TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaScoobyShuffle Archive

View 0 posts and 236 comments by DaScoobyShuffle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This thread leaves a lot to be desired. Like wtf are these responses? Hey btw, many people come to subs like these because they had horrible experiences. Just keep in mind that everyone here thought just like you and got burned. The ones who thought like you, but didn't get burned, aren't here. Enjoy your relationship, but I suggest you lower your optimism a bit.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:26 PM
6

Well you could ask but let's be honest, you don't ask do you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 08:21 PM
-11

r/menandfemales
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:02 PM
2

Women enroll at a higher rate than men. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/analysis/2021/11/19/women-complete-college-more-than-men/ Women get 10 of 11 gender specific scholarships https://misandrytoday.com/10-out-of-11-scholarships-are-reserved-for-women/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 02:48 PM
1

Yes, but the men would still hold up the infrastructure long enough for those jobs to be filled. Women would not be able to hold up the power grid, not because they're incapable, but because we simply do not have enough women in the field.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:35 PM
3

Women are favored in both
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 02:27 PM
12

This does not in any way line up with statistics. Statistically, a man that can support a family on his own income makes over 80k which is 15% of men. So many women cannot live off a man period. In addition to that, the women getting with these top 15% in terms of marriage do have to achieve something. They are either also career driven or they have to be a housewife, one good enough for a man to want to stay commit to, which in itself is an accomplishment. It may not be the same as being an acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 06:13 AM
1

It just seems you as do others have a personal issue with this specific issue being discussed I already acknowledged that this issue is a valid issue and it needs to be discussed. My problem is the way it is being framed. Yes, women's health products cost more than they should. But it is not an issue of misogyny or sexism like it is being framed to be. I never said people should not talk about the issue. People are free to talk about whatever they want Of course! I'm just pointing out the conseq…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 05:52 AM
1

It does distract. How? The pink tax complaints make everyone gloss over the actual issue. Necessary items for basic human function are being monetized for a profit. And instead of focusing on that, the feminists are just going on about sexism and how bad women have it. It's unproductive at best but the thing is, feminist blogs and podcasts make money off this shit. People need to understand that most of modern day feminism is a business. It is designed to take problems and spin them into problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:33 AM
0

There is no harm in pointing it out, but it distracts from more important issues, while in itself it is an unfixable issue (in America). Those prices are not gonna go down because feminists are complaining about it in blogs. And I understand that they are critical for hygiene. I'm not saying they aren't. But again, supply and demand. Tampons and such will have prices that are a bit higher than normal hygiene products because there is extra demand. A great example is glasses. Just like is is not …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:05 AM
2

So you mean to tell me that every product has to follow the same rate of inflation? When has that ever been the case? Does gas have the same rate of inflation as cereal? Does oil have the same rate of inflation as clean water? Everything generally has its own rate of inflation (I mean cmon look at the price of glasses) and yet the only one that gets complained about is the pink tax. I mean damn, condoms went up too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:49 AM
2

No no no. You cannot say the "pink tax" is unfair when there is no baseline to use for comparison with men. I was talking about female care products that have male counterparts, such as shampoo, skin care products, etc. Do you expect these things to be given to women for free? And since they're not, you're claiming some sort of problem? Why doesn't the same apply to food? Or toilet paper? Well, I think we both know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:33 AM
8

I'm aware of the pink tax and I do not deny it. The person above mentioned taxes on feminine products. There are no legally mandated taxes on feminine products beyond standard sales taxes. For the most part, the pink tax is due to supply and demand. Throughout all of history, women have consumed more than men. It may not be fair, but it only makes sense that businesses will capitalize on this fact. Male care products are often just as expensive but there is far less demand. Look at quality men's…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:25 AM
1

Affirmative action is when a group is given additional resources in comparison to the standard in a certain field or practice in recruiting. Women get well over 85% of gender specific scholarships. Therefore it is impossible for you to say men have more resources in comparison to the standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:21 AM
1

That's in no way true. Do we have millions of dollars on grants and scholarships given to men only?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:51 PM
8

That's sales tax which applies to almost any product
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:45 PM
2

Absolutely. Not me though.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:10 AM
0

Well you may be able to, but for me there may be some consequences
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:59 AM
0

It's more about them being religious amd voting how the pastors tell them to. In their minds, they are saving babies. They don't even consider the whole women's rights side of it until they get preggo.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:50 AM
6

With that logic, we can blame women for abortion bans since, in red states, most female voters vote R.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:48 AM
13

The ones who made the draft clauses have been dead for well over 100 years. Even then, it was rich men who wouldn't be drafted in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:01 AM
1

Fertilization
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:29 PM
1

I'm not a feminist lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:17 PM
2

Abortion is a medical procedure.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:03 PM
2

Their goal is to "win" not to actually make things better
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:23 PM
8

What if the man is raped? Under precedent, he still has to pay. I think both situations are unjust.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:15 PM
10

This is the dumbest take on the pro-choice side. Women are the majority of R voters. So if it were only up to women, the results would be the same. Also, it's a slap in the face to all of the male supporters of abortion rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:12 PM
5

It say 19% are in favor of a permanent ban
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:10 PM
2

Unsure how that is relevant. Abortion is not comparable to men wanting to release responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:09 PM
5

This is delusional at best
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:19 PM
2

And who is trying to lower their funding?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:18 PM
1

The pharmaceutical industry is the one that makes the treatments. Obviously they'd support a president that would fund their research. Dems have been trying to lower prices though, and efforts have been blocked by republicans. But that's not important, what's important is where the money from the insurance companies goes. Most goes to Reps, but a fair amount goes to conservative Dems.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 03:38 PM
1

Depends on how many republicans are in office
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 03:16 PM
2

I mean it's simple really. Insurance companies make more money this way, and businesses can get away with more since their employees will have a harder time leaving. Since corporations run politics, we'll likely never see socialized health insurance.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 02:56 PM
4

Taxes would not necessarily have to go up. The US already pays more for healthcare than other countries. If we had public healthcare, we wouldn't have to keep sending money to insurance companies to ensure we have a strong system. Taxes could actually go down.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 02:32 PM
1

Of course they're lying. There's already a billion dollar industry around female bc. They're can't just take all that back. If male bc was out, it'd be the same. But at the same time, male bc has always had worse side effects, short and long term. The few that didn't had to get scrapped for other reasons, for example one was super effective with like no side effects but if you had a sip of alcohol then you'd be hospitalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:37 PM
2

Yeah, these days it's much harder to get things through. Female bc wouldn't get through these days either if it were a new thing. But even these days, male bc still causes those mood disorders at a rate of over 2% which is actually too high to pass trials. The 2016 trials were stopped for that reason. Hopefully the current ones have a fix.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 06:49 PM
3

IIRC birth control attempts to trick the body into thinking it's pregnant. After a while the body's estrogen ratio gets to a level that decreases sex drive. After stopping it, the estrogen ratio drops, which would mean that the testosterone ratio gets higher, giving the woman a higher sex drive. Very rough explanation but those are the basics IIRC.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 06:41 PM
2

The ones in the 50s. Sorry I saw a full breakdown on this from this article but I don't remember the name of the study. The men in those trials were left infertile, and a few had severe depression, enough to force them to suicide. Messing with testosterone has some wild effects. When you hear that they were stopped because of mood disorders, they mean extreme disorders not just some mood swings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 06:38 PM
2

You mean when they start taking it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 06:35 PM
3

I agree. Neither would pass health protocols today. It lowers sex drive anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:36 AM
8

But they didn't put it on the market because the men who tested it had mild (very mild) secundary effects Yeah mild effects like heart complications, permanent hormone imbalance, permanent infertility, drastically decreased testosterone, and sometimes death. Women do not have it worse. Male BC couldn't even pass in the 50s with barely any regulations on the industry. The female bc wouldn't pass under these days. Female biology already provides a template for temporarily stopping ovulation. It al…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 06:59 PM
1

Well maybe brazil is different then. Idk man to me personally I just think it depends on who you interact with. I can can pick one set of 50+ people that are hypergamous, unstable, etc but at the same time when we're talking about gender, we're literally talking about billions of individuals. 50+ people wouldn't be enough for me to generalize billions of people. I'd need statistics. Stats show that most people attempt to end up in LTRs rather than quick sex. But men can't get quick sex, you say?…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:07 AM
1

Most men do not call it that. Maybe it's most of the men you're around. The vast majority of people want LTRs, and most men don't go sleeping around with 7+ partners when they're young.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:28 AM
2

Most men want a loving relationship that includes sex. Same with women. Most people who consistently get casual sex eventually get tired of it anyway and turn to monogamy. Stop projecting your views onto the rest of men, the whole "men only want sex" thing only makes it harder for women to look at men in a different light.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:06 AM
4

Ok then if you are not looking for stability don't only seek instability and then portray all women as unstable and complain about it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 03:08 AM
1

I find that even if people won't change their minds, it's still worth it to point these things out. Like, so they faced some resistance after saying shit like this. Honestly by just the title I can tell OP has some serious issues with his outlook on dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:56 AM
3

That's very unfortunate. Get out of the vortex dude. All those parties, raves, etc are for people who want the short term gratification. If your entire romantic life revolves around that, you'll get an extremely skewed perception of life. Find people who have real goals and are working towards them. Find people who can enjoy themselves without substance and sex. Among those people, there are plenty of great, STABLE women available, but they are also looking for a stable man. In general, your per…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:43 AM
8

What... the... fuck...? This is the most delusional thing I've seen on reddit BY FAR and believe me I'm not new. Make a beeline for some grass or something dude. Women are PEOPLE not NPCs in some sex RPG.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:13 AM
1

I wasn't talking about America's laws specifically, I was just talking about how gun laws should be generally. But btw by high capacity I mean something that has like 30+ bullets per reload.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:12 PM
2

Ok but cars are not specifically designed for the purpose of killing people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 04:45 PM
1

By high capacity assault weapons, I meant pretty much amything that can fire lots of bullets into a crowd. Fully automatic rifles, LMGs, semi automatic marksman rifles, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 04:41 PM
3

It more about how easy it is to kill lots of people with a gun. With a knife you have to get close to them, close enough for them to defend themselves. With a gun you can just shoot some bullets from a distance. I saw something on a conservative sub about some weapons being a force equalizer, amd others being force multipliers. I think everyone would agree that the weapons in the second category (high capacity assault weapons, explosives, 50-cal sniper rifles, etc) shouldn't be in the hands of c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 02:09 PM
2

Now thats much more likely lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 02:04 AM
1

AI will never become self aware enough to edit its own coding without bugs. People seem to think AI can actually learn like a human can. It can't, it is just programmed to record patterns and function accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:48 AM
1

Yeah, but it's at the discretion of someone whose job is to make sure the payment is as high as possible, so that the state can keep collecting taxes from the payments. It's not like they simply recalculate, they consider a lot of things. If she says anything about abuse, true or not, good luck getting the amount lowered unless you lost some limbs. Of course, it does vary by state.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 02:27 AM
1

Keep in mind that CS payment amounts are final, meaning that if you move, cannot work, or get a lower income, you still gotta pay up. The only chances of it changing are if the woman finds out you have a better job. Read up on some child support horror stories, it can be a lot to deal with for some guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 11:48 PM
0

Ah you right, I was remembering a previous calculation where the numbers were based on the Cali averages, which is 1200. That'd add up to 259k over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 11:42 PM
3

Assuming she's from the US, you're saying she's dealt with over 1.5 million men? I mean wow that's one way to live life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 10:01 PM
5

The average is 430 a month which adds up to 250k over time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 01:53 PM
1

You know what I meant. Not ovulating. Not releasing gametes for fertilization. There is no such period for men, but there is for women, which is why it's way easier to have hormonal bc for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 04:48 AM
-2

Yeah they really didn't like the side effects. Which, btw, were infertility, permanent hormone damage, and death. They didn't feel like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 04:24 AM
1

Biology. Women have a natural period of infertility, and that is during pregnancy. The body increases certain hormones, and as a result, ovulation stops. For female bc, they just had to find a way to mimic that response. For men, there is no natural period of infertility. Tgere is no natural blueprint for a good combination of hormones to achieve temporary infertility. So while they had a template for women, they had to start from scratch to make male bc. For all these years they have not found …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 04:22 AM
9

18 years of child support is like 250k too
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 01:10 AM
1

Actually that's a good one, Russia probably counts as androcentric
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 10:32 PM
3

What part doesn't make sense? Also, I saw the edit above, I nevery said that Androcentrism and Patriarchy don't involve sexism. It's just that sexism is not the main focus of those words, it's how the sexism is applied.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:39 PM
3

Religious practice? Social practice? Usually in those sorts of societies the women are mostly ok with not running things like government, businesses, etc. These days there will almost always be a lot of feminists in every country, so you'll hear about things like women not being able to own businesses, but in many cases the women of the society sort of... don't mind? Idk why though, but I'd guess it's because they can spend more time with family and community instead of having to worry about wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:34 PM
5

Not really, Androcentrism, Patriarchy, and Male Supremacy are different things. The first has to do with who gets the benefits/concern, the second is about which (collective) gender runs the society, and the third is about blatant sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:24 PM
3

Fits the bill for Androcentrism? No clue, most societies prioritize the cares of women first. For Patriarchy? Lots of Islamic societies, and also most religiously conservative nations. Although they are very patriarchal, they aren't Androcentric because even then, mens needs are not catered to over women. They may have more rights, but Androcentrism and Gynocentrism are not about that. They're about government interest, programs, and funding going to a specific gender. To my knowledge, every gov…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:42 PM
6

Androcentrism and Patriarchy aren't the same. Middle Eastern nations are patriarchal, not androcentric. Androcentrism is when men are considered more, and they get more of the concern. Patriarchy is when men have power, but that doesn't necessarily mean that those men use the power to benefit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:13 PM
2

And I am too poor to see what else is out there lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 02:45 AM
1

I'm talking about the pre-50s era where lynchings and church shootings were common. The police were involved too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 09:35 PM
2

Most mass shootings were against POC, and they were obviosly undocumented.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 07:23 PM
7

Ok lets divide by 4 for the UK. Does the UK have 75+ mass shootings every year? No? They only have like 1 or 2? That's what I though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 04:12 AM
1

They weren't in 1940 which was the time period I was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:59 AM
3

Actually yes we did. It's been like that for over 100 years now. It's just that in 50s and prior, most shootings were against POC, since they were easy targets. The police didn't do shit, and often they even participated. Of course, no arrests were made so it was undocumented.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:27 AM
9

Do they have 300+ a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 11:56 PM
1

If all mass shooters were incels then "Chad" would be extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:42 PM
2

And what happens when Mr. Burns gets tired of Timmy's shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:40 PM
7

It's disagree because men are just as demonized in the UK and Australia. Are there nearly as many mass stabbings? The reason the US has this problem is because guns are way more effective than other weapons. The biggest factor is the guns, hands down.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:35 PM
1

Mental gymnastics at an olympic level here. They literally ran the stats on these guys. Misogyny is not a major factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 03:56 PM
1

The NIJ literally said that most mass shooters have these 4 things Childhood trauma and/or exposure to violence at a young age A "crisis point" or significant recent crisis that has a large impact on their life Validation from a belief system Obviously, access to a gun Additionally, most were raised by single mothers, amd most saw it as their final act of life and wanted to go out in such a fashion. There is no real correlation involving misogyny, and although in 57% of the cases they killed a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:31 AM
1

When the MRA types say the numbers are inflated, they're talking about percentages not case counts. In most countries, you can only be tried as a rapist if you're a man. Even in the US, it's defined as using a penis or similar object to penetrate another person. So obviously most studies would find that the vast majority of rapists are men. When they actually define rape as nonconsensual sex, the rates (in perpetrators, for victims men are actually raped more than women when you include prison r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:20 AM
1

Most don't though. Most target men actually. So how can you lable all of them as misogynist incels and label incels as "shooters in training" when only a small minority of the shooters attack women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:05 AM
1

Mass shootings were common. It's just that they often happened to POC because they were easy targets. Police were complicit, so obviously people weren't arrested, which means we have no numbers. So it seems like the shootings went up over the years but that's really not true. Also, if it's "manosphere" content then why aren't they primarily attcking women? Why is it schools and random grocery stores and not places that primarily have women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:39 AM
2

How are men insensitive about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:34 AM
-1

The people who paid their loans off were... able to do so. Loan forgiveness will only apply to those who literally cannot pay it off. The forgiveness listed in the article applied to those with disability, those who had their schools close (no degree but they still have loans to pay), and those who did a large amount of (mostly or fully) unpaid public service. They're not trying to wipe away everybody's loans. If you point to a minority of dems that wanna forgive all loans then I'll gladly point…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:34 AM
–

What about the shooters before the internet? And why didn't the rise of red pill bring on more mass shootings?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:08 AM
2

This is false. Men are excluded from most rape studies. When they're not, and a gender neutral definition of rape is used, then the rates are about the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:07 AM
–

The shooter situation is usually a result of white supremacy mixed with extreme mental health issues and in most cases, celibacy. They believe that they deserve more than what they're getting. Initially it's often because their often-conservative mothers (75% of them were raised by women only) giving them a false sense of reality and optimism. That they can just "put in the work and be yourself" and they'll be a great man that can be great with women. That's total bullshit, so they get introduce…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:00 AM
3

Is this a certain guy's alt? Did he die and posess another account?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 04:46 AM
1

They actually can get you a nice career but there are not nearly enough jobs in that area.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:34 AM
-1

That's not how numbers work, especially when you consider how interest rates are.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:32 AM
-3

So to "keep things fair" these people should get to live the rest of their lives in debt because of predatory colleges and loan sharks? Also it's not like they just spent their money on fancy cars, they literally could not pay off loans especially because of interest.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:31 AM
2

They're already doing that with their plan for capping loans based on income (it's in the $10,000 cancellation package) but guess who's blocking that.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:30 AM
3

Feminine does not in any way mean lesser
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 05:17 PM
5

If that were the case then there would be no money given to childless divorcees.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 01:18 PM
7

The point of alimony was to give women, who at the time usually had no income when married, an ability to stay afloat. That's the basis. It's outdated but it did have a reason.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:33 AM
2

The reality is that just like every social media company, reddit won't care unless it gives them bad publicity. They even left up white supremacist subs, incel subs, jailbait subs, etc. They only shut things down when enough bad attention is drawn to it. That's why even FDS was recently about to get banned even though they're pro-women.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:46 AM
10

Yeah. Overall working and living conditions were bad for all working class people back then, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:15 AM
1

I meant the poor quality and safety/conditions of those jobs, bad wording on my part.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 02:17 AM
2

That makes sense at first but then again you have to consider how little effort it takes to make conditions safe. We still have large textile factories that actually produce even more output, but working conditions are fine at least in comparison to the old days. The only explanation is that the oligarchs of old couldn't care less to do a bare minimum to ensure safety, and that they really only cared if the bottom line was affected. It set a precedent for modern warehouses and factories. Worker …
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:23 PM
1

The reason I mentioned greed is because the owners prioritized profits and output over concern for their workers. They couldn't care less about safety, which is why worker safety slid downhill for a long time. In the modern day we have these same things but instead of fingers being cut off, it's simply low wages and lack of benefits that show the corporate greed.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:19 PM
98

When women worked in factories, they also had such injuries. It's just that they got out of such jobs much before men did. Those jobs only existed because of greed anyway.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:29 PM
1

Your average feminist won't even appear on the news. Just think about it, any women you know will likely say they're a feminist unless either they're conservative or they looked into it and saw things they didn't like.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 03:54 PM
0

Nope, your average feminist isn't even on reddit lol. You gotta understand that almost every sub on reddit is radical. Most feminists, just like more voters, are only there because they look at surface level things like gender equality, social programs that may benefit them, protection of freedoms, etc. Most people don't really go deep into things. Feminism to them means gender equality, so why wouldn't they support it? It doesn't mean they'll be on reddit wanting men to jump through hoops like …
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 11:16 PM
0

Those are 3 radfem subs, which kinda proves my point. As you already know, most everyday feminists are there because they are for gender equality and/or women's rights, they don't really look into the details of the actions from more radical groups. Your average feminist is not ok reddit or twitter complaining about men all day. Ask any woman who is rather uninformed about feminism and they'll likely say they're a feminist. But if you ask them if they think men should commit suicide instead of g…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 01:23 PM
1

Loud minority, silent majority. Also, just ask any feminist, obviously they'd support guys going in for mental help.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 12:50 PM
-3

You're mostly right. Most feminists encourage men to get mental help. It's only the extreme anti-male types that would rather the man just die.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 02:49 AM
4

LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 08:50 PM
4

Not that I agree with them but technically speaking, most of the foundations of medicine were developed by men, and firearms were developed by men. Same with swords, spears, bows and arrows, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 05:17 PM
1

At what point does it stop being useful to compare humans with whales? When we acknowledge that obesity is an issue and not an expression
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 07:35 PM
3

I mean tbf these are the numbers: "Man/Men" x3 "Woman/Women" x3 "Male" x1 "Female" x3 So this isn't that bad tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 09:02 PM
3

one of the girls I'm seeing is 8 PAUSE
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 03:43 AM
9

Spoken like someone with low Testosterone
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:12 AM
1

Yep. Lack of internal review can destroy any movement.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:56 PM
1

I'm not really saying you lied, I'm just saying that it's off.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:34 PM
1

I'm not trying to disporve anything. I know this story probably applies to lots of female MRAs. I'm mainly skeptic because of how new the account is. It'd be the exact same if I saw a feminist version of this.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:32 PM
0

Understood. It's not like this reads as pure fiction, I just think it's good to take precaution. What you said above probably happened to 100% of the women in here, but you rarely see 3h accounts posting about it. Usually on reddit, new accounts that post things like these are either bots, posers, or trolls. It's a thing, if you weren't aware.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:28 PM
0

Exactly. Because feminism isn't 100% bad. They do fight for women. It's just that the way they do so is flawed in many ways, though effective. No sane educated person would argue that feminism is 100% bad. Every social movement has its flaws, even MRAs.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:18 PM
3

It's a 4 paragraph essay on how this woman was originally a feminist but then her MRA friend showed her enough logic to completely change her mind and reject feminism, and how she now sees how it's 100% wrong and we are right. Now, it very well could have happened, and I'm sure lots of MRAs started off like this. But I just think that it's a bit suspicious.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:15 PM
1

Fair. Just watching out for potential reddit propaganda posts.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:04 PM
2

Fair point. Just a precaution tho, there's a lot of propaganda posts on reddit.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:01 PM
4

Guys, this account is 3 hours old. Doubt they were on reddit for a long time
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:35 PM
1

Um, I don't think that implies that fatherhood should always be forced.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:29 AM
1

It depends on how that's done. If a woman wants to enter a shared living space with a group of guys, and the guys don't consent to having a member of the opposite gender, then there would be no issue.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:20 AM
1

I think that women have the right to only have female roommates. As long as a whole property isn't female only, as in they don't reject males for being males even in open suites, then it's fine.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 08:07 PM
1

Actually you're right
/r/MensRights08/05/22 05:11 AM
1

In (), put the name of the link. Then right after the ), put [] and put the link inside
/r/MensRights08/05/22 04:56 AM
1

Abortion is step 1. However, we've had step 1 for quite some time now. Even with abortion, feminists HATE the idea of men having reproductive rights. If there are any feminists here who disagree, just look through my comment history.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:54 PM
1

Sigh Oh wait you're a troll
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:23 AM
1

Women who do this may not necessarily be intending to attract male lust. Most women don't put on a more revealing top to get men to list after her. It's more that they wear those things to be "hot" since that's what they grew up to believe. They wanna feel hot and wear things that "hot" girls wear. It often doesn't directly have anything to do with attracting male lust, although anyone with a functioning brain knows that male lust will come to them. But imo it's dumb for women to do this and com…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:56 AM
1

If you're in an anti-abortion state, you'd have to travel outside the state for an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:40 AM
1

Well I mean they can just choose not to do all that. They don't have to get married to a guy that makes them do everything. It's on them to prevent that from happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 01:27 AM
1

The pay gap, these days in the US, is largely because women pick lesser paying jobs and careers. Given that women are prioritized in education, it's their fault (outside of financial reasons that prevent them from attending college) that some of them don't make enough. The ones who do get an education do better than their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 08:35 PM
1

If men are being oppressed how is this a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:56 PM
1

Probably like Mars
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:53 PM
10

People who do that... choose to do that. There's no reason for you to be complaining about it. People do what they want, no need to judge. All you need to do is have your filter up and ready.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:18 PM
21

This isn't directed at the guy above me but... does anyone feel like a lot the people in here are just... living in a different world? It's like they see getting with better looking women as a competition, and that the average looking women are just worthless NPCs. It's so detached from reality and it exaplains why people may be having problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:51 PM
1

I get that, but that doesn't explain why the richest men with access to personal heslth advisors as well as the world's best doctors still have shorter lifespans than most women.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 08:52 PM
1

Ok. I'll use US statistics. Remember that the US has about 170 million men. In the US, there were 4764 workplace deaths in 2020, including women. There were 71 thousand total drug use deaths in 2020. Even if 100% of these were men, that would be 0.0004% of men. As for sports, the only sport that would cause significant damage to the point of having lower life expectancy would be football, and CTE (what causes the deaths) is astonishingly low among NFL players, and they make up an astonishingly l…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 08:48 PM
1

The percentage of men in things like sports and motorcross is so low that it would not be large enough to have a large impact on the numbers. With football, CTE very very rarely develops in players who don't play in the NFL. And with regards to work, the deaths of those men also aren't large enough to affect the numbers. Although men make up most work deaths, that doesn't mean that there is a large percentage of men to bring the average down by a full 5 years. The fact that men who engage in muc…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:58 PM
1

Lower life expectancy is actually because of testosterone. It kinda overworks your body and directly shortens your lifespan. Men have more which is why they don't live as long.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:16 PM
1

Reddit is not real life. Also that's selection bias. You have echo chambers and such. There's a reason people talk about it annonymously online instead of in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 06:52 PM
1

Women get sympathy, emotional support, and maybe even money for speaking out about their issues. Men get laughed at, clowned, left/divorced, fired, and shamed for doing the same. Of course you'd hear more women speaking out. Just because you as a woman are not being told about the brutal rejections your male friends faced, that doesn't mean they don't experience them. Them telling you could ruin their image. Also, given how women generally ignore non attractive men, it's possible (not saying it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 12:46 PM
1

Women complain about men downplaying their negative experiences, then turn around and downplaybmale experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 06:28 AM
0

What happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 07:58 AM
1

In my experience, there's a large difference betwen what they say they want and what they show (through action and interest) they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 07:24 AM
1

It's always CEOs and managers but never bricklayers or truck drivers
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:30 PM
10

I see this is making the rounds again. I wonder if anything new will come up this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 03:56 AM
1

I'm not saying women didn't do work. Of course they did. But men did more physical things like hunting, building, and gathering resources. I'm talking thousands of years ago btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 01:45 PM
1

Back then, the "socialization" was women staying behind to raise the young while the men did work in the field or the forest. Women wanted the best husband so that he could provide the most to the home. More firewood, meat, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 12:24 PM
1

We do. One example is men being stronger than women overall. Up until about a few hundred years ago, men have always had to do more physical work, and women selected the men who were more capable of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 12:05 PM
1

That's not how it works. Testosterone directly impacts thought and decision making. It's like alcohol in a way, you have less inhibition. At climax, T levels go down for a bit, and you then have all of your inhibition. You can fight it but as a woman you need to understand that it's like a chemical, sort of like a drug. Men, the same men, would be completely different if they went on antidepressants where this function is subdued.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 12:03 PM
1

Posts like these make me believe that many PPD users have not come in contact with a physical blade of grass in a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 09:31 PM
1

That's what I thought. Respect isn't the best word there, acknowledge is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:57 AM
1

Not everyone should be respected. However a lack of respect is different from disrespect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:47 AM
1

Not being respected is not the same as being disrespected. Perhaps that other guy is using the wrong word though, maybe he means acknowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:04 AM
1

I know. That means... it's not actual advice, just common sense, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 02:40 AM
1

The "take a shower thing" is a huge example of women giving bad advice in general. Like obviously everyone should take showers but 1) taking a shower will not attract women and 2) women seem to be consistently attracted to people who happen to not take many showers. That second one is annoying to women so they, again, lecture the normies to not repeat the mistakes of that "Chad" fellow, when women will generally be attracted to Chadwick and not the normies. So it shouldn't even count as advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 03:43 AM
1

This is just a longer version of "take a shower bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 05:10 PM
3

This sub's only real value is the entertainment it provides. It's like some of these people live in a dofferent reality lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 01:47 AM
1

Not RP but I think there are some things labeled as "precautions" that aren't actually that. Like not going to a date alone. If you think that men are so dangerous that you can't go on a date alone, the why are you dating strangers? Also it's kinda annoying to see people consistently treat me as a threat. Hint, it's not the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 05:34 PM
1

She shouldn't in this case, OP didn't do anything meaningful. But generally, it's usually up to the man to impress on the date. It's society though, not that women always act entitled or anything, but many women I see just go to a date and expect to be impressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:53 PM
1

Ok but tbf it sounds like she wasn't gonna put in much effort either. Kinda like it's on him to do something special, right? Why can't she do something special for him? To OP's point, it's like many women wsnt this prince, and won't really accept much less.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:25 PM
1

As in, they're next to me in a class or event, and they make eye contact. I respond with a simple hello. I say something about the class or event. Something about the space that we're in. And most (not all ofc) of them will try to kill it soon. It happens to others as well, but not as often to the taller more attractive guys, the women will try to put in some effort. Just my observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 06:22 PM
1

I'm not walking up to randoms. I'm near them for whatever reason and I start a conversation. I do this to guys too, and the difference is night and day. And I'm in college btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 05:55 PM
1

Whoever is around. I'll try to start a conversation, and it'll be assumed that I'm trying to date them. So they give short responses and try to end the conversation. Most of my female friends were made from mutual female friends where I was around and we started talking. But outside of that? Women are cold to everyone unless the guy is really attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 05:45 PM
1

Whenever men explain why it's more difficult to befriend women, the women rely "but but but we're concerened about our safety!" Many women (not all, idk about most, but many) avoid men unless they're hot. I've seen it through my years. That's the reason men don't befriend women as much. Oh and btw, I do have a number of female friends. But there are factors that prevent me from making more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 05:35 PM
5

I think reddit is glitched. I see common sense here, but the app says I'm in PPD. Anyone have a fix?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:45 AM
1

I think it's fucking stupid. They had bad experiences with humans, yet they still date humans. Rejecting a race for this reason gives the "all of them are the same" energy, it's just dumb lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 08:29 PM
–

Sexism. Not rampant anymore, but still there. Mostly in corporate/management positions. Additionally, women often get disrespected when they go to make huge financial decisions (buying a car, home, etc). But this is life, men have barriers too, maybe even more, maybe not, but to say there's systemic oppression of women would be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:30 PM
–

Not sure how this relates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:27 PM
–

More social barriers than systemic. For example there are lots of sexists among richer people. Richer people tend to end up in corporate/management positions, and their sexism could affect job opportunity for unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:26 PM
–

I wouldn't say there's systemic oppression, but there are some barriers for women. Most have been done away with, but there are actually still a lot of misogynists out there. But systemic? I'd argue that the system is neutral, the only major systemic oppression would be the prison system (fueled by the weed ban) that targets minorities to fill for-profit prisons. In addition to that, the property tax situation further oppresses poorer areas as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:07 AM
1

Bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 05:20 PM
1

Horrible take
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 05:17 PM
1

Men, on average, do not just let out a wave of depression onto their partners whenever they're asked to open up. You're acting as if they do, but they don't. More often, they open up about insecurity or a past trauma, but their partners literally asked for it. Then their partners either lose all affection/respect, or they use it as ammo against them later. And you're still blaming men for this. the way that men emotionally lean on their significant others is unhealthy Men typically don't even do…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 02:27 PM
1

I agree that it's a lack of awareness, but women will often use their man's emotional issues against him when an argument comes up. This is why I call it manipulation, they can't ask the guy to open up just so they can have ammo later. Women also do this to their female friends, except they don't need to ask for the opening up. Also, idk why you're generalizing here. You're acting as if all men will just release the floodgates of depression and anxiety when asked to open up. More often, it's be …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 01:58 PM
1

Then why to women beg and beg for the men to open the floodgates? Why tell him that he needs to let it all out? It's a manipulation tactic that women love to use, and you're still trying to make it the fault of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 01:34 PM
1

"Don't ask me out" is a barrier imo. Not that it changed anything really, but it makes things awkward. It's like if I was talking casually to a gay guy and I told him "hey man just to be clear I'm not gay, don't make any moves" when he was just takking casually.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:00 PM
1

The issue for me is that with some women I gotta go through extra steps because they think I'm after a relationship/sex just because I'm talking to them. That's kinda the whole point of OP's post. With others though it's effortless. I really wasn't seeking something romantic, but the real thing is that I did not flirt or make any romantic moves at all, and then she sends a text that implied that I did. I'll lay out to specify, and keep in mind that she sent me this while we were not hanging out …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 04:19 PM
1

There's a big difference between "yeah we can keep going as just friends" and "don't even think about asking me out, I'd never want to be more than just friends" you know? Now if I ask to hang out she'll likely still be on guard because a few asshole men can't take no for an answer. She never asks, so I'd have to initiate, so it'd seem like I'm trying to either "orbit" or change her mind. I'm not gonna do either but how does she know?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 03:52 PM
1

Ok, but with male friends I don't have to deal with this shit, I can just vibe. Many women set all these barriers and then wonder why men aren't enthusiastic about becoming friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 03:46 PM
2

I was talking to a girl recently. It was 100% platonic, we had great conversations, and the vibe was good. I made no romantic gestures at all, we just spent some time together alone. I wasn't going for a relationship or anything. So anyway we go on a walk and I think we both had a good time, and like 10 minutes after we say bye she sends me a text. It said that she enjoyed the time, but to make no mistake, she had zero intentions of ever starting a relationship and would only be interested in ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 08:31 AM
1

In any good relationship, the man has to satisfy the woman. The woman also has to satisfy the man. But men are more... reasonable in this area. If a guy wants to do something, or wants something, he communicates. The women don't, which is why it's harder to satisfy and therefore harder to maintain a relationship. I agree that if this is the case, the gorl isn't worth doing all that for. I actually was in a relationship where most of the effort was from me to her. Tried to do a bunch, didn't end …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 05:34 PM
1

From my experience, women tend to use more forms if indirect communication. So it's often harder to please a woman than a man, simply because the partner will have to guess the feelings of amother human being. Now we can't really generalize or use averages here because studies on this topic are unreliable, but knowing that women are more likely to use indirect communication, it is likely more difficult to maintain a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 04:03 PM
1

Not that waiting until marriage is unreasonable or anything, but a lot of guys want rather frequent sex in a relationship. And usually, when a woman spends her whole life rejecting sex, she won't suddendly want to do the deed a whole bunch after the wedding. Just a trend though. So that's why a lot of people would rather not take the risk of locking themselves into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 07:04 AM
1

I wasn't really clear enough, but this was a good response. I'm not really talking about a rough patch, a week, a month, etc. I'm talking about a permanent situation. Say one partner (regardless of gender) is rarely in the mood, and the other has a high drive. Is the other partner just supposed to repress everything? People don't like to admit it, but many men cannot really get off without visual stimulation. If the low libido partner rejects sex, then the other has 4 options. First, suppress th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 11:37 PM
1

And if the sex life is not healthy? What if she's not in the mood as often?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 08:42 PM
2

I disagree. l Money is a factor, and we're talking hundreds and thousands for one night. It's kinda like telling a couple with fertility issues to just get a surrogate (although that's much more expensive).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 05:16 AM
2

I'm not saying you're wrong or anything, but I find it strange how this almost never gets brought up when the guy is the one denying sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 06:17 AM
1

Well the same applies to gay men. And usually the homophobics are way harder on gay men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 09:55 PM
2

Replied to wrong comment maybe? Or actually, my comment can go both ways. I meant that approaching as a man is more risky to a degree, since it can blow up your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:37 PM
1

I am one, or at least the college-student equivalent (high paying internship secured from big company). Also I think I'm a 7/8. I get absolutely nothing in terms of dating lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:17 AM
1

Wow way to shame
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:49 AM
1

I disagree. With the second one, the woman can just leave. With the first? The man first has to decide whether or not to disconnect from the child. Then they gotta explain to everyone that the kid they were with is actually not their kid. Also, they were likely investing time, money, and emotion in that kid. And the woman not knowing it wasn't his? That's bullshit in most cases tbh. For them to really not know, she would've had to be already cheating on him since conception, and at best she woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:48 AM
2

Because that's what the comment I replied to was talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:35 AM
8

Lol the dating game is already in your favor simply because you are a woman. You likely just made it significantly easier. For a man it's mostly about height, charisma, and taking advantage of opportunity. For women it's just be available and nice looking. But you probably could learn the game and succeed, the world isn't what this sub thinks it is lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:23 AM
1

It is, but not really comparable in the same sense. Putting love and effort into a child and then finding out that the kid is not yours and instead the result of your partner's ultimate betrayal is worse that finding out your husband has a secret kid who you never knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:17 AM
1

Fitness training
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:15 AM
3

Fair, but I think approaching as a woman is much muchv different that approaching as a man. Especially with the MeToo thing. There's generally greater risk especially with coworkers and strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 01:54 AM
1

That's not really the same bc you wouldn't be rasing and funding the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 01:51 AM
39

Honestly, I'm not sure! That totally means we should offer absolutely no sympathy to the millions of men forced to die horrible deaths in trenches, because they happen to share the same gender as the 5 people who provoked the whole mess! Instead, we should offer our greatest sympathy to those who stay home!
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:14 PM
2

Tbf that's kinda happening all around the world. I don't think it's right to blame that one on Biden.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 07:06 PM
0

That is true. Although I think they'd still take action and choose someone who meets their needs. Among the options, they'll quickly find someone and likely stay because the girl may be more enthusiastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 06:01 PM
3

I think autocorrect murdered your comment lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 11:42 PM
9

Yes. If they look good and aren't assholes, they either get snatched up very quickly online, or they have little success because they aren't good enough at conversations through text.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 08:50 PM
–

According to this sub I don't get women so I'm therefore a nice guy who women reject in favor of this "Chad" fellow
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:18 PM
–

Honestly? The best profile is a deleted one. Go out and talk to men who are [DaScoobyShuffle proceeds to describe his own qualities as if he's a saint] and you'll find a great man to partner with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 06:24 PM
2

This makes so much sense. Another example of statistics being misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:19 AM
6

IIRC, the study that showed that women earned 30% less was misleading because of the method. They pooled the amount that all men made, and all women, and compared that. So yes the average is likely higher, but when you take out the billionare outliers, the gap closes. Median is a much much more telling statistic when looking at income, mean will always be skewed because some guys are making $200,000,000,000. Also, a feminist group pressured Google into doing a salary investigation to look for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:04 AM
5

Yeah. When MFs be makin $250 million, that's gonna skew the numbers. Median is probably closer to 40k or even lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 09:31 PM
4

Lol that's bullshit. Trump's tax cuts really juiced the deficit, as usual. Cutting taxes for the rich is something Reps love, and that just raises the deficit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 03:38 PM
3

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 07:11 PM
1

Thank you for being reasonable. Honestly we all just need to call out the creeps and aggressors, that way they can die down.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:19 PM
1

I see what point you're trying to make but you have to be more specific. Men have have good relationships with women are less dangerous than the other kind. But those who are good at sleeping around will probably be more aggressive and end up sexually assaulting people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:32 PM
2

Be careful of reporting bias. Men are significantly less likely to report sexual violence because usually it results in shame. I remember a report about how when a man reports any kind of violence to the police, he is actually more likely to be arrested. Also, pedophilia from women to boys is way more common than you'd think, but usually when it happens the story gets spinned as "female teacher has sexual relations with student" and it's not classified as rape or sexual violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:24 PM
2

Understandable. You have the common sense approach, which is probably why you've been banned from FDS lol. And I like how you called out that woman, I feel that both genders need to call out their assholes. Also, what people across reddit don't seem to understand is that FDS exists for maximum female benefit. That's not a bad principle in itself tbh, but the mods enforce it too harshly to the point where anyone who expresses empathy for men is shamed. Thus, the "female benefit" you'll see there …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:14 PM
3

Ok it seems like you're somewhat of an advocate for FDS. To answer your question, those people are assholes. But FDS, and many hyperfeminist groups, seem to ignore the shit women do to men. I remember studies showing that domestic abuse is something that both genders doat the same rates. However men are much less likely to report it. Same goes for sexual harassment and objectification, especially in the workplace. So my question to you is, how do you feel about that, and do you think there shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:02 PM
4

You're right. My main point is that if women are not at the top, then we do not live in a matriarchy. They generally get more favor than men, but it's not like they rule society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 04:17 PM
1

Well yeah I didn't mean to imply that men having money is an accident, but rather that are societal values (men having to do the hard work, in this case) have resulted in men having more money. And yeah, it's pretty stupid for (many but not all) women to only go for the highest bracket of who happen to not have to be good people to get what they want, but then complain when most of those people are assholes. Then they ignore the more average guys who work to make people happy, but don't have as …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:51 PM
1

I 100% agree. Money is the deciding factor. Men hust happen to have more money, for a cariety of reasons. They make money by appealing to the masses. With current social media driven feminist movements, appealing to women is lucrative. But there is no matriarchy or patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:28 PM
2

The suffix -archy indicates who rules the top. In the higher levels of the economy and government, men make all the decisions. Thus, it is not a matriarchy since women usually aren't in those positions. If you were to say that society is skewed towards women, then I'd agree. But they are not the rulers of society. America isn't exactly a strict patriarchy either, but we're way closer to that than a matriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:10 PM
1

I feel like that depends on which aspects of society. In dating, and even just interpersonal interactions in general, women often have the favor these days. People are expected to treat them good all the time unless they're extremely crazy, but with men you have a bit more leeway. Other than that, women don't have that much of an advantage imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 02:36 PM
3

There are overwhelmingly more mem making societal decisions that affect everyone. Thus, it's unfair to call (American) society a matriarchy. It's not a patriarchy either, but it's much closer to that than a matriarchy imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 02:25 PM
6

Oh come on. Men still dominate the top. Look at the most powerful people. Look at the presidents.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 02:12 PM
15

Average in numbers, or average in looks? Because average looking men who go for average looking women have low success rates. Average in population? Well the average man is also overweight, and studies often show that even they get much lower chances than their female counterparts. In general, men would date their counterparts, but women wouldn't, that's kinda the point here. You likely didn't go for your counterparts, you likely went for people with all the options, which is why you had lower s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 05:05 PM
27

See here's where your misunderstanding is. This is not the male equivalent. The people here complaining are not the ones who were rejecting people. You asked people out, chances are they were in the higher bracket of options. You were (probably) average asking out top tier people. The people here claim to have been average asking out average people, getting rejected for higher tiers, and coming back later for security. What you had is a counterpart, certainly, but not an equivalence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 04:42 PM
2

Porn stars often have similar sizes, but the camera angles make them look bigger. Try this, get full mast in front of the mirror, and bent over enough so that your shoulders are over your toes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 04:42 PM
2

Hell no the guy shouldn't have to pay shit, it's not his obligation. Does it suck for the children? Absolutely. But it's not that guy's problem. If we had the child tax credit then the children could be helped.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 06:55 PM
–

Jeffrey Epstien also liked inexperienced women who probably had no idea what they were doing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 02:15 PM
–

import women Hey FBI how come he gets to do human trafficking and I can't?! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 09:54 PM
0

So, you don't want to approach men but you want them to approach you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:30 AM
2

I do not refer to women as bitches even if they may deserve it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 12:24 AM
4

This is like saying "I use the term bitches to refer to bitches, and women to refer to women" Just call people immature or childish, no need for gender specific slurs as that comes off as a bit sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 01:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter