NOW's staunch opposition to default joint custody and child support/alimony reform. They literally threaten any Democrat with retaliation if they support these bills. So yeah, while I want to address societal gender roles and believe it's a legitimate issue - LEGAL discrepancies take precedent because it's literally the s…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:45 PM
2

You're welcome :)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:28 PM
2

You know you can subscribe to multiple services right?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:04 PM
15

I can't believe this sexist comment got upvoted so much. Gotta love the brigading. This is literal tumblr bullshit right here. Your comment is like saying people shouldn't be feminists because idiots like Valerie Solanas existed. Get real.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:59 PM
6

Well I know some of the statistics he mentioned are true. Men make up many DV victims - it's just that they end up staying at a hotel instead of a shelter because there are no shelters. A lot DV is mutual in nature. Both participants are violent and both perpetuate violence long after they move on to other relationships. If you want insight into DV, read up on Erin Pizzey, she founded the first DV shelters in the UK and she's an MRA in some sense. She understands that women can be just as violen…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:56 PM
1

If you're accusing idiots on the left of denying science and then do so yourself, then you're no better than them. This isn't nonsense - its science. I also didn't know that brain imaging was soft science fuckery.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:25 AM
2

Sure, most shows have a political bent - but this hardly seems like dogma. I'd say most of the science is solidly in his camp even though he might be a bit alarmist and dramatic.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:36 PM
1

I'm going to watch the episode myself. But I have a feeling you are greatly exaggerating what is being said. That segment is a jab at gay conversion therapy, not heterosexuality. The vanilla ice cream at the end giving in to 'experiment' with other flavors is a reference to those anti-gay priests/therapists who end up being caught with male hookers.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:23 PM
0

Yes, it has. The terms gender and sex at distinguishable now. They weren't before. No one in science is saying that if you are biologically male, that you can change that biological reality. But they do understand that there are cases where an individual does not identify with their biological gender. They understand that there are people who, from a taste, personality and desire perspective have more in common with the opposite gender than with their own gender. We are beginning to understand t…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:20 PM
1

Yeah, it's a solid jab at gay conversion therapy. There are still people who believe in that crap, which has no basis in science. Do you not understand he is making fun at people who believe that garbage? I mean, the segment is weird. The cartoon is kind of silly, but the point is easily understandable.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:15 PM
6

First of all, that wasn't particularly offensive. Secondly, he made fun of Asians too. Calm down.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:05 PM
0

This post is more alarmist than anything I've seen Bill Nye say or do. And if repeating Donald Trump's words on TV is 'leftist dogma', then that's a pretty low bar. Bill Nye is simply saying that the understanding of what sex and gender are has changed and is likely to continue to change and as a scientist he has changed his positions accordingly based on new evidence. That is all. That is what science is about.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:03 PM
1

I mean, if the fact that the scientific community is beginning to officially distinguish between 'gender and sex', then I don't understand the controversy. I'd like to see all human sexuality and biology degrees all these people who're mad at Bill Nye possess. They just seem angry that Bill Nye has updated his position - which is what scientists do. So no, it's not understandable - it's just ignorant. They liked him because he said something 20 years ago that they agreed with, and now feel betra…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:56 PM
2

I haven't seen Bill Nyes show - but how is it propaganda? I was under the impression it was an entertaining science show. Unless you're saying that Global Warming is propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:23 PM
1

I don't believe the issue of police militarization is marxist propaganda, no. Police in this country, for the most part, are selected from the lowest rung of capable individuals. It is no surprise that their performance and attitude generally reflects that. Not to mention the high level of tribalism and corruption within police departments. It's always been my experience that people who thrive in 'old boys club' settings are generally not the most competent individuals - and police departments a…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:09 AM
1

Why are you being so condescending? The points he made are real - how can you expect the modern feminist structures to be an ally of men's rights when they explicitly lobby against things like default joint custody, alimony reform, and so on? In many cases calling fathers rights group an 'abusers lobby'?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:51 PM
27

It should be the individuals choice.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:53 PM
2

Most on this sub don't consider themselves against women's rights. What most people on this sub do, however, consider to be true, is that modern feminism at some point decided to use men as cop-outs in order to advance their agenda/goals; that they and their 'male culture' were the root cause of all their problems. If none of that were true, and Feminism were truly the unifying equality movement that they purport to be - this sub wouldn't even exist. But the lobbying elements within Feminism hav…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:37 PM
6

The 3.99 is for renting friend. Not purchasing.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:44 PM
12

Am I missing something here? Is it wrong to use legal resources in order to get things accomplished in a timely and legal matter? How is the guy to blame for any of this?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:00 AM
5

While I agree that Ginsburg's comments are ridiculous ... I have to ask; is the comment section on Breitbart always that dumb?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:48 PM
7

Jesus Christ - how did you, how didn't anyone, notice the sarcasm there? @_@
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:27 AM
1

Wow. Such bias. There is nothing to conclusively prove at all that we live in a patriarchy, or that patriarchy is even a thing.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:18 AM
19

That's why a lot of men don't like the idea of therapy. It seems that in therapy (something psychological professionals are supposed to be involved in) the sessions are all about reminding the man what his responsibilities are. For women, therapy is all about ego repair - whether or not she is at fault or not. Not all therapists are like this, but I assume enough are.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:56 PM
2

People downvote the term 'patriarchy' because it is meant to insinuate male dominance and reign, even though they claim it's not supposed to. They choose to use a gendered term for something that is not particularly a gendered issue. Just like everything else in Feminism.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:58 PM
1

All he needs is one or two good books.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:46 AM
1

Well I always wanted a brother!
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:31 AM
41

I have been across almost all of the major gender subs in Reddit ... As a member of most of the manosphere subreddits, including AskMen, TRP, MensRights, Seduction, etc, this is my view of TRP. People will rush to judgment and say that TRP has a lot of hateful and misogynistic language, and they would not be wrong, this is true. What people fail to understand (because they don't stick around long enough) is that that is not what the sub is about. The sub is about being successful in life, especi…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:04 PM
3

Nah. If anything he proved that was some more polishing, he deserves to be in the world arena. That 8th round KO was bad, but it's not like Froch was dominating - it was a good fight up until that point. Plus, everyone who is fair will remember that at the very least, that first fight didn't play out how it was supposed to. Whether you believe Groves would have been able to stick it out or not, that fight did not end in a convincing way. As long as he doesn't lose to subpar fighters, he still ha…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 06:47 PM
0

It was a load of bullshit. I feel like Groves' moment of glory was kinda stolen from him. He came out with a good strat that basically won him 7 straight rounds when he first fought Froch. I feel like the ref was just looking for a moment of Froch dominance so he could stop the fight and prevent the match from going to the cards. Why do I say this? Because Groves put Froch is situations that were just as bad as that controversial 9th round. Groves delivered like 6 or 7 staight rights to Froch's …
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 06:22 PM
12

Everybody always 'knows'; especially after it happens. Then you really REALLY know.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 03:32 PM
9

Why don't you have access to Imgur? It's basically just a bunch of pictures with bullshit statistics and strawman arguments like: 1/6 women are raped. Frogman's M&M analogy. Screaming 'Fire' instead of 'Rape' will result in faster help. Women complaining they have to buy pepper spray while men buy condoms (wtf, I buy knives). Appeal to emotion rather sound arguments, etc.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:51 PM
9

Every single one of those posts is full with bullshit and misinformation.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:44 PM
5

Nice.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:30 AM
11

I just think the whole "Men cannot think when they see the female figure comment" was a little out there.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:04 AM
12

Holy shit, that AMA was hit hard.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:30 PM
1

You're right, I shouldn't have. But that is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about logical arguments. I'm not saying that humans, or women, follow some mathematical formula; I'm just saying that members of this sub make statements that are at times contradictory with one another, and they don't seem to pick up on their own hamstering. There is enough hamstering going on in the world, I'd like to come to a place where there is none of it. We're supposed to use the hamster to our advantage …
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 09:40 PM
2

I agree wholeheartedly that these women deserve hard nexts and nothing more.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 10:39 AM
3

My solution is just to never be afraid of walking away. It's being able to be in what is seemingly a great relationship, but not being afraid to walk away if things go sour. I think a lot of people shy away from real LTRs because if this go sour, it stings and it takes a little while to get yourself together again. I guess I simply don't shy away from the potential heartache and whatnot because I don't want to spend my entire life substituting self-imposed consequences for potential consequences…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 02:13 AM
3

Bro, I know what you're saying. I agree with you in that fact that the girl you're trying to hook up with has to be into in an obvious way; when women are into you, they generally have a hard time hiding it, it's just how they are - all giddy like. But what I'm saying is that there's a sentiment in this sub in which a girl who isn't fucking you is wasting your time ALWAYS. That traditional, feminine, family oriented girl might not fuck you on the first couple of dates because she's trying to bui…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 01:53 AM
1

I agree with you. The AWALT philosophy is a useful tool to show guys that woman are just human beings and can be as malicious and hateful as any man, even more so in a subliminal and deceitful way. It's great if you don't want to get into a LTR, although it kinda sucks because if that is the core of your philosophy, you will always be looking down on the women in your life, even if she's great - because the core behind AWALT is distrust. And while I do believe a great big healthy amount of distr…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 01:48 AM
2

I'm not saying there isn't truth behind RP wisdom; there's a lot. You're stuck on the whole 3 dates statement, which is just a random number I threw in there and is far from the point. The point is that you can't expect a high value girl to suck your dick shortly after meeting her, and then dismiss girls who suck your dick on the first date. Obviously not everyone on TRP repeats this statement, but it is a sentiment expressed here enough that I felt the need to comment on it. I have met maybe ..…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 01:43 AM
6

This is true. I get what you're saying. To me the thing I wanted to take away from TRP, and what I want other LTR-minded men to take away is ... Never be afraid of walking away. That is the single most important thing I learned from TRP about relationships (aside from lifting, etc, etc). More men need to value themselves, take care of themselves and learn to walk away when the LTR just isn't worth it anymore.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 10:04 PM
5

I see what you're saying, and I agree that not everyone is out looking for LTRs. I'm not looking for one right now either; but that is far from the point I'm trying to make. There is demand on this sub for LTR content (people ask for it all the time in the comments), the reason why those other subs are empty is because everyone else is here, in this sub, and people enjoy the sense of community. I'm not going to go to a sub with 5 people, when I can be in a quality sub with 40k subscribers. But t…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 09:26 PM
101

The problem I currently see with TRP, although it has taught me so much, is that a lot of the guys here don't seem to want LTR's, which is great; they don't wanna put in any effort to fuck a girl who doesn't put out on the first date. The problem with that goes something like this: Some RP member - "If a girl doesn't wanna fuck after 3 dates, I next her! Simple as that." followed by ... Same RP Member - "If I can fuck a girl on the first date, she's clearly no LTR material, so she'll always only…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 08:43 PM
2

I have not read that book; thanks for putting it on my radar again.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 08:19 PM
2

That sucks man. You gotta remember that although women are kinda crazy; having real bros/friends to relate with relieves a great deal of pressure. You can also learn from their experiences. They will always look out for you. TRP made me appreciate male friendships so much more than I used to.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 07:30 PM
3

I know, I'm 24 and although I don't live in the immediate area of any of my old buddies, we still remain in contact and pretty much know we can rely on one another to vent. I feel like people let go of their old friendships too easily.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 07:23 PM
5

I dunno dude; my bros and I always discuss things if one of is feeling somewhat down or insecure about something. No judgment. I like this because as men, once the problem is discussed, we begin to find solutions instead of just saying pretty words to make each other feel better. One thing I never understood about TRP is why everyone here seems to not have a few bros that are willing to see them at their weakest and still be there for them; I've had that my entire life with my handful of best fr…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 06:31 PM
5

I agree that there is a huge backlash against generalizations when it comes to human, especially female behavior - it's part of this new-agey bullshit that has gone too far when it comes to appreciating the uniqueness of the human condition. I fully agree with your last paragraph; truer words have never been spoken. I just come from a very scientific background, so when I see the absolutist language used in this sub when it comes to scientific research in an area where there are no absolutes; it…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 11:08 PM
1

I respect the fact that this sub backs its hypotheses and arguments with scientific facts; but I fucking hate how everything that isn't in RP language is automatically "BP". Saying "most women tend to" is the most scientifically and factually accurate thing anyone of any background could say with respect to the things discussed here. Everyone 'endorsed' member here links to studies to prove their point, which is a premise I believe everyone who has an argument with regards to anything should do;…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 05:58 PM
1

Nice! The science I am referring to is mainstream Biology really. There's the documentary called "Brainwashed!" (it's in Norwegian with English subs) in which a comedian sets out to challenge mainstream feminism and bullshit gender pseudo-science. In one chapter, he meets with several researchers from different backgrounds, and each of them explains to him that although society does at some level influence of sexual behavior, our biology is the main characteristic that determines our sexual pred…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 01:05 AM
1

I probably will buy the book, it seems like an interesting read. What I'm saying is that if the underlying premise of the book is what I suspect it is, which is that our modern culture/society somehow induced hypergamy in our women, this it's just simply not true. Science will tell you that our biology dictates all those characteristics more than our culture/societal influences do. So weening women off of that hypergamy is simply not possible unless evolutionarily speaking, it tappers off by its…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:47 AM
2

Dafuq. Some argument you have there. I didn't say this was feminism; simply that it's using the same logic feminism uses to explain human sexual behavior, in this case "we are molded by society, culture, etc more than our biology", which according to most science is simply not true.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:18 AM
3

I'm not sure I agree with this idea. Most science seems to agree that our sexual behavior is closely related to our biology and life experiences. The whole idea that our sexual identity is "cultural and social conditioning" is the exact same argument feminists make right now; except that this book has a Red Pill twist to it. In the end, if I am understanding what he's saying correctly, he's just as wrong as mainstream feminism for the exact same reasons. Biology > Social influence... for now.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 08:31 PM
-2

Please, walking up to someone and making a statement like that is a huge bait. A professor who's dealt with this topic a lot has likely run into many people trying to use this data as evidence that black people are more likely to be criminals, and have a lower IQ naturally. It's quite understandable that he quickly associates someone bringing up this data with some negative connotation. No one is academia denies these statistics, they are readily accepted. This is just an example of someone tryi…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 03:38 AM
0

Long time lurker here on TRP ... I subbed just to upvote this comment and save it forever.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 06:43 AM
3

It's about Juvenile Delinquents. You can be a father of a JD without being a delinquent yourself. It tends to happen in places stricken with poverty.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:02 PM
4

The comment I'm replying to makes no mention of delinquent dads. That's a term you're injecting into this, which could an entirely different discussion on its own.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 07:37 PM
30

I would agree with this if the current system and laws in place weren't so criminally biased against men. It's like cutting off a persons' hands and asking him why he isn't a better boxer. In the current system, many men can't be strong father figures to their children because they simply aren't allowed. The mother of their children has the ultimate say in how much presence a father can have in a child's life; and in the current hyper feminist culture, most of these women think they can be mothe…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:17 PM
3

A numbers game? A numbers game implies that they are actually good at numbers. Most of their statistics are wrong/made up and disingenuous.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:09 PM
42

The most messed up point I read was this: "This was a problem for us. We wanted to figure out why women would be attracted to a man that they think is not going to be good to them in a relationship," said Jillian O’Connor, the lead author of the study. Man, people from all over Reddit give the guys over at TRP a lot shit. But people need to understand, that setting aside all the bitterness, anger and resentment over there, they have a really solid point, and I'm not sure how much longer modern m…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:11 PM
3

Where can I find some legitimate stats on child abduction? I'd like to see the male to female ratio of abductors.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter